This document discusses the effects of fulfilling a resolutory condition in an obligation to give. It provides the following key points:
1) When a resolutory condition is fulfilled in an obligation to give, the obligation is extinguished and the parties must return what they received under the obligation, restoring the status quo.
2) In case the thing to be returned is held by a third party who did not act in bad faith, the remedy is against the other party, not the third party.
3) The obligation of mutual restitution applies not only to things received but also to fruits and interests.
4) Fulfilling a resolutory condition converts the creditor into a debtor with an obligation to return things
This document discusses the effects of fulfilling a resolutory condition in an obligation to give. It provides the following key points:
1) When a resolutory condition is fulfilled in an obligation to give, the obligation is extinguished and the parties must return what they received under the obligation, restoring the status quo.
2) In case the thing to be returned is held by a third party who did not act in bad faith, the remedy is against the other party, not the third party.
3) The obligation of mutual restitution applies not only to things received but also to fruits and interests.
4) Fulfilling a resolutory condition converts the creditor into a debtor with an obligation to return things
This document discusses the effects of fulfilling a resolutory condition in an obligation to give. It provides the following key points:
1) When a resolutory condition is fulfilled in an obligation to give, the obligation is extinguished and the parties must return what they received under the obligation, restoring the status quo.
2) In case the thing to be returned is held by a third party who did not act in bad faith, the remedy is against the other party, not the third party.
3) The obligation of mutual restitution applies not only to things received but also to fruits and interests.
4) Fulfilling a resolutory condition converts the creditor into a debtor with an obligation to return things
This document discusses the effects of fulfilling a resolutory condition in an obligation to give. It provides the following key points:
1) When a resolutory condition is fulfilled in an obligation to give, the obligation is extinguished and the parties must return what they received under the obligation, restoring the status quo.
2) In case the thing to be returned is held by a third party who did not act in bad faith, the remedy is against the other party, not the third party.
3) The obligation of mutual restitution applies not only to things received but also to fruits and interests.
4) Fulfilling a resolutory condition converts the creditor into a debtor with an obligation to return things
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3
Art.
1190 When the condition have for
their purpose the extinguishment of an obligation to give, the parties, upon the fulfillment of said conditions, shall return to each other what they have received. In case of loss, deterioration or improvement of the thing, the provisions which, with respect to the debtor, are laid down in the preceding article shall be applied to the party who is bound to return. As for obligation to do and not to do, the provisions of the second paragraph of article 1187 shall be observed as regards the effect of the extinguishment of the obligation. Effects if fulfillment of resolutory condition (1) In obligation to give when the resolutory condition in an obligation to give is fulfilled, the obligation is extinguished (art. 1181) and the parties are obliged to return to each other what they have received under the obligation. (a) There is return to the status quo. In other words, the effect of the fulfillment of the condition is retroactive. (b) In case the thing to be returned is legally in the possession of a third person who did not act in
bad faith, the remedy of the party
entitled to restitution is against the other. (c) The obligation of mutual restitution is absolute. It applies not only to thing received but also to the fruits and interests. (d) In obligations to give subject to suspensive condition, the retroactivity admits exceptions according as the obligation is bilateral or unilateral. The reason for the difference is quite plain. The happening of the suspensive condition gives birth to the obligation. On the other hand, the fulfillment of the resolutory condition produces the extinguishment of the obligation as though it had never existed. The only possible exception is when the intention of the parties is otherwise. Ex: X allows Y to use the formers car until X returns from the province. Upon the return of X from the province, Y must give back the car. The effect of the happening of the condition is to annul the obligation as if it had never been constituted at all. In this case, the parties intend the return of the car. Applicability of Article 1189 to party with obligation to return. In the first example above, X is the debtor and Y, the creditor. Pending
fulfillment of the resolutory condition the
return of X from the province. Upon the happening of the condition, X becomes the creditor with a right to demand the return of the car and Y, the debtor, with the obligation to return the car. Stated in another way, the happening of a resolutory condition has the same effect on the creditor as the happening of a suspensive condition has on the debtor an obligation arises. The fulfillment of the resolutory condition converts the creditor into debtor, and the debtor into creditor. Hence, the applicability of the provisions of article 1189 in case of loss, deterioration or improvement of the thing. Pending the fulfillment of the condition, the parties are entitles to the rights granted by article 1188. Art. 11991. The power to rescind obligations is implied in reciprocal ones, in case one of the obligors should not comply with what is incumbent upon him. The injured party may choose between the fulfillment and the rescission of the obligation with the payment of damages in either case. He may also seek rescission even after he has choses fulfillment, if the latter should become impossible.
The court shall decree the rescission
claimed, unless there be just cause authorizing the fixing or a period. This is understood to be without prejudice to the rights of third persons who have acquired the thing, in accordance with articles 1385 and 1388 and the mortgage law. Kinds of obligation according to the person obliged. They are: (1) Unilateral - when only one party is obliged to comply with a prestation. Ex: donation; in a contract of loan, the lender has the obligation to give. After the lender has complied with his obligation, the debtor has the obligation to play. (2) Bilateral when both parties are mutually bound to each other. In other words, both parties are debtors and creditors of each other. Bilateral obligations may be reciprocal or non-reciprocal. (a) Reciprocal obligations are those which arise from the same cause and in which each party us a debtor and creditor of the other, such that the performance of one is designed to be the equivalent and the condition
for the performance of the
other. Each party may treat the fulfillment of what is incumbent upon the other as a suspensive condition to his obligation and its non-fulfillment, as a tacit or implied resolutory condition giving him the right to demand the rescission of the contract.
In a contract of sale, in the absence of
any stipulation upon the delivery of the thing sold by the seller us conditioned upon the simultaneous payment of the purchase price by the buyer, and vice versa. The seller is the creditor as to the price and debtor as to the thing, while the buyer is the creditor as to the thing and debtor as to price.