Wendy Choi Mr. Cook IB Biology (Period 3) 3 Oct
Wendy Choi Mr. Cook IB Biology (Period 3) 3 Oct
Wendy Choi Mr. Cook IB Biology (Period 3) 3 Oct
Wendy Choi
Mr. Cook
IB Biology (Period 3)
3 Oct 2008
2. What did the researcher do to try to prove the hypothesis? What conclusions did the
researcher reach?
This group of researchers based their research on a routine survey of contaminants in fishes
from Yukon lakes in 1991, which reveals that the lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush) and the
burbot (Lota lota) from Lake Laberge were contaminated with toxaphene and other lipophilic
contaminants much higher than same species from other subarctic and arctic lakes and rivers.
Despite Canada and the United States’ discontinued use of toxaphene as a piscicide and
pesticide in the early 1980s, it is still used by Eurasians and Central Americans with long-
range atmospheric transport to subarctic and arctic regions, thus causing an elevated
concentration of toxaphene in upper-trophic-level biota from the Arctic, far away from its
original source.
To prove their point after their basic background research, they drew large-volume water
samples from six lakes on the Yukon River system and sup 210 Pb-dated sediment core slices
from Laberge, Fox, and Kusawa lakes were used as back-up measures for toxaphene inputs
from atmospheric or point sources. “The total toxaphene concentration in Laberge water (23
pg liter sup -1 ) was within the range found for five other lakes in southern Yukon [12 to 27
pg liter sup -1 (20)]. Surface and maximum fluxes of toxaphene in the sediment cores were
Choi 2
comparable in all three lakes, similar to those found in other arctic cores and orders of
magnitude lower than values found in temperate lakes previously treated with toxaphene
(Table 1) (21). We thus dismissed the hypothesis that Laberge received elevated inputs of
toxaphene from point sources,” concluding that high concentrations of toxaphene in fishes
from Laberge resulted entirely from the biomagnification of atmospheric inputs. The stable
nitrogen isotope ratios (delta sup 15N) were thus calculated with the equation: delta sup 15 N
= [( sup 15 N/ sup 14 N sub sample / sup 15 N/ sup 14 N sub atmos. nitrogen ) - 1] X 1000,
which provides for an index of trophic level for freshwater organisms.
3. Make some personal observations. Were there flaws in any part of the design or conclusions?
In this experiment, which is largely based on the accuracy of water samples collected as well
as the amount of sup 210 Pb-dated sediment core slices added. For the fact that the
researchers did not specify the method of collecting the water or details in the instruments to
be used in measuring the amount of each reactor in the experiment, one cannot identify
possible flaws throughout the process. However, human mistakes are inevitable; thus, there
are no specification on how many times each trial is repeated or how many people have been
at the site to observe the sample as it first reacted. Generally speaking though, this
experiment is well designed and aims to observe the few lakes that it has under suspicion and
does— at the end— finds a definite cause to the high concentrations of toxaphene in fishes
from subarctic Lake Laberge in Canada's Yukon Territory, which resulted entirely from the
biomagnifications of atmospheric inputs. Despite its success, I personally do not agree that
the word “entirely” should be used because there is always room for improvement and there
may be other not-yet-identified causes of high toxaphene concentrations in the Laberge.