Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 5 April 2012
Received in revised form
1 January 2013
Accepted 3 January 2013
Available online 20 January 2013
The aim of the article is to present a case study related to implementation of cleaner production (CP)
process with the concept of minimizing emissions versus the end of pipe (EOP) approach within pharmaceutical industry. The idea is to move beyond simple pollution control by technology improvement
and prevention of organic solvents emission into the atmosphere. Furthermore, cost-effectiveness of the
suggested approach is evaluated compared to traditional concepts of polluted air treatment, ensuring
both environmentally friendly and effective production of lm coated tablets. Technological changes to
improve the impact on the environment have been applied already in many industries as well as in
pharmaceutical manufacturing. However, more effort is to be made in order to further decrease particularly VOCs emission into the atmosphere. An analysis is provided to stimulate a proactive approach in
this eld towards completely eliminating the use of organic solvents from lm-coating systems in the
production of the pharmaceutical solid dosage forms. The new way of addressing the costs actually
associated with embracing cleaner technologies, which are mostly related to regulatory aspects in
pharmaceutical industry, is aimed to promote the change in culture, as well as to be applied in the
decision making process for other pharmaceutical facilities still using organic solvents based coatings in
the manufacturing of tablets. The signicance of the small scale projects is additionally emphasized
considering the magnitude of the world generic market.
2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Tablet coating
Pharmaceutical industry
BAT
VOCs emission
1. Introduction
The modern pharmaceutical industry is a highly competitive
industry whose origins can be traced back to the late 19th century
when most of todays major pharmaceutical companies started out
as chemical industries. These companies gradually evolved into
global players within the pharmaceutical sector witnessing major
developments in the 1970s with the introduction of tighter regulatory controls, especially regulations governing the manufacture of
generics. The global pharmaceutical market sale is expected to
grow at a 4e7% compound annual growth rate (CAGR) through
2013, which is, among other factors, driven by the changing combination of innovative and mature products (Pharmaceutical
Market Trends, 2010).
124
integrated assessment for implementing CP technologies in pharmaceutical industry (Zhi-Dong et al., 2011a, 2011b). Furthermore,
when it comes to this region where generic pharmaceuticals have
signicant impact on the total industrial value of the whole country, and although some cases of execution of CP exist showing that
the return of investment in CP is quick, frequently only limited
interest is expressed in terms of involvement in building a serious
strategy within the pharmaceutical sector and on the regional level
(Ze-hua et al., 2011; Zhi-Dong et al., 2011a).
All new drugs, both innovator and generic, must be approved by
relevant regulatory authorities before marketing. In terms of CP aspects, the product Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is usually considered
in this process as well. Although LCA as an environmental management tool has been used in some industrial sectors since 1970s and
experienced signicant methodological development in 1990s,
especially for applications in process selection, design and optimization (Azapagic, 1999), as well as recently in production logistics
(Burchart-Korol, 2011a), very few LCA studies can be found in the
literature today concerning pharmaceutical products or processes
(Mata et al., 2012). Despite the fact that LCA has become one of the
most relevant methodologies to help organizations accomplish their
environmental and sustainability goals, such as Life Cycle Sustainable Assessment (LCSA) as one of the most comprehensive methods
to assess processes, products or technologies at every stage
(Burchart-Korol, 2011b), difculties exist in pharmaceutical industry
related to different factors like measuring inputs and outputs
(pharmaceuticals being among the most complex chemicals produced), specialized processes involved in the production itself usually organized in discreet batches varying in size, and multipurpose
plants, sharing equipment and facilities between production lines.
Nevertheless, since the life cycles of pharmaceuticals have recently
become a concern for many environmental scientists, some LCA was
performed in pharmaceutical industry, although mostly related to
Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (API) Production. Case studies
from Pzer, Bristol-Myers Squibb and Novartis were examined
where solvent recovery and reduction techniques were integrated
into API synthesis as a pollution prevention solution (Raymond et al.,
2010), as well as Hoffmann-La Roche (Wernet et al., 2010), and Life
Cycle Inventory (LCI) performed for vancomycine hydrochloride
(Ponder and Overcash, 2010), but excluding further use of the API in
a galenic formulation (preparation of the tablet/solution), i.e. production steps of a pharmaceutical, in all cases. The production of
sertraline hydrochloride and paroxetine was also investigated previously by the same research group working on vancomycine hydrochloride, showing that solvent and energy usage have the
greatest impact on LCA. However, no detailed information is available as a full LCI of a nished pharmaceutical product, actually using
these APIs as raw materials for further processing.
On the other hand, numerous action plans and processes were
developed in order to reduce or eliminate the use or generation of
substances hazardous for the environment in different sectors such
as healthcare (Zimmer and McKinley, 2008; Allen, 2006) and industry according to the Green Chemistry concept (Manley et al.,
2008), and CP technologies implemented by the companies of
major environmental concern to reduce ecological damage
(Jovanovic et al., 2010). There is also a variety of articles dealing
with problems of stimulating technological changes to enhance
environmental preservation (Fukasaku, 2000) and reduce pollutant
emissions at the source, as well as with the role of regulations as
clean technology promoters, especially for VOCs emissions reduction (Belis-Bergouignan et al., 2004). The discussions were raised in
an attempt to answer the question why companies still do not fully
comply with the requirement to adopt clean technologies favored
by the European VOC directive and to explain the gap between
regulatory developments and actual industrial choices, i.e. to
understand the reasons why there is still preference for EOP technologies despite the regulatory factors encouraging CP.
When it comes to production processes in pharmaceutical industry, since being one of the largest users of organic solvents per
amount of the nal product (Slater et al., 2006), end of pipe (EOP)
technologies or reduced consumption of toxic and hazardous raw
materials/reduction of emissions and wastes from the process itself
may be applied. However, very few articles are dealing with actual
implementation of the practical solutions within CP in generic
pharmaceutical industry. In constant attempt to eliminate the usage of organic solvents by following other, more environmentally
friendly industries, efforts have been made in the pharmaceutical
sector to decrease their amounts in API synthesis and drug products
manufacturing (Grodowska and Parczewski, 2010).
Pharmaceutical production takes place in numerous facilities all
over the world and coated tablets are the most common pharmaceutical form comprising a mixture of active substance(s) and excipients usually pressed or compacted from a powder into a solid
dosage form. Although a large number of companies are now regularly practicing aqueous lm coating, lot of other companies still
continue to use huge quantities of VOCs in the tablet coating process as solvent systems for dispersing the polymers, plasticizers,
opaciers, lubricants and pigments. New technologies in polymers
production replaced organic solvents usage in a lm coating process almost entirely, conrming the positive contribution that
technological innovation makes in achieving environmental targets
(Fukasaku, 2000). Still, the biggest motivation for manufacturers
who continue using organic solvents is that their coating facilities
are not fully optimized for aqueous lm coating and in most
pharmaceutical companies more emphasis is given to granulation,
mostly in terms of residual solvents (Grodowska and Parczewski,
2010) and compression of tablets, while necessary steps are not
always considered for lm coating operations. Another important
issue in a highly regulated sector such as pharmacy, is that a variation needs to be submitted for all process modication which is
very often regarded as costly and time consuming, although the
newest technologies successfully avoid organic solvents in favor of
water (McGinity and Felton, 2008). Nevertheless, complete shift
from using organic solvents to a solvent-free concept raises questions about companies knowledgebase and product performances.
Consequently something needs to be done to avoid the harmful
effects of VOCs on the environment and when it comes to tablet
coating, the industry has to choose between EOP and substitution
of solvents, i.e. process changes, the category through which clean
technologies are actually assessed (Belis-Bergouignan et al., 2004).
It is essential that generic manufacturing in particular becomes
the subject of CP analysis mostly because it is based on innovators
know how after the expiry of relevant patents, but still represents
the majority of drugs used for treatment of numerous illnesses in
overall population, particularly due to lower prices. Furthermore,
generic pharmaceutical industry is a very important part of
chemical industry in Serbia due to signicant portion of the production volumes, employment, income and prots with 3.2% in
a gross domestic product of the country. To additionally support the
relevance of the articles scope for promoting the concept of CP
throughout the region, it is important to emphasize that Hemofarm
is the largest pharmaceutical industry with 47.7% compared to
another two major companies in Serbian pharmaceutical sector e
Galenika a.d. (27.3%) and Zdravlje a.d. with 13.6% (Ofcial Gazette of
the Republic of Serbia, 2009). The aim of the presented case study is
to practically evaluate the approach of process modication in the
generic pharmaceutical industry through eliminating of VOCs
against EOP technologies which deal with them, preventing pollution by adequate treatment. For that purpose, the example of
coated tablets production process using ethanol and methylene
125
Pharmaceutical production
tablet coating
VOC emissions
Prevention/change of
technology switch to aqueousbased films
Management and
treatment of waste
streams, i.e. gas (EOP)
Recovery techniques
Condensers
Adsorbers *
(activated carbon,
alumini, silikates etc)
Incinerators
126
Directive 96/61/EC (European Commission, 2003), thermal oxidation (incineration) is not recommended for low gas ows. Besides
ow rate of the gas stream, other key selection issues for gas
treatment systems whose suitability has a signicant impact on the
required capital and operating costs, are contaminant concentrations as well as their nature since the treatment systems are limited
in this respect. For example, the efciency of condensation depends
on the vapor pressure of the contaminants at condensation temperature and only compounds of small molecular size can be
effectively adsorbed and desorbed. On the other hand, adsorption
systems may be very efcient as long as it is taken care to avoid
saturating the adsorbent (European Commission, 2003).
As controlling emissions at a cost-effective level requires
investigation of source reduction opportunities based on the causes
of emissions, it may be revealed that change of technology represents lower investment than the EOP treatment. The implementation of this kind of change in pharmaceutical industry
assumes the following:
product reformulation,
stability testing,
manufacturing process validation,
documentation for submission of proper variations to regulatory authorities on relevant markets, and
revision of manufacturing and analytical instructions.
Active Pharmaceutical
Ingredient (API)
PREPARATION OF
RAW MATERIALS
GRANULATION
TABLETTING
In Process
Control (IPC)
COATING
COATING SUSPENSION
containing organic solvents
In Process
Control (IPC)
PACKAGING
Fig. 2. Film coated tablets manufacturing process ow chart.
The cost associated with each of the above suggested approaches (EOP and change of technology) may be expressed as
xed expenses needed to introduce either the new equipment at
the EOP or to switch to a new, cleaner technological process mainly
from regulatory point of view. There may be also considered expenses for equipment maintenance/organic solvents regeneration,
i.e. annual savings due to lower raw material cost by switching to
the coating process using water instead of organic solvents. Anyway, the industry may most certainly benet from this approach
gaining lower emissions with the unchanged product quality.
3. Case study e the methodology
3.1. The study area e tablet coating process problem denition
The production process of lm coated tablets consists of the
following phases: preparation of raw materials, granulation, tabletting, coating and packaging (Fig. 2).
As the model drug for this study, it was chosen generic diclofenac sodium produced by several companies and used to treat pain
and inammation seen with various types of arthritis. During its
manufacturing, organic solvents ethanol and methylene chloride
are used for coating, both in the same quantity of 15.7 kg. These
solvents evaporate on higher temperatures and the gases are
emitted in the atmosphere through ventilation of 0.67 m3/s capacity. Film coating process starts by introduction of dry tablet
cores into the drum of the coating equipment where these cores are
coated with the suspension. Capacity of the drum used for model
drug coating is 100 kg tablet cores, the duration of the coating
process is: pre-heating 900 s, coating 2e3 h, drying and cooling
900 s. From the coating equipment, the waste air is drawn into the
atmosphere through the ventilator and class F9 lter for reduction
of powder material (DIN EN 779, 2003).
Emissions were measured in 2006 by an accredited laboratory
and the measuring points within the waste gas ow were chosen
near the outlet of the uid into the atmosphere ensuring the
laminar ow. Measuring was performed as individual in order to
control the emission at the facility with mostly uniform working
conditions. According to Serbian regulations covering Emission
Class
ELV (mg/m3)
Thresholda
Methylene Chloride
Ethanol
III
III
150
150
3 kg/h
3 kg/h
health and safety issues are considered early in the process development phase, especially when production process requires validation according to the requirements of Good Manufacturing
Practice, EU GMP (European Commission, 2001) and approval by
regulatory agencies, i.e. applicable medicine approval authorities. In
such cases, retrotting of a process causes revalidation, stability
assessment, documentation preparation and variation processes.
Nevertheless, this approach may still be more advantageous in terms
of cost-effectiveness of the selected solutions for emission control,
additionally resulting in better environmental performance, while
product quality remains unchanged e conrmed through appropriate dissolution proles e performed in two dissolution mediums
(water and phosphate buffer pH 6.8, because of insolubility of the
model drug in acid medium).
Documentation required to le the variation for switching to
aqueous instead of organic lm generally includes the following:
studies which conrm absence of changes in dissolution prole
for one production batch with introduced change (replacement
of organic solvents with puried water) compared to at least
three batches manufactured according to the approved technology (with organic solvents) e Fig. 3;
started stability studies at least during 3 months and more.
Guarantees should be also provided that upon nishing stability studies, the data will be immediately sent to the relevant
regulatory agency and
process validation.
60
Water
50
Drug release, %
127
40
Aueous film
30
Batch 1
Batch 2
20
Batch 3
10
0
0
80
Phosphate buffer
70
60
50
Aqueous film
40
Batch 1
30
Batch 2
Batch 3
20
10
0
0
Time, h
Drug release, %
Time, h
Fig. 3. Dissolution proles.
128
4. Results analysis
Table 3
Testing frequencies for moderate and long term storage conditions.
Table 2
Factors considered for aqueous coating of the model drug and full industrial scale
application.
Identied risk area
Core tablets
Hardness and friability
a
Tablet shape
Lubricationb
0.63e0.70 m3/s
40e65 C
Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose
(HPMC) soluble in organic
solvents, but also in water
over the entire biological
pH range
No degradation during coating
observed
HPMC 3 cP was usedd
Storage condition
30 C/65% RH
25 C/60% RH
3, 6, 9 and 12a
0a, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 12, 24, 36 and 48a
a
Microbiological testing performed initially, after 12 months at intermediate
conditions and at the end of the shelf life (4 years for the product of concern).
Table 4
Overall cost.
Stability and registration documentation
Stability testing (EUR)a
Chemical testing (14 analyses 3 batches)
Microbiological testing (3 samples 3 batches)
Total cost (testing for 3 batches and documentation)
w200 EUR
w420
w315
w935 EUR
a
Chemical testing cost per sample calculated as the sum of labor, energy and
material consumption for one analysis according to the analytical procedure for the
product is approximately 10 EUR and 35 EUR for microbiological testing per sample
(also calculated based on labor, energy and material consumption).
Table 5
Cost of process validation e model drug.
Chemical testing (model drug, 3 validation batches)
Preparation of validation documents (Protocol and Report)
Total cost (testing for 3 batches and documentation)
w30 EUR
w600 EUR
w630 EUR
Jk
al Jkl
(1)
where al represents the relative weighting factor of impact category l (Young and Cabezas, 1999).
Weighting factor is dimensionless number which is used to
emphasize the particular areas of concern. In this analysis, all
weights were set to unity since every area has the same importance
(Moretz-Sohn Monteiro et al., 2009). Main individual potential
environmental impact categories can be divided into two groups:
local toxicological and global atmospheric. The four local toxicological impact categories include human toxicity potential by
ingestion (HTPI), human toxicity potential by either inhalation or
dermal exposure (HTPE), aquatic toxicity potential (ATP), and terrestrial toxicity potential (TTP). The four global atmospheric impact
categories include global warming potential (GWP), ozone depletion potential (ODP), acidication or acid-rain potential (AP), and
photochemical oxidation or smog formation potential (PCOP)
(Ramzan et al., 2008; Mata et al., 2005). PEI index e Iout shows
potential environmental impact from industrial process related to
external environmental efciency of the process plant, while PEI
index e Igen shows potential environmental impact from industrial
process related to internal environmental efciency of the process
plant (Cabezas et al., 1999).
Toxicological properties and potential hazards of the existing
process vs. deployment of raw materials replacement technique
(Rydbergt, 1994) in order to minimize emissions from the coating
phase of the manufacturing process were evaluated using WAR.
WAR analysis covered two cases: Case I e process using organic
solvents and Case II e process with puried water as a solvent
within the coating suspension. In Table 7 total output rates of PEI
for 3 different analyses are shown: 1) Non-product analysis
(product stream was not included in the calculation), 2) Product
129
Table 7
Total output rate of PEI.
Case
I
II
Iout PEI/hr
Iout PEI/kg
1627
3193
0
1566
180300
181900
47.39
93.01
0
45.62
5252
5297
stream and energy consumption were not included in the calculation and 3) Product analysis (product stream and energy consumption were included in the calculation).
Based on data presented in Table 7, product analysis resulted in
highest PEI values, which is expected since the product itself is
biologically active. In analysis 3, the PEI obtained in both cases are
very similar, i.e. the differences between cases I and II are negligible
due to the fact that the inuence of the solution replacement
within the technological process on the environment is signicantly lower compared to product PEI. Assuming that energy
consumption is approximately the same in both cases, it is concluded that the analysis in which product stream and energy consumption were not included in the calculation is most relevant.
Results obtained in this analysis are shown in Table 8.
4.6. The role of the CI program in fostering environmental strategies
to support CP approach
Improvement initiatives started in the manufacturing area to
support performance indicators related to downtime reduction,
efciency and yield increase. Besides working on individual projects, training programs were established with the aim to build an
infrastructure within the company to create different levels of
expertise among the employees (both management and hands-onthe job people) in applying relevant improvement tools and
techniques.
Within these training programs, environmental aspects are
regarded as an important motivating factor to trigger innovation
towards both safety and cost-effectiveness. As a result, the natural
alignment is developed between the environmental goals and
improvement projects selected to increase productivity, obtain
higher process yields, achieve material savings and reduce handling or waste treatment costs. The CP concept becomes an inherent part of the overall strategy to increase environmental
performance and productive efciency using a single concept of
lean manufacturing.
5. Discussion
Data presented in this article indicate that the key differences
between EOP technologies and CP approach are in that EOP requires investment in treatment facility (common for all products
manufactured using the particular equipment) and expenses related to replacement of the adsorbent, while for implementing the CP
Table 6
Comparison of solvents characteristics.
Vapor pressure kPa at 20 Ca
Solvent
Flash point
Ethanol
16.6 C
Methylene Chloride
None
72
Water
None
a
b
2.4
1000
50
None
A high vapor pressure indicates a higher concentration in the air and the increased likelihood of breathing by people present close to the substance/solvent.
OEL: Alberta 8-h Occupational Exposure Limit.
130
Table 8
Total potential environmental impact for each impact categories.
PEI/hr outputa
Environmental
impact categories
PEI/kg product
leavingb
PEI/hr generationc
Case
II
II
II
II
HTPI
HTPE
TTP
ATP
GWP
ODP
PCOP
AP
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.452
4.93E-3
0.452
2.17E-3
4.20E-3
0
0.65
0
1.57
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.32E-2
1.44E-4
1.32E-2
6.33E-5
1.22E-4
0
1.89E-2
0
0.0456
89.0
0.987
89.0
8.5E-6
0
0
0
0
179
89.9
0.996
89.9
4.50E-3
8.61E-3
0
1.88
0
183
2.59
2.88E-2
2.59
2.5E-2
0
0
0
0
5.22
2.62
2.90E-2
2.62
1.31E-4
2.51E-4
0
5.48E-2
0
5.32
a
b
c
d
Total
Total
Total
Total
kg/year
kg solvents
(1:1)/100 kg
product
t solvents/year
Annual
savingsa (EUR)
Product 1
(model drug)
Product 2
Total savings
36,256
30.62
11.1
11,877
4961
37.90
1.9
2033
13,910 EUR
a
The price of ethylene alcohol is approximately 0.97 EUR/kg and 1.17 EUR/kg for
methylene chloride.
values due to the fact that ethanol has a high PCOP. Second most
important category is represented by HTPI and TTP. Drug active
component and titanium dioxide used as an excipient are the most
signicant contributors to HTPI and TTP. As for total generation rate
of PEI for case I, it is obvious that inlet streams contribute only to
generation of local toxicological impact categories. Negative values
indicate that generated products are less harmful than the raw
materials introduced in the manufacturing process. Total generation rates of HTPI, HTPE and TTP have similar values in both cases,
all values of ODP and AP being equal to zero. As for other effects of
cleaner production activities (besides reductions in ecological
damage and different elements related to operating costs) lower
VOC emissions from the coating processes may certainly be utilized
for improving the image of the company within local pharmaceutical sector and creating an ambient of positive public reactions
in the area.
6. Conclusion
Considering the importance of introducing CP into generic
pharmaceutical processes, preferably through small scale
improvement projects, a case study for tablet coating of the model
drug was selected as a very common process, widely used in
pharmaceutical industry in general. Two possible approaches that
may be applied in order to manage pollution caused by tablet
coating were analyzed e EOP and CP approach. The technical solution for pollution control (EOP) was suggested based on the
known criteria dened in literature and its cost-effectiveness discussed in relation to pollution prevention through process modication by the replacement of raw materials. Furthermore, health
and safety risks were addressed for the workers on the manufacturing oor, as well as for people next to the factories and the
algorithm for estimating the human health and environmental
impact of two different processes (WAR) was employed to
emphasize hazards for relevant applications by using process
simulators to determine the impact indexes. The results of this
analysis revealed that, when it comes to tablet coating in pharmaceutical industry, the option of pollution preventing by modifying the design of the process represents a general approach that
provides huge benets both in terms of cost-effectiveness and
waste/environmental impact minimization. It also substantially
improves the impact on people directly involved in the manufacturing process from the health and safety point of view and,
considering the fact that based on literature review all the
necessary expertise, materials and machines are available in
a marketplace, only strong will is needed to completely switch from
131
and Waste Gas Treatment/Management Systems in the Chemical Sector. February 2003.
European Commission, 2006. Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC):
Reference Document on the Best Available Techniques for the Manufacture of
Organic Fine Chemicals. August 2006.
European Commission, 2011. Best Available Techniques (BAT) Reference Document
for Common Waste Water and Waste Gas Treatment/Management Systems in
the Chemical Sector. Industrial Emissions Directive 2010/75/EU (Integrated
Pollution Prevention and Control). Draft 2, 20 July 2011.
European Parliament and Council, 1999. Council Directive 1999/13/EC of 11 March
1999 on the Limitation of Emissions of Volatile Organic Compounds Due to the
Use of Organic Solvents in Certain Activities and Installations.
Fukasaku, Y., 2000. Stimuler linnovation environnementale. STI Revue. Numro
Spcial Le Dveloppement Soutenable 25, 52e70.
Grodowska, K., Parczewski, A., 2010. Organic solvents in the pharmaceutical industry. Acta Pol. Pharm. 67 (1), 3e12.
Hilaly, A., Skidar, S., 1994. Pollution balance: a new methodology for minimizing
waste production in manufacturing processes. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 44,
1303e1308.
IFC, 2007. Environmental, Health, and Safety Guidelines for Pharmaceuticals and
Biotechnology Manufacturing. April 30, 2007.
IMAPs, 2011. Pharma & Biotech Industry Global Report. Appendix D-i.
International Conference on Harmonisation, 2003. Stability Testing of New Drug
Substances and Products Q1A(R2). ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline. Current Step 4 Version. dated 6 February 2003.
International Finance Corporation, April 30, 2007. Air Emissions and Ambient Air
Quality. Environmental, Health, and Safety Guidelines, General Ehs Guidelines:
Environmental.
Jovanovic, J., Jovanovic, M., Jovanovic, A., Marinovic, V., 2010. Introduction of cleaner
production in the tank farm of the Pancevo oil renery, Serbia. J. Clean. Prod. 18,
791e798.
Manley, J.B., Anastas, P.T., Cue Jr., B.W., 2008. Frontiers in Green Chemistry: meeting
the grand challenges for sustainability in R&D and manufacturing. J. Clean. Prod.
16, 743e750.
Mata, T., Smith, R., Young, D., Costa, C., 2005. Environmental analysis of gasoline
blending components through their life cycle. J. Clean. Prod. 13, 517e523.
Mata, T.M., Martins, A.A., Neto, B., Martins, M.L., Salced, R.L.R., Costa, C.A.V., 2012.
LCA Tool for Sustainability Evaluations in the Pharmaceutical Industry. Chem.
Eng. Trans. 26, 261e266.
McGinity, J.W., Felton, L.A. (Eds.), 2008. Aqueous Polymeric Coatings for Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms, third ed. Informa Healthcare USA, Inc.
Moretz-Sohn Monteiro, J.G., Araujo, O.Q.F., de Medeiros, J.L., 2009. Sustainability
metrics for eco-technologies assessment, part I: preliminary screening. Clean
Techn. Environ. Policy 11, 209e214.
Niosh, 2007. Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. Department of Health and Human
Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2005-149.
Ofcial Gazette of the Republic of Serbia No 17/2009 Strategy for Implementation of
Cleaner Production in the Republic of Serbia, Ofcial Gazette of the Republic of
Serbia No 17/2009 Strategy for Implementation of Cleaner Production in the
Republic of Serbia.
Ofcial Gazette of the Republic of Serbia No 30/97 and 35/97 The Ministry of
Environment: By-law on emission limit values, measurement methods and
terms and data recording. 23/07/97, Belgrade.
Pharmaceutical
Market
Trends,
2010.
http://www.pharmaceutical-drugmanufacturers.com/articles/pharmaceutical-market-trends-2010.html
(accessed 06.07.11.).
Ponder, C., Overcash, M., 2010. Cradle-to-gate life cycle inventory of vancomycin
hydrochloride. Sci. Total Environ. 408, 1331e1337.
Ramzan, N., Degenkolbe, S., Witt, W., 2008. Evaluating and improving environmental performance of HCs recovery system: A case study of distillation unit.
Chem. Eng. J. 140, 201e213.
Raymond, M.J., Slater, C.S., Savelski, M.J., 2010. LCA Approach to the analysis of
solvent waste issues in the pharmaceutical industry. Green Chem. 12 (10),
1826e1834.
Research Facts Ltd, 2009. The Top 60 European Manufacturers of Generic Pharmaceuticals. http://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/1087785/the_top_
60_european_manufacturers_of_generic. accessed 02.08.11.
Rydbergt, T., 1994. Pollution prevention through product substitution. J. Clean. Prod.
2 (1), 3e11.
Sammons Jr., N., Yuan, W., Eden, M., Aksoy, B., Cullinan, H., 2008. Optimal biorenery product allocation by combining process and economic modeling.
Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 86, 800e808.
Savi
c, M., Jovanovi
c, M., Tanasijevi
c, J., Oci
c, O., Spasi
c, A., Jovani
c, P., Nikoli
c, I., 2011.
Primena algoritma za redukovanje otpada u analizi uticaja na
zivotnu sredinu:
primer proizvodnje bitumena. Hem. Ind.. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/
HEMIND101108011S
Shah, J., 2012. Guidance notes on tools for pollution management e Cleaner production. In: Ahmed, K. (Ed.), Getting to Green: A Sourcebook of Pollution
Management Policy Tools for Growth and Competitiveness. World Bank Group,
pp. 173e183.
Slater, C.S., Savelski, M.J., Hesketh, R.P., Frey, E., 2006. The selection and reduction of
organic solvents in pharmaceutical manufacture. In: Paper 17 Presented at the
American Chemical Society 10th Green Chemistry and Engineering Conference,
Washington.
132
Smith, R., Mata, T., Young, D., Cabezas, H., Costa, C., 2004. Designing environmentally friendly chemical processes with fugitive and open emissions. J. Clean.
Prod. 12, 125e129.
Wernet, G., Conradt, S., Isenring, H.P., Jimnez-Gonzlez, C., Hungerbhler, K., 2010.
Life cycle assessment of ne chemical production: a case study of pharmaceutical synthesis. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 15, 294e303.
Young, D., Cabezas, H., 1999. Designing sustainable processes with simulation: the
waste reduction (WAR) algorithm. Comput. Chem. Eng. 23, 1477e1491.
Young, D., Scharp, R., Cabezas, H., 2000. The waste reduction (WAR) algorithm:
environmental impacts, energy consumption, and engineering economics.
Waste Manage. 20, 605e615.
Ze-hua, M., Na, B., Li, D., Wen-bo, S., 2011. Exploring execution of ecological engineering and cleaner production in pharmaceutical industry. Energy Procedia 5,
679e683.
Zhi-Dong, Li., Shu-Shen, Z., Yun, Z., Yong, Z., Li, W., 2011a. Evaluation of cleaner production audit in pharmaceutical production industry: case study of the pharmaceutical plant in Dalian, P. R. China. Clean Techn. Environ. Policy 13 (1), 195e206.
Zhi-Dong, L., Yun, Z., Shu-Shen, Z., 2011b. Status of and trends in development for
cleaner production and the cleaner production audit in China. Environ. Forensics 12, 301e304.
Zimmer, C., McKinley, D., 2008. New approaches to pollution prevention in the
healthcare industry. J. Clean. Prod. 16, 734e742.