Box Girder - Specifications, Advantages & Disadvantages: Bridges
Box Girder - Specifications, Advantages & Disadvantages: Bridges
Box Girder - Specifications, Advantages & Disadvantages: Bridges
Box girders can be universally applied from the point of view of load
carrying, to their indifference as to whether the bending moments are
positive or negative and to their torsional stiffness; from the point of view
of economy.
It was only with the development of high strength prestressing steel that
it became possible to span longer distances. The first
prestressed concrete bridges, most of I-cross sections were built towards
the end of the 1920s.The great breakthrough was achieved only after
1945. THE SCLAYN bridge over the river Maas, which was built by
Magnel in 1948, was the first continuous prestressed concrete box-girder
bridge with 2 spans of 62.70m. In following years the ratio of wages to
material costs climbed sharply. This thereby shifted the emphasis of
development of construction method. The box girder cross-section
evolved structurally from the hollow cell-deck bridge or T-beam Bridge.
The widening of the compression zone that began as a structural
requirement at the central piers was in the extended throughout the
entire length of bridge because of advantages transverse load-carrying
characteristics.
Evolution of Box Girder:
The spanning of bridges started with simple slabs. As the spans
increased, the design depth of slab is also increased. It is known that
material near centre of gravity contributes very little for flexure and
hence can be removed. This leads to beam and slab systems. The
reinforcement in bottom bulb of beam provided capacity for tensile forces
and top slab concrete, the capacity to resist the compression. They
formed a couple to resist flexure.
As the width of slab is increased more number of longitudinal girders are
required resulting in reduction of stiffness of beams in transverse
direction and relatively high transverse curvature. The webs of beams get
opened out spreading radially from top slab. Under high transverse
bending these will no longer be in their original position. To keep it in
their original position the bulbs at bottom should be tied together which
in-turn leads to evolution of box girder. Long spans with wider decks and
eccentric loading on cross-section will suffer in curvature in longitudinal
and transverse direction causing heavy distortion of cross-section. Hence
the bridges should have high torsional rigidity in order to resist the
distortion of cross-section deck to a minimum.
Accordingly box girders are more suitable for larger spans and wider
decks, box girders are to be suitable cross-section. They are elegant and
slender. Economy and aesthetics further lead to evolution of cantilevers in
top flanges and inclined webs in external cells of box girder. The
dimension of cell could be controlled by prestressing.
As the span and width increases the beams and bottom slabs are to be
tied to keep the geometry which in turn leads to evolution box girder.
Any eccentric load will cause high torsional stresses which will be counter
acted by the box section. The analysis of such sections are more
complicated due combination of flexure, shear, torsion, distortion. But it is
more efficient cross-section. It is used for larger spans with wide crosssection. It can be used for spans up to 150m depending upon the
construction methods. Cantilever method of construction is preferred
most.
Advantages Associated with Box Girders:
The very large Torsional rigidity of the box girders closed cellular
section provides structures beneath is more aesthetically pleasing than
open-web type system.
Disadvantages:
One of the main disadvantages of box decks is that they are difficult to
cast in-situ due to the inaccessibility of the bottom slab and the need to
extract the internal shutter. Either the box has to be designed so that the
entire cross section may be cast in one continuous pour, or the cross
section has to be cast in stages.
Specifications:
It can cover a range of spans from 25 m up to the largest non-suspended
concrete decks built; of the order of 300 m. Single box girders may also
carry decks up to 30 m wide. For the longer span beams, beyond about
50 m, they are practically the only feasible deck section. Below 30m
precast beams or voided slab decks are more suitable while above 50ma
single cell box arrangement is usually more economic.
Single cell box-girder cast-in-situ are used for spans form 40m to
270m.The box arrangement is done in order to give aesthetic appearance
where the web of box will act as a slender appearance when combined
with a slim parapet profile. Single box arrangements are efficient for both
the longitudinal and transverse designs, and they produce an economic
solution for mot medium and long span structures. This type of deck is
constructed span-by-span, using full-height scaffolding or trusses, or as
balanced cantilever using form travelers. This could be particularly
important for medium length bridges with spans between 40m and 55m.
Such spans are too long for twin rib type decks, and too short for cast-insitu balanced cantilever construction of box girders, while a total length of
box section deck of less than about 1,000 m does not justify setting up a
precast segmental facility.
Haunches:
The uprights have to carry the same bending moment as the haunch, but
with the benefit of a compression force due to the weight of the roof.
Thus they may be slightly thinner than the haunches. Haunches are
always economical. They provide the twin benefits of attracting moment
away from mid-span and then providing a greater lever arm to resist this
moment economically. Even very short haunches are valuable in reducing
the hogging reinforcement.
PREVIOUS ARTICLE
Search
SIMILAR ARTICLES