Doh - Pes Peer Rating

4
INSTRUCTIONS
1.
2.
3.
4.
This form is used for evaluating the performance of your peer

in this rating period. Please use pen or ballpen when
accomplishing this
Please observe fairness and objectivity when rating your peer.
In rating your peer, please encircle the box that most
objectively describes his/her attitude and behavior in the
performance of his/her functions. Where 10 is Outstanding, 8 is
Very Satisfactory, 6, is Satisfactory, 4 is Unsatisfactory, 2 is
Poor.
After accomplishing this form, please affix your signature and
submit
this
to
your
immediate
supervisor.
3.
Integrity - Peers adherence to the Code of Conduct & Ethical

Standards and values. Demonstrated ability in the adherence
to a code of moral conduct and values.
10
Always righteous, upright and can be trusted on any matter;

always straight, uncompromising and incorruptible in his daily
dealings.
Consistently sincere in his/her dealings with others; free from

fraud and deception.
Fair and just in dealing with self and others; since in purpose
and deed and unpretentious most of the time.
Insincere, not trustworthy in carrying out duties and

responsibilities; allows him to be used by others in situations,
which may lead to fraud and deception.
FACTORS TO BE RATED
10
Courtesy Peers behavior to be polite, kind manner of

speech and actuation and relations with your and other
publics.
Always goes all the way to make people comfortable
and satisfied even under pressure and occupied with
work; very effective in dealing with people.
Frequently goes out of the way even under pressure and

occupied with work; generally courteous and accommodating.
4.
Usually goes out of the way to assist the public; able to deal
with public and peer although need some advise at times.
10
Occasionally assist the public; at times discourteous;

shows lack of patience in dealing with people.
Oftentimes
complained
discourteous
due
to
and
irritable;
inconsiderate
regularly
attitude.
2.
Human Relations peers integrated concern for people at

work, office clientele, and supervisor-subordinate relationship
into work situations.
10
Very effective in dealing with public. Gets along easily with

other members of the workforce. Has cordial relationship
with subordinates and peers.
Can be relied upon to deal with the public, and is generally

courteous and accommodating.
Has the ability to deal pleasantly with the public, subordinates
and peers.
Resourceful in doing his own job more efficiently, effectively

and productively; takes own initiative, attentive to work;
usually overcomes extra ordinary problems.
Average attitude and interest in his work; performs accordingly

to his job descriptions and responsibilities fairly competent to
handle ordinary problems.
Hardly performs his job description and responsibilities; works

only after consistent prodding.
Stress Tolerance Peers demonstrated

performance under pressure or opposition.
ability
Compliance to office rules and regulations Peers

observance and adherence to existing office policies/rules.
10
Always complies to office rules and reminds others to observe

them
Generally complies to office rules with minimal

.reminders
Occasionally lax in observing office rules and regulations
Regularly reminded of existing office rules and regulation
Ignores and violates office rules and regulations
of
Always calm and shows pleasant disposition; consistently

confident and positive even during stressful conditions at work;
never loses patience and never allows tension and anxiety to
affect workplace (performance in workplace)
Most of the time calm, confident and positive; occasionally
loses emotional control during stressful conditions.
Normally calm, confident and positive; occasionally loses

emotional control during stressful conditions.
Often loses emotional control in dealing with stressful work

situations; often complains about people and situations at
work.
5.
Requires very close coordination; rarely meets deadlines, fails

to find ways out of any difficulties.
Dishonest in any transaction and dealing with others
2
8
Highly creative with new ideas and suggestions that result in

increased effectiveness, efficiency and productivity; has an
ideal outlook and concern to the work and can perfectly solve
problems own initiative, attentive to work, usually overcomes
extra ordinary problems.
6.
10
Has considerable difficulty in dealing with the public. Draws

negative reactions. Often discourteous and irritable.
==============================
1.
Has some difficulty in dealing with the public, occasionally

discourteous except when attending to important or influential
persons.
Cannot handle stress, highly emotional and into violent

arguments with others.
Initiative and Resourcefulness Peers demonstrated ability
to start action, project and performance assigned tasks.
7.
Punctuality and Attendance Peers observed behavior

of coming to office on time as to be present at work to
complete assigned responsibilities.
10
Always within the working area of place of work
Mostly within the working area or place of work
Often times within the working area or place of
Rarely within the working area or place of work
Always not within the working area or place of work
PEF 3
8.
10
Leadership Peers demonstrated ability to influence,

motivate and develop confidence to work as a team
and accomplish assigned task, leading the
organizational unit to achieve his/her goal and
objectives enthusiastically.
Leads subordinate effectively; often gets job done through

teamwork.
Leads subordinates adequately well; usually gets job done.
Seldom exercise leadership over subordinates; seldom gets job

done on time.
Cannot lead subordinates; no teamwork; productivity low; no

balance of task and people concerns.
Has superior ability in data analysis and always arrives at

excellent decisions even on complex problems.
Often make very good and sound decisions based on relevant

information and good data analysis.
Sept. 12 Dec. 31, 2011

________________________________
RATING PERIOD
GLADYS D. BULADACO
_________________________________
NAME OF THE PEER TO BE RATED
Judgment/decision making Peers demonstrated ability to

analyze data, identify issues and problems, make conclusions
based on factual information.
10
FHSIS Data Processor/Encoder

_________________________________
POSITION
_________________________________
NAME AND SIGNATUE OF RATER
Analysis of data and problems normally adequate. Generally

arrives at correct decisions on routine concerns.
Sometimes make bad decisions because of inadequate.

Generally arrives at correct decisions on routine analysis.
Decisions made are often bad because of poor analysis and

judgment; usually refuses to make decision.
DOH- PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM

(DOH-PES)
PEER RATER FORM
Leads subordinates exceptionally well; easily achieves high

productivity through teamwork; maintains a good balance of
task and people concern.
9.
COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS:
_________________________________________
POSITION
_____________________________________
OFFICE/DIVISION
ARD/ Statistics/ FHSIS Unit

CHD- Caraga
_________________________________
OFFICE
PLEASE READ THE INSTRUCTIONS CAREFULLY

BEFORE ACCOMPLISHING THIS FORM
_____________________________
DATE
Note: Factors No. 7 and 8 for Supervisors only

Doh - Pes Peer Rating

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Doh - Pes Peer Rating

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Doh - Pes Peer Rating

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

4

This form is used for evaluating the performance of your peer

Integrity - Peers adherence to the Code of Conduct & Ethical

Always righteous, upright and can be trusted on any matter;

Consistently sincere in his/her dealings with others; free from

Insincere, not trustworthy in carrying out duties and

Courtesy Peers behavior to be polite, kind manner of

Frequently goes out of the way even under pressure and

Occasionally assist the public; at times discourteous;

Human Relations peers integrated concern for people at

Very effective in dealing with public. Gets along easily with

Can be relied upon to deal with the public, and is generally

Resourceful in doing his own job more efficiently, effectively

Average attitude and interest in his work; performs accordingly

Hardly performs his job description and responsibilities; works

Stress Tolerance Peers demonstrated

Compliance to office rules and regulations Peers

Always complies to office rules and reminds others to observe

Generally complies to office rules with minimal

Occasionally lax in observing office rules and regulations

Regularly reminded of existing office rules and regulation

Ignores and violates office rules and regulations

Always calm and shows pleasant disposition; consistently

Normally calm, confident and positive; occasionally loses

Often loses emotional control in dealing with stressful work

Requires very close coordination; rarely meets deadlines, fails

Dishonest in any transaction and dealing with others

Highly creative with new ideas and suggestions that result in

Has considerable difficulty in dealing with the public. Draws

Has some difficulty in dealing with the public, occasionally

Cannot handle stress, highly emotional and into violent

Punctuality and Attendance Peers observed behavior

Always within the working area of place of work

Mostly within the working area or place of work

Often times within the working area or place of

Rarely within the working area or place of work

Always not within the working area or place of work

Leadership Peers demonstrated ability to influence,

Leads subordinate effectively; often gets job done through

Leads subordinates adequately well; usually gets job done.

Seldom exercise leadership over subordinates; seldom gets job

Cannot lead subordinates; no teamwork; productivity low; no

Has superior ability in data analysis and always arrives at

Often make very good and sound decisions based on relevant

Sept. 12 Dec. 31, 2011

Judgment/decision making Peers demonstrated ability to

FHSIS Data Processor/Encoder

Analysis of data and problems normally adequate. Generally

Sometimes make bad decisions because of inadequate.

Decisions made are often bad because of poor analysis and

DOH- PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM

Leads subordinates exceptionally well; easily achieves high

COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS:

ARD/ Statistics/ FHSIS Unit

PLEASE READ THE INSTRUCTIONS CAREFULLY

Note: Factors No. 7 and 8 for Supervisors only

You might also like