7 2007 Dec A
7 2007 Dec A
9
(ii) Flexible budgets
A flexible budget is a budget, which, by recognising different cost behaviour patterns, is designed to change as volumes
of output change.
Its advantages are:
– It recognises that different costs behave in different ways with respect to volume.
– It improves the quality of control information as it facilitates a comparison of like with like. Variances calculated
against a flexed budget will give more meaningful control information than those against a fixed budget.
– It allows managers to forecast revenues, costs and profits at different activity levels and forces them to think about
cost behaviour.
(iii) Zero-based budgeting
Zero-based budgeting (ZBB), as its name suggests, involves preparing a budget from a zero-base. Budget holders are
told to assume that they had no budget allowance for particular activities and they would then be required to justify any
expenditure in order for it to be included in the budget.
The advantages of ZBB are:
– Identification and elimination of unnecessary expenditure. Activities that do not contribute toward organisational
objectives will be discontinued.
– Identification of wasteful expenditure. Overspending on activities will be identified and budgets will be reduced
accordingly.
– It challenges the status quo and encourages a questioning approach to activities and expenditure. In this way it is
the ideal antidote for incremental budgeting.
– The documentation that ZBB requires provides an in depth appraisal of an organisation’s activities.
– It provides a plan to work to (in service departments) if more funds become available.
Note: only two advantages of each method were required.
10
(b) Discussion of performance.
(i) Financial success
Nicholson’s return on capital employed at 25% is much higher than the industry average and this indicates that it is
generating a good return on the money invested in it. This is largely explained by a return on sales of 10%, exactly
double that of the industry average company. This could be due to higher prices, lower costs, or both. The only financial
weakness apparent is that Nicholson does not enjoy as high a sales per $ of capital employed as its competitors. Overall
the company appears to have performed well financially.
(ii) Customer satisfaction
Nicholson does not perform as well as the industry average in this area. It is losing customers at twice the rate of the
industry average company. It is often much easier to retain existing customers than to win new ones. The level of
customer complaints is also much higher than average. These factors will result in lost sales. They should be seen as
leading indicators of future financial problems.
(iii) Process Efficiency
The two processes that appear in the statistics are telephone repair and bill enquiries. On both counts Nicholson
performs badly. Telephone repair appears to take an average of nearly 30 days (as compared to a two day industry
average). This will prove annoying to customers and will probably result in lost sales (customers cannot make calls
without telephones). Similarly delays in processing bill enquiries will eventually result in dissatisfied customers and poor
financial results.
(iv) Organisational learning and growth
Less than 2% of Nicholson’s income comes from new products, as compared to 20% for the industry average company.
In a sector characterised by changing technology and product innovation this is very poor. Failing to innovate is a failing
to compete. Eventually this will result in lost sales and profits.
In conclusion the company’s financial results have been good in the past year, but the prospects for the future appear
poor unless improvements are made to customer service, process efficiency and innovation.
(b) Variances
(i) Total overhead absorbed in period 9
Fixed overhead absorbed = 6,500 actual tonnes x $24 per tonne
= $156,000
(ii) and (iii) Fixed overhead expenditure and volume variances
Actual fixed overhead expenditure $125,000
Expenditure variance > $5,000 adverse
Budgeted fixed overhead expenditure $120,000
Volume variance > $36,000 favourable
Absorbed fixed overhead
6,500 tonnes x $24 per tonne $156,000
11
(c) Two possible operational causes for each of the two variances.
(i) Adverse Expenditure Variance
Potential causes of an adverse expenditure variance are
– An increase in the cost of services used.
– Wasteful expenditure.
– A change in the type of services used.
(ii) Favourable Volume Variance
Potential causes of a favourable volume variance are
– Seasonal demand leading to higher than average production levels.
– Favourable labour efficiency leading to increased production.
– Increased factory capacity due to the removal of a bottleneck.
(only two causes of each were requested)
12
(c) Memorandum
To General manager, Overlook hotel
From An accounting technician
Subject: Hotel closure
Date: Today
I note your proposal to close the hotel for February and March 2008.
Basis of the decision.
The decision to close the hotel should be made on a relevant cost basis. That is, it should only be closed if the incremental
costs of remaining open exceed the incremental revenues we could earn.
Information required.
To calculate the incremental costs and revenues we will need the following information.
– Budgeted prices, volumes and costs for 2008. There is no guarantee that 2008 demand conditions will be exactly the
same as 2007.
– The behaviour of fixed costs during the closure period. It is unwise to assume that all fixed costs can be avoided during
the temporary closure. Although the bulk of service costs can probably be avoided, insurance, repairs and depreciation
costs may well continue to be incurred.
– A detailed analysis of budgeted service costs over the year. They are likely to vary seasonally.
– The behaviour of variable costs during the closure period. Closure will not necessarily lead to a saving of all variable
costs. For example we may need to pay staff wages during closure in order that we retain staff for when we reopen.
– Will any incremental closure or reopening costs be incurred? For example will heating systems have to be
decommissioned, will we need to pay for security guards during the closure period, will extra cleaning be required before
reopening.
– The effect of closure on demand. Temporary closure would cause difficulties for any permanent residents we may have.
If they move to other hotels we may lose more than two months sales. Closure for two months may have an impact on
demand at other times of year, for example travel agents may stop recommending us if we don’t provide an all year
service.
I hope you find this useful. Please contact me if you wish to discuss the matter further.
(Only three items of information were required)
13
ACCA Certified Accounting Technician Examination – Paper T7
Planning, Control and Performance Management December 2007 Marking Scheme
15
3 (a) (i) method 1
variable cost 1
–––
2
(ii) Substitution approach 1
Fixed overhead 1
–––
2
16