The document summarizes the methodology of Freedom House's annual Freedom in the World survey, which evaluates freedom in 194 countries and territories. The survey measures political rights and civil liberties to rate countries on a scale from 1 (most free) to 7 (least free). Countries are categorized as Free, Partly Free, or Not Free. The survey applies universal human rights standards to make impartial assessments, rather than cultural considerations. It examines both state and nonstate actors' influences on individual freedoms. Country ratings and reports are determined through expert analysis and used to track global trends in freedom over time and across different political systems.
The document summarizes the methodology of Freedom House's annual Freedom in the World survey, which evaluates freedom in 194 countries and territories. The survey measures political rights and civil liberties to rate countries on a scale from 1 (most free) to 7 (least free). Countries are categorized as Free, Partly Free, or Not Free. The survey applies universal human rights standards to make impartial assessments, rather than cultural considerations. It examines both state and nonstate actors' influences on individual freedoms. Country ratings and reports are determined through expert analysis and used to track global trends in freedom over time and across different political systems.
The document summarizes the methodology of Freedom House's annual Freedom in the World survey, which evaluates freedom in 194 countries and territories. The survey measures political rights and civil liberties to rate countries on a scale from 1 (most free) to 7 (least free). Countries are categorized as Free, Partly Free, or Not Free. The survey applies universal human rights standards to make impartial assessments, rather than cultural considerations. It examines both state and nonstate actors' influences on individual freedoms. Country ratings and reports are determined through expert analysis and used to track global trends in freedom over time and across different political systems.
The document summarizes the methodology of Freedom House's annual Freedom in the World survey, which evaluates freedom in 194 countries and territories. The survey measures political rights and civil liberties to rate countries on a scale from 1 (most free) to 7 (least free). Countries are categorized as Free, Partly Free, or Not Free. The survey applies universal human rights standards to make impartial assessments, rather than cultural considerations. It examines both state and nonstate actors' influences on individual freedoms. Country ratings and reports are determined through expert analysis and used to track global trends in freedom over time and across different political systems.
FREEDOM IN THE WORLD 2010: EROSION OF FREEDOM INTENSIFIES
Freedom in the World Methodology Summary
The Freedom in the World survey provides an annual evaluation of the progress and decline of freedom in 194 countries and 14 select related and disputed territories. The survey measures freedom according to two broad categories: political rights and civil liberties. Each country and territory is rated on a seven-point scale for both political rights and civil liberties, with 1 representing the most free and 7 the least free, and then assigns each country and territory a broad category status of Free (for countries whose ratings average 1.0 to 2.5), Partly Free (3.0 to 5.0), or Not Free (5.5 to 7.0). Freedom House also assigns upward or downward trend arrows to certain countries and territories which saw general positive or negative trends during the year that were not significant enough to result in a ratings change from the previous year. In addition, the survey includes detailed narrative reports on each country and territory describing the major political and human rights developments of the year. Freedom House does not maintain a culture-bound view of freedom. The methodology of the survey is grounded in basic standards of political rights and civil liberties, derived in large measure from relevant portions of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. These standards apply to all countries and territories, irrespective of geographical location, ethnic or religious composition, or level of economic development. The survey operates from the assumption that freedom for all peoples is best achieved in liberal democratic societies. The survey does not rate governments or government performance per se, but rather the realworld rights and social freedoms enjoyed by individuals. Freedoms can be affected by state actions, as well as by nonstate actors, including insurgents and other armed groups. Thus, the survey ratings generally reflect the interplay of a variety of actors, both governmental and nongovernmental. The survey findings are reached after a multilayered process of analysis and evaluation by a team of in-house and consultant regional experts and scholars. The survey, which has been published since 1972, enables an examination of trends in freedom over time and on a comparative basis across regions with different political and economic systems. Freedom in the Worlds ratings and narrative reports are used by policymakers, leading scholars, the media, and international organizations in monitoring the ebb and flow of freedom worldwide. For a more detailed analysis of last years survey methodology, please consult the methodology chapter from Freedom in the World 2009. The methodology for the forthcoming survey edition will be published in Freedom in the World 2010.
Global Politics: Exploring Diverse Systems and Ideologies: Understanding Political Systems, Ideologies, and Global Actors: Global Perspectives: Exploring World Politics, #1