Factors Influencing The Effectiveness of Information System Implementation Among Small and Medium Manufacturing Enterprises in Malaysia
Factors Influencing The Effectiveness of Information System Implementation Among Small and Medium Manufacturing Enterprises in Malaysia
Factors Influencing The Effectiveness of Information System Implementation Among Small and Medium Manufacturing Enterprises in Malaysia
6
X
6
+
7
X
7
+
where:
0
= constant; X
1
= participation; X
2
= IS
knowledge; X
3
= accounting knowledge; X
4
= consultants; X
5
= vendors; X
6
= government
agencies; X
7
= accounting frms; X
8
= IS
effectiveness; and = error term.
The regression equation treated IS
effectiveness (X
8
) as the dependent variable and
manager participation in IS implementation (X
1
),
manager IS knowledge (X
2
), manager accounting
knowledge (X
3
), consultants effectiveness
(X
4
), vendors effectiveness (X
5
), government
agencies effectiveness (X
6
), and accounting frms
effectiveness (X
7
) as the independent variables.
The following sections explain the methodology
adopted and the measurement of the research
variables.
RESEARCH METHOD
The focus of this study was on IS effectiveness in
SMEs. This was further restricted to manufacturing
frms because the manufacturing sector can provide
a range of levels of IS sophistication (Cragg, King,
& Hussin, 2002). The Malaysian Small and
Medium Industries Development Corporation
(SMIDEC) defined SMEs in manufacturing,
manufacturing-related services, and agro-based
industries as enterprises with full-time employees
not exceeding 150 or with annual sales turnover
not exceeding RM25 million. However, SMEs in
this study were defned as any unit having between
20 and 150 employees. The number of employees
is the most commonly used international defnition
in the literature, since in some cultures, small frms
are reluctant to disclose precise fnancial details.
Very small frms (with less than 20 employees)
were excluded to increase the probability of
sampling computerised frms.
To achieve this, a mail questionnaire
survey was carried out to gather the data. The
Federation of Malaysian Manufacturers database
provides a total of 771 addresses of SMEs as
defned in this study. Fifty addresses were used
for the pre-test and pilot test, and the remaining
721 were used for the main survey. Following
Dillmans (1978) suggestion, the questionnaire
was refined in three stages: pre-testing with
academics and research students, pre-testing
with frm managers, and pilot testing with frm
managers. The pre-test aimed to clarify the
wording of both the questionnaire instructions
and questions, whilst the pilot test attempted to
examine patterns of respondents answers, and
thus their understanding of the questionnaire.
The questionnaires were addressed to
the manager of the frms. Managers were chosen
to be the respondents of this study because they
were more likely to have valid perceptions of the
IS approach adopted by the frms. This is because
the manager commonly makes most key decisions
and is perhaps the only person who can harness
IS to achieve the frms objectives and strategy.
In addition, the manager is typically the owner of
the frm, and thus it is reasonable to assume the
current manager is the same manager who decides
on the implementation of IS of the frm (Thong,
1999).
h
t
t
p
:
/
/
m
m
j
.
u
u
m
.
e
d
u
.
m
y
27
Malaysian Management Journal 13 (1 & 2), 21-34 (2009)
Measurement of Variables
a. Manager participation
This study adopted a similar instrument used
by Hussin et al. (2002) to measure manager
participation in IS implementation. The instrument
which was originally developed by Jarvenpaa and
Ives (1991) was tested and validated by Hussin
et al. (2002) in the specifc context of SMEs.
Based on bipolar anchors with a fve-point scale
anchored between no participation and high
participation, the respondents were asked to
indicate their level of participation in the following
five areas: definition of needs (information
requirements), selection of hardware and software,
implementation of systems, systems maintenance
and problem solving, and planning for future IS
deployment.
b. Manager IS knowledge
This study measured manager IS knowledge
using a list of seven applications commonly
found in SMEs. The respondents were asked to
indicate their knowledge level regarding word
processing, spreadsheet, database, accounting,
e-mail, Internet, and computer-assisted production
management applications based on bipolar
anchors with a fve-point scale anchored between
no knowledge and extensive knowledge.
c. Manager accounting knowledge
Using the same scale as IS knowledge, respondents
were asked to indicate their knowledge level
relating to fnancial and managerial accounting
techniques.
d. Sources of advice (external and internal
expertise)
Four main sources of external expertise
identifed from the literature were included in the
questionnaire: consultants, vendors, government
agencies, and accounting frms. The questionnaire
asked the respondents to identify the sources of
advice used by their frms. They were then asked to
rate the effectiveness of each external expert based
on bipolar anchors with a fve-point scale anchored
between very ineffective and very effective.
e. IS effectiveness
Al-Mushayt (2000) developed six questions
to measure IS effectiveness based on DeLone
and McLeans (1992) taxonomy. Using similar
questions, the respondents were asked, based on
bipolar anchors with a fve-point scale anchored
between strongly disagree and strongly agree,
to indicate the level of effectiveness of their IS
regarding systems quality, information quality,
information use, user satisfaction, individual
impact, and organisational impact.
RESULTS
Descriptive Statistics
A total of 232 frms responded to the survey
after a period of 10 weeks and two follow-up
reminders, resulting in about a 32% response
rate. Preliminary analysis of the sample showed
that 71% of respondent frms were established
more than 10 years ago, which suggested that
most respondent frms were mature companies.
About 39% of respondent frms had between 20
and 50 full-time employees, while the remaining
frms (61%) had between 51 and 150 full-time
employees. Most of respondent firms (87%)
reported that they had used computers for more
than fve years, while the remaining frms (13%)
had only used computers for fve years or less.
This is an interesting fnding as it suggests that
respondent frms had considerable experience
with computers.
Regarding IS sophistication, the results
of this study showed that the software applications
used the most by respondent frms were accounting
(95%), word processing (82%), email (69%),
spreadsheet (66%), and the Internet (60%). The
most popular accounting modules adopted by
respondent firms were general ledger (91%),
accounts receivable (93%), accounts payable
(93%), payroll (78%), billing (74%), inventory
(70%), order entry (62%), and purchasing
(60%). Overall, respondent firms primarily
used administrative and transactional-based
applications. The adoption of analytical-based
applications such as budgeting, production
planning, modelling, and project management is
still minimal. The fndings were consistent with
the results reported by Lefebvre and Lefebvre
(1988), Raymond (1992), Bridge and Peel (1999),
and Foong (1999). These studies reported that
SMEs used computers mainly for administrative
h
t
t
p
:
/
/
m
m
j
.
u
u
m
.
e
d
u
.
m
y
28
Malaysian Management Journal 13 (1 & 2), 21-34 (2009)
and operational tasks rather than for strategic
planning.
Regarding external experts, the results
indicated that most respondent firms sought
support from multiple external experts for their
IS implementation. The majority of respondent
frms (81%) reported that they sought advice from
vendors, consultants (60%), accounting frms
(47%), and also government agencies (29%).
These fndings were consistent with the results
reported by previous studies.
Table 1 presents the descriptive statistics
for the main variables. To reiterate, the first
objective of this study was to explore the level of
managerial participation in IS implementation, IS
and accounting knowledge, and the use of external
experts. The results indicated that respondent
frms perceived their IS implementation as fairly
effective (mean = 3.38). Most managers of
respondent frms participated highly in frms IS
implementation (mean = 4.03). However, their
IS knowledge (mean = 2.67) and accounting
knowledge (mean = 2.66) are only above average.
When asked about the effectiveness of external
experts, respondent frms rated accounting frms
(mean = 3.23) as the most effective, followed
by consultants (mean = 3.16), vendors (mean =
3.14), and government agencies (mean = 2.87).
The element of trust could explain the fnding. For
example, Davis (1997) argued that most SMEs
treated accounting frms as their most trusted
business advisors. Furthermore, accounting frms
are more knowledgeable about their clients and
their clients businesses and thus could help them
implement effective IS that meets their business
requirements.
Table 1: Descriptive Statistics
Variables Mean SD
X
1
Participation 4.03 1.20
X
2
IS knowledge 2.67 0.45
X
3
Accounting knowledge 2.66 0.63
X
4
Consultants 3.16 0.72
X
5
Vendors 3.14 0.57
X
6
Government agencies 2.87 0.99
X
7
Accounting frms 3.23 0.85
X
8
IS effectiveness 3.38 0.60
Hypotheses Testing
The second objective of this study was to identify
factors that infuence IS effectiveness. For this
purpose, seven potential factors, managerial
participation in IS implementation, managerial
IS and accounting knowledge, effectiveness
of consultants, vendors, government agencies,
and accounting firms, were tested against
IS effectiveness using a multiple regression
technique. Multiple regression is one of the most
widely used techniques in the analysis of data in
the social sciences (Bryman & Cramer, 2001). The
technique can be used to analyse the relationship
between a single dependent variable and several
independent variables (Tabachnick & Fidell,
2001). The objective of the analysis was to predict
the changes in the dependent variable in response
to changes in the independent variables, whereby
each independent variable is weighted by the
regression analysis procedure to ensure maximal
prediction from the set of independent variables
(Hair, Anderson, Tatham, & Black, 1998).
Before performi ng t he mul t i pl e
regression procedure, a factor analysis was
conducted on all six items that measured IS
effectiveness to fnd out whether they could be
treated as a single measure. Al-Mushayt (2000)
found the construct as unidimensional, reliable,
and can be summated. The test was conducted
using principal component analysis and varimax
rotation with Kaiser Normalisation. The results of
the test showed that there is only one factor with an
Eigenvalue of more than 1, which explained 63%
of the variance. The Cronbachs coeffcient alpha
for the overall IS effectiveness is 0.92. Similar to
Al-Mushayt (2000), the results suggested that the
IS effectiveness measures could be combined as a
single measure and used as a dependent variable.
In interpreting the regression variate,
Hair et al. (1998) warned that the researcher
must be aware of the impact of multicollinearity.
Highly collinear variables can distort the results
substantially and thus make them not generalisable.
According to Bryman and Cramer (2001), the
Pearsons r between each pair of independent
variables should not exceed 0.80, otherwise the
independent variables that show a relationship
at or in excess of 0.80 may be suspected of
h
t
t
p
:
/
/
m
m
j
.
u
u
m
.
e
d
u
.
m
y
29
Malaysian Management Journal 13 (1 & 2), 21-34 (2009)
exhibiting multicollinearity. The output in Table
2 showed that none of the correlations between
all independent variables exceed 0.80, which
indicated that multicollinearity does not exist.
Another two common measures for assessing
multicollinearity are the tolerance and variance
infation factor (VIF) values. A common cut-off
threshold is a tolerance value of 0.10, which
corresponds to a VIF value above 10 (Hair et al.,
1998). From the output, it was observed that the
tolerance values for total AIS capacity and total
moderation were above 0.10. Likewise the VIF
values for both variables are less than 10, thus
confrming that the multicollinearity problem does
not exist.
Table 2: Correlation Matrix between Independent
Variables
X
1
X
2
X
3
X
4
X
5
X
6
X
7
X
1
1.00 .184 .398 .158 .176 .141 .034
X
2
1.00 .630 .007 .145 .358 .199
X
3
1.00 .009 .001 .105 .342
X
4
1.00 .062 .546 .433
X
5
1.00 .113 .234
X
6
1.00 .360
X
7
1.00
The results of multiple regression
analysis displayed the correlations between
the variables, the unstandardised regression
coeffcient (B) and intercept, the standardised
regression coeffcient (b), R, R
2
, and adjusted
R
2
. A summary of results are shown in Table
3. The multiple R under consideration is 0.641
(R
2
= 0.411). The F value of 3.987 is signifcant
at the 0.01 level, suggesting that it is extremely
improbable that R in the population is zero.
While the F ratio is useful as a test of statistical
significance for the equation as a whole, a t
value for each coefficient and an associated
two-tailed signifcant test represent a test of the
statistical signifcance of the individual regression
coeffcients. The output indicated that manager
accounting knowledge (
3
= 0.661; p<0.01),
vendor effectiveness (
5
= 0.348; p<0.01), and
accounting frm effectiveness (
7
= 0.531; p<0.01)
contribute signifcantly to regression with t values
of 3.893, 2.578, and 3.299 respectively, thus
providing support for H
3
, H
5
, and H
7
. Managerial
participation in IS implementation, manager
IS knowledge, consultant effectiveness, and
accounting frm effectiveness appear unimportant.
Table 3: Regression of X
8
against X
1
, X
2
, X
3
, X
4
,
X
5
, X
6
and X
7
Variables
Regression
coeffcient
T value Signifcance
X
1
Participation .055 0.381 .705
X
2
IS knowledge .094 0.506 .616
X
3
Accounting
knowledge
.661 3.893 .000*
X
4
Consultants .282 1.636 .110
X
5
Vendors .348 2.578 .014*
X
6
Government
agencies
.251 1.363 .181
X
7
Accounting frms .531 3.299 .002*
R = 0.641; R
2
= 0.411; Adjusted R
2
= 0.308; F = 3.987; p < 0.001
DISCUSSION
The objectives of this study were twofold.
Firstly, this study explored the level of manager
participation in IS implementation, IS knowledge,
accounting knowledge, and the effectiveness of
external experts among manufacturing SMEs in
Malaysia. Secondly, it examined the relationships
between IS effectiveness and seven potential
influence factors: managerial participation in
IS implementation, manager IS knowledge,
manager accounting knowledge, consultant
effectiveness, vendor effectiveness, government
agency effectiveness, and accounting firm
effectiveness.
Results of this study revealed that
respondent frms had considerable experience
with computers, whereby 87% of the frms had
used computers for more than five years. In
terms of IS sophistication, most respondent frms
used the computer mainly for administrative and
operational tasks. The adoption of analytical-
based applications for strategic decision-making
is still minimal. These fndings were in tandem
with those of previous studies such as Foong
(1999) and Hussin et al. (2002). Most respondent
firms also reported that they sought support
from multiple external experts such as vendors,
consultants, accounting frms, and government
agencies for their IS implementation. Similar to
h
t
t
p
:
/
/
m
m
j
.
u
u
m
.
e
d
u
.
m
y
30
Malaysian Management Journal 13 (1 & 2), 21-34 (2009)
fndings from previous studies (Thong, 2001; de
Guinea et al., 2005), the most sought after external
experts are vendors and consultants. Despite this,
it is interesting to note that respondent frms rated
accounting frms as their most effective external
expert. A possible reason is that accounting frms,
compared to other external experts, are more
knowledgeable about their clients businesses
and thus can help them implement effective IS.
Furthermore, Davis (1997) argued that SMEs
rely on accounting frms as their most trusted
business advisors. It is also interesting to note
the level of managerial participation in IS
implementation among respondent frms. Despite
their average IS and accounting knowledge,
managers of the frms participate highly in their
frms IS implementation. The respondent frms
also perceive their IS implementation as fairly
effective.
Finally, IS effectiveness was tested
against seven independent variables. Similar
to Al-Mushayt (2000), IS effectiveness is
conceptualised as a unidimensional construct.
The results of this study supported the hypotheses
regarding the relationships between managers
accounting knowledge and IS effectiveness
(H
3
), vendors effectiveness and IS effectiveness
(H
5
), and accounting frms effectiveness and
IS effectiveness (H
7
). It is also interesting to
note that managers accounting knowledge (t =
3.893) appeared to have greater impact on the
effectiveness of IS implementation among SMEs,
compared to the advice offered by accounting
frms (t = 3.299) and vendors (t = 2.578). This
evidence suggested that, while gaining advice
from external experts such as accounting frms and
vendors could be important to SMEs, managers
accounting knowledge is crucial for the frms to
implement effective IS. Furthermore, since most
SMEs adopted accounting-based applications,
accounting knowledge is becoming more of a
necessity for managers of SMEs. These fndings
implied that managers accounting knowledge,
probably with the help of effective external
experts, plays a crucial role for SMEs to achieve
better IS effectiveness.
However, manager participation in IS
implementation (H
1
), manager IS knowledge (H
2
),
consultant effectiveness (H
4
), and government
agency effectiveness (H
6
) appeared unimportant
in this study. The unexpected result relating to
the relationship between managerial participation
in IS implementation and IS effectiveness could
be explained by Jarvenpaa and Ives (1991)
study. Jarvenpaa and Ives found executive
involvement (or the degree of importance placed
on IS by the managers) is more important than
executive participation (or managers substantive
interventions). Therefore, as argued by Hussin et
al. (2002) and Ismail and King (2007), possessing
good knowledge of accounting could ft into this
concept of involvement because accounting
knowledge would help managers (probably with
the help of external experts) to decide on the right
software to support the frms information needs
and thus make IS more effective.
This study also did not fnd support for
(H
2
), which postulated a positive relationship
between managers IS knowledge and IS
effectiveness. Similarly, this study also did not
fnd support for (H
4
), which postulated a positive
relationship between consultant effectiveness and
IS effectiveness. These rather unexpected fndings
could be a refection of the frms having greater IT
maturity and thus seeking direct expert advice such
as vendors and accounting frms. The availability
of powerful but user-friendly packages might also
explain these fndings. Furthermore, technical
advice from vendors might be suffcient for the
firms. As Zarowin (1998) argued, the simple
business structure of SMEs may also facilitate the
tasks of identifying and tailoring IS to the frms
strategy and information needs. Thinking in the
context of SMEs, these advantages may increase
their understanding of business information
requirements and accessibility to sophisticated
IS, and this eventually leads to more effective
IS. Finally, this study also did not fnd support
for (H
6
), which postulated a positive relationship
between the effectiveness of government agencies
and IS effectiveness. The findings suggested
that while government assistance is important
in accelerating IS adoption among SMEs (Yap
& Thong, 1997), it may not necessarily result in
better IS effectiveness.
Implications
The fndings of this study have several implications
for research and practice. With respect to research,
h
t
t
p
:
/
/
m
m
j
.
u
u
m
.
e
d
u
.
m
y
31
Malaysian Management Journal 13 (1 & 2), 21-34 (2009)
there are three main implications. Firstly,
there is a positive and signifcant association
between manager accounting knowledge and
IS effectiveness, vendor effectiveness and IS
effectiveness, and accounting frms effectiveness
and IS effectiveness. Thus, this study has
complemented previous research by having
supported this association within a Malaysian
context. Further studies may replicate this study
to enhance the external validity of the results.
Secondly, there are contradictory findings
between this study and previous literature with
respect to the relation of manager IS knowledge
and IS effectiveness, consultant effectiveness
and IS effectiveness, and government agency
effectiveness and IS effectiveness. There are
a number of potential phenomena, such as
SMEs IS maturity, that may affect the results.
Future research could include these potential
sources of differences in order to provide an
empirical explanation of the differences between
these results and previous fndings. Therefore,
fndings of this study can only confrm parts of
the arguments put forward by both technology
diffusion and resource-based theories. Finally, it
would be interesting to expand the research model
by introducing new constructs such as sources of
software and time to plan for IS, while using a
more sophisticated techniques, such as structural
equation modelling.
This study has three implications for
practice. Firstly, managers of SMEs need to
acquire suffcient accounting knowledge since
accounting is the most important component of
modern IS within SMEs. Being the person that
best understands firms business operations,
accounting knowledge would further help the
managers to identify business information
requirements, and probably with the help of
qualifed and effective vendor, would be able
to choose the right technology to meet those
needs. Secondly, SMEs should engage qualifed
vendors who have experience and understand
unique characteristics of the SME. Qualified
vendors can also help SMEs overcome their lack
of IS knowledge and thus SMEs should take
the opportunity to increase IS knowledge of the
business. Merely engaging external experts such
as vendors would not guarantee future IS success
without a proper transfer of knowledge to the
frms. Finally, SMEs should also exploit the good
relationship with their accounting frms. Being the
most trusted advisors to the SMEs, accounting
frms are also the only external party that best
understand their clients business, and thus are
in a better position to help SMEs identify their
business information requirements, and with
the help of vendors, would contribute to more
effective IS. Therefore, it is important for SMEs
to learn from their IS implementation so that
opportunities can be recognised and priority given
to initiatives that help IS support their information
needs.
Limitations and Future Research Opportunities
It is important to note that this study was
exploratory in nature and thus subject to a number
of limitations which can be addressed in future
research. The frst limitation is related to the
sample bias that might affect the generalisation of
the fndings. The sample was selected from a list of
Malaysian manufacturing SMEs, and thus cannot
be generalised to all SMEs. There are potential
differences in the levels of IS sophistication among
manufacturing SMEs and non-manufacturing
SMEs, and between manufacturing SMEs
in developing economies like Malaysia and
manufacturing SMEs in developed economies.
For example, manufacturing SMEs in developed
countries may have greater access to IS benefts
and services offered by relevant agencies when
compared to those in developing countries. The
second limitation of this study relates to the
defnition of the SME itself. While it is generally
accepted that the number of employees could
be used as a surrogate measure for frm size,
expanding the defnition to include the sales or
revenue of the frms may produce different results.
Finally, the study was based on a survey. This
approach has shortcomings because it captures
a situation or an event at a specific point in
time. Future research could employ qualitative
approaches such as case studies or a longitudinal
study to further understand how SMEs implement
their IS.
h
t
t
p
:
/
/
m
m
j
.
u
u
m
.
e
d
u
.
m
y
32
Malaysian Management Journal 13 (1 & 2), 21-34 (2009)
CONCLUSIONS
This paper examined seven hypotheses concerning
the effectiveness of IS implementation in the
specific context of manufacturing SMEs in
Malaysia. More importantly, this study has
highlighted two variables, manager accounting
knowledge and accounting firms, which has
received little attention in the literature. By
systematically testing the seven hypotheses
against IS effectiveness, associations between
three variables and IS effectiveness were found,
thus confrming part of the arguments put forward
by technology diffusion and resource-based
theories. The evidence suggests that the major
factors that infuenced IS effectiveness among
the sample firms were manager accounting
knowledge, vendor effectiveness, and accounting
frm effectiveness. Thus, this study has made
an important contribution by increasing the
current understanding of IS implementation
and its influence factors in SMEs. Manager
participation in IS implementation, manager IS
knowledge, consultant and government agency
effectiveness, however, seemed to have an
insignifcant relationship with IS effectiveness.
These unexpected fndings indicates the need for
further research into the processes associated with
the effectiveness of IS implementation in SMEs.
REFERENCES
Al-Mushayt, O. S. (2000). An empirical
investigation of factors influencing the
successful treatment of organizational
issues in information systems development.
( Unpubl i s hed PhD Di s s er t at i on) ,
Loughborough University, UK.
Attawell, P. (1992). Technology diffusion and
organizational learning: The case of business
computing. Organization Science, 3(1), 1-19.
Bailey, J.E., & Pearson, S.W. (1983). Development
of a tool for measuring and analyzing
computer user satisfaction. Management
Science, 29(5), 530-545.
Ballantine, J., Levy, M., & Powell, P. (1998).
Evaluating information systems in small
and medium-sized enterprises: Issues and
evidence. European Journal of Information
Systems, 7, 241-251.
Breen, J., & Sciulli, N. (2002). Use of computerized
record keeping in small business. Small
Business Research Unit, Victoria University.
Bridge, J., & Peel, M.J. (1999). Research note:
A study of computer usage and strategic
planning in the SME sector. International
Small Business Journal, 17(4), 82-87.
Bryman, A., & Cramer, D. (2001). Quantitative
Data Analysis with SPSS Release 10 for
Windows: A guide for social scientists. East
Essex: Routledge.
Burgess, S. (2002). Information technology in
small business: Issues and solutions. In
S. Burgess (Ed.), Managing information
technology in small business: Challenges and
solutions, (1-17). Hershey, PA: Idea Group
Publishing.
Cragg, P.B., & King, M. (1993). Small-firm
computing: Motivators and inhibitor. MIS
Quarterly, March, 47-60.
Cragg, P.B., King, M., & Hussin, H. (2002). IT
alignment and frm performance in small
manufacturing frms. Journal of Strategic
Information Systems, 11, 109-132.
Davis, M. (1997). Transforming your frm: Tools
for successful technology consulting. The
Practical Accountant, 30(8), S-3.
de Guinea, A.O., Kelley, H., & Hunter, M.G.
(2005). Information systems effectiveness
in small business: Extending a Singaporean
model in Canada. Journal of Global
Information Management, 13(3), 55-70.
DeLone, W., & McLean, E. (1992). Information
system success: The quest for dependent
variables. Information Systems Research,
3(1), 60-95.
Dillman, D.A. (1978). Mail and telephone
surveys: The total design method. New York:
John Wiley and Sons.
Duxbury, L., Decady, Y., & Tse, A. (2002).
Adopting and use of computer technology
in Canadian small businesses: A comparative
study. In S. Burgess (Ed.), Managing
information technology in small business:
Challenges and solutions, (19-47). Hershey,
PA: Idea Group Publishing.
h
t
t
p
:
/
/
m
m
j
.
u
u
m
.
e
d
u
.
m
y
33
Malaysian Management Journal 13 (1 & 2), 21-34 (2009)
El Louadi, M. (1998). The relationship among
organi zat i on st ruct ure, i nformat i on
technology and information processing in
small Canadian frms. Canadian Journal of
Administrative Sciences, 15(2), 180-199.
Foong, S.Y. (1999). Effect of end-user personal
and systems attributes on computer-based
information system success in Malaysian
SMEs. Journal of Smal l Busi ness
Management, July, 81-87.
Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., & Black,
W.C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. (5th
Ed.). London: Prentice Hall.
Hartcher, J. (2003). Small business survey
program: Financial management, insolvency
and fraud. Australia: CPA Australia.
Huber, G.P. (1990). A theory of the effects
of advanced information technologies on
organizational design, intelligence, and
decision making. Academy of Management
Review, 15(1), 47-71.
Hunter, M.G., & Long, W.A. (2002). Information
technology and small business: Lessons from
the entrepreneurial process. A paper presented
at the Information Resources Management
Association Conference (IRMA), May,
Seattle, Washington.
Hunter, M.G., & Long, W.A. (2003). Adopting
the entrepreneurial process in the study of
information systems and small business. In G.
Gingrich (Ed.), Managing IT in government,
business, and communities. Hershey, PA:
IRM Press.
Hunton, J.E., & Flowers, L. (1997). Information
technology in accounting: Assessing the
impact on accountants and organizations.
Advances in Accounting Information Systems,
5, 3-34.
Hussin, H., King, M., & Cragg, P.B. (2002). IT
alignment in small frms. European Journal
of Information Systems, 11, 108-127.
Igbaria, M., Zinatelli, N., Cragg, P.B., &
Cavaye, A.L.M. (1997). Personal computing
acceptance factors in small frms: A structural
equation model. MIS Quarterly, 21(3), 279-
305.
Ismail, N.A., Tayib, M., & Abdullah, S.N. (2003).
Computer-based accounting systems: The
case of manufacturing-based small and
medium enterprise in the northern region
of peninsular Malaysia. Jurnal Teknologi,
39, 19-36.
Ismail, N. A. , & King, M. (2005). Firm
performance and AIS alignment in Malaysian
SMEs. International Journal of Accounting
Information Systems, 6(4), 241-259.
Ismail, N.A., & King, M. (2007). Factors
influencing the alignment of accounting
information systems in small and medium
sized Malaysian manufacturing firms.
Journal of Information Systems and Small
Business, 1(1/2), 1-19.
Jarvenpaa, S.L., & Ives, B. (1991). Executive
involvement and participation in the
management of information technology.
MIS Quarterly, 15(2), 205-227.
Lai, V.S. (1994). A survey of rural small business
computer use: Success factors and decision
support. Information & Management, 26,
297-304.
Lefebvre, L. A. , & Lefebvre, E. (1988).
Computerization of small firms: A study
of the perceptions and expectations of
managers. Journal of Small Business and
Entrepreneurship, 5(5), 48-58.
Lertwongsatien, C., & Wongpinunwatana, N.
(2003). E-commerce adoption in Thailand:
An empirical study of small and medium
enterprises. Journal of Global Information
Technology Management, 6(3), 67-83.
Lucas, H.C., Jr. (1981). Implementation: The key
to successful information systems. New York:
McGraw-Hill.
Magal, S.R., & Lewis, C.D. (1995). Determinants
of information technology success in small
businesses. Journal of Computer Information
Systems, 35(3), 75-83.
Marriot, N., & Marriot, P. (2000). Professional
accountants and the development of a
management accounting service for the small
frm: Barriers and possibilities. Management
Accounting Research, 11, 475-492.
Mitchell, F., Reid, G., & Smith, J. (2000).
Information system development in the small
frm: The use of management accounting.
Place: CIMA Publishing.
Montazemi, Ali R. (1988). Factors affecting
information satisfaction in the context of the
small business environment. MIS Quarterly,
12(2), 239-256.
h
t
t
p
:
/
/
m
m
j
.
u
u
m
.
e
d
u
.
m
y
34
Malaysian Management Journal 13 (1 & 2), 21-34 (2009)
Pollard, C.E., & Hayne, S.C. (1997). The changing
face of information system issues in small
frms. International Small Business Journal,
16(3), 70-87.
Raymond, L. (1990). Organizational context and
information systems success: A contingency
appr oach. Journal of Management
Information Systems, 6(4), 5-18.
Raymond, L. (1992). Computerization as a factor
in the development of young entrepreneurs.
International Small Business Journal, 11(1),
23-34.
Raymond, L., & Bergeron, F. (1992). Personal
DSS success in small enterprises. Information
& Management, 22, 301-308.
Seddon, P.B. (1997). A respecification and
extension of the DeLone and McLean Model
of information systems success. Information
Systems Research, 8(3), 240-253.
Seyal, A., Rahim, M.N., & Rahim, N. (2000).
An empirical investigation of the use of
information technology among small
and medium business organizations: A
Bruneian scenario. The Electronic Journal
of Information Systems in Developing
Countries, 2(7), 117.
Seyal, A.H., & Abd Rahman, M.N. (2003). A
preliminary investigation of e-commerce
adoption in small and medium enterprises
in Brunei. Journal of Global Information
Technology Management, 6(2), 6-26.
Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2001). Using
Multivariate Statistics (4th ed.). London: A
Pearson Education Company.
Thong, J.Y.L., Yap, C.S., & Raman, K.S.
(1994). Engagement of external expertise in
information systems implementation. Journal
of Management Information Systems, 11(2),
209-231.
Thong, J.Y.L., & Yap, C.S. (1995). CEO
characteristics, organizational characteristics
and information technology adoption in small
businesses. OMEGA International Journal of
Management Science, 23(4), 429-442.
Thong, J.Y.L., Yap, C.S., & Raman, K.S. (1996).
Top management support, external expertise
and information systems implementation
in small businesses. Information Systems
Research, 7(2), 248-267.
Thong, J.Y.L. (1999). An integrated model
of information systems adoption in small
business. Journal of Management Information
Systems, 15(4), 187-214.
Thong, J.Y.L. (2001). Resource constraints
and information systems implementation
in Singaporean small business. OMEGA
International Journal of Management
Science, 29, 143-156.
Wennerfelt, B.A. (1995). The resource-based
view of the frm: Ten years later. Strategic
Management Journal, 16(3), 171-174.
Yap, C.S. (1989). Issues in managing information
technology. Journal of Operational Research
Society, 40(7), 649-658.
Yap, C.S., Soh, C.P., & Raman, K.S. (1992).
Information systems success factors in small
business. OMEGA International Journal of
Management Science, 20(5/6), 597-609.
Yap, C.S., & Thong, J.Y.L. (1997). Programme
evaluation of a government information
technology programme for small businesses.
Journal of Information Technology, 12,
107-120.
Zarowin, S. (1998). Accounting software: The
road ahead. Journal of Accountancy, January,
67-69.
h
t
t
p
:
/
/
m
m
j
.
u
u
m
.
e
d
u
.
m
y