Elastomeric Bearing Design Example
Elastomeric Bearing Design Example
Elastomeric Bearing Design Example
Characteristics (S14.6.2)
The bearing chosen for a particular application has to have appropriate load and
movement capabilities. Table S14.6.2-1 may be used as a guide when comparing
different bearing systems.
6-1
Elastomers are flexible under shear and uniaxial deformation, but they are very stiff
against volume changes. This feature makes the design of a bearing that is stiff in
compression but flexible in shear possible. Under uniaxial compression, the flexible
elastomer would shorten significantly and, to maintain constant volume, sustain large
increases in its plan dimension, but the stiff steel layers of the steel reinforced
elastomeric bearings restrain the lateral expansion.
Elastomers stiffen at low temperatures. The low temperature stiffening effect is very
sensitive to the elastomer compound, and the increase in shear resistance can be
controlled by selection of an elasotmer compound which is appropriate for the climatic
conditions.
The design of a steel reinforced elastomeric bearing requires an appropriate balance of
compressive, shear and rotational stiffnesses. The shape factor, taken as the plan area
divided by the area of the perimeter free to bulge, affects the compressive and rotational
stiffnesses, but it has no impact on the translational stiffness or deformation capacity.
The bearing must be designed to control the stress in the steel reinforcement and the
strain in the elastomer. This is done by controlling the elastomer layer thickness and the
shape factor of the bearing. Fatigue, stability, delamination, yield and rupture of the
steel reinforcement, stiffness of the elastomer, and geometric constraints must all be
satisfied.
Design methods
Two design methods are allowed by the AASHTO-LRFD Specifications.
Method A,
specified in S14.7.6, is applicable to plain, steel reinforced and fiber glass reinforced
elastomeric pads as well as cotton duck pads. Method B, specified in S14.7.5, is
applicable to steel reinforced elastomeric bearings. The following sections and the
design example below are based on Method B. Flowcharts for the bearing design using
both Method A and Method B are included in Section 3.
6-2
Elastomer grade is selected based on the temperature zone of the bridge location and by
Table S14.7.5.2-2. The temperature zones are shown in Figure 6-1.
A
0
B
-20
C
-30
D
-45
E
< -45
14
NA
NA
According to S14.7.5.2, any of the three design options listed below may be used to
specify the elastomer:
1) Specify the elastomer with the minimum low-temperature grade indicated in
Table S14.7.5.2-2 and determine the shear force transmitted by the bearing as
specified in S14.6.3.1;
2) Specify the elastomer with the minimum low-temperature grade for use when
special force provisions are incorporated in the design but do not provide a low
friction sliding surface, in which case the bridge shall be designed to withstand
twice the design shear force specified in S14.6.3.1; or
6-3
3) Specify the elastomer with the minimum low-temperature grade for use when
special force provisions are incorporated in the design but do not provide a low
friction sliding surface, in which case the components of the bridge shall be
designed to resist four times the design shear force as specified in S14.6.3.1.
Design Step Design a steel reinforced elastomeric bearing for the interior girde rs at the
6.1 intermediate pier
A typical elastomer with hardness 60 Shore A Durometer and a shear modulus of 150 psi
is assumed. The 1.75 ksi delamination stress limit of Eq. S14.7.5.3.2-3 requires a total
plan area at least equal to the vertical reaction on the bearing divided by 1.75. The
bearing reaction at different limit states is equal to the shear at the end of Span 1 as
shown in Tables 5.3-3 and -4. These values are shown in Table 6-1 below.
Table 6-1 Design Forces on Bearings of Interior Girders at the Intermediate Pier
Max. factored reaction
(k)
433.0
290.5
1.75(129.9)
129.9
Strength I
Service I
Notice that:
The loads shown above include the dynamic load allowance. According to the
commentary of S14.7.5.3.2, the effect of the dynamic load allowance on the
elastomeric bearing reaction may be ignored. The reason for this is that the
dynamic load allowance effects are likely to be only a small proportion of the
total load and because the stress limits are based on fatigue damage, whose
limits are not clearly defined. For this example, the dynamic load allowance
(33% of the girder maximum response due to the truck) adds 21.64 and 37.88
kips to the girder factored end shear at the Service I and Strength I limit states,
respectively. This is a relatively small force, therefore, the inclusion of the
dynamic load allowance effect leads to a slightly more conservative design.
The live load reaction per bearing is taken equal to the maximum girder live load
end shear. Recognizing that the girder, which is continuous for live load, has two
bearings on the intermediate pier, another acceptable procedure is to divide the
maximum live load reaction on the pier equally between the two bearings. This
will result in lower bearing loads compared to using the girder end shear to
design the bearings. This approach was not taken in this example, rather, the
girder end shear was applied to the bearing.
6-4
(S14.7.5.3.2-3)
L 1.00GS
(S14.7.5.3.2-4)
where:
s
L
G
S
To satisfy the 1.75 ksi limit, the minimum bearing area, Areq, should satisfy:
Areq
The corners of the bottom flanges of the girder are usually chamfered. The bearing
should be slightly narrower than the flat part of the flange unless a stiff sole plate is used
to insure uniform distribution of the compressive stress and strain over the bearing area.
The bearing should be as short along the length of the girder as practical to permit
rotation about the transverse axis. This requires the bearing to be as wide as possible
which is desirable when stabilizing the girder during erection. For a first estimate,
choose a 24 in. width [28 in. wide girder bottom flange 2(1 in. chamfer + 1 in. edge
clearance)] and a 7.5 in. longitudinal dimension to ensure that the maximum compressive
stress limit is satisfied (area = 24(7.5) = 180 in2 > 166 in2 required OK). The
longitudinal translation is 0 in. for a fixed bearing. Notice that for a bearing subject to
translation, i.e., movable bearing, the shear strains due to translation must be less than
0.5 in./in. to prevent rollover and excess fatigue damage. This means that the total
elastomer thickness, hrt , must be greater than two times the design translation, s, where
applicable. A preliminary shape factor should be calculated according to S14.7.5.1.
6-5
The shape factor of a layer of an elastomeric bearing, Si, is taken as the plan area of the
layer divided by the area of perimeter free to bulge. For rectangular bearings without
holes, the shape factor of the layer may be taken as:
Si = LW/[2hri(L + W)]
(S14.7.5.1-1)
where:
L = length of a rectangular elastomeric bearing (parallel to the
longitudinal bridge axis) (in.)
W = width of the bearing in the transverse direction (in.)
hri = thickness of ith elastomeric layer in elastomeric bearing (in.)
Determine the thickness of the th
i elastomeric layer by rewriting Eq. S14.7.5.1-1 and
solving for hri due to the total load.
hri = LW/[2Si(L + W)]
Design Step Design Requirements (S14.7.5.3)
6.1.2.1
Compressive stress (S14.7.5.3.2):
In any elastomeric bearing layer, the average compressive stress at the service limit state
will satisfy the following provisions.
These provisions limit the shear stress and strain in the elastomer. The relationship
between the shear stress and the applied compressive load depends directly on the shape
factor, with higher shape factors leading to higher capacities.
First, solve for the shape factor under total load, ST L, by rewriting Eq. S14.7.5.3.2-3 for
bearings fixed against shear deformation.
ST L s /2.00G
(S14.7.5.3.2-3)
where:
s = PT L/Areq
PT L = maximum bearing reaction under total load (k)
= 290.5 k
s = 290.5/[7.5(24)]
= 1.614 ksi
G = 0.150 ksi
ST L 1.614/[2.00(0.150)]
5.38
(1)
6-6
Solve for the shape factor under live load, SLL, by rewriting Eq. S14.7.5.3.2-4 for
bearings fixed against shear deformation.
SLL L/1.00G
where:
(S14.7.5.3.2-4)
L = PLL/Areq
PLL = maximum bearing live load reaction (k)
= 129.9 k
L = 129.9/[7.5(24)]
= 0.722 ksi
SLL 0.722/[1.00(0.150)]
4.81
(2)
From (1) and (2), the minimum shape factor of any layer is 5.38.
Notice that if holes are present in the elastomeric bearing their effect needs to be
accounted for when calculating the shape factor because they reduce the loaded area and
increase the area free to bulge. Use Eq. SC14.7.5.1-1 in this case instead of Eq.
S14.7.5.1-1.
Using the shape factors of ST L and SLL calculated above, determine the elastomer
thickness.
hri(TL) < (LW)/[2(ST L)(L + W)]
< 7.5(24)/[2(5.38)(7.5 + 24)]
< 0.531 in.
and
hri(LL) < (LW)/[2(SLL)(L + W)]
< 7.5(24)/[2(4.81)(7.5 + 24)]
< 0.594 in.
Use an interior elastomer layer thickness of hri = 0.5 in.
The shape factor is:
S = (LW)/[2(hri)(L + W)]
= 7.5(24)/[2(0.5)(7.5 + 24)]
= 5.71
6-7
= ihri
(S14.7.5.3.3-1)
where:
i = instantaneous compressive strain in ith elastomer layer of a
laminated bearing
hri = thickness of ith elastomeric layer in a laminated bearing (in.)
Values for i are determined from test results or by analysis when considering long-term
deflections. The effects of creep of the elastomer are added to the instantaneous
deflection. Creep effects should be determined from information relevant to the
elastomeric compound used. In the absence of material-specific data, the values given in
S14.7.5.2 may be used.
Design Step Shear deformation (S14.7.5.3.4)
6.1.2.3
This provision need only be checked if the bearing is a movable bearing. Since the
bearing under consideration is a fixed bearing, this provision does not apply.
Commentary on this provision is provided below, but no design checks are performed.
The maximum horizontal movement of the bridge superstructure, o , is taken as the
extreme displacement caused by creep, shrinkage, and posttensioning combined with
thermal movements.
The maximum shear deformation of the bearing at the service limit state, s, is taken as
o , modified to account for the substructure stiffness and construction procedures. If a
low friction sliding surface is installed, s need not be taken to be larger than the
deformation corresponding to first slip.
The bearing is required to satisfy:
hrt 2s
(S14.7.5.3.4-1)
where:
hrt = total elastomer thickness (sum of the thicknesses of all elastomer
layers) (in.)
6-8
(S14.7.5.3.5-1)
where:
n
6-9
(S14.7.5.3.5-3)
Rewrite Eq. S14.7.5.3.5-3 to determine the number of interior layers of elastomer, nc,
required to limit compression along the edges.
nc > -0.167(s)(B/hri)2 /[s/2.25GS 1]
> -0.167(0.005944)(7.5/0.5)2 /[1.614/[2.25(0.150)(5.71)] 1]
> 1.37
Use 2 interior layers 0.5 in. thick each. Use exterior layers 0.25 in. thick each (< 70% of
the thickness of the interior layer).
Design Step Stability of elastomeric bearings (S14.7.5.3.6)
6.1.2.5
Bearings are investigated for instability at the service limit state load combinations
specified in Table S3.4.1-1.
Bearings satisfying Eq. S14.7.5.3.6-1 are considered stable, and no further investigation
of stability is required.
2A B
(S14.7.5.3.6-1)
for which:
1.92
A =
B =
h rt
L
2.0L
1+
W
2.67
(S + 2.0)1+ L
4.0W
(S14.7.5.3.6-2)
(S14.7.5.3.6-3)
6-10
where:
L = 7.5 in.
W = 24 in.
hrt = total thickness of the elastomer in the bearing (in.)
= 2(0.25) + 2(0.5)
= 1.5 in.
For a rectangular bearing where L is greater than W, stability will be investigated by
interchanging L and W in Eqs. S14.7.5.3.6-2 and -3.
A =
1 .5
1.92
7.5
2.0(7 .5 )
1+
24
= 0.301
B =
2.67
(5.71 + 2.0 )1 + 7 .5
4.0(24 )
= 0.321
Check 2A B
2(0.301) = 0.602 > 0.321, therefore, the bearing is not stable and
Eqs. S14.7.5.3.6-4 and -5 need to be checked.
For bridge decks fixed against translation, the following equation needs to be satisfied to
ensure stability.
s GS/(A B)
(S14.7.5.3.6-5)
6-11
(S14.7.5.3.7-1)
where:
hmax = thickness of thickest elastomeric layer in elastomeric
bearing (in.)
= 0.5 in.
s
= 1.614 ksi
Fy
hs(TL) 3(0.5)(1.614)/36
0.067 in.
At the fatigue limit state:
hs 2.0hmaxL/FT H
(S14.7.5.3.7-2)
where:
hmax = 0.5 in.
L
= 129.9/[7.5(24)]
= 0.722 ksi
6-12
thickness accounts for both the material removed and the stress concentrations around
the hole.
The total height of the bearing, hrt :
= cover layers + elastomer layers + shim thicknesses
= 2(0.25) + 2(0.5) + 3(0.120)
= 1.86 in.
L = 7.5"
hrt
Direction of traffic
W = 24"
PLAN
1.86"
24"
ELEVATION
A shear key between the bent cap and the concrete diaphragm will provide the movement
restraint in the longitudinal direction. See Figure 6-3.
6-13
column
6-14