Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 1K views

    Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor

    Uploaded by

    crlstinaaa
    The Supreme Court held that a class action involving potentially millions of people exposed to asbestos could not be certified. It found that the class failed to meet the requirements that common issues predominate over individual ones and that the named parties could adequately represent the interests of the entire class. The broad class encompassed people with diverse medical conditions and circumstances, making adequate representation impossible. The Court determined this was a legislative problem, not one well-suited to judicial resolution, suggesting Congress would be better able to address a comprehensive settlement for asbestos claims.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as TXT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor

    Uploaded by

    crlstinaaa
    1K views2 pages
    The Supreme Court held that a class action involving potentially millions of people exposed to asbestos could not be certified. It found that the class failed to meet the requirements that common issues predominate over individual ones and that the named parties could adequately represent the interests of the entire class. The broad class encompassed people with diverse medical conditions and circumstances, making adequate representation impossible. The Court determined this was a legislative problem, not one well-suited to judicial resolution, suggesting Congress would be better able to address a comprehensive settlement for asbestos claims.

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    TXT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The Supreme Court held that a class action involving potentially millions of people exposed to asbestos could not be certified. It found that the class failed to meet the requirements that common issues predominate over individual ones and that the named parties could adequately represent the interests of the entire class. The broad class encompassed people with diverse medical conditions and circumstances, making adequate representation impossible. The Court determined this was a legislative problem, not one well-suited to judicial resolution, suggesting Congress would be better able to address a comprehensive settlement for asbestos claims.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as TXT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as txt, pdf, or txt
    1K views2 pages

    Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor

    Uploaded by

    crlstinaaa
    The Supreme Court held that a class action involving potentially millions of people exposed to asbestos could not be certified. It found that the class failed to meet the requirements that common issues predominate over individual ones and that the named parties could adequately represent the interests of the entire class. The broad class encompassed people with diverse medical conditions and circumstances, making adequate representation impossible. The Court determined this was a legislative problem, not one well-suited to judicial resolution, suggesting Congress would be better able to address a comprehensive settlement for asbestos claims.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as TXT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as txt, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 2

    Case: Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor (1997, US) [CB.

    822-832]

    Facts: This case concerned a certification of a class action lawsuit to achieve


    a global settlement of current and future asbestos-related claims. The class
    potentially encompasses hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions, of individuals
    tied together by this commonality: each was, or some day may be, adversely
    affected by past exposure to asbestos products manufactured by one or more of 20
    companies (the petitioners).

    Issue: Whether such a broad class can be certified as a class action. No.

    Holding: class action cannot be certified.

    Reasoning: The Court held that the class failed to satisfy the predominance
    standard and that the class approved by the district court failed to satisfy the
    requirement that the named parties would fairly and adequately protect the
    interests of the class.
    ○ Requirement of Common issue predominance: Rule 23(b)(3) - common questions
    of law or fact … predominate over any questions affecting only individual members
    § Lower court said the benefits asbestos-exposed persons might gain
    from the class action compensation, but this legislative issue not important here
    for the judicial findings of pertinence. Instead you have to meet the reqs of
    23(b)(3)
    § Reqs of 23(b)(3) not met because so many diff facts surrounding the
    individual class member; too broad
    ○ Requirement of Adequacy of Representation: Rule 23(a)(4) - requires that
    named parties "will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class"
    § Not met b/c diff medical conditions don’t represent all subclasses;
    too broad
    □ Interests of those within a single class not met
    § No assurance for fair and adequate representation for the diverse
    groups and individuals affected
    § No assurance that the named plaintiffs operated under a proper
    understanding of the representational responsibilities.
    ○ The global-settlement scheme should be addressed by Congress
    (legislature), not the courts (judicial)

    • Amchem Products v Windsor (1997, US) [Yeazell 822-832]


    ○ Here; legislative, not judicial problem, so circuit court reversed lower
    court's decision
    ○ Decision that class action should not be upheld
    • Lots of ppl sued lots of companies for injuries caused by asbestos
    ○ Lawyers break the matter into 2 litigations
    § Litigation #1 - settle $200million - pay all injured clients pursuant
    to a settlement agreement
    □ Contingent on district court certifying the class action in #2,
    and
    § Litigation #2 - all ppl who haven't filed suit, but may in the future
    do so - settle this one too
    □ To achieve a global settlement of all potential claims.
    ○ Problem here:
    § Conflict of interest of the lawyers
    § Ppl who haven't filed suit will never be able to do this
    ○ Benefit of class action:
    § Efficiency
    ○ Why does the court say class action not certified?
    § Common issues do not predominate
    § Rule 23(a)(4) - that the named parties will not fairly and adequately
    protect the interests of the class.
    □ It's not that the named parties aren't typical, they are. The
    problem is that the class itself is so riven by conflict that these ppl cannot
    possibly adequately meet the interests of the class.
    • Due process problem - if we are going to take away the claim of ppl unknown, we
    better make sure they are adequately represented
    • Problem wont be solved through litigation. Why?
    ○ After lawsuit, you will have to
    • The courts and litigations are one mechanism by which the country is governed,
    but not the only

    You might also like