Silika Silver
Silika Silver
Silika Silver
Abstract
D
I
Nanotechnology has become one of the most promising new approaches for pest control in
recent years. In our screening program, laboratory trials were conducted to determine the
effectiveness of silica nanoparticles (SNP) and silver nanoparticles (AgNP) on larval stage and
adults of Callosobruchus maculatus on cowpea seed. Nanoparticles of silica and silver were
synthesized through a solvothermal method and different concentrations (1, 1.5, 2 and 2.5 g kg-1) of
them were tested on C. maculatus. In the experiments, the LC50 value for SiO2 and Ag
nanoparticles were calculated 0.68 and 2.06 g kg-1 cowpeas on adults and 1.03 and 1.00 g kg-1 on
larvae, respectively. Result showed that, the both nanoparticles (silica and silver) were highly
effective on adults and larvae with 100% and 83% mortality, respectively. The result also showed
that SiO2 nanoparticles can be used as a valuable tool in pest management programs of C.
maculatus.
S
f
o
e
v
i
h
Introduction
The cowpea seed beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus F. (Col: Bruchidae), is the most important
storage pest of cowpea throughout the tropics. The control of stored grain pests stands mostly on
broad action insecticides and fumigants. Unfortunately, this leads to contamination of food with
toxic pesticide residues (Debnath et al., 2011). Moreover, the main problem in controlling pests in
stored grain is the resistance to pesticides. Regarding the resistance of grain pests and pesticide
residues, it seems that chemical control is not an appropriate approach for controlling the
population of these pests.
One alternative is the use of Diatomaceous Earths (DEs), composed mainly of amorphous silica
and derived from fossilized phyto-plankton (Subramanyam & Roesli, 2000; Mewis & Ul-richs,
2001). DE becomes more effective against insects if it possesses high silica content with uniform
size distribution (Korunik, 1997) and a number of physical properties of materials change as their
size approach nanoscale (Debnath et al., 2011).
Nanoparticles represent a new generation of environmental remediation technologies that could
provide cost-effective solution to some of the most challenging environmental clean-up problems
(Chinnamuthu & Murugesa Boopathi, 2009). Nanoparticles help to produce new pesticides,
insecticides and insect repellants (Owolade et al., 2008). Also, researchers believe that
nanotechnology will revolutionize agriculture including pest management in the near future
(Bhattacharyya et al., 2010). Although there have been numerous studies on the toxicity effects of
nanoparticles on bacteria, fungi, and animal pathogens (Bragg & Rannie, 1974; Feng et al., 2000;
Samuel & Guggenbichler, 2004; Elchiguerra et al., 2005; Reddy et al., 2007). Little research has
c
r
297
www.SID.ir
been carried out to investigate the toxicity effect of nanoparticles on insects specially storage pest.
Wan et al. (2005) studied the effect of action of mixture of two nanoparticles with two insecticides
to the pest mite (Epitrimerus pyri (Nalepa)). According to the authors cypermethrin and alpha
Terhienyl mixed with nano-particled zinc oxide and copper oxide was effective on the tested mite.
Yang et al. (2009) expressed that nanoparticles loaded with garlic essential oil is efficacious against
Tribolium castaneum (Herbst). Stadler et al. (2010) showed that nano alumina could be
successfully used to control stored grain pests.
These cues led us to investigate the entomotoxicity of silica and silver nanoparticles against
C. maculatus.
D
I
S
f
o
e
Bioassay
Adults of C. maculatus were reared at 301oC and 655% RH in the dark on cowpea seed.
Insects were obtained from cultures maintained in the Kerman Agricultural Organization laboratory
for at least three years, with no history of exposure to insecticides. Adults with less than 2 weeks
old and first instar larvae (Negahban & Moharramipour, 2007) were used for the experiments.
Effects of the nanosilica and nanosilver on adults and larvaes of C. maculatus were determined
by contact toxicity assay at three doses of 1, 1.5 and 2 g nanoparticle kg-1 cowpea seed. The
experiments were carried out in Completely Randomized Design with five replications each
consisted of 20 adults or larvae of C. maculatus in small plastic screw capped jars containing 20 g
of cowpea seed. Seeds in each jar were treated individually with nanoparticles. Then, the jars were
shaken manually for approximately 1 min to achieve equal distribution of nanoparticles on cowpea
seed (Subramanyam & Roesli, 2000). In one additional set no nanoparticle was mixed with cowpea
and this set served as control. After 24 h, 20 unmated adults of C. maculatus were introduced into
each jar. All bioassays were performed at 301oC and 655% RH. Insect mortality was checked
after 1, 2, 4, 7 and 14 days for adults and 48 hours for larvae stages.
v
i
h
c
r
Statistical Analysis
The mortality data was analyzed with SPSS 16 software followed by one-way analysis of
variance (ANOVA) and Duncan's multiple range tests. The results were expressed as means (SE)
of untransformed data and considered significantly different at P<0.05. Probit analysis was
conducted to estimate LC50 values with their fiducially limits by Probit analysis software.
* Model Philips XL 30
298
www.SID.ir
Results
Structural study of nanoparticles
The shape and size of the nanoparticles prepared in this study were checked by Scanning
Electron Microscope (SEM). Figure 1, indicates that the original morphology of the silica and
silver nanoparticles are approximately spherical with the diameter varying between 20 to 60 nm.
D
I
S
f
Fig. 1- The SEM images of synthesized Sio2 (left) and Ag (right) nanoparticles
o
e
v
i
h
c
r
299
www.SID.ir
Table 1- Percent mortality (mean SE) of C. maculatus adults treated with silica and silver nanoparticles
Concentration
(g kg-1)
1
1.5
2.5
0
Nanoparticles
SiO2
1
11.653.33d
2
28.34.40c
Ag
1.651.66e
3.31.66eg
SiO2
23.31.66c
Ag
Mortality (%)
Day
4
41.61.66c
7
61.66.00c
14
78.33.33c
8.31.66e
23.31.66g
33.33.33c
33.34.40c
58.34.40b
75.05.00b
91.64.40c
3.31.66e
6.651.66deg
13.33.33e
28.31.66g
43.31.66c
SiO2
33.33.33b
63.31.66b
802.88a
93.003.33a
100.00.00c
Ag
3.31.66e
8.31.66de
28.33.33d
41.61.66e
55.05.00c
SiO2
43.333.33a
71.61.66a
85.00.00a
Ag
5.00.00a
11.61.66d
40.62.88c
SiO2 - Ag
0.00.00e
0.00.00g
6.61.66e
D
I
96.01.66a
100.00.00c
51.61.66d
75.02.88c
10.010.00h
15.02.88c
S
f
* Means followed by same letter in column are not significantly different at 5% level
o
e
Table 2- Percentage mortality (mean SE) of C. maculatus larvae treated with silica and silver nanoparticles
Concentration
(g kg-1 of cowpea)
1
1.5
2
2.5
0
Mortality (%)
SNP
AgNP
37.002.00c
33.001.22c
52.002.54b
58.001.22b
a
61.001.87
71.002.44a
a
65.002.23
73.002.00a
2.001.22d
2.001.22d
v
i
h
* Means followed by same letter in column are not significantly different at 5% level
The LC50 value for SiO2 and Ag nanoparticles on larvae and adults of C. maculatus is shown in
Table 3 and 4. According to these values, adults of C. maculatus were more sensitive to SiO2 than
Ag nanoparticles. However, there was not any significant difference between LC50 of Ag and SiO2
nanoparticles. These results indicated that LC50 decreased with increasing in NP concentrations
(Table 1 and 3). However the mortality increased with increasing NP concentrations. Due to the
highest mortality in superlative concentration LC50 was compared after 14 days and 48 hours for
adults and larvae, respectively.
The LC50 values for SiO2 and Ag nanoparticles on adults and larvae after 14 days and 48 hours
were estimated 0.68, 1.03, 2.06 and 1.00 g kg-1 cowpea, respectively (Table 4). The LC50 value
comparison using the LC50 ratio (0.328) and their lower and upper 95% confidence limits (0.2110.511) showed that there was a significant difference between LC50 value for SiO2 (0.68 g kg-1) and
this value for Ag nanoparticles (2.06 g kg-1) on adults.
Comparision between SiO2 and Ag nanoparticles on larvae, the LC50 ratio (1.023) with their
lower and upper 95% confidence limits (0.0803-1.303) showed that there was no significant
difference between the LC50 value for SiO2 (1.03 g kg-1) and Ag nanoparticles (1.00 g kg-1). For the
all nanoparticles the statistic t ratio was >1.96, the g factor was <0.5 and the heterogeneity factor
was <1.
Because of no significant difference between the LC50 value for SiO2 and Ag nanoparticles on
larvae, silica nanoparticles could be more appropriate to control C. maculatus.
c
r
300
www.SID.ir
Table 3- LC50 (g kg-1 Seed weight) value of silica and silver nanoparticles against adults of C. maculatus
Nanoparticles
1
2.91
84.12
SNP
AgNP
Day
4
1.27
2.95
2
1.67
15.00
7
0.92
2.80
14
0.68
2.06
Table 4- LC50 (g kg-1 Seed weight) value of silica and silver nanoparticles against larvae after 48 hours and adults of
C. maculatus after 14 days
Nanoparticles
SNP
AgNP
Stage
LC50
Slop ( SE)
Limits 95%
Adults
Larvae
Adults
Larvae
0.68
1.03
2.06
1.00
3.91 0.97
2.82 0.54
2.70 0.74
4.90 0.67
0.30 - 0.89
0.94 1.11
1.80 2.50
0.76 1.17
Chi square
(2)
0.49
1.73
0.24
0.91
D
I
Doseresponse gradient was used to evaluate the relationship between pesticide and mortality.
The presence of a dose-response gradient is one of the key criteria for determining the effectiveness
of toxicity is causal (Robertson & Rappaport, 1979). According to Fig. 1 gradient of mortality in
higher doses was more than low doses in all treatments. The dosage-response gradient for SiO2 and
Ag on adults and larvae were estimated 3.91, 2.70, 2.93 and 4.90 based on calculated LC50,
respectively. These gradients also demonstrates that SiO2 (3.91) is more effective on adults than Ag
(4.90) is more effective on larvae than SiO2 (Fig. 1).
S
f
o
e
7500
7000
v
i
h
6500
Probit
6000
5500
c
r
5000
4500
4000
AgNP Larvae
AgNP Adult
SNP Larvae
SNP Adult
3500
0,0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
Log (Dose)
Fig. 1- Dose-response gradient of silica and silver nanoparticles against C. maculatus
301
www.SID.ir
Discussion
Management of stored-grain pests stands traditionally on use of synthetic insecticides and long
term application of these chemicals develops resistance to pesticides. In recent years, nanoparticles
have received much attention for controlling of pathogens in agriculture (Eleka et al., 2010; Guan
et al., 2008; Sang Woo et al., 2009). The use of nanomaterials in agriculture is still at a rudimentary
stage. Stadler et al. (2010) applied successfully nano alumina against two stored grain pests.
However, Yang & Watts (2005) showed that nano alumina in ground water inhibits the growth of
carrot, cabbage, cucumber, corn, and soybean. This study showed that NPs could be applied to
facilitate pest control management (IPM) of stored grain pests as C. maculatus. Comparison of our
results with earlier investigations (Debnath et al., 2011) demonstrates that application of SNP could
significantly increase mortality effect of NPs with increasing the time after application. They reveal
that SNP has a high potential as pesticide. This may be one of the possible reasons for which there
is an age-old tradition of using silica dust as protective agent for stored seeds by different ethnic
races all over the world (Ebeling, 1971). On the basis of our results, mortality effect of silica was
far more effective on adults than larvae, which this mortality could be attributed to the impairment
of the digestive tract (Smith, 1969) or to surface enlargement of the integument as a consequence of
dehydration or blockage of spiracles and tracheas. Also it refers to their enormously increased
exposed surfaces which could interact with the insect cuticle. Damage occurs to the insects
protective wax coat on the cuticle, both by sorption and abrasion.
It is well obvious from our results that nano silver is not effective on adults; this may be due to
cuticle but it shows effective entomotoxic potential against larval stage. This reaction could refer to
various toxicity mechanisms of Ag, which have been reported. Examples of such mechanisms
include generation of reactive oxygen Types, oxidative stress, membrane disruption, protein
unfolding, and/or inflammation (Bragg & Rannie, 1974; Feng et al., 2000; Samuel &
Guggenbichler, 2004; Elchiguerra et al., 2005; Reddy et al., 2007; Meng et al., 2009; Donaldson et
al., 2009).
Insect mortality effect of SiO2 nanoparticles was slightly more than that of Ag nanoparticles on
adults. These results also showed that Ag nanoparticles was more than that of SiO2 nanoparticles on
larvae but there was no significant difference between LC50 of Ag and SiO2 against larvae.
According to these findings, it is well obvious from our results that Sio2 could be selected as a good
agent to control this pest. This should be done whether the nanoparticles can act as a good method
of control and bring stored grain pests populations under control following EIL or not. Many
researchers have studied the effect of nanoparticles, especially that of against pathogens (Debnath
et al., 2011; Feng et al., 2000; Reddy et al., 2007). Our finding is consistent with other researchers
reports (Debnath et al., 2011; Stadler et al. 2010; Rouhani et al. 2011). According to Debnath et al.
(2011), the mortality of Sitophilus oryzae (Linnaeus) was significantly affected by hydrophilic and
hydrophobic of Sio2. Finding of Stadler et al. (2010) is also consistent with our results. They
demonstrated insecticidal effect of alumina nanoparticles on S. oryzae and Rhyzopertha dominica
(Fabricius). In addition, Rouhani et al. (2011) reported that ZnO-TiO2-Ag nanoparticles has
insecticidal activity on Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) and showed the most mortality effect
pertained to 28% ZnO-70% TiO2-2% Ag (LC50=195.27 mg/L).
For the practical use of SiO2 nanoparticles and test compounds as novel pesticide to proceed,
further research is required on the safety issues of these materials for human health. Other areas
requiring attention are its mode of action and development of formulations to improve potency and
stability, as well as to reduce cost.
D
I
S
f
o
e
v
i
h
c
r
Conclusion
Motivated by the fact that little is known regarding the effects of NPs on stored-grain pests. The
present study demonstrated strong toxicity of the tested NPs, nanosilica and nanosilver to
C. maculatus. Our findings suggest that the use of NPs cause a reduction in density of
C. maculatus, but among these, nanosilica have more toxic effects than nanosilver on adults and
nanosilver is more effective on larvae stage. The NPs can be removed by conventional milling
302
www.SID.ir
process unlike sprayable formulations of conventional pesticides, leaving residues on the stored
grain (Debnath et al., 2011). Therefore, SNP and AgNP have an excellent potential as stored grain
as well as seed protecting agent if applied with proper safety measures.
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Alireza Aslani in Vali-e-Asr University, Iran and Dr. Mehdi Kalantari at
Maryland University, College Park USA for helpful discussions. The authors are also thankful to
Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran for providing access to Scanning Electron Microscope
(SEM).
References
Aslani, A., Arefi, A. R., Babapoor, A., Amiria, A. and Beyki-Shuraki, Kh. 2011. Solvothermal
synthesis, characterization and optical properties of ZnO, ZnOMgO and ZnONiO, mixed
oxide nanoparticles. Applied Surface Science, 257: 48854889.
Bragg, P. D. and Rannie, D. J. 1974. The effect of silver ions on the respiratory chain of
Escherichia coli. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 20: 883-889.
Bhattacharyya, A., Bhaumik, A., Rani, P. U., Mandal, S. and Epidi, T. T. 2010. Nano-particles
- A recent approach to insect pest control. African Journal Biotechnology, 9(24): 3489-3493.
Chinnamuthu, C. R. and Murugesa Boopathi, P. 2009. Nanotechnology and Agroecosystem.
Madras Agricultural Journal, 96: 17-31.
Debnath, N., Das, S. and Seth, D. 2011. Entomotoxic effect of silica nanoparticles against
Sitophilus oryzae (L.). Journal of Pest Science, 84: 99105.
Donaldson, K., Borm, P. J. A., Castranova, V. and Gulumian, M. 2009. The limits of testing
particle-mediated oxidative stress in vitro in predicting diverse pathologies; relevance for testing
of nanoparticles. Particle and Fibre Toxicology, 6: 1-13.
Ebeling, W. 1971. Sorptive dusts for pest control. Annual Review of Entomology, 16: 123158.
Elchiguerra, J. L., Burt, J. L., Morones, J. R., Camacho-Bragado, A., Gao, X., Lara, H. H.
and Yacaman, M. J. 2005. Interaction of silver nanoparticles with HIV-1. Journal of
Nanobiotechnology, 3: 6.
Eleka, N., Hoffmanb, R., Ravivb, U., Reshb, R., Ishaayac, I. and Magdassi, S. 2010. Novaluron
nanoparticles: Formation and potential use in controlling agricultural insect pests. Colloids and
Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 372: 6672.
Feng, Q. L., Wu, J., Chen, G. O., Cui, F. Z., Kim, T. N. and Kim, J. O. 2000. A mechanistic
study of the antibacterial effect of silver ions on Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus.
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 52: 662-668.
Guan, H., Chi, D., Yu, J. and Li, X. 2008. A novel photodegradable insecticide: Preparation,
characterization and properties evaluation of nano-Imidacloprid. Pesticide Biochemistry and
Physiology, 92: 8391.
Mathew, L. and Narayanankutty, S. K. 2010. Synthesis and characterization of nanosilica.
International Conference on Advances in Polymer Technology, India, February 2010, pp: 279280.
Meng, H., Xia, T., George, S. and Nel, A. E. 2009. A predictive toxicological paradigm for the
safety assessment of nanomaterials. ACS Nano 3: 1620-1627.
Mewis, I. and Ulrichs, C. 2001. Action of amorphous diatomaceous earth against different stages
of the stored product pests Tribolium confusum, Tenebrio molitor, Sitophilus granarius and
Plodia interpunctella. Journal of Stored Product Research, 37: 153164.
Negahban, M. and Moharramipour, S. 2007. Efficiency of Artemisia sieberi Besser and
Artemisia scoparia waldst et kit essential oils on biological activity of Callosobruchus
maculatus F. (Col.: Bruchidae). Iranian Journal of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, 23 (2): 146156.
D
I
S
f
o
e
v
i
h
c
r
303
www.SID.ir
Owolade, O. F., Ogunleti, D. O. and Adenekan, M. O. 2008. Titanium Dioxide affects disease
development and yield of edible cowpea. Electronic Journal of Environmental, Agricultural and
Food Chemistry, 7(50): 2942-2947.
Reddy, K. M., Feris, K., Bell, J., Wingett, D. G., Hanley, C. and Punnoose, A. 2007. Selective
toxicity of zinc oxide nanoparticles to prokaryotic and eukaryotic system. Applied Physics
Letters, 90: 213-902.
Robertson, J. L. and Rappaport, N. G. 1979. Direct, indirect and residual toxicities of insecticide
sprays to western spruce budworm, Choristoneura occidentalis (Lepidoptera:Tortricidae).
Canadian Entomologist, 111: 1219.
Rouhani, M., Samih, M. A., Aslani, A. and Beiki, Kh. 2011. Side effect of nano-Zno-Tio2-Ag
mix-oxide nanoparticles on Frankliniella occidentalis Pergande (Thys.: Thripidae). In
Proceedings, The International Symposium on Insect Physiology, Biochemistry and Molecular
Biology, Shanghai, China, July 2011, p. 51.
Samuel, U., and Guggenbichler, J. P. 2004. Prevention of catheter-related infections: The
potential of a new nano-silver impregnated catheter. International Journal of Antimicrobial
Agents, 23S1: S75-S78.
Sang Woo, K., Kim, K. S., Lamsal, K., Kim, Y. J., Kim, S. B., Jung, M., Sim, S. J., Kim, H. S.,
Chang, S. J., Kim, J. K. and Lee, Y. S. 2009. An in vitro study of the antifungal effect of
silver nanoparticles on Oak wilt pathogen Raffaelea sp. Journal of Microbiology and
Biotechnology, 19: 760764.
Smith, B. C. 1969. Effects of silica on the survival of Coleomegilla maculata lengi (Coleoptera:
Coccinellidae) and Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Canadian
Entomologist, 101: 460462.
Subramanyam, B. H. and Roesli, R. 2000. Inert dusts. In: Subramanyam Bh Hagstrum DW (eds)
Alternatives to pesticides in stored-product IPM. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordreecht, pp:
321380
Stadler, T., Butelerb, M. and Weaver, D. K. 2010. Novel use of nanostructured alumina as an
insecticide. Pest Management Science, 66: 577579.
Yang, L. and Watts, D. J. 2005. Particle surface characteristics may play an important role in
phytotoxicity of alumina nanoparticles. Toxicology Letters, 158(2): 122132
Yang, F. L., Li, X. G., Zhu, F. and Lei, C. L. 2009. Structural characterization of nanoparticles
loaded with garlic essential oil and their insecticidal activity against Tribolium castaneum
(Herbst) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 57(21):
10156-10162.
Wan, S. Q. and Zhong-Nian, G. 2005. Effect of action of mixture of two nano particles with two
insecticides to pest mite (Epitrimerus pyri). Chinese Journal of Pesticides 44(12): 570-572.
D
I
S
f
o
e
v
i
h
c
r
A
304
www.SID.ir
) -(
2008-4668
www.entomologicalresearch.ir
4 4 (305-297) 1391
)Callosobruchus maculatus F. (Col: Bruchidae
3
*1 2
-1
D
I
-2
-3
S
f
.
Callosobruchus maculatus .
2 1/5 1 0 2/5
o
e
v
i
h
.
:
Callosobruchus maculates
c
r
* :
Rouhani_valiasr @ yahoo.com
) - (91/3/11 )(91/9/28
305
305
www.SID.ir