Global
Global
Global
Germanwatch 2014
Germanwatch 2014
Further reading:
Archer, D. and S. Rahmstorf (2009): The Climate Crisis: An Introductory Guide to Climate Change. Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge.
Burck, J. et al. (2013): The Climate Change Performance Index. Results 2014. Germanwatch, Bonn.
http://germanwatch.org/en/7677 (Accessed 10.02.2014).
Kreft, S. and D. Eckstein (2013): Global Climate Risk Index 2014. Germanwatch, Bonn.
http://germanwatch.org/de/7659. (Accessed 27.01.2014).
IPCC (2013): Summary for Policymakers. In: 9, 20, 2013 The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working
Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Stocker, T.F., D. Qin,
G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S. K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex and P.M. Midgley (eds.)]. Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.
http://www.climate2013.org/spm (Accessed 24.01.2014).
The World Bank (2012): Turn Down the Heat. Why a 4C Warmer World Must be Avoided. International Bank for
Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank, Washington.
http://climatechange.worldbank.org/sites/default/files/Turn_Down_the_heat_Why_a_4_degree_centrigrade_
warmer_world_must_be_avoided.pdf (Accessed 18.02.2014).
Germanwatch
Following the motto Observing, Analysing, Acting,
Germanwatch has been actively promoting global equity
and the preservation of livelihoods since 1991. In doing
so, we focus on the politics and economics of the North
and their worldwide consequences. The situation of marginalised people in the South is the starting point of our
work. Together with our members and supporters as well
as with other actors in civil society, we intend to represent
a strong lobby for sustainable development.
We attempt to approach our goals by advocating for the
prevention of dangerous climate change, food security,
and compliance of companies with human rights.
Germanwatch is funded by membership fees, donations,
grants from the Stiftung Zukunftsfhigkeit (Foundation
for Sustainability) as well as grants from various other
public and private donors.
February 2014
Global climate change General issues
The melting glaciers Glacial lake outburst floods in
Nepal and Switzerland
Imprint
Sea level rise Consequences for coastal and lowland
areas: Bangladesh and the Netherlands
Going under! The threat of rising sea levels for the small
island nation of Tuvalu
The threat to tropical rainforests and international
climate protection
Climate change and food security Trends and key
challenges
Extreme events and climate change Insurances for
developing countries
See: www.germanwatch.org/en/worksheets
All worksheets are also available in German.
WORKSHEET
M1
(Source: Bauer, J. et al. (2001): Physische Geographie. Materialien fr den Sekundarbereich II Geographie. Hannover, p. 81, significantly modified and supplemented.)
EXERCISE
Germanwatch 2014
WORKSHEET
M2
The first indication of a greenhouse effect in the atmosphere caused by humans was published by Swedish scientist Svante Arrhenius in 1896. He put forward the theory that the increase in industrial coal combustion could
cause the atmospheric concentration of CO2 to double.
M3
M4
Change in the global mean temperature (year values blue, smoothing red) based on NASA data.
(Source: Rahmstorf, S. (2013): Globale Temperatur 2012. In: Spektrum SciLogs, Klimalounge, based on NASA data.
http://www.scilogs.de/wblogs/blog/klimalounge/klimadaten/2013-01-20/globale-temperatur-2012, accessed 24.01.2014)
Germanwatch 2014
WORKSHEET
M5
According to the IPCC, the concentration of the greenhouse gases carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide in our
atmosphere is higher than at any point in the last 800,000 years.
(Source: http://climate.nasa.gov/causes, accessed 31.01.2014)
Trace gas
Anthropogenic origin
Proportion of
anthropogenic
greenhouse effect
(since 1750)1
Carbon
dioxide (CO2)
Combustion of fossil
fuels, forest clearance, soil erosion,
wood combustion
2.02 ppm
64%
Methane
(CH4)
Rice cultivation,
livestock, natural gas
seepage, combustion
of biomass, landfill,
use of fossil fuels
3.7 ppb
18%
84
Nitrous oxide
(N2O)
0.8 ppb
6%
264
EXERCISE
(Sources: 1WMO (2013): Greenhouse Gas Bulletin. The State of Greenhouse Gases in the Atmosphere. Based on Global Observations through 2012;
2 IPCC (2013): Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Working Group 1 Contribution to the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report, Chapter 8)
3. Interpret the diagram M 4 and relate it to M 2 and M 3. What conclusions can you draw from the curve
trend since the Industrial Revolution?
4. Compare and evaluate the trace gases in relation to their characteristics (origin, effect and trend) and their
corresponding influence on the greenhouse effect (M 5).
Germanwatch 2014
WORKSHEET
Development of energy-related
CO2 emissions 19922009
China
USA
India
Russia
Japan
Germany
Brazil
year
(Source: Germanwatch (2011): Globaler Klimawandel: Ursachen, Folgen, Handlungsmglichkeiten. Germanwatch, Bonn, p. 43.
http://germanwatch.org/de/3428, accessed 28.01.2014, based on data from U.S. Energy Information Administration, http://www.eia.doe.gov)
Development of energy-related CO2 emissions per capita of nine selected countries between 1992 and 2009
USA
Canada
Russia
South Africa
Germany
China
Brazil
India
Kenya
year
(Source: Germanwatch (2011): Globaler Klimawandel: Ursachen, Folgen, Handlungsmglichkeiten. Germanwatch, Bonn, p. 44. http://germanwatch.org/de/3428,
accessed 28.01.2014, based on data from U.S. Energy Information Administration, www.eia.doe.gov)
Germanwatch 2014
WORKSHEET
M7
Total
in million tonnes CO2
Change between
1990 and 2011
Per inhabitant
in tonnes CO2
China
7999.6
+251.2%
5.9
USA
5287.2
+8.6%
16.9
India
1745.1
+199.7%
1.4
Russia
1653.2
-24.1%
11.7
Japan
1186.0
+11.7%
9.3
Germany
747.6
-21.3%
9.1
Canada
529.8
+23.7%
15.4
Great Britain
443.0
-19.3%
7.1
Indonesia
425.9
+191.6%
1.8
Brazil
408.0
+112.1%
2.1
Australia
396.8
+52.6%
17.4
Italy
393.0
-1.1%
6.5
South Africa
367.6
+44.9%
7.3
France
328.3
-6.9%
5.0
Poland
300.0
-12.3%
7.8
Spain
270.3
+31.7%
5.9
Thailand
243.2
+202.4%
3.5
Argentinia
183.6
+83.8%
4.5
Netherlands
174.5
+12.0%
10.4
Czech Republic
112.7
-27.4%
10.7
Greece
83.6
+19.3%
7.4
Austria
68.5
+21.4%
8.2
Finland
55.6
+2.2%
10.3
Bangladesh
54.1
+298.9%
0.4
Portugal
48.1
+22.4%
4.5
Hungary
47.4
-28.6%
4.7
Sweden
44.9
-14.9%
4.7
Denmark
41.7
-17.7%
7.4
Switzerland
39.9
-4.2%
5.1
Norway
38.1
+34.7%
7.6
Ireland
34.9
+14.6%
7.6
Luxembourg
10.4
+0.7%
20.8
Jamaica
7.6
+5.8%
2.8
Nepal
4.1
+359.1%
0.1
* energy-related CO2 emissions means that the values dont include other greenhouse gases such as methane or nitrous oxide, nor
do they include CO2 emissions which arise as a result of forest clearance or industrial processes. The data is based on the sectoral
approach of the IEA.
(Source: International Energy Agency (2013): CO 2 Emissions From Fuel Combustion Highlights 2013, Paris.)
Germanwatch 2014
WORKSHEET
M8
India: 3.0%
Japan: 4.0%
Canada and Australia: 3.1%
Russia: 7.3%
USA: 26%
Europe: 27.8%
(thereof 5.4% Great Britain and 6% Germany)
(Source: Hansen et al. (2013): Assessing Dangerous Climate Change: Required Reduction of Carbon Emissions to Protect Young People, Future Generations and
Nature. http://www.plos.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/pone-8-12-hansen.pdf, accessed 24.01.2014)
EXERCISES
Germanwatch 2014
WORKSHEET
M9
M 10
World
1,3
1,2
1,1
1,0
0,9
0,8
Emissions
0,7
Population
0,6
0,5
1980
2000
2010
(Source: updated and simplified from Raupach, M. et al. (2007): Global and regional drivers of accelerating CO 2 emissions. In: PNAS. Vol. 104.)
Germanwatch 2014
WORKSHEET
EXERCISES
8. Evaluate the development of CO2 emissions in China and India (M 6, M 7 and M 9).
9. The first commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol until 2012 called for industrial countries to reduce emissions by 5.2%. One of the USAs arguments against signing the Kyoto Protocol was that the major emitters
among the developing and emerging countries, such as China and India, were not yet obliged to reduce
their greenhouse gases. Evaluate the American position (M 6 to M 9).
10. Analyse the factors which are responsible for the growth in emissions over the last 30 years (M 10), and to
what degree. How do you assess the trend for the last ten years? Discuss the factors which might be decisive here.
11. Simulate a press conference (role play) in which the representatives of various interests, both producers
and victims of carbon dioxide emissions, present their positions on the issue of reducing carbon dioxide
emissions. Speakers should discuss the costs and consequences that preventing or accepting global
climate change could have for the economy and for the affected countries.
Further suggestions
There are numerous CO2 calculators available on the Internet which easily allow you to calculate your personal
CO2 balance. Try this website:
http://www.carbonfootprint.com/calculator.aspx
For air travel emissions:
https://www.atmosfair.de/en/home
Potential exercises
12. Analyse the relative relevance of individual causes of emissions (e.g. your energy consumption, the heating
consumption of your home, etc.) which contribute to your total emission budget.
13. Compare your own total emission budget with the emissions per person of various countries.
Headlines
Climate catastrophes all lies?
Antarctica too warm for animals!
Glaciers melting, seas rising!
The sea level is rising! Will northern Germany sink into the sea?
The climate catastrophe is already here
cyclones, floods and droughts all on the increase!
Climate catastrophe imminent! Will Germany become a steppe?
Climate change worries insurers.
Germanwatch 2014
WORKSHEET
M 12
The AR5 makes clear for the first time the massive impact of anthropogenic climate change on the worlds
oceans. Between 1971 and 1990 the oceans absorbed
over 90% of the additional energy of the greenhouse
Earth. Moreover, the acidification of the seas caused
by absorption of CO 2 represents a major problem.
Around 30% of anthropogenic CO2 emissions since industrialisation have been absorbed by the seas.
The projections for various scenarios indicate a likely rise in temperature of 1.5C by the end of the 21st
century compared to the average between 1850 and
1900. Other projections assume an increase of up to
4.8C compared to the global average tempereature
between 1986and2005.
Phenomenon
and direction of trend
Assessment of a human
contribution to
observed changes
Very likely
Very likely
Virtually certain
Very likely
Very likely
(nights only)
Virtually certain
Likely
Very likely
Likely
Very likely
Likely
Likely
Very likely
Likely
(Source: IPCC (2013): Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report
of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, p. 5 and 18)
Germanwatch 2014
WORKSHEET
M 13
Assumptions
-
-
-
-
10
Calculations
Emission and
concentration
- Greenhouse gases
- Aerosols
World population
Economic growth
Energy mix
Energy costs
Climate projections
Climate change
- Temperature
- Ocean currents
- Precipitation
Climate impact
- Sea level
- Extreme weather
- Health
(Source: IPCC (2001): Climate Change 2001 - The Scientific Basis, New York.)
M 14
1C
2C
3C
4C
0C
Food
Severe impacts
in marginal
Sahel region
Water
Ecosystems
Rising intensity of storms, forest fires, droughts, flooding and heat waves
Extreme weather
events
(Source: WBGU (2007): Climate Change as Security Risk. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, p. 164. http://www.wbgu.de/en/flagship-reports/fr-2007-security/,
accessed 26.01.2014)
EXERCISES
14. Provide a short response, ideally one sentence, to the statements in M 11.
15. Discuss the methods applied and potential problems in compiling climate projections (M 13).
16. Discuss the findings of the IPCC reports of 2013 and 2007 (if required see www.ipcc.ch) (M 12 and M 14).
Germanwatch 2014
WORKSHEET
M 15
11
In the event of high global warming, however, beyond 2-3 C the risk of additional, qualitative changes occurring
in the climate system increases. Such strongly non-linear responses by system components are often referred to as
tipping points in the climate system. This term is used to refer to the behaviour of the system when a critical threshold has been crossed, triggering runaway changes that are then very difficult to bring under control again. Broadscale
parts of the Earth System capable of triggering such instability have been termed tipping elements.
(Source: WBGU (2007): Climate Change as Security Risk. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, p. 72. http://www.wbgu.de/en/flagship-reports/fr-2007-security/,
accessed 26.01.2014)
M 16
Arctic
Greenland
Permafrost
Boreal Forest
North Atlantic
Circulation
Indian Summer
Monsoon*
Sahel
Amazon
Rainforest
More erratic
El Nio occasions
Ocean
El Nio
Melting of the West
Antarctic Ice Sheet caused
by non-linear melting
processes
West Antarctica
0C
1C
2C
3C
4C
5C
6C
The colour scale indicates the point at which temperature increases cause such a system to destabilise.
(Source: Own diagram after Lenton, T.M. et al. (2008): Tipping Elements in the Earths Climate System. In: PNAS. Vol. 105.)
Germanwatch 2014
WORKSHEET
M 17
12
4.0
3.0
s
rou
e
ng
Da
ge
an
h
C
te
a
m
Cli
Tipping Points
2.0
1.5
Unavoidable
1.0
0.8
0.0
2000
2050
2100
Year
(Source: Bauer (2007): Fragile Staaten und Klimawandel: Neue Herausforderungen fr internationale Politik und Entwicklungszusammenarbeit.
Unpublished presentation)
EXERCISES
17. Express the positive and negative impacts of the greenhouse effect in the form of a table (M 14 and M 16).
M 18
18. Explain why many scientists, as well as the EU, are calling for the global temperature increase to be limited to 2 C over the pre-industrial level.
19. Which consequences could an increase in global temperature have for you personally?
Germanwatch 2014
WORKSHEET
M 19
Measures for adaptation to climate change are highly dependent on concrete changes at the local or regional level.
Global scenarios are not enough here. This is particularly
true with respect to climate scenarios, as it is at the local and regional levels that there is most scientific uncertainty, due to insufficient spatial resolution in how these
are mapped. Therefore, many countries see improved adaptation to current climatic conditions as a logical first
M 20
13
Non-climatic stress factors increase vulnerability to climate change by decreasing resilience and reducing the capacity for adaptation through competition for resources.
Coral reefs, for instance, are currently under strain from
pollution of the seas, drainage of agricultural chemicals
into the oceans as well as increasing water temperatures
and ocean acidification. Vulnerable regions are confronted with multiple stress factors which negatively impact
their stress and vulnerability as well as their capacity for
(Source: IPCC (2007): Klimanderung 2007: Auswirkungen, Anpassung und Verwundbarkeiten, p.36)
EXERCISES
20. Explain why developing countries are particularly at risk from climate change (M 18 and M 19).
21. Explain why the field of adaptation to climate change is of increasing importance in development cooperation, and why it cant be viewed in isolation from the struggle against poverty (M 18-M 20). Use the
Internet to research the ways in which German development cooperation is transforming to adjust to this
challenge (e.g. at www.bmz.de or www.giz.de). Where appropriate chose a different country.
22. In your opinion, what are the options available for adapting to the various impacts of climate change?
What particular problems and obstacles do you see for developing countries?
Germanwatch 2014
WORKSHEET
14
Potential solutions
M 21
We are conducting an experiment with
our climate which has got completely out
of hand. We must do everything we can to
slow it down so that we leave a liveable
world for our grandchildren.
M 22
(Source: Germanwatch (2014): Verbnde warnen vor Demontage der europischen Klimapolitik. Umwelt- und Entwicklungsorganisationen fordern ambitionierte EUKlimaziele fr 2030. http://germanwatch.org/de/7968 , accessed 24.01.2014)
Germanwatch 2014
WORKSHEET
M 23
15
Mitigation potential
EXAMPLES OF BARRIERS
Physical potential:
Theoretical upper bound,
may shift over time
EXAMPLES OF ACTIONS TO
OVERCOME BARRIERS
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT
DEMONSTRATION OF
NEW TECHNOLOGIES
NETWORK CREATION
COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
IN POLICY MAKING
LIMITED AVAILABILITY
AND KNOWLEDGE
ABOUT NEW
TECHNOLOGIES
Technological potential:
Approached by implementing technology
that has already been demonstrated
ALTERNATIVE LIFESTYLES
EDUCATION
POLICY INITIATIVES
INSTITUTIONAL REFORM
SOCIAL NORMS
SUBSIDY REFORM
INDIVIDUAL HABITS
Socio-economic potential:
Approached by adoption of changes in
behaviour, lifestyles, social structure,
and institutions
ATTITUDES
VALUES
VESTED INTERESTS
MICROCREDIT
RURAL ELECTRIFICATION
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS
LACK OF COMPETITION
TRADE BARRIERS
Economic potential:
Approached by creation of markets,
reduction of market failures, and
increased financial and technology
transfers
UNDEFINED
PROPERTY RIGHTS
NEW MEASURES
(TAXES, INCENTIVES)
MULTI- AND
BILATERAL PROJECTS
INADEQUATE
INFORMATION
Market potential:
Today
Time
(Source: IPCC (2001): Climate Change 2001 - Synthesis Report, New York, p. 111)
EXERCISES
23. Analyse opportunities for and obstacles to reducing anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions (M 22 and M 23).
24. Find out how the issue of climate protection is dealt with in your town or city, and present local projects and
initiatives in the form of a short report.
25. Consider and discuss what contribution you (or your school) can make in reducing emissions. Compile a list of
personal climate protection measures which you can implement straight away, and review them in one
(or half a) year. Factor in the varying impact levels of the measures. Form different work groups for this exercise.
Germanwatch 2014
WORKSHEET
M 24
16
To concretise their obligations to protect the global climate, the signatory countries of the UN Framework
Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) unanimously
approved the Kyoto Protocol at their third conference in
late 1997 in Kyoto, Japan. In the first phase, industrialised
countries committed themselves to a verifiable total reduction in their greenhouse gas emissions of 5.2%.
M 25
We can choose to believe that
Superstorm Sandy, and the most severe
drought in decades, and the worst wildfires
some states have ever seen were all just a
freak coincidence. Or we can choose to
believe in the overwhelming judgment of
science, and act before its too late.
Germanwatch 2014
WORKSHEET
M 26
17
EXERCISES
26. Explain and discuss the ways in which CO2 emissions could be reduced at global and local levels
(M 22M 24 and M 26).
27. Discuss the difficulties in establishing measures for reducing the anthropogenic greenhouse effect as well as
their implementation (M 21M 24 and M 26).
28. Comment on and evaluate the statements in M 25.
Where do you see the basic difficulties and discrepancies between talk and action summarised?
Germanwatch 2014