This document analyzes the octane synergies between ethanol, MTBE, and TAME when blended into gasoline at various concentrations. The study found that adding ethanol to the gasoline base stock resulted in greater increases in research octane number when ethers were also added compared to gasoline without ethanol. Specifically, blending 3% ethanol increased the research octane number gains of MTBE and TAME by 2-4 points when added at concentrations from 1-10% compared to the base gasoline alone. Additionally, the blending octane values of ethers were higher in a petroleum-derived gasoline base compared to a Fischer-Tropsch synthetic gasoline base, likely due to differences in olefin content between the fuels.
This document analyzes the octane synergies between ethanol, MTBE, and TAME when blended into gasoline at various concentrations. The study found that adding ethanol to the gasoline base stock resulted in greater increases in research octane number when ethers were also added compared to gasoline without ethanol. Specifically, blending 3% ethanol increased the research octane number gains of MTBE and TAME by 2-4 points when added at concentrations from 1-10% compared to the base gasoline alone. Additionally, the blending octane values of ethers were higher in a petroleum-derived gasoline base compared to a Fischer-Tropsch synthetic gasoline base, likely due to differences in olefin content between the fuels.
This document analyzes the octane synergies between ethanol, MTBE, and TAME when blended into gasoline at various concentrations. The study found that adding ethanol to the gasoline base stock resulted in greater increases in research octane number when ethers were also added compared to gasoline without ethanol. Specifically, blending 3% ethanol increased the research octane number gains of MTBE and TAME by 2-4 points when added at concentrations from 1-10% compared to the base gasoline alone. Additionally, the blending octane values of ethers were higher in a petroleum-derived gasoline base compared to a Fischer-Tropsch synthetic gasoline base, likely due to differences in olefin content between the fuels.
This document analyzes the octane synergies between ethanol, MTBE, and TAME when blended into gasoline at various concentrations. The study found that adding ethanol to the gasoline base stock resulted in greater increases in research octane number when ethers were also added compared to gasoline without ethanol. Specifically, blending 3% ethanol increased the research octane number gains of MTBE and TAME by 2-4 points when added at concentrations from 1-10% compared to the base gasoline alone. Additionally, the blending octane values of ethers were higher in a petroleum-derived gasoline base compared to a Fischer-Tropsch synthetic gasoline base, likely due to differences in olefin content between the fuels.
Jacques van Heerden; Petrus N. J. Roets; Johan J. Botha; Heinrich F. Strauss ISAF XV International Symposia on Alcohol Fuels September 26 28, 2005 Overview ~ Background ~ Objectives ~ Methodology ~ Results ~ Conclusions Background - Pressures on refiners ~ Vehicle manufacturers are demanding higher octane unleaded gasoline ~ Use of oxygenates is an alternative to reduce carbon monoxide emissions ~ J anuary 2006 total Pb phase out in SA oxygenates to cater for octane deficit Background - Sasols Experience with Oxygenates ~ Experience with alcohol 8-12 vol % in gasoline 1981-2001 ~ Experience with alcohol below 2 vol % in gasoline since 2000 ~ Experience with TAME since introduction of unleaded gasoline in the South African market in 1996 ~ Have previously shown that there are synergistic effects when blending alcohol and ether in same gasoline blend (ISAF XIV, Thailand, 2002) Physical and Chemical Properties Oxygenate Ethanol MtBE TAME Chemical Formula C 2 H 6 0
Carbon 52.2 68.1 70.5 Hydrogen 13.1 13.7 13.8 Oxygen 34.7 18.2 15.7 Boiling Temperature, C 77-79 54-56 85-87 Research Octane Number 129 116 112 Motor Octane Number 96 101 99 Reid Vapour Pressure, kPa 15.86 53.78 10.34 Flash Point, C 12 -28 -11 Water Solubility (g/100mL) Miscible 10 5.1 <0.1???
Background - Ethers vs. Ethanol ~ Maximum allowable: 15 vol. % vs. 10 vol. % - 3.7 mass% O 2 ~ Traditionally ethers transported in gasoline via pipeline ethanol cannot be handled in multi- product pipelines ~ Ethanol blends are not sent through pipeline systems because they may pick up water and other impurities in transit. ~ Sasol has successfully transported alcohol blended in gasoline via pipeline since 1998 ~ Gasoline RVP: MTBE & TAME very similar to gasoline ethanol increases RVP ~ Refiners must reduce lighter components in summertime to reduce VOCs vs Objectives ~ The objective of this blending study was to verify/quantify the possible octane benefits of using fuel alcohol (EtOH) and the ethers (MTBE and TAME) as co-oxygenates in unleaded gasoline blending. ~ This study comprises the blending octane properties of 95/5 Sasol Fuel Alcohol (SFA) (95% ethanol and 5% propanol) produced by the Sasol Synfuels facility, and TAME and MTBE over a concentration range of 3% and 1 10% respectively. Methodology - Octane Synergies ~ Synthetic and Petroleum derived unleaded gasoline containing 3 volume percentage Sasol Fuel Alcohol (SFA) were used as base fuels ~ Ether (MTBE and TAME) was added, at increasing addition rates by volume, to determine the effect of the oxygenates on the octane numbers (RON and MON) ~ As a reference, gasoline blends with no oxygenates were used and the ethers were added in same ratios as mentioned above ~ Octane ratings of the blends were determined as per ASTM standard test methods ~ The blending octane of the oxygenates was determined using linear equations Results - Blending Research Octane Number 105 110 115 120 125 130 TAME in FT Base MTBE in FT Base TAME in Pet Base MTBE in Pet Base 0 vol% SFA 3 vol% SFA ~The increase of the BRON when SFA is added petroleum based gasoline is significantly higher if compared with FT based gasoline Results - Blending Motor Octane Number 94 96 98 100 102 104 106 108 110 TAME in FT Base MTBE in FT Base TAME in Pet Base MTBE in Pet Base 0 vol% SFA 3 vol% SFA ~The addition of SFA reduce the BMON of both TAME and MTBE for FT base gasoline Results - RON Gain in F-T Base Gasoline 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 1 % MTBE 3% MTBE 6% MTBE 10% MTBE 1% TAME 3% TAME 6%TAME 10% TAME Ether Content w/o SFA With 3-vol% SFA Base RON = 88.5 Results - RON Gain in Petroleum Base Gasoline 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 % MTBE 3% MTBE 6% MTBE 10% MTBE 1% TAME 3% TAME 6%TAME 10% TAME Ether Content w/o SFA With 3-vol% SFA Base RON = 90.8 Results Ave Delta in Blending Research Octane Number 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 TAME in FT Base MTBE in FT Base TAME in Pet Base MTBE in Pet Base Results Ave Delta in Blending Motor Octane Number -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 TAME in FT Base MTBE in FT Base TAME in CO Base MTBE in CO Base Discussion ~ The research octane number gain with the addition of ether in a base gasoline, which contains alcohol, is higher than with a base gasoline that does not contain any alcohol. ~ The blending octane values of the ethers in the crude oil based material are higher than the corresponding values in the Fischer-Tropsch derived material. ~ This may be attributed to differences in olefin content between the two base fuels without alcohol. Conclusions ~ The blending octane ethers compares very well with that of the values given in literature. ~ Even the addition of low concentrations of alcohol to the unleaded base fuel has a significant effect on the octane number of the resulting gasoline-oxygenate blend. ~ The gain in octane with the addition of ether is higher with a base fuel containing alcohol. ~ The composition of the base fuel appear to have significant effect on the blending octane number of the oxygenates, i.e. high olefin content affects lower blending octane of oxygenates and vice versa Questions? Background - Properties of commonly used Oxygenates