Trial Pit
Trial Pit
Trial Pit
Project
TP9
Sheet
08134
Contractor
27-03-08 1 of 1
Legend
STRATA
Depth 0.00-0.40 0.40-1.20 No DESCRIPTION TOPSOIL: Brown silty clay with occasional gravel & frequent rootlets. Firm brown silty CLAY.
1.20-2.00
1.00 ...stiff. (Medium dense) yellowish brown very slightly clayey sandy sub-rounded GRAVEL.
1.00
VANE
100
Shoring/Support: None. Stability: Stable. Groundwater: Moderate groundwater seepage encountered @ 1.90m.
1.80 A D C All dimensions in metres Scale 1:50 Client: Barratt Homes Method/ Plant Used B 0.70
GENERAL REMARKS
1. Density of granular deposits estimated from visual assessment only. 2. Trial pit terminated due to maximum reach/ difficult excavation with mini digger.
Logged By
TN
Test No. TP1 Trial Pit Dimensions Length (m): Width (m): Depth (m): Start Water Level (m): Total Depth of Test Field Results Time (minutes) 0 1 2 3 4 5 66 117 239
Water Level (mBGL) 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.91 0.89 0.84
effective storage volume of water in the trial pit between 75% and 25% effective depth 1.90 x 0.89775 m3 internal surface area of the trial pit up to 50% effective depth and including the base area 0.95 + 4.84 m2 2.57 + 1.33 0.70 x 0.68
= = ap50 =
= =
tp75-25
time for the water level to fall from 75% to 25% effective depth 25% effective depth = 1.2875 75% effective depth = 1.9625 0 mins 0 secs (Vp75-25) / (ap50 x tp75-25) 0.89775 #DIV/0! / m/s 4.84 x 0 mins
1.00
1.40
1.60
1.80
2.00
2.20
Test No. TP5 Trial Pit Dimensions Length (m): Width (m): Depth (m): Start Water Level (m): Total Depth of Test Field Results Time (minutes) 0 1 2 3 4 5 33 84 153 214 257 327
Water Level (mBGL) 0.88 0.89 0.90 0.91 0.91 0.92 1.02 1.16 1.30 1.40 1.46 1.58
effective storage volume of water in the trial pit between 75% and 25% effective depth 1.90 x 0.9443 m3 internal surface area of the trial pit up to 50% effective depth and including the base area 0.99 + 5.022 m2 2.70 + 1.33 0.70 x 0.71
= = ap50 =
= =
tp75-25
time for the water level to fall from 75% to 25% effective depth 25% effective depth = 1.235 75% effective depth = 1.945 550 130 mins
420 mins 25200 secs (Vp75-25) / (ap50 x tp75-25) 0.9443 / 5.02 x 25200
7.46E-06 m/s
1.00
1.40
1.60
1.80
2.00
2.20
Test No. TP9 Repeat Trial Pit Dimensions Length (m): Width (m): Depth (m): Start Water Level (m): Total Depth of Test Field Results Time (minutes) 0 1 2 3 4 5 16 54 65 122 148
Water Level (mBGL) 1.04 1.09 1.12 1.14 1.16 1.17 1.30 1.56 1.60 1.74 1.80
effective storage volume of water in the trial pit between 75% and 25% effective depth 1.80 x 0.6048 m3 internal surface area of the trial pit up to 50% effective depth and including the base area 0.67 + 3.66 m2 1.73 + 1.26 0.70 x 0.48
= = ap50 =
= =
tp75-25
time for the water level to fall from 75% to 25% effective depth 25% effective depth = 1.28 75% effective depth = 1.76 131 14 mins
117 mins 7020 secs (Vp75-25) / (ap50 x tp75-25) 0.6048 / 3.66 x 7020
2.35E-05 m/s
1.20
1.40
1.60
1.80
2.00
Test No. TP9 Trial Pit Dimensions Length (m): Width (m): Depth (m): Start Water Level (m): Total Depth of Test Field Results Time (minutes) 0 1 2 3 4 5 35 55 87 124 161
Water Level (mBGL) 0.99 1.06 1.12 1.16 1.20 1.22 1.52 1.62 1.71 1.76 1.79
effective storage volume of water in the trial pit between 75% and 25% effective depth 1.80 x 0.6363 m3 internal surface area of the trial pit up to 50% effective depth and including the base area 0.71 + 3.785 m2 1.82 + 1.26 0.70 x 0.51
= = ap50 =
= =
tp75-25
time for the water level to fall from 75% to 25% effective depth 25% effective depth = 1.2425 75% effective depth = 1.7475 108 7.5 mins
100.5 mins 6030 secs (Vp75-25) / (ap50 x tp75-25) 0.6363 / 3.79 x 6030
2.79E-05 m/s
1.05
1.25
1.45
1.65
1.85
UK DCP V3.1
Chainage (km): Direction: Location/Offset: Cone Angle: Zero Error (mm): Test Date:
Surface Type: Thickness (mm): Base Type: Thickness (mm): Surface Moisture: Moisture adjustment factor:
Unpaved 0
CBR Chart
SN
SNC
SNP
----
----
----
Pavement Strength
Layer Surface Base Sub-Base Subgrade Pavement Strength SN Layer Contribution SNC SNP ----------0.00 0.00 -0.00 0.00
CBR Relationship:
TRL equation: log10(CBR) = 2.48 - 1.057 x log10(Strength)
Page 1 of 1
UK DCP V3.1
Chainage (km): Direction: Location/Offset: Cone Angle: Zero Error (mm): Test Date:
Surface Type: Thickness (mm): Base Type: Thickness (mm): Surface Moisture: Moisture adjustment factor:
Unpaved 0
CBR Chart
Strength Coefficient --
SN
SNC
SNP
--
--
--
Pavement Strength
Layer Surface Base Sub-Base Subgrade Pavement Strength SN Layer Contribution SNC SNP ----------0.53 0.53 -0.53 0.53
CBR Relationship:
TRL equation: log10(CBR) = 2.48 - 1.057 x log10(Strength)
Page 1 of 1
UK DCP V3.1
Chainage (km): Direction: Location/Offset: Cone Angle: Zero Error (mm): Test Date:
Surface Type: Thickness (mm): Base Type: Thickness (mm): Surface Moisture: Moisture adjustment factor:
Unpaved 0
CBR Chart
SN
SNC
SNP
----
----
----
Pavement Strength
Layer Surface Base Sub-Base Subgrade Pavement Strength SN Layer Contribution SNC SNP ----------0.00 0.00 -0.00 0.00
CBR Relationship:
TRL equation: log10(CBR) = 2.48 - 1.057 x log10(Strength)
Page 1 of 1
UK DCP V3.1
Chainage (km): Direction: Location/Offset: Cone Angle: Zero Error (mm): Test Date:
Surface Type: Thickness (mm): Base Type: Thickness (mm): Surface Moisture: Moisture adjustment factor:
Unpaved 0
CBR Chart
SN
SNC
SNP
---
---
---
Pavement Strength
Layer Surface Base Sub-Base Subgrade Pavement Strength SN Layer Contribution SNC SNP ----------0.00 0.00 -0.00 0.00
CBR Relationship:
TRL equation: log10(CBR) = 2.48 - 1.057 x log10(Strength)
Page 1 of 1
APPENDIX B PHOTOGRAPHS
PLATE 6 The southeast of the site, viewed from the northeast (note waterlogged topsoil in the foreground).
PLATE 7 Ground conditions encountered in TP2, typical of the ground conditions encountered in the north of the site.
PLATE 8 Ground conditions encountered in TP5, typical of the ground conditions encountered in the south of the site.