Su14 IE 343 Session 28
Su14 IE 343 Session 28
Su14 IE 343 Session 28
Replacement Analysis
7/25/2014
Replacement Analysis
The objective of Chapter 9 is to address the question of whether a
currently owned asset should be kept in service or immediately
replaced.
What to do with an existing asset?
7/25/2014
Keep it
Abandon it (do not replace)
Replace it, but keep it for backup purposes
Augment the capacity of the asset
Dispose of it, and replace it with another
IE 343, Summer 2014, Engineering Economy (Sullivan, 16th)
Replacement Analysis
Three reasons to consider a change:
Physical impairment (deterioration)
Altered requirements
New and improved technology is now available.
Replacement Analysis
Economic life: the period of time (years) that yields the minimum
equivalent uniform annual cost (EUAC) of owning and operating an
asset.
Ownership life: the period between acquisition and disposal by a
specific owner.
Physical life: period between original acquisition and final disposal
over the entire life of an asset.
Useful life: the time period an asset is kept in productive service
(primary or backup).
7/25/2014
7/25/2014
Sunk-Cost Trap
Only present and future cash flows are considered in replacement
studies.
Past decisions are relevant only to the extent that they resulted in the
current situation.
Sunk costsused here as the difference between an assets BV and
MV at a particular point in timehave no relevance except to the
extent they affect income taxes.
7/25/2014
Outsider Viewpoint
The outsider viewpoint is the perspective taken by an impartial third
party to establish the fair MV of the defender. Also called the
opportunity cost approach.
The opportunity cost is the opportunity foregone by deciding to keep
an asset.
If an upgrade of the defender is required to have a competitive
service level with the challenger, this should be added to the present
realizable MV.
7/25/2014
The defender may be kept longer than its apparent economic life as
long as its marginal cost is less than the minimum EUAC of the
challenger over its economic life.
7/25/2014
Income Taxes
Replacement often results in gains or losses from the sale of
depreciable property.
Studies must be made on an after-tax basis for an accurate economic
analysis since this can have a considerable effect on the resulting
decision.
7/25/2014
Before-Tax PW (example)
Acme owns a CNC machine that it is considering replacing. Its current
market value is $25,000, but it can be productively used for four more
years at which time its market value will be zero. Operating and
maintenance expenses are $50,000 per year
Acme can purchase a new CNC machine, with the same functionality
as the current machine, for $90,000. In four years the market value of
the new machine is estimated to be $45,000. Annual operating and
maintenance costs will be $35,000 per year.
Question: Should the old CNC machine be replaced using a before-tax
MARR of 15% and a study period of four years?
7/25/2014
10
Before-Tax PW (example)
Defender:
Challenger:
11
Before-Tax PW (example)
7/25/2014
12
Before-Tax PW (example)
7/25/2014
13