Pre-Service Performance Assessment For Practicum/Practicum Equivalent Professional Standards For Teachers: See 603 CMR 7.08
Pre-Service Performance Assessment For Practicum/Practicum Equivalent Professional Standards For Teachers: See 603 CMR 7.08
Pre-Service Performance Assessment For Practicum/Practicum Equivalent Professional Standards For Teachers: See 603 CMR 7.08
Evidence
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Rating:
Rating Scale: 1=Does Not Meet the Standard; 2=Meets the Standard, 3=Exceeds the Standard; NA=Not Applicable.
Candidates Name:
License:
Date:
Date:
Evidence
b.
c.
d.
b.
Employs a variety of content-based and contentoriented teaching techniques from more teacherdirected strategies such as direct instruction, practice,
and Socratic dialogue, to less teacher-directed
approaches such as discussion, problem solving,
cooperative learning, and research projects (among
others).
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.
b.
c.
b.
Rating:
Rating Scale: 1=Does Not Meet the Standard; 2=Meets the Standard, 3=Exceeds the Standard; NA=Not Applicable.
Candidates Name:
License:
Date:
Date:
Evidence
1.
2.
3.
4.
10
Rating:
Rating Scale: 1=Does Not Meet the Standard; 2=Meets the Standard, 3=Exceeds the Standard; NA=Not Applicable.
Candidates Name:
License:
Date:
Date:
Evidence
1.
2.
3.
11
4.
5.
Rating:
Rating Scale: 1=Does Not Meet the Standard; 2=Meets the Standard, 3=Exceeds the Standard; 4=NA/Not Applicable.
Candidates Name:
License:
Date:
Date:
Evidence
12
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
13
7.
Rating:
Rating Scale: 1=Does Not Meet the Standard; 2=Meets the Standard, 3=Exceeds the Standard; NA=Not Applicable.
Candidates Name:
License:
Date:
Date:
14
MEPID:
Date:
Date:
or License #:
Standard
Standard A- Plans Curriculum and Instruction
Standard B- Delivers Effective Instruction
Standard C- Manages Classroom Climate and Operation
Standard D- Promotes Equity
Standard E- Meets Professional Responsibilities
Rating
Rating Scale: 1=Does Not Meet the Standard; 2=Meets the Standard, 3=Exceeds the Standard; NA=Not Applicable.
Summary Assessment of Performance (include phrases that could be used in a letter of recommendation):
Areas of strength:
15
Evidence Not
Found
Candidates Name:
License:
Date:
Date:
16