Footfall Verification Example

VERIFICATION EXAMPLE 1
- Footbridge Footfall Analysis

REFERENCE:
Example taken from A Design Guide for Footfall Induced Vibration of Structures, M.R.Wilford, P.Young,
The Concrete Society 2006, page 42.
SPECIFICATION:
In this problem will be analysed a concrete footbridge, having constant cross-section and two
continuous equal spans of 20 m, as shown in the figure below.
Assumed cross-section properties:
Material:
area Ax=0.77 m2
second moment of inertia Iy=0.056m4
mass per unit length m=1848kg/m
E= 38 GPa, density = 2400 kg/m3
RSA Calculation Model

The 2-D beam members, each divided into 8 finite elements.
Pinned supports.
SOLUTION:
Definition of the Footfall Analysis case in RSA 2010.
Generally there are two excitation methods:
- Self excitation analyzes the response in the same node to which the force is applied,
- Full excitation analyzes the response in any node, to the effect of the force applied to another
node.
All the parameters are set by default for
Concrete Center excitation force
method:
-
Walking frequency range from 1 to

2.8 Hz.
Number of footsteps a parameter

that is important only for the
resonant
response
(harmonic)
analysis; a lower number of
footsteps reduces a possibility of
resonance
Walkers weight - a parameter that
is important only for the resonant
response (harmonic) analysis; for
the transient analysis, the excitation
force is an impulse from the force of
746 N
Damping is assumed as 1.5% of critical,

so define 0.015 as constant damping for
all modes.
Press Modal analysis parameters button in the main

definition dialog window.
Footfall analysis solves modal eigenvalue problem
first and this dialog box is for settings the modal
analysis parameters.
The number of calculated eigenmodes is limited to
the frequency limit defined for FootFall analysis.
For this example change the Frequency limit to 20
Hz, in order to obtain the first three modes.
By default, the active mass direction is Z only, for vertical vibrations.
Like for normal Modal analysis case, the Footfall analysis case can ignore the self-mass of the model
elements, when Ignore density is checked. User can also convert any static load case to masses.
Footfall analysis generates lumped with rotation mass matrix and is solved with subspace iteration
algorithm.
Close the windows by pressing OK buttons.
Run calculations.
A. Modal analysis natural frequencies

Open results table from menu Results\Advanced\Modal analysis.
Mode
Theoretical (Hz)
f1
4,22
f2
6,59
f3
16,90
Good agreement of results.
RSA 2010 (Hz)

4,212
6,579
16,814
The response factor for Footfall analysis is calculated using 2 different types of analysis:
resonant response, which occurs for low frequency structures the walking excitation can induce
harmonic resonant with the structure natural modes of vibration.
transient response , which occurs for high frequency structures harmonic resonant cannot occur,
so the footfall response is induced by a single dynamic impulse with the maximum frequency from
the walking frequency range.
The criterion of selecting an analysis type is the first, basic frequency of structure natural vibrations
and the maximum footfall frequency. It is assumed that the resonant response can be induced up to
fourth multiplication of the walking frequency. When the usual maximum walking frequency is about
2.5 Hz, then the limit for resonance possibility is about 10 Hz of the basic natural frequency.
As the sample structure basic natural mode is 4.21 Hz, then it is obvious that the resonant response
will have stronger influence than the transient response.
B. Footfall analysis
Results of the analysis include only results in nodes. One of the most important results of the
analysis is a Response factor (Rf) which specifies how many times calculated vibrations exceed the
vibration perceptible to a human.
Open results table from menu Results\Advanced\Footfall analysis- tables.
The table shows for each node the maximum Response factor in the frequency domain. There are
always calculated response factors for resonant and transient algorithm. Rf-overall is the greater
value from the resonant and transient response factors. Frequency column shows for which frequency
the overall response factor is obtained.
We can see that the maximum Response factor is obtained for nodes 7 and 14, which are actually in
the middle of the spans.
The maximum Response factor is obtained for walking frequency equal 2,11 Hz. More exactly it is
2,106 Hz which second harmonics (multiplication) gives the natural frequency 4.212. Hz of the second
mode.
The simple check according to the reference guide, for walking at 2.106 Hz (second harmonic), gives:
Dynamic force Fh = 686 [N] * (0.069+0.0056*2*2.106) = 63.5 N
(refer table 4.3)
Resonant acceleration for mode 2 of modal mass 33322 kg, at node 7 with normalized eigenvector
0,97 value, is given by:
a = 63.5*0.97*0.97 / (2*0.015*33322) = 0.0598 m/s2
(see 4.1)
Response factor
Rf = 0.0598 / 0.0071 = 8,42
(see 4.7)
This gives good agreement with exact FEM solution.
For further analysis we can examine detailed diagrams of Footfall analysis results. Open dialog
box from menu Results\Advanced\Footfall analysis- diagram.

Footfall analysis diagrams display values of
different results in walking frequency domain.
This is particularly interested for resonant
analysis results.
For Transient analysis diagrams the maximum

values will be always obtained for the end of
walking frequency range.
Interesting can be diagram of Velocity in Time
domain after impulse load.
Lets examine diagram of Resonant response

factor in Frequency domain for node 7 excited
with the load at node 7.
The diagrams can be plotted for any selection of
resultant and excitation nodes, even if the
analysis was performed with self-excitation
method. The plots are calculated on-line.
The diagram shows the response factor due to each harmonics and the total, Overall Response factor.
It is shown that the maximum response factor is obtained at walking frequency 2.11 Hz, mainly by the
second harmonics.
BS 5400 provides guidance on the acceptable levels for footbridges. For external bridges the
response factor should be R<64 for single person excitation at most critical footfall rate. Thus the
footbridge vibration are satisfactory according to the code.

Footfall Verification Example

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Footfall Verification Example

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Footfall Verification Example

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

How was the footbridge modeled and analyzed?

What are the natural frequencies of the footbridge?

VERIFICATION EXAMPLE 1

- Footbridge Footfall Analysis

Assumed cross-section properties:

E= 38 GPa, density = 2400 kg/m3

RSA Calculation Model

Walking frequency range from 1 to

Number of footsteps a parameter

Damping is assumed as 1.5% of critical,

Press Modal analysis parameters button in the main

A. Modal analysis natural frequencies

RSA 2010 (Hz)

(refer table 4.3)

This gives good agreement with exact FEM solution.

box from menu Results\Advanced\Footfall analysis- diagram.

For Transient analysis diagrams the maximum

Lets examine diagram of Resonant response

You might also like