Cooling Tower Performance Assessment PDF
Cooling Tower Performance Assessment PDF
Cooling Tower Performance Assessment PDF
CenPEEP Cooling Tower Thermal Performance Testing Importance po a ce o of Cooling oo g Tower o Performance o
Monitoring
Cooling water system plays a vital role in dissipation of waste heat in power station. More than 60 % of total heat input p to the plant is finally dissipated as waste heat. The waste heat from the power plant is carried away by circulating water and ultimately gets dissipated in cooling tower.
The efficiency of cooling tower has direct effect on condenser vacuum and in turn, the heat rate of f the h station. i 1oC rise i in i cold ld water t t temperature t corresponds d to 2.5mm vacuum loss or 5 kcal/kWh in HR which c co corresponds espo ds to app approx. o Rs. s 68 lakhs a so of loss per annum in terms of direct fuel cost for a 500 MW unit.
Wet Bulb Temperature (WBT) at Tower inlet Cold Water Temperature Hot Water Temperature CW Flow to each Tower Fan Motor Power
CenPEEP Cooling Tower Thermal Performance Testing Acceptable Test Conditions CW Flow rate Cooling Range Wet-Bulb Temp Fan Motor Power : 90 110% of Design : 80 120% of Design : Design +/- 8.50 C : 90 110% of Design
CenPEEP
Difference between the Cold Water Temperature at CT outlet and Inlet air Wet Bulb Temperature Range Difference between the Hot Water Temperature (inlet to CT) and Cold Water Temperature (outlet of CT)
CenPEEP Cooling g Tower Performance Salient Terms Used in CT Testing T Tower Capability C bilit The most reliable means to assess the cooling tower thermal performance. It is defined as the percentage of water that the tower can cool to the design cold water temperature when the inlet wet-bulb, cooling range, water flow rate and fan motor power are all at their design value. value
Predicted Water Flow Rate =Calculated from Manufacturer graphs g p and actual test conditions i.e. WBT, Range and Cold water temperature.
Where : QT = Measured water flow rate, t/hr Predicted water flow rate, t/hr No. of cells for design water flow rate No. of cells in operation during test Fan motor p power design, g kW Fan motor power measured, kW
CenPEEP Cooling g Tower Performance Performance Analysis CT degradation to be assessed based on Capability test Deviation to be derived from actual temperature and predicted cold water temperature
CenPEEP Causes for Performance Deterioration Fill clogging Increase in weight of 2-3 times Deposition in the fills comes from the turbidity of make up water air borne dust from the atmospheric air being drawn into the cooling tower precipitates of dissolved silica
Damage of fills. Ch ki of Chocking f nozzle. l Falling of nozzle. Damage of splash bars. Algae g formation on splash bars Damaged drift eliminators Unequal water flow in different cells. Recirculation of vapors. Poor air flow due to less blade angle angle.
CenPEEP Causes for Performance Deterioration Hot water distribution pipe damage Annular clearance between distribution pipe and hot water channel Growth of trees/plants/bushes near cooling tower Overflow of cold water basin. Improper quality of water
Control of COC Control of Turbidity
Cleaning of fills with water jets Cleaning of fills manually by removing from tower Cleaning of cold water basin during overhauls. Regular cleaning/checking of nozzles. Continuous Chlorination & Shock dozing to maintain required FRC
CenPEEP
L < 2 Meters, ,
X Measurement Station.
L < 2 Meters,
X Measurement Station.
CenPEEP Cooling Tower Thermal Performance Testing Wet Bulb lb Temp. measurement setup
CenPEEP Cooling Tower Thermal Performance Testing Grid setup p for f Cold Water Temp. p measurement
CenPEEP Cooling Tower Thermal Performance Testing Grid setup for Cold Water Temp. measurement of single cell
CenPEEP Cooling Tower Thermal Performance Testing Grid setup for Cold Water Temp. measurement of single cell
CenPEEP
Grid Measurement for Cold Water Temperature for one Cell
Grid of 48 probes
CT Performance Test
Design CWT HWT WBT CW Flow Fan Power (A (Average) ) Range Approach Effectiveness (Actual) Effectiveness (EXP) Capability 100 32 44 27 7 27.7 2222/40000 47.81 12 4.3 73.62 Cell -14 31 33 31.33 40.51 24 52 24.52 2520 45.65 9.18 6.81 57.4 63.22 87.13 Cell - 11 31 84 31.84 41.13 24 42 24.42 2515 43.84 9.29 7.42 55.59 64.4 80.04
CenPEEP
Total Tower 31 6 31.6 41.1 24 6 24.6 44188 44.17 9.50 7.0 57.58 64.32 85.07
37.0 36.0 35.0 34.0 33.0 32.0 31.0 30.0 29.0 28.0 27.0 23.0 24.0 25.0 26.0 27.0 28.0 29.0 30.0 31.0 32.0 33.0
C-8.8C
B-11.0C
A- 13.25C
C-8.8C
B-11.0C
A- 13.25C
C-8.8C
B-11.0C
A- 13.25C
37.0 37 0 36.0 35.0 34.0 33.0 32.0 31.0 30 0 30.0 29.0 28.0 27.0 23.0 24.0 25.0 26.0 27.0 28.0 29.0 30.0 31.0 32.0 33.0
C-8.8C
B-11.0C
A- 13.25C
COOLING RANGE (C) ( ) 90% Flow 100% Flow 110% Flow Test Range
30.6 30.4 30.2 30.0 29 8 29.8 29.6 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115
Test Cold Water Temp 35.9 C Predicted Flow 77,000 t/hr, Actual Flow - 30,977 t/hr
DEPOSITS IN FILL
CenPEEP
ALGAE FORMATION
CenPEEP
CenPEEP
CenPEEP
CenPEEP
SEALING OF AIR PASSAGE THROUGH SHAFT OPENING
CenPEEP
CenPEEP