Chapter 8 - Minicase
Chapter 8 - Minicase
Chapter 8 - Minicase
2/13/07
Professor Anu Vuorikoski
Bus 173A - Intermediate Financial Management
Chapter 8: mini case
a. Why are ratios useful? What are the five major categories of ratios?
Ratios are useful to evaluate a firms financial statements and one can also
compare their performance with other firms, or the industry average.
The five major categories for ratios are as follow:
i. Liquidity Ratios: measures the liquidity of the firms current
assets to their current liabilities (or obligations to creditors).
ii. Asset Management Ratios: measures how effectively the firm is
handling and managing their assets.
iii. Debt Management Ratios: measure their debt financing, or
financial leverage; how much is the firm depended on debt.
iv. Profitability Ratios: these ratios demonstrate the effects of
liquidity, asset management, and debt combined together on
operating results.
v. Market Value Ratios: these are ratios that help managers know
what investors think of the companys past performance and future
prospects.
b. Calculate the 2007 current and quick ratios based on the projected balance sheet
and income statement data. What can you say about the companys liquidity
position in 2005, 2006, and as projected for 2007? We often think of ratios as
being useful (1) to managers to help run the business, (2) to bankers for credit
analysis, and (3) to stockholders for stock valuation. Would these different types
of analysts have an equal interest in the liquidity ratios?
Current Ratio = Current Assets / Current Liabilities
Current Ratio = $2,680,112 / $1,039,800
Current Ratio = 2.58 times
Quick Asset Ratio = (Current Assets Inventory) / Current Liabilities
Quick Asset Ratio = ($2,680,112 - $1,716,480) / $1,039,800
Quick Asset Ratio = 0.93 times
The firm is has improved their in reducing their current liabilities and
increasing their current asset; however, they are still below industrial avg.
Current Ratio
Quick Acid Ratio
2005
2.3x
0.8x
2006
1.5x
0.5x
2007E
2.58x
0.93x
Industrial Avg.
2.7x
1.0x
PM = 3.6%
Profit Margin
2005
2.6%
2006 2007E
-1.6% 3.6%
Industrial Avg.
3.6%
The firm did horrible in 2006, but its now meeting the industrial average.
Basic Earning Power = EBIT / Total Assets
BEP = $502,640 / $3,516,952
BEP = 0.142 = 14%
Basic Earning
Power
2005 2006
14.2% 0.6%
2007E
14%
Industrial Avg.
17.8%
Basic Earning Power eliminates the effect of taxes and financial leverage.
The projected is below average compared to the industrial average.
Return on Total Assets = ROA = Net Income/ Total Assets
ROA = $253,548 / $3,516,952
ROA = 7.2%
ROA is lowered by debt--interest expense lowers net income, which also
lowers ROA.
ROA
2005
6.0%
2006 2007E
-3.3% 7.2%
Industrial Avg.
9%
2005 2006
13.3% -17.1%
2007E
12.8%
Industrial Avg.
17.9%
f. Calculate the 2007 price/earnings ratio, price/cash flow ratio, and market/book
ratio. Do these ratios indicate that investors are expected to have a high or low
opinion of the company?
Price/Earning Ratio = Price per share / Earning per Share
2005
9.7x
2006
-6.3x
2007E
12x
Industrial Avg.
16.2x
Price/Cash Flow Ratio = Price per Share / Cash Flow per Share
Cash Flow per Share = (Net Income + Depr.) / Shares Outstanding
Price/Cash Flow Ratio = $12.17/ (($253,548+$120,000)/250,000)
Price/Cash Flow Ratio = $12.17/ (($373,548)/250,000)
Price/Cash Flow Ratio = $12.17/ $1.494192
Price/Cash Flow Ratio = 8.15x
Price/Cash Flow Ratio
2005
8.0x
2006
27.5x
2007E
8.15x
Industrial Avg.
7.6x
Market/Book Ratio
1st Book Value per Share = Common Equity / Shares Outstanding
Book Value per Share = $1,977,152 / 250,000
Book Value per Share = $7.91
2nd Market/Book ratio = Market Price per Share / Book Value per Share
M/B ratio = $12.17 / $7.91
M/B ratio = 1.54 x
Market/Book ratio
2005
1.3x
2006
1.1x
2007E
1.54x
Industrial Avg.
2.9x
The price earning ratio is still below industrial average. The firm is considered
riskier. However, investors are willing to pay a more for the estimated 2007 year
than they did for the year of 2006. They do expect both revenue and earning to
grow.
g. Perform a common size analysis and percent change analysis. What do these
analyses tell you about Computron?
Common Size analysis for Income Statement
(86.7) than industry (84.5), but higher other expenses. Result is that net, net the
company has similar EBIT % (7.1) as industry.
To increase EBIT and bottom line to create shareholder wealth (by increasing
NOPAT), company needs to cut costs or grow costs slower than sales
j. What are some qualitative factors analysts should consider when evaluating a
company?
Are the companys revenues tied to a single customer?
To what extent are the companys revenues tied to a single product?
To what extent does the company rely on a single supplier?
What percentage of the companys business is generated overseas?
What is the competitive situation?
What does the future have in store?
What is the companys legal and regulatory environment? 2