Elec Eng 4Cl4:: Control System Design
Elec Eng 4Cl4:: Control System Design
Elec Eng 4Cl4:: Control System Design
Goodwin,
Chapter 6
Goodwin,
Chapter 6
Goodwin,
Chapter 6
Goodwin,
Chapter 6
Table 6.1:
Tr
Kp
0.50Kc
PI
0.45Kc
PID
0.60Kc
Pc
1.2
0.5Pc
Td
Pc
8
Goodwin,
Chapter 6
General System
If we consider a general plant of the form:
K0e s
G0(s) =
; 0 > 0
0s + 1
then one can obtain the PID settings via ZieglerNichols tuning for different values of and 0. The
next plot shows the resultant closed loop step
Goodwin,
Chapter 6
Plant response
1.5
x=0.5
1
x=2.0
0.5
Time [t/]
10
Goodwin,
Chapter 6
Numerical Example
Consider a plant with a model given by
Go (s) =
1
(s + 1)3
Goodwin,
Chapter 6
Solution
Applying the procedure we find:
Kc = 8 and c = 3.
Hence, from Table 6.1, we have
Kp = 0.6 Kc = 4.8;
Tr = 0.5 Pc 1.81;
Td = 0.125 Pc 0.45
Goodwin,
Chapter 6
Plant output
1.5
0.5
10
Time [s]
12
14
16
18
20
Goodwin,
Chapter 6
Goodwin,
Chapter 6
Plant output
1.5
0.5
10
Time [s]
12
14
16
18
20
Goodwin,
Chapter 6
Observation
In the above example, it has not made much
difference, to which form of PID the tuning rules are
applied. However, the reader is warned that this can
make a difference in general.
Chapter 6
Goodwin,
Goodwin,
Chapter 6
y yo
;
u uo
o = t1 to ;
o = t2 t1
Goodwin,
Chapter 6
yo
to
t1
t2
Time (sec.)
Goodwin,
Chapter 6
Table 6.2:
P
PI
PID
Kp
o
Ko o
0.9o
Ko o
1.2o
Ko o
Tr
Td
3o
2o
0.5o
Goodwin,
Chapter 6
Goodwin,
Chapter 6
Plant response
x=0.1
1.5
x=0.5
1
x=2.0
0.5
10
Time [t/]
15
Goodwin,
Chapter 6
Observation
We see from the previous slide that the ZieglerNichols reaction curve tuning method is very
sensitive to the ratio of delay to time constant.