The document discusses hollow fiber membranes and their fabrication process. It provides advantages of hollow fiber membranes over flat sheet membranes including larger membrane area per volume, ability to withstand backwashing, and ease of handling. The fabrication of hollow fiber membranes is more complex than flat sheets due to requirements for higher dope viscosity. Phase inversion occurs internally upon extrusion and externally upon exposure to coagulants. Process parameters like dope formulation, spinning conditions and coagulation chemistry impact membrane morphology and performance. Common materials for hollow fibers include PVDF which has excellent properties for various separation applications.
The document discusses hollow fiber membranes and their fabrication process. It provides advantages of hollow fiber membranes over flat sheet membranes including larger membrane area per volume, ability to withstand backwashing, and ease of handling. The fabrication of hollow fiber membranes is more complex than flat sheets due to requirements for higher dope viscosity. Phase inversion occurs internally upon extrusion and externally upon exposure to coagulants. Process parameters like dope formulation, spinning conditions and coagulation chemistry impact membrane morphology and performance. Common materials for hollow fibers include PVDF which has excellent properties for various separation applications.
The document discusses hollow fiber membranes and their fabrication process. It provides advantages of hollow fiber membranes over flat sheet membranes including larger membrane area per volume, ability to withstand backwashing, and ease of handling. The fabrication of hollow fiber membranes is more complex than flat sheets due to requirements for higher dope viscosity. Phase inversion occurs internally upon extrusion and externally upon exposure to coagulants. Process parameters like dope formulation, spinning conditions and coagulation chemistry impact membrane morphology and performance. Common materials for hollow fibers include PVDF which has excellent properties for various separation applications.
The document discusses hollow fiber membranes and their fabrication process. It provides advantages of hollow fiber membranes over flat sheet membranes including larger membrane area per volume, ability to withstand backwashing, and ease of handling. The fabrication of hollow fiber membranes is more complex than flat sheets due to requirements for higher dope viscosity. Phase inversion occurs internally upon extrusion and externally upon exposure to coagulants. Process parameters like dope formulation, spinning conditions and coagulation chemistry impact membrane morphology and performance. Common materials for hollow fibers include PVDF which has excellent properties for various separation applications.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5
Why choose HF Membrane
Compared with conventional flat-sheet membranes, the hollow fiber
membranes configuration offers several advantages: 1. A larger membrane area per unit volume of membrane module, which results in a higher productivity 2. Good self-mechanical support to withstand back washing for liquid separation 3. Ease of handling during module fabrication and process operation (T.S. Chung. (2008). Fabrication of hollow fiber membranes by phase inversion. In: Advanced Membrane Technology and Applications, N. Li et al. (Eds.), John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, pp. 821841.) (T. Matsuura. (1994). Synthetic Membranes and Membrane Separation Processing. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.) (N. Peng, N. Widjojo, P. Sukitpaneenit, M.M. Teoh, G.G. Lipscomb, T.S. Chung, and J.Y. Lai. (2012). Evolution of polymeric hollow fibers as sustainable technologies: Past, present, and future, Prog. Polym. Sci. 37: 14011424.)
Fabrication prosess of HF Membrane
The phase inversion process of hollow fiber membranes is much more complex than that of flat sheet membranes, one essential difference is the dope formulation that effects the dope viscosity. Usually, a polymer dope possessing a viscosity of a few hundred centipoises (x10 -1 Pa.s) is sufficient for casting a flat-sheet membrane. However, the minimum dope viscosity required for spinning hollow fibers in an order of magnitude higer, that is, a few thousand centipoises (Pa.s) (N. Peng, N. Widjojo, P. Sukitpaneenit, M.M. Teoh, G.G. Lipscomb, T.S. Chung, and J.Y. Lai. (2012). Evolution of polymeric hollow fibers as sustainable technologies: Past, present, and future, Prog. Polym. Sci. 37: 14011424.) (T.S. Chung. (2008). Fabrication of hollow fiber membranes by phase inversion. In: Advanced Membrane Technology and Applications, N. Li et al. (Eds.), John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, pp. 821841.) Neglecting the moisture-induced phase inversion involved in the membrane fabrication, phase inversion starts from the top surface of a cast film after immersing in a coagulation bath. On the contrary, for hollow fiber membranes produced through NIPS, phase inversion starts immediately at the lumen side of the nascent fiber upon extrusion from a spinneret by the internal coagulant (here after referred to as bore fluid). Subsequently, the nascent fiber contact with the external coagulant and induce phase separation at the outer surface of the hollow fibers. (P. Sukitpaneenit at al. (2015). PVDF Hollow fiber membrane formation and production. In: Membrane Fabrication, N. Hilal et al. (Eds.), CRC Press Taylor and Francis Group. Pp. 215-148.)
Generally, the presence of macrovoids in hollow fiber membrane is
undesirable, because they are considered as weak mechanical regions, which possibly lead to membrane failure under high pressures or vibrational operation. (P. Sukitpaneenit at al. (2015). PVDF Hollow fiber membrane formation and production. In: Membrane Fabrication, N. Hilal et al. (Eds.), CRC Press Taylor and Francis Group. Pp. 215-148.) (O.M. Ekiner and G. Vassilatos. (1990). Polyaramide hollow fibers for hydrogen/methane separation-spinning and properties, J. Memb. Sci. 53: 259273.) (N. Peng, T.S. Chung, and K.Y. Wang. (2008). Macrovoid evolution and critical factors to form macrovoid-free hollow fiber membranes, J. Memb. Sci. 318: 363372.) (D.T. Clausi and W.J. Koros. (2000). Formation of defect-free polyimide hollow fiber membranes for gas separations, J. Memb. Sci. 167: 7989.) The hollow fiber spinning process comprises of a large number of control parameters throughout the entire process chain of dope formulation, coagulation chemistry, and spinneret design, to the spinning parameters such as air gap and take up speed. Commercially available polymeric hollow fiber membranes are usually spun from a hot spinneret with a certain air gap distance, coupled with a moderat take up speed. (T.S. Chung. (2008). Fabrication of hollow fiber membranes by phase inversion. In: Advanced Membrane Technology and Applications, N. Li et al. (Eds.), John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, pp. 821841.) (N. Peng, N. Widjojo, P. Sukitpaneenit, M.M. Teoh, G.G. Lipscomb, T.S. Chung, and J.Y. Lai. (2012). Evolution of polymeric hollow fibers as sustainable technologies: Past, present, and future, Prog. Polym. Sci. 37: 14011424.) Typical hollow fiber membrane spinning line for the fabrication of polymeric hollow fiber through NIPS. Once the polymer dope solution is mixed homogenously and then allowed to degas overnight, the hollow fiber spinning process is usually cconducted as follows: (1) metering the polymer solution and bore fluid by different precision pumps; (2) extruding the dope solution and bore fluid through a spinneret; (3) expriencing internal coagulation when the dope contacs with the bore fluid exiting from the spinneret; (4) encountrring solvent evaporation/moisture induced phase separation at the outer surface of nascent fibers in the air gap region; (5) stretching of fibers by gravity and elongation tensions induced by the air gap and take up units; (6) completing phase inversion and the solidification of as spun fibers in the external coagulation bath; (7) collecting as spun fibers at the roller that controls the take up speed of the spinning process; and (8) employing solvent exchange or additional
posttratments to remove residual solvent/additives and control membrane
pore size. Portray in figure 7.1.
The enlarged region near the spinneret during the membrane formation is illustrated in figure 7.2.
The polymer dope solution experiences at least three external stresses
during the spinning process, which subsequently effect the morphology and performance of the as spun fiber. These stresses are classified as follows: (1) shear and elongation stresses at the spinneret; (2) stresses induced by gravity at the air gap; and (3) stresses induced by the teke up roller and coagulant bath. (P. Sukitpaneenit at al. (2015). PVDF Hollow fiber membrane formation and production. In: Membrane Fabrication, N. Hilal et al. (Eds.), CRC Press Taylor and Francis Group. Pp. 215-148.)
Materials of Hollow Fiber Membrane
PVDF (Polyvinylidene Fluoride) Poly(vinylidene fluoride) is one of the promising polymeric materials that has prominently emerged in membrane research and development (R & D) due to its excellent chemical and physical properties such as highly hydrophobic nature, robust mechanical strength, good thermal stability and superior chemical resistance. To date, PVDF hollow fiber membranes have dominated the production of modern microfiltration (MF); ultrafiltration (UF); membrane bioreactor (MBR) membrane for municipal water and wastewater treatment; and separation in food, beverage, dairy, and wine industries. In the last two decades, increasing effort has been made in the development of PVDF hollow fiber in other separation applications such as membrane contractors, membrane distillation (MD) and pervaporation.
(P. Sukitpaneenit at al. (2015). PVDF Hollow fiber membrane formation
and production. In: Membrane Fabrication, N. Hilal et al. (Eds.), CRC Press Taylor and Francis Group. Pp. 215-148.) (S. Atchariyawut, R. Jiraratananon, and R. Wang. (2007). Separation of CO2 from CH4 by using gas-liquid membrane contacting process, J. Memb. Sci. 304: 163172.) (S. Rajabzadeh, S. Yoshimoto, M. Teramoto, M. Al-Marzouqi, and H. Matsuyama. (2009). CO2 absorption by using PVDF hollow fiber membrane contactors with various membrane structures, Sep. Purif. Technol. 69: 210220.) (M. Khayet and T. Matsuura. (2011). Membrane Distillation: Principles and Applications. Elsevier, New York.) (K. Schneider and T.S. Van Gassel. (1984). Membrane distillation, Chem. Eng. Technol. 56: 514521.) (S. Bonyadi and T.S. Chung. (2007). Flux enhancement in membrane distillation by fabrication of dual layer hydrophilic-hydrophobic hollow fiber membranes, J. Memb. Sci. 306: 134146.) (K.Y. Wang, T.S. Chung, and M. Gryta. (2008). Hydrophobic PVDF hollow fiber membranes with narrow pore size distribution and ultra-thin skin for the fresh water production through membrane distillation, Chem. Eng. Sci. 63: 25872594.) (P. Sukitpaneenit, T.S. Chung, and L.Y. Jiang. (2010). Modified pore-flow model for pervaporation mass transport in PVDF hollow fiber membranes for ethanol-water separation, J. Memb. Sci. 362: 393406.) (P. Sukitpaneenit and T.S. Chung. (2011). Molecular design of the morphology and pore size of PVDF hollow fiber membranes for ethanolwater separation employing the modified pore-flow concept, J. Memb. Sci. 374: 6782.)