Evidence Based Critical Care

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 6
At a glance
Powered by AI
The key takeaways are that critical care nursing has evolved over the past 60 years with developments in medical technology and interventions, leading to the establishment of specialized critical care units. Evidence-based practice is also discussed as an important framework for improving quality and outcomes in critical care.

Over time, critical care nursing has developed from ad hoc care of critically ill patients wherever they were, to the establishment of specialized medical/surgical intensive care units with trained nursing staff using specialized equipment. Guidelines and standards of practice have also been established.

Evidence-based practice has provided an important framework for integrating research evidence with clinical expertise to improve quality and cost-effectiveness of care for critically ill patients. It has moved practice away from traditional methods based on folklore and trial-and-error towards standardized, evidence-informed guidelines.

Evidence Based

Practice on Critical
Care
A DISCUSSION ON NURSING
PREETAM SAHA

Evidence Based Practice on Critical Care

Table of Contents
Introduction..................................................................................................................................2
Evidence-based practice on critical care......................................................................................2
Conclusion...................................................................................................................................4
References....................................................................................................................................5

Evidence Based Practice on Critical Care


Introduction
Near about 60 years ago, nursing was organized on a critical position. Before that, critical care
nursing was mainly focused on wherever there were critically ill patients. As the years pass the
development of new medical intervention and technology make us realize that monitoring and
observation for critically ill patients are a really important matter of nursing. Many physicians on
these days greatly depended on a nurse for taking care of critical changes of the patients in the
absence of physicians. Many times physicians also depend on the nurse for initiating emergency
medical treatment. The modern medical technologies and interventions have greatly developed
and, for this reason, many hospitals are organizing separate units for making efficient use of
equipment with the trained staff. Medical and surgical intensive care units transfer the critically
ill patients to the nurse who has the specialized knowledge regarding on that area of care. Every
hospital should have the specialized nursing care units where the physicians formerly reserved
for the critically ill patients and it should be built on the virtue of their knowledge and expertise.

Evidence-based practice on critical care


The promotion of quality and cost effective outcome of the health care system for the families
should not be the ultimate goal of the evidence-based practice (Lawson, 2009). Evidence-based
practice is the evolution form of the integrated research evidence with the best clinical expertise,
values and needs for the critically ill patients (Morton & Fontaine, 2009). The best research
evidence in generating the quality study is the feelings to address a practical problem.
Standardized guidelines for clinical practice are developed by the policy makers, professionals,
and consumers. A framework of critical care for nurses which is followed globally is established
by the AACN (American Association of critical- care nurses). Nursing practice significantly
3

Evidence Based Practice on Critical Care


depends on the condition of the patient and on the setting in which the nurses mainly belong to
(Brady, 2013).
In the early time medical and nursing as based on the non-traditional way. According to Specht
(2012), the traditions were folklore, trial, and error, gut instinct, and personal preference etc. At
many cases, the practice was often passed down from one generation to other. Non-scientific
critical care practice includes the use of a rectal tube to manage gastric residual volume and
aspiration risk, facial incontinence, an accuracy of assessment of body temperature, and
suctioning artificial airways for every 2 hours. If nurses want to deliver the highest quality of
care to their patients, EBP (Evidence Based Practice) is essential (Deutschman & Neligan, 2010).
Nowadays there are multiple changes in the healthcare system. Many hospitals are installing 5 to
10ml of normal saline before the endotracheal suctioning is done (Drain & Odom-Forren, 2009).
Although no research can find out the benefits of installing the normal saline and in many cases
researchers have found that the practice is potentially harmful. Many studies consider the
normal saline before endotracheal suctioning as the primary end point (Morton & Fontaine,
2009). These studies show that the level of oxygen on the installation of normal saline is
significantly lower than no installation of saline. An interesting finding on the base of these
studies is that the level of oxygen is returned to the baseline after 3 to 5 minutes at the end of the
suction process (Egerod, 2006).
Endotracheal intubation can be installed on the orotracheal or nasotracheal route. Every route has
its own advantages and disadvantages. The orotracheal route is mainly preferred because it is
rapid and a large tube can be used and it is frequently successful (Bucknall, Copnell, Shannon, &
McKinley, 2015). On the other hand blind nasotracheal route, however, in this route is also
preferred because of the comfort of the critical patient and it is usually tolerated by the critically
4

Evidence Based Practice on Critical Care


ill patient because it does not require any anesthesia. The recent introduction of non-invasive
positive-pressure ventilation (NPPV) is very successful and its use is widespread on the chronic
ventilator management. NPPV process has become the treatment for the patients who would be
managed by intubation or perhaps did not receive the ventilation at all. (Specht, 2012). The
advantages of the NPPV are- the improvement of the patient comfort avoid the complication of
endotracheal intubation and reduce needs for sedation. NPPV is very successful in the case of
respiratory failure and for the patients who are suffering from chronic obstructive palimony
disease (COPD). In a study nasal, ventilation is much more successful than controversial therapy
in lowering the Paco2 and reversing acidosis. But the ability to lower the percentage of NPPV
(9% vs. 30%; P=0.01) process is much higher. A number of studies have been demonstrated that
the need of intubation is reduced with the use of NPPV process and also the critically ill patients
can easily tolerate this process when acute respiratory failure situation occurs. (Rauen, Chulay,
Bridges, Vollman, & Arbour, 2008).

Conclusion
Many researchers have developed the EBP process for critically ill patients. Frequent questions
are asked about the scientific process, practice to the nurses to find out the answers. Once the
answer is found it left to nurses for the implementation. At last, the quality of health care system
will not improve by discovering new therapies but from discovering therapies that we are very
much aware.

Evidence Based Practice on Critical Care


References
Deutschman, C., & Neligan, P. (2010). Evidence-based practice of critical care. Philadelphia,
PA: Saunders/Elsevier.
Drain, C., & Odom-Forren, J. (2009). Perianesthesia nursing. St. Louis, Mo.: Saunders/Elsevier.
Morton, P., & Fontaine, D. (2009). Critical care nursing. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer
Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Brady, H. (2013). EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE. Dimensions Of Critical Care Nursing,
32(6), 287. doi:10.1097/dcc.0000000000000003
Egerod, I. (2006). Evidence-based practice and critical care nursing. Nursing In Critical Care,
11(3), 107-108. doi:10.1111/j.1362-1017.2006.00168.x
Lawson, P. (2009). Bringing evidence-based practice to the bedside. Nursing Critical Care, 4(5),
13-14. doi:10.1097/01.ccn.0000360666.10274.c8
Specht, D. (2012). Encourage evidence-based practice in direct care. Nursing Critical Care, 7(4),
14-16. doi:10.1097/01.ccn.0000415617.02321.77
Bucknall, T., Copnell, B., Shannon, K., & McKinley, D. (2015). Evidence based practice: are
critical care nurses ready for it? - PubMed - NCBI. Ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Retrieved 4 September
2015, from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11899640
Rauen, C., Chulay, M., Bridges, E., Vollman, K., & Arbour, R. (2008). Seven Evidence-Based
Practice Habits: Putting Some Sacred Cows Out to Pasture. Critical Care Nurse, 28(2), 98-123.
Retrieved from http://ccn.aacnjournals.org/content/28/2/98.full
6

You might also like