ROI Case Study - Kimberly Clark
ROI Case Study - Kimberly Clark
ROI Case Study - Kimberly Clark
Document
L117
THE COMPANY
Kimberly-Clark is a global company incorporated in 1928, focused on leading the
world in essentials for a better life through product innovation and building on their
Personal Care, Consumer Tissue, K-C Professional, and Health Care brands.
Headquartered in Dallas, Texas, Kimberly-Clark employs approximately 57,000
people in 36 countries with product sold in more than 150 countries. KimberlyClark is publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker KMB.
The company reported sales of $19.7 billion in 2010 of which K-C Professional
consisted of $3.1 billion and Health Care of $1.46 billion.
THE CHALLENGE
Given the rapid globalization of markets and the need to share best practices with
K-C Professional and Health Care sales and product teams around the globe,
Kimberly-Clark knew it needed a global CRM system that could support both salesrelated collaboration and mobile device access. While the company had deployed
SAP CRM in Europe, after three years of active use there were still challenges with
synchronization and server support, and homegrown systems in the United States
were also limited in their ability to support K-C Professional and Health Cares
global sales goals. With four semi-autonomous regions, managers had limited
visibility into their peers operations and best practices, and most information was
shared via e-mail or spreadsheets. In early 2009, Kimberly Clark decided to
reassess its enterprise CRM strategy with the goal of having greater global
visibility.
Corporate Headquarters
Nucleus Research Inc.
100 State Street
Boston, MA 02109
Phone: +1 617.720.2000
December 2011
Document L117
THE STRATEGY
To begin its evaluation, Kimberly-Clark issued an RFP and received responses from
SAP, StayinFront, Microsoft, and Salesforce.com. The RFPs were reviewed by three
different groups within the company: the IT infrastructure group, K-C Professional
and Health Care business teams, and the IT application services group. SAP and
Salesforce.com were the top candidates, because both could support a global
deployment with multiple languages, currencies, and mobile device strategies.
Because of Kimberly-Clarks previous challenges with SAP CRM, senior
management chose Salesforce for implementation in the K-C Professional and
Health Care businesses. Kimberly-Clark finished negotiations with Salesforce.com
in the end of January 2010 and began developing a prototype based on business
requirements.
The company had a phased deployment, starting with sales force automation (SFA)
in Asia-Pacific in May 2010 for K-C Professional and Health Care, then North
America K-C Professional with Latin American Health Care, then European K-C
Professional and Health Care, and then North American Health Care. Latin
American K-C Professionals implementation is planned for 2012. Each regions
deployment took approximately 12 to 16 weeks and included integration of
Salesforce with each regions instance of SAP using IBM Cast Iron. After SFA was
deployed to all regions, Kimberly-Clark started expanding its use of Salesforce,
which included:
Developing custom objects built with Apex and Visualforce that track key
performance indicators and deliver them in a scorecard format.
Direct
30%
Indirect
70%
December 2011
Document L117
Increased visibility and collaboration. One common global CRM system with
integrated collaboration has enabled Kimberly-Clark sales professionals to have
greater visibility into their global customer base and overall company
operations and strategy so they can identify and replicate best practices.
Training
14%
Software
48%
Personnel
23%
Consulting
13%
Hardware
2%
TOTAL: $9,556,989
BEST PRACTICES
Kimberly-Clark took a somewhat untraditional approach for an American company
of starting its CRM deployment in Asia Pacific. It chose to do so because that
2011 Nucleus Research, Inc. Reproduction in whole or part without written permission is prohibited.
Nucleus Research is the leading provider of bottom line-focused technology research and advice.
NucleusResearch.com
December 2011
Document L117
region had the most rudimentary CRM tools at the time and would likely deliver the
greatest sales improvements. Taking a phased approach to deployment also
enabled the company to take lessons learned from one region and apply them to
further phases of the rollout. This agile approach also took advantage of the cloud
development model: it enabled the company to make changes based on initial user
feedback to maximize adoption and benefits, rather than rolling out a complete
global system that would later need significant reconfiguration or customization to
be effective.
Kimberly-Clark found that the consumer-oriented look and feel of Salesforce helped
with adoption, as did the ability to meet with and learn from other Salesforce.com
customers at Dreamforce.
2011 Nucleus Research, Inc. Reproduction in whole or part without written permission is prohibited.
Nucleus Research is the leading provider of bottom line-focused technology research and advice.
NucleusResearch.com
Salesforce.com
108%
2.09
5,310,436
3,185,663
ANNUAL BENEFITS
Direct
Pre-start
0
Year 1
1,072,960
Year 2
1,747,960
Year 3
2,017,960
Indirect
2,341,587
3,699,159
5,051,683
3,414,547
5,447,119
7,069,643
DEPRECIATED ASSETS
Software
Pre-start
0
Year 1
0
Year 2
Year 3
Hardware
DEPRECIATION SCHEDULE
Pre-start
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Software
Hardware
EXPENSED COSTS
Software
Hardware
Pre-start
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
1,228,795
1,634,941
1,733,208
112,500
50,000
0
Consulting
220,471
880,041
100,000
Personnel
514,988
1,610,629
88,877
Training
889,269
493,269
Other
Total Per Period
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
2,853,524
4,618,881
2,034,585
50,000
Pre-start
Year 1
(2,853,524)
(1,204,334)
3,412,534
7,019,643
(1,426,762)
(602,167)
1,706,267
3,509,821
Year 2
-42%
39%
108%
(1,426,762)
-124%
(1,984,324)
-67%
(521,475)
-22%
2,264,734
2,853,524
7,472,404
Payback (years)
Average annual cost of ownership
3-year IRR
Year 3
2.09
4,753,495
49%
3,185,663
49%
FINANCIAL ASSUMPTIONS
All government taxes
Discount rate
50%
8%
2011 Nucleus Research, Inc. Reproduction in whole or part without written permission is prohibited. All calculations are based on Nucleus
Research's independent analysis of the expected costs and benefits associated with the solution. NucleusResearch.com