DO Circular 61 - New Rule On Inquest
DO Circular 61 - New Rule On Inquest
DO Circular 61 - New Rule On Inquest
SUBJECT :
Attached hereto for the information and guidance of all concerned is the
New Rules on Inquest which was prepared by a Committee constituted under
Department Order No. 43, dated February 2, 1993, supervised by Undersecretary
Ramon S. Esguerra, chaired and co-chaired by City Prosecutor JESUS F.
GUERRERO of Manila and Provincial Prosecutor MAURO M. CASTRO of
Rizal, respectively, with Assistant Chief State Prosecutor NILO C. M ARIANO,
Regional State Prosecutor CLARO A. ARELLANO, State Prosecutor
HERNANDO MASANGKAY, State Prosecutor ROGELIO F. VISTA, and
Prosecutor III APOLINARIO BRUSELAS, JR., as members, and approved by the
undersigned.
This Circular supersedes Department Circular No. 5, dated March 1, 1981,
and such other issuances inconsistent herewith.
This Circular shall take effect immediately.
Copyright 2010
SECTION 2.
Designation of Inquest Officers. The City or
Provincial Prosecutor shall designate the Prosecutors assigned to inquest duties
and shall furnish the Philippine National Police (PNP) a list of their names and
their schedule of assignments. If, however, there is only one Prosecutor in the area,
all inquest cases shall be referred to him for appropriate action.
Unless otherwise directed by the City or Provincial Prosecutor, those
assigned to inquest duties shall discharge their functions during the hours of their
designated assignments and only at the police stations/headquarters of the PNP in
order to expedite and facilitate the disposition of inquest cases.
SECTION 3.
Commencement and Termination of Inquest. The
inquest proceedings shall be considered commenced upon receipt by the Inquest
Officer from the law enforcement authorities of the complaint/referral documents
which should include:
a)
b)
c)
d)
The Inquest Officer shall, as far as practicable, cause the affidavit of arrest
and statements/affidavits of the complainant and the witnesses to be subscribed
and sworn to before him by the arresting officer and the affiants.
The inquest proceedings must be terminated within the period prescribed
under the provisions of Article 125 of the Revised Penal Code, as amended. 1
SECTION 4.
Particular Documents Required in Specific Cases.
The submission/presentation of the documents listed hereinbelow should, as far as
practicable, be required in the following cases by the Inquest Officer:
Murder, Homicide and Parricide
Copyright 2010
a)
b)
b)
c)
b)
c)
Theft and Robbery Cases, Violation of the Anti-Piracy and Anti-Highway Robbery
Law (PD 532) and Violation of the Anti-Fencing Law (PD 1612)
a)
b)
Copyright 2010
a)
b)
c)
b)
b)
b)
b)
scale sheets containing the volume and species of the forest products
confiscated, number of pieces and other important details such as
estimated value of the products confiscated;
b)
and
Natural
EHcaDT
c)
seizure receipt.
person 3 and, where the inquest is conducted outside of office hours, direct the law
enforcement agency concerned to file the case with the City or Provincial
Prosecutor for appropriate action.
SECTION 6.
Presence of the Detained Person. The presence of the
detained person who is under custody shall be ensured during the proceedings.
However, the production of the detained person before the Inquest Officer
may be dispensed with in the following cases:
a)
if he is confined in a hospital;
b)
c)
d)
b)
when an offense has in fact just been committed, and the arresting
officer has personal knowledge of facts indicating that the person to
be arrested has committed it.
For this purpose, the Inquest Officer may summarily examine the arresting
officers on the circumstances surrounding the arrest or apprehension of the
detained person.
Copyright 2010
SECTION 9.
Where Arrest Not Properly Effected. Should the
Inquest Officer find that the arrest was not made in accordance with the Rules, he
shall:
a)
b)
c)
d)
forward the same, together with the record of the case, to the City or
Provincial Prosecutor for appropriate action.
SECTION 11.
Inquest Proper. Where the detained person does not
opt for a preliminary investigation or otherwise refuses to execute the required
waiver. the Inquest Officer shall proceed with the inquest by examining the sworn
statements affidavits of the complainant and the witnesses and other supporting
evidence submitted to him.
If necessary, the Inquest Officer may require the presence of the
complainant and witnesses and subject them to an informal and summary
investigation or examination for purposes of determining the existence of probable
Copyright 2010
cause.
IEHSDA
SECTION 12.
Meaning of Probable Cause. Probable cause exists
when the evidence submitted to the Inquest Officer engenders a well-founded
belief that a crime has been committed and that the arrested or detained person is
probably guilty thereof.
SECTION 13.
Presence of Probable Cause. If the Inquest Officer
finds that probable cause exists, he shall forthwith prepare the corresponding
complaint/information with the recommendation that the same be filed in court.
The complaint/information shall indicate the offense committed and the amount of
bail recommended, if bailable.
Thereafter, the record of the case, together with the prepared
complaint/information, shall be forwarded to the City or Provincial Prosecutor for
appropriate action.
The complaint/information may be filed by the Inquest Officer himself or
by any other Assistant Prosecutor to whom the case may be assigned by the City
or Provincial Prosecutor.
SECTION 14.
others, contain:
Copyright 2010
a)
b)
the full name and aliases, if any, and address of the accused;
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
h)
SECTION 15.
Absence of Probable Cause. If the Inquest Officer
finds probable cause, he shall:
a)
b)
c)
d)
If the recommendation of the Inquest Officer for the release of the arrested
or detained person is approved, the order of release shall be served on the officer
having custody of the said detainee.
Should the City or Provincial Prosecutor disapprove the recommendation of
release, the arrested or detained person shall remain under custody, and the
corresponding complaint/information shall be filed by the City or Provincial
Prosecutor or by any Assistant Prosecutor to whom the case may be assigned.
SECTION 16.
Presence at the Crime Scene. Whenever a dead body
is found and there is reason to believe that the death resulted from foul play, or
from the unlawful acts or omissions of other persons and such fact has been
brought to his attention, the Inquest Officer shall:
a)
b)
c)
Copyright 2010
d)
e)
SECTION 17.
Sandiganbayan Cases. Should any complaint
cognizable by the Sandiganbayan be referred to an Inquest Officer for
investigation, the latter shall, after conducting the corresponding inquest
proceeding, forthwith forward the complete record to the City or Provincial
Prosecutor for appropriate action.
SECTION 18.
Recovered Articles. The Inquest Officer shall see to it
that all articles recovered by the police at the time of the arrest or apprehension of
the detained person are physically inventoried, checked and accounted for with the
issuance of corresponding receipts by the police officer/investigator concerned.
The said articles must be properly deposited with the police evidence
custodian and not with the police investigator.
caITAC
The Inquest Officer shall ensure that the items recovered are duly
safeguarded and the chain of custody is properly recorded.
SECTION 19.
Release of Recovered Articles. The Inquest Officer
shall, with the prior approval of the City or Provincial Prosecutor or his duly
authorized representative, order the release 9 of recovered articles to their lawful
owner or possessor, subject to the conditions that:
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
the said articles are not the instruments, or tools in the commission
of the offense charged nor the proceeds thereof; and
f)
Copyright 2010
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Copyright 2010
12 hours for light offenses; 18 hours for less grave offenses; and 36 hours for
grave offenses.
See NPS Form No. 1.
See NPS Form No. 2.
Go vs. Court of Appeals, 206 SCRA 138; Umil, et al. vs. Ramos, 202 SCRA 251
and companion cases: People vs. Malmstedt, 198 SCRA 401; and People vs.
Aminudin, 163 SCRA 402.
See NPS Form No. 2.
See NPS Form No. 3.
See NPS Form No. 4.
See NPS Form No. 2.
See NPS Form No. 5.
See NPS Form No. 6.
10
Copyright 2010
11
Copyright 2010
12
Copyright 2010
13
Copyright 2010
14
Endnotes
1 (Popup - Popup)
ACT 3815
PD 532
PD 533
PD 704
PD 705
PD 1602
PD 1612
PD 1866
RA 6425
RA 6539
Copyright 2010
15