Finance
Finance
Finance
The present report attempts to give an overview of the Ratio Analysis with special reference to
Durgapur Steel Plant (DSP), a unit of SAIL. Financial Management has emerged as interesting
and exciting area for academic studies as well as for the practical financial managers. Financial
management covers the decisions taken by an individual for a business firm, which has financial
implications. So, the decisions process is oriented towards the objective of maximizing the
wealth of shareholders as reflected in market price of share.
As an integrated unit of SAIL, Durgapur Steel Plant is a public sector firm, whose 85% share is
with Government of India.
The study seeks to describe the importance of ratio analysis in manufacturing firms. An effort
has also been made to understand different financial implications and to make a detailed study of
various elements of ratio analysis in DSP. Here, the Ratios for Durgapur Steel Plant has been
compared with the other steel plants of Bokaro, Bhilai and Rourkela for three years, i.e. 2012,
2013, 2014.
Financial Management covers the decisions taken by an individual for a business firm, which
results in financial implication and hence improving the liquidity and also increases the ability to
invest in productive assets such as plant & machinery, so as to affect the profitability.
COMPANY PROFILE
The precursor
SAIL traces its origins to the formative years of an emerging nation-India. After independence
the builders of modern India worked with a vision to lay the infrastructure for rapid
industrialization of the country. The steel sector was to propel the economic growth. Hindustan
Steel Limited was set up in January, 1954.
Expanding horizon (1959-1973)
Hindustan Steel (HSL) was initially designed to manage only one plant that was coming up at
Rourkela. For Bhilai and Durgapur Steel Plants, The preliminary work was done by Iron and
Steel Industry.
On the basis the concept of creating a holding company to manage inputs and outputs under one
umbrella. This led to the formulation of Steel Authority of India Ltd (SAIL), incorporated in
1973 with an authorized capital of 2000crore. This was responsible for managing integrated steel
plants at Bhilai, Bokaro, Durgapur, Rourkela.
Since its inception, SAIL has been instrumental in laying a sound infrastructure for the industrial
development of technical and managerial expertise.
Target Vision
TO BE A RESPECTED WORLD CLASS CORPORATION AND THE LEADERS IN
INDIAN STEEL BUSINESS IN QUALITY, PRODUCTIVITY, PROFITABILITY, AND
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION.
DEPARTMENT
PRODUCT
Skelp Mills
Merchant Mills
Billets
Blast Furnace
Pig Iron
Section Mills
To study the importance of Ratio Analysis and understand its various objectives.
To understand in general the management process of public sector companies.
To know how these are applied in practical life.
To understand financial management decisions taken by an individual or a business firm,
which have financial implications with respect to Durgapur Steel Plant (DSP).
This study is focussed on the ratio analysis in the Durgapur Steel Plant. It also gives me a
comparative ratio analysis with the other steel plant. To conduct this study, I joined DSP as Intern
Trainee under the supervision of Mr V.K.BAJPAI, Assistant General Manager (Finance &
Accounts). In this study I have use both primary and secondary data.
For the study, I have collected primary data as well as secondary data. Primary data was
collected by interviewing one or two executives from each section of the finance department,
with special assistance of Mr V.K.Bajpai. Whenever any executive got time, I was referred to
him for my interview.
Sections visited: -1) Raw Material section
3) Cash Section
4) Excise Section
1. Percentage method
The relationship between two figures is expressed in percentage. For example, if sales is
Rs. 1,00,000 and gross profit is Rs. 25,000, the relationship can be presented as gross
profit to be 25% of sales.
3. Ratio Method
The relationship between two figures is presented in a ratio. From the above example, the
ratio of gross profit to sales will be 25000:100000 or 1:4.
Activity or turnover ratio measure how quickly a firm converts on-cash assets to cash assets.
Example of such ratios includes stock or inventory turnover ratio, debtors turnover ratio,
working capital turnover ratio, current assets turnover ratio and so forth.
ANALYSIS OF RATIO
In context to SAIL, we shall now discuss the theory and analyze certain ratios with the help of
the collected data. Here, the ratio for Durgapur Steel Plant has been compared with the other
steel plants of Bokaro, Bhilai and Rourkela, for three year, i.e., 2011-2012, 2012-2013, 20132014.
CURRENT RATIO
Current ratio indicates the short term financial soundness of the company. It judges whether
current assets are sufficient to meet current liabilities or not. Current assets include those assets
which can be converted into cash within a year, such as cash in hand, cash at bank, Debtors or
Book Debts and stock or Inventory. Similarly current liabilities are those liabilities which are to
be paid within a year, such as creditors, short term loans and Bills or Notes Payable.
Traditionally the conventional ratio is taken to be 2:1(for every current liability of Re.1, there
should be current assets of Rs.2).
Significance: - According to the ideal current ratio 2:1, current assets of a business should, at
least, be twice of its current liabilities. Higher the ratio better is the liquidity position of the firm.
However if in case it is too high, it will indicate idleness of funds while if it is too low, there will
be short term financial scarcity.
10
CURRENT ASSETS
in Crores)
CURRENT RATIO
1194.89
CURRENT
LIABILITIES
983.98
BOKARO STEEL
PLANT(BSL)
5480.96
2075.04
2.64
ROURKELA STEEL
PLANT(RSP)
2547.76
1458.70
1.75
BHILAI STEEL
PLANT(BSP)
3347.24
4000.64
0.84
1.21
Analysis: - The standard current ratio has been set up to be the maximum out of the industry
current ratio. The current ratio of Bokaro Steel Plant (BSL) is higher than the other industry
standard; due to high inventory BSL current ratio is high. The short term solvency position is
better at the present perspective but this might be temporary due to accumulation of inventory.
Graphical Representation 2 :-
QUICK
RATIO
Quick ratio,
also known
as acid test
ratio
or
liquidity
ratio shows
liquidity of
the business
in
real
sense.
It
establishes a relationship between quick/liquid assets and current liabilities. Cash is the most
liquid asset, other assets which are considered to be relatively liquid and included in quick assets
11
are debtors and bills receivable and marketable securities. Inventories are considered to be
relatively liquid and included in quick assets are debtors and bills receivable and marketable
securities. Inventories are considered to be less liquid.
Generally a quick ratio of 1:1 is said to represent a satisfactory current financial condition.
Significance: - liquidity ratio shows very short term liquidity or capacity of the business to meet
its obligations at short notice (ordinarily within a month). The ideal norm of 1:1 implies that
liquid assets should be equal to current liabilities. Higher the ratio, better will be the capacity of
the business to meet its current obligations.
YEAR(31ST
MARCH)
LIQUID ASSETS
LIQUID LIBILITIES
in Crores)
QUICK RATIO
12
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
1050.75
1285.13
1193.48
582.21
846.06
1162.37
1.80
1.52
1.03
Analysis: - there are some elements of current assets as well as current liabilities that are less
liquid such as bank overdraft, stock, prepaid expenses etc. The quick ratio of DSP in 2013-2014
is 1.02:1.which indicates that the short term solvency position is very much comfortable for trade
payable and company having enough cash to pay its creditors.
(Rs
YEAR(31MARCH,2014)
DSP
LIQUID ASSETS
1193.48
LIQUID LIBILITIES
983.98
in Crores)
QUICK RATIO
1.21
13
BSL
RSP
BSP
5478.10
2526.04
3344.39
2075.04
1458.70
4000.64
2.64
1.73
0.84
Analysis: - The standard quick ratio has been set up to be the maximum out of the industry quick
ratio. The quick ratio of BSL is higher than the industry standard (BSL= 2.64:1), which indicates
that its short term solvency position is better than the other plants.
Here,
For gross profit ratio, generally a range of 25% to 30% is taken as acceptable norm. However in
this case, the industry standards are followed.
Significance: - this ratio reveals profit earning capacity of the business with reference to its sale.
Increase in gross profit ratio will mean reduction in cost of production or direct expenses or sale
at reasonably good price, and decrease in the ratio will mean increased cost of production or
sales at lesser price. There is no ideal standard measure for this ratio but it should be sufficient to
cover selling expenses of the firm.
(Rs
in Crores)
YEAR(31MARCH,2014)
GROSS PROFIT
SALES
2011-2012
844.14
6975.81
12.10
15
2012-2013
902.99
7649.82
11.80
2013-2014
778.91
7492.85
10.40
Analysis: - The gross profit ratio is used to explain the relation between sales and gross earnings.
According to above data, the gross profit ratio of DSP in 2012 was 12.10 % and afterwards it is
continuously in decreasing trend. Gross Profit Ratio falls to 10.40 % in 2014 due to huge amount
of direct expenses incurred. So, DSP have to reduce its expenditure in direct expenses and
increase its sale.
Graphical Representation 5: -
(Rs
YEAR(31MARCH,2014)
GROSS PROFIT
SALES
in Crores)
DSP
778.91
7492.85
10.40
BSL
715.60
13594.42
5.26
RSP
792.60
9126.69
8.68
BSP
2651.92
17585.41
15.08
Analysis: - The Gross Profit Ratio of DSP is lower than BSP due to the decrease in the net
sales in 2014, which indicates that the profitability position of DSP is not good. But in
comparison to other two industries i.e. BSL and RSP, Gross Profit Ratio is better. So, DSP should
increase its income and reduce its expenditure as much as possible to improve the Gross Profit
Ratio.
Graphical Representation 6 :-
17
NET RATIO =
NET PROFIT
X 100
NET SALES
Here,
For net profit ratio, an ideal norm is absent. The industry standards are followed.
Significance: - An increase in the ratio over that of the previous year shows improvement in the
overall efficiency and profitability of the business. Decrease in the ratio indicates managerial
inefficiency and selling and distribution expenses.
YEAR(31MARCH,2014)
NET PROFIT
SALES
in Crores)
18
2011-2012
503.46
6975.81
7.22
2012-2013
552.66
7649.82
7.22
2013-2014
415.60
7492.85
5.55
Analysis:- Net Profit Ratio or Net margin Ratio measures the overall profitability and the
efficiency of the management. According to the above table, the net profit ratio of DSP in 2012
was 7.20 % and in 2013 it decreased to 7.18 %. In 2014, it decreased to 5.54% which shows a
negative trend. It indicates that in 2014 it has excessive indirect expenses. For that reason, it
needs to decrease its expense in the near future.
in Crores )
YEAR(31MARCH,2014)
NET PROFIT
SALES
DSP
415.60
7492.85
5.55
19
BSL
202.01
13594.42
1.49
RSP
212.20
9126.69
2.33
BSP
2084.84
17585.41
11.86
Analysis: - The net profit ratio of DSP is 5.55 % which is less than BSP. It indicates that the
firm is unable to maintain its expenses in a proper way. In respect of that standard the
profitability of DSP becomes much poorer. But the net profit ratio of other two integrated
plants i.e. BSL and RSP is less than DSP. So, DSP have to improve its excessive indirect
expense in order to match with BSP.
This ratio establishes a relationship between costs of goods sold and average stock, and reflects
the speed of turning over the stock into sales. It is also knows as inventory turnover ratio.
20
TURNOVER
AVERAGE STOCK
For stock turnover ratio, the ratio followed in the industry may be taken as the ideal norm.
SIGNIFICANCE: - This ratio shows the effectiveness of the stock policy of the management.
Higher stock or inventory turnover ratio is immediately sold and is not blocked. Every business
has to keep optimum amount of stock, so that production work maybe carried on smoothly. If the
average inventory kept during the year is more than ordinary requirement, the amount spent in its
purchase will be unnecessarily blocked and there will also be the problem of storing it. In case
the average stock is lesser than the ordinary requirement, the production work will suffer. So it is
advisable to maintain an optimum quantity of stock.
TURNOVER
AVERAGE STOCK
in Crores)
21
2011-2012
6395.85
1251.14
5.11
2012-2013
6903.61
559.72
12.33
2013-2014
6758.79
569.28
11.87
Analysis: - If the stock turnover ratio is too high it is an indication of holding a very low level
of inventory. Holding very low level of inventory is the risk of frequent shortage of stock, which
may adversely affect the production process. It is always desirable for a firm to maintain a
balance level of inventory. From the above data, we can see that in the year 2012 this ratio of
DSP is 5.11 times and in the year 2013 it increased to 12.33 times. But after that in the year 2014
it was decreased at 11.87 times. It indicates a projectile state of inventory level, and it should be
managed properly.
TURNOVER
AVERAGE STOCK
in Crores )
22
DSP
6758.79
569.28
11.87
BSL
12298.21
3718.80
3.31
RSP
8198.53
1327.14
6.18
BSP
15777.81
1701.54
9.27
Analysis: - From the above table we can see that the stock turnover ratio of DSP is much better
than other three integrated steel plants i.e. BSL, RSP, and BSP. The Stock turnover ratio of DSP
is 11.87 times which is taken as the standard form. It is the sign of efficient inventory
management. It indicates the low inventory level and quick conversion of inventory into sales.
23
This ratio indicates the economy and efficiency with the various expenses are incurred to attain
the goal of maximizing profit and minimizing cost.
Total Expense
Net Sales
Significance: - Total Expense Ratio when compared with the same ratio of the previous year
gives a very important indication whether these expenses in relation to sales are increasing,
decreasing, or remaining satisfactory. If the total expense ratio is lower, the profitability will be
greater and if the total expense ratio is higher, the profitability will be lower.
24
(Rs in Crores)
YEAR
TOTAL EXPENSE
NET SALES
TOTAL EXPENSE
RATIO
2011-12
5994.87
6991.15
85.74 %
2012-13
6692.9
7694.7
86.98 %
2013-14
6589.53
7492.85
87.94 %
( 31stMARCH,2014)
Analysis: - Form the above table, we can analyses that the Total Expense Ratio of DSP shows
the increasing trend from 2012 to 2014. It increases from 85.74 % to 87.94 %. Clearly, Total
Expense Ratio is not in favour of Durgapur Steel Plant. So, DSP should try to reduce its total
expense further and increase net sales to increase its profit.
YEAR
(31stmarch 2014)
TOTAL
NET SALES
EXPENSE
TOTAL EXPENSE
RATIO
DSP
6589.53
7492.85
87.94 %
BSL
11896.88
13594.42
87.51 %
RSP
8307.8
9126.69
91.02 %
BSP
14497.49
17585.41
82.44 %
Analysis:- Total Expense Ratio of DSP is more than BSL and BSP. It shows that DSPs control
over expenses and cost is poor in comparison to BSL and BSP. The higher the ratio, the bad the
position of the management. So, DSP should reduce its expenses and cost for better result. They
should also try to increase their sales by targeting their customers.
Graphical Representation 12 :-
This ratio reveals how efficiently the fixed asset is being utilized.
Net Sales
Net Fixed Asset
Significance: - A high fixed assets turnover ratio indicates efficient utilization of fixed assets
in generating sales. A firm whose plant and machinery are old may show a higher fixed assets
turnover ratio than the firm which has purchase them recently.
YEAR
Net Sales
Net Fixed
Asset
Fixed Asset
Turnover Ratio
2011-12
6991.15
1379.77
5.06 Times
2012-13
7694.7
1195.97
6.43 Times
2013-14
7492.85
1242.35
6.03 Times
( 31st March )
Analysis:- From the above table, we can analyses that Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio of DSP has
a parabolic trend . In 2013 there was a improvement in the ratio to 6.43, but in 2014 it decreases
to 6.03 times. This means that the efficiency in work performance of DSP has a positive slope
and it needs improvement.
Graphical Representation 13 :-
Net Sales
Net Fixed
Asset
Fixed Asset
Turnover
28
2014)
Ratio
DSP
7492.85
1242.35
6.03 times
BSL
13594.42
3006.76
4.52 times
RSP
9126.69
6840.46
1.33 times
BSP
17585.41
3770.24
4.66 times
Analysis:- Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio of DSP is more than other three integrated steel plants
i.e. BSL, RSP, and BSP. The Fixed Asset turnover ratio of DSP is as per the industry standards.
So, DSP needs to maintain its Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio by effectively utilizing its Fixed
Assets.
Graphical Representation 14 :-
29
The ratio is also termed as Debt Service Ratio. This ratio is calculated by dividing the profit
before charging interest and income-tax by fixed interest charges.
Significance: - This ratio indicates how many times the interest charges are covered by the
profit available to pay interest charges. A long-term lender is interested in finding out whether
the business will earn sufficient profits to pay the interest charges regularly.
An interest coverage ratio of 6 to 7 times is considered appropriate. It also indicates the extent to
which profit can decline without in any way affecting the firms ability to meet its fixed interest
obligations.
in Crores )
30
PBIT
Interest Charges
Interest
Coverage Ratio
2011-12
550.57
47.11
11.68 Times
2012-13
634.27
81.61
7.77 Times
2013-14
519.55
103.95
4.99 Times
Analysis : - From the above table, we see that the Interest Coverage Ratio of DSP in 2012 is
11.68 times which is much greater than 2013 and 2014. Then it is constantly decreasing at a
faster rate. In 2014 the Interest Coverage Ratio is 4.99 times, which is not good for the creditors
of DSP at all. It indicates that lenders have low safety of return on investment.
Graphical Representation 15 :-
TABLE 16:
INDUSTRY
WISE
PERFORMANCE OF SAIL
(Rs in Crores )
YEAR
PBIT
Interest
charges
INTEREST
COVERAGE RATIO
519.55
103.95
4.99 Times
31
BSL
400.50
198.49
2.01 Times
RSP
422.29
210.09
2.01 Times
BSP
2320.31
235.47
9.85 Times
Analysis :- From the above table, we analyses that Interest Coverage Ratio of BSP is 9.85
times which is more than other three integrated steel plants of SAIL. DSPs interest coverage
ratio is higher than BSL and RSP which is good from industry point of view, but less than the
standard Interest Coverage Ratio. So, DSPs capacity of Debt servicing is very poor.
Graphical Representation 16 :-
RETURN ON INVESTMENT
This is one of the most important ratios for the measure of overall profitability of the business. It
indicates the relationship of net profit with capital employed in the business. This ratio is usually
in percentage and is also known as return on capital employed or yield on capital.
32
PBIT
550.57
634.27
519.55
capital employed
3108.47
3789.40
3805.11
ROI
17.71
16.74
13.65
33
Analysis: - This ratio is a real test of the probability from the view point of investors. From the
above table we can see that in 2011-2012 the return on investment of DSP is 17.71% which is
good. After that it is continuously decreased in the year 2012-2013 it is16.73%. & in 2013-2014
it is 13.65%. We know that higher return on investment is always favourable to the shareholder.
Therefore DSP need to work for increasing its rate of return.
Graphical Representation 17 :-
PBIT
519.55
400.50
422.29
capital employed
3805.11
11308.83
14928.78
in Crores )
ROI
13.65
3.54
2.83
34
2320.31
BSP
16470.15
14.09
Analysis: - Return on investment of DSP is more than other firm i.e. 14.09% in comparative to other
firm which is good. There is a better probability that the investor invest their investment in DSP in order
to avail more benefits, but DSP keep on focus to improve its rate of investment.
Graphical Representation 18 :-
Activity chart
Week
Activity Done
Week1
35
Week2
Week3
Week4
Week5
Week6
Week7
Week8
KEY LEARNING
Through this 8 week of internship, I came to know how the industry actually works,
especially company in project industry.
36
In the period of 8 weeks, I learned how to behave in the organization means the
organizational behaviour and the organization culture.
While doing this project, the most important thing which I came to know that how the
company analysis its financial statement with the help of ratio analysis.
This project gives me the knowledge that the company works according to the customers
demand.
I learned how to analyze and do the interpretation from the given data i.e. annual report
of the company.
It was a great opportunity to do a project at at Durgapur Steel Plant a unit of SAIL, where
I got the chance to apply my theoretical knowledge to practical.
CONCLUSIONS
There is a proverb called Old Wine in a New Bottle. If the company is able to get that
correctly it will definitely succeed in the future. Why Old wine and why in a new bottle.
If the company wants to win in the race it must innovate some out of the box ideas to
implement in the journey. New Bottle here is used in that sense only that if the company
can implement the idea properly it can win in the race of competition.
37
Ratio Analysis represents the strength and the financial soundness of a firm so that its
efficiency and profitability improves and it carries out its operation successfully.
Through the study of one particular firm, I can conclude the importance of ratio analysis
in other manufacturing firm as well. Also, taken into account are the operations carried in
Durgapur Steel Plant and the working of the finance section, both of which have been
analysed to the best possible extent.
BIBLIOGHAPHY
http://sail.co.in/aboutus-php?tag=company-background
ANNEXURE
DURGAPUR STEEL PLANT
BALANCE SHEET
AS AT 31ST MARCH 2015
PARTICULARS
31ST March
2014
31ST March
2013
31ST March
2012
Shareholders Fund:
a) Share Capital
0.00
0.00
0.00
1716.63
1301.03
748.37
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
42.88
37.83
21.53
449.26
519.43
439.06
10.33
9.76
4.92
b) Trade Payables
236.40
218.93
167.48
807.71
665.49
493.08
d) Short-Term Provisions
165.28
210.17
145.88
8780.92
8906.60
8499.14
Total
12209.41
11869.24
10519.46
Particulars
31st March
2014
31st March
2013
31st March
2012
ASSETS:
NON CURRENT ASSETS
a) Fixed Assets
1. Tangible Assets
2. Intangible Assets
3. Capital Work In Progress
1499.46
1458.65
1665.27
2.25
6.05
9.86
2050.36
1753.70
902.08
40
b) Non-Current Investments
0.01
0.01
0.01
42.12
39.70
47.33
0.00
0.00
0.00
953.13
1103.24
898.13
1.41
39.88
36.84
17.19
0.42
21.37
42.41
29.78
33.92
180.75
151.69
97.33
7420.32
7286.13
6807.32
12209.41
11869.24
10519.46
31st March
2013
31st March
2012
7554.28
7712.62
7031.60
795.49
809.01
635.75
39.41
18.16
22.92
621.18
473.39
480.13
7419.38
7395.16
6898.90
41
Expenses
Cost of materials consumed
3481.03
3806.39
3515.94
0.00
0.00
0.00
132.35
-157.88
-0.93
1037.32
995.35
883.94
Finance Cost
103.95
81.61
47.11
259.36
268.72
293.57
Corporate Office
62.40
71.68
72.82
CMO
62.82
67.66
50.20
CCSO
4.16
3.74
3.81
Other expenses
1837.85
1666.47
1421.05
Total Expenses
6981.24
6803.74
6287.51
438.14
591.42
611.39
-0.12
0.00
-3.03
438.02
591.42
608.36
22.42
38.76
104.90
0.00
0.00
0.00
415.60
552.66
503.46
42