Maldonado - Torres - Césaire's Gift and The Decolonial Turn

RPR
Volume 9 Number 2 2006
Radical
Philosophy
Review
Journal of the Radical Philosophy Association
Radical Philosophy Review (ISSN 1388-4441) is published biannually by

the Radical Philosophy Association (RPA) in cooperation with the Philosophy
Documentation Center. An individual subscription to this peer-reviewed journal
includes membership in the RPA. More information about the Association is
available online at www.radicalphilosophy.org.
Radical Philosophy Review

Subscription rates are $69 for Institutions and $42 for Individuals.
Please add $8 shipping to all addresses outside the U.S.
Single/back issues are available to Institutions for $35 and to
Individuals for $21.
VISA, MasterCard, and Discover cards accepted.
Membership & Subscriptions

All correspondence regarding subscriptions, renewals,
memberships, and address changes should be addressed to:
Philosophy Documentation Center
P.O. Box 7147, Charlottesville, Virginia 22906-7147
Tel. 800-444-2419 (US & Canada); 434-220-3300
Fax: 434-220-3301; E-mail: order@pdcnet.org;
Web: www.pdcnet.org
Radical Philosophy Review accepts unsolicited articles of no more than 10,000
words, review essays of no more than 5,000 words, and book reviews of no more
than 2,000 words. Authors interested in writing review essays and book reviews are
encouraged to contact the Managing Editor for copies of recently published books.
Editorial & Submissions

All editorial correspondence should be addressed to:
Jeffrey Paris
Managing Editor, RPR
Department of Philosophy
University of San Francisco
2130 Fulton Street
San Francisco, CA 94117
E-mail: paris@usfca.edu
Manuscripts should be sent as e-mail attachments (preferably in MS Word) to
paris@usfca.edu; a hard copy and a disk may also be sent to the address above.
Manuscripts should be prepared for blind refereeing with all direct and indirect
references to the author removed. Please include an abstract of no more than
100 words with each article, as well as a short author bio including e-mail and
mailing address. Citation style should follow the Chicago Manual of Style. Please
use embedded (not typed out) notes. Style sheets are available from the Managing
Editor. Publication decisions are typically made within 6 months.
volume 9, number 2 (2006)
Editors Introduction
iii
Csaires Gift and the
Decolonial Turn
Nelson Maldonado-Torres
111
The Internal Limits of the
European Gaze: Intellectuals

and the Colonial Difference
George Ciccariello-Maher
139
C.L.R. Jamess Analysis of

Race and Class
John R. Martin, Jr.
167
The Rights of Others, by

Seyla Benhabib
David Ingram
191
Workers Councils, by
Anton Pannekoek
Nic Veroli
197
The Specter of Democracy,

by Dick Howard
Caroline Arruda
201
Eduardo Mendieta & Jeffrey Paris
The Post-Colonial Atlantic
Book Reviews
Contributors
208
Books for Review
210
ew readers of Radical Philosophy Review are likely to have read a 2003

essay by Amartya Sen because of the place it was published, namely The
New Republic. Sen, winner of the 1998 Nobel Prize in Economics and, along with
Martha Nussbaum, the main articulator of the so-called capabilities approach,
wrote Democracy and its Global Roots: Why democratization is not the same
as Westernization (The New Republic, October 6, 2003), an essay, furthermore,
that was not included in his recent collection entitled The Argumentative Indian:
Writings on Indian History, Culture and Identity (Harvard University Press, 2005).
Democracy and its Global Roots is a wonderful exercise in deconstructive
hermeneutics and global intellectual history; Sen argues that we should not fall
into the trap set by the feigned modesty of the West, in which Westerners opt for
a parsimonious and humble approach to democracy in non-Western parts of the
world, arguing that they do not want to impose their values on other cultures.
The trap here is that if we accept the gesture of feigned modesty, we also accept
the inchoate, concealed assumption that democracy is of the West to give to others
as a gift. Democracy, however, is neither a product of one civilization, the West
alone, nor is it of the West to give. The West has enjoyed it, perhaps the longest,
but only because it is the recipient of a gift bestowed by both internal and external
volume 9, number 2 (2006) iii-v
iv
struggles. Democracy remains one of the most global of human endeavors, a

project that transcends boundaries and cuts across cultures and civilizations.
Sen denounces the blackmail of ersatz Western modesty and the gross neglect
of the intellectual history of non-Western societies which, along with the conceptual defects of seeing democracy primarily in terms of balloting leads to
the misappropriation whereby the West claims paternity and intellectual property
rights for democracy.1 In this issue of RPR we present three contributions, collected
in a special section called The Post-Colonial Atlantic, that are correctives to this
gross neglect, eloquently redirecting our attention away from sclerotic academic
scholarship that keeps cycling the same old texts and problems, and towards new
approaches and a broader archive than that of the insouciant West.
In our first essay, Csaires Gift and the Decolonial Turn, Nelson MaldonadoTorres offers a dual reading of Aim Csaire, locating him in relationship to the
classics of modern European philosophy, in particular Descartes, while at the same
time re-contextualizing his work in the contemporary project of decoloniality and the
re-mapping of reason, announced by Enrique Dussel and since taken up by thinkers
including Paget Henry, Lewis Gordon, Walter Mignolo, and Ramon Grosfoguel.
Maldonado-Torres urges us to think of Csaire as a Black Husserl, not because the
latter is the paragon that all must emulate, but because the former was getting at the
root of the modern existential malaise. His Discourse on Colonialism reconstitutes the
Discourse on Method and holds up a mirror to Western reason; in Csaire, epistemic
anxiety and hypothetical evil demons turn into existential dread and terrifying,
murderous masters, but this time, it is the slave who perceives with clarity and
distinctness the logic of possession enacted by the master. In return, we discover
the decolonial gift, the reason of the slave, which opposes the false imperial gift
described by Sen.
It is indeed a shame that we go through life thinking that there is a lineage that
begins with Descartes, and weaves through Spinoza, Peirce, Heidegger, Husserl,
Sartre, and Foucault, but which does not include either Csaire or Fanon (and of
course also not Iris Young and Susan Bordo, each of whom have been post-Cartesian
in most exemplary ways). George Ciccariello-Mahers essay, The Internal Limits of
the European Gaze, complements Maldonado-Torress by offering an immanent
critique of the European criticisms of Eurocentrism. Here, one is to be reminded that
hermeneutical suspicion is only earned after both humility and generosity have been
exercised. said to have been transformed into one. Sartres usually unacknowledged debt
to Fanon moved him from the position of a universal intellectual hiding behind the
European gaze to a revolutionary stance focused on colonial subjectivity. CiccarielloMaher argues that Foucault, though he learned form Sartre a certain skepticism
regarding the European gaze, failed to see other possibilities for a new humanism,
an alter-humanism that moves out from the periphery and learns from Csaire
and Fanon.
John R. Martin, Jr.s essay, C.L.R. Jamess Analysis of Race and Class, also
moves out from the Caribbean, that crucible of avant la lettre critiques of the
impossible project of modernity. Martin retraces the ways in which C.L.R. James
elaborated a Marxist-rooted analysis of racism and race consciousness that was
neither reductivist nor dichotomizing. In Martins view, James is someone who
has not lost any of his theoretical punch and incisiveness, and in fact has regained
new vitality and contemporaneity due to enduring racism in the U.S., and the lost
possibilities for a socialist democracy rooted in the critique of both race and class.
Together, these three essays are stones from which to build a new edifice of cosmopolitan learning and philosophizing, an edifice that has no place within it for
the kind of epistemic hubris and arrogance so long practiced by the West.
To round out the issue, reviews by David Ingram and Caroline Arruda bring
together in print two old colleagues: Seyla Benhabib and Dick Howard, who both
used to be contributors of Telos before the journal made its anti-Habermasian turn.
Each looks to problems of democracy, whether in the paradox of its exclusions or
the conceptual grounds for identifying it as a project. We are also pleased to
recognize, in a review by Nic Veroli, the AK Press reprint of Anton Pannekoeks
influential Workers Councils. As Veroli argues, the practical reality of workers
councils has always exceeded the occasionally numbing presentations of its logical
coherence. Democracy, too, or so we think, needs to learn from these practical
realities, since although it is far advanced in theory, its limitations in practice are
more than obvious to you, our reader.
1. Amartya Sen, Democracy and its Global Roots: Why Democratization is Not the
Same as Westernization, The New Republic, October 6, 2003, http://www.tnr.com/
arch/issues/20031006/ (accessed September 26, 2006); see also http://cscs.umich.edu/
~crshalizi/sloth/2003-09-29a.html.
Csaires Gift and the

Decolonial Turn
Abstract: Aim Csaires Discourse on Colonialism is
central to the project of decoloniality. It is a critical
reflection on the European civilization project that gives
expression to the disenchantment with European modernity that began to be felt in many places after the
Second World War. This essay describes the overcoming of
Cartesian reason through the decolonial gift, which
makes possible an opening toward transmodernity, an
alternate response or pathway in view of the declining
geo-political and epistemological significance of Europe
and the United States.
A civilization that proves incapable of solving the

problems that it creates is a decadent civilization.
A civilization that chooses to close its eyes to its
most crucial problems is a stricken civilization.
A civilization that uses its principles for trickery
and deceit is a dying civilization.
Aim Csaire, Discourse on Colonialism.1
1. Aim Csaire, Discourse on Colonialism, trans. Joan Pinkham (New York: Monthly
Review Press, 1972). This article is an expanded version of the essay Aim Csaire y la
crisis del hombre europeo, in Aim Csaire, Discurso sobre el colonialismo (Madrid:
Ediciones Akal, 2006), 173-96. A first draft was presented in the 2004 Meeting of the
African Studies Association. Parts of a more recent version were presented in the Second
Annual Meeting of the Caribbean Philosophy Association in 2005. Thanks to George
Ciccariello Maher for assistance in translation.
volume 9, number 2 (2006) 111-138
112
Csaires Gift and the Decolonial Turn
im Csaires indictment of European civilization occurred at a point when

Europes crisis reached its climax. It was only a decade after the end of the
Second World War, when the impact of the first decolonization struggles on European
discourse and on the minds of other colonized peoples throughout the world was
already obvious. From then on Europe gradually became more marginal than ever in
its not so recent history. Today, Europe is politically, economically, and intellectually
important, but not as important as before the war and certainly not defensible in
Csaires termseven though post-Cold War admirers from Eastern Europe, Russia,
and the former Soviet republics sometimes ignore or forget the lesson.2 Relative
admiration of Europe in the post-Cold War, however, does not hide a present crisis
in European identity. This new crisis can be understood, using Boaventura de Sousa
Santoss terms, as a standing in between the new imperial Prospero and the old
Caliban.3 For Sousa Santos this term best describes the position of Portugal in relation to European countries such as France and Great Britain on the one hand, and
the colonial world, on the other. But the term could be extended to refer to the ways
in which many other Europeans feel today. As the United States has asserted its
independence from Europe more openly than ever before since after the Second
World War, Europeans begin to experience some degrees of subalternity. The
responses to such a position have been predictable.
One response to the crisis of Europe today consists in reminding the United
States of the Western origins of its roots and the need for partnership with Europe.4
This response is part of an imperial dialectic between Eurocentrism and a form of
Americanism that is also facing a moment of crisis with distinct internal and external
menaces.5 It fights the provincial imperialism of U.S. Americanism with another
form of provincialism grounded in the European experience. A second response calls
attention to the need of defining a European common foreign policy based on the
political viability of the European Union. Also part of the imperial dialectics of
recognition, this response by philosophers Jrgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida

involves recasting and reaffirming the value of European cultural and intellectual
roots.6 It is almost as problematical as the first, not because it searches for common
grounds among members of the European Union, but because it gestures toward
the formerly colonized non-European world only very vaguely and thus fails to
address the challenges that Europe still has to overcome in relation to its imperial
and colonial legacy.
The third response is more promising. It consists in the idea of de-investing
from U.S. interests.7 This response goes together with the realization of a certain
commonality between Europe and its former colonies. It is the emergence of a certain
European postcolonialismnot of Europeans who support decolonization, but of
the perception of Europe itself as a colony. To be sure, this idea is not by any means
widespread or without risks. For while the identification with the colonies opens
unsuspected possibilities of mutual respect and collaboration, it can easily follow
the path of an Eurocentric appropriation of the legacy and work of intellectuals
from the peripherythat is, a re-centering of Europe and a new marginalization of
the colonized and their perspectives. There is also the risk of erasing the significant
differences between Europes subaltern status today and the legacies of its own forms
of racial colonialism in the former European colonies. The effective evasion of these
risks necessitates constant vigilance together with a process of self-decolonization,
which in this case implies a necessary moment for Europeans of giving more priority
to seeing themselves through the eyes of the colonized and deriving the consequence
of such observation, than to the validation of their identity, their roots, and their
geopolitical relevance. Europeans, just as the formerly colonized, cannot take any
idea for granted in the production of their refashioned identity and political projects.
They need to critically revise their history and their ideas in light of questions
and concerns that appear prominently not only in the marginalized spaces within
Europe, but also in the colonial context.
In a historical moment when Europeans and others look to the south for
responses to the crisis of the age, it is important to clarify and elaborate on the
contributions of intellectuals from the colonial world. If, as Immanuel Wallerstein
has pointed out, we live in a kairos moment where choice is both necessary and
important, then we need to investigate more the intellectual resources that might shed
2. I thank the participants of the workshop on Transcultural Humanities at the University

of Bremen for discussion of related ideas, particularly Sabine Broeck, one of the organizers,
and Madina Tlostanova. Broeck explicitly brought out the Csairean theme of the indefensibility of Europe and Tlostanova provided ample reflections on the crisis of the Russian
intellectual and political environment in relation to the enchantment with Europe.
3. Boaventura de Sousa Santos, Between Prospero and Caliban: Colonialism, Postcolonialism,
and Inter-identity, Review: A Journal of the Fernand Braudel Center for the Study of
Economies, Historical Systems, and Civilizations 28 (forthcoming 2005).
4. See, for example, Will Hutton, A Declaration of Interdependence: Why America Should
Join the World (New York: W. W. Norton, 2003).
5. Nelson Maldonado-Torres, Decolonization and the New Identitarian Logics after September 11: Eurocentrism and Americanism against the New Barbarian Threats, Radical
Philosophy Review 8, no. 1 (2005): 35-67.
113
6. Jrgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida, February 15, or What Binds Europeans Together:
A Plea for a Common Foreign Policy, Beginning in the Core of Europe, Constellations 10,
no. 3 (2003): 291-7.
7. Richard Sennett talked about this in a meeting of the Academy of Latinity (New York
University, October 7, 2004).
114
light into our current predicament and that may provide guidelines for the future.8
There is the need of expanding on insights and projects that have remained marginal
and have been silenced because their premises or proposals question the very bases
of the European civilization project as well as our modern identities. Translation
and transgression of different projects on critical theorizing are also needed if we
want to widen and refine the alternatives that we have as we attempt to collectively
respond to the future. Exercises in transgresstopic critique are today as important
as ever.9 This essay is an exercise in such a kind of criticism and theory making. It
joins other efforts in subverting the tables of what is considered legitimate theorizing
and in augmenting the space for reflection about our collective present and future,
engaging in the epistemic practice of what the Caribbean Philosophical Association
refers to as shifting the geography of reason.10 The first section of this essay seeks to
elucidate the significance of decolonization as a project and to elaborate a genealogy
of what I refer to here as the decolonial turn. The decolonial turn (different
from the linguistic or the pragmatic turns) refers to the decisive recognition and
propagation of decolonization as an ethical, political, and epistemic project in the
twentieth century. This project reflects changes in historical consciousness, agency,
and knowledge, and it also involves a method or series of methods that facilitate the
task of decolonization at the material and epistemic levels.
The second part focuses on method. I identify basic principles of decolonial
methodology as they appear in Aim Csaires Discourse on Colonialism. Csaires
Discourse provides one of the most penetrating analyses of the crisis of Europe in
and after the Second World War and the beginnings of decolonization movements
around the world in the twentieth century. It seeks to show Europeans certain truths
about themselves as well as provide an intellectual framework for conceiving of and
advancing decolonization. In this sense, Csaires Discourse on Colonialism can be
read as a discourse on decolonial methodology: it facilitates the decolonization of the
European and the colonized. The Discourse appears to be in relation to the project of
decolonization in a similar way to how other discourses on method stand in relation
to the project of European civilization. I am thinking quite clearly of Ren Descartes.
I will take the relation of Csaires Discourse on Colonialism to Descartes Discourse

on Method further by suggesting that the former can actually be read as a response
to the latter. In this sense Csaire joins figures like Edmund Husserl and Martin
Heidegger, among others, who reflected deeply about the connection of the nature
and crisis of Europe to Cartesian premises. It is widely known that while Husserl
wished to radicalize Descartes and to strengthen the European rationalist vein and
the French cosmopolitan impetus, Heidegger, a German nationalist who at one point
served as a functionary of the Nazi administration, enlisted Descartes as one of the
pivotal thinkers in the path that led and continued the forgetting of the question of
Being. Heidegger also celebrated German language and customs and questioned the
philosophical relevance of Romance languages. Appropriation or rejection of the
Cartesian legacy stood behind philosophical formulations of cosmopolitanism and
nationalism. Csaire, as well as his once student Fanon, had a different view,
a different project, as well as a different geopolitical point of departure: not a
Germany in crisis with varied reactions to French liberal cosmopolitanism and
the Cartesian legacy in Europe, but the colonial world, and more particularly,
the French Caribbean colonies. Csaires Discourse is the response of a black colonial
subject to the Cartesian project. He mobilizes those aspects of his identity and
geopolitical orientation towards a critical reflection on the basis of the European
civilization project. It is such a critical theory that I wish to locate historically and
then to explicate with the hope of providing more tools for the understanding of
decolonization as a project and the self-decolonization of Europeans and others.
8. Immanuel Wallerstein, Utopistics: Or, Historical Choices of the Twenty-First Century (New
York: New Press, 1998).
9. Nelson Maldonado-Torres, Post-imperial Reflections on Crisis, Knowledge, and Utopia:
Transgresstopic Critical Hermeneutics and the Death of European Man, Review 25, no.
3 (2002): 277-315.
10. Lewis R. Gordon, African-American Philosophy, Race, and the Geography of Reason,
in Not Only the Masters Tools: Theoretical Explorations in African American Studies,
ed. Lewis R. Gordon and Jane Anna Gordon (Boulder, CO.: Paradigm Press, 2006), 3-50;
Lewis R. Gordon, From the President of the Caribbean Philosophical Association,
Caribbean Studies 33, no. 2 (2005): xv-xxii.
115
I. From the Idea to the Project of Decolonization in the

Twentieth Century
Decolonization not only refers to the critique of and effort to dismantle neocolonial relations that continued and renewed in different ways dependency and
vertical relations of power between northern and southern countries, but also to
radical transformation of the modern/colonial matrix of power which continues to
define modern identities as well as the relations of power and epistemic forms that
go along with them. We owe to Walter Mignolo the concept of the modern/colonial
world, which is indebted to Anbal Quijanos theorizations of modernity and the
coloniality of power.11 There are subtle but important differences in their accounts
of the relation between modernity and coloniality that are necessary to have in mind
11. Walter Mignolo, Jos de Acostas Historia natural y moral de las Indias: Occidentalism,
the Modern/Colonial World, and the Colonial Difference, in Natural and Moral History
of the Indies by Jos de Acosta (Durham: Duke University Press, 2002), 451-518; Anbal
Quijano, Coloniality of Power, Eurocentrism, and Latin America, Nepantla: Views from
South 1, no. 3 (2000); Anbal Quijano, Modernity, Identity, and Utopia in Latin America,
116
when the term is used. While for Mignolo coloniality is modernitys constitutive
darker side, for Quijano modernity is an ambiguous formation that included
coloniality as a founding moment but that also gave expression to legitimate human
demands for individual freedom. Thus Quijano is hesitant, if not resistant, to the
idea of joining together modernity and coloniality in a single expression. Mignolo
does not necessarily oppose the idea that modernity contains positive elements that
cannot be reduced to coloniality, but he sees in the very concept of the modern an
idea that inevitably makes reference to the colonization of time.12 Thus, while it may
be true that there are aspects of modernity that escape the logic of coloniality, such
recognition does not do away with the inherent colonial aspect of the term. This
leads Mignolo to talk about alternatives to modernity, rather than simply alternative
modernities. Quijano would insist on his part that ideas such as individual freedom
and the socialization of power must be conceived as universal human achievements
or imperatives that are not to be diffused by appeals to the geopolitics of knowledge
or diversality.13 It is an open question whether Mignolos concept of diversality
and the geopolitics of knowledge as well as his critique of abstract universals can
or cannot accommodate the universalistic grain of Quijanos claims, or whether
Quijanos appeal to universality collapses into the problematic dimensions of abstract
universals. To be sure, a systematic and more complete elucidation of these issues
requires a more ample space.14
My use of modernity/coloniality here refers mainly to the idea that it is necessary

to always historicize and theorize modernity with the concept of coloniality in mind.
This leaves open the question about the exact extent of modernitys achievements or
failures. Seen in this light, decolonization refers to the task of building an alternative
world to modernity, without simply falling back into many of the ideas and practices
that are now regarded, even if problematically, as premodern. Decolonization also
makes reference to the construction of a new horizon of meaning which includes
new conceptions about the human being and material relations that do not conform
to the dictatorship of capital, and that are not limited by the empire of law in the
modern/colonial nation-state form. Decolonization, in short, is the comprehensive
process that seeks to dismantle the coloniality of power. It is best understood, as
Chela Sandoval and Catherine Walsh have suggested in different contexts, as decoloniality.15 By decoloniality it is meant here the dismantling of relations of power
and conceptions of knowledge that foment the reproduction of racial, gender, and
geo-political hierarchies that came into being or found new and more powerful
forms of expression in the modern/colonial world.
Csaires Discourse on Colonialism is central to the project of decoloniality. It
is a critical reflection on the European civilization project that gives expression to
the disenchantment with European modernity that began to be felt in many places
after the Second World War.16 The Discourse is an indictment of Europe and a
rejection of its racist and imperial ways. His critique is not without precedents.
Csaire questions Eurocentrism and the racism of the modern episteme as or more
strongly than Ren Descartes questioned the criteria of rationality sustained by the
Church throughout the Middle Ages and early modernity up until the seventeenth
century. Csaire also takes discourses on colonialism to a new level. Critiques of
coloniality have been as old as coloniality itself. They first showed themselves in
the cries of despair of subjects who lost their lives or observed the expansion of
the modern/colonial system in early modernity. From despair and cries, the skepticism
of the modern/colonial project turned into the idea of decolonization, which
presupposed the possibility of achieving some kind of independence. The idea of
decolonization was nurtured during the first moment of decolonization from the
end of the eighteenth to the first half of the nineteenth century. The first wave of
in The Postmodernism Debate in Latin America, ed. John Beverly, Michael Arona, and
Jos Oviedo (Durham: Duke University Press, 1995).
12. Mignolo, Jos de Acostas Historia natural y moral de las Indias, 451-518.
13. Walter Mignolo, The Geopolitics of Knowledge and the Colonial Difference, South
Atlantic Quarterly 101, no. 1 (2002): 57-96; Walter Mignolo, Local Histories/Global
Designs: Coloniality, Subaltern Knowledges, and Border Thinking (Princeton, NJ: Princeton
University Press, 2000); Walter Mignolo, Os esplendores e as misrias da scincia:
colonialidade, geopoltica do conhecimento e pluri-versalidade epistmica, in Conhecimento
Prudente para uma Vida Decente: Um Discurso sobre as Cincias revistado, ed. Boaventura
de Sousa Santos (Edies Afrontamento, 2003), 667-709.
14. For articulations of different aspects of this tension see Ramn Grosfoguel, Subaltern
Epistemologies, Decolonial Imaginaries and the Redefinition of Global Capitalism,
Review 28 (forthcoming 2005); Maldonado-Torres, Post-imperial Reflections on Crisis,
Knowledge, and Utopia. To be sure, these and related issues have emerged and been
discussed in the Modernity/Coloniality Research Group. The Modernity/Coloniality
Research Group is a network of scholars working primarily, but not only, in the United States
and Latin America whose work focuses on the redefinition and intersections between
critical theory and decolonization, world-system analysis and ethnic studies, liberation
thought and subaltern knowledges. They include Manuela Boatca (Rumania/Germany),
Santiago Castro-Gmez (Colombia), Enrique Dussel (Mexico), Arturo Escobar (Colombia/
U.S.A), Angela Figueiredo (Brazil), Oscar Guardiola (Colombia/England), Ramn Grosfoguel (Puerto Rico/U.S.A.), Edizn Len (Ecuador), Madina Tlostanova (Russia), Nelson
Maldonado-Torres (Puerto Rico/U.S.A.), Walter Mignolo (Argentina/U.S.A.), Anibal Quijano
(Peru), Jos David Saldvar (U.S.A.), Catherine Walsh (U.S.A./Ecuador), among others.
117
15. Chela Sandoval, Methodology of the Oppressed (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota

Press, 2000); Catherine Walsh, Interculturality and the Coloniality of Power: An Other
Thinking and Positioning from the Colonial Difference, in Coloniality, Transmodernity,
and Border Thinking, ed. Ramn Grosfoguel, Nelson Maldonado-Torres, and Jos David
Saldvar (forthcoming), n.p.
16. I take the notion of disenchantment from Sylvia Wynter, On Disenchanting Discourse:
Minority Literary Criticism and Beyond, in The Nature and Context of Minority
Discourse (New York: Oxford University Press, 1990), 432-69.
118
decolonization was critical of imperialism but not so much of racism, and thus,
of the coloniality of power. It was also still for the most part enchanted with
Europe or with ideas of progress that had emanated from Europe. What I call here
the project of decolonization emerges when the critique of racism intensifies, the
absolute goodness of the nation-state form is put in question, the disenchantment
with Europe becomes strong, and the question of postcolonial agency acquires
global relevance.17 This occurs at the point where the end of the most devastating
war in the twentieth century coincides with the beginning of liberation struggles in
European colonies throughout many places in Asia and Africa.
The project of decolonization represents a third pathway among the intellectual
and ideological options that became more prominent after the Second World War.18
The first two political and ideological pathways were defined by the new geopolitical
powers that took a protagonist role during the war. On the one hand, there was the
United States, which had already become an international force after the expansion
of its territory beyond the original thirteen colonies, the war with Mexico, and the
Hispanic-American war. The United States would come to assist as well as to displace
northern Europe as a fundamental geo-political axis of world-systemic forces. With
this displacement, Americanism is introduced into the world as a triumphalist and
assimilationist ideology. Americanism had already entered the scene at the end of the
nineteenth century with Roosevelt. It worked then as an ideology that dictated the
terms of the assimilation of European immigrants, particularly Catholic and nonChristian, some of whom were regarded as people of dark skin.19 Americanism took
new shapes with McCarthyism and today finds new forms of expression in reactions
to foreign threats that include the war on terror and the hysteria about Mexican
immigration, as manifested in writings such as those of Samuel P. Huntington.20 To
be sure, Americanism has never entirely reconciled itself with other subjects, such
as indigenous peoples and blacks in the United States, who in some way represent
constitutively sub-altern or racial components of the American nation.
The second historical door or pathway that opened after the fall of Europe in
the Second World War is that of communism. Communism represented for many a
viable option for a different future from those offered by fascism, European liberalism,
or U.S. Americanism. The Cold War put Soviet communism and Americanism
at the center, with some other related projects as satellites. Europe itself became
physically and ideologically divided between these two spheres of influence, while
former European colonies attempted to negotiate or steal spaces of freedom to
forge alternative projects or at least political formations that allow them to enjoy
some autonomy. Some of these projects were defined by neocolonial elites in the
former colonies and others by ultra-conservative anti-Western sectors. But there
also emerged a sophisticated anti-colonial discourse that raised itself beyond ressentimment while it also offered new grammars to do critique and new ideas to forge
a post-Eurocentric future that also overcomes the limits of modernity/coloniality.
This is what I am referring to as the third historical pathway that opens up in the
twentieth century. Csaires Discourse on Colonialism is one of the key texts that
put forward this type of discourse. To be sure, we also find many figures and texts
who might be located in two or more projects simultaneously.
In sum, if, as Wallerstein argues, the distinctive ideologies of modernity after the
French Revolution were conservatism, liberalism, and Marxism, the Second World
War would bring to visibility particular expressions of these ideologies, now forged
primarily outside of the European continent. European liberalisms sphere of influence
subsides and U.S. American liberalism dominates. Different from European liberalism
particularly French liberalismU.S. American liberalism tends to reconcile itself with
religion, and particularly with Christian Protestantism, more easily. Marxism gives
way primarily to Soviet communism, which was deeply anti-religious, with aspirations of empire building. Conservatism in this context became primarily the view of
those who wanted to hold on to a picture of the world as dominated by Europe or by
an European nation, as was the case with intellectuals such as Martin Heidegger who
adopted strong forms of Germancentrism after his complicity with fascism.21 In more
general terms, Eurocentrism itself became the new conservatism, since it continued
to affirm European centrality in a world that no longer had faith in Europe and that
was gradually moving beyond the European Age. Indeed, Eurocentrism represents
today a similar option to that taken by those who defended a Christian-centered
view of the world after Copernicus had defied Christian cosmology, after Columbus
had broken with classical and Christian geography, and after Descartes offered a
17. For different theorizations on the project of decolonization see, among others, Ramn
Grosfoguel, Subaltern Epistemologies, Decolonial Imaginaries and the Redefinition of
Global Capitalism; Ramn Grosfoguel, Nelson Maldonado-Torres, and Jos David
Saldvar, eds., Latin@s in the World System: Decolonization Struggles in the 21st Century
U.S. Empire (Boulder, CO: Paradigm Press, 2005); Nelson Maldonado-Torres, Philosophical
Interventions in the Unfinished Project of Decolonization, South Atlantic Quarterly
(forthcoming); Mignolo, Local Histories/Global Designs; Walter Mignolo, The Zapatistass
Theoretical Revolution: Its Historical, Ethical, and Political Consequences, Review 25,
no. 3 (2002): 245-75; Catherine Walsh, ed., Pensamiento crtico y matriz (de)colonial: reflexiones latinoamericanas (Quito, Ec.: Editorial Universidad Andina Simn Bolivar, 2005).
18. See Maldonado-Torres, Philosophical Interventions in the Unfinished Project of Decolonization.
19. I owe Shimberlee Jirn-King references on this point.
20. Samuel P. Huntington, Who are We? The Challenges to Americas National Identity (New
York: Simon & Schuster, 2004).
119
21. Nelson Maldonado-Torres, The Topology of Being and the Geopolitics of Knowledge:
Modernity, Empire, Coloniality, City 8, no. 1 (2004): 29-56.
120
new epistemology. 22 At least this is how it appears after reading Csaires Discourse
on Colonialism and the influential book of his once student, Frantz Fanons The
Wretched of the Earth. The same can be said, if we follow Sylvia Wynter, of much of
what often passes as minority literature.23 But from the perspective introduced by
these texts conservatism can hardly be said to appear only in Eurocentric ventures.
Conservatism also transpires in U.S. American liberalism, which tends to valorize the
world through religious themes (such as Manifest Destiny), the perversity of which
has already been more than historically tested. As problematic as European liberalism
may be, U.S. American liberalism undoes some of its victories. The same occurred
with Soviet Communism. But all of them appear to be in some measure conservative
when compared with the project of decolonization. In short, while liberalism, Marxism,
and decolonization projects left conservatism to some extent by the wayside in the
Cold War, conservatism gradually came back strongly not only as a separate or distinct ideology, but in the form of the Eurocentrism of liberals and Marxists who resist
decolonization. Conservative republicanisms and a liberal form of conservatism have
become the strongest ideologies after the Cold War.
The fall of Europe in and after the Second World War makes possible the opening
of a new historical horizon, that of decoloniality, which, as Fanon put it, is the path
of the condemned of the earth. If modern philosophy began in the Caribbean, as
Enrique Dussel suggests, it is possible to say that transmodern decolonial philosophy
also finds a strong anchor in the Caribbean.24 Csaires Discourse and Fanons
Wretched of the Earth, along with Black Skin, White Masks are the primary representatives. The pathway of decoloniality that I wish to highlight here is opened in
a definitive form with the combination of the internal and the external devastation
of Europe, that is, not only by the racist and genocidal force of Nazism within but
also by the hopeful force of decolonization in many of the colonial territories. Con-
trary to the decolonization struggles in Latin America throughout the nineteenth

century, which remained fascinated with Europe or northern countries (primarily
France and the United States; Haiti is an exception to what appears as a rule here25),
the second wave of decolonization took place at a point when Europe was indefensible, as Csaire puts it in the Discourse.26 Thus the newly (dependent) nations as
well as the territories that had already obtained their formal independence in the late
eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, suddenly found themselves in a context where
Eurocentrism rose more suspicion than enchantment. The new door that opens up
after the Second World War is that of the disenchantment with Eurocentrism and a
renewed affirmation of decoloniality as a project. This is also where the decolonial
turn emerges as a widely shared epistemic perspective among many third-world
thinkers. One can trace it, for instance, from Csaire and Fanon in the Caribbean,
Europe, and North Africa, to Enrique Dussels Philosophy of Liberation (1985) in
Latin America, to Linda Tuhiwai Smith in her Decolonizing Methodologies (1999)
in New Zealand, and to Chela Sandovals Methodology of the Oppressed (2000) in
the United States, among other locales.27 The list of precursors is also ample, including
W.E.B. Du Bois and the Pan-African movement, intellectuals of the Haitian revolution, Guaman Poma de Ayala and other indigenous intellectuals in the Americas and
elsewhere for more than five hundred years now, and others in Africa, Asia, and the
Americas.
The disenchantment, not simply with tradition largely defined or with religion,
as Weber would accentuate in regards to what he perceived as the progressive
historical development of Europe, but with Eurocentrism or the myth of modernity
itself, became a central component of the second wave of decolonization.28 The fall
of Europe was a symptom of a larger crisis of the world-system as a whole, which
made visible the ways in which colonial structures still defined geo-political relations,
even in places that had obtained independence. From here the suspicion or disenchantment with Eurocentrism began to propagate rapidly in different spaces in
22. Sylvia Wynter, 1492: A New World View, in Race, Discourse, and the Origin of the
Americas: A New World View, ed. Vera Lawrence Hyatt and Rex Nettleford (Washington,
D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1995); Sylvia Wynter, Columbus and the Poetics of
the Propter Nos, Annals of Scholarship 8, no. 2 (1991): 251-86.
23. Sylvia Wynter, On Disenchanting Discourse.
24. For an elucidation of the concept of transmodernity, see Enrique Dussel, Modernity,
Eurocentrism, and Trans-Modernity: In Dialogue with Charles Taylor, in The Underside
of Modernity: Apel, Ricoeur, Rorty, Taylor, and the Philosophy of Liberation, ed. Eduardo
Mendieta (Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities, 1996), 129-59; Enrique Dussel, Postmodernidad y transmodernidad: dilogos con la filosofa de Gianni Vattimo (Puebla, Mex.:
Universidad Iberoamericana, Golfo Centro; Instituto Tecnolgico y de Estudios Superiores de Occidente; Universidad Iberoamericana, Plantel Laguna, 1999); Enrique Dussel,
World System and Trans-Modernity, trans. Alessandro Fornazzari, Nepantla: Views
from South 3, no. 2 (2002): 221-44. For his conception of the origins of modern philosophy,
see Enrique Dussel, Origen de la filosofa poltica moderna: Las Casas, Vitoria y Suarez
(1514-1617), Caribbean Studies 33, no. 2 (2005): 35-80.
121
25. See, for instance, Sibylle Fischer, Modernity Disavowed: Haiti and the Cultures of Slavery
in the Age of Revolution (Durham: Duke University Press, 2004).
26. Csaire, Discourse on Colonialism, 9.
27. Enrique Dussel, Philosophy of Liberation, trans. Aquilina Martinez and Christine
Morkovsky (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 1985); Sandoval, Methodology of the Oppressed; Linda Tuhiwai Smith, Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous
Peoples (New York: Zed Books, 1999). Even though Fanon has been much more influential
than Csaire, the influence of Csaire cannot be overestimated. Chela Sandoval has told
me in conversation, for instance, that the first decolonial book that she read was Csaires
Discourse on Colonialism.
28. For an elaboration of the myth of modernity, see Enrique Dussel, The Invention of the
Americas: Eclipse of the Other and the Myth of Modernity, trans. Michael D. Barber
(New York: Continuum, 1995).
122
the second half of the twentieth century, including Europe and the United States
themselves.29
Western modernity, which Enrique Dussel refers to as trans-modern.34 The project of

decolonization also implies that Europe has been called from the very beginning of
the modern/colonial project to abandon its imperialist posture and to adopt a different
historical project. That is to say, the project of decolonization is not only different
from that of European modernity, but it also confronts modernity with a series of
ethical, political, and intellectual imperatives. Decolonization has the character of
denunciation and demand. Its viability, however, does not rest on their recognition.
These different dimensions of the project of decolonization appear in Discourse on
Colonialism.
As suggested previously, Csaires Discourse on Colonialism and Frantz Fanons
The Wretched of the Earth are perhaps the texts which most clearly and strongly
articulated the third path that opened up after the war. They were written with full
awareness of the new world dynamics that began to unfold after the Second World
War. Both aim to understand the world that began to emerge from the perspective of
groups that suffered constant and consistent exclusion throughout modernity. They
referred to them as the wretched or condemned. Csaires Discourse focuses on the
understanding of the crisis of Europe and the possibilities that began to open after its
fall. Fanons Wretched of the Earth focused more on the struggles and possibilities of
colonized peoples as they began to claim independence from Europe.
My main thesis here is that Discourse on Colonialism should be read as a
response from the colonized world, and particularly from the perspective of the
African diaspora, to the European modern civilization project, which finds one of its
strongest roots in the philosophy of Ren Descartes. In his Discourse, Csaire takes
a variety of postures that go from internal critique and subversive complicity to
the introduction of new critical perspectives beyond the European interpretive and
epistemological framework.35 Csaire deploys a complex rhetorical arsenal in his
diagnosis and indictment of European Man.36
II. Discourse on Colonialism, the Crisis of Europe, and

the Third Path of Decolonization or Decolonial Turn
What I call the third way, that of decolonization, transmodernity, and pluriversality, is
not parallel or equivalent to the other two pathways that opened up after the Second
World War.30 Americanism and communism are more recent historical projects and
are less ambitious than the project of decolonization. Americanism has its founding
moment in 1776, and communism is grounded on modern ideologies that were born
out of the European Enlightenment. The project of decolonization, on the other
hand, has been articulated in different ways since the very beginning of the European
expansion in the Americas.31 Americanism and communism are also more limited
than the project of decolonization because they are delimited by modernity. That is,
they are expressions of modernitys ideologies: conservatism, liberalism, and Marxism.32
The project of decolonization represents a spatial rupture with modernity.33 This
does not mean that the project of decolonization is necessarily anti-liberal or antiMarxist, or that it could dispense of elements from them. What it means is, first,
that the bases for the project of decolonization precede the European Enlightenment,
and, second, that it subsumes modern ideas in the effort to produce alternatives to
29. In the United States there were theories of internal colonialism and decolonial
proposals by women of color. See, among others, Robert Allen, Black Awakening in
Capitalist America (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1969); Mario Barrera, Race and Class
in the Southwest: A Theory of Racial Inequality (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame
Press, 1979); Robert Blauner, Racial Oppression in America (New York: Harper & Row,
1972); Alma M. Garca, ed., Chicana Feminist Thought: The Basic Historical Writings
(New York and London: Routledge, 1997); Cherre Moraga and Gloria Anzalda, ed.,
This Bridge Called My Back: Writings by Radical Women of Color, 2nd ed. (New York:
Kitchen Table: Women of Color Press, 1983).
30. For an elaboration of transmodernity, see Dussel, World System and Trans-Modernity,
221-44. For pluriversality, see Mignolo, Local Histories/Global Designs.
31. Rolena Adorno, Cronista y principe: la obra de don Felipe de Guamn Poma de Ayala
(Lima, Peru: Pontificia Universidad Catlica del Per, 1989); Dussel, The Invention of the
Americas; Walter Mignolo, The Darker Side of the Renaissance: Literacy, Territoriality,
and Colonization, 2nd ed. (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2003).
32. Immanuel Wallerstein, Unthinking Social Science: The Limits of Nineteenth-Century
Paradigms (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991).
33. Walter Mignolo, Globalization and the Geopolitics of Knowledge: The Role of the
Humanities in the Corporate University, Nepantla: Views from South 4, no. 1 (2003):
97-119.
123
34. Enrique Dussel, Etica de la liberacin en la edad de la globalizacin y de la exclusin

(Madrid: Editorial Trotta; Mxico, D.F.: Universidad Autnoma MetropolitanaIztapalapa, and Universidad Nacional Autnoma de Mxico, 1998); Mignolo, Local Histories/
Global Designs.
35. The concept of subversive complicity appears in Ramn Grosfoguel, The Divorce of
Nationalist Discourses from the Puerto Rican People: A Sociohistorical Perspective, in
Puerto Rican Jam: Rethinking Colonialism and Nationalism, ed. Frances Negrn-Muntaner
and Ramn Grosfoguel (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1997), 57-76.
36. With European Man I refer to an ideal of European humanity, which is closely tied to its
difference with colonized sub-humanity. It also denotes a strong masculinist bias in favor of
conceptions of self and civilization that fit ideals of manliness. I distinguish European Man
from Europeans in that while the former refers to an idea, the latter refers to European
people as such, whose self-conception has been informed by the ideal but who can identify
or not identify with it in different respects.
124
With his reflections on the crisis of Europe, Csaire joined a wide and diverse
group of thinkers who diagnose Europe and who aim to articulate responses to
it. Many of these European theorists took Descartes philosophy as a point of reference. I have referred to Husserl and Heidegger already, but one can add Sartre,
Freud or Lacan as well, among many others. They interpreted the crisis of Europe
as the result of a departure from Cartesianism, or else as the contrary, that is, as
the expression of an inability to break away from Descartes. They thus attempted
to provide a new view of the subject and of knowledge, and a new methodology,
philosophical perspective, or science, beyond the Cartesian or Newtonian sciences.
Of the different European voices trying to provide a new orientation for thought it
was undoubtedly Jean-Paul Sartre who took most seriously questions and ideas that
emerged in the colonial world. But even Sartre failed to note the extent of radicality in
the proposals of such figures. From here we see the need of attention to Csaire and
others as philosophers or theorists in their own right, which includes analyzing the
extent to which intellectuals from the periphery, and not only those from Europe,
were critically and originally engaging the Cartesian legacy and other foundations
of modern Western thought.
Csaire writes at a point when the disenchantment with Europe accelerates. He
offers the first sustained diagnosis and critique of Europe at a point where the crisis
of Europe looked more like its very end. And this becomes for him and others a
new point of departure for critique. While in the nineteenth century it was believed
that critique finds its starting point in the critical assessment of religionindeed for
Marx, with its very endCsaires text makes the point that critique in the second
half of the twentieth century can only begin with the critique of Europe. It also seems
to follow from his text that just as Europe had to pass through the disenchantment
with religion in order to access modernity, the world (including Europe) has to pass
through the disenchantment with Europe in order to aspire to what Enrique Dussel
calls transmodernity.37 This remains a goal fifty years after Csaire wrote his Discourse.
But this should cause no surprise. Just as many religions have the capacity to survive
even after they have shown to be decrepit, Eurocentrism will keep its priests and
mausoleums for some time. The realization of its bankruptcy will be gradual and
not by any means immediate. At the end of it all Csaires Discourse will still be
waiting for us.
in Europe, but rather the more general issue that European civilization has been
unable to solve the problems that it creates. The main problems that he has in mind
are the proletariat and the colonial problem. The problem of the proletariat is very
present in Europe, and is thus taken seriously by many as a problem. But the problem
of colonialism hardly emerges as a problem, at least in the sense of being itself a
problem rather than the problem being the colonized peoples themselves. In this,
Csaire demonstrates one of the central features of the decolonial attitude: the problem
is located in the structures, not the people.38 This move is characteristic of a critical
attitude in general. What makes it decolonial is that the people in question are
not even considered to be people under the racial/colonial lenses.39 That is, they
are racialized subjects who inhabit the world of superfluous visibility.40 In regard to
these subjects the shift of perspective that leads to critique requires a more radical
turn. Here the European tradition of critical theory usually finds limits.
A clear expression of the decolonial attitude is Csaires resistance to subordinate the question of the proletariat to the colonial problem. The colonial
problem raises for him specific questions and requires an exploration of its own
which includes reference to capitalism, but which is not reducible to economics,
class struggle, or exploitation. He rather points to the specificity of colonial and
racial domination. Csaire, however, does not proceed in this text to show the
connections between world capitalism and race or colonialism. He focuses on the
connections between fascism and the colonial experience. Csaire uses drastic but
legitimate means to bring to consciousness to the European the harsh gravity of
the colonial problem. This is a decolonial strategy. Once the master recognizes
as a principle the gravity of something that has affected him, the colonized uses
those principles or those evidences in order to bring the master to the awareness
of gravities that he did not even want to see. This is not always a mere strategy.
In some cases, as in Csaires, the colonized has more complex and convincing
articulations of those principles than the master himself has. Gaining the masters
recognition about some evil not only serves the practical goals of gaining degrees
of freedom. It also serves the theoretical task of educating him about ethics and
reason. Here the practical and the theoretical are entangled without being entirely
reducible to each other.
Discourse on Colonialism is written in poetic prose, but the style is very different
from Csaires poems, which follow the surrealist trend of the time. Surrealism was
III. Discourse on Colonialism and the Crisis of Europe

Csaire opens up the Discourse on Colonialism describing Europe as a decadent
civilization. In this statement, Csaire not only has in mind the proliferation of fascism
37. Dussel, World System and Trans-Modernity, 221-44.
125
38. See Maldonado-Torres, Decolonization and the New Identitarian Logics after September 11.
39. Nelson Maldonado-Torres, Against War: Views from the Underside of Modernity
(Durham: Duke University Press, forthcoming).
40. Lewis R. Gordon, Existential Dynamics of Theorizing Black Invisibility, in Existence
in Black: An Anthology of Black Existential Philosophy, ed. Lewis R.Gordon (New York:
Routledge, 1997), 69-79.
126
characterized by employing unconscious forces and pre-rational elements in order to

debunk the attempt to reduce the psyche and our experience of the world in rationalist
formulas. As Robin Kelley points out, surrealism was an extension of [Csaires]
search for a new black subjectivity.41 Csaire makes very illuminating comments in
this regard:
others, made their articulation possible. This reveals important levels of continuity
and collaboration in the larger and collective project of decolonization.
While Csaires poetic and surrealist vein put him closer to Heidegger than to
Husserls project, the Discourse on Colonialism is definitely closer to Husserl. In
his Cartesian Meditations, Husserl attempted to provide a response to the crisis
of modernity through the transformation of Cartesian thought.44 Discourse on
Colonialism can be seen as an effort in the same direction, but it decisively breaks
from Cartesianism as well. While Descartes and Husserl attempt to establish or
reformulate the basis of the European historical project through the centrality of the
subject and the epistemic value of clarity and distinction (or phenomenological
intuition in Husserls case), Csaire aims to introduce a new type of critical reason
which rests on the clarity that colonized subjects have of the perversity of the
European civilization project. Lets see this carefully.
There are clear parallels between Csaires Discourse on Colonialism and
Descartes Discourse on Method. Both are brief texts divided in six sections. It is
almost as if Csaire was emulating Descartes, responding to him, or trying to write
a new Discourse for a new historical project. The brevity of both texts is explained
by their focus on the most basic aspects of the scientific attitude. That is, they aim
to provide new perspectives about basic philosophical principles. Both focus on
impediments to the search for truth. But they highlight different forms of deception.
Descartes focuses on the deception of the senses, tradition, and assumed certainties,
while Csaire focuses on the deception of those who, after apparently following
Descartes method, believe not to be deceived but deceive themselves nonetheless
in regard to what is most fundamental: themselves and their relations with others.
Otherwise put, in Discourse on Colonialism, Csaire aims to elucidate the dark side
of the deception and self-deception that Descartes attempted to exorcize in
his Discourse on Method. He also provides ideas about correcting these evils and
falsehoods through decolonization. Csaires Discourse, thus, like Descartes, is a
discourse on method. It is a discourse on decolonial methodology, on how to achieve
and maintain a decolonial consciousness and a decolonial attitude.
Discourse on Colonialism is premised on the fact that Europe is unable to
justify itself either before the bar of reason or before the bar of conscience; and
that, increasingly, it takes refuge in a hypocrisy which is all the more odious because
it is less and less likely to deceive.45 It is clear here that for Csaire Europe took the
role in modernity of a failed evil demon of sorts who could no longer, after the war,
deceive others about the grandiosity of its civilization or about the alleged obviousness
Well then, if I apply the surrealist approach to my particular situation,

I can summon up these unconscious forces. This, for me, was a call to
Africa. I said to myself: its true that superficially we are French, we
bear the marks of French customs; we have been branded by Cartesian
philosophy, by French rhetoric; but if we break with all that, if we
plumb the depths, then what we will find is fundamentally black.42
Csaires poems are written in the surrealist vein, which he infuses with ngritude.
Discourse on Colonialism, written only a few years after the Second World War, uses
different rhetorical devices. His narrative takes more sober, argumentative, and rational
tones. Moreover, Csaire focuses on Europe, not black subjectivity. By no means
does this represent an inconsistency or betrayal to his surrealist intuitions. Surrealism
allowed Csaire, among other things, to undermine the bases of Cartesianism. In this,
Csaire somewhat approached Heidegger and others who found in poetry important
ingredients to overcome the limits of Cartesianism. But while Heidegger searched
for European roots in Greece and Germany, Csaire was trying to establish an intimate connection with Africa. Csaire, however, was not tied to African roots. While
ngritude took him away from Europe, his Marxist commitments and his view of
the structural conditions of colonization led him far from relying solely on cultural
politics. It would be a mistake, though, to reduce Csaires political commitments
to Marxism. It was not only the problem of the proletariat that he addressed, but
also the colonial and racial problem. And he did not think that one could be reduced
to the other. As I pointed out before, Csaire does not spell out the relationship
between these two. This work will be done later on by figures such as Peruvian
sociologist Anbal Quijano.43 Quijanos theorization of capitalist exploitation and racial
domination, along with their impact on spheres of power in society such as control
of sex, knowledge, labor, and authority marks a higher level in the understanding of
modernity and capitalism. Csaire did not articulate these ideas, but he, along with
41. Robin D.G. Kelly, Poetry and the Political Imagination: Aim Csaire, Negritude, and
the Applications of Surrealism, 2001; http://www.lipmagazine.org/articles/featkelley_116.
shtml [visited: September 9, 2006].
43. Anbal Quijano, Colonialidad del poder y clasificacin social, Journal of World-Systems
Research XI, no. 2 (2000): 342-86; Anbal Quijano, Colonialidad y modernidad/racionalidad, Per indgena 29 (1991): 11-20; Quijano, Coloniality of Power, Eurocentrism,
and Latin America, 533-80.
127
44. Edmund Husserl, Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology, trans.

Dorion Cairns (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1960).
45. Csaire, Discourse on Colonialism, 9, italics mine.
128
of the racial, sexual, religious, and geo-political categories that were so instrumental
for its hegemony. This bar of reason, on the other hand, is not a privileged epistemic
subject, but an intersubjective community: the whole world. The devastation of the
Second World War and the Holocaust showed very clearly the bankruptcy of Europe
to the world. On the one hand, there was the United States. Csaire comments that
the United States opinion of Europe was not necessarily wrong but that it clearly
reflected its own interests for supremacy. That is, the critique by the United States
served its own interests for hegemony. Csaire knew, as did so many others in the
U.S. southwest and Latin America, and some in Europe, that the United States were
a menace to Europe and the world. Csaire also knew that Europeans might be
tempted to respond to the situation by holding on to their roots with more determination. From Husserl and Heidegger at the beginning of the twentieth century, to
Habermas and Derrida more recently, we find the repeated gesture of searching for
European roots as a response to its crisis.46 Some Europeans continue to believe
that the door of Eurocentrism is still open, or is a lived possibility. To be fair to these
efforts, it must be said that Eurocentric epistemologies still dictate to a great extent
recognized ways of thinking and critique.47 But conscious adherence to Eurocentric
projects is quite different from opposing Eurocentrism while nonetheless collapsing into it. Csaires judgment of the former is unforgiving. He considers them to
be hypocrites who lie to themselves and who aim to hide what has appeared with
clarity and distinctness to everyone: Europes perversity.
Csaire accuses Europeans for attempting to hide from themselves by different
means knowledge about the reality and character of European civilization. That is,
Europe has not only deceived the world but also itself. Csaires Discourse aims to
elucidate the nature of the deception and self-deception in question.
Like Descartes, Csaire knows that deception leads humans away from the truth
and the achievement of true science, but he adds to this that the European form of
self-deception is also homicidal.49 While Europe, through the Eurocentrism endemic
to European modernity, took the role of deceiving others, and thus of becoming
an evil demon of sorts, Europe itself, Csaire notes, has its own demon or agent of
deception. This is Hitler himself. And Hitler showed himself as an effective agent
of European thought and action long before fascism existed. Hitler was already
present in Europes mind since the times of colonization and systematic racism in
modernity. Like many of Hitlers victims, colonized and racialized subjects have
suffered extermination, genocide, enslavement, and violence for centuries. Hitler
is, in short, the name that Csaire uses to refer in retrospect to the European evil
demon that has deceived Europe and led it to create and sustain the color-line which
is a most fundamental source of its own identity and historical agency.50 Hitler
precedes fascism but also survives it. European humanists and the Christian bourgeoisie
itself, according to Csaire, continue to be duped by Hitler. Their critiques of
the historical Hitler rely on their unshakable commitment with Hitler, the internal
demon of European consciousness. Thus, their critique is inconsistent as it presupposes a commitment with that which they allegedly criticize. Critiques of the
crime and humiliation of man are critiques of the use of colonial violence toward
the typical colonizers, the Europeans. That is why Hitlers crime is unforgivable.
And that is also why he must be denounced, but only partially, as Hitler the demon
continues to define the terms of such critique, and thus, of its outcome. Following
this very logic, it could be said that while fascism was preceded by colonialism it
continues to persist through the coloniality of power and the continued production
of what W.E.B. DuBois referred to as the color-line. But European Man in many
ways continues to be deceived about itself and those realities.
The emergence and spread of fascism in Europe along with its tragic consequences
made it impossible for the European to hide some truths about his civilization. Yet
European Man has for the most part remained blind in the face of the reality of the
colonized, and has thus failed to know more about himself. The slave, however,
has known about the perversity and the inconsistency of the master for centuries.
Csaire points out in the Discourse that the slaves know that their masters lie
(to themselves and the slaves) and that, inasmuch as they hide from themselves a
truth about themselves, they are weak. This is particularly true after the collapse
of Europe in the Second World War. The slaves and the colonized people appear in
Yes, it would be worthwhile to study clinically, in detail, the steps

taken by Hitler and Hitlerism and to reveal to the very distinguished,
very humanistic, very Christian bourgeois of the twentieth century
that without his being aware of it, he has a Hitler inside him, that
Hitler inhabits him, that Hitler is his demon, that if he rails against
he is being inconsistent and that, at bottom, what he cannot forgive
Hitler for is not crime in itself, the crime against man, it is not the
humiliation of man as such, it is the crime against the white man, the
humiliation of the white man, and the fact that he applied to Europe
colonialist procedures which until then had been reserved exclusively for
the Arabs of Algeria, the coolies of India, and the blacks of Africa.48
46. Habermas and Derrida, February 15, or, What Binds Europeans Together.
47. Quijano, Coloniality of Power, Eurocentrism, and Latin America.
129
49. Ren Descartes, Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy, ed. David
Weissman (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1996), 21.
50. On the idea of the color-line, see W.E.B. Du Bois, The Souls of Black Folk (New York: The
New American Library; London: The New English Library, 1969).
130
the Discourse on Colonialism as a necessary epistemic source for Europe to achieve

clear and distinct ideas about its identity and the character of its historical
project. Their failure to take the colonized seriously as a subject of knowledge meant
at the same time a betrayal of the Cartesianism to which they were allegedly committed. Lies, more than clarity and distinctness, were central aspects of the
European project.
To be sure, the knowledge that enslaved and colonized subjects have, while
clear and distinct, was not necessarily achieved by a rigorous Cartesian method.
Descartes method rested on hyperbolic doubt. He imagined an evil demon who
played with the epistemological powers and the sensorial capabilities and who
deceived people about their most fundamental convictions. The condemned did
not need to imagine an evil demon in order to know the truth about European Man.
The violence of the master was enough for that. Or else, as I indicated previously,
Europe itself appears as an evil demon of sorts in Csaires text. Now, its evil
character not only shows in deceit, but also in the propagation of violence and death
as well as in the naturalization of the institutions, ideas, and practices that perpetuate
social death and colonial violence.51 Instead of a process of methodic doubt, the
condemned went through a process of methodic suffering based on their alleged
lack of humanity. But the slaves knew themselves human. They also knew that the
master could only legitimate his conceptions and the violence that he perpetrated
through a process of methodic and brutal self-imposed blindness, facilitated by the
dominant symbolic structure. The masters hide from themselves knowledge about
the humanity of those whom they considered non-humans. The forgetfulness of the
humanity of the racialized and the colonized, rather than the forgetfulness of Being,
as Heidegger would have it, appeared to Csaire as the true crime and inconsistency
of Europe. This is bad faith in its most destructive expression.52
While Descartes Discourse on Method gave form and shape to the European
rationalist project and fomented a certain form of self-critique (process of doubt),
Discourse on Colonialism makes explicit the failure of the European commitment
to the Cartesian project while it also points to intrinsic problems with the Cartesian
approach itself. Even though Descartes attempted to articulate a solid ground for
reason, and thus to combat lies and deceit, he adopted a method that concealed the
epistemological relevance of the relation between master and slave, colonizer and
colonized. Descartes method is based on an internal dialogue whereby the subject
can arrive at the truth about itself and about the true nature of reason. Cartesian
individualism and his monological process of doubt leaves dialogue by the wayside
and puts obstacles to the flourishing of intersubjective reason. There is a different
route, which would consist in conceiving reason as dialogical and intersubjective
from the beginning. From that perspective, slavery and colonization, rather than
the tricks of an evil genius, would represent the highest betrayals of reason. The
perspective of the slave was more conducive to this kind of reflection than that of
the master. That is why we see in the periphery or the global third world continued
affirmation of ethics and politics as first philosophy. Csaires Discourse itself is a
manual to teach us the right kind of skepticism whose negative function (doubt) is
grounded on the ethical mode of reception of otherness and whose positive goal is
none other than love, understood as a force of social activism and a social formation
premised on the primacy of ethical human contact.53 This ground and this goal are
51. For an elucidation of social death, see Orlando Patterson, Slavery and Social Death: A
Comparative Study (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1982). For the links
between death and colonialism, see Maldonado-Torres, Against War.
52. Jean Paul-Sartre introduced the philosophical concept of bad faith with the intent to build
a critical theory out of the implications of the Cartesian cogito, as interpreted and reformulated by Husserl in his phenomenology; see Jean-Paul Sartre, Being and Nothingness:
A Phenomenological Essay on Ontology, trans. Hazel E. Barnes (New York: Washington
Square Press, Pocket Books, 1966). He also used it to examine anti-Semitism; see JeanPaul Sartre, Rflexions sur la question juive (Paris: Gallimard, [1944] 1954). Frantz Fanon
had it in mind when he elaborated his account of the lived experience of the black in
his Black Skin, White Masks, trans. Charles Lam Markmann (New York: Grove Press,
1968). Building on Sartre and Fanon, Lewis R. Gordon used the concept more recently to
examine anti-black racism, in Bad Faith and Antiblack Racism (Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press, 1995). Sartre is one of the European intellectuals most cited in the third
world. Like Boaventura de Sousa Santos today, Sartres theories not only traveled to
the South, but he also learned from the questions, theories, and perspectives that emerge
131
there. On Sartres indebtedness to third world intellectuals see, in this volume, George
Ciccariello Maher, The Internal Limits of the European Gaze: Intellectuals and the Colonial
Difference, Radical Philosophy Review 9, no. 2 (2006): 139-165. For a reading of Sartre
as a post-continental philosopher, see my contribution on Post-continental Philosophy to
the dossier of Worlds and Knowledges Otherwise (Vol. 1, dossier 3), http://www.jhfc.duke.
edu/wko/forthcoming.php [accessed September 14, 2006; forthcoming at http://www.jhfc.
duke.edu/wko/dossiers/1.3/contents.php].
53. It is no accident that Csaires Discourse was the first and one of the most powerful texts
on decolonization that the Chicana theorist Chela Sandoval, who offers an account of love
as a decolonial force in her Methodology of the Oppressed (2000), encountered (conversation
April 22, 2005). Sandovals Methodology of the Oppressed is directly inspired by the
writings of third world women of color in the United States and by theorists such as Frantz
Fanon, who, as I have mentioned already, studied Csaire carefully and who insisted on the
primacy of the self-other relation. Sandovals Methodology is a self-conscious effort to
elevate some of the insights on the decolonization of self, society, and knowledge to the level
of method, just as Csaire himself began to do in the Discourse. The Discourse, written in
the early years of the wave of decolonization in the twentieth century, focuses on the fundamentals of decolonization, as they were perceived by many in the periphery upon Europes
demise. It stands today, as before, as a propaedeutics to decolonial methodology as it also
continues to inspire new approaches. Csaire and Sandovals reflections on method and the
sciences, among those of Fanon, Sylvia Wynter, Lewis Gordon and others, form part of the
rich and complex genealogy of the decolonial turn.
132
basic ideas that appear in the third way of decolonization. They are also the most
fundamental elements of the decolonial turn.54 His dismissal or ignorance about this
type of reflection led Descartes not so much to conceal Being, but to make invisible
racialized and colonized subjects as well as to severely hinder the power of the
decolonial gift.
The decolonial gift refers in this case to the reason of the enslaved or the condemned. Csaire finds in the general character of this form of reason a fundamental
contribution to responses to the European crisis. The very existence of the slave may
be interpreted as a claim or exigency, or else, as a radical questioning of the decision
to maintain slavery.55 The blindness or lack of hospitality to the free gift of the slave is
not accidental. It is inherent to the colonial situation and to racial slavery. The notion
of damnation, that both Csaire and Fanon use to refer to the colonized, makes
reference to a situation where gifts are not received but taken before they are even
offered.56 Dispossession and possession take precedence over the logic of the gift. I
base this insight on the etymology of damn or condemned, which makes reference to
the French donner, which means to give.57 Damn refers to someone who cannot
give because her offerings have been taken from her. Both Csaire and Fanon understand colonization as a despojo or dispossession of the resources that subjects
and people count on to offer to others. The offering (la ofrenda) enacts (does not
represent) the humanity of such subjects. This moment of humanization cannot be
spelled out with reference to the Hegelian conception of the struggle for recognition.
The gift, not struggle, is the means of obtaining recognitionparticularly by one slave
from another, not from the master. But even the master searches for recognition in
this way. Lordship itself can be understood as a peculiar form of the logics of giving,
a skewed form in which giving and receiving turn into selective giving and possession.
Csaire favorably cites Malinowski on this point, who describes the nature of the
European gift. According to Malinowski:
Every conception according to which Europe is a cornucopia or a place
where everything is freely given is mistaken. One does not need to be
54. Maldonado-Torres, Decolonization and the New Identitarian Logics after September 11.
55. Lewis R. Gordon, Fanon and the Crisis of European Man: An Essay on Philosophy and
the Human Sciences (New York: Routledge, 1995).
56. Fanon highlights the relevance of the concept of damnation in his Wretched of the Earth
(Les damns de la terre), trans. Richard Philcox (New York: Grove Press, 2004). Csaire
also uses the term. He writes that the culture of the colonized is condemned to remain
marginal in relation to European culture. See Aim Csaire, Culture et colonisation, in
Lire...le Discours sur le colonialisme de Aim Csaire, by Georges Ngal (Paris: Prsence
Africaine, 1994), 119.
57. mile Benveniste, Gift and Exchange in the Indo-European Vocabulary, in The Logic
of the Gift: Toward an Ethic of Generosity, ed. Alan D. Schrift (New York: Routledge,
1997), 33-42.
133
a specialist in anthropology in order to know that the European gift

is always highly selective. We never offer and we [never will offer] to
the indigenous peoples who live under our control the following
elements of our culture:
1) The instruments of physical force: firearms
2) Our instruments of political power
3) We will never share with the indigenous peoples the essential part
of our riches and our economic advantage
At no moment will we offer full political equality, or complete social
equality, or even full religious equality. Indeed, when we consider all
the points that we just listed it is easy to observe that it is not a matter
of giving [donner] but rather of taking [prendre].58
Europe pretends to give generously to the colonized, but that which it gives is
inessential. The irony of the colonizing endeavor is that the European imperial gift
presents itself as donation, but, on the one hand, as Malinowski points out, it is very
selective and, on the other, it establishes a logic of possession. Thus, colonization
can be seen as a perversion of the paradox of the gift. Giving is paradoxical because
the subject or its interests cannot fully account for its condition of possibility. Its
paradoxical character is most evinced at the point when a subject gives his or her
own life for a subject who is not even considered to be a subject and from whom one
cannot therefore expect anything in return.59 Colonialism fundamentally distorts
this paradox. The paradox of giving turns into the perverse paradox of possession
whereby the European takes away the possibilities of giving from the colonized,
while paradoxically also expecting gratitude. The imperial gift takes away from the
colonized the very possibilities of giving: that which the colonized could give has
been taken away from them. This is precisely the condition of damnation. The
colonizer-colonized relation fundamentally distorts and makes impossible reciprocal
relations of generosity between colonizer and colonized. The colonized are banned
from affirming their humanity through donation, while the colonizer lie to themselves by thinking that they give to the colonized when what they do is rather to
steal and take away things from them, including the very possibility of giving. In
colonialism, what takes the place of reciprocity and generosity is permanent debt,
which allows colonization to take the form of recurrent dependence. Thus, colonialism, which begins through conquest, gradually turns into a process that demands
58. Csaire, Culture et colonisation, 115, translation mine.
59. Nelson Maldonado-Torres, The Cry of the Self as a Call from the Other: The Paradoxical
Loving Subjectivity of Frantz Fanon, Listening: Journal of Religion and Culture 36, no.
1 (2001): 46-60.
134
permanent gratitude and permanent dependence. In this process, both colonizer and
colonized fail to achieve affirmation of their humanity in a way that is consonant
with the paradox of the gift, which is necessary for reciprocal recognition to take
place.
For Csaire, the slave perceives with clarity and distinctness that the master
enacts a logic of possession when they want to make colonization appear as if it were
an expression of generosity, the white mans burden. And, since generosity is basic
to the affirmation of humanity, this insight is relevant for knowledge about Europe
and its crisis. Colonialism alters the coordinates of relations that allow subjects
to affirm themselves as humans. In this sense it could be said that colonialism has
metaphysical implications, which requires philosophical anthropology to spell them
out. Fanon made clear, for instance, how black subjects were led to affirm their
humanity by adopting white masks.60 But colonialism dehumanizes the colonizer
and not only the colonized, as we will see below.
Csaire and Fanons analyses introduce peculiar visions of subjectivity and
sociality that defy Cartesian tenets, but they nonetheless remain committed to
universalism. This combination serves as the basis to new decolonial sciences.61
Csaire proposes the decolonial sciences as an alternative and antidote of sorts to
the European sciences. The relation between European humanity and its sciences, as
Husserl formulated them, make clear that the decolonial sciences must be included
in the preparation of any diagnosis of and cure to the crisis of European Man. At
least it appears that way with clarity and distinctness from the perspective of
the slave and the colonized. It is from this perspective that Csaire contributes to
the discourse about the crisis of the European sciences. Concerning European
scientists Csaire proclaims that their highly problematical subjective good faith
is entirely irrelevant to the objective social implications of the evil work they perform
as watchdogs of colonialism.62 Csaire offers several illuminating examples in

which he makes reference to Descartes Discourse on Method.
60. Fanon, Black Skin, White Masks.

61. In Dbat (extraits), Csaire notes Je trouve que Malinowski a eu le mrite, par sa
thorie du don slectif, de fournir une contribution trs intressante la science, une
contribution positive ce que jappelle lanticolonialisme; in Georges Ngal, Lire... le
Discours sur le colonialisme de Aim Csaire, 132. The most systematic continuations of
this project appear in the work of Sylvia Wynter and Lewis Gordon; see, Lewis R. Gordon,
Disciplinary Decadence: Living Thought in Trying Times (Boulder, Co.: Paradigm Press,
2006); Gordon, Fanon and the Crisis of European Man; Sylvia Wynter, The Ceremony
Must be Found: After Humanism, Boundary 212, no. 3 (1984): 19-65; Sylvia Wynter,
Unsettling the Coloniality of Being/Power/Truth/Freedom: Towards the Human,
After Man, Its OverrepresentationAn Argument, The New Centennial Review 3, no. 3
(2003): 257-337. See also Kenneth Knies formulations of post-European sciences in the
Worlds and Knowledges Otherwise dossier in Post-continental Philosophy (see n. 52).
135
From the Rev. Tempels, missionary and Belgian, his Bantu philosophy, as slimy and fetid as one could wish, but discovered very
opportunately, as Hinduism was discovered by others, in order to
counteract the communistic materialism which, it seems, threatens
to turn the Negroes into moral vagabonds.
From the historians or novelists of civilization (its the same thing)
not from this one or that one, but from all of them, or almost alltheir
false objectivity, their chauvinism, their sly racism, their depraved
passion for refusing to acknowledge any merit in the non-white races,
specially the black-skinned races, their obsession with monopolizing
all glory for their own race.
From the psychologists, sociologists, et. al., their views on primitivism, their rigged investigations, their self-serving generalizations, their
tendentious speculations, their insistence on the marginal, separate
character of the non-whites, andalthough each of these gentlemen, in
order to impugn on higher authority the weakness of primitive thought,
claims that his own is based on the firmest rationalismtheir barbaric
repudiation, for the sake of the cause, of Descartes statement, the
charter of universalism, that reason is found whole and entire
in each man, and that where individuals of the same species are
concerned, there may be degrees in respect of their accidental qualities,
but not in respect of their forms, or natures.63
Due to their racism, the European sciences go as far as betraying part of their
fundamental elements, such as Cartesian universalism. We have already seen that
Csaires surrealism, as well as some aspects of Discourse on Colonialism, parts ways
from Cartesian premises. Csaire, however, continues to hold on to a universalist
vision. To be sure, by no means must one be led to believe that universalism is only a
Cartesian legacy or that it belongs only to a European tradition of thought. Csaires
own formulation of universalism is nonetheless very original as it is founded on
dialogue and the imperative of decolonization, rather than on a monological and
monotopical Cartesian vision. It is from this perspective that the gift of the
colonized appears so important for him. The colonized has been stripped of the
means of giving (not only the means of production), but they nonetheless count with
the resources to offer something to the masters or colonizers, that is, an epistemic
perspective that would help them to understand themselves better and address their
crisis in a way that leads to the formation of a more humane world. To be sure, the
136
colonizer is most resistant to the gift of the colonized. To recognize such a gift as a gift
would entail accepting a certain finitude and limitation as well as the full humanity
of the colonized. These ideas and actions erode the very ground of colonialism and
racial superiority.
Csaire points out the complicity of the European sciences with the racist
perspective that sustains the colonizing mission. He deplores them for that. Such
racism and its conciliation with epistemology is a characteristic feature of the
barbarity that for Csaire distinguishes the colonizer. Failure to observe the
epistemological implications of the colonizer/colonized relation as well as the
continuous affirmation of imperial politics and attitudes led Europe into a state of
savagery. Csaire remarks that: First we must study how colonization works
to decivilize the colonizer, to brutalize him in the true sense of the word, to degrade
him, to awaken him to buried instincts, to covetousness, violence, race hatred,
and moral relativism.64 It is notable that racial hatred directly precedes moral
relativism in Csaires list. Husserl believed that relativism and skepticism were
decisive markers of the crisis of European Man as well as indicated a fundamental
departure from its Cartesian roots. For Csaire, racial hatred seems to be as or
more fundamental than relativism in understanding the crisis of Europe. Csaire
invites reflection about the relationship between the two terms. He leads us to ask
ourselves whether it is not so much that relativism leads to racial hatred as it is
rather that, at least in the European case, racial hatred undergirds the preference
for relativism at a certain point in Europes historyjust as in another period racial
hatred undergirded the preference for monotopical and monological universalism.
Or one could perhaps say that extreme doubt and relativism have always been a
central part of the European project inasmuch as the European civilization project
has been premised on the permanent skepticism concerning the full humanity of
non-European and racialized subjects, particularly indigenous and blacks. The
distorting effects of such skepticism do not appear clearly and cannot be properly
understood until the epistemological and ethical dimensions of the colonizer/colonized
relationship have come into light. To do this is precisely the task of Discourse on
Colonialism. Discourse on Colonialism seeks to correct the historical project that
is grounded on Descartes Discourse on Method. In this sense it also offers itself
as an obligatory reference point to the articulation of any decolonial and postEurocentric point of view.65
65. This project continues today in the work of the Modernity/Coloniality Research Group
(see n. 14), the Caribbean Philosophical Association, Latin@ philosophers and critical thinkers,
and in the work of Latin American liberation philosophers, among others. Figures who
belong to these different groups met recently in the conference Mapping the Decolonial
Turn: Post/Trans-Continental Interventions in Theory, Philosophy, and Critique at the
137
IV. Conclusions
Discourse on Colonialism is the contribution of a colonized and racialized black
subject to European discourses about the crisis of Europe and its Cartesian legacy. It
is a direct response to Descartes Discourse on Method. Csaire confesses that we
have been branded by Cartesian philosophy, by French rhetoric, but beyond such
brands one finds the ideas and experiences that survived colonial violence and others
that emerged in response to such violence.66 They are the sources for a clear and
distinct understanding of problems that the European refuses to confront. They
are also at the base of new ideas and proposals for human conviviality. Csaire highlights the promise of universalism under the rubrics of decolonization, as well as its
problematic expression in the European project. Csaire leads us to ask ourselves
what would have happened if Descartes had been attentive to the reason of the slave.
What kind of method would he have proposed to address the perversity of colonization
and the relation of the emerging sciences with it? What does it mean for the European humanity of the twentieth and the twenty-first century that the slaves have
spoken and continue to speak, or else, that his perspective has been at least partly
articulated and voiced?
Discourse on Colonialism offers itself as a mirror to, or a look at, Europe from
a position which is not entirely European, and which indeed, Europe continues to
subalternize. The Discourse articulates the point of view of the slave using discursive
forms that are characteristic of European reason, but it also points to its limits,
its silences, and its racism. For a very long time Europe has evaded this look, but
for this very reason it has not been able to gain a full understanding of its own
condition. Perhaps now, fifty years after Csaire published his Discourse, at a
moment when responses to Europes geo-political significance only seem to awaken
new forms of traditionalism, it begins to find more attention from dissatisfied
European intellectuals and scholars. The fascination with European roots is still
strong, however. A serious engagement with Csaire thus still remains a challenge.
Csaires Discourse, like the decolonial gift, has the form of the classic pharmakon
which is both medicine and venom.67 It is an offering which promises to initiate a
process that leads to the decolonization of Europeanity. It is also at the very basis
University of California, Berkeley (April, 2005) to discuss their commonalities and differences.
Some of the figures present included Linda Alcoff, Enrique Dussel, Lewis R. Gordon, Paget
Henry, Jos David Saldvar, Chela Sandova, and Sylvia Wynter, among others.
66. Csaire, Culture et colonisation, 68.
67. See Nelson Maldonado-Torres, Reconciliation as a Contested Future: Decolonization as
Project or Beyond the Paradigm of War, in Reconciliation: Nations and Churches in Latin
America, ed. Iain S. Maclean (London: Ashgate, 2006).
138
Contributors
of a post-Eurocentric and post-continental discourse.68 Discourse on Colonialism

is perhaps as important for the Europe of the twenty-first century, as Discourse on
Method was in the seventeenth. While modern Europe found its basis in Descartes
Discourse, global transmodernity has to come to terms with Csaire. Discourse on
Colonialism aims to take us beyond modernity/coloniality to transmodernity. This is
the task that it poses for twenty-first-century humanity.
CAROLINE ARRUDA
is a graduate student at SUNY, Stony Brook and is currently writing her
dissertation on the logical nature of the concept of recognition.
GEORGE CICCARIELLO-MAHER
is a Ph.D. candidate in political theory at the University of California,
Berkeley and holds prior degrees from St. Johns College, Cambridge and
St. Lawrence University. His interests include autonomist Marxism, race,
coloniality, and radical political praxis in Latin America. His publications
have appeared in Journal of Black Studies and The Commoner. He currently lives in Caracas, Venezuela.
DAVID INGRAM
is Professor of Philosophy at Loyola University in Chicago. His recent books
include Group Rights (University Press of Kansas, 2000); Rights, Democracy
and Fulfillment in the Era of Identity Politics (Rowman & Littlefield, 2004);
and Law: Key Concepts in Philosophy (Continuum, 2006).
NELSON MALDONADO-TORRES
is Assistant Professor of Comparative Ethnic Studies in the Department of
Ethnic Studies at the University of California, Berkeley. He specializes in the
comparison and analysis of critical theories as well as in postcolonial studies
and modern religious thought. He is interested in theories and philosophies
that address problems and questions related to the matrix of race, gender,
nation, and empire in the modern world. He has published several articles
and is working on two book-length projects: Against War: Views from the
Underside of Modernity (Duke, forthcoming), and Fanonian Meditations.
68. Enrique Dussel, The World-System: Europe as Center and its Periphery beyond
Eurocentrism, in Beyond Philosophy: Ethics, History, Marxism, and Liberation Theology,
ed. and trans. Eduardo Mendieta (Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield, 2003), 53-84;
Maldonado-Torres, Against War. See also the dossier in Post-continental Philosophy (see
n. 52).
Contributors
JOHN R. MARTIN, JR.
is currently a member of the Political Science Department at Albright College
in Reading, PA. He received his doctorate in Political Science from Rutgers
University, and has been a college professor for over 25 years, teaching at
institutions such as Vanderbilt University, Wabash College, Moravian College,
and Dowling College. His primary area of scholarly research and interest has
been the history of the American Left on issues of race, as well as the effects of
race and class on the form and substance of American democracy.
NIC VEROLI
is a political philosopher and co-founder, in 2000 following the anti-WTO
protests, of the Seattle Research Institute (SRI). He is the author of Politics
Without The State, with Diana George and Robert Corbett (SRI, 2002). His
reviews and articles have appeared in The Stranger, Arcade, Ijele: An e-journal
of African Aesthetics, International Studies In Philosophy, and The CLR
James Journal. Recently, with Diana George and Charles Mudede, he conducted
interviews with Alain Badiou and Bernard Henri Levy. Currently, he is working
on a theory of anarchic action. He lives in Brooklyn.
Books for Review

The following books are available for review in the Radical Philosophy Review. If
there is a book you would like to review that is not on this list, it can (typically) be
obtained by the Managing Editor and sent to you at no cost. If you would like to
review one or more of these books, or have other suggestions, please contact:
Jeffrey Paris
Managing Editor, Radical Philosophy Review
Department of Philosophy
University of San Francisco
2130 Fulton Street
San Francisco, CA 94117
(415) 422-5116
paris@usfca.edu
Rey Chow. The Age of the World Target: Self-Referentiality in War, Theory, and
Comparative Work. Durham: Duke University Press, 2006. 144 pp. $18.95, paper.
0822337444. [Next Wave Provocations]
Nigel Gibson. Fanon: The Postcolonial Imagination. Oxford: Polity, 2003. 264 pp.
$59.95, paper. 0745622615. [Key Contemporary Thinkers]
Lewis R. Gordon. Disciplinary Decadence: Living Thought in Trying Times. Boulder:
Paradigm Publishers, 2006. 321 pp. $68.00, hardback. 1594512558.
Lewis R. Gordon and Jane Anna Gordon. Not Only the Masters Tools: AfricanAmerican Studies in Theory and Practice. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers, 2006.
321 pp. $29.95, paper. 1594511470. [Cultural Politics and the Promise of
Democracy]
Elizabeth Grosz. The Nick of Time: Politics, Evolution, and the Untimely. Durham:
Duke University Press, 2004. 336 pp. $22.95, paper. 082233397x.
George Hartley. The Abyss of Representation: Marxism and the Postmodern Sublime.
Durham: Duke University Press, 2003. 338 pp. $22.95, paper. 0822331144.
[Post-Contemporary Interventions]
Kojin Karatani. Transcritique: On Kant and Marx, trans. Sabu Kohso. Cambridge:
The MIT Press, 2004. 366 pp. $35, cloth. 0262112744.
Stathis Kouvelakis. Philosophy and Revolution: From Kant to Marx, trans. G.M.
Goshgarian. London: Verso, 2003. 434 pp. $22, paper. 1859844715.
Books for Review

Bill E. Lawson & Donald F. Koch, eds. Pragmatism and the Problem of Race.
Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 2004. 256pp. $22.95. 0253216478.
Richard E. Lee. Life and Times of Cultural Studies: The Politics and Transformation
of the Structures of Knowledge. Durham: Duke University Press, 2004. 278 pp.
$22.95, paper. 082233173x. [Philosophy and Postcoloniality]
Steve Martinot. Forms in the Abyss: A Philosophical Bridge between Sartre and
Derrida. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2006. 320 pp. $59.50, cloth.
1592134394.
John H. McClendon III. C. L. R. Jamess Notes on Dialectics. Lanham, MD: Lexington
Books, 2005. 426 Pp. $33.00, paper. 0739109251.
Chandra Talpade Mohanty. Feminism Without Borders: Decolonizing Theory,
Practicing Solidarity. Durham: Duke University Press, 2003. 312 pp. $21.95,
paper. 0822330210.
Peg OConnor. Oppression and Responsibility: A Wittgensteinian Approach to
Social Practices and Moral Theory. University Park: Penn State University Press,
2002. 152 pp. $35, hardcover. 0271022027.
Dylan Rodrguez. Forced Passages: Imprisoned Radical Intellectuals and the U.S.
Prison Regime. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, 2006. 288 pp. $19.95,
paper. 0816645612.
John Sanbonmatsu. The Postmodern Prince: Critical Theory, Left Strategy, and the
Making of a New Political Subject. New York, Monthly Review Press, 2004. 256
pp. $22.95, paper. 1583670904.
Timothy Shanahan, ed. Philosophy 9/11: Thinking about the War on Terrorism.
Chicago: Open Court Publishing, 2005. 290 pp. $29.95, paper. 0812695828.
Tony Smith. Globalisation: A Systematic Marxian Account. Leiden, The Netherlands:
Brill, 2006. 358 pp. $120.00, cloth. 9004147276. [Historical Materialism]
Shannon Sullivan. Revealing Whiteness: The Unconscious Habits of Racial
Privilege. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2001. 264 pp. $22.95, paper.
0253218489. [American Philosophy]
Alys Eve Weinbaum. Wayward Reproductions: Genealogies of Race and Nation in
Transatlantic Modern Thought. Durham: Duke University Press, 2004. 348 pp.
$22.95, paper. 082233155. [Next Wave: New Directions in Womens Studies]
RPR Volume 9 Number 2 2006
Executive Editor
Eduardo Mendieta, The State University of New York at Stony Brook
Managing & Assistant Editor
Jeffrey Paris, University of San Francisco
Associate Editors
Michael Hames-Garca, University of Oregon
Nelson Maldonado-Torres, The University of California, Berkeley
Martin Beck Matutk, Purdue University
Falguni A. Sheth, Hampshire College
Editorial Board
Anatole Anton, S.F. State University
Sandra Bartky, University of Illinois
Betsy Bowman, Radical Phil. Association
Tom Digby, Springfield College
Cliff Durand, Morgan State University
Enrique Dussel, Universidad Nacional
Autnoma de Mexico and Universidad
Autnoma Metropolitana, Iztapalapa
Brian Elwood, La Salle University, Manila
Irene Gendzier, Boston University
David Theo Goldberg, UC at Irvine
Barbara Harlowe, UT at Austin
Leonard Harris, Purdue University
Paget Henry, Brown University
Dwight Hopkins, University of Chicago
Alison Jaggar, University of Colorado
Carolyn Y. Johnson, Filmmaker
Clarence Schol Johnson, Middle Tennessee

State University
William R. Jones, Florida State University
Bill Lawson, Michigan State University
Tommy Lott, San Jose State University
Manning Marable, Columbia University
Marilyn Nissim-Sabat, Lewis University
Lucius T. Outlaw, Vanderbilt University
Barbara Ransby, University of Illinois
Richard Schmitt, Brown University
Bob Stone, Long Island University
Nancy Tuana, University of Oregon
Lou Turner, Northern Illinois State
Joe Walsh, Stockton College
Tom Wartenberg, Mt. Holyoke College
Josiah Young III, Wesleyan Theol. Sem.
Radical Philosophy Review provides a forum for activist scholars, community

activists, and artists to explore concepts central to the humanistic transformation of
society. The journal features original articles, special discussions, and reviews of
interest to those who share the view that society should be built on cooperation rather
than competition, and that social decision-making should be governed by democratic
procedures. The journal also publishes special issues devoted to topics of particular social
or political importance.
The Post-Colonial Atlantic
The Internal Limits of the European Gaze:
Intellectuals and the Colonial Difference
George Ciccariello-Maher
C.L.R. Jamess Analysis of Race and Class
John R. Martin, Jr.
Book Reviews
Seyla Benhabib, The Rights of Others
David Ingram
Anton Pannekoek, Workers Councils
Nic Veroli
Dick Howard, The Specter of Democracy
Caroline Arruda
Radical Philosophy Review is owned by the Radical Philosophy Association, a

not-for-profit organization. RPR is indexed in Academic Search Premier, Alternative
Press Index, American Humanities Index, International Bibliography of the Social
Sciences, MLA International Bibliography, International Bibliography of Periodical
Literature, International Bibliography of Book Reviews of Scholarly Literature, and the
Philosophers Index.
Layout for this issue was done at the University of San Francisco by Jeffrey Paris.
Special thanks go to George Leaman of the Philosophy Documentation Center, to Greg
Wolff for proofreading, and to the University of San Francisco for its financial support.
www.radicalphilosophy.org www.pdcnet.org/rpr.html
www.radicalphilosophy.org www.pdcnet.org/rpr.html

Maldonado - Torres - Césaire's Gift and The Decolonial Turn

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Maldonado - Torres - Césaire's Gift and The Decolonial Turn

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Maldonado - Torres - Césaire's Gift and The Decolonial Turn

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

What is the journal about?

What is the journal about?

What are the submission guidelines for the journal?

What are the submission guidelines for the journal?

RPR

Volume 9 Number 2 2006

Radical Philosophy Review (ISSN 1388-4441) is published biannually by

Radical Philosophy Review

Membership & Subscriptions

Editorial & Submissions

volume 9, number 2 (2006)

Csaires Gift and the

The Internal Limits of the

European Gaze: Intellectuals

C.L.R. Jamess Analysis of

The Rights of Others, by

The Specter of Democracy,

Eduardo Mendieta & Jeffrey Paris

The Post-Colonial Atlantic

Radical Philosophy Review

Volume 9 Number 2 2006

Books for Review

Eduardo Mendieta & Jeffrey Paris

ew readers of Radical Philosophy Review are likely to have read a 2003

volume 9, number 2 (2006) iii-v

Eduardo Mendieta & Jeffrey Paris

struggles. Democracy remains one of the most global of human endeavors, a

Csaires Gift and the

A civilization that proves incapable of solving the

Radical Philosophy Review

volume 9, number 2 (2006) 111-138

Csaires Gift and the Decolonial Turn

im Csaires indictment of European civilization occurred at a point when

recognition, this response by philosophers Jrgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida

2. I thank the participants of the workshop on Transcultural Humanities at the University

Csaires Gift and the Decolonial Turn

I will take the relation of Csaires Discourse on Colonialism to Descartes Discourse

I. From the Idea to the Project of Decolonization in the

Csaires Gift and the Decolonial Turn

My use of modernity/coloniality here refers mainly to the idea that it is necessary

15. Chela Sandoval, Methodology of the Oppressed (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota

Csaires Gift and the Decolonial Turn

Csaires Gift and the Decolonial Turn

trary to the decolonization struggles in Latin America throughout the nineteenth

Csaires Gift and the Decolonial Turn

Western modernity, which Enrique Dussel refers to as trans-modern.34 The project of

II. Discourse on Colonialism, the Crisis of Europe, and

34. Enrique Dussel, Etica de la liberacin en la edad de la globalizacin y de la exclusin

Csaires Gift and the Decolonial Turn

III. Discourse on Colonialism and the Crisis of Europe

Csaires Gift and the Decolonial Turn

characterized by employing unconscious forces and pre-rational elements in order to

Well then, if I apply the surrealist approach to my particular situation,

44. Edmund Husserl, Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology, trans.

Csaires Gift and the Decolonial Turn

Yes, it would be worthwhile to study clinically, in detail, the steps

Csaires Gift and the Decolonial Turn

the Discourse on Colonialism as a necessary epistemic source for Europe to achieve

Csaires Gift and the Decolonial Turn