Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 311 views

    Effect of Shear Wall On Staircase

    Uploaded by

    Ram Ingalkar
    The document discusses the design of a multi-storey building using shear walls. It analyzes two models - Model 1 without shear walls and Model 3 with corner shear walls. Model 3 results in lower displacement and drift. The design is then carried out for Model 3 for different seismic zones. Static and dynamic analysis methods are described. Displacement and drift curves are presented comparing the two models for different zones. Steel reinforcement details are provided for columns and beams for both models across zones. Design steps for shear walls are outlined.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Effect of Shear Wall On Staircase

    Uploaded by

    Ram Ingalkar
    311 views18 pages
    The document discusses the design of a multi-storey building using shear walls. It analyzes two models - Model 1 without shear walls and Model 3 with corner shear walls. Model 3 results in lower displacement and drift. The design is then carried out for Model 3 for different seismic zones. Static and dynamic analysis methods are described. Displacement and drift curves are presented comparing the two models for different zones. Steel reinforcement details are provided for columns and beams for both models across zones. Design steps for shear walls are outlined.

    Original Description:

    c

    Original Title

    effect of shear wall on staircase

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document discusses the design of a multi-storey building using shear walls. It analyzes two models - Model 1 without shear walls and Model 3 with corner shear walls. Model 3 results in lower displacement and drift. The design is then carried out for Model 3 for different seismic zones. Static and dynamic analysis methods are described. Displacement and drift curves are presented comparing the two models for different zones. Steel reinforcement details are provided for columns and beams for both models across zones. Design steps for shear walls are outlined.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    311 views18 pages

    Effect of Shear Wall On Staircase

    Uploaded by

    Ram Ingalkar
    The document discusses the design of a multi-storey building using shear walls. It analyzes two models - Model 1 without shear walls and Model 3 with corner shear walls. Model 3 results in lower displacement and drift. The design is then carried out for Model 3 for different seismic zones. Static and dynamic analysis methods are described. Displacement and drift curves are presented comparing the two models for different zones. Steel reinforcement details are provided for columns and beams for both models across zones. Design steps for shear walls are outlined.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 18

    CHAPTER 5

    DESIGN OF MULTISTORIED BUILDING

    After the analysis of various models it is cleared that by using shear wall at Corner
    location (Model 3) gives minimum displacement and drift. Hence design is done for
    corner location and for maximum height i.e. for G+38, so that dynamic analysis is
    applied for all zones and then comparison is done between Model 1 and Model 3 to
    find the steel and concrete quantity required for various zones.

    For Model 1: Up to 14 storey column notation: C5, C6.


    15 to 27 storey column notation: C3, C4.
    Above 28 storey column notation: C1, C2.
    For Model 3: Up to 14 storey column notation: C3.
    15 to 27 storey column notation: C2.
    Above 28 storey column notation: C1.

    5.1 METHODS OF SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURES


    Various methods of differing complexity have been developed for the seismic
    analysis of structures. They can be classified as follows.
    1. Static Analysis
    2. Dynamic Analysis.

    28

    Methods of Static Analysis:


    The method of static analysis used here is Equivalent Static Method.
    Equivalent Static Analysis All design against earthquake effects must consider the
    dynamic nature of the load. However, for simple regular structures, analysis by
    equivalent linear static methods is often sufficient. This is permitted in most codes of
    practice for regular, low- to medium-rise buildings and begins with an estimate of
    peak earthquake load calculated as a function of the parameters given in the code.
    Equivalent static analysis can therefore work well for low to medium-rise buildings
    without significant coupled lateraltorsional modes, in which only the first mode in
    each direction is of significance. Tall buildings (over, say, 75 m), where second and
    higher modes can be important, or buildings with torsional effects, are much less
    suitable for the method, and require more complex methods to be used in these
    circumstances.
    According to clause 6.3.1.2 of IS 1893(Part1): 2000
    Load combination used:
    1) 1.5 ( DL + LL)
    2) 1.2 (DL + IL + EL)
    3) 1.5 (DL + EL)
    4) 0.9DL + 1.5EL
    Methods of Dynamic Analysis:
    The method of dynamic analysis used here is Response Spectrum Method.
    The word spectrum in seismic engineering conveys the idea that the response
    of buildings having a broad range of periods is summarized in a single graph. For a
    given earthquake motion and a percentage of critical damping, a typical response
    spectrum gives a plot of earthquake-related responses such as acceleration, velocity,

    29

    and deflection for a complete range, or spectrum, of building periods. Thus, a


    response spectrum may be visualized as a graphical representation of the dynamic
    response of a series of progressively longer cantilever pendulums with increasing
    natural periods subjected to a common lateral seismic motion of the base.
    Dynamic analysis is performed by Response Spectrum Method. In this method the
    design base shear VB is compared with a base shear VB1 calculated using a
    fundamental period Ta. Where VB is less than VB1, all the response quantity i.e.
    member force, displacements, storey forces, storey shears, base reactions are
    multiplied by VB1 / VB.

    TABLE 5.1: Factor multiplier for RSM.


    Zone II

    Zone III

    Zone IV

    Zone V

    Model 1

    1.64

    1.64

    1.59

    1.53

    Model 3

    1.33

    1.33

    1.33

    1.33

    5.2 Comparison between various Zones and Model 1, Model 3.


    5.2.1 Lateral displacement after RSM

    STOREY

    MODEL 1
    45
    40
    35
    30
    25
    20
    15
    10
    5
    0

    ZONE II
    ZONE III
    ZONE IV
    ZONE V

    0.1

    0.2
    0.3
    0.4
    DISPLACEMENT ( m )

    0.5

    0.6

    Fig 5.1: Displacement curve for Model 1


    30

    STOREY

    MODEL 3
    45
    40
    35
    30
    25
    20
    15
    10
    5
    0

    ZONE II
    ZONE III
    ZONE IV
    ZONE V

    0.1
    0.2
    0.3
    DISPLACEMENT ( m )

    0.4

    Fig 5.2: Displacement curve for Model 3

    5.2.2 Storey Drift after RSM

    STOREY

    MODEL 1
    45
    40
    35
    30
    25
    20
    15
    10
    5
    0

    ZONE II
    ZONE III
    ZONE IV
    ZONE V

    0.001

    0.002
    0.003
    DRIFT

    0.004

    0.005

    Fig 5.3: Storey Drift curve for Model 1

    31

    STOREY

    MODEL 3
    45
    40
    35
    30
    25
    20
    15
    10
    5
    0

    ZONE II
    ZONE III
    ZONE IV
    ZONE V

    0.001

    0.002
    DRIFT

    0.003

    0.004

    Fig 5.4: Storey Drift curve for Model 3

    5.2.3 Displacement for Model 1, Model 3 for individual Zone.

    STOREY

    ZONE II
    45
    40
    35
    30
    25
    20
    15
    10
    5
    0

    MODEL 1
    MODEL 3

    0.1
    0.2
    0.3
    DISPLACEMENT ( m )

    0.4

    Fig 5.5: Displacement curve for Zone II

    32

    STOREY

    ZONE III
    45
    40
    35
    30
    25
    20
    15
    10
    5
    0

    MODEL 1
    MODEL 3

    0.1

    0.2
    0.3
    0.4
    DISPLACEMENT ( m )

    0.5

    0.6

    Fig 5.6: Displacement curve for Zone III

    STOREY

    ZONE IV
    45
    40
    35
    30
    25
    20
    15
    10
    5
    0

    MODEL 1
    MODEL 3

    0.1

    0.2
    0.3
    0.4
    DISPLACEMENT ( m )

    0.5

    Fig 5.7: Displacement curve for Zone IV

    33

    STOREY

    ZONE V
    45
    40
    35
    30
    25
    20
    15
    10
    5
    0

    MODEL 1
    MODEL 3

    0.1

    0.2
    0.3
    0.4
    DISPLACEMENT ( m )

    0.5

    0.6

    Fig 5.8: Displacement curve for Zone V

    According to the results for Model 1, Model 3, the displacement and drift is maximum
    in model 1. Hence shear wall is capable for providing in multistoried building so that
    the displacement and drift will get minimum.

    34

    5.3 Ast for Model 1 and Model 3.


    B3, B4: Revised section of Beam for Model 3.
    C4, C5, C6, and C7: Revised section of column for Model 1 and 3.

    TABLE 5.2: Showing data of Ast in Zone II.


    Beam /
    Column
    No
    B1
    B2
    B3
    C1
    C2
    C3
    C4
    C5
    C6
    C7

    Model 1
    Beam / Column size

    Ast ( mm )

    300
    300

    450
    300

    418.5
    810

    450
    400
    600
    550
    800
    700
    800

    450
    400
    600
    550
    800
    700
    800

    4171.5
    3552
    11412
    9952.25
    18560
    17052
    19072

    Model 3
    Beam / Column size

    450
    300
    300
    400
    450
    550
    650
    550
    600
    650

    450
    450
    450
    400
    450
    550
    650
    550
    600
    650

    Ast ( mm )
    1680.75
    1201.5
    1120.5
    3392
    6378.75
    11041.25
    18294.25
    10436.25
    17568
    21547.5

    TABLE 5.3: Showing data of Ast in Zone III.

    Beam /
    Column
    No
    B1
    B2
    B3
    C1
    C2
    C3
    C4
    C5
    C6
    C7

    Model 1
    Beam / Column size

    Ast ( mm )

    300
    300

    450
    300

    540
    747

    500
    450
    700
    600
    900
    800

    500
    450
    700
    600
    900
    800

    5250
    3969
    12740
    8316
    23976
    8512

    35

    Model 3
    Beam / Column size

    450
    300
    400
    400
    500
    600
    650
    550
    600
    650

    450
    450
    500
    400
    500
    600
    650
    550
    600
    650

    Ast ( mm )
    2085.75
    1552.5
    2060
    3440
    7675
    16740
    22392.5
    11797.5
    18180
    24505

    TABLE 5.4: Showing data of Ast in Zone IV.


    Beam /
    Column
    No
    B1
    B2
    B3
    C1
    C2
    C3
    C4
    C5
    C6
    C7

    Model 1
    Beam / Column size

    Ast ( mm )

    450
    300

    450
    450

    1093.5
    486

    550
    550
    750
    650
    950
    850

    550
    550
    750
    650
    950
    850

    5233.25
    6201.25
    16650
    16055
    26714
    18351.5

    Model 3
    Beam / Column size

    450
    300
    400
    450
    500
    600
    700
    650

    450
    450
    500
    450
    500
    600
    700
    650

    Ast ( mm )
    2085.75
    2551.5
    2140
    4657.5
    10525
    18360
    21805
    22181.25

    TABLE 5.5: Showing data of Ast in Zone V.


    Beam /
    Column
    No
    B1
    B2
    B3
    C1
    C2
    C3
    C4
    C5
    C6
    C7

    Model 1
    Beam / Column size

    Ast ( mm )

    450
    450

    500
    450

    967.5
    911.25

    600
    700
    950
    950
    950
    950

    600
    700
    950
    950
    950
    950

    2880
    6860
    10017.75
    9656.75
    29060.5
    30685

    36

    Model 3
    Beam / Column size

    450
    300
    400
    450
    500
    600
    700
    650
    B4 = 450

    450
    450
    500
    450
    500
    600
    700
    650
    B4 = 500

    Ast ( mm )
    2875.5
    2862
    3300
    6540.75
    10875
    19440
    22344
    21589.75
    4117.5

    5.4 DESIGN STEPS FOR SHEAR WALLS


    Shear wall design is done manually by the steps as mentioned below:
    STEP 1)
    Determine design loads
    (A load factor of 0.8, instead of IS value of 0.9 and 1.2 is applied to gravity
    loads depending on whether it assists or opposes stability)
    Axial force: P1= 0.8(DL+LL) + 1.2(seismic load)
    P2= 1.2[(DL+LL) +seismic load]

    Moment:
    Shear:

    1.2[(DL+LL) +seismic load]


    1.2[(DL+LL) +seismic load]

    STEP 2)
    Check whether boundary elements are required
    Calculate I, A, Fc
    I = bd3/12
    A = bd
    Fc= P/A (M/I)y
    If Fc> 0.2 Fck, then boundary elements are required.

    37

    STEP 3)
    Adopt the dimensions of the boundary elements.

    STEP 4)
    Check whether two layers of steel are required
    A) Shear stress is more than 0.25Fck
    B) The thickness of section is more than 200 mm.

    STEP 5)
    Determine steel required
    As(min)= 0.25%

    STEP 6)
    Calculate Vsto be taken by steel
    Designed steel is necessary for Vs,
    Vs= (v - c) *bd

    STEP 7)
    Calculate steel necessary to take Vs,
    Vs/d = 0.87Fy (Asv/Sv)
    Check whether the nominal steel provided will satisfy shear requirement.
    38

    Find flexural strength of web part of wall


    Here P= 0.8(DL+LL) + 1.2(seismic load)
    Pw = P1 x ((area of web part of shear wall)/( area of web part of shear
    wall)+2 x (area of boundary element))

    STEP 8)
    Calculate the parameters , , x/L
    = Pw / fckt L
    = 0.87fy / fck
    = 0.516
    x/L = ( + )/(0.36 + 2)
    If x/L < x*/L, then tension failure occurs and the value of the moment Mu is
    obtained by taking moment of forces about the midpoint. The equation given in
    IS code is
    Mu / fck tL2= x (1+ /) x ( - 0.42 X/L) (x/L)2 * (0.168 + 2 / 3)
    Where = 0.87 fy / 0.0035 Es = 0.516

    (for Fe 415 steel)

    Taking the particular case of x/L < 0.5 and neglecting small quantities,
    Mu / fck tL2= x (1+ /) x ( - 0.42 X/L)

    If x/L > x*/L we have compression failure assuming N.A. within section i.e.
    x/L < 1 the value of Mu is given by

    Mu / fck tL2 = 1 (x/L) -2 (x/L)2 - 3-/2


    39

    Where,
    1 = 0.36 + (1- /2- 1/2)
    2 = 0.15 + /2 (1--2/2-1/3)
    3 = /6 (L/x-3)

    STEP 9)
    Calculate moment to be carried by boundary element
    M1 = B.M. M u

    STEP 10)
    Calculate compression and tension in the boundary elements due to M1
    Axial load (A1) = M1/ c
    Where c = c/c distance of shear wall
    This load acts as tension at one end and compression at the other end.

    STEP 11)
    Calculate compression due to axial loads at these ends
    Fraction of area at each end (f) = (1-x ((area of web part of shear wall) / (area
    of web part of shear wall)+2 x (area of boundary element))
    Factored compression at compression end taking the worst case scenario

    40

    P2 = f x axial load P2
    Factored compression at tension end
    P1 = f x axial load P1
    Compression at compression end = axial load (A1) + P1
    Tension at tension end = -axial load (A1) + P2
    STEP 12)
    Design the boundary elements compression
    a) Design one end as column
    b) Check laterals for confinements
    c) Check for anchorage and splice length

    STEP 13)
    Design tension side of shear wall
    Provide the same steel also on the tension end as in compression end.
    Check also for tension.
    STEP 14)
    Design the reinforcement around opening, if any, of the wall

    41

    5.5 COMPARISON
    5.5.1 STEEL COMPARISON

    TABLE 5.6: Steel quantity for all zones for model 1 and 3.

    ZONE II
    Ast quantity
    ( MT )

    ZONE III
    Ast quantity
    ( MT )

    ZONE IV
    Ast quantity
    ( MT )

    ZONE V
    Ast quantity
    ( MT )

    Model 1

    404.99

    411.21

    525.99

    524.06

    Model 3

    289.57

    340.32

    394.78

    432.5

    STEEL
    450
    400
    350
    300
    250
    ZONE II

    200
    150
    100
    50
    0
    Model 1

    Model 3

    Fig 5.9: Steel quantity for Zone II

    42

    STEEL
    450
    400
    350
    300
    250
    ZONE III

    200
    150
    100
    50
    0
    Model 1

    Model 3

    Fig 5.10: Steel quantity for Zone III

    STEEL
    600
    500
    400
    300

    ZONE IV

    200
    100
    0
    Model 1

    Model 3

    Fig 5.11: Steel quantity for Zone IV

    43

    STEEL
    600
    500
    400
    300

    ZONE V

    200
    100
    0
    Model 1

    Model 3

    Fig 5.12: Steel quantity for Zone V

    44

    5.5.2 CONCRETE COMPARISON

    TABLE 5.7: Concrete quantity for all zones for model 1 and 3
    ZONE II
    Conc. quantity
    cum

    ZONE III
    Conc. quantity
    cum

    ZONE IV
    Conc. quantity
    cum

    ZONE V
    Conc. quantity
    cum

    Model 1

    3354.08

    3670.641

    4175.11928

    5089.39728

    Model 3

    3651.46208

    3651.46208

    3718.85304

    3719.00428

    5.5.3 COST COMPARISON

    TABLE 5.8: Cost comparisons for all zones for model 1 and 3

    ZONE II
    COST (Rs)

    ZONE III
    COST (Rs)

    ZONE IV
    COST (Rs)

    ZONE V
    COST (Rs)

    Model 1

    40721082.97

    42803885.43

    51891824.17

    56813943.9

    Model 3

    36008202.51

    38799651.27

    42165425.77

    44240883.44

    45

    You might also like