Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 277 views

    Oral Presentation Rubric

    Uploaded by

    David Montoya
    This rubric evaluates oral presentations on several criteria including the ability to engage the audience, voice and delivery, development of the topic, use of visual aids, and answering audience questions. Presentations are rated on a scale from below the expected level to above the expected level. At the expected level, the topic is introduced clearly, the presenter speaks audibly and at a good pace, the topic is developed with relevant details, visual aids support the presentation, and most audience questions can be answered. Above the expected level, the presenter engages and adapts to the audience, demonstrates a strong understanding of the topic, and answers questions demonstrating in-depth knowledge.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Oral Presentation Rubric

    Uploaded by

    David Montoya
    277 views2 pages
    This rubric evaluates oral presentations on several criteria including the ability to engage the audience, voice and delivery, development of the topic, use of visual aids, and answering audience questions. Presentations are rated on a scale from below the expected level to above the expected level. At the expected level, the topic is introduced clearly, the presenter speaks audibly and at a good pace, the topic is developed with relevant details, visual aids support the presentation, and most audience questions can be answered. Above the expected level, the presenter engages and adapts to the audience, demonstrates a strong understanding of the topic, and answers questions demonstrating in-depth knowledge.

    Original Description:

    ingles

    Original Title

    Oral Presentation Rubric (3)

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This rubric evaluates oral presentations on several criteria including the ability to engage the audience, voice and delivery, development of the topic, use of visual aids, and answering audience questions. Presentations are rated on a scale from below the expected level to above the expected level. At the expected level, the topic is introduced clearly, the presenter speaks audibly and at a good pace, the topic is developed with relevant details, visual aids support the presentation, and most audience questions can be answered. Above the expected level, the presenter engages and adapts to the audience, demonstrates a strong understanding of the topic, and answers questions demonstrating in-depth knowledge.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    277 views2 pages

    Oral Presentation Rubric

    Uploaded by

    David Montoya
    This rubric evaluates oral presentations on several criteria including the ability to engage the audience, voice and delivery, development of the topic, use of visual aids, and answering audience questions. Presentations are rated on a scale from below the expected level to above the expected level. At the expected level, the topic is introduced clearly, the presenter speaks audibly and at a good pace, the topic is developed with relevant details, visual aids support the presentation, and most audience questions can be answered. Above the expected level, the presenter engages and adapts to the audience, demonstrates a strong understanding of the topic, and answers questions demonstrating in-depth knowledge.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    ORAL PRESENTATION RUBRIC

    Criteria

    Below expected
    level

    Ability to
    engage and
    involve
    audience

    Voice: clarity,
    pace, fluency

    Above expected
    level

    Topic introduced.

    Topic introduced
    clearly, and purpose
    of talk was made
    clear.

    Topic introduced
    clearly and in an
    interesting way.
    Purpose of talk was
    made clear. Outline of
    points was given.

    Some understanding
    of topic shown.
    Some links and
    connections made
    between ideas.
    Points are usually
    developed with
    minimum detail.
    Information is
    usually relevant.

    Good understanding
    of topic shown. Links
    and connections
    between ideas made
    clear. Information was
    relevant and
    expressed in own
    words. Points were
    developed with
    sufficient and
    appropriate details.

    A very good
    understanding of the
    topic shown. Links
    and connections
    between ideas made
    clear. Information was
    relevant and well
    expressed in own
    words. Points were
    well-organised and
    developed with
    sufficient and
    appropriate details.

    Some eye contact


    was made.

    An interesting
    approach taken to
    topic. Speaker used
    techniques such as
    visual aids and props,
    anecdote, surprising
    facts, direct audience
    participation.

    Speaker monitored
    audience and adapts
    presentation
    accordingly. An
    interesting or original
    approach taken to the
    topic. Speaker used
    techniques such as
    visual aids and props,
    anecdote, humour,
    surprising facts, direct
    audience
    participation.

    Presenter usually
    spoke clearly to
    ensure audience
    comprehension.
    Delivery was usually
    fluent.

    Presenter spoke
    clearly and at a good
    pace to ensure
    audience
    comprehension.
    Delivery was fluent
    and expressive.

    Introduction of
    topic

    Development
    of topic

    At expected level

    Techniques used to
    engage audience
    were minimal, or
    mainly ineffective.

    Presenter
    occasionally spoke
    clearly and at a good
    pace.

    Vocabulary,
    sentence
    structure,
    grammar

    Pronunciation

    Cultural
    conventions
    for oral
    presentation

    Use of visual
    aids

    Conclusion of
    topic

    Answering
    questions
    from audience

    The vocabulary of
    the presentation was
    mainly appropriate
    for the topic. The
    presentation content
    was occasionally
    grammatically
    correct.

    The vocabulary of the


    presentation was
    appropriate for the
    topic. Sentence
    structures were
    usually correct. The
    presentation content
    was usually
    grammatically correct.

    The vocabulary of the


    presentation was
    appropriate for the
    topic. A variety of
    phrases and sentence
    structures were used.
    The presentation
    content was
    grammatically correct.

    Pronunciation
    occasionally correct,
    but often hesitant
    and inaccurate.

    Pronunciation and
    intonation is usually
    correct.

    Pronunciation and
    intonation is correct
    and confident.

    Greetings and
    general presentation
    are not culturally
    inappropriate.

    Greetings are
    culturally appropriate.
    Questions are
    answered
    appropriately.

    Greetings are
    culturally appropriate.
    Gestures, stance and
    eye contact are
    appropriate. Questions
    are answered
    appropriately.

    No visual aids were


    used; OR

    Visual aids supported


    the presentation
    effectively. They
    clarified and
    reinforced the spoken
    message.

    Visual aids were


    carefully prepared and
    supported the
    presentation
    effectively. They
    clarified and
    reinforced the spoken
    message. The aids
    added impact and
    interest to the
    presentation.

    An attempt was
    made to conclude the
    presentation.

    The presentation was


    summed up clearly.

    The presentation was


    summed up clearly
    and effectively, with
    key points
    emphasised.

    Not all questions


    could be answered.
    Questions answered
    with difficulty, and
    little knowledge of
    the topic was
    demonstrated.

    Most questions
    answered.

    Visual aids were


    occasionally
    appropriate and
    related to the spoken
    message.

    Questions answered
    with little difficulty.
    Very good knowledge
    Answers showed good
    of the topic was
    knowledge and
    demonstrated.
    understanding of the
    Language was correct
    topic. Language was
    and fluent.
    mainly correct.

    You might also like