Niti Aayog New Version
Niti Aayog New Version
Niti Aayog New Version
1. Achieved >9% GDP growth-rate during 2005-07, thanks to American boom prior to sub-prime crisis.
But almost all nations of world experienced high growth. So 9% GDP did not come from Monteks
magic wand.
2. Post sub-prime crisis, failed to evoke the animal spirit in Indian economy. GDP-fell, inflation rose
during 2008-13 nonstop.
3. Reduced poverty by doctoring the BPL-line. Tendulkar line says 27 crore BPL, if we use Ranga line
then 37 crore BPL. Planning commission brags reducing poverty line on Tendulkars parameters.
4. Toothless body, cant hold State/union/ministries/departments accountable for failing to achieve
targets.
5. Hopes that CAG and Public accounts Committee will take care accountability part. But PAC too is
pretty much toothless.
6. Failed to implement land reforms. Faulty policies for MSME, industrialization, Factory-labour law
problems.
7. Office manned by Generalist IAS/IES with short tenure; panel members filled with academicians and
jholachhap NGOs. Need subject specialists with international exposure like Rajanbhai.
8. Designed CSS with One size fits all approach and a few extra crores to NE/J&K/Hill-states and
LWE. But for long, it did not use pilot projects / sample testing / interaction with states.
9. Hence, IAY, ICDS etc. programs failed to show tangible result despite pumping crores.
10. They tried to bypass state Governments via NGO-funding, DRDA. Hence States unenthusiastic about
implementing Central-schemes named after you know who.
11. Only in 2013- reforms done like reducing number of Centrally sponsored schemes (CSS), 10%
flexifund to states, direct transfer of money to state consolidated fun etc. But its too little too late.
12. Shortcomings in planning commission => new bodies sprung up like PMs economic advisory
council, PMs project monitoring group and so on=> more brains=> more lack of coordination.
13. Hence Modi felt that PC is beyond fixing- just like Gotham city and Delhi city.
14. For so many years, Government worked as the provider of first and last resort. But, today Indian
industry and service sector has reached on global scale, a neo-middle class has emerged.
15. Times have changed, from being a underdeveloped country in 1950s India has become a major
economic force.
16. Hence our needs have changed- from mere food security to profitable agriculture. In this playground,
Government needs to become an enabler rather than a player.
And thus Niti Aayog was born.
The 8th Five Year Plan document - the very first after the liberalisation of 1991 - itself
categorically stated that, as the role of Government was reviewed and restructured, the role
and functions of the Planning Commission too needed to be rethought. The Planning
Commission needed to be reformed to keep up with changing trends; letting go of old practices
and beliefs whose relevance had been lost, and adopting new ones based on the past
experiences of India as well as other nations.
The Standing Committee on Finance of the 15th Lok Sabha - observed in its 35th Report on
Demand for Grants (2011-12) that the Planning Commission "has to come to grips with the
emerging social realities to re-invent itself to make itself more relevant and effective for
aligning the planning process with economic reforms and its consequences, particularly for the
poor".
Former Prime Minister and noted economist, Dr. Manmohan Singh - in his farewell address
to the Commission in April 2014 - also urged reflection on "what the role of the Planning
Commission needs to be in this new world. Are we still using tools and approaches which were
designed for a different era? What additional roles should the Planning Commission play and
what capacities does it need to build to ensure that it continues to be relevant to the growth
process?"
Mahatma Gandhi had said: "Constant development is the law of life, and a man who always tries to
maintain his dogmas in order to appear consistent drives himself into a false position". Keeping true to
this principle our institutions of governance and policy must evolve with the changing dynamics of the new
India, while remaining true to the founding principles of the Constitution of India, and rooted in our
Bharatiyata or wisdom of our civilizational history and ethos.
NITI Aayog (National Institution for Transforming India) is to be the institution to give life to these
aspirations. It is being formed based on extensive consultation across the spectrum of stakeholders,
including inter alia state governments, relevant institutions, domain experts and the people at large.
14. Capacity building: Enable capacity building and technology up-gradation across government,
benchmarking with latest global trends and providing managerial and technical knowhow.
15. Monitoring and Evaluation: Monitor the implementation of policies and programmes, and
evaluate their impact; through rigorous tracking of performance metrics and comprehensive
program evaluations. This will not only help identify weaknesses and bottlenecks for
necessary course correction, but also enable data-driven policy making; encouraging greater
efficiency as well as effectiveness.
Establish a direct communication channel between the State / Ministry and NITI Aayog for
all development related matters, as the dedicated liaison interface.
A national Hub-Spoke institutional model will be developed, with each State and Ministry
encouraged to build dedicated mirror institutions, serving as the interface of interaction. These
institutions, in turn, will nurture their own networks of expertise at State and Ministry level.
NITI Aayog will function in close cooperation, consultation and coordination with the Ministries
of the Central Government, and State governments. While it will make recommendations to the
Central and State Governments, the responsibility for taking and implementing decisions will rest
with them.
7. Planning commission and NDC decided special category states and gave them additional funding
to help the poor and backward regions. With advent of Niti Aayog, will those states lose their status
and extra-funding? Uncertainty prevails.
8. Niti Aayog will conflict with Cabinet Secretariat (for inter-ministerial coordination) and
constitutional body Inter State Council (for coordination with states).
9. FinMin officials always try to squeeze budget to keep the fiscal deficit under FRBM targets. Niti
Aayog and its free market economists will further reduce welfare schemes to help them.
10. At present weve 60+ centrally sponsored schemes. Modi aims to combine them into just 10
schemes. Thus, poor and marginalized communities will suffer.
11. Planning commission used to monitor of human development in the States, Sub-plans for women, SC
and ST. Niti Aayog doesnt say how theyll do it.
12. Niti Aayogs mandate repeatedly says theyll focus on manufacturing sector. Rajanbhai says just
because China succeeded on manufacturing focus, doesnt automatically guarantee that same
Cinderella story will repeat here.
13. Modi distributed the planning-Expenditure function to FinMin and subject matters to respective
ministries. This will result in loss of perspective and long-term view. Now State governments will
have to lobby at both type of ministries to get funds released.
14. Planning Commissions Nehruvian Economists advocated decentralized planning. Modis free
market economists and technocrats will pursue centralized planning and e-monitoring. (It is both pro
and anti-argument depending on how brainwashed a person is after reading theHindu.)
15. 1961: Indian Economic Service (IES) was born on Nehrus initiative. Modi doesnt invite them in
meetings, free market economists look down upon them with utter disdain. How theyll be integrated
in the new system? No clear answers given in the press-release.
16. There is no need for any Planning commission or Niti Aayog. Good work can be done even without
them- through line ministries and inter-state councils