- 1-

Chapter 1: Introduction to Spacecraft Propulsion

Peter Erichsen, September 2006

S.1 Spacecraft Propulsion Systems

Spacecraft propulsion is based on jet propulsion as used by rocket motors. The principle
of rocket propulsion was known as far back as 360B.C. In the 13th century solid rocket-
powered arrows were used by the Chinese military.
The Second World War and the cold war advanced rocket missile development in modern
time. Later, space opened up to exploration and commercial exploitation by satellites and
robot spacecraft.

This lecture will introduce the basic

aspects of rocket propulsion, with focus
on analysis and performance of
spacecraft propulsion systems.

Key features and performance

characteristics of existing and planned
(near future) propulsion systems for use
on spacecraft are summarized.
 - 2-

S.2 Educational Objectives

In this chapter you will learn about:

Different applications of propulsion

Typical space propulsion tasks

The main characteristics of spacecraft

propulsion

What kind of propulsion systems exist

 - 3-

S.3 Need of Propulsion

Propulsion is needed to:

Place payloads into orbit: launch propulsion is used;

Send payloads to the moon or to the planets: space propulsion is used;

Position, adjust and maintain orbits of spacecrafts by orbit control: auxiliary propulsion
is used;

Orient spacecraft by attitude control: auxiliary propulsion also called reaction-control

systems is used.
 - 4-

Payloads

The Payload is the revenue-producing portion of a spacecraft load, e.g.,

passengers and cargo such as scientific experiments, TV transmitters, earth
observation equipment like photo cameras, etc.

Spacecrafts

Spacecraft is the collective name of devices, which are designed to be

placed into space, comprising earth satellites, interplanetary and trans-solar
types of space probes. Spacecraft can be manned or unmanned.
 - 5-

Orbit control

ORBIT CONTROL comprises:

Orbit changes:
- Moving a spacecraft to a desired orbit, including plane changes, orbit injection, de-
orbit, etc.
 - 6-

Orbit Maintenance or “Station Keeping”:

- Keeping a spacecraft in the desired mission orbit, i.e. compensating for effects of
disturbing forces like drag, solar wind, gravitational forces, etc.

Attitude control
Changing the attitude, that is changing the orientation of a spacecraft to the desired
direction.
Keeping a spacecraft to the desired direction by compensating for disturbing torques.
 - 7-

S.4 Reaction-Control System

There are the following types of reaction control systems:

Reaction Jets (propulsion): which produce a control

force by the expenditure of mass;

Solar Sails, Magnetic Torquers (magnetic coils):

which produce a control force by interaction with the
environmental field;
Odin Satellite
Momentum-Transfer Devices (reaction-, flywheels): Swedish small satellite project for
which produce no net control force, but simply astronomical and atmospheric
transfer angular momentum to or from the spacecraft. research. Launched in February
2001 on a Start-1 launch vehicle
from Svobodny.
 - 8-

Reaction Jets
 - 9-

Solar Sails
 - 10-

Momentum Transfer Devices of TUB-Sat

Part of micro-satellite “DLR-TUBSAT” with reaction Wheels (Technical University of
Berlin).
Reaction wheels are used for three axis stabilization and orientation of the satellite.
Each reaction wheel is connected with a laser gyro in the same axis. The complete
control loop electronics is integrated in the reaction wheels. Each axis gets the angle or
angle velocity command from the “On Board Data Handling System” (Central Processor)
but all other activities are controlled by the reaction wheel itself.
 - 11-

S.5 Jet Propulsion System

These systems are based on jet propulsion devices that produce thrust by ejecting
stored matter, called the propellant.

The main features of jet propulsion are:

Launch Propulsion for launching rockets with the following

characteristics:

- high velocity increment capability (7 - 11.5 km/s)

- very high thrust levels (ratio thrust/launch vehicle

weight: >1.3 )

- low fraction of take-off mass of launch vehicle for

payload mass (1 - 5%) of the launching vehicle

- powerful chemical rockets

Rocket launch
 - 12-

Velocity increment

Required Velocity Change ≡ Velocity increment ∆v (m/s) of launch/space maneuvers.

(Change in velocity imparted to the launcher/spacecraft by the propulsion system to
complete space maneuvers; data listed are indicative only)

START DESTINATION TYPICAL ∆V REQUIREMENT REMARKS

m/s
Kourou LEO 9 300 Equatorial
(French Guiana) GTO 11 443 (∆v-gain by earth rotation: 465 m/s)
Cap Canaveral LEO 9 500 Equatorial
(USA) GEO 13 600
LEO GEO 4 260 Change of inclination: 28°, Cap Canaveral

1 500 Change of inclination: 9°, Kourou

GTO GEO
1 800 Change of inclination: 28°, Cap Canaveral
North/South station-keeping: ≈ 50 /year On orbit operations
GEO GEO East/West station-keeping: ≈ 3 –6 /year (orbit maintenance requirements per year)
Attitude control: ≈ 3% of total propellant
budget
Earth orbit escape 3 200 Into planetary trajectory
LEO (parking) Lunar orbit 3 900
Mars orbit 5 700

Legend: LEO = Low Earth Orbit (≈300 km)

GTO = Geostationary Transfer Orbit (Apogee: ≈36 000 km; Perigee: ≈200 km)
GEO = Geostationary Earth Orbit (≈36 000 km)
 - 13-

S.6 Spacecraft Propulsion

Spacecraft Propulsion is characterized in general by its complete integration within the
spacecraft (e.g. satellites). Its function is to provide forces and torques in (empty) space
to:

- transfer the spacecraft: used for interplanetary

travel

- position the spacecraft: used for orbit control

- orient the spacecraft: used for attitude control SMART-1 Spacecraft

Mission to Moon to demonstrate
innovative and key technologies for
scientific deep-space missions.
Nov. 2003 – Sept. 2006

While jet propulsion systems for launching rockets are also called primary propulsion
systems, spacecraft, e.g. satellites, are operated by secondary propulsion systems.
 - 14-

S.7 Characteristics of Spacecraft Propulsion Systems

In order to fulfill attitude and orbit operational requirements of spacecraft, spacecraft
propulsion systems are characterized in particular by:

Very high velocity increment capability (many km/s)

Low thrust levels (1 mN to 500 N) with low acceleration levels

Continuous operation mode for orbit control

Pulsed operation mode for attitude control

Predictable, accurate and repeatable performance (impulse bits)

Reliable, leak-free long time operation (storable propellants)

Minimum and predictable thrust exhaust impingement effects

 - 15-

Impulse bits
Impulse bit is the smallest change in momentum required to allow for e.g. fine attitude
and orbit control of a spacecraft.

Storable propellants

Storable Propellants are liquid (or gaseous) at ambient temperature and can be stored for
long periods in sealed tanks, e.g. monopropellant hydrazine (see chapter S1B8C3).

In contrast, cryogenic propellants, which are liquefied gases at low temperature, such as
liquid oxygen (-147 °C) or liquid hydrogen (-253 °C) are difficult to be used for long space
flight missions.

Note: at present only storable propellants are used for space flight missions.
 - 16-

S.8 Classification of Propulsion Systems

Spacecraft propulsion can be classified according to the source of energy utilized for the
ejection of propellant:

Chemical propulsion use heat energy produced by a chemical reaction to generate

gases at high temperature and pressure in a combustion chamber. These hot gases are
accelerated through a nozzle and ejected from the system at a high exit velocity to
produce thrust force.

Electric propulsion uses electric or electromagnetic energy to eject matter at high

velocity to produce thrust force.

Nuclear propulsion uses energy from a nuclear reactor to heat gases which are then
accelerated through a nozzle and ejected from the system at a high exit velocity to
produce thrust force.
 - 17-

Nuclear propulsion
SCHEMATIC OF A THERMO-NUCLEAR ROCKET ENGINE

Propellant
Tank

Turbin

Nuclear
Reactor

Reactor Fuel
Element

Nozzle Coolant
Jacket

Exhaust Gas

Note
While chemical and electric systems are used for the propulsion of today’s spacecrafts,
nuclear propulsion is still under study. Therefore, only chemical and electric propulsion
will be dealt within this book.
 - 18-

S.9 Summary
Propulsion is needed for launching of spacecrafts, for spacecraft orbit transfer as well as
their orbit and attitude control.

Here, only propulsion systems will be dealt with which are based on jet propulsion
devices that produce thrust by ejecting stored matter, called the propellant.

Differences of launch and space propulsion have been mentioned.

Propulsion subsystem requirements have been listed.

Jet propulsion can be classified according to the source of energy utilized for the
ejection of propellant: chemical, electric and nuclear.
 - 1-

Chapter 2: Basic Propulsion Equations

Peter Erichsen, September 2006

S.1 Basic Propulsion Relations

This chapter is devoted to the basic laws governing propulsion systems. The chapter will
give an overview of the set of equations used in the field of spacecraft propulsion.

Understanding these laws is necessary in order to be able to select an appropriate

propulsion system and to design its components. The basic laws include the ‘Rocket
Equation’, the rocket thrust force and other propulsion performance parameters.

In addition two types of propulsion are presented together with the appropriate set of
equations characterizing the systems in question.
 - 2-

S.2 Educational Objectives

This chapter will cover the following topics:

‘Basic Rocket Equation’

Determination and measure of rocket thrust force

Determination of the mass of propulsion systems

Key parameters which determine propulsion performance,

Principles of chemical and electric propulsion systems,

Chemical and electric propulsion system constraints

 - 3-

S.3 Basic Equation of Thrust

Basic rocket propulsion equations are based on Newton Law of Motion

For constant propellant exhaust velocity ve at thruster nozzle outlet, and with thrust force F
collinear to ve, gives the

The Basic Equation for Force of Thrust

o
F = m ve [N]

From the Law of Conservation of Momentum follows:

∆v ⋅ m = −∆m ⋅ ve [Ns]

which is the change of momentum of spacecraft. This implies the change of momentum of
the expelled propellant.
 - 4-

Newton Law of Motion

Isaac Newton
(1643 – 1727)
→ →
→ d (m v ) d v → dm
F= =m +v , [N]
dt dt dt

For F=0 1. “Every object in a state of rest or uniform motion tends to remain in
that state of rest or motion unless an external force is applied to it”.
For F≠0 2. “Force is equal to the change in momentum (mv) per change in time”

For F1=-F2 3. “Whenever one object exerts a force on a second object, the second
object exerts an equal and opposite force on the first”

The Basic Equation for Force and Thrust

dm o dm o
F= ve = m ve [N], with = m [kg/s] for propellant mass flow rate
dt dt
F = Thrust force [N]
o
m = Propellant mass flow rate [kg/s]
ve = Propellant exhaust velocity at nozzle outlet (≡ thruster exhaust velocity) [m/s]
 - 5-

S.4 Basic Rocket Equation

Total Velocity Increment ∆v of a spacecraft:

v = ∆v mf
dm mf
∫ dv = −ve
v =0
∫
mS / C
m → after integration: ∆v = −ve ln
mS / C
[m/s]

This formula can be also written in a form called ‘Basic Rocket Equation’

‘Basic Rocket Equation’

Tsiolkovsky
∆v
mf −
=e ve
Tsiolkovsky –Equation
(1857 – 1935)
mS / C
 - 6-

S.5 Total Impulse

From the Basic Rocket Equation follows with mf = mS/C – mP :

Propellant Quantity required for a spacecraft velocity change ∆v:

 −
∆v


mP = mS / C 1 − e ve 
  [kg]
 

The Total Impulse delivered by a certain quantity of propellant is calculated by:

τ mp

I tot = ∫ Fdt = ve ∫ dm = ve m p [Ns]

0 0

This equation shows again the importance of the thruster exhaust velocity. For a given mass of
propellant, mP, the thruster exhaust velocity ve shall be high for obtaining a high (delivered) total
impulse, Itot.
 - 7-

S.6 Propulsion Performance Factors

Propulsion Performance is determined by ‘Specific Impulses’ which permits an objective and
comparative evaluation of thrust engines and propulsion systems of different designs and with
different propellants:

Thruster Performance Factor

The most useful parameter for determining thrust engine (or thruster) performance is
Thruster-specific Impulse:

F
I sp = o
[Ns/kg]
m

The Isp is defined as the impulse delivered per unit mass of propellant and which can be
easily obtained by Test.
 - 8-

Thruster-specific Impulse

F
I sp = o
[Ns/kg]
m
Isp = thruster specific impulse [Ns]
F = thrust force [N]
o
m = Propellant mass flow rate [kg/s]

Specific impulses are often quoted in units of seconds, corresponding to a modification of the
above definition to that of the impulse delivered per unit of weight of propellant.

The values in seconds then follow from those in Ns/kg by division with the gravitational
acceleration standard, g (=9.82 m/s2).

F F
I sp = o
= o
[s]
mg 0 w
o o
with: m g 0 = w [kp/s] in propellant weight flow unit
 - 9-

Test
 - 10-

S.7 Effective Exhaust Velocity

F
ve = o
[m/s]
m

ve = effective exhaust velocity [m/s]

F = thrust force [N]
o
m = propellant mass flow rate [kg/s]

From its definition as the thrust per unit rate of mass flow of propellant, it follows that ve is
numerically the same as the Isp as defined above with SI units of m/s.

Note: ve is the ‘effective’ exhaust velocity, - although called ‘thruster exhaust velocity’
hereinafter-, because it is determined by test; therefore, in all propulsion related calculations
with ve, the effective exhaust velocity has to be applied, if not stated otherwise.
 - 11-

S.8 Propulsion System Performance

Propulsion System Performance Factor:
System-specific Impulse, Issp
Another very important quantity is the System-specific Impulse, Issp, which is the total
impulse, Itot delivered by the system, divided by the total mass, mPS, of the propulsion
system, that is, all of the propulsion system and not only the propellant as for Isp:

I tot
I ssp = [Ns/kg]
m PS
Issp = system-specific impulse [Ns/kg]
Itot = total impulse delivered by the propulsion system [Ns]
mPS = mass of propulsion system [kg]

Issp is a very useful tool, but its practical application requires a very clear definition of what
is included in “total mass of propulsion system”.

Details of how the Issp is determined for each kind of propulsion system are dealt with in the
‘Issp Program’ in chapter 4.
 - 12-

The mass of propulsion systems can be determined with help of the overall ‘Propulsion
mPS
System Mass Fraction’ :
mS / C
 −
∆v

I tot = v e m S / C 1 − e ve  [Ns]
 
 
I tot
I ssp = ⇒ I tot = I ssp m PS [Ns/kg]
m PS
m PS v  −
∆v
 I  −
∆v

= e 1 − e ve  = sp 1 − e v e  Propulsion System Mass Fraction
m S / C I ssp   I ssp  
   

mPS = mass of propulsion system (including propellant) [kg]

mS/C = total mass of spacecraft (vehicle) [kg]
Isp = thruster specific impulse [Ns/kg] → ve = thruster exhaust velocity [m/s]
Issp = system specific impulse [Ns/kg]
ve = thruster exhaust velocity [m/s]

The first equation above is obtained from the rocket equation. The second equation is just the
definition of Issp, and the final expression follows from the first two.
 - 13-

S.9 Type of Propulsion Systems

The basic propulsion mathematical formulas presented have to be further expanded for
today's commonly used on-board spacecraft propulsion system types:

Chemical Propulsion Systems

The energy to produce thrust is stored in the propellant, which is released by chemical
reactions and the propellant is then accelerated to a high velocity by expanding it in form
of gas through a nozzle.

Electric Propulsion Systems

The energy to produce thrust is not stored in the propellant but has to be supplied from
outside by an extra power source, e.g. nuclear, solar radiation receivers or batteries.

Thrust is produced by:

- expansion of hot gas (which is heated by electric current)
- accelerating of charged particles in electric or magnetic fields to high expulsion
velocities.
 - 14-

S.10 Chemical Propulsion

Chemical Propulsion is based on the principle of converting chemical energy into kinetic
energy of the exhaust gases in a nozzle of a rocket propulsion device.

Typically, rockets using solid propellants are called motors and rockets using liquids are
called engines. The term thruster is used for small thrust applications, e.g. in spacecraft
auxiliary propulsion systems.

Rocket propulsion device basic parts

 - 15-

Rocket propulsion device basic parts

A rocket propulsion device has 3 basic parts:

Thrust (combustion) Chamber, where the propellant burns, producing hot gas
Converging section (throat), to constrict the flow of hot gases, thus controlling chamber
pressure and mass flow rate
Nozzle, to accelerate the gas flow to high velocity in the desired direction

The schematic of a rocket engine is presented below, showing the main rocket thrust chamber
performance parameters.
 - 16-

Maximum Exhaust Velocity

Conservation of energy applied for gas flow in nozzles:

decrease of enthalpy H (H=cpT) is equal to the increase of kinetic energy (½ Mv2)

applied to one mole of perfect gas → the velocity of the gas when leaving the nozzle exit
(index E) is given
2
vE = (H o − H E ) [m/s]
M
and the theoretical maximum value for vE is for HE=0, that is all enthalpy has been used to
increase the kinetic energy of the expelled gas molecules:

v E max =
2
(H o ) = 2κ RT [m/s]
M κ −1 M

where κ is the ratio of specific heat, R is the universal gas constant, T is the absolute
temperature and M is the molecular mass.

Note that the exhaust velocity is a function of mainly temperature T and molar mass M
T
vE ≈ [m/s]
M
 - 17-

The Effective Exhaust Velocity (measured) is:

PE AE F
ve = v E + o
= C ∗C F = o
[m/s]
m m

ve
Typical values of : 0.85 – 0.95 for cold gas
v E max
0.60 – 0.80 for hot gas

ve < vEmax is due to:

Thermal losses in the motor

Friction losses in nozzle (boundary losses due to separation of gas flow from nozzle wall)

Nozzle exit pressure PE > P∞ governed by nozzle expansion ratio (< 200)

Losses due to gas condensation and gas dissociation in nozzle

 - 18-

S.11 Electrical Propulsion

An Electric Propulsion system is a mass expulsion system in which electric energy is used to
create or augment the kinetic energy in the expelled mass. Consequently electric power will be
of main interest in the performance evaluation of such systems.

Kinetic Energy of Ejected Matter

1
E jet = m p ve2 [Ws]
2
Power of the Jet
dE jet 1o 2 v
Pjet = = m ve = F e [W]
dt 2 2

Power Input
Pjet
v e2 veo
P= =m =F [W]
η 2η 2η

where η is the power conversion efficiency.

 - 19-

Kinetic energy in the expelled mass

Electric propulsion leads to higher exhaust velocities achieved by chemical propulsion (ve
< 5000 m/s), by this saving mass of propellant.

Power Input
Since power is the major constrain for electric thrusters on spacecraft, the following example will
illustrate the impact of power on limiting of thrust levels for electric propulsion.
The power input to a thruster system is:
ve 2η
P=F [W] F=P [N]
2η ve
With the assumption:
P = 1000W power input
η = 1 (to simplify)
ve = 30 000 m/s typically for electric thrusters

The resulting thrust will be:

2 W ≡ Nm / s 
F = 1000   = 0.067[N ]
30000  m / s 

Conclusion: Thrust levels of electric propulsion will be << thrust levels of chemical propulsion
 - 20-

S.12 Summary
Fundamentals of rocket propulsion:

- Thrust force is generated by expelling mass (initially stored in the spacecraft) from the
spacecraft at high velocity;

- ‘Basic Rocket Equation’ trades off exhaust velocity ve with spacecraft mass fraction R;

Propulsion performance is determined by ‘Specific Impulses’:

- Thruster-specific impulse, Isp (Ns/kg), which is numerically the same (If defined with SI
units of m/s) as the effective exhaust velocity ve (m/s), - although called ‘thruster
exhaust velocity’ hereinafter. The exhaust velocity increases with increasing gas
temperature and decreasing molar mass.

- Propulsion System-specific Impulse, Issp (Ns/kg), which is the total impulse, Itot (Ns)
delivered by the system, divided by the system total mass, mPS (kg).

Mass of propulsion systems can be determined with help of the overall ‘Propulsion System
Mass Fraction’, mPS/mS/C.

Power is the major constraint for electric thrusters on spacecraft. Therefore thrust levels of
electric propulsion will be << thrust levels of chemical propulsion.
 - 1-

Chapter 3: Spacecraft Propulsion Systems Survey

Peter Erichsen, September 2006

S.1 Survey of Spacecraft Propulsion Systems

In the progressing ”Space Age”, spacecrafts such as satellites and space probes are the
key to space exploration, space science and space commerce.

Of particular interest is spacecraft propulsion, which is necessary to maneuver or steer

spacecrafts in the absence of aerodynamic forces.

An overview of common basic spacecraft propulsion system designs is presented together

with supporting tables and graphs.

Key features and performance characteristics of existing

and planned (near future) propulsion systems for use on
spacecraft are summarized. This will help to understand
their potential application based on basic system
performance characteristics like thrust levels, thruster
and system specific impulse, etc.
 - 2-

S.2 Educational Objectives

In this chapter you will learn:

Classification of propulsion systems based on type of energy source

Basic configuration of propulsion systems

Main performance characteristics of propulsion systems

Advantages and disadvantages of propulsion systems

 - 3-

S.3 Propulsion System Options

Spacecraft Propulsion System Options:

Spacecraft Propulsion Systems can be classified according to the type energy source. Both
space propulsion and auxiliary propulsion are performed by the following two main on-board
spacecraft propulsion system types:

Chemical Propulsion Systems:

The energy to produce thrust is stored in the propellant, which is released by chemical
reactions and the propellant is then accelerated to a high velocity by expanding it in
form of gas through a nozzle. Currently available chemical propulsion systems can be
categorized as either: hot gas or cold gas system.

Electric Propulsion Systems:

The energy to produce thrust is not stored in the propellant but has to be supplied from
outside by an extra power source, e.g. nuclear, solar radiation receivers or batteries.

Thrust is produced by:

- Expansion of hot gas (which is heated by electric current) in a nozzle,
- Accelerating of charged particles in electric or magnetic fields to high expulsion
velocities.
 - 4-

Classified According to the Type Energy Source

 - 5-

Chemical Propulsion Systems

Chemical Propulsion systems comprise the following main components

Storage and feed system that stores and feeds the propellant to the thrusters to generate
thrust
Valves, piping which connects the propellant storage system with the thruster
Electric control unit to operate electrically the valves and thrusters
 - 6-

Electric Propulsion Systems

Electric propulsion systems comprise the following main components:

Storage and feed system that stores and feeds the propellant to the thrusters to generate
thrust
Valves, piping which connects the propellant storage system with the thruster
Electric control unit to operate electrically the valves and thrusters
Electric power supply and power processing system
 - 7-

S.4 Cold and Hot Gas Systems

Cold Gas Systems operate with propellants like compressed inert gas (e.g. nitrogen: N2) or
high vapor pressure hydrocarbons (e.g. propane: C3H8).

- Main performance
- Advantages
- Disadvantages
- Conclusion

Hot Gas Systems are the most common type of propulsion systems for space applications.
They can be divided into three basic categories defined by the physical state of the stored
propellants in the propulsion system.

In contrast to compressed gas and vaporizing liquids, liquid propellants in hot gas
systems need to be pressurized in the tank to feed the thrusters with propellant.
These systems are called pressure-fed systems. Note
 - 8-

Cold Gas Systems

 - 9-

Cold Gas Systems (Operate)

Cold gas propulsion is just controlled pressurized gas source and a nozzle. It represents
the simplest form of a propulsion system.

The typical system operating with cold gas consists of a propellant tank, fill valve, filter,
pressure regulator, line pressure transducers and thrusters. The pressure regulator
provides propellant at constant pressure as the tank pressure drops.

A relief valve is incorporated downstream of the pressure regulator to prevent system

rupture in the case of a regulator failure. With regard to compressed gas systems, the cold
gas is stored at high pressures in a tank.

The vaporizing liquid system is characterized by a liquid propellant pressurized by its own
equilibrium vapor pressure and the expulsion of its vapor through a nozzle. In order to
provide completely vaporized gas, a vaporized is included in liquid cold gas systems.

Nitrogen, argon, krypton, Freon 14, ammonia and propane have been employed in
operational spacecraft, but nitrogen has been the most common cold-gas propellant.
 - 10-

Propellants

CHARACTERISTICS OF SOME CANDIDATE COLD GAS PROPELLANTS

 - 11-

Typical System
 - 12-

Thrusters
- 13-
 - 14-

Main performance of Cold Gas Systems

- Thrust level: 0.0045 ÷ 10 N
- Impulse bit: ≥ 10-5 Ns (with thruster minimum on-time of 5 ms)

Note from the propellant table:

- Thruster-spec. Impulse: 275 ÷ 2668 Ns/kg [≡ ve (m/s)]
- System-spec. Impulse: 200 ÷ 700 Ns/kg

Although hydrogen gas provides the highest Thruster-spec. Impulse, it offers the lowest
System spec. Impulse because of the low gas density with resulting high mass of
propellant storage system (tank + gas).

In contrary, systems operating with vapor pressure hydrocarbons (e.g. propane: C3H8) have
higher System-spec. Impulses because of the high gas density (stored as a liquid).
However, because of simplicity, nitrogen has been the most common cold-gas propellant.
 - 15-

Advantages
Simplicity and reliability
Lowest cost propulsion system
Very low thrust (≥ 0.0045 N) and impulse bit (≥ 10-5 N) capability
Low contamination of exhaust gases (plume) on spacecraft outer surface

Disadvantages
Low Isp (≤ 950 Ns/kg) ≡ low Issp (≤ 700 Ns/kg) with resulting high system mass

Conclusion
Although of moderate impulse capability, cold gas systems, in particular systems
operating with compressed cold gas, are still of interest in view of their simplicity, high
reliability and repeatability of impulse bit.
Therefore, cold gas has many applications where simplicity is more important than high
performance.

For increasing absolute levels of thrust and impulse requirements for spacecraft
propulsion (e.g. attitude and orbit control), cold gas systems are inadequate and more
energetic propellants generating hot gas for mass expulsion are required.
 - 16-

S.5 Categories of Hot Gas Systems

REMEMBER!
In order to obtain higher Issp, in the first instance higher ve is needed. This can be achieved
by increasing the temperature of the exhaust gases to be expanded in the thruster nozzle.

Hot Gas Systems

Hot gas systems are the most common type of propulsion system used for space
applications.
 - 17-

Liquid Propellants
Characteristics of Liquid (storable) Propellants for Spacecraft Applications
 - 18-

Pressure-Fed Systems

Note
Note that due to long space flight mission duration, only pressure-fed systems are used
because of their inherent simplicity compared with pump-fed systems, which are used
commonly for launch propulsion.
In addition, for long space flight missions, only storable propellants, which can be stored
for long periods in sealed tanks, are used.
 - 19-

S.6 Liquid Propellant Systems

Monopropellant systems operate with a single (Mono) propellant to produce thrust. The
most commonly used monopropellant is anhydrous hydrazine (N2H4).

- Main performance
- Advantages
- Disadvantages

Bipropellant systems operate by the combustion of two (Bi) propellants, a fuel (e.g. MMH)
and an oxidizer (e.g. N2O4), to produce thrust.

Bipropellant systems are used e.g. for telecommunication satellites which operate in
Geostationary Orbits.

Here, propulsion systems are needed for spacecraft injection from the orbit delivered by
the launcher into circular orbit, and during station phase for orbit (north/south & east/west)
and attitude control. Therefore, these propulsion systems are also called Unified
Propulsion Systems (UPS).
 - 20-

Monopropellant Systems
 - 21-

Monopropellant Systems (Operate)

The hydrazine propellant is decomposed in a thruster by a catalyst and the resulting hot
gas is expelled through a nozzle, thus generating thrust force on the spacecraft.
A typical monopropellant system uses nitrogen or helium gas to expel the propellant from
a diaphragm tank into the chamber catalyst beds of the thrusters. Since the pressuring gas
is stored (at a pre-selected but relatively low pressure, e.g. 22 bar) in the propellant tank,
the propellant pressure varies with propellant usage.
A typical selection of the ullage volume of 25% filled with pressuring gas (thus containing
75% propellant) will results in a propellant feed pressure decay, and thus in a thrust decay
of 4:1.
This mode of operation is also referred to as the blow-down mode, in contrast to the
pressure constant mode, which requires the storage of a high-pressure gas in a tank
external to the propellant tank (see bipropellant systems).
In a hydrazine gas generator system, the hydrazine decomposition gases are exhausted
into a gas storage tank for later gas expulsion.
The catalytic thruster and gas generator systems have identical propellant feed systems
consisting typically of propellant tank(s) with a diaphragm expulsion device(s), propellant
and gas fill valves, eventually latch valves (start valves), line pressure transducers and
filters.
 - 22-

Thruster
- 23-
- 24-
- 25-
 - 26-

Typical Monopropellant System

 - 27-

Diaphragm Tank
 - 28-

Main Performance of Monopropellant Systems

Thrust level: 0.5 ÷ 22N for satellites, up to 450 N for e.g. Ariane third stage auxiliary
propulsion

Impulse bit: ≥ 10-2 Ns (with thruster minimum on-time of 20 ms)

Thruster-spec. Impulse: ≤ 2300 Ns/kg [≡ve (m/s)] for continuous mode operation

Thruster-spec. Impulse: ≈ 1900 ÷ 2200 Ns/kg for pulse mode operation

System-spec. Impulse: ≤ 1860 Ns/kg

 - 29-

Advantages
Simplicity and reliability (monopropellant)

Lowest cost propulsion system (other than cold gas)

Space storable for long periods (> 12 years demonstrated)

Low thrust capability

Moderate thrust levels available (≤ 400 N)

Disadvantages
Moderate Isp (≤ 2300 Ns/kg) with moderate Issp (< 1900 Ns/kg) resulting in medium/high
system mass

Limited life of catalyst

Satellite outer surface contamination (NH3) moderate

 - 30-

Bipropellant/Dual-Mode Systems
Bipropellant Systems
 - 31-

Bipropellant Systems (Operate)

Bipropellant systems are characterized by the combustion of two (Bi) propellants, a fuel
(e.g. MMH) and an oxidizer (e.g. N2O4) to produce thrust. The propellants are injected
separately into the bipropellant thruster combustion chamber where they react
spontaneously (hypergolic propellant) to perform high-temperature, low molecular weight
combustion products, which are the expelled through a nozzle.

The system basically consists of a pressurizing-gas system, propellant tanks (with surface
tension propellant management devices), propellant lines and thrusters. Unlike hydrazine
thrusters, bipropellant thrusters accept only a limited range of propellant inlet pressure
variation of ≤ 2. Therefore, the high-pressure gas, generally nitrogen or helium is regulated
to the desired tank pressure, e.g. 17 bar. This mode of operation is also referred to as the
pressure constant mode.

The system contains check valves upstream of the propellant tanks to prevent possible
back-flow, mixing, and combustion of the propellant vapors in the common pressuring gas
line. Relieve valves are incorporated in the system upstream of the propellant tanks to
prevent system rupture in the event of a pressure regulator failure. Filters are provided in
the propellant lines directly upstream of the thruster valves to prevent clogging of the
injector or damage of the valve seat by entrained foreign material. Finally, the system
contains pyro- or latch valves, line pressure transducers, fill and drain valves and various
test ports for system check out.
 - 32-

Bipropellant thruster
- 33-
- 34-
- 35-
- 36-
 - 37-

Propellant Tanks
- 38-
 - 39-

Unified Propulsion Systems

- 40-
- 41-
- 42-
 - 43-

Main Performance of Bipropellant Systems

Thrust level: 4 ÷ 500N for satellites, up to 45 000 N for general spacecraft application

Impulse bit: ≥ 10-2 Ns (with thruster minimum on-time of 20 ms)

Thruster-spec. Impulse: ≤ 2850 Ns/kg for F ≤ 25N (for steady state operation)
≤ 3110 Ns/kg for F ≤ 400N

Thruster-spec. Impulse: ≥ 1000 Ns/kg (for pulse mode operation)

System-spec. Impulse: ≤ 2800 Ns/kg

Advantages
Higher Thruster-spec. Impulse, Isp (≤ 3110 Ns/kg)
Higher System-spec. Impulse Issp (≤ 2800 Ns/kg) resulting in low system mass
High thrust capability, up to 45 000 N

Disadvantages
Bipropellant system complexity with added valves, regulators, etc.

Higher cost in comparison to monopropellant hydrazine systems.

 - 44-

Dual-Mode Systems
 - 45-

Dual-Mode systems use hydrazine (N2H4) both as fuel for a bipropellant (N2H4/N2O4) Liquid
Apogee Engine (LAE) and as monopropellant for on-orbit Attitude and Orbit Control
Systems (AOCS) from a common fuel tank.

The propulsion system layout is shown in the popup with the propellant feed system design
similar to that of the bipropellant system, as described earlier.

Advantages
Higher Thruster-spec. Impulse, Isp (≤ 3110 Ns/kg) for orbit maneuvers
Common fuel tank for attitude/orbit control and orbit
Can use higher performance station keeping thruster, e.g. Power Augmented Catalytic
Thruster (PACT) at Isp = 3000 Ns/kg versus Isp = 2900 Ns/kg for F = 10 – 22 N (bipropellant
thrusters) if required.

Disadvantages
Dual-Mode system complexity with added valves, regulators, etc.

Higher cost in comparison to monopropellant hydrazine systems.

 - 46-

Future Developments in Liquid Propellant Technology

Need:

Environmentally friendly, safer propellants.

• Current spacecraft and satellite users and manufacturers are looking for more
environmentally friendly, safe propellants. These can reduce cost by eliminating
the need for self-contained atmospheric protective ensemble (SCAPE) suits that
are needed for toxic propellants.

• Moreover, extensive and prohibitive propellant safety precautions, and isolation of

the space vehicle from parallel activities during propellant loading operations can
be minimized or eliminated. If used on these satellites, the costs for operating the
vehicles will be lowered, in some cases dramatically.
 - 47-

Under Development:

A new family of environmentally friendly monopropellants has been identified as an

alternative to hydrazine. These new propellants are based on blends of e.g. hydroxyl
ammonium nitrate (HAN), ammonium dinitramide (AND), hydrazinium nitroformate (HNF),
nitrous oxide (N2O), and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)

When compared to hydrazine, e.g. HAN blends have a range of specific impulse (Isp) which
can exceed that of hydrazine. Testing of HAN based propellants has begun to show
promise and could soon be adopted for on-board propulsion systems of LEO satellites
and constellations.

Advantages:

Safer propellants (also called ‘green’ or ‘reduced hazard propellants’) reduce costs by:
• Eliminating the need for self-contained atmospheric protective ensemble (SCAPE)
suits needed for toxic propellants.

• No extensive and prohibitive propellant safety precautions and isolation of the

space vehicle from parallel activities during propellant loading operations.
 - 48-

S.7 Solid Propellant Motor

The solid propellant motor consists of a motor case, containing a propellant grain, a nozzle
and an igniter. The main characteristics and performance are as follows:

- Main performance
- Advantages
- Disadvantages

In general, solid propulsion motors can only deliver their total impulse potential in one
firing, because off-modulation is not possible. Therefore the usage of solid propulsion is
restricted to:

- Orbit change (e.g. apogee or perigee maneuver)

- Impart acceleration (e.g. liquid reorientation maneuvers, separation maneuvers)

 - 49-

Solid Propellant Motor

 - 50-

Propellant Grain
There are two principal types of propellants:
- Homogeneous propellants, which are composed of fuels that contain enough
chemically bonded oxygen to sustain the propellant burning process,
- Composite propellants, which are composed of organic fuel binders and oxidizers.

Most common is the use of composite propellants, usually based on solid aluminium
powder held in e.g. a hydroxyl terminated polybutadiene (HTPB) synthetic rubber binder
and stable solid oxidizer (ammonium perchlorate or nitro-cellulose, -double based). The
propellant is premixed and batch loaded into lightweight simple motors.

Typical solid propellant mixtures are listed below:

Double-based Propellant Composite Propellant

(fuel and oxidant chemically mixed) (fuel and oxidant mechanically mixed)
% %
Nitrocellose 51.4 Ammonium perchlorate (NH4ClO4) 62.0
Nitroglycerine 42.9 Binding material (fuel also) 21.9
Additives 5.7 Aluminium powder (fuel) 15.0
Additives 1.1
Total 100 100
Ref: L.J. Carter, SPACEFLIGHT, Vol. 36, June 1994
 - 51-

Main Performance of Solid Propellant Motors

Thrust level: 50 N (for e.g. spin-up/down of small satellites) ≤ 50 000 N typical for satellite
orbit transfer applications; up to 5 ·106 N for launcher/spacecraft application.
Delivered impulse: ~10 Ns (F =50 N, e.g. spin-up/down of small satellites) ≤ 107 Ns for
satellite orbit transfer applications
Motor-spec. Impulse: ~ 2400 Ns/kg for F ≤ 50 N; ≤ 3000 Ns/kg for F ≤ 50 000 N

System-spec. Impulse: 2300 ÷ 2700 Ns/kg (~120 Ns/kg for F ≤ 50 N)

Advantages
Relatively simple operation
Very high mass fraction, excellent bulk density and packaging characteristics
Good long-term storage characteristics

Disadvantages
Not readily tested and checked-out prior to flight
Very difficult to stop and restart, throttle, pulse, etc. (hybrid)
Limited Isp performance (2400 – 3000 Ns/kg)
Limited redundancy with associated reliability and safety issues
 - 52-

S.8 Electric Propulsion

In order to increase propulsion system impulse performances for e.g. interplanetary
missions, exhaust velocity has to be increased beyond the 5000 m/s, which is best
available from chemical rockets.
This can be achieved by Electric Propulsion Systems that rely on externally provided
electric power to accelerate the propellant to produce useful thrust in three ways:
- Electrothermal systems (resistojet and arc-jets)
Expansion of hot gas (which is heated by electric current) in a nozzle.

- Electromagnetic systems (magnetoplasmadynamic (MPD))

Accelerating of plasma by interaction of electric and magnetic fields to high expulsion
velocities.

- Electrostatic systems (ion engines: Kaufman, radio-frequency, field emission,

stationary plasma)
Accelerating of charged particles in electric fields to high expulsion velocities.

Survey of electrical thruster with their potential application.

Important comparison between electrical (ion) and chemical (bipropellant) propulsion. Note
the ratios of thruster specific impulse, thrust level and power requirements.
 - 53-

Electric Propulsion Systems

Electric propulsion systems comprise the following main components:

- Storage and feed system that stores and feeds the propellant to the thrusters to
generate thrust
- Valves, piping which connects the propellant storage system with the thruster
- Electric control unit to operate electrically the valves and thrusters
- Electric power supply and power processing system

Electric Power Generator

Energy can be obtained from either sunlight or from a nuclear reactor. In the case of solar
electric propulsion, solar photons are converted into electricity by solar cells.
 - 54-
In nuclear electric propulsion, thermal energy from the nuclear reactor is converted into
electricity by either a static or dynamic thermal-to-electric power conversion system.

Static systems (e.g. thermoelectric generators) have the advantage of no moving parts for
high reliability, but they have low efficiencies while dynamic systems have moving parts
(e.g. turbines, generators, etc.) and they have higher efficiencies.

Power Processing System

Power processing systems are required to convert the voltage from the electric power
generator to the form required by the electric thruster.

For example, a solar electric power generator produces low-voltage DC (typically ~100 V);
this would need to be converted (via transformers, etc.) to kilovolt levels for use in an ion
thruster. The power processing system is often referred to as the power processing unit
(PPU).

Propellant Storage and Feed System

In general, liquid or gaseous propellants are stored in tanks and fed to the thruster
assembly as in chemical propulsion.

Electric Thruster Assembly to generate thrust.

Valves and piping which connect the propellant storage and feed system with the thruster
assembly.

Electric Control Unit to operate electrically valves and thrusters

 - 55-

Note:
For electric propulsion high impulse performance is not dictated by maximum exhaust
velocity, like for chemical propulsion, but rather by optimum values of thruster exhaust
velocity, ve opt, that can be elucidated schematically by the following figure:

With increasing exhaust velocity, ve, the combined mass of propellant and tank is decreasing
while the mass of the power supply is increasing. The point of intersection of the two curves
determines the minimum of the system mass by ve opt resulting in a maximum value of Issp.
 - 56-

Electrothermal Systems

Electrothermal Systems, where the propellant (gas) is heated by passing over an electric
heated solid surface (resistojet) or by passing it through an arc discharge (arcjet).

The heated gas is then accelerated by a gas-dynamic expansion in a nozzle. Typical

applications of this principle are the monopropellant hydrazine operated Power Augmented
Catalytic Thruster (PACT) and Hydrazine-Arcjet.
 - 57-

Power Augmented Catalytic Thruster

 - 58-

Electromagnetic Systems

Electromagnetic Systems, where a gas is heated in an arc discharge to such a high

temperature, that it is converted to neutral plasma (plasma thruster).

The plasma is then expelled at high velocity by the interaction of the discharge current with
the magnetic field (Lorentz force). A typical application of this principle is the Magneto-
Plasma-Dynamic (MPD) type of thruster.
 - 59-

Electrostatic Systems

Electrostatic Systems, where usually a high molecular propellant, such as Xenon gas, is
ionized (ion thruster) by e.g. electron bombardment (Kaufman), in a high frequency
electromagnetic field (radio-frequency) or by extracting ions from the surface of a liquid
metal (cesium) under the effect of a strong electrostatic field (field emission).
The ions are then accelerated to high velocity (30 to 60 km/s) by a strong electric field.
Electrons are injected into the ion beam from an electron emitter in order to keep it
electrically neutral, thus preventing an electric charge build-up of the spacecraft.
In addition to the above described category of ion thrusters, the Stationary Plasma
Thruster (SPT) which belongs to the category of ‘Hall-effect Thrusters’, uses an applied
magnetic field to control electrons in a quasi-neutral plasma discharge.
- 60-
 - 61-

Survey of Electrical Thrusters (Examples of typical performance values)

(Data listed are indicative only)

Type of Propulsion Thrust Power Exhaust Propellant Potential

System Consumption Velocity (formula) Application
(N) (W) (m/s)

Resistojet 0.2 345 1 500 NH3;CH4 Orbit-Control (Biowast)

Hydrazine-Resistojet 0.3 300 3 000 N2 H4 Orbit-Control (N/S)
(PACT)
Arc-Jet 0.2 1 800 5 000 N2 H4 Orbit-Control (N/S)
(Hydrazine)
MPD (Teflon) 0.015 600 30 000 Teflon Orbit-Control (N/S)
RIT10 (Ion.-Engine) 0.01 390 30 700 Xe Orbit-Control (N/S)
RIT35 (Ion.-Engine) 0.271 7 540 31 400 Hg; Xe Interplanetary Missions
UK-10 (Kaufman) 0.011 600 ≥30 000 Xe Orbit-Control (N/S)
UK-25 (Kaufman) 0.196 6 000 ≥30 000 Xe Interplanetary Missions
SPT100 (Ion.-Engine) 0.08 1 350 16 000 Xe Orbit-Control (N/S)
. -3
Hughes 8 cm 4.5 10 175 25 500 Hg Orbit-Control
(Kaufman)
Field-Emission ≈10-5 -2.10-3 ≈ 60 - 300 ≈ 60 000 – Cs Orbit and Attitude Control
100 000
NB: (N/S) ≡ North/South
station keeping for
Geostionary Orbits
 - 62-

Comparison
THRUSTER COMPARISON: Typical Electrical vs. Chemical Figures

(Data listed are indicative only)

 - 63-

S.9 Summary

Main characteristics of candidate spacecraft propulsion systems;

Classification of propulsion systems listed based on type of energy source;

Basic configurations of propulsion systems explained;

Main performance characteristics of propulsion systems listed;

Advantages and disadvantages of propulsion systems discussed;

Still to be done: Propulsion system performances to be evaluated with regard to mission

impulse and velocity-increment requirements in order to enable you to select and size
propulsion systems. This will be done in the next chapter.
 - 64-

Main Characteristics
The table below summarizes the main characteristics of some candidate spacecraft
propulsion systems (data listed are indicative only):
Type of Propulsion Thrust level Exhaust Velocity Advantages Disadvantages
System [N] [m/s]
Cold Gas (N2) 0.0045 - 10 700 Extremely simple, Very low performance, highest
reliable, very low cost
mass of all systems
Monopropellant 0.5 2 200 – 2 300 Simple, reliable, Low performance, higher mass
(Hydrazine) relatively low cost than bipropellant
Bi-Propellant 4 – 500 2 850 – 3 110 High performance More complicated system than
(MMH/MON) monopropellant
Solid Propellant 50 – 50 000 2 400 – 3 000 Simple, reliable, low Limited performance, higher
cost thrust
PACT, Hydrazine 0.1 – 0.5 3 000 High performance, low More complicated interfaces,
(Power Augmented power, simple feed more power than chemical
Catalytic Thruster) system thrusters, low thrust
ARC-JET (Hydrazine) 0.2 5 000 High performance, High power, complicated
simple feed system interfaces (specially thermal)
Stationary Plasma SPT 0.08 16 000 High performance High power, low thrust,
100 (Ion Engine) complicated
Kaufman, UK-10 (Ion- 0.011 30 000 Very high performance Very high power, low thrust,
Engine) complicated
Radio-frequency RIT 10 0.01 31 400 Very high performance Very high power, low thrust,
(Ion-Engine) complicated
Field-Emission 10-5 – 2·10-3 60 000 -100 000 Extreme high Very high power, very low
performance thrust
 -1-

Chapter 4: Spacecraft Propulsion System Selection

Peter Erichsen, September 2006
S.1 Introduction
The selection of the best propulsion system for a given spacecraft missions is a complex
process. Selection criteria employed in the design trades include performance, cost,
availability, etc.
The selection process involves a variety of propulsion options, such as systems operated
with cold gas, liquid monopropellant and bipropellant, or some form of electric propulsion.
The evolution of future spacecraft systems will be mainly determined by a reduction of
space mission costs and extend exploration of the solar system up to interstellar missions.

A software program can be used,

which is based on the evaluation of
system-specific impulses, Issp, and
determination of the overall
propulsion system mass fraction,
mPS/mS/C.
The Issp-program can be downloaded
from the Swedish Space Corporation
(SSC) website http:www.ssc.se/ssd

Issp Program
 -2-

S.2 Educational Objectives

From this chapter the student will learn:

Propulsion system selection criteria

Primary selection criteria based on propulsion system performances:

- System-specific Impulse, Issp

- overall propulsion system mass fraction

The ‘Issp software program’ for propulsion system performance simulation

An outline of the potential evolution of future advanced spacecraft propulsion systems

 -3-

S.3 Propulsion System Selection

In the selection process, the most fundamental criterion for the propulsion system to be
selected is its achievement of the mission impulse and velocity increment ∆v requirements.
Therefore, an important consideration for the selection of a suitable propulsion system is
the trade-off between its velocity increment capability and propulsion system mass.

The mass of propulsion systems can be determined with help of the overall Propulsion
System Mass Fraction (see Chapter 2)

The Curves of mPS/mS/C, plotted as a function of ∆v for different actual spacecraft

propulsion system designs with typical values of Isp (ve) and Issp, give the first and most
important indication for the selection of propulsion systems.

For a more detailed performance evaluation, the software program “Issp” can be used.
It is based on the evaluation of the ‘System-specific Impulse’, Issp. It can be
downloaded from Swedish Space Corporation Web Site.

When suitable spacecraft auxiliary propulsion systems are selected, a refinement of the
selection is carried out. This process takes into consideration additional parameters such
as cost, complexity, operability and reliability of the system (more selection criteria).

This table summarizes advantages and disadvantages as well as the basic characteristics
of different propulsion systems.
 -4-
The curves
∆v-Performance Range of Built Spacecraft Propulsion System Concepts
(Examples)
1,0
Issp=193 Ns/kg Issp=654 Ns/kg Issp=1440 Ns/kg
mPS/mS/C (Nitrogen) (Ammonia)
Cold Gas Hydrazine Issp=1862 Ns/kg

0,8
Issp=2354 Ns/kg
Bipropellant
Issp=2746 Ns/kg
0,6

Issp=6375 Ns/kg
0,4

SPT Electric
Propulsion Systems

Issp=10 801 Ns/kg

0,2

0,0
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
delta-v (m/s)
 -5-

Important indication
If we assume mPS/mS/C< 0.30, we can read directly from the curves of mPS/mS/C:

For low ∆v<150 m/s, compressed cold gas and vaporizing liquid propulsion systems seem
to be the best choice, because they meet the requirement and have the lowest cost;

For 150<∆v<650 m/s, monopropellant hydrazine fed propulsion systems are the best
choice, because of their inherent simplicity (reliability) and potential low cost, while still
meeting the requirement;

For high ∆v>650 m/s, bipropellant systems, monopropellant hydrazine fed resistojet
systems (power-augmented thrusters, arcjets), and electrostatic (electromagnetic) systems
will satisfy the ∆v requirements best.
 -6-

Table of Candidate Spacecraft Propulsion System Characteristics

The table below summarizes the main characteristics of some candidate spacecraft
propulsion systems (data listed are indicative only):

Type of Propulsion Thrust level Exhaust Velocity Advantages Disadvantages

System
[N] [m/s]
Cold Gas (N2) 0.0045 - 10 700 Extremely simple, Very low performance, highest
reliable, very low cost
mass of all systems
Monopropellant 0.5 2 200 – 2 300 Simple, reliable, Low performance, higher mass
(Hydrazine) relatively low cost than bipropellant
Bi-Propellant 4 – 500 2 850 – 3 110 High performance More complicated system than
(MMH/MON) monopropellant
Solid Propellant 50 – 50 000 2 400 – 3 000 Simple, reliable, low Limited performance, higher
cost thrust
PACT, Hydrazine 0.1 – 0.5 3 000 High performance, low More complicated interfaces,
(Power Augmented power, simple feed more power than chemical
Catalytic Thruster) system thrusters, low thrust
ARC-JET (Hydrazine) 0.2 5 000 High performance, High power, complicated
simple feed system interfaces (specially thermal)
Stationary Plasma SPT 0.08 16 000 High performance High power, low thrust,
100 (Ion Engine) complicated
Kaufman, UK-10 (Ion- 0.011 30 000 Very high performance Very high power, low thrust,
Engine) complicated
Radio-frequency RIT 10 0.01 31 400 Very high performance Very high power, low thrust,
(Ion-Engine) complicated
Field-Emission 10-5 – 2·10-3 60 000 -100 000 Extreme high Very high power, very low
performance thrust
 -7-

S.4 Outline of Advanced Spacecraft Propulsion Systems

So far, chemical propulsion has given access to space and has even taken spacecraft
through the solar system. Electric propulsion, still under development, offers a further vast
increase in propulsion system mass efficiency.

The prevailing goal of advanced propulsion is to enable cost efficient space missions and
extended exploration of the solar system up to interstellar missions.

In a first instance, advanced propulsion systems can be derived from existing systems, by
increasing the performance of chemical and electric propulsion with regard to their mission
impulse and velocity-increment capabilities.

New approaches are studied or under development, like:

- Solar- thermal rockets using solar energy to heat a propellant via a concentrator
to high temperature
- Nuclear-thermal rockets using the heat produced by a nuclear reaction to produce
high-temperature propellant
- Beamed-momentum propulsion, such as Solar Sails
- Exotic propulsion methods, such as Photon - and Antimatter Propulsion
 -8-

Advanced space propulsion

In order to achieve efficient mission costs, an important application of advanced space

propulsion is to reduce cost by:
- reduction of the total mass that must be launched from Earth,
- reduction of propulsion system mass fraction, allowing for higher payload mass,
- increase of mission impulse performance, allowing for satellite extended orbit
maintenance and attitude control.

A second goal of advanced space propulsion is to perform extended (manned) exploration

of the solar system and previously ‘impossible’ missions, like interstellar travel.

Consequently, the evolution of advanced spacecraft propulsion systems will mainly focus
on increased performance, that is high values of ‘System-spec. Impulse’, Issp.

Potential improvements of propulsion performances will however require a careful analysis

of development and manufacturing cost as well as complexity, operability and reliability of
propulsion systems. This will have to be balanced against potential gain in propulsion
performance and propulsion system weight with resulting improvement of Issp.
 -9-

Exploration of the Solar System

Velocity Change Budget (∆v) for some

Interplanetary Hohmann Transf Orbits
(Data listed are indicative only)

Destination Typical ∆v values

[km/s]

Mercury 17.1

Venus 5.2

Mars 5.4

Jupiter 14.4

Saturn 15.7

Uranus 15.9

Neptune 15.7

Ref.: Propulsion 2000 Program, Phase I – Final Report,

FiatAvio, Rome (Italy), November 2000
 - 10 -

Potential increase in performance of existing space propulsion systems – Chemical Propulsion

For chemical propulsion high performance, i.e. high values of ''System-specific Impulse',
Issp resulting in low values of ‘propulsion system mass fraction’, is primarily dictated by
maximum values of 'Thruster-specific Impulse', Isp (ve); for details see Issp-Program.
The performance of state-of the-art spacecraft engines operating with cold and hot gas,
however, can be considered near to the theoretical limit for actual space storable propellant
combinations.

The emerging class of micro-and nanospacecraft require miniaturisation of the propulsion

system with help of ‘Microelectromechanical System’ (MEMS) technology for acceptable
values of Issp, in order to achieve a low ‘non-impulse system mass factor’ x.

With increasing interest in environmental and safety issues, non-toxic monopropellant

systems are under development, as already presented in Chapter 3.

Consequently, actual designs of chemical spacecraft propulsion systems are well

developed, but are being complemented by non-toxic monopropellant systems. The
emerging class of micro-and nanospacecraft requires ‘Microelectromechanical System’
(MEMS) technology for miniaturisation of the propulsion system.
 - 11 -

For micro- and nanospacecraft with low ∆v requirements and low thrust levels, e.g. a
cold/hot gas system based on ‘Microelectomechanical System’ (MEMS) technology is under
development at the ‘Ångström Space Technology Centre’ Uppsala University/Sweden.

Micropropulsion System
The system consists of a number of
thruster pods, each containing four
proportional thrusters. The thruster
pods have a spherical shape with
42.5-mm in diameter and
accommodate four independent
nozzles.
The micro propulsion system may be
also used for larger spacecrafts,
which need high resolution of
stabilization and attitude control.

Nano-Satellite with Micro Propulsion Cold/Hot Gas Thrusters

for High Precision Drag-free / Attitude Control
(Courtesy of 'Ångström Space Technology Centre’)
 - 12 -

Micropropulsion System

Nozzle
Ref.: H. Nguyen et. al. ”Micropropulsion Systems
Micro Thruster Block Diagram Research and Manufacture in Sweden”, Proceedings 4th
(Courtesy 'Ångström Space Technology Centre’) Round Table conference May 2002, Nordwijk/Netherlands
 - 13 -

Gas Module Design

(Courtesy by 'Ångström Space Technology Centre')

Valve cap
Piezo actuator Valve seat

wafer 7
Heat exchanger
A B A Thin film heater
Nozzle
wafer 4
wafer 3
wafer 2
wafer 1
3000 µm Pressure sensor Ambient pressure
Gas sensing reference cavity channel
Several filter volume
structures
(different types) Pressure
sensor
 - 14 -

Complete Thruster Module

(Courtesy by 'Ångström Space Technology Centre')
 - 15 -

Potential increase in performance of existing space propulsion systems – Electric Propulsion

Most promising for further increase of propulsive performance capabilities is the use of
electric propulsion. This technology, although still under development, has proven to
achieve thruster exhaust velocities ve an order of magnitude higher than the best
performing chemical thrust engines.

Although electric propulsion leads to substantial propellant mass savings compared with
chemical propulsion, considerable power consumption will require increased mass of
power supply systems. Therefore, for electric propulsion, the determination of the system-
specific impulse, Issp, requires also the consideration of contained mass of the power
supply/power processing systems and thruster, mEl. Here high performance is not dictated
by maximum but rather by optimum values of thruster exhaust velocity, ve-opt.

For electric propulsion, high values of Issp will be achieved mainly for high values of ve-opt.
which requires particularly high values of overall specific power γ, overall power
conversion efficiency η and thrust operation time τ .

From parametric investigations it is obvious, that for deep space missions mainly power
supply systems with high specific power γ need to be further developed to achieve high
values of Issp. For high optimum thruster exhaust velocity, ve-opt, e.g. Field Emission Electric
Propulsion (FEEP) will have to be used.
 - 16 -

Field Emission Electric Propulsion (FEEP) Thruster

• Very High Isp

≈ 6000 to 10000 s.
• F = 10 µN to 2 mN
• Cesium, Rubidium, Indium.
• Efficiency = 98%
- (Ion~30%; PPT~17
• Self contained propellant
reservoir.
• No moving parts.
 - 17 -
New Approaches in Advanced Propulsion: Solar-Thermal Rockets

Schematic of Solar-Thermal Concept: Solar energy is concentrated on a

heat exchanger by using mirrors or lenses.
Propulsion
E.g. liquid hydrogen propellant is passed
through a heat exchanger, reaching very high
reflector temperatures up to 2500 K, before expanding
through a nozzle.

FUEL By this, solar-thermal rockets make use of the

Heat exchanger limitless power of the sun to produce relatively
high thrust, F, with high exhaust velocities, ve:
- F = 5 to 10 N continuous for 70 kW
(solar power)
- ve ≈ 8000 m/s
thrust
Basic engineering problems limit thrust levels
chamber due to limit in heat transfer from heat
exchanger to propellant.
In addition, the deployment and steering of
Possible application for future orbit large mirrors to collect and focus the solar
transfer vehicles energy presents an operational challenge.
Status: Several concepts for solar-thermal
propulsion systems have been proposed,
however, so far none have been tested.
(Courtesy of SNECMA)
 - 18 -
New Approaches in Advanced Propulsion: Nuclear Rockets

Nuclear-Thermal Propulsion Concept: There are two main different categories of

nuclear technology for space power and propulsion:
- radioisotope thermoelectric generators (RTG)
and close-cycle (e.g. Sterling technology) for
nuclear electric power, NEP, to power electric
propulsion
- open-cycle nuclear thermal reactors, NTR, which
heat e.g. liquid hydrogen propellant directly to
produce rocket thrust
NEP: Flight heritage of RTG’s with power level < 10 kWe
while future NEP’s aim at 10 kWe to MWe’s for electric
propulsion: ve = 20 000 m/s to 100 000 m/s (FEEP)
NTR: liquid hydrogen propellant absorbs heat from the
core of a fission reactor, before expanding through a
nozzle: ve = 8000 m/s to 9000 m/s, F = 20kN to 70 kN
Extensive research performed into nuclear-thermal
rockets in U.S. in 1960 as part of the NERVA program.
Status: Environmental and political concern about save
ground test and launch of fueled reactor has reduced
research in NEP and NTR technology.
(Courtesy of SNECMA)
 - 19 -

New Approaches in Advanced Propulsion: Solar Sailing

Concept: Solar sails accelerate under the

pressure from solar radiation, caused by a
momentum transfer from reflected solar
photons, thus requiring no propellant. This
force is proportional to the sail area and can be
directed by tilting the sail with respect to the
incoming solar flux.
Because no propellant is used, the solar sail
has an infinite specific impulse (Isp = ∞),
however, the thrust to weight ratio is very low,
10-4 to 10-5 for 9 N/km2 solar pressure at 1 AU.
Typical applications:
- interplanetary cargo missions
- interstellar travel

Status: All attempts to unfold solar sail in

space have so far failed.
 - 20 -

Schematic of Solar Sail Position during one Earth Orbit

Acceleration phase
Solar flux

Limit of Earth atmosphere

influence

Earth

180 deg Manoeuvre

Earth shadow
Drift phase
 - 21 -

Exotic Propulsion Methods: Antimatter and Photon Propulsion

Exotic Propulsion Systems are those “far out” ideas still

under study. They will be required for the ultimate dream of
space exploration to travel to other star systems, as
depicted in TV shows like ‘Star trek’. Two examples of such
exotic propulsion systems are outlined below.
Antimatter Propulsion: Matter- antimatter annihilation
offers the highest possible physical energy density of any
known reaction substance. Since matter and antimatter
annihilate each other completely, it is an incredibly
compact way of storing energy. E.g. a round trip to Mars
with a 100-ton payload might require only 30 gram of
antimatter. However, sufficient production and storage of
antimatter (with potential complex and high storage system
mass) is still very much in the future.

“I have learned to use the Photon Propulsion: The generation of usable thrust by
ejection of photons is still very hypothetic. The generation
word ‘impossible’ with the of photons by e.g. laser technology and their subsequent
greatest caution.” decay in space, involves the mass-energy transfer
expressed by Einstein’s equation, E = mc2. Consequently,
very large quantities of energy will be required even for
Wernher von Braun nominal levels of thrust. Possibly, matter-antimatter annihi-
lation can be harnessed for photon propulsion in the future.
 - 22 -

S.5 Summary

Selection process involves a variety of propulsion options, such as systems operated with
cold gas, liquid monopropellant and bipropellant, or some form of electric propulsion.

Primarily, propulsion systems have to meet mission impulse and velocity increment ∆v
requirements. Therefore, the evaluation of propulsion system performances is a primary
task in the selection process.

The ‘System specific Impulse’, Issp, allows a more accurate determination of the propulsive
performance of spacecraft propulsion systems than the commonly used ‘Thruster-specific
Impulse’, Isp, which only includes the propellant mass. To achieve low system mass, high
values for Issp are desired.

The prevailing goal of advanced propulsion is to enable cost efficient space missions and
extended exploration of the solar system up to interstellar missions.
 - 23 -

Literature
Wiley J. Larsson and James R. Wertz (editors), 1995;
”Space Mission Analysis and Design”. Chapter 17: Spacecraft Propulsion Systems.
Published jointly by Microcosm, Inc.; Torrance, California and Kluwer Academic Publishers
Dodrecht/Boston/London.
Philip G. Hill and Carl R. Peterson, 1992;
”Mechanics and Thermodynamics of Propulsion”. Chapters 10-12 and 14.
Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, New York.
George P. Sutton and A. Wiley, 1992;
”Rocket Propulsion Elements: An Introduction to the Engineering Rockets”.
Sixth Edition, Interscience Publication, John Wiley & Sons, Singapore.
Robert H. Frisbee;
“Advanced Space Propulsion for the 21st Century”
Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol.19, No. 6,November-December 2003
Peter Erichsen, 1997;
”Performance Evaluations of Spacecraft Propulsion Systems in Relation to Mission Impulse
Requirements”
Proceedings of the Second European Spacecraft Propulsion Conference, 27-29 May, 1997 (ESA
SP-398, Aug. 1997)
Peter Erichsen, 2003
“Directions of Potential Increase in Impulse Performance of Spacecraft Propulsion Systems”,
Proceedings 10-IWCP, La Specia, Italy, Sept. 2003