Article
Article
Article
S
D
M
e
a
n
S
D
p
-
v
a
l
u
e
M
e
a
n
S
D
p
-
v
a
l
u
e
M
e
a
n
S
D
p
-
v
a
l
u
e
M
e
a
n
S
D
p
-
v
a
l
u
e
H
b
(
g
/
d
L
)
1
0
.
8
6
2
.
1
1
0
.
9
6
1
.
6
0
.
7
9
0
1
1
.
0
6
1
.
4
0
.
6
1
1
1
1
.
3
6
1
.
8
0
.
3
5
8
1
1
.
8
6
1
.
5
0
.
1
1
8
W
B
C
(
1
0
0
0
/
u
L
)
9
.
6
6
4
.
8
8
.
5
6
2
.
5
0
.
7
3
4
9
.
7
6
4
.
2
0
.
9
4
4
8
.
9
6
3
.
4
0
.
6
7
9
8
.
4
6
3
.
5
0
.
3
9
0
P
l
a
t
e
l
e
t
(
1
0
0
0
0
/
u
L
)
4
5
.
6
6
2
0
.
2
3
6
.
4
6
1
5
.
1
0
.
2
0
8
4
4
.
6
6
1
7
.
0
0
.
9
0
1
4
1
.
4
6
1
4
.
8
0
.
5
4
9
3
4
.
7
6
9
.
4
0
.
1
2
0
H
D
L
-
C
(
m
g
/
d
l
)
4
7
.
0
6
1
3
.
1
4
9
.
5
6
1
2
.
8
0
.
7
3
0
4
7
.
2
6
1
0
.
6
0
.
7
1
9
4
0
.
9
6
9
.
5
0
.
2
7
5
4
3
.
1
6
6
.
7
0
.
4
5
2
L
D
L
-
C
(
m
g
/
d
l
)
8
8
.
9
6
3
4
.
4
7
5
.
4
6
2
0
.
1
0
.
3
5
0
7
7
.
2
6
1
6
.
4
0
.
2
1
5
8
0
.
6
6
1
8
.
3
0
.
5
0
8
8
2
.
2
6
2
9
.
1
0
.
5
2
3
T
C
(
m
g
/
d
l
)
1
5
3
.
7
6
3
5
.
5
1
3
7
.
4
6
1
9
.
4
0
.
1
9
2
1
3
7
.
6
6
1
4
.
9
0
.
2
2
6
1
4
2
.
2
6
2
4
.
1
0
.
3
9
9
1
5
0
.
5
6
3
4
.
7
0
.
7
7
2
T
G
(
m
g
/
d
l
)
8
8
.
7
6
2
5
.
0
1
0
4
.
4
6
6
7
.
9
0
.
5
9
8
8
8
.
3
6
2
9
.
9
0
.
9
4
8
1
0
3
.
5
6
5
0
.
6
0
.
2
4
4
1
2
5
.
6
6
8
2
.
8
0
.
1
4
9
C
R
P
(
m
g
/
l
)
3
2
.
5
6
3
3
.
9
2
6
.
3
6
2
9
.
6
0
.
4
8
3
4
7
.
3
6
6
0
.
5
0
.
4
6
6
2
6
.
1
6
2
4
.
2
0
.
2
9
8
1
9
.
7
6
2
8
.
4
0
.
0
9
7
T
h
e
p
v
a
l
u
e
s
w
e
r
e
t
e
s
t
e
d
b
y
p
a
i
r
e
d
-
s
a
m
p
l
e
t
t
e
s
t
a
n
d
n
o
n
p
a
r
a
m
e
t
r
i
c
t
e
s
t
.
A
l
l
t
h
e
p
v
a
l
u
e
s
w
e
r
e
t
e
s
t
e
d
w
i
t
h
v
a
l
u
e
s
f
r
o
m
b
e
f
o
r
e
e
t
a
n
e
r
c
e
p
t
t
r
e
a
t
m
e
n
t
;
C
R
P
=
C
-
r
e
a
c
t
i
v
e
p
r
o
t
e
i
n
;
H
D
L
-
C
=
h
i
g
h
-
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
l
i
p
o
p
r
o
t
e
i
n
c
h
o
l
e
s
t
e
r
o
l
;
L
D
L
-
C
=
l
o
w
-
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
l
i
p
o
p
r
o
t
e
i
n
c
h
o
l
e
s
t
e
r
o
l
;
T
C
=
t
o
t
a
l
c
h
o
l
e
s
t
e
r
o
l
;
T
G
=
t
r
i
g
l
y
c
e
r
i
d
e
s
.
d
o
i
:
1
0
.
1
3
7
1
/
j
o
u
r
n
a
l
.
p
o
n
e
.
0
0
9
0
7
5
7
.
t
0
0
3
T
a
b
l
e
2
.
L
i
p
i
d
p
r
o
f
i
l
e
a
n
d
b
l
o
o
d
d
y
n
a
m
i
c
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
i
n
r
e
s
p
o
n
d
e
r
s
.
R
e
s
p
o
n
d
e
r
s
B
e
f
o
r
e
E
t
a
n
e
r
c
e
p
t
t
r
e
a
t
m
e
n
t
2
M
a
f
t
e
r
E
t
a
n
e
r
c
e
p
t
t
r
e
a
t
m
e
n
t
4
M
a
f
t
e
r
E
t
a
n
e
r
c
e
p
t
t
r
e
a
t
m
e
n
t
6
M
a
f
t
e
r
E
t
a
n
e
r
c
e
p
t
t
r
e
a
t
m
e
n
t
1
2
M
a
f
t
e
r
E
t
a
n
e
r
c
e
p
t
t
r
e
a
t
m
e
n
t
M
e
a
n
S
D
M
e
a
n
S
D
p
-
v
a
l
u
e
M
e
a
n
S
D
p
-
v
a
l
u
e
M
e
a
n
S
D
p
-
v
a
l
u
e
M
e
a
n
S
D
p
-
v
a
l
u
e
H
b
(
g
/
d
L
)
1
1
.
5
6
1
.
5
1
1
.
7
6
1
.
1
0
.
2
9
7
1
2
.
1
6
0
.
9
0
.
0
1
7
*
1
2
.
4
6
0
.
9
0
.
0
0
9
*
1
2
.
8
6
0
.
7
0
.
0
0
2
*
W
B
C
(
1
0
0
0
/
u
L
)
1
2
.
4
6
4
.
9
1
0
.
8
6
5
.
6
0
.
1
4
3
9
.
3
6
2
.
8
0
.
0
4
9
*
9
.
8
6
3
.
8
0
.
0
0
7
*
8
.
8
6
2
.
7
0
.
0
2
4
*
P
l
a
t
e
l
e
t
(
1
0
0
0
0
/
u
L
)
4
3
.
0
6
1
2
.
1
3
8
.
5
6
1
4
.
1
0
.
3
3
3
3
3
.
9
6
6
.
5
0
.
0
1
5
*
3
5
.
5
6
9
.
5
0
.
0
0
9
*
3
2
.
2
6
6
.
0
0
.
0
0
9
*
H
D
L
-
C
(
m
g
/
d
l
)
5
6
.
9
6
1
1
.
3
6
0
.
9
6
1
2
.
1
0
.
4
7
4
6
6
.
5
6
1
2
.
2
0
.
1
3
4
6
2
.
1
6
1
0
.
3
0
.
2
3
6
6
1
.
6
6
1
2
.
1
0
.
4
1
6
L
D
L
-
C
(
m
g
/
d
l
)
9
8
.
6
6
2
4
.
4
9
4
.
0
6
2
3
.
1
0
.
5
7
3
9
8
.
9
6
3
1
.
8
0
.
5
3
1
9
2
.
2
6
2
3
.
9
0
.
9
8
0
1
0
3
6
3
4
.
6
0
.
7
0
3
T
C
(
m
g
/
d
l
)
1
6
4
.
6
6
2
9
.
4
1
6
4
.
1
6
2
6
.
1
0
.
7
2
7
1
7
1
.
2
6
5
1
.
4
0
.
3
6
0
1
6
8
.
3
6
2
6
.
0
0
.
3
0
4
1
7
8
6
4
4
.
2
0
.
2
6
0
T
G
(
m
g
/
d
l
)
6
8
.
6
6
2
2
.
4
6
5
.
4
6
2
5
.
2
0
.
4
9
0
9
3
.
7
6
4
3
.
1
0
.
1
2
6
7
0
.
7
6
2
2
.
2
0
.
8
1
0
7
8
.
6
6
3
2
.
9
0
.
1
6
5
C
R
P
(
m
g
/
l
)
4
4
.
9
6
4
4
.
5
1
7
.
6
6
2
6
.
4
0
.
0
9
1
3
.
4
6
2
.
7
0
.
0
1
9
*
7
.
8
6
9
.
5
0
.
0
3
4
*
5
.
1
6
8
.
0
0
.
0
2
7
*
T
h
e
p
v
a
l
u
e
s
w
e
r
e
t
e
s
t
e
d
b
y
p
a
i
r
e
d
-
s
a
m
p
l
e
t
t
e
s
t
a
n
d
n
o
n
p
a
r
a
m
e
t
r
i
c
t
e
s
t
.
A
l
l
t
h
e
p
v
a
l
u
e
s
w
e
r
e
t
e
s
t
e
d
w
i
t
h
v
a
l
u
e
s
f
r
o
m
b
e
f
o
r
e
e
t
a
n
e
r
c
e
p
t
t
r
e
a
t
m
e
n
t
;
*
p
,
0
.
0
5
,
s
t
a
t
i
s
t
i
c
a
l
l
y
s
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
.
C
R
P
=
C
-
r
e
a
c
t
i
v
e
p
r
o
t
e
i
n
;
H
D
L
-
C
=
h
i
g
h
-
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
l
i
p
o
p
r
o
t
e
i
n
c
h
o
l
e
s
t
e
r
o
l
;
L
D
L
-
C
=
l
o
w
-
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
l
i
p
o
p
r
o
t
e
i
n
c
h
o
l
e
s
t
e
r
o
l
;
T
C
=
t
o
t
a
l
c
h
o
l
e
s
t
e
r
o
l
;
T
G
=
t
r
i
g
l
y
c
e
r
i
d
e
s
.
d
o
i
:
1
0
.
1
3
7
1
/
j
o
u
r
n
a
l
.
p
o
n
e
.
0
0
9
0
7
5
7
.
t
0
0
2
Lipid Profiles in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis
PLOS ONE | www.plosone.org 4 March 2014 | Volume 9 | Issue 3 | e90757
to responders of JIA patients. We observed a close relationship
between JIA disease activity and lipid levels consistent with
previous findings. We found that the higher inflammatory state in
JIA patients is associated with the risk of dyslipidemia. However,
unlike adults, children and adolescents have fewer chronic diseases
and traditional cardiovascular risk factors, so this JIA cohort
presents with a baseline to further investigate the role of chronic
inflammatory arthritis in the pathogenesis of dyslipidemia and the
hemodynamic change after etanercept treatment.
Although the relationship between dyslipidemia and inflamma-
tory conditions of rheumatoid arthritis in adults has been
mentioned in many studies, results remain still controver-
sial[1,11,21]. Moreover, only a few published studies specifically
discuss this subject with regards to JIA patients, and several have
Figure 1. The change of inflammation marker and lipid profiles of JIA patients after etanercept treatment. (A) CRP (B) TG level
significantly decreased after etanercept treatment in the inactive patients than active patient.(C) HDL-C (D) LDL-C (E) T-Chol, and (F) T-Chol/HDL-C
ratio significantly increased after etanercept treatment in the inactive patients than active patient. CRP=C-reactive protein; TG=triglycerides; HDL-
C=high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C=low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; T-Chol =total cholesterol
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0090757.g001
Lipid Profiles in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis
PLOS ONE | www.plosone.org 5 March 2014 | Volume 9 | Issue 3 | e90757
had inconsistent results. Ilowite et al were the first to describe an
altered lipoprotein profile in JIA patients that was characterized by
decreased HDL levels and increased TG and VLDL levels[15].
Dyslipidemia with decreased HDL-C levels and elevated levels of
low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, and total choles-
terol were identified with polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis
by Marangoni et al [22]: however, they presented that
dyslipidemia with decreased HDL-C was not affected by disease
activity or therapy. Another two studies showed an insignificant
diminution of LDL-C in patients with active disease when
compared to either patients without active disease or to controls
[23,24]. However, the results could be biased due to factors that
were not the controlled and the lack of longitudinal study design.
Disease severity was also different and it is an important issue that
influences lipid profile level. In two other studies published by
Bakkaloglu et al [23] and Tselepis et al [25], similar pro-
atherogenic patterns of serum lipids closely related to disease
activity in JIA patients have already been described. Interestingly,
these abnormalities were compatible to our findings. In our study,
when comparing responders and non-responders, higher HDL-C,
TC and lower TG and TC/HDL-C ratio were found in
responders. A study by Vermont et al showed reduced cholesterol
level in children upon admission with severe meningococcal sepsis
and were completely normal 123 months after admission were
prescribed [26]. And they also found that TC, HDL-C, and LDL-
C levels on admission are inversely associated with disease severity.
Our finding also showed that TC, HDL-C, and LDL-C were
higher in responders than in non-responders after etanercept
treatment. Therefore, we suggest that disease severity was
associated with atherogenic index (TC/HDL-C ratio) and
inversely associated with TC, HDL-C, and LDL-C levels.
To date, several studies have examined the mechanisms of why
there is a correlation between inflammation and lipid profiles in JIA
patients, but a definitive understanding of this correlation has not
yet been established. Cytokine induced activation of the reticulo-
endothelial system is hypothesis by Shen C-C, et al [27]. A
significant correlation is noted between clinical variables of disease
severity with levels of interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-a. As
reported in adults with chronic arthritis, treatment with biologics
targeting tumor necrosis factor-a receptor decreased all parameters
of inflammation and increase HDL-C and TC levels significantly
[21,28]. In non-responders group, the majority were systemic type
JIA which seems to be less effective when treating with TNF alpha
antagonist than other categories. With understanding on disease
pathogenesis, biologics blocking IL-1 and IL-6 played more effective
treatment role on systemic type JIA. This is one of the explanations
that lipid profiles would not respond dominantly either in our study.
Other biologic agents have also been shown to affect lipid profiles.
Tocilizumab (TCZ), which inhibits the proinflammatory cytokine
IL-6 binding to its receptors, is associated with decreases in
inflammatory markers [29]. In the present study, we also find
significantly higher HDL-C and lower TG and TC/HDL-C in
responders (Table 5). Therefore, based on the present study, we
hypothesize that lipid abnormalities correlate with disease activity
which could be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular
mortality and morbidity in active JIA, however, this could be
improved after adequate anti-inflammatory intervention.
Table 4. GEE analysis in responders versus non-responders
during treatment (no adjust cofactor).
Outcome Levels B Lower Upper p-value
Hb(g/dL) R 0.9172 0.0096 1.8248 0.0476*
N 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
WBC(1000/uL) R 1.2502 21.2640 3.7644 0.3298
N 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Platelet(10000/uL) R 239.7577 2119.0546 39.5391 0.3258
N 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
HDL-C(mg/dl) R 16.0381 9.3458 22.7305 ,0.0001*
N 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
LDL-C(mg/dl) R 16.0991 21.5544 33.7526 0.0739
N 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
TC/HDL-C ratio R 20.5816 21.0518 20.1114 0.0153*
N 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
LDL-L/HDL-C ratio R 20.2443 20.6507 0.1622 0.2388
N 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
TC(mg/dl) R 24.5882 3.7782 45.3981 0.0206*
N 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
TG(mg/dl) R 226.6028 252.9315 20.2741 0.0477*
N 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
CRP(mg/l) R 213.9204 231.8040 3.9633 0.1271
N 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
*p,0.05, statistically significant.
R: responders; N: non- responders; CRP =C-reactive protein; HDL-C=high-
density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C=low-density lipoprotein cholesterol;
TC=total cholesterol; TG=triglycerides.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0090757.t004
Table 5. GEE analysis in responders versus non-responders
during treatment (adjusted for age, gender and time
cofactors).
Outcome Levels B Lower Upper p-value
Hb(g/dL) R 0.6181 20.1460 1.3823 0.1129
N 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
WBC(1000/uL) R 1.3234 21.2023 3.8490 0.3044
N 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Platelet(10000/uL) R 227.0561 2100.6331 46.5210 0.4711
N 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
HDL-C(mg/dl) R 16.6861 10.2569 23.1154 ,0.0001*
N 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
LDL-C(mg/dl) R 16.0705 0.3824 31.7586 0.0447*
N 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
TC/HDL-C ratio R 20.5967 21.0079 20.1854 0.0045*
N 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
LDL-C/HDL-C ratio R 20.2684 20.6314 0.0947 0.1474
N 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
TC(mg/dl) R 26.5485 7.0154 46.0816 0.0077*
N 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
TG(mg/dl) R 226.2666 252.2437 20.2895 0.0475*
N 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
CRP(mg/l) R 213.8714 232.1664 4.4235 0.1373
N 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
*p,0.05, statistically significant.
R: responders; N:non- responders; CRP =C-reactive protein; HDL-C =high-
density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C=low-density lipoprotein cholesterol;
TC=total cholesterol; TG=triglycerides.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0090757.t005
Lipid Profiles in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis
PLOS ONE | www.plosone.org 6 March 2014 | Volume 9 | Issue 3 | e90757
A number of limitations with regards to this study should be
considered. Firstly, the relatively small sample size in this study
may raise some questions about the statistical power of these
findings. Secondly, all baseline variables were considered as
potential confounders; however, we were not able to exclude
confounding by unmeasured factors - for example, smoking,
exercise, steroid or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and
so on. Thirdly, because of the longitudinal cohort design of the
study, missing data may have led to bias. Therefore, we attempted
to use GEE analysis, as it adjusts for dependency of several
measurements within one subject and is capable of dealing with
unequally spaced time intervals and with missing data [30].
Finally, atherosclerosis is a chronic and multifactorial process in
which long-term changes in the lipid profile will affect CV risk
[31]. We considered that JIA is a chronic inflammation disease
which can cause hyperlipidemia. We only followed up our patients
for 1 year, whereas a longer period of time may be required to
address long-term outcomeIn the present study, all patients were
at an active stage in their disease in the beginning and traditional
treatment had already failed. In other words, they had severe,
persistent JIA and no effective traditional treatment was available,
as reflected by the long duration of disease, large number of active
joints and higher level of inflammatory status. Half of the patients
(12/23) had good response to etanercept after 12 months of
treatment. The results suggest that etanercept provided a good
response to some JIA patients, but the remaining JIA patients still
needed to use other treatments to control disease activity.
In conclusion, we have found that active JIA was associated with
pro-atherogenic patterns of serum lipid profiles. Disease severity
was associated with atherogenic index (TC/HDL-C ratio) and
inversely associated with TC, HDL-C, and LDL-C levels. By using
TNF- a receptor blocking agent(anti-inflammatory drug), the
aberrant lipid profiles were improved by of the control of
inflammation status, which may in turn reduce the risk of CVD
in non-systemic type JIA. Additional prospective long- term study
is needed to comprehensively investigate the role of inflammation
and the impact of biologic agents on lipid levels and CV outcomes
in patients with JIA.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: JLH. Analyzed the data: CJC
YJL. Wrote the paper: CML KWY.
References
1. Kaplan MJ (2009) Management of cardiovascular disease risk in chronic
inflammatory disorders. Nat Rev Rheumatol 5: 2082217.
2. Hokanson JE, Austin MA (1996) Plasma triglyceride level is a risk factor for
cardiovascular disease independent of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level:
a meta-analysis of population-based prospective studies. J Cardiovasc Risk 3:
2132219.
3. Ballantyne CM, Grundy SM, Oberman A, Kreisberg RA, Havel RJ, et al. (2000)
Hyperlipidemia: diagnostic and therapeutic perspectives. J Clin Endocrinol
Metab 85: 208922112.
4. Naranjo A, Sokka T, Descalzo MA, Calvo-Alen J, Hrslev-Petersen K, et al.
(2008) Cardiovascular disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from
the QUEST-RA study. Arthritis Res Ther 10: R30.
5. Petty RE, Southwood TR, Baum J, Bhettay E, Glass DN, et al. (1998) Revision
of the proposed classification criteria for juvenile idiopathic arthritis: Durban,
1997. J Rheumatol 25: 199121994.
6. Prakken B, Albani S, Martini A (2011) Juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Lancet 377:
213822149.
7. Huang JL (2012) New Advances in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. Chang Gung
Med J 35: 1214.
8. Woo P (1998) Cytokines in juvenile chronic arthritis. Baillieres Clin Rheumatol
12: 2192228.
9. Beukelman T, Patkar NM, Saag KG, Tolleson-Rinehart S, Cron RQ, et al.
(2011) 2011 American College of Rheumatology recommendations for the
treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: initiation and safety monitoring of
therapeutic agents for the treatment of arthritis and systemic features. Arthritis
Care Res (Hoboken) 63: 4652482.
10. Garrison L, McDonnell ND (1999) Etanercept: therapeutic use in patients with
rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 58 Suppl 1: I652169.
11. Deleuran BW, Chu CQ, Field M, Brennan FM, Mitchell T, et al. (1992)
Localization of tumor necrosis factor receptors in the synovial tissue and
cartilage-pannus junction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Implications for
local actions of tumor necrosis factor alpha. Arthritis Rheum 35: 117021178.
12. Otten MH, Prince FH, Armbrust W, ten Cate R, Hoppenreijs EP, et al. (2011)
Factors associated with treatment response to etanercept in juvenile idiopathic
arthritis. JAMA 306: 234022347.
13. Horneff G, De Bock F, Foeldvari I, Girschick HJ, Michels H, et al. (2009) Safety
and efficacy of combination of etanercept and methotrexate compared to
treatment with etanercept only in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA):
preliminary data from the German JIA Registry. Ann Rheum Dis 68: 5192525.
14. Popa C, van den Hoogen FH, Radstake TR, Netea MG, Eijsbouts AE, et al.
(2007) Modulation of lipoprotein plasma concentrations during long-term anti-
TNF therapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 66:
150321507.
15. Ilowite NT, Samuel P, Beseler L, Jacobson MS (1989) Dyslipoproteinemia in
juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. J Pediatr 114: 8232826.
16. Petty RE, Southwood TR, Manners P, Baum J, Glass DN, et al. (2004)
International League of Associations for Rheumatology classification of juvenile
idiopathic arthritis: second revision, Edmonton, 2001. J Rheumatol 31:
3902392.
17. Wallace CA, Ruperto N, Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research
Alliance, Pediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization, Pediatric
Rheumatology Collaborative Study Group, et al. (2004) Preliminary criteria for
clinical remission for select categories of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. J Rheumatol
31: 229022294.
18. Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS (1972) Estimation of the
concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of
the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem 18: 4992502.
19. Millan J, Pinto X, Mun oz A, Zuniga M, Rubies-Prat J, et al. (2009) Lipoprotein
ratios: Physiological significance and clinical usefulness in cardiovascular
prevention. Vasc Health Risk Manag 5: 7572765.
20. Rodr guez-Moran M, Guerrero-Romero F, Aradillas-Garc a C, Bermudez-Pen a
C, Simental-Mendia LE, et al. (2013) Atherogenic indices and prehypertension
in obese and non-obese children. Diab Vasc Dis Res 10: 17224.
21. Jamnitski A, Visman IM, Peters MJ, Dijkmans BA, Voskuyl AE, et al. (2010)
Beneficial effect of 1-year etanercept treatment on the lipid profile in responding
patients with rheumatoid arthritis: the ETRA study. Ann Rheum Dis 69:
192921933.
22. Marangoni RG, Hayata AL, Borba EF, Azevedo PM, Bonfa E, et al. (2011)
Decreased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in polyarticular juvenile
idiopathic arthritis. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 66: 154921552.
23. Bakkaloglu A, Kirel B, Ozen S, Saatci U, Topaloglu, et al. (1996) Plasma lipids
and lipoproteins in juvenile chronic arthritis. Clin Rheumatol 15: 3412345.
24. Goncalves M, DAlmeida V, Guerra-Shinohara EM, Galdieri LC, Len CA, et
al. (2007) Homocysteine and lipid profile in children with Juvenile Idiopathic
Arthritis. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J 5: 2.
25. Tselepis AD, Elisaf M, Besis S, Karabina SA, Chapman MJ, et al. (1999)
Association of the inflammatory state in active juvenile rheumatoid arthritis with
hypo-high-density lipoproteinemia and reduced lipoprotein-associated platelet-
activating factor acetylhydrolase activity. Arthritis Rheum 42: 3732383.
26. Vermont CL, den Brinker M, Kakeci N, de Kleijn ED, de Rijke YB, et al. (2005)
Serum lipids and disease severity in children with severe meningococcal sepsis.
Crit Care Med 33: 161021615.
27. Shen CC, Yao TC, Yeh KW, Huang JL (2013) Association of disease activity
and anti-rheumatic treatment in juvenile idiopathic arthritis with serum lipid
profiles: A prospective study. Semin Arthritis Rheum 42: 5902596.
28. van Eijk IC, de Vries MK, Levels JH, Peters MJ, Huizer EE, et al. (2009)
Improvement of lipid profile is accompanied by atheroprotective alterations in
high-density lipoprotein composition upon tumor necrosis factor blockade: a
prospective cohort study in ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum 60:
132421330.
29. Popa C, Netea MG, Radstake T, Van der Meer JW, Stalenhoef AF, et al. (2005)
Influence of anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy on cardiovascular risk factors in
patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 64: 3032305.
30. Twisk JW (2004) Longitudinal data analysis. A comparison between generalized
estimating equations and random coefficient analysis. Eur J Epidemiol 19:
7692776.
31. Yusuf S, Hawken S, Ounpuu S, Dans T, Avezum A, et al. (2004) Effect of
potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52
countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study. Lancet
364(9438):9372952.
Lipid Profiles in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis
PLOS ONE | www.plosone.org 7 March 2014 | Volume 9 | Issue 3 | e90757