Telecom Tower Roof Top Analysis Report

MTE Engineering Co.,Ltd.
Fax: 513598, Mobile: 5019332, 5106643, 73042214
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
for Roof Top Installation
SITE CODE: SITE OWNER: SITE ADDRESS:
Operator Project HUAWEI
YGN-0072
Technologies (YGN)
SA By Tarabit Wave SA Team ID TW-SA-01 Engineer Mr. Location Map YGN
SUMMARY Report
29-July-2013
RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS:
The building is structurally adequate in its current condition.
Good
Tripod status at Point of each Item Pole Pole Pole Pole Equ. position 1 2 3 4 on beam
Pole Description of each analysis ( Roof top) adequate status Yes/No 9M YES YES NO NO Yes
14
6m YES Yes YES YES YES
The building is structurally adequate for proposed tripod tower The building is structurally adequate for proposed tripod tower The building is structurally adequate for proposed tripod tower The building is structurally adequate for proposed tripod tower BTS load on beam ( exception of Tripod support on beam) Source of data As-built No Yes Reference on Survey Data Attached
H(m)
Analysis Reference Data: Sir. 1 2 Description XCDC - As-built Data Site photos & Survey
Tripole, Roof top, 12.8
12
Floors=4
10
Height of BLD Roof top
The analysis of the building (data) as per ACI- Steel Minimium See Site survey sketch
Additional Task work Status The strengthening : the structure modification:
Yes/No No No
Remark
0 0 5 10
15
BLd width (m)
H(m)
10 8 6 4 2 0
Nan Dar B.E ( Civil) Structural Engineer

STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
Type of Tripod
9M 6M
Location
Fax: 513598, Mobile: 5019332, 5106643, 73042214
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
SITE CODE: SITE OWNER: SITE ADDRESS:
Operator Project HUAWEI
YGN-0072
Technologies (YGN)
SA By Tarabit Wave SA Team ID TW-SA-01 Engineer Mr. Location Map YGN
29-July-2013
Tripod
position at:
1 Yes/No Yes YES YES
Sr. Description of each analysis ( Roof top) adequate status A The building is structurally adequate in its current condition. B The building is structurally adequate for proposed 9m tripod and equipment. C
The building is structurally adequate for proposed 6m tripod and equipment.
Tripod position at: 2 B The building is structurally adequate for proposed 9m tripod and equipment. C
The building is structurally adequate for proposed 6m tripod and equipment.
YES YES
The structural framming system for Pole 2 is the same as the pole 1.
B9''X14" The roof top STR status in without poles: Structure is safe Structure is safe for 9M and 6M is OK Analysis Reference Data: Sir. 1 2 Description XCDC - As-built Data Site photos & Survey See Site survey sketch Yes/No No No Remark Source of data As-built No Yes Reference on Survey Data Attached 3-16mm @T&B 1-6.5mm @6"
The analysis of the building (data) as per ACI- Steel Minimium
Additional Task work Status The strengthening : the structure modification:
Nan Dar B.E (Civil) Structural Engineer
C9''X9" 4-16mm @section 1-6.5mm @7.5"Tie
B9''X12" 2-16mm @T&B 1-6.5mm @5"
Fax: 513598, Mobile: 5019332, 5106643, 73042214
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.
CRITERIA / DESIGN SPECIFICATION3 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 Important Factor Exposure Category / Wind Speed up Design Considerations Material Strength Codes and References
Page 2 2 3 4 5 6
Introduction Tower Description Roof Description Conclusions and Recommendations
2.
INVESTIGATION REPORT 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4
4 4 5 5 5 6 8 Pages
3.
DESIGN COMPUTATIONS 3.1 3.2 Calculations of Wind Forces Etab Analysis Result Summary ANNEX
4.
1 CRITERIA / DESIGN SPECIFICATION In the structural investigation of the 9m and 6m Type Tower and the immediately affected roof framing due to the installation of the proposed telecom antennas. The modeling and analysis of the tower were performed using ETab 9.5
9M
Load criteria Dead Load : Super imposed dead Load = 20 psf Parapet Wall Load = 120 lb per cuft ( as per site ) Live load : Reactions at each point of Tripod. ( see Table) Service equipment load = as per requested loads Existing Water Tank load = according to Capacity
6M
Wind Load:
As per Attached Wind Load reaction data V200 and V160
1.1 IMPORTANCE FACTOR For serviceability consideration, this shall be taken equal to 1.0
Fax: 513598, Mobile: 5019332, 5106643, 73042214
1.2 EXPOSURE CATEGORY / WIND SPEED-UP According Tower Reaction Tables, where all necessaries Service reactions are described. 1.3DESIGN CONSIDERATION In the analysis of the tower which in addition to the existing roof top, the design take into consideration for the proposed antenna and appurtenances as follows:
30 20 10 0 -10 -20 -30 80 60 40 20 0 -20 -40 -60

1 1 57
Fz@X (9m)
Fz@X(6m)
@X
Fx'@XMax.= +/- 1.14 kN
@X
Fz@C (9m) Fz@C(6m)
Fy'@XMax.= +/- 7.581 kN Mx'@X Max.= +/- 0 kN*m My'@X Max.= +/- 0 kN*m Fz'@XMax.= +/- 26.634 kN
@Center
Fx Max.= +/- 1.209 kN Fy Max.= +/- 0.89 kN Mx Max.= +/- 0.921 kN*m My Max.= +/- 1.112 kN*m
60 40
@C
20 0 -20 -40 -60 1 2 3 4
Fz@Y (9m) Fz@Y(6m)
DN -Fz Max.= + 57.011 kN Up- Fz Max.= -48.827 kN
@Y
Fx'@YMax.= +/- 10.377 kN
@Y
Fy'@YMax.= +/- 0.531 kN Mx'@Y Max.= +/- 0 kN*m My'@Y Max.= +/- 0 kN*m Fz'@YMax.= +/- 37.713 kN
Fax: 513598, Mobile: 5019332, 5106643, 73042214
The Analysis of the structure is based on the following Reaction table. ( The Max. reactions due to Wind) Reaction of RT Pole 9m (V200) is The Major Criteria check loads for 9 M and 6M Type Towers Installation. Node Center Wind Load'@ 0 Case1 Case2 Case3 Case4 Case1 Support X Case2 Case3 Case4 Case1 Support Y Case2 Case3 Case4 Reaction of RT Pole 6m (V200) Horizontal Node Center Wind Load'@ 0 Case1 Case2 Case3 Case4 Case1 Support X Case2 Case3 Case4 Case1 Support Y Case2 Case3 Case4
1.4MATERIAL STRENGTH Material strength used for structural steel assumed to have complied with internationallyrecognized standards and have the following minimum yield strength. 45 180 270 0 45 180 270 0 45 180 270 45 180 270 0 45 180 270 0 45 180 270
Fx kN -1.204 -0.881 1.209 0.886 -1.14 -0.531 1.138 0.529 -10.377 -7.585 10.374 7.582
Fz kN -33.362 -48.827 41.546 57.011 0.093 26.634 0.259 -26.281 37.713 26.638 -37.361 -26.286 Vertical Fz kN -18.285 -26.555 21.632 29.902 20.177 14.289 -19.828 -13.94 0.131 14.289 0.218 -13.94
Fy kN -0.001 -0.885 0.006 0.89 -0.365 -7.581 0.362 7.578 0.366 -0.531 -0.368 0.529 Horizontal Fy kN -0.02 2.05 0.023 -2.047 0 -0.478 0 0.478 0.02 -7.536 -0.023 7.533
Mx kNm -0.11 -0.892 0.138 0.921 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mz kNm 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Moment
My kNm 1.084 0.886 -1.112 -0.914 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Fx kN 2.92 2.05 -2.917 -2.047 -10.678 -7.536 10.675 7.533 -0.675 -0.478 0.675 0.478
Mx kNm -0.061 2.102 0.07 -2.093 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mz kNm 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
My kNm -3.036 -2.102 3.027 2.093 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
- All steel pipes assumed to conform to ASTM A53 Grade with Minimum Yield Stress of 240MPa. - Structural Steel Plate assumed to have minimum yield s strength of 240 MPa. - Structural Connection Bolts assumed to conform to ASTM A325. - Anchor Bolts assumed to conform to ASTM A572 with minimum yield strength of 414 MPa.
The Compressive Strength of reinforced concrete is assumed at 18MPa. Reinforcing steel bars are likewise assumed to have minimum yield strength of 275 Mpa. reinforcement, respectively.
The Second criteria check list ( Reactions) for 6M Type if the 9M Type reactions are not adaquate.
The First criteria check list ( Reactions) for 9M and 6M Types
Horizontal
Vertical
Horizontal
Moment
Fax: 513598, Mobile: 5019332, 5106643, 73042214
1.5 CODES AND REFERENCES
- AISC Steel Construction Manual, 9th,13th Edition - AISC LRFD "Load and Resistance Factor Design" Vol. 1, 3rd edition - ACI 318.99 , ACI318-05 / 1BC 2003
2 INVESTIGATION REPORT 2.1 INTRODUCTION This report summarizes the structural engineering investigation of the existing roof framing and the immediately affected of 2 types of Towers. The tower shall be utilized to carry additional telecommunication antennas, as indicated in tem 1.3. For this reason, a structural investigation is conducted to determine the structural integrity of the tower and the roof structures. 2.2 TOWER DESCRIPTION As per Towers specification (Type 9M and 6M)
See Detail technical data sheets of each tower.

2.3 ROOOF DESCRIPTION The roof structural framing considered immediately affected by the transmitted tower load are the roof columns, beams and slab bounded along roof framing. 2.4 Assume Reinforcements tables: STRUCTURAL MEMBER SECTION (mm) Assume As, ACI 318-05 Minimum Reinforcement REINTFORCEMENT OF "AS-BUILT"
SECTION
Typ.Column C-1
225
x 225
4 of mm
16
Per section
Should be not less than the equivalent in ACI 318-05 Minimum Reinforcement if to be verified Should be not less than the equivalent in ACI 318-05 Minimum Reinforcement if to be verified Should be not less than the equivalent in ACI 318-05 Minimum Reinforcement if to be verified
At X Direction B1
225
x 350
3 of mm
16
At top and bot.
At Y Direction B2
225
x 300
2 of mm
16
At top and bot.
Note: SECTION dimensions are based from contractor's site survey. TOP and BTM(bottom) rebars are at ends and mid-span of beam, respectively or continuous. Refer to 1.5 MATERIAL STRENGTH for concrete and reinforcement characteristic. For the roof slab of 100mm thick, shrinkage and temperature reinforcement is only required. Hence, the same is safe should its "as-built" reinforcement would be 10mm spaced equally at 250mm placed along each side of the slab at the top and bottom layer positions.
Fax: 513598, Mobile: 5019332, 5106643, 73042214
3.1 Calculation of wind forces The Reaction tables was given by The Vendor ( Wind Load calculation)
Reaction of RT Pole 9m (V200) Node 1
Service Wind WIND 0 DEG WIND 45 DEG WIND 180 DEG WIND 275 DEG WIND 0 DEG WIND 45 DEG WIND 180 DEG WIND 275 DEG WIND 0 DEG WIND 45 DEG WIND 180 DEG WIND 275 DEG
Horizontal Fx kN -1.204 -0.881 1.209 0.886 -1.14 -0.531 1.138 0.529 -10.377 -7.585 10.374 7.582 Horizontal Fx kN -0.781 -0.562 0.783 0.565 -0.688 -0.324 0.687 0.323 -6.239 -4.564 6.237 4.563
Vertical Fy kN -33.362 -48.827 41.546 57.011 0.093 26.634 0.259 -26.281 37.713 26.638 -37.361 -26.286 Vertical Fy kN -19.073 -28.521 26.621 36.07 0.141 16.319 0.204 -15.975 23.051 16.321 -22.706 -15.976
Horizontal Fz kN -0.001 -0.885 0.006 0.89 -0.365 -7.581 0.362 7.578 0.366 -0.531 -0.368 0.529 Horizontal Fz kN 0.002 -0.564 0.001 0.566 -0.218 -4.563 0.217 4.561 0.217 -0.324 -0.218 0.323
Mx kNm -0.11 -0.892 0.138 0.921 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Moment My kNm 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Moment My kNm 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mz kNm 1.084 0.886 -1.112 -0.914 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reaction of RT Pole 9m (V160) Node 1 Service Wind WIND 0 DEG WIND 45 DEG WIND 180 DEG WIND 275 DEG WIND 0 DEG WIND 45 DEG WIND 180 DEG WIND 275 DEG WIND 0 DEG WIND 45 DEG WIND 180 DEG WIND 275 DEG Mx kNm -0.039 -0.53 0.056 0.548 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mz kNm 0.685 0.529 -0.702 -0.546 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1.5m
x z
Node 1 o 9M 1.5m Node 5 Node 6
Fax: 513598, Mobile: 5019332, 5106643, 73042214
Reaction of RT Pole 6m (V200) Node 1 Service Wind WIND 0 DEG WIND 45 DEG WIND 180 DEG WIND 275 DEG WIND 0 DEG WIND 45 DEG WIND 180 DEG WIND 275 DEG WIND 0 DEG WIND 45 DEG WIND 180 DEG WIND 275 DEG Horizontal Fx kN 2.92 2.05 -2.917 -2.047 -10.678 -7.536 10.675 7.533 -0.675 -0.478 0.675 0.478 Horizontal Fx kN 1.857 1.306 -1.855 -1.303 -6.732 -4.753 6.73 4.751 -0.426 -0.301 0.426 0.301 Vertical Fy kN -18.285 -26.555 21.632 29.902 20.177 14.289 -19.828 -13.94 0.131 14.289 0.218 -13.94 Vertical Fy kN -11.202 -16.418 13.973 19.189 12.784 9.075 -12.437 -8.728 0.151 9.075 0.196 -8.728 Horizontal Fz kN -0.02 2.05 0.023 -2.047 0 -0.478 0 0.478 0.02 -7.536 -0.023 7.533 Horizontal Fz kN -0.01 1.306 0.012 -1.303 0 -0.301 0 0.301 0.01 -4.753 -0.012 4.751 Mx kNm -0.061 2.102 0.07 -2.093 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Moment My kNm 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Moment My kNm 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mz kNm -3.036 -2.102 3.027 2.093 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reaction of RT Pole 6m (V160) Node 1 Service Wind WIND 0 DEG WIND 45 DEG WIND 180 DEG WIND 275 DEG WIND 0 DEG WIND 45 DEG WIND 180 DEG WIND 275 DEG WIND 0 DEG WIND 45 DEG WIND 180 DEG WIND 275 DEG Mx kNm -0.031 1.375 0.037 -1.369 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mz kNm -1.977 -1.375 1.971 1.369 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1.5m
x z
Node 1 N 6M 1.5m Node 5 Node 4
Site Code:
YGN-0072
P1
P2
P3
P4
MTE engineerig Co.,Ltd.
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
SITE CODE: YGN-0072 SITE OWNER: SITE ADDRESS: PROPOSED STRUCTURE: position at: 1
20% 10% 0% 1 2 3 4 Column is OK 60% 40% 20% 0% 1 2 3 X-Beam is OK 100% 4
Mu Vu

Tower type: 9M concrete f'c= Steel Fy = X direction Beam check result Type 9M Tripod is OK 2.5 ksi 40 ksi
Mu Vu
50% 0% 1 2 Y-Beam is OK
Mu Vu
3 4
Beam data
Analysis (Etab)
Assume Steel Flexural Shear 2 2 A s (in ) A vs (in /in)
Case Description 1 2 3 4 Beam 1( X direction) Beam 1 (X direction) Beam 1 (X direction) Beam 1 (X direction)
cover(in M u (kip- V u in) (kip) W (in) D (in) ) 9 9 9 9 14 14 14 14
Check result D/C stress D/C stress ratio ratio (moment) (Shear) 39% 29% 31% 20% 39% OK OK 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
2 153 8.6 0.94 0.017 2 113 6.5 0.94 0.017 2 120 4 0.94 0.017 2 78 3 0.94 0.017 Max. D/C Stress ratio of Beam 1 (X direction) conclustion for X direction beam
Y direction Beam check result Type 9M
Beam data
Analysis (Etab)
Assume Steel Flexural Shear 2 2 A s (in ) A vs (in /in)
Case Description 1 2 3 4 Beam 2( Y direction) Beam 2 (Y direction) Beam 2( Y direction) Beam 2 (Y direction)
cover(in M (kip- V u u in) W (in) D (in) ) (kip) 9 9 9 9 12 12 12 12
Check result D/C stress D/C stress ratio ratio (moment) (Shear) 15% 58% 49% 31% 58% OK OK 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
2 47 2.6 0.62 0.021 2 185 5 0.62 0.021 2 156 4 0.62 0.021 2 100 4 0.62 0.021 Max. D/C Stress ratio of Beam 2 (Y direction) conclustion for Y direction beam
Column check case Type 9M Load Case Description 1 2 3 4 Column check for Column check for Column check for Column check for
Column Data
Analysis (Etab)
Assume Steel M uy Flexural Shear (kip-in) A s (in 2 ) A vs (in 2 /in) 31 1.25 0.013 23 1.25 0.013 23 1.25 0.013 16 1.25 0.013 Max. D/C Stress ratio of Column conclustion for Column
Check result D/C stress ratio (moment) 15% 17% 13% 18% 18% OK OK D/C stress ratio (Shear) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
M ux D (in) V (kip) (kip-in) P (kip) W (in) u 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 0.3 0.24 0.2 0.2 7.7 8 8 15 10 29 16 14
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: 9M is OK Remarks, The Max. D/C ratio of the Column is 18% (Moment) according to Load case 4 And 0% D/C ( shear)with load Case all The Max. D/C ratio of the X beam is 39% (Moment) according to Load case 1 And 0% D/C ( shear)with load Case all The Max. D/C ratio of the Y beam is 58% (Moment) according to Load case 2 And 0% D/C ( shear)with load Case all
(signed and sealed by structural engineer) STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
MTE engineering
RECTANGULAR CONCRETE BEAM/SECTION ANALYSIS

Flexure, Shear, Crack Control, and Inertia for Singly or Doubly Reinforced Sections Per ACI 318-99 Code Case STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS Subject: 9M Beam 1( X direction) 1 YGN-0072 Originator: Nyunt Nyunt Checker: KTR
Job Name: Job Number: position at: 1

Input Data:
Beam or Slab Section? Exterior or Interior Exposure? Reinforcing Yield Strength, fy = Concrete Comp. Strength, f 'c = Beam Width, b = Depth to Tension Reinforcing, d = Total Beam Depth, h = Tension Reinforcing, As = No. of Tension Bars in Beam, Nb = Tension Reinf. Bar Spacing, s1 = Clear Cover to Tension Reinf., Cc = Depth to Compression Reinf., d' = Compression Reinforcing, A's = Working Stress Moment, Ma =
Ultimate Design Moment, Mu =
Ultimate Design Shear, Vu = Total Stirrup Area, Av(stirrup) = Tie/Stirrup Spacing, s2 =

Results:
Beam Exterior 40 2.5 9.000 12.500 14.000 0.935 3.000 3.000 1.500 2.000 0.935 8.93 12.75 8.60 0.100 5.8824
ksi ksi in. in. in. in.^2
As
Singly Reinforced Section

d'=2'' A's =0.935 h=14'' d=12.5'' b=9''
in. in. in. in.^2 ft-kips ft-kips kips in.^2 in.
As=0.935
Doubly Reinforced Section
Moment Capacity Check for Beam-Type Section: 1 = 0.85 c= 2.089 in. a= 1.775 in. b = 0.03093 (prov) = 0.00831 (min) = 0.00500 As(min) = 0.563 in.^2 <= As = 0.94 in.^2, O.K. (temp) = N.A. (total for section) As(temp) = N.A. in.^2/face (max) = 0.03151 As(max) = 3.545 in.^2 >= As = 0.94 in.^2, O.K. f 's = 3.69 ksi (A's does not yield) Mn = 39% 32.29 ft-k >= Mu = 12.75 ft-k, O.K. Shear Capacity Check for Beam-Type Section: Vc = 9.56 kips Vs = 7.23 kips Vn = Vc+Vs = 16.79 kips >= Vu = 8.6 kips, O.K. Vs(max) = 38.25 kips >= Vu-(phi)Vc = 0 kips, O.K. Av(prov) = 0.100 in.^2 = Av(stirrup) 0% Av(req'd) = 0.000 in.^2 <= Av(prov) = 0.1 in.^2, O.K. Av(min) = 0.066 in.^2 <= Av(prov) = 0.1 in.^2, O.K. s2(max) = 6.250 in. >= s2 = 5.88 in., O.K. Comments: The D/C stress ratio for Moment is 39% and the D/C Shear Stress Ratio is 0 %
Crack Control (Distribution of Reinf.): Per ACI 318-99 Code: Es = 29000 ksi Ec = 2850 ksi n= 10.18 n = Es/Ec fs = 10.32 ksi fs(used) = 10.32 ksi s1(max) = 41.88 in. >= s1 = 3 in., O.K. Per ACI 318-95 Code: dc = 1.5000 in. z= 24.56 k/in. z(allow) = 145.00 k/in. >= z = 24.56 k/in.,
O.K.
Moment of Inertia for Deflection: fr = 0.375 ksi kd = 3.8448 in. Ig = 2058.00 in.^4 Mcr = 9.19 ft-k Icr = 912.47 in.^4 Ie = 2058.00 in.^4 (for deflection)
MTE engineering


Input Data:

Results:
Beam Exterior 40 2.5 9.000 12.500 14.000 0.935 3.000 3.000 1.500 2.000 0.935 6.59 9.42 6.50 0.100 5.8824
As

d'=2'' A's =0.935 h=14'' d=12.5'' b=9''
As=0.935
Moment Capacity Check for Beam-Type Section: 1 = 0.85 c= 2.089 in. a= 1.775 in. b = 0.03093 (prov) = 0.00831 (min) = 0.00500 As(min) = 0.563 in.^2 <= As = 0.94 in.^2, O.K. (temp) = N.A. (total for section) As(temp) = N.A. in.^2/face (max) = 0.03151 As(max) = 3.545 in.^2 >= As = 0.94 in.^2, O.K. f 's = 3.69 ksi (A's does not yield) Mn = 29% 32.29 ft-k >= Mu = 9.42 ft-k, O.K. Shear Capacity Check for Beam-Type Section: Vc = 9.56 kips Vs = 7.23 kips Vn = Vc+Vs = 16.79 kips >= Vu = 6.5 kips, O.K. Vs(max) = 38.25 kips >= Vu-(phi)Vc = 0 kips, O.K. Av(prov) = 0.100 in.^2 = Av(stirrup) 0% Av(req'd) = 0.000 in.^2 <= Av(prov) = 0.1 in.^2, O.K. Av(min) = 0.066 in.^2 <= Av(prov) = 0.1 in.^2, O.K. s2(max) = 6.250 in. >= s2 = 5.88 in., O.K. Comments: The D/C stress ratio for Moment is 29% and the D/C Shear Stress Ratio is 0 %
O.K.
MTE Engineering


Input Data:

Results:
Beam Exterior 40 2.5 9.000 12.500 14.000 0.935 3.000 3.000 1.500 2.000 0.935 7.00 10.00 4.00 0.100 5.8824
As

d'=2'' A's =0.935 h=14'' d=12.5'' b=9''
As=0.935
Moment Capacity Check for Beam-Type Section: 1 = 0.85 c= 2.089 in. a= 1.775 in. b = 0.03093 (prov) = 0.00831 (min) = 0.00500 As(min) = 0.563 in.^2 <= As = 0.94 in.^2, O.K. (temp) = N.A. (total for section) As(temp) = N.A. in.^2/face (max) = 0.03151 As(max) = 3.545 in.^2 >= As = 0.94 in.^2, O.K. f 's = 3.69 ksi (A's does not yield) Mn = 31% 32.29 ft-k >= Mu = 10 ft-k, O.K.
Crack Control (Distribution of Reinf.): Per ACI 318-99 Code: Es = 29000 ksi Ec = 2850 ksi n= 10.18 n = Es/Ec fs = 8.09 ksi fs(used) = 8.09 ksi s1(max) = 53.39 in. >= s1 = 3 in., O.K. Per ACI 318-95 Code: dc = 1.5000 in. z= 19.27 k/in. z(allow) = 145.00 k/in.
>= z = 19.27 k/in., O.K.
Shear Capacity Check for Beam-Type Section: Moment of Inertia for Deflection: Vc = 9.56 kips fr = 0.375 ksi Vs = 7.23 kips kd = 3.8448 in. Vn = Vc+Vs = Ig = 2058.00 in.^4 16.79 kips >= Vu = 4 kips, O.K. Vs(max) = 38.25 kips >= Vu-(phi)Vc = 0 kips, O.K. Mcr = 9.19 ft-k Icr = 912.47 in.^4 Av(prov) = 0.100 in.^2 = Av(stirrup) Ie = 2058.00 in.^4 (for deflection) 0% Av(req'd) = 0.000 in.^2 <= Av(prov) = 0.1 in.^2, O.K. Av(min) = 0.000 in.^2 <= Av(prov) = 0.1 in.^2, O.K. s2(max) = N.A. in. Comments: The D/C stress ratio for Moment is 31% and the D/C Shear Stress Ratio is 0 %
MTE Engineering


Input Data:

Results:
Beam Exterior 40 2.5 9.000 12.500 14.000 0.935 3.000 3.000 1.500 2.000 0.935 4.55 6.50 3.00 0.100 5.8824
As

d'=2'' A's =0.935 h=14'' d=12.5'' b=9''
As=0.935
Moment Capacity Check for Beam-Type Section: 1 = 0.85 c= 2.089 in. a= 1.775 in. b = 0.03093 (prov) = 0.00831 (min) = 0.00500 As(min) = 0.563 in.^2 <= As = 0.94 in.^2, O.K. (temp) = N.A. (total for section) As(temp) = N.A. in.^2/face (max) = 0.03151 As(max) = 3.545 in.^2 >= As = 0.94 in.^2, O.K. f 's = 3.69 ksi (A's does not yield) Mn = 20% 32.29 ft-k >= Mu = 6.5 ft-k, O.K. Shear Capacity Check for Beam-Type Section: Vc = 9.56 kips Vs = 7.23 kips Vn = Vc+Vs = 16.79 kips >= Vu = 3 kips, O.K. Vs(max) = 38.25 kips >= Vu-(phi)Vc = 0 kips, O.K. Av(prov) = 0.100 in.^2 = Av(stirrup) 0% Av(req'd) = 0.000 in.^2 <= Av(prov) = 0.1 in.^2, O.K. Av(min) = 0.000 in.^2 <= Av(prov) = 0.1 in.^2, O.K. s2(max) = N.A. in. Comments: The D/C stress ratio for Moment is 20% and the D/C Shear Stress Ratio is 0 %
>= z = 12.52 k/in., O.K.
MTE Engineering

Flexure, Shear, Crack Control, and Inertia for Singly or Doubly Reinforced Sections Per ACI 318-99 Code STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS Subject: 9M Beam 2( Y direction) YGN-0072 Originator: Nyunt Nyunt Checker:
Case
1 KTR

Input Data:

Results:
Beam Exterior 40 2.5 9.000 10.500 12.000 0.935 2.000 3.000 1.500 2.000 0.935 2.74 3.92 2.60 0.100 5.8824
As

d'=2'' A's =0.935 h=12'' d=10.5'' b=9''
As=0.935
Moment Capacity Check for Beam-Type Section: 1 = 0.85 c= 2.089 in. a= 1.775 in. b = 0.03093 (prov) = 0.00989 (min) = 0.00500 As(min) = 0.473 in.^2 <= As = 0.94 in.^2, O.K. (temp) = N.A. (total for section) As(temp) = N.A. in.^2/face (max) = 0.03310 As(max) = 3.127 in.^2 >= As = 0.94 in.^2, O.K. f 's = 3.69 ksi (A's does not yield) Mn = 15% 26.68 ft-k >= Mu = 3.92 ft-k, O.K.
O.K.
Shear Capacity Check for Beam-Type Section: Moment of Inertia for Deflection: Vc = 8.03 kips fr = 0.375 ksi Vs = 6.07 kips kd = 3.4719 in. Vn = Vc+Vs = Ig = 1296.00 in.^4 14.10 kips >= Vu = 2.6 kips, O.K. Vs(max) = 32.13 kips >= Vu-(phi)Vc = 0 kips, O.K. Mcr = 6.75 ft-k I cr = Av(prov) = 0.100 in.^2 = Av(stirrup) 614.11 in.^4 Ie = 1296.00 in.^4 (for deflection) 0% Av(req'd) = 0.000 in.^2 <= Av(prov) = 0.1 in.^2, O.K. Av(min) = 0.000 in.^2 <= Av(prov) = 0.1 in.^2, O.K. s2(max) = N.A. in. Comments: The D/C stress ratio for Moment is 15% and the D/C Shear Stress Ratio is 0 %
MTE Engineering

Flexure, Shear, Crack Control, and Inertia for Singly or Doubly Reinforced Sections Per ACI 318-99 Code STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS Subject: 9M Beam 2( Y direction) YGN-0072 Originator: Nyunt Nyunt Checker: KTR
Case
2

Input Data:

Results:
Beam Exterior 40 2.5 9.000 10.500 12.000 0.935 2.000 3.000 1.500 2.000 0.935 10.79 15.42 5.00 0.100 5.8824
As

d'=2'' A's =0.935 h=12'' d=10.5'' b=9''
As=0.935
Doubly Reinforced Section Warning: s2 > s2(max) allowed!
Moment Capacity Check for Beam-Type Section: 1 = 0.85 c= 2.089 in. a= 1.775 in. b = 0.03093 (prov) = 0.00989 (min) = 0.00500 As(min) = 0.473 in.^2 <= As = 0.94 in.^2, O.K. (temp) = N.A. (total for section) As(temp) = N.A. in.^2/face (max) = 0.03310 As(max) = 3.127 in.^2 >= As = 0.94 in.^2, O.K. f 's = 3.69 ksi (A's does not yield) Mn = 58% 26.68 ft-k >= Mu = 15.42 ft-k, O.K.
>= z = 40.84 k/in., O.K.
Shear Capacity Check for Beam-Type Section: Moment of Inertia for Deflection: Vc = 8.03 kips fr = 0.375 ksi Vs = 6.07 kips kd = 3.4719 in. Vn = Vc+Vs = Ig = 1296.00 in.^4 14.10 kips >= Vu = 5 kips, O.K. Vs(max) = 32.13 kips >= Vu-(phi)Vc = 0 kips, O.K. Mcr = 6.75 ft-k Icr = 614.11 in.^4 Av(prov) = 0.100 in.^2 = Av(stirrup) Ie = 780.97 in.^4 (for deflection) 0% Av(req'd) = 0.000 in.^2 <= Av(prov) = 0.1 in.^2, O.K. Av(min) = 0.066 in.^2 <= Av(prov) = 0.1 in.^2, O.K. s2(max) = 5.250 in. < s2 = 5.88 in., N.G. Comments: The D/C stress ratio for Moment is 58% and the D/C Shear Stress Ratio is 0 %
MTE Engineering

Flexure, Shear, Crack Control, and Inertia for Singly or Doubly Reinforced Sections Per ACI 318-99 Code Case Job Name: STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS Subject: 9M Beam 2( Y direction) 3 Job Number: YGN-0072 Originator: Nyunt Nyunt Checker: KTR
position at:
Input Data:
1
b

Results:
Beam Exterior 40 2.5 9.000 10.500 12.000 0.935 2.000 3.000 1.500 2.000 0.935 9.10 13.00 4.00 0.100 5.8824
As

d'=2'' A's =0.935 h=12'' d=10.5'' b=9''
As=0.935
Moment Capacity Check for Beam-Type Section: 1 = 0.85 c= 2.089 in. a= 1.775 in. b = 0.03093 (prov) = 0.00989 (min) = 0.00500 As(min) = 0.473 in.^2 <= As = 0.94 in.^2, O.K. (temp) = N.A. (total for section) As(temp) = N.A. in.^2/face (max) = 0.03310 As(max) = 3.127 in.^2 >= As = 0.94 in.^2, O.K. f 's = 3.69 ksi (A's does not yield) Mn = 49% 26.68 ft-k >= Mu = 13 ft-k, O.K. Shear Capacity Check for Beam-Type Section: Vc = 8.03 kips Vs = 6.07 kips Vn = Vc+Vs = 14.10 kips >= Vu = 4 kips, O.K. Vs(max) = 32.13 kips >= Vu-(phi)Vc = 0 kips, O.K. Av(prov) = 0.100 in.^2 = Av(stirrup) 0% Av(req'd) = 0.000 in.^2 <= Av(prov) = 0.1 in.^2, O.K. Av(min) = 0.000 in.^2 <= Av(prov) = 0.1 in.^2, O.K. s2(max) = N.A. in. Comments: The D/C stress ratio for Moment is 49% and the D/C Shear Stress Ratio is 0 %
O.K.
MTE Engineering

Flexure, Shear, Crack Control, and Inertia for Singly or Doubly Reinforced Sections Per ACI 318-99 Code Case STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS Subject: 9M Beam 2( Y direction) 4 YGN-0072 Originator: Nyunt Nyunt Checker: KTR

Input Data:

Results:
Beam Exterior 40 2.5 9.000 10.500 12.000 0.935 2.000 3.000 1.500 2.000 0.935 5.83 8.33 4.00 0.100 5.8824
As

d'=2'' A's =0.935 h=12'' d=10.5'' b=9''
As=0.935
Moment Capacity Check for Beam-Type Section: 1 = 0.85 c= 2.089 in. a= 1.775 in. b = 0.03093 (prov) = 0.00989 (min) = 0.00500 As(min) = 0.473 in.^2 <= As = 0.94 in.^2, O.K. (temp) = N.A. (total for section) As(temp) = N.A. in.^2/face (max) = 0.03310 As(max) = 3.127 in.^2 >= As = 0.94 in.^2, O.K. f 's = 3.69 ksi (A's does not yield) Mn = 31% 26.68 ft-k >= Mu = 8.33 ft-k, O.K. Shear Capacity Check for Beam-Type Section: Vc = 8.03 kips Vs = 6.07 kips Vn = Vc+Vs = 14.10 kips >= Vu = 4 kips, O.K. Vs(max) = 32.13 kips >= Vu-(phi)Vc = 0 kips, O.K. Av(prov) = 0.100 in.^2 = Av(stirrup) 0% Av(req'd) = 0.000 in.^2 <= Av(prov) = 0.1 in.^2, O.K. Av(min) = 0.000 in.^2 <= Av(prov) = 0.1 in.^2, O.K. s2(max) = N.A. in. Comments: The D/C stress ratio for Moment is 31% and the D/C Shear Stress Ratio is 0 %
O.K.
MTE Engineering
RECTANGULAR CONCRETE BEAM/COLUMN ANALYSIS

For Biaxial Flexure with Axial Compression or Tension Load Assuming "Short", Non-Slender Member with Symmetric Reinforcing (per ACI 318-99 Code) Job Name: STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS Subject: 9M Column check case Job Number: YGN-0072 Originator: Nyunt Nyun Checker: KTR position at: 1 Case 1 Input Data:
400
X-AXIS INTERACTION DIAGRAM

400
Y-AXIS INTERACTION DIAGRAM
350
350
300
300
250
250
Reinforcing Yield Strength, fy = Concrete Comp. Strength, f 'c = Total Member Width, Lx = Total Member Depth, Ly = Distance to Long. Reinforcing, d' =
Ultimate Design Axial Load, Pu = Ultimate Design Moment, Mux = Ultimate Design Moment, Muy =
Total Top/Bot. Long. Bars, Ntb = Top/Bot. Longitudinal Bar Size = Total Side Long. Bars, Nsb = Side Longitudinal Bar Size =
Results:
40 2.5 9.000 9.000 2.000 7.70 0.83 2.58 4 5 0 5
ksi. ksi
Lx=9 Y
200
200
in. in. kips ft-kips ft-kips
Pnx (k)
Pny (k)
in.
150
150
X
Nsb=0
100
100
Ly=9
Ntb=4
50
50
0 0 10 20 30 40 50
0 0 -50 10 20 30 40 50
d'=2 (typ.)
-50
Member Section
-100
-100
-150
-150
Gross reinforcing ratio provided: g = 0.01531 X-axis Flexure and Axial Load Interaction Diagram Points Pnx (k) Mnx (ft-k) ey (in.) Comments 170.72 136.58 136.58 104.77 86.87 59.85 53.64 20.25 0.00 -44.64 0.00 0.00 7.99 15.43 17.74 18.75 18.24 12.81 11.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.70 1.77 2.45 3.76 4.08 7.59 (Infinity ) 0.00
-200
Mnx (ft-k)
-200
Mny (ft-k)
Location Point #1 Point #2 Point #3 Point #4 Point #5 Point #6 Point #7 Point #8 Point #9 Point #10
Nom. max. compression = Po

Allowable Pn(max) = 0.8*Po
Min. eccentricity 0% rebar tension = 0 ksi 25% rebar tension = 10 ksi 50% rebar tension = 20 ksi 100% rebar tension = 40 ksi Pn = 0.1*f'c*Ag Pure moment capacity Pure axial tension capacity
Y-axis Flexure and Axial Load Interaction Diagram Points Pny (k) Mny (ft-k) ex (in.) Comments 170.72 136.58 136.58 104.77 86.87 59.85 53.64 20.25 0.00 -44.64 0.00 0.00 7.99 15.43 17.74 18.75 18.24 12.81 11.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.70 1.77 2.45 3.76 4.08 7.59 (Infinity ) 0.00

Member Uniaxial Capacity at Design Eccentricity, ey: Interpolated Results from Above: Pnx (k) Mnx (ft-k) ey (in.) 112.33 12.16 1.30
Member Uniaxial Capacity at Design Eccentricity, ex: Interpolated Results from Above: Pny (k) Mny (ft-k) ex (in.) 54.61 18.32 4.03
Biaxial Capacity and Stress Ratio for Pu >= 0.1*f'c*Ag: kips Pn = 1/(1/Pnx + 1/Pny -1/Po) <= 1.0 Pn = N.A. S.R. = N.A.
S.R. = Pu/Pn <= 1.0
Effective Length Criteria for "Short" Column:
k*Lu <= k*Lu <=
4.95 9.00
ft. (for k*Lu/r(min) <= 22) ft. (for k*Lu/r(min) <= 40)
Column Shear check Vu(Max.)= 0.3 kip Vc = 4.725 kip Req'd AVs=
2 0 in
Biaxial Stress Ratio for Pu < 0.1*f'c*Ag: S.R. = (Mux/Mnx)^1.15 + (Muy/Mny)^1.15 <= 1.0 15% S.R. = 0.151
Pure Axial Compression Capacity w/o Reinf.: Pn = 96.39 kips Pn = 0.80*0.70*(0.85*f'c*Ag)
Tie Min. Size & Max. Spac.: #3@9'' 0.00%
MTE Engineering

400

400
350
350
300
300
250
250
Results:
40 2.5 9.000 9.000 2.000 8.00 2.42 1.92 4 5 0 5
ksi. ksi
Lx=9 Y
200
200
Pnx (k)
100
Pny (k)
0 10 20 30 40 50
in.
150
150
100
X
Nsb=0
Ly=9
Ntb=4
50
50
0 0 -50 10 20 30 40 50
d'=2 (typ.)
-50
Member Section
-100
-100
-150
-150
-200
Mnx (ft-k)
-200
Mny (ft-k)


S.R. = Pu/Pn <= 1.0
k*Lu <= k*Lu <=
4.95 9.00
2 0 in
MTE Engineering

400

400
350
350
300
300
250
250
Results:
40 2.5 9.000 9.000 2.000 8.00 1.33 1.92 4 5 0 5
ksi. ksi
Lx=9 Y
200
200
Pnx (k)
100
Pny (k)
0 10 20 30 40 50
in.
150
150
100
X
Nsb=0
Ly=9
Ntb=4
50
50
0 0 -50 10 20 30 40 50
d'=2 (typ.)
-50
Member Section
-100
-100
-150
-150
-200
Mnx (ft-k)
-200
Mny (ft-k)


S.R. = Pu/Pn <= 1.0
k*Lu <= k*Lu <=
4.95 9.00
2 0 in
MTE Engineering

400

400
350
350
300
300
250
250
Results:
40 2.5 9.000 9.000 2.000 15.00 1.17 1.33 4 5 0 5
ksi. ksi
Lx=9 Y
200
200
Pnx (k)
100
Pny (k)
0 10 20 30 40 50
in.
150
150
100
X
Nsb=0
Ly=9
Ntb=4
50
50
0 0 -50 10 20 30 40 50
d'=2 (typ.)
-50
Member Section
-100
-100
-150
-150
-200
Mnx (ft-k)
-200
Mny (ft-k)


S.R. = Pu/Pn <= 1.0
k*Lu <= k*Lu <=
4.95 9.00
2 0 in
MTE engineerig Co.,Ltd.
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
100%
SITE CODE: YGN-0072 SITE OWNER: SITE ADDRESS: PROPOSED STRUCTURE: position at: 1
20% 10% 0% 1 2 3 4 Column is OK
50% 0% 1 2 3 4
Mu Vu
X-Beam is OK

Tower type: 6M concrete f'c= Steel Fy = X direction Beam check result Type 6M Case Description 1 Beam 1( X direction) 2 Beam 1 (X direction) 3 Beam 1 (X direction) 4 Beam 1 (X direction) Tripod 2.5 ksi 40 ksi
100%
Mu Vu
50% 0% 1 2 3 Y-Beam is OK 4
Mu Vu
Beam data W (in) D (in) 9 14 9 14 9 14 9 14
Analysis (Etab) Assume Steel Check result Flexural Shear M u (kip- V u ratio ratio cover(in) in) (kip) A s (in 2 ) A vs (in 2 /in) (moment) (Shear) 2 0 0 0.94 0.017 0% 2 0 0 0.94 0.017 0% 2 0 0 0.94 0.017 0% 2 0 0 0.94 0.017 0% 0% Max. D/C Stress ratio of Beam 1 (X direction) OK OK conclustion for X direction beam
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Y direction Beam check result Type 6M Case Description 1 Beam 2( Y direction) 2 Beam 2 (Y direction) 3 Beam 2( Y direction) 4 Beam 2 (Y direction)
Beam data W (in) D (in) 9 12 9 12 9 12 9 12
Analysis (Etab) Assume Steel Check result Flexural Shear M u (kip- V u ratio ratio cover(in) in) (kip) A s (in 2 ) A vs (in 2 /in) (moment) (Shear) 2 0 0 0.62 0.021 0% 2 0 0 0.62 0.021 0% 2 0 0 0.62 0.021 0% 2 0 0 0.62 0.021 0% 0% Max. D/C Stress ratio of Beam 2 (Y direction) OK OK conclustion for Y direction beam
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Column check case Type 6M Load Case Description 1 2 3 4 Column check for Column check for Column check for Column check for
Analysis (Etab) Assume Steel Check result M ux M uy Flexural Shear ratio ratio 2 2 W (in) D (in) V (kip) P u (kip) (kip-in) (kip-in) A s (in ) A vs (in /in) (moment) (Shear) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 0.24 0.15 0.1 0.1 8 8 8 12.7 29 20 12 10 23 1.25 0.013 16 1.25 0.013 8.3 1.25 0.013 10.5 1.25 0.013 Max. D/C Stress ratio of Column conclustion for Column 17% 12% 9% 14% 17% OK OK 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Column Data
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: 6M is OK Remarks, The Max. D/C ratio of the Column is 17% (Moment) according to Load case 1 And 0% D/C ( shear)with load Case all The Max. D/C ratio of the X beam is 0% (Moment) according to Load case 4 And 0% D/C ( shear)with load Case all The Max. D/C ratio of the Y beam is 0% (Moment) according to Load case 4 And 0% D/C ( shear)with load Case all
(signed and sealed by structural engineer) STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
MTE engineering

Flexure, Shear, Crack Control, and Inertia for Singly or Doubly Reinforced Sections Per ACI 318-99 Code STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS Subject: 6M Beam 1( X direction) YGN-0072 Originator: Nyunt Nyunt Checker:
Case
1 KTR
Job Name: Job Number:

Input Data:

Results:
Beam Exterior 40 2.5 9.000 12.500 14.000 0.935 3.000 3.000 1.500 2.000 0.935 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.100 5.8824
As

d'=2'' A's =0.935 h=14'' d=12.5'' b=9''
As=0.935
#DIV/0! Moment Capacity Check for Beam-Type Section: 1 = 0.85 c= 2.089 in. a= 1.775 in. b = 0.03093 (prov) = 0.00831 (min) = 0.00500 As(min) = 0.563 in.^2 <= As = 0.94 in.^2, O.K. (temp) = N.A. (total for section) As(temp) = N.A. in.^2/face (max) = 0.03151 As(max) = 3.545 in.^2 >= As = 0.94 in.^2, O.K. f 's = 3.69 ksi (A's does not yield) Mn = 0% 32.29 ft-k >= Mu = 0 ft-k, O.K. Shear Capacity Check for Beam-Type Section: Vc = 9.56 kips Vs = 7.23 kips Vn = Vc+Vs = 16.79 kips >= Vu = 0 kips, O.K. Vs(max) = 38.25 kips >= Vu-(phi)Vc = 0 kips, O.K. Av(prov) = 0.100 in.^2 = Av(stirrup) 0% Av(req'd) = 0.000 in.^2 <= Av(prov) = 0.1 in.^2, O.K. Av(min) = 0.000 in.^2 <= Av(prov) = 0.1 in.^2, O.K. s2(max) = N.A. in. Comments: The D/C stress ratio for Moment is 0% and the D/C Shear Stress Ratio is 0 % Crack Control (Distribution of Reinf.): Per ACI 318-99 Code: Es = 29000 ksi Ec = 2850 ksi n= 10.18 n = Es/Ec fs = 0.00 ksi fs(used) = 0.00 ksi s1(max) = #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Per ACI 318-95 Code: dc = 1.5000 in. z= 0.00 k/in. z(allow) = 145.00 k/in. >= z = 0 k/in.,
O.K.
Moment of Inertia for Deflection: fr = 0.375 ksi kd = 3.8448 in. Ig = 2058.00 in.^4 Mcr = 9.19 ft-k Icr = 912.47 in.^4 Ie = #DIV/0! in.^4 (for deflection)
MTE engineering

Case
2 KTR

Input Data:

Results:
Beam Exterior 40 2.5 9.000 12.500 14.000 0.935 3.000 3.000 1.500 2.000 0.935 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.100 5.8824
As

d'=2'' A's =0.935 h=14'' d=12.5'' b=9''
As=0.935
#DIV/0! Moment Capacity Check for Beam-Type Section: 1 = 0.85 c= 2.089 in. a= 1.775 in. b = 0.03093 (prov) = 0.00831 (min) = 0.00500 As(min) = 0.563 in.^2 <= As = 0.94 in.^2, O.K. (temp) = N.A. (total for section) As(temp) = N.A. in.^2/face (max) = 0.03151 As(max) = 3.545 in.^2 >= As = 0.94 in.^2, O.K. f 's = 3.69 ksi (A's does not yield) Mn = 0% 32.29 ft-k >= Mu = 0 ft-k, O.K. Shear Capacity Check for Beam-Type Section: Vc = 9.56 kips Vs = 7.23 kips Vn = Vc+Vs = 16.79 kips >= Vu = 0 kips, O.K. Vs(max) = 38.25 kips >= Vu-(phi)Vc = 0 kips, O.K. Av(prov) = 0.100 in.^2 = Av(stirrup) 0% Av(req'd) = 0.000 in.^2 <= Av(prov) = 0.1 in.^2, O.K. Av(min) = 0.000 in.^2 <= Av(prov) = 0.1 in.^2, O.K. s2(max) = N.A. in. Comments: The D/C stress ratio for Moment is 0% and the D/C Shear Stress Ratio is 0 % Crack Control (Distribution of Reinf.): Per ACI 318-99 Code: Es = 29000 ksi Ec = 2850 ksi n= 10.18 n = Es/Ec fs = 0.00 ksi fs(used) = 0.00 ksi s1(max) = #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Per ACI 318-95 Code: dc = 1.5000 in. z= 0.00 k/in. z(allow) = 145.00 k/in.
>= z = 0 k/in., O.K.
MTE Engineering


Input Data:

Results:
Beam Exterior 40 2.5 9.000 12.500 14.000 0.935 3.000 3.000 1.500 2.000 0.935 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.100 5.8824
As

d'=2'' A's =0.935 h=14'' d=12.5'' b=9''
As=0.935
>= z = 0 k/in., O.K.
MTE Engineering

Case
4 KTR

Input Data:

Results:
Beam Exterior 40 2.5 9.000 12.500 14.000 0.935 3.000 3.000 1.500 2.000 0.935 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.100 5.8824
As

d'=2'' A's =0.935 h=14'' d=12.5'' b=9''
As=0.935
>= z = 0 k/in., O.K.
MTE Engineering

Case
1 KTR

Input Data:

Results:
Beam Exterior 40 2.5 9.000 10.500 12.000 0.935 2.000 3.000 1.500 2.000 0.935 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.100 5.8824
As

d'=2'' A's =0.935 h=12'' d=10.5'' b=9''
As=0.935
#DIV/0! Moment Capacity Check for Beam-Type Section: 1 = 0.85 c= 2.089 in. a= 1.775 in. b = 0.03093 (prov) = 0.00989 (min) = 0.00500 As(min) = 0.473 in.^2 <= As = 0.94 in.^2, O.K. (temp) = N.A. (total for section) As(temp) = N.A. in.^2/face (max) = 0.03310 As(max) = 3.127 in.^2 >= As = 0.94 in.^2, O.K. f 's = 3.69 ksi (A's does not yield) Mn = 0% 26.68 ft-k >= Mu = 0 ft-k, O.K. Crack Control (Distribution of Reinf.): Per ACI 318-99 Code: Es = 29000 ksi Ec = 2850 ksi n= 10.18 n = Es/Ec fs = 0.00 ksi fs(used) = 0.00 ksi s1(max) = #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Per ACI 318-95 Code: dc = 1.5000 in. z= 0.00 k/in. z(allow) = 145.00 k/in.
>= z = 0 k/in., O.K.
Shear Capacity Check for Beam-Type Section: Moment of Inertia for Deflection: Vc = 8.03 kips fr = 0.375 ksi Vs = 6.07 kips kd = 3.4719 in. Vn = Vc+Vs = Ig = 1296.00 in.^4 14.10 kips >= Vu = 0 kips, O.K. Vs(max) = 32.13 kips >= Vu-(phi)Vc = 0 kips, O.K. Mcr = 6.75 ft-k Icr = 614.11 in.^4 Av(prov) = 0.100 in.^2 = Av(stirrup) Ie = #DIV/0! in.^4 (for deflection) 0% Av(req'd) = 0.000 in.^2 <= Av(prov) = 0.1 in.^2, O.K. Av(min) = 0.000 in.^2 <= Av(prov) = 0.1 in.^2, O.K. s2(max) = N.A. in. Comments: The D/C stress ratio for Moment is 0% and the D/C Shear Stress Ratio is 0 %
MTE Engineering

Case
2 KTR

Input Data:

Results:
Beam Exterior 40 2.5 9.000 10.500 12.000 0.935 2.000 3.000 1.500 2.000 0.935 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.100 5.8824
As

d'=2'' A's =0.935 h=12'' d=10.5'' b=9''
As=0.935
#DIV/0! Moment Capacity Check for Beam-Type Section: 1 = 0.85 c= 2.089 in. a= 1.775 in. b = 0.03093 (prov) = 0.00989 (min) = 0.00500 As(min) = 0.473 in.^2 <= As = 0.94 in.^2, O.K. (temp) = N.A. (total for section) As(temp) = N.A. in.^2/face (max) = 0.03310 As(max) = 3.127 in.^2 >= As = 0.94 in.^2, O.K. f 's = 3.69 ksi (A's does not yield) Mn = 0% 26.68 ft-k >= Mu = 0 ft-k, O.K. Crack Control (Distribution of Reinf.): Per ACI 318-99 Code: Es = 29000 ksi Ec = 2850 ksi n= 10.18 n = Es/Ec fs = 0.00 ksi fs(used) = 0.00 ksi s1(max) = #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Per ACI 318-95 Code: dc = 1.5000 in. z= 0.00 k/in. z(allow) = 145.00 k/in.
>= z = 0 k/in., O.K.
Shear Capacity Check for Beam-Type Section: Moment of Inertia for Deflection: Vc = kips 8.03 fr = 0.375 ksi Vs = 6.07 kips kd = 3.4719 in. Vn = Vc+Vs = Ig = 1296.00 in.^4 14.10 kips >= Vu = 0 kips, O.K. Vs(max) = 32.13 kips >= Vu-(phi)Vc = 0 kips, O.K. Mcr = 6.75 ft-k Icr = 614.11 in.^4 Av(prov) = 0.100 in.^2 = Av(stirrup) Ie = #DIV/0! in.^4 (for deflection) 0% Av(req'd) = 0.000 in.^2 <= Av(prov) = 0.1 in.^2, O.K. Av(min) = 0.000 in.^2 <= Av(prov) = 0.1 in.^2, O.K. s2(max) = N.A. in. Comments: The D/C stress ratio for Moment is 0% and the D/C Shear Stress Ratio is 0 %
MTE Engineering

Case
3 KTR

Input Data:

Results:
Beam Exterior 40 2.5 9.000 10.500 12.000 0.935 2.000 3.000 1.500 2.000 0.935 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.100 5.8824
As

d'=2'' A's =0.935 h=12'' d=10.5'' b=9''
As=0.935
#DIV/0! Moment Capacity Check for Beam-Type Section: 1 = 0.85 c= 2.089 in. a= 1.775 in. b = 0.03093 (prov) = 0.00989 (min) = 0.00500 As(min) = 0.473 in.^2 <= As = 0.94 in.^2, O.K. (temp) = N.A. (total for section) As(temp) = N.A. in.^2/face (max) = 0.03310 As(max) = 3.127 in.^2 >= As = 0.94 in.^2, O.K. f 's = 3.69 ksi (A's does not yield) Mn = 0% 26.68 ft-k >= Mu = 0 ft-k, O.K. Shear Capacity Check for Beam-Type Section: Vc = 8.03 kips Vs = 6.07 kips Vn = Vc+Vs = 14.10 kips >= Vu = 0 kips, O.K. Vs(max) = 32.13 kips >= Vu-(phi)Vc = 0 kips, O.K. Av(prov) = 0.100 in.^2 = Av(stirrup) 0% Av(req'd) = 0.000 in.^2 <= Av(prov) = 0.1 in.^2, O.K. Av(min) = 0.000 in.^2 <= Av(prov) = 0.1 in.^2, O.K. s2(max) = N.A. in. Comments: The D/C stress ratio for Moment is 0% and the D/C Shear Stress Ratio is 0 %
Crack Control (Distribution of Reinf.): Per ACI 318-99 Code: Es = 29000 ksi Ec = 2850 ksi n= 10.18 n = Es/Ec fs = 0.00 ksi fs(used) = 0.00 ksi s1(max) = #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Per ACI 318-95 Code: dc = 1.5000 in. z= 0.00 k/in. z(allow) = 145.00 k/in.
>= z = 0 k/in., O.K.
MTE Engineering

Case
4 KTR

Input Data:

Results:
Beam Exterior 40 2.5 9.000 10.500 12.000 0.935 2.000 3.000 1.500 2.000 0.935 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.100 5.8824
As

d'=2'' A's =0.935 h=12'' d=10.5'' b=9''
As=0.935
#DIV/0! Moment Capacity Check for Beam-Type Section: 1 = 0.85 c= 2.089 in. a= 1.775 in. b = 0.03093 (prov) = 0.00989 (min) = 0.00500 As(min) = 0.473 in.^2 <= As = 0.94 in.^2, O.K. (temp) = N.A. (total for section) As(temp) = N.A. in.^2/face (max) = 0.03310 As(max) = 3.127 in.^2 >= As = 0.94 in.^2, O.K. f 's = 3.69 ksi (A's does not yield) Mn = 0% 26.68 ft-k >= Mu = 0 ft-k, O.K. Shear Capacity Check for Beam-Type Section: Vc = 8.03 kips Vs = 6.07 kips Vn = Vc+Vs = 14.10 kips >= Vu = 0 kips, O.K. Vs(max) = 32.13 kips >= Vu-(phi)Vc = 0 kips, O.K. Av(prov) = 0.100 in.^2 = Av(stirrup) 0% Av(req'd) = 0.000 in.^2 <= Av(prov) = 0.1 in.^2, O.K. Av(min) = 0.000 in.^2 <= Av(prov) = 0.1 in.^2, O.K. s2(max) = N.A. in. Comments: The D/C stress ratio for Moment is 0% and the D/C Shear Stress Ratio is 0 %
Crack Control (Distribution of Reinf.): Per ACI 318-99 Code: Es = 29000 ksi Ec = 2850 ksi n= 10.18 n = Es/Ec fs = 0.00 ksi fs(used) = 0.00 ksi s1(max) = #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Per ACI 318-95 Code: dc = 1.5000 in. z= 0.00 k/in. z(allow) = 145.00 k/in.
>= z = 0 k/in., O.K.
MTE Engineering

For Biaxial Flexure with Axial Compression or Tension Load Assuming "Short", Non-Slender Member with Symmetric Reinforcing (per ACI 318-99 Code) Job Name: STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS Subject: 6M Column check case Job Number: YGN-0072 Originator: Nyunt Nyun Checker: KTR Case 1 Input Data:
400

400
350
350
300
300
250
250
Results:
40 2.5 9.000 9.000 2.000 8.00 2.42 1.92 4 5 0 5
ksi. ksi
Lx=9 Y
200
200
Pnx (k)
100
Pny (k)
0 10 20 30 40 50
in.
150
150
100
X
Nsb=0
Ly=9
Ntb=4
50
50
0 0 -50 10 20 30 40 50
d'=2 (typ.)
-50
Member Section
-100
-100
-150
-150
-200
Mnx (ft-k)
-200
Mny (ft-k)


S.R. = Pu/Pn <= 1.0
k*Lu <= k*Lu <=
4.95 9.00
2 0 in
MTE Engineering

400

400
350
350
300
300
250
250
Results:
40 2.5 9.000 9.000 2.000 8.00 1.67 1.33 4 5 0 5
ksi. ksi
Lx=9 Y
200
200
Pnx (k)
100
Pny (k)
0 10 20 30 40 50
in.
150
150
100
X
Nsb=0
Ly=9
Ntb=4
50
50
0 0 -50 10 20 30 40 50
d'=2 (typ.)
-50
Member Section
-100
-100
-150
-150
-200
Mnx (ft-k)
-200
Mny (ft-k)


S.R. = Pu/Pn <= 1.0
k*Lu <= k*Lu <=
4.95 9.00
2 0 in
MTE Engineering

400

400
350
350
300
300
250
250
Results:
40 2.5 9.000 9.000 2.000 8.00 1.00 0.69 4 5 0 5
ksi. ksi
Lx=9 Y
200
200
Pnx (k)
100
Pny (k)
0 10 20 30 40 50
in.
150
150
100
X
Nsb=0
Ly=9
Ntb=4
50
50
0 0 -50 10 20 30 40 50
d'=2 (typ.)
-50
Member Section
-100
-100
-150
-150
-200
Mnx (ft-k)
-200
Mny (ft-k)


S.R. = Pu/Pn <= 1.0
k*Lu <= k*Lu <=
4.95 9.00
2 0 in
MTE Engineering

400

400
350
350
300
300
250
250
Results:
40 2.5 9.000 9.000 2.000 12.70 0.83 0.88 4 5 0 5
ksi. ksi
Lx=9 Y
200
200
Pnx (k)
100
Pny (k)
0 10 20 30 40 50
in.
150
150
100
X
Nsb=0
Ly=9
Ntb=4
50
50
0 0 -50 10 20 30 40 50
d'=2 (typ.)
-50
Member Section
-100
-100
-150
-150
-200
Mnx (ft-k)
-200
Mny (ft-k)


S.R. = Pu/Pn <= 1.0
k*Lu <= k*Lu <=
4.95 9.00
2 0 in

Telecom Tower Roof Top Analysis Report

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Telecom Tower Roof Top Analysis Report

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Telecom Tower Roof Top Analysis Report

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

What is the structural analysis report assessing?

What is the structural analysis report assessing?

What design considerations and codes are referenced in the analysis?

What design considerations and codes are referenced in the analysis?

MTE Engineering Co.,Ltd.

Fax: 513598, Mobile: 5019332, 5106643, 73042214

Operator Project HUAWEI

SA By Tarabit Wave SA Team ID TW-SA-01 Engineer Mr. Location Map YGN

The building is structurally adequate in its current condition.

6m YES Yes YES YES YES

Tripole, Roof top, 12.8

Height of BLD Roof top

Additional Task work Status The strengthening : the structure modification:

BLd width (m)

Nan Dar B.E ( Civil) Structural Engineer

MTE Engineering Co.,Ltd.

Fax: 513598, Mobile: 5019332, 5106643, 73042214

Operator Project HUAWEI

SA By Tarabit Wave SA Team ID TW-SA-01 Engineer Mr. Location Map YGN

1 Yes/No Yes YES YES

The analysis of the building (data) as per ACI- Steel Minimium

Additional Task work Status The strengthening : the structure modification:

Nan Dar B.E (Civil) Structural Engineer

C9''X9" 4-16mm @section 1-6.5mm @7.5"Tie

B9''X12" 2-16mm @T&B 1-6.5mm @5"

MTE Engineering Co.,Ltd.

Fax: 513598, Mobile: 5019332, 5106643, 73042214

INVESTIGATION REPORT 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4

As per Attached Wind Load reaction data V200 and V160

MTE Engineering Co.,Ltd.

Fax: 513598, Mobile: 5019332, 5106643, 73042214

30 20 10 0 -10 -20 -30 80 60 40 20 0 -20 -40 -60

20 0 -20 -40 -60 1 2 3 4

Fz@Y (9m) Fz@Y(6m)

DN -Fz Max.= + 57.011 kN Up- Fz Max.= -48.827 kN

Fx'@YMax.= +/- 10.377 kN

MTE Engineering Co.,Ltd.

Fax: 513598, Mobile: 5019332, 5106643, 73042214

Mx kNm -0.11 -0.892 0.138 0.921 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

My kNm 1.084 0.886 -1.112 -0.914 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Mx kNm -0.061 2.102 0.07 -2.093 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

My kNm -3.036 -2.102 3.027 2.093 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

The First criteria check list ( Reactions) for 9M and 6M Types

MTE Engineering Co.,Ltd.

Fax: 513598, Mobile: 5019332, 5106643, 73042214

1.5 CODES AND REFERENCES

See Detail technical data sheets of each tower.

At top and bot.

At top and bot.

MTE Engineering Co.,Ltd.

Fax: 513598, Mobile: 5019332, 5106643, 73042214

Reaction of RT Pole 9m (V200) Node 1

Mx kNm -0.11 -0.892 0.138 0.921 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Moment My kNm 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Moment My kNm 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Mz kNm 1.084 0.886 -1.112 -0.914 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Node 1 o 9M 1.5m Node 5 Node 6

MTE Engineering Co.,Ltd.

Fax: 513598, Mobile: 5019332, 5106643, 73042214

Node 1 N 6M 1.5m Node 5 Node 4