Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics: Jikun Wang, Xudong Zhao
Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics: Jikun Wang, Xudong Zhao
Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics: Jikun Wang, Xudong Zhao
Family functioning and social support for older patients with depression in an
urban area of Shanghai, China
Jikun Wang *, Xudong Zhao
Department of Psychiatry, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, China
A R T I C L E I N F O
A B S T R A C T
Article history:
Received 8 February 2012
Received in revised form 31 May 2012
Accepted 18 June 2012
Available online 6 July 2012
Purpose: Geriatric depression is now very common and leads to signicant economic costs and family
burden in China. Families with a depressed patient often report problematic family functioning in
Western samples, and lack of social support is strongly associated with geriatric depression. However, the
relationship between geriatric depression, family functioning and social support in mainland China has
not been well studied.
Materials and methods: This study compared family functioning and social support in a Chinese sample of
elderly patients with major depression and non-depressed elderly people, and evaluated the impact of
family functioning, social support and socio-demographic factors on depression. A questionnaire was
administered to 102 elderly patients with major depression and 107 non-depressed elderly people.
Results: The elderly patients with major depression had worse family functioning and lower social
support than elderly individuals without depression. Multivariate linear regression analysis showed
associations between depressive symptoms and unhealthy family functioning, lower social support and
single marital status.
Conclusions: The ndings suggest that family interventions and improvement of social support are
important in reducing depression among elderly patients. In addition, strategies to alleviate geriatric
depression should be considered by the whole society, the community, family members and the
depressed elderly patients themselves.
2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Chinese
Geriatric depression
Family functioning
Family Assessment Device
Social support
1. Introduction
With the rapidly aging population in China, increasing attention is
being paid to the mental and physical health of older people.
Depression is very common and represents a major mental disorder
in those who are older (Back & Lee, 2011), adversely affecting daily
functioning and quality of life worldwide (Wada et al., 2005).
Geriatric depression puts an immense burden on patients, their
families and society as a whole (Chen et al., 2005). In addition,
depression is a very costly disorder in China (Hu, He, Zhang, & Chen,
2007). Providing effective treatment could result in a signicant
reduction in the total burden associated with depression. Therefore, it
is imperative to explore factors inuencing the prognosis of geriatric
depression in China and improve treatment strategies. Family factors
and social support are two important aspects associated with health
in aging people (Leung, Chen, Lue, & Hsu, 2007).
Family impairment refers to a familys inability to accomplish
tasks that are important for their well being (Miller, Ryan, Keitner,
* Corresponding author at: P.O. Box 244, Tongji University, Siping Road 1239,
Shanghai 200092, China. Tel.: +86 21 65988874; fax: +86 21 65988874.
E-mail address: liwangjk@gmail.com (J. Wang).
0167-4943/$ see front matter 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2012.06.011
575
2.2. Instruments
The GDS, Family Assessment Device (FAD) (Epstein, Baldwin, &
Bishop, 1983; Miller, Epstein, Bishop, & Keitner, 1985), Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) (Zimet, Powell,
Farley, Werkman, & Berkoff, 1990) and a self-designed questionnaire
for collecting demographic data were used in the study.
2.2.1. The GDS
Depression in the older patients was assessed by the GDS, an
instrument used to assess depression in the elderly. It consists of
30 items. Subjects are asked to respond based on their feelings in
the previous one week. Each item includes two answer choices:
Yes or No, with each answer indicating depression assigned
one point. Scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating
higher levels of depression. The GDS has an internal consistency of
a = 0.85. Scores from 0 to 10 are considered in the normal range.
Scores from 11 to 20 are considered to represent minimal to mild
depression, and moderate to severe depression is indicated by
scores of 2130.
2.2.2. The FAD
Family functioning was assessed using the Chinese version of
the Family Assessment Device (FAD-CV). The FAD is a 60-item self
report inventory that measures family members perceptions of
various aspects of family functioning according to the McMaster
Model of Family Functioning (MMFF) (Miller et al., 2000). The
MMFF assesses six dimensions of family functioning: Problem
Solving (the ability of the family to resolve problems that
maintains effective family functioning); communication (how
family members exchange information with each other); roles
(how the family assigns responsibilities in the family to ensure
fulllment of family functions); Affective Responsiveness (whether the family members respond with a full spectrum of feelings
experienced by human beings); Affective Involvement (the
familys ability to be interested in each other); behavior control
(rules that the family adopts to handle dangerous situations, to
meet psychobiological needs and interpersonal socializing behavior within and outside the family); and overall General Functioning. Health pathology cutoff scores have been established for the
FAD for each dimension of family functioning (Miller et al., 1994).
Higher scores indicate worse family functioning. The validity and
reliability of the Chinese FAD has been demonstrated (Shek, 2001,
2002). The testretest reliability is 0.530.81, and coefcient
alphas range from 0.53 to 0.94.
576
Table 1
Sociodemographic data of the depressed and non-depressed elderly groups,
mean SD or n (%).
Variables
Depressed
elderly
Not-depressed
elderly
Number
Age (years)
Gender
Male
Female
Education (years)
Educational level
Primary school
Secondary school
High school
University
Marital status
Married (remarried)
Single (never married,
divorce or widowed)
GDS
Mild
Moderate/severe
102
64.5 2.86
107
63.8 2.84
46 (45.1)
56 (54.9)
10.2 2.51
52 (48.6)
55 (51.4)
10.7 2.18
12
45
38
6
7
40
55
5
(11.8)
(44.1)
(37.3)
(5.9)
88 (86.3)
12 (13.7)
p=
0.061
0.356
0.136
(6.5)
(37.4)
(51.4)
(4.7)
102 (95.3)
5 (4.7)
30 (29.4)
72 (70.6)
MSPSS scores between depressed elderly patients and nondepressed elderly people. Pearsons correlation was used to assess
the association between depression scores, FAD scores and social
support scores among depressed elderly patients. We used
multiple linear regression with stepwise analysis to study the
signicant factors predictive of depression. All data were
performed using the SPSS 13.0 statistical software package.
3. Results
3.1. General data
The distribution of socio-demographic characteristics of the
209 subjects is shown in Table 1. The resulting data represented
102 depressed and 107 non-depressed elderly people. Subjects
ranged in age from 60 to 80 years. The depressed elderly patients
had the following characteristics: 46 (45.1%) were male and 56
(54.9%) were female; their mean age was 64.5 years (SD = 2.86);
they had a mean of 10.2 years of schooling (SD = 2.51), and most
patients (81.4%) had an educational level of secondary or high
school. The non-depressed elderly people had the following
characteristics: 52 (48.6%) were male and 55 (51.4%) were female;
their mean age was 63.8 years (SD = 2.84); they had a mean of 10.7
years of schooling (SD = 2.18), and most patients (88.8%) had an
educational level of secondary or high school. The t-test and x2 test
showed that there were no signicant differences between
Table 2
Statistical comparison of parameters in the depressed group by independent t-tests, mean SD.
Mild depression (n = 30)
Family functioning
PS
CM
RL
AR
AI
BC
GF
Social support
Total support
Family
Friends
Signicant others
2.42 0.26
2.39 0.34
2.32 0.58
2.39 0.36
2.10 0.30
2.60 0.20
2.26 0.29
2.63 0.57
2.48 0.29
2.34 0.28
2.47 0.59
2.27 0.57
2.72 0.57
2.30 0.54
2.596
0.883
0.256
0.786
2.107
1.551
0.417
0.011*
0.379
0.799
0.434
0.038*
0.124
0.677
46.68 12.20
13.22 5.22
21.69 4.59
11.76 5.06
55.90 13.79
16.53 5.61
24.17 2.59
15.20 6.33
3.345
2.854
2.766
2.896
0.001**
0.005**
0.007**
0.005**
Notes: PS, Problem Solving; CM, Communication; RL, Roles; AR, Affective Responsiveness; AI, Affective Involvement; BC, Behavioral Control; GF, General Functioning.
Unhealthy scores of FAD are underlined. High scores of FAD indicate worse family functioning and high scores of MSPSS indicate lower social support.
*
p < 0.05.
**
p < 0.01.
577
Table 3
Statistical comparison of parameters in the two groups by independent t-tests, mean SD.
Depressed elderly
Family functioning
PS
CM
RL
AR
AI
BC
GF
Social support
Total support
Family
Friends
Signicant others
Normal elderly
2.46 0.46
2.39 0.51
2.30 0.45
2.38 0.50
2.20 0.30
2.61 0.44
2.25 0.44
49.08 13.29
14.08 5.53
22.34 4.25
12.66 5.63
2.04 0.35
2.10 0.29
2.22 0.20
2.12 0.36
2.08 0.54
2.22 0.27
1.96 0.26
7.328
5.055
1.774
4.435
1.980
7.881
5.669
0.0001**
0.0001**
0.077
0.0001**
0.049*
0.0001**
0.0001**
25.59 9.18
7.50 3.06
9.79 3.32
8.21 3.38
14.927
10.638
23.712
6.914
0.0001**
0.0001**
0.0001**
0.0001**
Notes: PS, Problem Solving; CM, Communication; RL, Roles; AR, Affective Responsiveness; AI, Affective Involvement; BC, Behavioral Control; GF, General Functioning.
Unhealthy scores of FAD are underlined. High scores of FAD indicate worse family functioning and high scores of MSPSS indicate lower social support.
*
p < 0.05.
**
p < 0.01.
Table 4
Correlation between depression, family functioning and social support.
Parameters
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
1. Depression
2. PS
3. CM
4. RL
5. AR
6. AI
7. BC
8. GF
9. Family support
10. Friends support
11. Signicant others support
0.334**
0.189
0.112
0.209*
0.404**
0.253*
0.174
0.396**
0.347**
0.391**
0.737**
0.752**
0.783**
0.696**
0.848**
0.809**
0.302**
0.214*
0.322**
0.792**
0.804**
0.587**
0.729**
0.822**
0.368**
0.259**
0.358**
0.819**
0.636**
0.745**
0.907**
0.459**
0.286**
0.481**
0.555**
0.734**
0.889**
0.519**
0.336**
0.501**
0.709**
0.644**
0.302**
0.082
0.303**
0.801**
0.273**
0.252**
0.270**
0.515**
0.256**
0.509**
0.380**
0.961**
0.389**
Notes: PS, Problem Solving; CM, Communication; RL, Roles; AR, Affective Responsiveness; AI, Affective Involvement; BC, Behavioral Control; GF, General Functioning.
*
p < 0.05.
**
p < 0.01.
Table 5
Multivariate linear regression with the GDS as the dependent variable among the depressed elderly patients.
Constant
PS
CM
RL
AR
AI
BC
GF
Family support
Friend support
Other support
Marital status
p<
95% CI
Adjusted R2
R2
31.725
4.374
0.682
3.519
1.160
2.784
0.216
2.976
0.243
0.229
0.049
1.914
0.004**
0.533
0.049*
0.422
0.001**
0.895
0.202
0.180
0.002**
0.778
0.036*
1.629 to 7.492
1.484 to 2.849
0.346 to 7.255
1.698 to 4.018
1.278 to 4.497
3.035 to 3.467
1.623 to 7.574
0.599 to 0.114
0.091 to 0.369
0.391 to 0.294
0.181 to 3.069
0.455
0.514
Notes: PS, Problem Solving; CM, Communication; RL, Roles; AR, Affective Responsiveness; AI, Affective Involvement; BC, Behavioral Control; GF, General Functioning. Total
n = 102.
*
p < 0.05.
**
p < 0.01.
578
579
Herr, N. R., Hammen, C., & Brennan, P. A. (2007). Current and past depression as
predictors of family functioning: A comparison of men and women in a community
sample. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 694702.
Hu, T. W., He, Y. L., Zhang, M. Y., & Chen, N. (2007). Economic costs of depression in
China. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 42, 110116.
Huo, Y. L., & Zhang, G. Q. (2007). Correlation of depression with social support, coping
style and mental defense mechanism in patients with maintenance hemodialysis.
Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research, 11, 1065410657, (in
Chinese).
Kaneko, Y., Motohashi, Y., Sasaki, H., & Yamaji, M. (2007). Prevalence of depressive
symptoms and related risk factors for depressive symptoms among elderly persons
living in a rural Japanese community: A cross-sectional study. Community Mental
Health Journal, 43, 583590.
Keitner, G. I., Fodor, J., Ryan, C. E., Miller, I. W., Bishop, D. S., & Epstein, N. B. (1991). A
cross-cultural study of major depression and family functioning. Canadian Journal
of Psychiatry. Revue Canadienne de Psychiatrie, 36, 254259.
Kleinman, A. (2004). Culture and depression. New England Journal of Medicine, 10, 951
953.
Leung, K. K., Chen, C. Y., Lue, B. H., & Hsu, S. T. (2007). Social support and family
functioning on psychological symptoms in elderly Chinese. Archives of Gerontology
and Geriatrics, 44, 203213.
Mazzella, F., Cacciatore, F., Galizia, G., Della-Morte, D., Rossetti, M., Abbruzese, R., et al.
(2010). Social support and long-term mortality in the elderly: Role of comorbidity.
Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 51, 323328.
Miller, I. W., Epstein, N. B., Bishop, D. S., & Keitner, G. I. (1985). The McMaster Family
Assessment Device: Reliability and validity. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy,
11, 345356.
Miller, I. W., Kabacoff, R. I., Epstein, N. B., Bishop, D. S., Keitner, G. I., Baldwin, L. M., et al.
(1994). The development of a clinical rating scale for the McMaster model of family
functioning. Family Process, 33, 5369.
Miller, I. W., Ryan, C. E., Keitner, G. I., Bishop, D. S., & Epstein, N. B. (2000). The McMaster
Approach to Families: Theory, assessment, treatment and research. Journal of
Family Therapy, 22, 168189.
Mohr, D. C., & Genain, C. (2004). Social support as a buffer in the relationship between
treatment for depression and T-cell production of interferon gamma in patients
with multiple sclerosis. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 57, 155158.
Peirce, R. S., Frone, M. R., Russell, M., Cooper, M. L., & Mudar, P. (2000). A longitudinal
model of social contact, social support, depression, and alcohol use. Health Psychology, 19, 2838.
Prince, M. J., Harwood, R. H., Thomas, A., & Mann, A. H. (1998). A prospective population-based cohort study of the effects of disablement and social milieu on the onset
and maintenance of late-life depression. The Gospel Oak Project VII. Psychological
Medicine, 28, 337350.
Restifo, K., & Bogels, S. (2009). Family processes in the development of youth depression: Translating the evidence to treatment. Clinical Psychology Review, 29, 294
316.
Ryder, A. G., Yang, J., Zhu, X. Z., Yao, S., Heine, S. J., & Bagby, R. M. (2008). The cultural
shaping of depression: Somatic symptoms in China, psychological symptoms in
North America? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 2, 300313.
Shek, D. T. (2001). The General Functioning Scale of the Family Assessment Device:
Does it work with Chinese adolescents? Journal of Clinical Psychology, 57, 1503
1516.
Shek, D. T. (2002). Assessment of family functioning in Chinese adolescents: The
Chinese version of the Family Assessment Device. Research on Social Work Practice,
12, 502524.
Tam, S., & Neysmith, S. (2006). Disrespect and isolation: Elder abuse in Chinese
communities. Canadian Journal on Aging, 25, 141151.
Wada, T., Ishine, M., Sakagami, T., Kita, T., Okumiya, K., Mizuno, K., et al. (2005).
Depression, activities of daily living, and quality of life of community-dwelling
elderly in three Asian countries: Indonesia, Vietnam, and Japan. Archives of
Gerontology and Geriatrics, 41, 271280.
Wang, J. K., & Zhao, X. D. (2012). Empty nest syndrome in China. International Journal of
Social Psychiatry, 58, 110.
Xie, L. Q., Zhang, J. P., Peng, F., & Jiao, N. N. (2010). Prevalence and related inuencing
factors of depressive symptoms for empty-nest elderly living in the rural area of
YongZhou, China. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 50, 2429.
Yesavage, J. A., Brink, T. L., Rose, T. L., Lum, O., Huang, V., Adey, M., et al. (1983).
Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: A preliminary report. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 17, 3749.
Zimet, G. D., Powell, S. S., Farley, G. K., Werkman, S., & Berkoff, K. A. (1990). Psychometric characteristics of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support.
Journal of Personality Assessment, 55, 610617.