Poll Results Maine 2-22-2015
Poll Results Maine 2-22-2015
Poll Results Maine 2-22-2015
Frequency
Valid
Maine
Valid
Percent
Percent
325
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
100.0
100.0
Frequency
Valid
Definitely
Very likely
Somewhat likely
Total
Valid
Percent
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
237
72.8
72.8
72.8
63
19.3
19.3
92.1
100.0
26
7.9
7.9
325
100.0
100.0
Party
Frequency
Valid
Valid
Percent
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Democratic
101
31.0
31.0
31.0
Republican
88
27.0
27.0
58.0
Independent
136
42.0
42.0
100.0
Total
325
100.0
100.0
1. President Obama has announced his intention to take executive action that would allow about 5 million illegal immigrants to live
and work legally in the United States. He plans to take this action without authorization from Congress. Do you support or oppose
the president acting on his own to allow about 5 million illegal immigrants to remain in the U.S. and grant them work authorization?
Frequency
Valid
Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Strongly support
31
9.4
9.4
9.4
Somewhat support
50
15.4
15.4
24.8
Somewhat oppose
48
14.9
14.9
39.7
171
52.6
52.6
92.2
25
7.8
7.8
100.0
325
100.0
100.0
Strongly oppose
Don't know
Total
Subsets have a larger margin of error than the whole data set. As a rule we do not rely on the validity of very small
subsets of the data, especially sets smaller than 50-75 respondents. At that size subset we can make generalizations,
but in these cases the data is more qualitative than quantitative
Zogby Analytics
Page 1
2/22/2015
Frequency
Valid
Strongly support
Valid
Percent
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
113
34.8
34.8
34.8
Somewhat support
77
23.8
23.8
58.6
Somewhat oppose
50
15.5
15.5
74.0
Strongly oppose
49
15.0
15.0
89.0
Don't know
36
11.0
11.0
100.0
325
100.0
100.0
Total
3. Last year, Sen. Angus King opposed the president taking executive action on immigration, saying 'The
Constitution...doesn't say if the president gets frustrated and Congress doesn't act, he gets to do...what he thinks
is important for the country.' However, this month Senator King voted against legislation that would bar the use of
federal funds to implement the president's plan to shield millions of illegal aliens from deportation and grant them
work authorization. Which of the following statements best reflects your views on Sen. King's stance?
Frequency
Valid
Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
154
47.4
47.4
47.4
103
31.6
31.6
79.0
68
21.0
21.0
100.0
325
100.0
100.0
4. President Obama has said that if Congress sends him a Department of Homeland Security bill that
prohibits him from using funds to implement his executive action on immigration, he will veto the bill. In
your opinion, would the president be justified in vetoing the Homeland Security funding bill because it limits
his ability to carry out his plan to shield illegal aliens from deportation and grant them work authorization?
Frequency
Valid
Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
93
28.6
28.6
28.6
202
62.1
62.1
90.8
30
9.2
9.2
100.0
325
100.0
100.0
Subsets have a larger margin of error than the whole data set. As a rule we do not rely on the validity of very small
subsets of the data, especially sets smaller than 50-75 respondents. At that size subset we can make generalizations,
but in these cases the data is more qualitative than quantitative
Zogby Analytics
Page 2
2/22/2015
Frequency
Valid
Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
70
21.6
21.6
21.6
107
33.0
33.0
54.7
147
45.3
45.3
100.0
325
100.0
100.0
6. Supporters of the president's executive action on immigration argue that it would make the country more secure because it will
help us identify the people who are currently living here illegally. Opponents of the president's plan argue that it would make the
country less secure because it would divert resources and manpower away from the department's primary mission of securing
the homeland. In your opinion, what effect would the president's executive action on immigration have on homeland security?
Frequency
Valid
Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
46
14.1
14.1
14.1
151
46.4
46.4
60.5
78
24.0
24.0
84.5
50
15.5
15.5
100.0
325
100.0
100.0
Gender
Frequency
Valid
Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Male
153
47.0
47.0
47.0
Female
172
53.0
53.0
100.0
Total
325
100.0
100.0
Subsets have a larger margin of error than the whole data set. As a rule we do not rely on the validity of very small
subsets of the data, especially sets smaller than 50-75 respondents. At that size subset we can make generalizations,
but in these cases the data is more qualitative than quantitative
Zogby Analytics
Page 3
2/22/2015
Frequency
Valid
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
156
48.1
48.9
48.9
16
4.9
5.0
53.9
14
4.2
4.3
58.2
2.8
2.8
61.0
35
10.8
10.9
71.9
Retired
90
27.6
28.1
100.0
320
98.5
100.0
1.5
325
100.0
Total
Missing
Percent
.00
Total
Household Income
Frequency
Valid
Cumulative
Percent
< $25K
70
21.5
23.5
23.5
$25-35K
47
14.5
15.8
39.3
$35-50K
60
18.6
20.3
59.6
$50-75K
64
19.6
21.4
80.9
$75-100K
35
10.9
11.9
92.8
$100-150K
13
4.1
4.5
97.3
2.4
2.7
100.0
298
91.7
100.0
27
8.3
325
100.0
$150K+
Total
Missing
Valid
Percent
Percent
Total
Age group A
Frequency
Valid
Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
18-29
45
14.0
14.0
14.0
30-49
104
32.0
32.0
46.0
50-64
111
34.0
34.0
80.0
65
20.0
20.0
100.0
325
100.0
100.0
65+
Total
Subsets have a larger margin of error than the whole data set. As a rule we do not rely on the validity of very small
subsets of the data, especially sets smaller than 50-75 respondents. At that size subset we can make generalizations,
but in these cases the data is more qualitative than quantitative
Zogby Analytics
Page 4
2/22/2015
Frequency
Valid
Valid
Percent
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
18-24
25
7.8
7.8
7.8
25-34
49
15.0
15.0
22.8
35-54
109
33.6
33.6
56.4
55-69
112
34.4
34.4
90.8
30
9.2
9.2
100.0
325
100.0
100.0
70+
Total
Generation
Frequency
Valid
Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
First Globals
74
22.8
22.8
22.8
Nikes
73
22.4
22.4
45.2
133
41.0
41.0
86.2
45
13.8
13.8
100.0
325
100.0
100.0
Woodstockers
Privates
Total
Education
Frequency
Valid
Missing
Total
Valid
Percent
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
No College Degree
163
50.1
50.6
50.6
College Degree+
159
49.0
49.4
100.0
Total
322
99.1
100.0
.00
.9
325
100.0
Subsets have a larger margin of error than the whole data set. As a rule we do not rely on the validity of very small
subsets of the data, especially sets smaller than 50-75 respondents. At that size subset we can make generalizations,
but in these cases the data is more qualitative than quantitative
Zogby Analytics
Page 5
2/22/2015
Frequency
Valid
Missing
White
Valid
Percent
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
306
94.2
96.0
96.0
Hisp
1.0
1.0
97.0
AfrAmer
1.0
1.0
98.0
Asian
.5
.5
98.5
Other
1.5
1.5
100.0
Total
319
98.2
100.0
1.8
325
100.0
.00
Total
Live
Frequency
Valid
Missing
Valid
Percent
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Lge City
14
4.4
4.5
4.5
Sm City
92
28.4
28.6
33.1
Suburbs
50
15.5
15.7
48.8
Rural
165
50.8
51.2
100.0
Total
322
99.1
100.0
.9
325
100.0
Total
Ideology Recoded
Frequency
Valid
Missing
Total
Liberal
Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
64
19.7
21.4
21.4
Moderate
124
38.1
41.2
62.6
Conservative
112
34.5
37.4
100.0
Total
300
92.4
100.0
25
7.6
325
100.0
.00
Subsets have a larger margin of error than the whole data set. As a rule we do not rely on the validity of very small
subsets of the data, especially sets smaller than 50-75 respondents. At that size subset we can make generalizations,
but in these cases the data is more qualitative than quantitative
Zogby Analytics
Page 6
2/22/2015
Frequency
Valid
Catholic
Protestant
Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
71
21.8
21.8
21.8
109
33.7
33.7
55.5
Jewish
13
4.0
4.0
59.5
Other/None
132
40.5
40.5
100.0
Total
325
100.0
100.0
BornAgain
Frequency
Valid
Missing
Valid
Percent
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Yes
46
14.1
41.8
41.8
No/NS
64
19.6
58.2
100.0
Total
109
33.7
100.0
216
66.3
325
100.0
Total
Union member
Frequency
Valid
Missing
Yes
Valid
Percent
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
39
12.0
12.1
12.1
No
283
87.2
87.9
100.0
Total
322
99.2
100.0
.8
325
100.0
Total
Frequency
Valid
Missing
Total
Yes
Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
67
20.8
21.2
21.2
No
251
77.1
78.8
100.0
Total
318
97.8
100.0
2.2
325
100.0
Subsets have a larger margin of error than the whole data set. As a rule we do not rely on the validity of very small
subsets of the data, especially sets smaller than 50-75 respondents. At that size subset we can make generalizations,
but in these cases the data is more qualitative than quantitative
Zogby Analytics
Page 7
2/22/2015
Frequency
Valid
My city or town
America
The planet earth
Total
Missing
Cumulative
Percent
90
27.8
28.1
28.1
169
52.0
52.7
80.8
62
18.9
19.2
100.0
321
98.7
100.0
1.3
325
100.0
Total
Valid
Percent
Percent
Lost a job due to corporate downsizing within the past year? <hr>
Frequency
Valid
Yes
Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
26
8.1
8.1
8.1
No
299
91.9
91.9
100.0
Total
325
100.0
100.0
Frequency
Valid
Yes
Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
61
18.7
18.7
18.7
No
264
81.3
81.3
100.0
Total
325
100.0
100.0
Worked at a job that pays less than an immediate previous job? <hr>
Frequency
Valid
Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Yes
104
32.0
32.0
32.0
No
221
68.0
68.0
100.0
Total
325
100.0
100.0
Subsets have a larger margin of error than the whole data set. As a rule we do not rely on the validity of very small
subsets of the data, especially sets smaller than 50-75 respondents. At that size subset we can make generalizations,
but in these cases the data is more qualitative than quantitative
Zogby Analytics
Page 8
2/22/2015
Frequency
Valid
Yes
Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
32
9.7
9.7
9.7
No
293
90.3
90.3
100.0
Total
325
100.0
100.0
Veteran/Armed Forces?
Frequency
Valid
Yes
Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
72
22.0
22.0
22.0
No
253
78.0
78.0
100.0
Total
325
100.0
100.0
Subsets have a larger margin of error than the whole data set. As a rule we do not rely on the validity of very small
subsets of the data, especially sets smaller than 50-75 respondents. At that size subset we can make generalizations,
but in these cases the data is more qualitative than quantitative
Zogby Analytics
Page 9
2/22/2015