Exam Marking Schedule
Exam Marking Schedule
Exam Marking Schedule
Department of Construction
BACHELOR OF CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMME
2014 EXAMINATION
SUBJECT:
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 1
SHEET:
1 of 16 plus Question 1 A3
Programme and Question 3 (a)
Graph paper
DATE:
DURATION:
Assessment breakdown:
2 Hours
This examination 30
Other 70
MARKING SCHEDULE
COURSE REPORT
10 minutes reading time will be allowed before commencement of this
examination.
This is an open book examination.
Answer ALL questions. Answer Question 2 (a-c) on the chart provided and
Question 3 (a) on the blank graph paper provided.
Non programmable electronic calculators are permitted.
The following texts are permitted: Any
Start each question on a new page and write on one side of the paper only.
Upon completion of this examination, ensure that on the front page of your answer
book you have ticked the questions that you have completed, and also recorded
your student ID number, subject and subject code.
Before handing in your script, ensure that your student ID number is on the top of
any loose pages, and that all pages are attached and in the correct order.
Page 2 of 13
PART A
QUESTION 1
(Total 15 marks)
Scenario
You have been asked by your construction manager to write a
project report explaining the intended action you intend to
implement to resolve some programme difficulties.
The client requires the project complete at the original time and as
this client is extremely important to your company, your CM has
agreed to fully investigate the possibilities.
Take into consideration the following:
i.
ii.
iii.
5 days
3 days
2 days
1 day
5 days
4 days
3 days
Quantify what impact each extension above has on the critical path
and suggest a suitable action. Acceptable actions include:
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
overlap tasks,
introduce another team,
use contingency,
use float,
work available Saturdays
(15 marks)
Page 3 of 13
Answers:
(a) Sample overlap solution, there will be solutions involving, using Contingency,
using Saturdays and any other efficencies.
Status date 30/6/14
Task
Status
Problem
Solution
As this task will now finish
on the 4 July, to minimise
damage to critical path
overlap2.3 to start before
completion of 2.2. Start 2.3
on Weds 2 July, this will
minimise delay to two days
With 2.3 now starting on 2
July but being extended by 3
days the new completion
date for 2.3 is Weds 9 July.
Task 2.4 is able to start on 8
July and will finish on 16
Wed July
Task 2.6 is now 4 days long,
by overlapping with 2.4 and
starting on 15July it will be
complete on 18 July. By
adding up all delays to date
we have 11 days which
should take us to 14 July.
We have finished 2.6 on 18,
we have recovered 7 days
but still need to recover
another 4 days between now
and completion .Solution
overlap tasks 3.1,3.2,3.3,3.4
by one day each will recover
the 4 days to bring complete
back to its original date.
Page 4 of 13
QUESTION 2
(Total 15 marks)
(5 marks)
(b)
(4 marks)
(4 marks)
If two or more links are converging into one node and there are two
or more early start dates, which figure do you use for the pass
forward calculation.
(1 mark)
(1 mark)
(c)
(d)
(e)
Task Name
Award contract
Site establishment
Bulk cut site to RL
Excavate Foundations
Box Reo Pour fdts
Lay header blocks and grout
Under slab services
Backfill
Prep Slab
Pour slab
Erect timber frames
Erect roof trusses
Complete roof structure
Install roofing
Exterior windows and doors
Complete exterior cladding
1st fix services
Interior Finishes
Fit off and hardware
Inspections and Remedials
Handover complete
Duration
0 days
5 days
4 days
2 day
8 days
2 days
2days
5 days
2 days
1 day
5 days
3 days
2 days
5 days
5 days
8 days
5 days
12
5
5
0
Predecessors
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
7,8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
14
14,16,17
18
19
20
Page 5 of 13
Answers:
1
0
0
Award
0
0
WBS Name
ES Duration
LS
Float
Node template
0
0
2
0
0
Answer
Site Est
5
0
3
5
5
ID
5
5
7
21
21
U/S servs
2
0
23
23
12
36
36
Trusses
3
0
Bulk cut
4
0
9
9
8
23
23
4
9
9
Exc.Fdts
2
0
11
11
5
11
11
Box Reo
Blockwork
8
0
6
19
19
Headr
Blk
U/S
Servs
2
0
39
39
17
46
54
51
59
Backfill
5
0
28
28
13
39
39
Roof Strt.
2
0
41
41
18
59
59
Int. finish
12
0
71
71
9
28
28
Prep slab
2
0
30
30
14
41
41
Roofing
5
0
46
46
19
19
10
30
30
Pour slab
1
0
31
31
15
46
46
Windows
5
0
21
21
11
31
31
Erect walls
5
0
36
36
16
51
51
Cladding
8
0
21
81
81
51
51
19
71
71
Fit off
5
0
76
76
59
59
20
76
76
Inspect
5
0
81
81
EF
LF
Page 6 of 13
Handover
0
0
81
81
Page 7 of 13
PART B
(Total 20 marks)
Analyse the two case studies below using the framework of Quality
Systems.
(a)
Describe one event, activity or decision that falls under each of the
headings of:
i) TQM
ii) Quality Assurance
iii) Quality Control
iv) Third Party Inspection.
(1 mark)
(1 mark)
(1 mark)
(1 mark)
You can select from either of the case studies or just one.
(b)
(c)
Justify why each of the events, activities or decisions fit under the
chosen Quality Systems headings.
(8 marks)
(8 marks)
Page 8 of 13
Page 9 of 13
Answers:
1 mark for each identification
2 marks for each justification
1 mark for contribution with a half a mark for a relevant service example
e.g. Possible answers
i)
a) The lack of use of a commissioning management organisation in Project B
shows a lack of TQM.
b) TQM indicates a desire for continual improvement requires a commitment to
commissioning at the outset. A commissioning management organisation would
have a focus on achieving quality from the outset of the project and illustrates a
commitment at the highest level of the organisation. Failure to employ one shows
a lack of interest in improving.
c) The absence probably meant a lack of a clear commissioning plan for the
airconditioning system which may have not maintained comfortable conditions
early in its occupancy
ii)
a) The after handover modifications in Project A indicate a lack of Quality
Control.
b) Quality Control activities include Self Checking by the installers rather than
by a third party. The need for modifications later in the project show that this
Shelf checking had not been done.
c) If these had been checked by the installers it could have avoided the need for
the modifications after handover. This could easily have meant that fans were
not operating to the right level before air balancing was started.
iii)
a) Quality Assurance processes were in place in project A.
b) This is demonstrated by the fact that the Commissioning Engineer identified
modifications during the installation. These checks would have been part of a
Quality Assurance process.
c) It did not help because the modifications were ignored. This could have
identified modifications to links between the airconditioning system and fire
protection system.
Page 10 of 13
iv)
a) Third party inspection was clearly present in Project B
b) The checking by the commissioning engineers identified snags that needed
fixing. Commissioning engineers checking other peoples work is third party
inspection.
c)) This would have contributed to the delay of handover as work needed to be
corrected. Faults with the building controls were identified.
Examiners Comment
Generally quite well answered. There were some excellent responses connecting
principles to actual events in the case studies.
Some students failed to make any connection to the case studies at all simply restating content from notes. As this was an open book exam, this approach was not
showing the depth of understanding required and generally failed to earn half marks.
There were few answers that really demonstrated complete understanding by failing
to give an example of an actual service in section c). An number were broad
references to HVAC but a more detailed aspect considering for example, cooling
equipment or fan capacity was needed
(b)
(6 marks)
(14 marks)
Answers:
a) i) O&M document the building its services and its commissioning state
at handover. BWoF document the acceptable ongoing maintenance of the
building in its life. (2 marks)
ii) O&Ms are created by the services subcontractor and main contractor.
BWoF are initially completed by the same but then updated by an IQP
(2 marks)
iii)The building maintenance operative will use O&Ms to maintain the
building or consultants to involved in upgrading or subdividing. BWOf
are used by the owner to demonstrate compliance with the Code to the
public. (2 marks)
b) 2 marks for each realistic challenge applied to a relevant service in the
building
Semester 1, 2014 Marking Schedule
Page 11 of 13
Page 12 of 13
ID
Network Template
Award
0
WBS Name
ES Duration
LS
Float
Node template
Site Est
5
U/S servs
2
0
12
Trusses
3
17
Bulk cut
4
Backfill
5
13
Roof Strt.
2
18
Int. finish
12
Exc.Fdts
2
Prep slab
2
14
Roofing
5
Box Reo
8
10
Pour slab
1
15
Windows
5
19
Fit off
5
Header Blk
2
11
Erect walls
5
16
Cladding
8
20
Inspect
5
21
EF
LF
Page 13 of 13
Handover
0