Philosophy and Physicists Dreams of Unification.: Periodic Table of Elements Standard Model

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

unification

1 of 4

http://molaire1.perso.sfr.fr/e_unification.html

Philosophy and physicists dreams of unification.


Physicists have a secret dream: To be able to explain all phenomena in the Universe
with the minimum number of elements: Reduce the number of particles (see the
supercords theory) and the number of interactions to one. This quest, is it utopian or
realisable?
The Universe, does it restrict itself to a fixed number of simple laws, hidden from our
eyes, but accessible with our more and more sophisticated technology?
Or is the Universe infinitely complex, essentially unknowable, and giving up nothing but
scraps of partial understanding? We would then be like a spectator, knowing the world
only by the chinese shadows projected on the wall (the platonic myth of the cavern, do
you know it?)
Scientists, with an enthusiastic optimism, bet more for a knowable Universe
where the apparent complexity can, with a little luck, be reduced to a few basic
laws. In effect, the history of material science could give the impression of an evolution towards
unification:
The multiplicity of natural materials (metals, stones, liquids...) has been explained by the atomic
theory and all matter has found its foundations in the periodic table of elements.
Atoms and the numerous particles discovered with the aid of the colliders have been disected,
classified and reduced to a small number in the Standard Model.
The same evolution has occured concerning the forces which govern our Universe:
Newton explained in 1687 that the astonomical force of attraction and terrestrial gravity are nothing
but one and the same interaction called gravitational interaction.
After Oersted, Maxwell expleined in 1873 that magnetism, electricity and light are nothing but
different manifestations of the same single interaction called the electromagnetic interaction.

8/27/2015 2:00 PM

unification

2 of 4

http://molaire1.perso.sfr.fr/e_unification.html

THE GRAND PROJET FOR THE UNIFICATION OF THE


INTERACTIONS

This evolution towards the unification of forces may actually come to be understood following two
different approaches:
the synthetic approach: the interactions observable by physicists would be nothing but different
aspects of a single and same original force (the Superforce!)
the historical approach: All of the interactions being unified at the birth of the Universe (the famous
big bang), but having differentiated themselves since then.
In reality, these two approaches come together: Why? Because at the origin of the Universe, the density of
energy was such that all of the interactions where effectively unified.
We are going to discover the different stages of this unification of forces, then discover with wonder, the
birth of the Universe with the big bang...

The electroweak interaction


Our Standard Model finally describes only 4 interactions?
False. In reality, and since 1967, the weak and electromagnetic interactions have been unified by the
theory of the electroweak interaction.

In 1979, two American physicists (Sheldon Lee Glashow and Steven Weinberg) and a pakistani physicist
(Abdus Salam) received the Nobel Physics Prize for their theoretical work which in 1967 unified the weak
and electromagnetic interactions.

8/27/2015 2:00 PM

unification

3 of 4

http://molaire1.perso.sfr.fr/e_unification.html

The interactions are modelled mathematically in the form of a field of forces having a "gauge symmetry".

Without going into the detail and to spare you a good migraine, we can say that this gauge symmetry
is "a group of mathematical transformations for which the dynamic of particles is invariant".
The important thing to understand here is that our Nobel Physics prize winners demonstrated that the
gauge field from the weak interaction was structurally identical to the electromagnetic field. Now the
symmetry which invoked the weak electric theory imposed 4 mediator bosons of null mass: the photon,
the Zo and the two W.
This is in contradiction to the facts. In 1983, Carlo Rubbia at CERN had discovered the bosons Zo and W
predicted by the theory, but these had a mass (anticipated!), and even an enormous mass in the order of 90
times that of the proton!
How from here do we reconcile this mass of the Zo and W with the electroweak theory?
Physicists are cunning, and they simply invented a new force field called the Higgs field (the name of the
Scottish physicist Peter Higgs) which manifests itself by the intermediary of a mysterious boson evidently
called the Higgs boson. This field only exists with the intermediary bosons Zo, W- and W+ to give them a
mass, but which does not pair with the photon, preserving therefore its null mass. Once the Higgs field
manifests itself, the two interactions, electromagnetic and weak, distinguish themselves from one another.
We say that there is a break of symmetry.
From the moment that the Higgs mechanism is introduced into the equations, the electroweak theory
functions perfectly well. It has permitted to be predicted, with precision, the mass of intermediary bosons
well before their discovery by Rubbia.
Only weak point: the Higgs boson has never yet been detected and its existence is
indespensible to validate the electroweak theory. We hope for its discovery thanks
to the LHC hadron supercollider of CERN, operational in 2005.
The discovery of the Higgs boson will require enormous energies in the order of
100 GeV (GigaelectronVolts). Only the future LHC will be capable of recreating in
its womb an environment of such energy density. Now it is at this energetic scale
that physicists could maybe observe the appearance of the Higgs boson, because
these 100 GeV correspond with its estimated mass (don't forget E = mc !).

The electronuclear interaction


That leaves us with just the gravitational, strong and electroweak interactions.
The electronuclear interaction is also named the Grand Unification Theory or GUT. It unifies the
strong and electroweak interactions.

This theory was proposed for the first time by Sheldon Glashow (him again) and Howard Georgi in 1973.
Other versions have been proposed since: the one the most in vogue at present bears the subdued name of

8/27/2015 2:00 PM

unification

4 of 4

http://molaire1.perso.sfr.fr/e_unification.html

SU(5). This interaction is only possible at levels of enormous energy (more than 1016 GeV for the
connoisseurs!), conditions which only existed at the very start of the big bang.

The SU(5) theory and leptoquarks


Because this theory groups together 5 particles (the electron, the neutrino and the
d antiquarks of each colour) in a fundamental quintuplet. The other particles would
be grouped in a decuplet.
The symmetry of the GUT would permit the invariance of nature by the
permutation of a lepton (electron, neutrino...) with a quark: To put it plainly, leptons
and quarks of the quintuplet would be transformable, one to another, and these
transitions could be possible by the intermediary of new bosons called
leptoquarks. These leptoquarks would then be bosons carrying a colour charge and
a fractional electric charge.
This theory would permit explanation of the troubling fact that the value of the negative electric charge
(Q= -1) of an electron corresponds to the same positive value (Q= +1) of the proton.
This theory predicts an appalling event: the proton, symbol of stability of matter, should
have a limited lifetime! This lifetime would be 1031yrs; knowing that the Universe was
born around 1010 years ago, there is still some spare time, phew! Enormous swimming-pool
proton disintegration detectors have therefore been constructed: A proton emits two
photons g and a positron e+ when it disintegrates; now the positron emits a blue luminous
cone in water (Cerenkov effect for the connoisseurs) which photo-multipliers can detect.
Alas, for the moment, no positive results have been announced, which rends this GUT theory much less
solid than the electroweak theory.

The GUT theory could then unify all interactions except gravitation.
The theory which includes gravitation in one superforce exists: it is called the "theory of Everyhing". Lest
look at this physicists dream...

8/27/2015 2:00 PM

You might also like