Martina (2002) - Punching Behavior of Biaxial Hollow Slabs
Martina (2002) - Punching Behavior of Biaxial Hollow Slabs
Martina (2002) - Punching Behavior of Biaxial Hollow Slabs
c
m
2
=
m
A
s
-
d
o
w
n
c
m
2
=
m
f
c
;
1
5
0
N
=
m
m
2
f
c
;
t
N
=
m
m
2
U
l
t
i
m
a
t
e
l
o
a
d
B
u
b
b
l
e
D
e
c
k
(
t
e
s
t
)
(
k
N
)
U
l
t
i
m
a
t
e
l
o
a
d
m
a
s
s
i
v
e
s
l
a
b
(
c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
a
)
(
k
N
)
D
1
-
2
4
2
4
Y
e
s
3
4
.
2
5
1
1
.
3
1
4
4
.
4
2
.
8
5
2
0
8
4
0
D
2
-
2
4
2
4
Y
e
s
3
4
.
2
5
1
1
.
3
1
5
0
.
8
2
.
5
5
8
0
9
4
5
D
3
-
2
4
2
4
Y
e
s
3
4
.
2
5
1
1
.
3
1
4
6
.
7
2
.
9
5
2
5
8
9
3
D
4
-
4
5
4
5
Y
e
s
4
0
.
2
9
1
5
.
7
1
2
9
.
6
2
.
9
9
3
5
1
5
0
3
D
5
-
4
5
4
5
Y
e
s
4
0
.
2
9
1
5
.
7
1
3
7
.
9
2
.
1
9
9
0
1
7
0
1
D
6
-
4
5
4
5
Y
e
s
4
0
.
2
9
1
5
.
7
1
4
0
.
5
3
.
0
1
1
8
0
1
7
9
5
a
A
c
c
o
r
d
i
n
g
t
o
D
I
N
1
0
4
5
.
M. Schnellenbach-Held, K. Pfeer / Cement & Concrete Composites 24 (2002) 551556 553
To generate a nite element mesh of the slab in-
cluding the cavities in form of the balls, four-node, iso-
parametric solid pyramid elements are used. Although
the symmetry of the system has been taken into account,
the computation time is very high. Another mesh with
less elements was not able to reproduce the geometry of
the bubbles in a satisfying manner. The use of smaller
elements and of elements with an advanced order did
not change the results signicantly, but led to an in-
creased computation time. In Fig. 7 the mesh is visual-
ized.
The steel has been added as embedded reinforcement
that assumes a perfect bond between the reinforcement
and the concrete. For the steel a bilinear stressstrain
diagram is used. For the concrete the Total-Strain-
Concept, developed along the lines of the Modied
Compression Field Theory, originally proposed by Vec-
chio and Collins [8,9], is used. For the compressive re-
gime a parabolic stressstrain diagram and for the
tensile regime a softening curve according to Hordijk [6],
is taken into account. Inuences on the compressive
behavior like lateral cracking and lateral connement
are considered additionally.
The diagram in Fig. 8 shows a comparison of the
loaddeection curve of the test and the computation. A
quite good conformance is observed. The diagram in
Fig. 9 gives an impression of the inuence of the mate-
Fig. 7. Finite element mesh (front view and view of the cross-section).
Fig. 5. Crack pattern (top view).
Fig. 6. Crack pattern (cross-section).
Fig. 4. Test setup.
554 M. Schnellenbach-Held, K. Pfeer / Cement & Concrete Composites 24 (2002) 551556
rial properties to the ultimate punching load, by chang-
ing each parameter in dierent computations from 25%
to 200%. As an important point it should be remarked
that the tensile strength and the fracture energy have the
biggest inuence on the ultimate load.
To be sure that the computations lead to realistic
results, besides the comparison of the loaddeection
diagrams, it is important to compare the computed
stresses and strains with the test results as well as to
compare the observed crack pattern. Examples of such
confrontations are given in Figs. 1012. The diagrams
and pictures also conrm a good conformance.
Fig. 8. Loaddeection diagram of a computation and test.
Fig. 9. Inuence of material parameters to the ultimate punching load.
Fig. 12. Comparison of the internal crack pattern in computation and in test.
Fig. 10. Comparison of steel-strains on top of the column in test and
in computation.
Fig. 11. Comparison of concrete-strains in the near of the column in
test and in computation.
M. Schnellenbach-Held, K. Pfeer / Cement & Concrete Composites 24 (2002) 551556 555
4. Design recommendations
In many design codes punching resistance is treated
as a shear resistance that acts at a section, the so-called
control perimeter. This control perimeter does not have
any physical meaning [2]. In fact this empirical approach
gives a close approximation to the resistance obtained
by mechanical models of punching behavior. In the case
of a biaxial hollow slab this design concept can be used
with a simple modication. If any of the bubbles are
situated in between the control perimeter and the border
of the column, it is necessary to reduce the shear area by
the area A of the intersection of the control perimeter
with the bubbles (Eq. (1), Fig. 13).
A uh
m
X
d
2
k
p=4
: 1
If there is no bubble in this area the design rules of a
solid slab for punching can be applied to the biaxial
hollow deck without modication. It should be re-
marked that the bubbles must not intersect the column.
In Table 1 the calculated ultimate load (by using DIN
1045 and by taking Eq. (1) into regard) is compared with
the ultimate load of the tests.
5. Conclusions
The previous investigations showed that the mode of
failure of biaxial hollow slabs is similar to the one of
solid slabs. To specify the punching shear capacity a
proposal of a modication of available design rules has
been made. With the described nonlinear nite element
computations it is possible to make further investiga-
tions of the structural behavior of this slab. Parametric
studies with dierent material properties, dierent di-
mensions, and dierent geometrical proportions will be
performed. In the future investigations on the punching
shear resistance of biaxial hollow slabs with shear rein-
forcement and investigations of slab-edge column con-
nections and slab-corner column connections will be
performed.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful for the nancial support to this in-
vestigations, provided by the BubbleDeck AG, Swit-
zerland.
References
[1] DIN 1045. Beton und Stahlbeton. 1988.
[2] Comitee Euro-international du beeton. CEB-FIP Model Code 1990.
Design Code.
[3] Margoldova J, Cervenka V, Pukl R, Klein D. Angewandte
Spr oodbruchberechnung. Bauingenieur 1999;74(3):229.
[4] Ozbolt J, Mayer U, Vocke H, Eligehausen R. Verschmierte
rimethode theorie und anwendung. Beton und Stahlbetonbau
1999;94(10):40312.
[5] Van Mier JGM. Examples of non-linear analysis of reinforced
concrete structures with DIANA. Heron 1987;32(3).
[6] Hordijk DA. Tensile and tensile fatigue behaviour of concrete,
experiments, modelling and analyses, Delft. Heron 1992;37(1).
[7] Schnellenbach-Held M, Pfeer K. Punching shear capacity of
biaxial hollow slabs. In: International Workshop on Punching
Shear Capacity of RC Slabs, Proceedings. Stockholm: Royal
Institute of Technology; 2000. p. 42330.
[8] Vecchio FJ, Collins MP. The modied compression eld theory
for reinforced concrete elements subjected to shear. ACI J 1986;
83(22):21931.
[9] Selby RG, Vecchio FJ. Three-dimensional constitutive relations for
reinforced concrete. Technical Report 93-02, University of To-
ronto, Department of Civil Engineering, Toronto, Canada, 1993.
Fig. 13. Reduction of the shear area.
556 M. Schnellenbach-Held, K. Pfeer / Cement & Concrete Composites 24 (2002) 551556