The document discusses how process and production monitoring can improve a company's bottom line through small improvements in key areas like cycle time, scrap reduction, downtime reduction, quality improvement, and material tracking. It explains that monitoring systems provide real-time data to identify issues, increase efficiencies, reduce costs, and boost profits. The document also presents a case study of a food manufacturing company that improved overall equipment effectiveness from 83% to 93% and increased capacity by implementing a process monitoring strategy that incentivized employees with bonuses tied to efficiency metrics.
The document discusses how process and production monitoring can improve a company's bottom line through small improvements in key areas like cycle time, scrap reduction, downtime reduction, quality improvement, and material tracking. It explains that monitoring systems provide real-time data to identify issues, increase efficiencies, reduce costs, and boost profits. The document also presents a case study of a food manufacturing company that improved overall equipment effectiveness from 83% to 93% and increased capacity by implementing a process monitoring strategy that incentivized employees with bonuses tied to efficiency metrics.
The document discusses how process and production monitoring can improve a company's bottom line through small improvements in key areas like cycle time, scrap reduction, downtime reduction, quality improvement, and material tracking. It explains that monitoring systems provide real-time data to identify issues, increase efficiencies, reduce costs, and boost profits. The document also presents a case study of a food manufacturing company that improved overall equipment effectiveness from 83% to 93% and increased capacity by implementing a process monitoring strategy that incentivized employees with bonuses tied to efficiency metrics.
The document discusses how process and production monitoring can improve a company's bottom line through small improvements in key areas like cycle time, scrap reduction, downtime reduction, quality improvement, and material tracking. It explains that monitoring systems provide real-time data to identify issues, increase efficiencies, reduce costs, and boost profits. The document also presents a case study of a food manufacturing company that improved overall equipment effectiveness from 83% to 93% and increased capacity by implementing a process monitoring strategy that incentivized employees with bonuses tied to efficiency metrics.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 0
Improving Your Bottom Line by Using
Production & Process Monitoring
Curt Norby, (Product Manager - Software Solutions) Productivity and Process monitoring What is it? Why do it? Possible solutions What Can Process & Production Monitoring do to Improve a companies bottom line? Improve and/or Stabilize Cycle Times Reduce Scrap What Can Process & Production Monitoring do to Improve a companies bottom line? Reduce Downtime What Can Process & Production Monitoring do to Improve a companies bottom line? Improve Quality What Can Process & Production Monitoring do to Improve a companies bottom line? Track Material What Can Process & Production Monitoring do to Improve a companies bottom line? Improve Overall Efficiency What Can Process & Production Monitoring do to Improve a companies bottom line? Its the Little Things that Make the Difference Improve and/or Stabilize Cycle Times Reduce Scrap Reduce Downtime Improve Quality Track Material Improve Overall Efficiency S m a l l
i m p r o v e m e n t
i n
S m a l l
i m p r o v e m e n t
i n
a n y
( o r
a l l )
o f
t h e s e
a n y
( o r
a l l )
o f
t h e s e
a r e a s
t r a n s l a t e s
t o
a r e a s
t r a n s l a t e s
t o
M O R E
P R O F I T $ $ . M O R E
P R O F I T $ $ . What is OEE? OEE : Overall Equipment Effectiveness OEE = Availability x Performance x Quality A Closer Look at OEE Availability Actual Run Time vs. Available Run Time Performance Actual Cycle Time vs. Standard Cycle Time Actual #of Cavities vs. Standard #of Cavities Quality Good Parts Produced vs. Total Parts Produced Improvements The greatest economic impact can be enjoyed by measuring the impact of Cycle-time reduction Scrap reduction Downtime and set-up time reduction Improved product quality Small improvements in the amount of scrap, downtime, cycle time, and part quality can provide dramatic increases in profitability Improvements More Accurate Measurements & Results Manual Method vs. Automated Method Automated Monitoring Automated Monitoring Information is more Timely Real-Time vs. Waiting for Data Entry Business Impact from Production Monitoring Target Correct Opportunities Use monitoring to Identify the most profitable jobs and eliminate the less profitable jobs. Identify the most efficient, most profitable part/machine combination. Business Impact from Production Monitoring Predictability Efficiencies are more constant and repeatable. Business Impact from Production Monitoring Improve Capacity Increase available Machine time for more jobs. Improve Machine Utilization Actual hours run for good parts as a % of total hours available Productive Downtime No Work Mold change Mold setup Where is the leverage? Where is the leverage? Reduce Customer Returns Parts scrapped at customer location Most costly place to find poor quality Improve On-time shipments $10M Company, Fixed Costs $2M, Variable Costs 75% Cost of Sales Capacity R e v e n u e
&
C o s t s
( M i l l i o n s ) $10M Company, Fixed Costs $2M, Variable Costs 75% Cost of Sales Capacity R e v e n u e
&
C o s t s
( M i l l i o n s ) Breakeven Point $8M at 80% Capacity $10M Company, Fixed Costs $2M, Variable Costs 75% Cost of Sales Capacity R e v e n u e
&
C o s t s
( M i l l i o n s ) $0.5 Million Profit @ 100% Capacity Production & Process Improvements Variable costs were reduced 5% by Improved Process Repeatability Reducing scrap Fewer start-up parts Less raw material used $10M Company, Fixed Costs $2M, Variable Costs 70% Cost of Sales Results of Reducing Variable Costs by 5% Capacity R e v e n u e
&
C o s t s
( M i l l i o n s ) Breakeven Point $6.7M at 67% Capacity $10M Company, Fixed Costs $2M, Variable Costs 70% Cost of Sales Results of Reducing Variable Costs by 5% Capacity R e v e n u e
&
C o s t s
( M i l l i o n s ) $1.0 Million Profit @ 100% Capacity Value of Downtime/Set-up Time Variable per-hour cost is $45 Planned profit is $10 per hour Direct labor and support costs continue even when unexpected downtime and set-up time occur & profits are lost The cost of this unplanned time is $45 plus $10 planned profits or $55 per hour Value of Downtime/Set-up Time Since profits are recovered at $10 per hour, a machine must produce parts for 5.5 hours to make up for 1 hour of unplanned downtime or set-up time. $55/$10 = 5.5 hours Value of Scrap Scenario: Scrap cannot be reused Variable cost per part is 4 cents Raw material cost per part is 5 cents Planned profit per part is 1 cent Now the cost of a rejected part is 4 cents (variable costs), planned profit of 1 cent, AND the cost of the raw material, another 5 cents. Total = 10 cents Value of Scrap Now 10 good parts must be made to recover the costs of one bad part. The Problem Market: Food preparation Situation: 123 molding machines running 24 hours per day, 365 days per year Existing software did not contain features necessary to improve OEE Actions: Removed the old (competitive) system and Installed a Shotscope NX system ten years ago Analysis: With Shotscope NX an initial OEE improvement to 83% was recorded but then plateaued Shotscope NX Success Stories The Solution Solution: Using Shotscope NX the customer decided on a strategy where they would publish a Real- Timeefficiency metric on the floor for everyone to see and they would empower the employees by offering a bonus pay program based on the efficiency value The better the efficiency number, the greater the bonus Result: The strategy went live in May 2008 As of May 2009, they have seen an increase in the overall efficiency of 8 10%. The customer improved efficiency from 83% to 93% Our capacity and scheduling model has changed drastically as a result of the efficiency improvement. Our schedules became more accurate and increased our overall capacity. We now have the capacity for additional jobs We couldnt have done this without Shotscope Shotscope NX Success Stories Benefits of Process Monitoring Elimination of scrap and rework Reduction of inspection and test Greater customer satisfaction Move from problem solving to problem prevention Increased machine up time and yields Reduction in cycle times Reduction in manufacturing cost Improved profitability & ROI Plant wide solution (Web enabled) Automatically capture all process and production data for permanent record Data that is viewable in real time, from anywhere Improve output from existing capital equipment Allocate jobs where they will run most efficiently Track process data to improve quality Automatically track maintenance of all plant equipment Transfer data to and from other IT systems What Should a Process & Production Monitoring System Do For You? What cannot be measured, cannot be managed Questions? Curt Norby (cnorby@husky.ca)