Diabetic Food
Diabetic Food
Diabetic Food
An MWC Publication
www.residentandstaff.com
2004 UMDNJ-Center for Continuing
and Outreach Education and
Romaine Pierson Publishers, Inc.
Ira A. Grunther
Kimberly A. Melofchik
Lara J. Reiman
Assistant Projects Editorial Directors
Barbara Marino
Director, Quality Assurance
Jill Olivero
Copy Editor
Michael S. Hubert
Creative Director
Michael J. Molfetto
Design Director, Projects
Lora Klein
Production Manager
Elizabeth Lang
Director, Manufacturing &
Production
Robert Issler
Vice President
Chief Operating Officer
Medical and Dental Group
Daniel Perkins
Senior Vice President
Medical/Dental Divisions
PROJ R163
The Diabetic Foot Ulcer: Management and Prevention Strategies in Primary Care
CME-CE Certified Activity Sponsored by the
University of Medicine & Dentistry of New Jersey (UMDNJ)
Center for Continuing and Outreach Education
Release Date: July 2004 Expiration Date: June 30, 2005
This activity is supported by an unrestricted educational grant from Novo Nordisk.
Introduction:
The purpose of this activity is to educate health care providers on the management and prevention of
diabetic foot ulcer.
Target Audience:
This activity is designed for primary care practitioners, nurses, and pharmacists.
Learning Objectives:
Upon completion of this activity, participants should be able to:
Discuss the causes and risk factors of foot ulcer in diabetic patients
Determine the severity of foot ulcer in a particular patient
List application of appropriate treatment
Describe measures to prevent occurrence of foot ulcer
Method of Instruction:
Participants should read the learning objectives and review the activity in its entirety. After reviewing the
material, complete the post-test/self-assessment test consisting of a series of multiple-choice questions.
Upon completing this activity as designed and achieving a passing score of 70% or more on the post-test,
participants will receive a CME-CE credit letter awarding AMA/PRA category 1 credit, nursing continuing education credit, pharmacy continuing education credit, and the test answer key four (4) to six (6) weeks after receipt of the post-test, registration, and evaluation materials.
Estimated time to complete this activity as designed is 1.0 hour.
Physician Accreditation:
UMDNJCenter for Continuing and Outreach Education is accredited by the Accreditation Council for
Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
UMDNJCenter for Continuing and Outreach Education designates this educational activity for a maximum
of 1.0 category 1 credit toward the AMA Physicians Recognition Award. Each physician should claim only
those credits that he/she actually spent in the activity.
The activity was prepared in accordance with the ACCME Essentials.
Nursing Accreditation:
UMDNJCenter for Continuing and Outreach Education is an approved provider of continuing education
by the New Jersey State Nurses Association (NJSNA), Provider Number P173-9/2003-2006. Provider Approval
is valid through June 30, 2005. NJSNA is accredited by the ANCC Commission on Accreditation. This activity
is approved for 1.0 contact hours.
Provider approved by the California Board of Registered Nursing, Provider Number CEP 13780 for 1.0
contact hours.
Pharmacy Accreditation:
UMDNJ is accredited by the American Council on Pharmaceutical Education as a provider of
continuing pharmaceutical education. This course 374-000-04-017-H01 qualifies for 1.0 contact hour
(0.100 CEU) of continuing pharmacy credit, which will be awarded via mail within four (4) to
six (6) weeks after successful completion of the program. Release Date: July 2004 Expiration
Date: June 30, 2005.
This activity was reviewed for relevance, accuracy of content, balance of presentation, and time required for
participation by Azeez Farooki, MD; Anne Marie Van Hoven, MD; Ms. Lorna Austin, CPhT; Ms. Jennifer
Nishioka, RPh; Ms. Helene Mitzi Dolese, RN, CIM; Joanne Librie, RN; and Irina Lipets, RN, BSN.
Faculty:
Mark Angelo, MD
Assistant Faculty, Internal Medicine
University of Medicine & Dentistry of New Jersey
Robert Wood Johnson Medical School
Cooper Health System
Camden, NJ
Program Directors:
Dorothy Caputo, MA, APRN, BC-ADM, CDE
Director of Special Initiatives
Continuing and Outreach Education
Assistant Professor,
UMDNJSchool of Health Related Professions
New Brunswick, NJ
Disclosure:
In accordance with the disclosure policies of UMDNJ and to conform with ACCME, ACPE, ANCC-COA,
and FDA guidelines, all program faculty are required to disclose to the activity participants: (1) the existence of
any financial interest or other relationships with the manufacturers of any commercial products/devices, or
providers of commercial services, that relate to the content of their presentation/material, or the commercial
contributors of this activity, that could be perceived as a real or apparent conflict of interest; and (2) the identification of a commercial product/device that is unlabeled for use or an investigational use of a product/device
not yet approved.
Faculty Disclosure Declarations:
Drs Angelo, Nam, and Vamos, and Ms Caputo have no significant financial relationships to disclose.
Field Tester Disclosure Declarations:
Drs Van Hoven and Farooki and Ms Austin, Dolese, Librie, Lipets, and Nishioka have no significant
financial interests to disclose.
Off-Label Usage Disclosure:
This activity does not contain information of commercial products/devices that are unlabeled for use or
investigational uses of products not yet approved.
Disclaimer:
The views expressed in this activity are those of the faculty. It should not be inferred or assumed that they
are expressing the views of Novo Nordisk, any other manufacturer of pharmaceuticals, UMDNJ, or Romaine
Pierson Publishers, Inc.
Accreditation refers to recognition of continuing nursing education activities only and does not imply the
University of Medicine and Dentistry of New JerseyCenter for Continuing and Outreach Education, NJSNA,
California Board of Registered Nursing or ANCC Commission on Accreditation approval or endorsement of
any commercial product.
The drug selection and dosage information presented in this activity are believed to be accurate. However,
participants are urged to consult the full prescribing information on any agent(s) presented in this activity for
recommended dosage, indications, contraindications, warnings, precautions, and adverse effects before prescribing any medication. This is particularly important when a drug is new or infrequently prescribed.
Copyright 2004 UMDNJCenter for Continuing and Outreach Education and Romaine Pierson
Publishers, Inc. All rights reserved including translation into other languages. No part of this activity may
be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying,
recording, or any information storage and retrieval systems, without permission in writing from UMDNJ
Center for Continuing and Outreach Education and Romaine Pierson Publishers, Inc.
Ira A. Grunther
Pathogenesis of Diabetic
Neuropathy
The pathogenesis of diabetic neuropathy involves a complex interre-
Hyperglycemia
Increased aldose
reductase activity
Increased DAG,
PKC activity
Glycation of
proteins, AGE
Diabetic complications
AGE = advanced glycation end products; DAG = diacylglycerol; PKC = protein kinase C.
Figure 1Pathogenesis of diabetic neuropathy. Adapted from Rose BD, McCulloch DK.
Glycemic control and vascular complications in type 1 diabetes mellitus. UpToDate.
www.uptodate.com.
NADPH
NADP
NAD
Sorbitol
Glucose
Aldose reductase
Osmotic
effects
NADH
Fructose
Sorbitol dehydrogenase
Decreased
cell myoinositol
Other?
NAD = nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide; NADH = the reduced form of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide; NADP = nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate; NADPH = the reduced form of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate.
Figure 2Role of sorbitol in diabetic microvascular disease. Adapted from Frank RN.
On the pathogenesis of diabetic retinopathy. A 1990 update. Ophthalmology. 1991;98:
586-593.
Neuropathy
The cytotoxic, ischemic/hypoxic
effects of sorbitol, AGE, and DAG/
PKC are thought to disrupt signal
transduction in the peripheral nerves.
Malfunction of the sensory nervous
system leads to a segmental demyelinization process in type-A sensory fibers, which are involved with
proprioception and the sensations of
Sensory dysfunction
Motor dysfunction
Decreased sensory
perception of:
Small
muscle atrophy
Decreased
sweating
Imbalance of flexor
and extensor muscles
Dry, scaly
skin
Clawed toes
Fissures
Edema
Prominent
metatarsal heads
Infection
Poor wound
healing
Autonomic dysfunction
Arteriovenous shunt
Pain
Vibration
Temperature
Decreased
capillary pressure
Touch
Injury:
Arterial insufficiency
Mechanical
Thermal
Musculoskeletal abnormalities
Diabetic patients are susceptible
to musculoskeletal abnormalities of
the foot, such as neuropathic arthropathy, previously known as
Charcots foot. Neuropathic arthropathy is characterized by
chronic, progressive, degenerative
disease of 1 or more joints and is
Chemical
Altered gait
Callus
Foot ulcer
Figure 3Pathophysiology of foot ulcers from diabetic neuropathy. Adapted from
Zangara GA, Hull MM. Diabetic neuropathy: pathophysiology and prevention of foot
ulcers. Clin Nurse Spec. 1999;13:57-65.
Clinical Presentation
Common sites of foot ulcers are
the metatarsal heads and distal
phalanx, medial and lateral midfoot, and the heel. Various methods
Mild ulcers
Mild, nonlimb-threatening ulcers are often shallow lesions with a
clean base and less than 2 cm of surrounding cellulitis, with no evidence
of fasciitis, abscess, or osteomyelitis. No ischemic process is involved,
and the patient has good blood glucose control. Initial treatment includes oral antibiotics and wound
care. The causative organisms for
these ulcers are primarily aerobic
gram-positive cocci (eg, Staphylococcus aureus and streptococci).23
Severe ulcer.
Treatment
Mild ulcer.
Localized care
Severe ulcers
Limb-threatening ulcers are
those characterized by deep infection and more than 2 cm of cellulitis. Such ulcers involve ischemia,
and their metabolic control is poor.
At presentation these foot ulcers
often have evidence of fasciitis or
frank abscess formation. X-ray
films of the foot may demonstrate
periosteal lifting associated with
osteomyelitis. Palpation of bone
with a metal probe would also signify osteomyelitis. If the situation
is unclear as to the presence of an
Surgical intervention
Surgery, which can consist of
drainage, debridement, and often
amputation, is important for preserving tissue, maximizing revascularization, and promoting healing.28 The goal of early, aggressive
debridement and drainage is to remove all necrotic soft tissue and
bone.2 Even for patients with poor
circulatory status, it is important
to establish dependent drainage to
prevent pooling of pus. There is no
evidence to support soaking an ulcerated foot in a whirlpool or other hydrotherapies.2 In fact, such
measures could result in maceration, infection, or burns. The decision to perform surgery must be
made with caution because, while
the intervention can remove the
source of infection, too much manipulation can impair healing by
further damaging the tissues.28
Prevention Is Key
Glycemic control is paramount
in the prevention of diabetic neuropathy and the development of
diabetic foot ulcers. A chronically
elevated blood glucose concentration is the initial factor that sets in
motion the pathogenic process of
neuropathy.
Diabetic patients must be instructed about proper and consistent foot care to prevent ulcers.
Feet should be kept clean and dry
at all times. Patients with neuropathy should not walk barefoot,
even in the home. Properly fitted
shoes are essential. This is a particular problem with women, since
an adequate shoe is not often stylish. Patients should be told to inspect their feet carefully daily for
callus, infection, abrasions, foreign bodies, or blisters and to consult the physician about any potentially troublesome lesion.
The National Diabetes Education Program recommends that all
patients with diabetes have a thorough foot examination at least annually to assess the condition of the
skin and nails and to evaluate for
the presence of any sensory or
skeletal abnormalities.32 Proprioception and standardized sensory
evaluation should be performed to
help identify patients at risk. Standardized sensory evaluation is best
accomplished with the SemmesWeinstein monofilament at various locations of the foot, including the toes, the metatarsal head
area, and the heel. High-risk patients are defined as those who lack
palpable pedal pulses, have abnor-
Conclusion
Peripheral diabetic neuropathy
affects nearly one third of all patients with diabetes. Foot ulceration
is a preventable complication in
those with peripheral neuropathy.
Better understanding of the pathophysiologic basis of foot ulcers can
References
1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National diabetes fact sheet: general
information and national estimates on diabetes in the United States, 2003. Rev ed. Atlanta, Ga: U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2004.
2. http://www.diabetes.org/info/diabetesinfo.jsp.
3. Gordois A, Scuffham P, Shearer A, et al.
The health care costs of diabetic peripheral
neuropathy in the U.S. Diabetes Care.
2003;26:1790-1795.
4. Greene DA, Lattimer SA, Sima AA. Sorbitol, phosphoinositides, and sodium-potassium-ATPase in the pathogenesis of diabetic
complications. N Engl J Med. 1987;316:
599-606.
5. Kador PF, Kinoshita JH. Role of aldose
reductase in the development of diabetesassociated complications. Am J Med. 1985;
79(suppl 5A):8-12.
6. Greene DA, Lattimer SA. Action of
sorbinil in diabetic peripheral nerve. Relationship of polyol (sorbitol) pathway inhibition to a myoinositol-mediated defect in
sodium-potassium ATPase activity. Diabetes.
1984;33:712-716.
7. Vlassara H. Protein glycation in the kidney: role in diabetes and aging. Kidney Int.
1996;49:1795-1804.
8. Brownlee M. Lilly Lecture 1993. Glycation and diabetic complications. Diabetes.
1994;43:836-841.
9. Inoguchi T, Battan R, Handler E, et al.
Preferential elevation of protein kinase C
isoform II and diacylglycerol levels in the
aorta and heart of diabetic rats: differential
reversibility to glycemic control by islet cell
transplantation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
1992;89:11059-11063.
10. Wolf BA, Williamson JR, Eamon RA, et
al. Diacylglycerol accumulation and microvascular abnormalities induced by elevated glucose levels. J Clin Invest. 1991;87:31-38.
11. Sumpio BE. Foot ulcers. N Engl J Med.
2000;343:787-793.
12. Boulton AJM. The pathogenesis of diabetic foot problems: an overview. Diabet
Med. 1996;13(suppl 1):S12-S16.
13. Collier JH, Brodbeck CA. Assessing the
diabetic foot: plantar callus and pressure
sensation. Diabetes Educ. 1993;19:503-508.
14. Stess RM, Jensen SR, Mirmiran R. The
role of dynamic plantar pressures in diabetic
foot ulcers. Diabetes Care. 1997;20:855-858.
15. Bornmyr S, Svensson H, Lilja B, et al.
Cutaneous vasomotor responses in young
type I diabetic patients. J Diabetes Complications. 1997;11:21-26.
16. Purewal TS, Goss DE, Watkins PJ, et al.
Lower limb venous pressure in diabetic neuropathy. Diabetes Care. 1995;18:377-381.
17. Uccioli L, Mancini L, Giordano A, et al.
Lower limb arterio-venous shunts, autonomic neuropathy and diabetic foot. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1992;16:123-130.
18. Spallone V, Uccioli L, Menzinger G.
Diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Diabetes
Metab Rev. 1995;11:227-257.
19. Singer AJ, Clark RAF. Cutaneous wound
(4):CD003556.
27. Stoddard SR, Sherman RA, Mason BE,
et al. Maggot debridement therapy. An alternative treatment for nonhealing ulcers. J Am
Podiatr Med Assoc. 1995;85:218-221.
28. Hollingshead TS. Pathophysiology and
treatment of diabetic foot ulcer. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 1991;8:843-855.
29. Joseph WS. Treatment of lower extremity infections in diabetics. Drugs. 1991;42:
984-996.
30. Lipsky BA, Itani K, Norden C. Linezolid
Diabetic Foot Infections Study Group.
Treating foot infections in diabetic patients:
a randomized, multicenter, open-label trial
of linezolid versus ampicillin-sulbactam/
amoxicillin-clavulanate. Clin Infect Dis.
2004;38:17-24.
31. Kapor-Drezgic J, Zhou X, Babazono T,
et al. Effect of high glucose on mesangial cell
protein kinase C- and - is polyol pathwaydependent. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1999;10:
1193-1203.
32. National Diabetes Education Program.
http://ndep.nih.gov.
33. Mayfield JA, Reiber GE, Sanders LJ, et
al. American Diabetes Association. Position
statement. Preventive foot care in diabetes.
Diabetes Care. 2004;27(suppl 1):S63-S64.
The Diabetic Foot Ulcer: Management and Prevention Strategies in Primary Care
REGISTRATION FORM
There is no charge for this CME-CE activity.
In order to obtain credit, participants are required to:
(1) Read the learning objectives, review the activity, and complete the self-assessment quiz.
(2) Complete this registration form and the activity evaluation form on the following page, and record your
test answers in the box below.
(3) Send the registration and evaluation forms to:
UMDNJ-Center for Continuing and Outreach Education
via mail:
PO Box 1709, Newark, NJ 07101-1709
via fax:
973-972-7128
(4) Retain a copy of your test answers. Your answer sheet will be graded and if a passing score of 70% or
more is achieved, a CME-CE credit letter awarding AMA/PRA category 1 credit, nursing continuing education credit, pharmacy continuing education credit, and the test answer key will be mailed to you within
four (4) to six (6) weeks. Individuals who fail to attain a passing score will be notified and offered the opportunity to complete the activity again.
SELF-ASSESSMENT TEST
Circle the best answer for each question on pages 10-11.
1.
A
B
C
D
E
6.
2.
A
B
C
D
E
7.
3.
A
B
C
D
E
8.
4.
A
B
C
D
E
9.
5.
A
B
C
D
E
10.
A
A
A
A
A
B
B
B
B
B
C
C
C
C
C
D
D
D
D
D
E
E
E
E
E
REGISTRATION
First Name
Daytime Phone
Fax
M.I.
Last Name
Degree
Evening Phone
E-mail
State
Zip Code
Affiliation, Specialty
I attest that I have completed the activity The Diabetic Foot Ulcer: Management and Prevention Strategies in
Primary Care as designed and I am claiming 1.0 AMA/PRA category 1 credit.
Signature
Date
The Diabetic Foot Ulcer: Management and Prevention Strategies in Primary Care
ACTIVITY EVALUATION FORM
The planning and execution of useful and educationally sound continuing education activities are guided in
large part by input from participants. To assist us in evaluating the effectiveness of this activity and to make recommendations for future educational offerings, please take a few moments to complete this evaluation form.
Your response will help ensure that future programs are informative and meet the educational needs of all participants. Please note: CE credit letters and long-term credit retention information will only be issued upon receipt of this completed evaluation form. Thank you for your cooperation!
PROGRAM OBJECTIVES: Having completed this activity, are you better able to:
Discuss the causes and risk factors of foot ulcer in diabetic patients
Determine the severity of foot ulcer in a particular patient
List application of appropriate treatment
Describe measures to prevent occurrence of foot ulcer
OVERALL EVALUATION:
The information presented increased my awareness/understanding of the subject.
The information presented will influence how I practice.
The information presented will help me improve patient care.
The faculty demonstrated current knowledge of the subject.
The program was educationally sound and scientifically balanced.
The program avoided commercial bias or influence.
Overall, the program met my expectations.
I would recommend this program to my colleagues.
Strongly
Agree
5
5
5
5
Strongly
Disagree
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
Strongly
Agree
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
1
1
1
1
Strongly
Disagree
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
If you anticipate changing one or more aspects of your practice as a result of your participation in this activity,
please provide us with a brief description of how you plan to do so.
Please provide any additional comments pertaining to this activity (positives and negatives) and suggestions for
improvement:
Please list any topics that you would like to be addressed in future educational activities:
Please comment on the aspects of this activity that contributed toward improving your professional effectiveness and ability to communicate with and council patients and/or monitor patient disease status.
Please list any specific areas of the activity that could be improved to assist us in providing valuable education
to the pharmacy community.