0% found this document useful (0 votes)
46 views22 pages

Data Statistik

The document is a summary of crosstabulation analysis results from SPSS comparing various patient characteristics (age, gender, education level, etc.) to patient adherence levels. It includes 11 crosstabulation tables with test statistics like chi-square values. Key findings include no significant associations between adherence and factors like age, gender, occupation or years suffered, while adherence was significantly associated with income level, education level and number of complications.

Uploaded by

Okty Fitria
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
46 views22 pages

Data Statistik

The document is a summary of crosstabulation analysis results from SPSS comparing various patient characteristics (age, gender, education level, etc.) to patient adherence levels. It includes 11 crosstabulation tables with test statistics like chi-square values. Key findings include no significant associations between adherence and factors like age, gender, occupation or years suffered, while adherence was significantly associated with income level, education level and number of complications.

Uploaded by

Okty Fitria
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 22

CROSSTABS

/TABLES=umurkelaminkerjaGajipendidikanLamakomplikasiregimenESOpengetahuandukunganBYkepatuhan
/FORMAT=AVALUETABLES
/STATISTICS=CHISQCC
/CELLS=COUNTCOLUMNRESID
/COUNTROUNDCELL.

Crosstabs
Output Created
Comments
Data
Active Dataset
Filter
Weight
Split File
N of Rows in Working
Data File
Definition of Missing
Cases Used
Syntax
Processor Time
Elapsed Time
Dimensions Requested
Cells Available
Input
Missing Value Handling
Resources
174762
2
00:00:00.072
00:00:00.063
CROSSTABS
/TABLES=umur kelamin kerja Gaji
pendidikan Lama komplikasi
regimen ESO pengetahuan
dukungan BY kepatuhan
/FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES
/STATISTICS=CHISQ CC
/CELLS=COUNT COLUMN RESID
/COUNT ROUND CELL.
Statistics for each table are based
on all the cases with valid data in
the specified range(s) for all
variables in each table.
User-defined missing values are
treated as missing.
85
<none>
<none>
<none>
DataSet1
C:\Users\Fitri\Desktop\kepatuhan
DM\Skripsi\SPSS\DATAku_1.sav

25-Mar-2014 08:38:57
Notes

[DataSet1]C:\Users\Fitri\Desktop\kepatuhanDM\Skripsi\SPSS\DATAku_1.sav
Page 1
Percent N Percent N Percent N
Total Missing Valid
Cases
Umur * Kepatuhan
Jenis kelamin *
Kepatuhan
Pekerjaan * Kepatuhan
Penghasilan * Kepatuhan
Pendidikan * Kepatuhan
Lama Menderita *
Kepatuhan
Komplikasi * Kepatuhan
Regimen Terapi *
Kepatuhan
Efek Samping Obat *
Kepatuhan
Pengetahuan *
Kepatuhan
Dukungan Keluarga *
Kepatuhan
100.0% 85 .0% 0 100.0% 85
100.0% 85 .0% 0 100.0% 85
100.0% 85 .0% 0 100.0% 85
100.0% 85 .0% 0 100.0% 85
100.0% 85 .0% 0 100.0% 85
100.0% 85 .0% 0 100.0% 85
100.0% 85 .0% 0 100.0% 85
100.0% 85 .0% 0 100.0% 85
100.0% 85 .0% 0 100.0% 85
100.0% 85 .0% 0 100.0% 85
100.0% 85 .0% 0 100.0% 85
Case Processing Summary

Umur*Kepatuhan
Sangat Patuh Patuh Tidak Patuh Total
Kepatuhan
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Residual
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Residual
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Residual
20-34
35-45
46-59
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Total
Umur
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
85 15 38 32
.4 -3.8 3.4
70.6% 73.3% 60.5% 81.2%
60 11 23 26
-.7 4.6 -3.9
24.7% 20.0% 36.8% 12.5%
21 3 14 4
.3 -.8 .5
4.7% 6.7% 2.6% 6.2%
4 1 1 2
Crosstab
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided) df Value
Pearson Chi-Square
.196 4 6.038
a
Chi-Square Tests
a. 4 cells (44,4%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is ,71.
Page 2
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided) df Value
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
85
.455 1 .557
.183 4 6.220
Chi-Square Tests
a. 4 cells (44,4%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is ,71.
Approx. Sig. Value
Contingency Coefficient
N of Valid Cases
Nominal by Nominal
85
.196 .258
Symmetric Measures

Jeniskelamin*Kepatuhan
Sangat Patuh Patuh Tidak Patuh Total
Kepatuhan
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Residual
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Residual
Laki-Laki
Perempuan
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Total
Jenis kelamin
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
85 15 38 32
3.8 -2.9 -.8
68.2% 93.3% 60.5% 65.6%
58 14 23 21
-3.8 2.9 .8
31.8% 6.7% 39.5% 34.4%
27 1 15 11
Crosstab
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided) df Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
85
.137 1 2.213
.034 2 6.750
.064 2 5.502
a
Chi-Square Tests
a. 1 cells (16,7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is 4,76.
Approx. Sig. Value
Contingency Coefficient
N of Valid Cases
Nominal by Nominal
85
.064 .247
Symmetric Measures
Page 3

Pekerjaan*Kepatuhan
Sangat Patuh Patuh Tidak Patuh Total
Kepatuhan
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Residual
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Residual
Bekerja
Tidak Bekerja
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Total
Pekerjaan
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
85 15 38 32
1.5 -.9 -.7
36.5% 46.7% 34.2% 34.4%
31 7 13 11
-1.5 .9 .7
63.5% 53.3% 65.8% 65.6%
54 8 25 21
Crosstab
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided) df Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
85
.491 1 .473
.671 2 .798
.664 2 .817
a
Chi-Square Tests
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
5,47.
Approx. Sig. Value
Contingency Coefficient
N of Valid Cases
Nominal by Nominal
85
.664 .098
Symmetric Measures

Penghasilan*Kepatuhan
Sangat Patuh Patuh Tidak Patuh Total
Kepatuhan
Count < Rp 500.000 Penghasilan
42 12 15 15
Crosstab
Page 4
Sangat Patuh Patuh Tidak Patuh Total
Kepatuhan
% within Kepatuhan
Residual
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Residual
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Residual
< Rp 500.000
Rp 500.000-Rp 1.500.000
> Rp 1.500.000
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Total
Penghasilan
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
85 15 38 32
-1.4 4.5 -3.2
22.4% 13.3% 34.2% 12.5%
19 2 13 4
-3.2 -.7 4.0
28.2% 6.7% 26.3% 40.6%
24 1 10 13
4.6 -3.8 -.8
49.4% 80.0% 39.5% 46.9%
Crosstab
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided) df Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
85
.500 1 .456
.013 4 12.759
.016 4 12.228
a
Chi-Square Tests
a. 2 cells (22,2%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is 3,35.
Approx. Sig. Value
Contingency Coefficient
N of Valid Cases
Nominal by Nominal
85
.016 .355
Symmetric Measures

Pendidikan*Kepatuhan
Sangat Patuh Patuh Tidak Patuh Total
Kepatuhan
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Residual
Count
% within Kepatuhan
SD
SMP/SMA
Pendidikan
40.0% 33.3% 39.5% 43.8%
34 5 15 14
1.8 -4.3 2.6
48.2% 60.0% 36.8% 56.2%
41 9 14 18
Crosstab
Page 5
Sangat Patuh Patuh Tidak Patuh Total
Kepatuhan
Residual
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Residual
SMP/SMA
D3,S1,S2,S3
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Total
Pendidikan
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
85 15 38 32
-.8 4.5 -3.8
11.8% 6.7% 23.7% .0%
10 1 9 0
-1.0 -.2 1.2
Crosstab
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided) df Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
85
.402 1 .701
.008 4 13.665
.028 4 10.846
a
Chi-Square Tests
a. 3 cells (33,3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is 1,76.
Approx. Sig. Value
Contingency Coefficient
N of Valid Cases
Nominal by Nominal
85
.028 .336
Symmetric Measures

LamaMenderita*Kepatuhan
Sangat Patuh Patuh Tidak Patuh Total
Kepatuhan
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Residual
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Residual
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Residual
< 5 tahun
5-10 tahun
> 10 tahun
Lama Menderita
-.5 -1.3 1.7
16.5% 13.3% 13.2% 21.9%
14 2 5 7
1.6 2.8 -4.4
29.4% 40.0% 36.8% 15.6%
25 6 14 5
-1.1 -1.6 2.7
54.1% 46.7% 50.0% 62.5%
46 7 19 20
Crosstab
Page 6
Sangat Patuh Patuh Tidak Patuh Total
Kepatuhan
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Total
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
85 15 38 32
Crosstab
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided) df Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
85
.748 1 .103
.264 4 5.233
.292 4 4.952
a
Chi-Square Tests
a. 2 cells (22,2%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is 2,47.
Approx. Sig. Value
Contingency Coefficient
N of Valid Cases
Nominal by Nominal
85
.292 .235
Symmetric Measures

Komplikasi*Kepatuhan
Sangat Patuh Patuh Tidak Patuh Total
Kepatuhan
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Residual
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Residual
<= 2 penyakit
>= 3 penyakit
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Total
Komplikasi
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
85 15 38 32
-2.2 .0 2.2
21.2% 6.7% 21.1% 28.1%
18 1 8 9
2.2 .0 -2.2
78.8% 93.3% 78.9% 71.9%
67 14 30 23
Crosstab
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided) df Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
.194 2 3.283
.244 2 2.818
a
Chi-Square Tests
a. 1 cells (16,7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is 3,18.
Page 7
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided) df Value
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
85
.105 1 2.629
Chi-Square Tests
a. 1 cells (16,7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is 3,18.
Approx. Sig. Value
Contingency Coefficient
N of Valid Cases
Nominal by Nominal
85
.244 .179
Symmetric Measures

RegimenTerapi*Kepatuhan
Sangat Patuh Patuh Tidak Patuh Total
Kepatuhan
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Residual
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Residual
1 kali sehari
>= 2 kali sehari
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Total
Regimen Terapi
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
85 15 38 32
2.6 -4.7 2.0
62.4% 80.0% 50.0% 68.8%
53 12 19 22
-2.6 4.7 -2.0
37.6% 20.0% 50.0% 31.2%
32 3 19 10
Crosstab
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided) df Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
85
.852 1 .035
.076 2 5.152
.081 2 5.018
a
Chi-Square Tests
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
5,65.
Approx. Sig. Value
Contingency Coefficient Nominal by Nominal
.081 .236
Symmetric Measures
Page 8
Approx. Sig. Value
N of Valid Cases
85
Symmetric Measures

EfekSampingObat*Kepatuhan
Sangat Patuh Patuh Tidak Patuh Total
Kepatuhan
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Residual
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Residual
Tidak Ada
Ada
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Total
Efek Samping Obat
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
85 15 38 32
-1.0 -1.6 2.6
20.0% 13.3% 15.8% 28.1%
17 2 6 9
1.0 1.6 -2.6
80.0% 86.7% 84.2% 71.9%
68 13 32 23
Crosstab
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided) df Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
85
.175 1 1.836
.347 2 2.116
.340 2 2.158
a
Chi-Square Tests
a. 1 cells (16,7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is 3,00.
Approx. Sig. Value
Contingency Coefficient
N of Valid Cases
Nominal by Nominal
85
.340 .157
Symmetric Measures

Pengetahuan*Kepatuhan
Page 9
Sangat Patuh Patuh Tidak Patuh Total
Kepatuhan
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Residual
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Residual
Rendah
Tinggi
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Total
Pengetahuan
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
85 15 38 32
5.5 12.9 -18.3
63.5% 100.0% 97.4% 6.2%
54 15 37 2
-5.5 -12.9 18.3
36.5% .0% 2.6% 93.8%
31 0 1 30
Crosstab
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided) df Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
85
.000 1 55.413
.000 2 87.322
.000 2 72.705
a
Chi-Square Tests
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
5,47.
Approx. Sig. Value
Contingency Coefficient
N of Valid Cases
Nominal by Nominal
85
.000 .679
Symmetric Measures

DukunganKeluarga*Kepatuhan
Sangat Patuh Patuh Tidak Patuh Total
Kepatuhan
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Residual
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Residual
Tidak ada dukungan
Ada dukungan
Dukungan Keluarga
4.1 13.0 -17.1
65.9% 93.3% 100.0% 12.5%
56 14 38 4
-4.1 -13.0 17.1
34.1% 6.7% .0% 87.5%
29 1 0 28
Crosstab
Page 10
Sangat Patuh Patuh Tidak Patuh Total
Kepatuhan
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Total
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
85 15 38 32
Crosstab
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided) df Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
85
.000 1 45.321
.000 2 77.647
.000 2 65.277
a
Chi-Square Tests
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
5,12.
Approx. Sig. Value
Contingency Coefficient
N of Valid Cases
Nominal by Nominal
85
.000 .659
Symmetric Measures

CROSSTABS
/TABLES=kelaminkerjapendidikankomplikasiregimenESOpengetahuandukunganhasilusiadapetllllBYkepatuhan
/FORMAT=AVALUETABLES
/STATISTICS=CHISQCC
/CELLS=COUNTCOLUMNRESID
/COUNTROUNDCELL.

Crosstabs
Output Created
Comments
Data
Active Dataset
Filter
Weight
Input
<none>
<none>
DataSet1
C:\Users\Fitri\Desktop\kepatuhan
DM\Skripsi\SPSS\DATAku_1.sav

25-Mar-2014 08:40:35
Notes
Page 11
Split File
N of Rows in Working
Data File
Definition of Missing
Cases Used
Syntax
Processor Time
Elapsed Time
Dimensions Requested
Cells Available
Input
Missing Value Handling
Resources
174762
2
00:00:00.032
00:00:00.031
CROSSTABS
/TABLES=kelamin kerja
pendidikan komplikasi regimen
ESO pengetahuan dukungan hasil
usia dapet llll BY kepatuhan
/FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES
/STATISTICS=CHISQ CC
/CELLS=COUNT COLUMN RESID
/COUNT ROUND CELL.
Statistics for each table are based
on all the cases with valid data in
the specified range(s) for all
variables in each table.
User-defined missing values are
treated as missing.
85
<none>
Notes

[DataSet1]C:\Users\Fitri\Desktop\kepatuhanDM\Skripsi\SPSS\DATAku_1.sav
Percent N Percent N Percent N
Total Missing Valid
Cases
Jenis kelamin *
Kepatuhan
Pekerjaan * Kepatuhan
Pendidikan * Kepatuhan
Komplikasi * Kepatuhan
Regimen Terapi *
Kepatuhan
Efek Samping Obat *
Kepatuhan
Pengetahuan *
Kepatuhan
Dukungan Keluarga *
Kepatuhan
hasil * Kepatuhan
usia * Kepatuhan
penghasilan * Kepatuhan
Lama Menderita DM *
Kepatuhan
100.0% 85 .0% 0 100.0% 85
100.0% 85 .0% 0 100.0% 85
100.0% 85 .0% 0 100.0% 85
100.0% 85 .0% 0 100.0% 85
100.0% 85 .0% 0 100.0% 85
100.0% 85 .0% 0 100.0% 85
100.0% 85 .0% 0 100.0% 85
100.0% 85 .0% 0 100.0% 85
100.0% 85 .0% 0 100.0% 85
100.0% 85 .0% 0 100.0% 85
100.0% 85 .0% 0 100.0% 85
100.0% 85 .0% 0 100.0% 85
Case Processing Summary
Page 12

Jeniskelamin*Kepatuhan
Sangat Patuh Patuh Tidak Patuh Total
Kepatuhan
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Residual
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Residual
Laki-Laki
Perempuan
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Total
Jenis kelamin
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
85 15 38 32
3.8 -2.9 -.8
68.2% 93.3% 60.5% 65.6%
58 14 23 21
-3.8 2.9 .8
31.8% 6.7% 39.5% 34.4%
27 1 15 11
Crosstab
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided) df Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
85
.137 1 2.213
.034 2 6.750
.064 2 5.502
a
Chi-Square Tests
a. 1 cells (16,7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is 4,76.
Approx. Sig. Value
Contingency Coefficient
N of Valid Cases
Nominal by Nominal
85
.064 .247
Symmetric Measures

Pekerjaan*Kepatuhan
Sangat Patuh Patuh Tidak Patuh Total
Kepatuhan
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Residual
Bekerja Pekerjaan
-1.5 .9 .7
63.5% 53.3% 65.8% 65.6%
54 8 25 21
Crosstab
Page 13
Sangat Patuh Patuh Tidak Patuh Total
Kepatuhan
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Residual
Tidak Bekerja
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Total
Pekerjaan
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
85 15 38 32
1.5 -.9 -.7
36.5% 46.7% 34.2% 34.4%
31 7 13 11
Crosstab
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided) df Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
85
.491 1 .473
.671 2 .798
.664 2 .817
a
Chi-Square Tests
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
5,47.
Approx. Sig. Value
Contingency Coefficient
N of Valid Cases
Nominal by Nominal
85
.664 .098
Symmetric Measures

Pendidikan*Kepatuhan
Sangat Patuh Patuh Tidak Patuh Total
Kepatuhan
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Residual
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Residual
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Residual
SD
SMP/SMA
D3,S1,S2,S3
Pendidikan
-.8 4.5 -3.8
11.8% 6.7% 23.7% .0%
10 1 9 0
-1.0 -.2 1.2
40.0% 33.3% 39.5% 43.8%
34 5 15 14
1.8 -4.3 2.6
48.2% 60.0% 36.8% 56.2%
41 9 14 18
Crosstab
Page 14
Sangat Patuh Patuh Tidak Patuh Total
Kepatuhan
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Total
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
85 15 38 32
Crosstab
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided) df Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
85
.402 1 .701
.008 4 13.665
.028 4 10.846
a
Chi-Square Tests
a. 3 cells (33,3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is 1,76.
Approx. Sig. Value
Contingency Coefficient
N of Valid Cases
Nominal by Nominal
85
.028 .336
Symmetric Measures

Komplikasi*Kepatuhan
Sangat Patuh Patuh Tidak Patuh Total
Kepatuhan
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Residual
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Residual
<= 2 penyakit
>= 3 penyakit
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Total
Komplikasi
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
85 15 38 32
-2.2 .0 2.2
21.2% 6.7% 21.1% 28.1%
18 1 8 9
2.2 .0 -2.2
78.8% 93.3% 78.9% 71.9%
67 14 30 23
Crosstab
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided) df Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
.194 2 3.283
.244 2 2.818
a
Chi-Square Tests
a. 1 cells (16,7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is 3,18.
Page 15
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided) df Value
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
85
.105 1 2.629
Chi-Square Tests
a. 1 cells (16,7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is 3,18.
Approx. Sig. Value
Contingency Coefficient
N of Valid Cases
Nominal by Nominal
85
.244 .179
Symmetric Measures

RegimenTerapi*Kepatuhan
Sangat Patuh Patuh Tidak Patuh Total
Kepatuhan
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Residual
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Residual
1 kali sehari
>= 2 kali sehari
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Total
Regimen Terapi
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
85 15 38 32
2.6 -4.7 2.0
62.4% 80.0% 50.0% 68.8%
53 12 19 22
-2.6 4.7 -2.0
37.6% 20.0% 50.0% 31.2%
32 3 19 10
Crosstab
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided) df Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
85
.852 1 .035
.076 2 5.152
.081 2 5.018
a
Chi-Square Tests
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
5,65.
Approx. Sig. Value
Contingency Coefficient Nominal by Nominal
.081 .236
Symmetric Measures
Page 16
Approx. Sig. Value
N of Valid Cases
85
Symmetric Measures

EfekSampingObat*Kepatuhan
Sangat Patuh Patuh Tidak Patuh Total
Kepatuhan
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Residual
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Residual
Tidak Ada
Ada
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Total
Efek Samping Obat
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
85 15 38 32
-1.0 -1.6 2.6
20.0% 13.3% 15.8% 28.1%
17 2 6 9
1.0 1.6 -2.6
80.0% 86.7% 84.2% 71.9%
68 13 32 23
Crosstab
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided) df Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
85
.175 1 1.836
.347 2 2.116
.340 2 2.158
a
Chi-Square Tests
a. 1 cells (16,7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is 3,00.
Approx. Sig. Value
Contingency Coefficient
N of Valid Cases
Nominal by Nominal
85
.340 .157
Symmetric Measures

Pengetahuan*Kepatuhan
Page 17
Sangat Patuh Patuh Tidak Patuh Total
Kepatuhan
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Residual
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Residual
Rendah
Tinggi
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Total
Pengetahuan
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
85 15 38 32
5.5 12.9 -18.3
63.5% 100.0% 97.4% 6.2%
54 15 37 2
-5.5 -12.9 18.3
36.5% .0% 2.6% 93.8%
31 0 1 30
Crosstab
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided) df Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
85
.000 1 55.413
.000 2 87.322
.000 2 72.705
a
Chi-Square Tests
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
5,47.
Approx. Sig. Value
Contingency Coefficient
N of Valid Cases
Nominal by Nominal
85
.000 .679
Symmetric Measures

DukunganKeluarga*Kepatuhan
Sangat Patuh Patuh Tidak Patuh Total
Kepatuhan
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Residual
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Residual
Tidak ada dukungan
Ada dukungan
Dukungan Keluarga
4.1 13.0 -17.1
65.9% 93.3% 100.0% 12.5%
56 14 38 4
-4.1 -13.0 17.1
34.1% 6.7% .0% 87.5%
29 1 0 28
Crosstab
Page 18
Sangat Patuh Patuh Tidak Patuh Total
Kepatuhan
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Total
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
85 15 38 32
Crosstab
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided) df Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
85
.000 1 45.321
.000 2 77.647
.000 2 65.277
a
Chi-Square Tests
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
5,12.
Approx. Sig. Value
Contingency Coefficient
N of Valid Cases
Nominal by Nominal
85
.000 .659
Symmetric Measures

hasil*Kepatuhan
Sangat Patuh Patuh Tidak Patuh Total
Kepatuhan
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Residual
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Residual
Rendah
Tinggi
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Total
hasil
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
85 15 38 32
-4.6 3.8 .8
50.6% 20.0% 60.5% 53.1%
43 3 23 17
4.6 -3.8 -.8
49.4% 80.0% 39.5% 46.9%
42 12 15 15
Crosstab
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided) df Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
.022 2 7.593
.027 2 7.198
a
Chi-Square Tests
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
7,41.
Page 19
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided) df Value
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
85
.104 1 2.644
Chi-Square Tests
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
7,41.
Approx. Sig. Value
Contingency Coefficient
N of Valid Cases
Nominal by Nominal
85
.027 .279
Symmetric Measures

usia*Kepatuhan
Sangat Patuh Patuh Tidak Patuh Total
Kepatuhan
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Residual
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Residual
Awal
Akhir
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Total
usia
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
85 15 38 32
.4 -3.8 3.4
70.6% 73.3% 60.5% 81.2%
60 11 23 26
-.4 3.8 -3.4
29.4% 26.7% 39.5% 18.8%
25 4 15 6
Crosstab
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided) df Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
85
.322 1 .983
.156 2 3.721
.160 2 3.660
a
Chi-Square Tests
a. 1 cells (16,7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is 4,41.
Approx. Sig. Value
Contingency Coefficient Nominal by Nominal
.160 .203
Symmetric Measures
Page 20
Approx. Sig. Value
N of Valid Cases
85
Symmetric Measures

penghasilan*Kepatuhan
Sangat Patuh Patuh Tidak Patuh Total
Kepatuhan
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Residual
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Residual
Rendah
Tinggi
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Total
penghasilan
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
85 15 38 32
-1.4 4.5 -3.2
22.4% 13.3% 34.2% 12.5%
19 2 13 4
1.4 -4.5 3.2
77.6% 86.7% 65.8% 87.5%
66 13 25 28
Crosstab
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided) df Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
85
.515 1 .423
.061 2 5.610
.062 2 5.571
a
Chi-Square Tests
a. 1 cells (16,7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is 3,35.
Approx. Sig. Value
Contingency Coefficient
N of Valid Cases
Nominal by Nominal
85
.062 .248
Symmetric Measures

LamaMenderitaDM*Kepatuhan
Page 21
Sangat Patuh Patuh Tidak Patuh Total
Kepatuhan
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Residual
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Residual
Baru
Lama
Count
% within Kepatuhan
Total
Lama Menderita DM
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
85 15 38 32
1.1 1.6 -2.7
45.9% 53.3% 50.0% 37.5%
39 8 19 12
-1.1 -1.6 2.7
54.1% 46.7% 50.0% 62.5%
46 7 19 20
Crosstab
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided) df Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
85
.251 1 1.318
.470 2 1.511
.472 2 1.500
a
Chi-Square Tests
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
6,88.
Approx. Sig. Value
Contingency Coefficient
N of Valid Cases
Nominal by Nominal
85
.472 .132
Symmetric Measures
Page 22

You might also like