11-1

11
Substation Grounding
11.1 Reasons for Substation Grounding System.................... 11-1
11.2 Accidental Ground Circuit .............................................. 11-2
Conditions Permissible Body Current Limits Importance
of High-Speed Fault Clearing Tolerable Voltages

11.3 Design Criteria ................................................................. 11-8

Actual Touch and Step Voltages Soil Resistivity Grid
Resistance Grid Current Use of the Design
Equations Selection of Conductors Selection of
Connections Grounding of Substation Fence Other
Design Considerations

References .................................................................................. 11-17

11.1 Reasons for Substation Grounding System

The substation grounding system is an essential part of the overall electrical system. The proper
grounding
of a substation is important for the following two reasons:
1. It provides a means of dissipating electric current into the earth without exceeding the
operating
limits of the equipment
2. It provides a safe environment to protect personnel in the vicinity of grounded facilities from
the
dangers of electric shock under fault conditions
The grounding system includes all of the interconnected grounding facilities in the substation
area,
including the ground grid, overhead ground wires, neutral conductors, underground cables,
foundations,
deep well, etc. The ground grid consists of horizontal interconnected bare conductors (mat) and
ground
rods. The design of the ground grid to control voltage levels to safe values should consider the
total
grounding system to provide a safe system at an economical cost.
The following information is mainly concerned with personnel safety. The information regarding
the
grounding system resistance, grid current, and ground potential rise can also be used to
determine if the
operating limits of the equipment will be exceeded.
Safe grounding requires the interaction of two grounding systems:
1. The intentional ground, consisting of grounding systems buried at some depth below the
earths
surface
2. The accidental ground, temporarily established by a person exposed to a potential gradient in
the
vicinity of a grounded facility
It is often assumed that any grounded object can be safely touched. A low substation ground
resistance
is not, in itself, a guarantee of safety. There is no simple relation between the resistance of the
grounding

system as a whole and the maximum shock current to which a person might be exposed. A
substation
with relatively low ground resistance might be dangerous, while another substation with very
high ground
resistance might be safe or could be made safe by careful design.

Richard P. Keil

Commonwealth Associates, Inc.

11-2 Electric Power Substations Engineering

There are many parameters that have an effect on the voltages in and around the substation
area. Since
voltages are site-dependent, it is impossible to design one grounding system that is acceptable
for all
locations. The grid current, fault duration, soil resistivity, surface material, and the size and shape
of the
grid all have a substantial effect on the voltages in and around the substation area. If the
geometry,
location of ground electrodes, local soil characteristics, and other factors contribute to an
excessive
potential gradient at the earth surface, the grounding system may be inadequate from a safety
aspect
despite its capacity to carry the fault current in magnitudes and durations permitted by
protective relays.
During typical ground fault conditions, unless proper precautions are taken in design, the
maximum
potential gradients along the earth surface may be of sufficient magnitude to endanger a person
in the
area. Moreover, hazardous voltages may develop between grounded structures or equipment
frames and
the nearby earth.
The circumstances that make human electric shock accidents possible are:
Relatively high fault current to ground in relation to the area of the grounding system and its
resistance to remote earth
Soil resistivity and distribution of ground currents such that high potential gradients may occur
at points at the earth surface
Presence of a person at such a point, time, and position that the body is bridging two points of
high potential difference
Absence of sufficient contact resistance or other series resistance to limit current through the
body
to a safe value under the above circumstances
Duration of the fault and body contact and, hence, of the flow of current through a human body
for a sufficient time to cause harm at the given current intensity
The relative infrequency of accidents is due largely to the low probability of coincidence of the
above
unfavorable conditions.
To provide a safe condition for personnel within and around the substation area, the grounding
system
design limits the potential difference a person can come in contact with to safe levels. IEEE Std.
80, IEEE
Guide for Safety in AC Substation Grounding [1], provides general information about substation
grounding
and the specific design equations necessary to design a safe substation grounding system. The
following discussion is a brief description of the information presented in IEEE Std. 80.
The guides design is based on the permissible body current when a person becomes part of an
accidental ground circuit. Permissible body current will not cause ventricular fibrillation, i.e.,
stoppage
of the heart. The design methodology limits the voltages that produce the permissible body
current to
a safe level.

11.2 Accidental Ground Circuit

11.2.1 Conditions

There are two conditions that a person within or around the substation can experience that can
cause
them to become part of the ground circuit. One of these conditions, touch voltage, is illustrated in
Figure 11.1 and Figure 11.2. The other condition, step voltage, is illustrated in Figure 11.3 and
Figure 11.4.
Figure 11.1 shows the fault current being discharged to the earth by the substation grounding
system
and a person touching a grounded metallic structure, H. Figure 11.2 shows the Thevenin
equivalent for
the persons feet in parallel, Zth, in series with the body resistance, RB. Vth is the voltage between
terminal
H and F when the person is not present. Ib is the body current. When Zth is equal to the resistance
of
two feet in parallel, the touch voltage is
E I R Z (11.1)

touch b B th

Substation Grounding 11-3

Figure 11.3 and Figure 11.4 show the conditions for step voltage. Zth is the Thevenin equivalent
impedance for the persons feet in series and in series with the body. Based on the Thevenin
equivalent
impedance, the step voltage is
FIGURE 11.1 Exposure to touch voltage.
FIGURE 11.2 Touch-voltage circuit.
FIGURE 11.3 Exposure to step voltage.

11-4 Electric Power Substations Engineering

(11.2)
The resistance of the foot in ohms is represented by a metal circular plate of radius b in meters
on the
surface of homogeneous earth of resistivity (-m) and is equal to:
(11.3)
Assuming b = 0.08
(11.4)
The Thevenin equivalent impedance for 2 feet in parallel in the touch voltage, Etouch, equation is
(11.5)
The Thevenin equivalent impedance for 2 feet in series in the step voltage, Estep, equation is
(11.6)
The above equations assume uniform soil resistivity. In a substation, a thin layer of highresistivity
material is often spread over the earth surface to introduce a high-resistance contact between
the soil
and the feet, reducing the body current. The surface-layer derating factor, Cs, increases the foot
resistance
and depends on the relative values of the resistivity of the soil, the surface material, and the
thickness of
the surface material.
The following equations give the ground resistance of the foot on the surface material.
(11.7)
(11.8)
(11.9)
where
Cs is the surface layer derating factor
K is the reflection factor between different material resistivities
s is the surface material resistivity in m
FIGURE 11.4 Step-voltage circuit.

Estep I
R
b f
4
Rf 3
Z
R

RB Zth

Th

2
15.
Z R Th f 2 6
R
b
Cf
f

4
C
b
KRs
s

s
n
m nh
n
s

1
16
2
1

Ks
s

Substation Grounding 11-5

is the resistivity of the earth beneath the surface material in m

hs is the thickness of the surface material in m
b is the radius of the circular metallic disc representing the foot in m
Rm(2nhs) is the mutual ground resistance between the two similar, parallel, coaxial plates,
separated by
a distance (2nhs), in an infinite medium of resistivity s in m
A series of Cs curves has been developed based on Equation 11.8 and b = 0.08 m, and is shown
in Figure 11.5.
The following empirical equation by Sverak [2], and later modified, gives the value of Cs. The
values
of Cs obtained using Equation 11.10 are within 5% of the values obtained with the analytical
method [3].
(11.10)

11.2.2 Permissible Body Current Limits

The duration, magnitude, and frequency of the current affect the human body as the current
passes
through it. The most dangerous impact on the body is a heart condition known as ventricular
fibrillation,
a stoppage of the heart resulting in immediate loss of blood circulation. Humans are very
susceptible to
the effects of electric currents at 50 and 60 Hz. The most common physiological effects as the
current
increases are perception, muscular contraction, unconsciousness, fibrillation, respiratory nerve
blockage,
and burning [4]. The threshold of perception, the detection of a slight tingling sensation, is
generally
recognized as 1 mA. The let-go current, the ability to control the muscles and release the source
of
current, is recognized as between 1 and 6 mA. The loss of muscular control may be caused by 9
to 25 mA,
making it impossible to release the source of current. At slightly higher currents, breathing may
become
very difficult, caused by the muscular contractions of the chest muscles. Although very painful,
these
levels of current do not cause permanent damage to the body. In a range of 60 to 100 mA,
ventricular
fibrillation occurs. Ventricular fibrillation can be a fatal electric shock. The only way to restore the
normal
heartbeat is through another controlled electric shock, called defibrillation. Larger currents will
inflict
nerve damage and burning, causing other life-threatening conditions.
The substation grounding system design should limit the electric current flow through the body to
a
value below the fibrillation current. Dalziel [5] published a paper introducing an equation relating
the
FIGURE 11.5 Cs versus hs.

C
hs
s
s

1
0 09 1
2 009
.
.

11-6 Electric Power Substations Engineering

flow of current through the body for a specific time that statistically 99.5% of the population
could
survive before the onset of fibrillation. This equation determines the allowable body current.
(11.11)
where
IB = rms magnitude of the current through the body, A

ts = duration of the current exposure, sec

k=
SB = empirical constant related to the electric shock energy tolerated by a certain percent of a
given
population
Dalziel found the value of k = 0.116 for persons weighing approximately 50 kg (110 lb) or k =
0.157
for a body weight of 70 kg (154 lb) [6]. Based on a 50-kg weight, the tolerable body current is
(11.12)
The equation is based on tests limited to values of time in the range of 0.03 to 3.0 sec. It is not
valid for
other values of time. Other researchers have suggested other limits [7]. Their results have been
similar
to Dalziels for the range of 0.03 to 3.0 sec.

11.2.3 Importance of High-Speed Fault Clearing

Considering the significance of fault duration both in terms of Equation 11.11 and implicitly as an
accident-exposure factor, high-speed clearing of ground faults is advantageous for two reasons:
1. The probability of exposure to electric shock is greatly reduced by fast fault clearing time, in
contrast to situations in which fault currents could persist for several minutes or possibly hours.
2. Both tests and experience show that the chance of severe injury or death is greatly reduced if
the
duration of a current flow through the body is very brief.
The allowed current value may therefore be based on the clearing time of primary protective
devices,
or that of the backup protection. A good case could be made for using the primary clearing time
because
of the low combined probability that relay malfunctions will coincide with all other adverse factors
necessary for an accident. It is more conservative to choose the backup relay clearing times in
Equation
11.11, because it assures a greater safety margin.
An additional incentive to use switching times less than 0.5 sec results from the research done by
Biegelmeier and Lee [7]. Their research provides evidence that a human heart becomes
increasingly
susceptible to ventricular fibrillation when the time of exposure to current is approaching the
heartbeat
period, but that the danger is much smaller if the time of exposure to current is in the region of
0.06 to
0.3 sec.
In reality, high ground gradients from faults are usually infrequent, and shocks from this cause
are
even more uncommon. Furthermore, both events are often of very short duration. Thus, it would
not
be practical to design against shocks that are merely painful and cause no serious injury, i.e., for
currents
below the fibrillation threshold.

11.2.4 Tolerable Voltages

Figure 11.6 and Figure 11.7 show the five voltages a person can be exposed to in a substation.
The
following definitions describe the voltages.
I
k
tB
s

SB
I
tB
s

0.116

Substation Grounding 11-7

Ground potential rise (GPR): The maximum electrical potential that a substation grounding
grid may
attain relative to a distant grounding point assumed to be at the potential of remote earth. GPR
is the product of the magnitude of the grid current, the portion of the fault current conducted to
earth by the grounding system, and the ground grid resistance.
Mesh voltage: The maximum touch voltage within a mesh of a ground grid.
FIGURE 11.6 Basic shock situations.
FIGURE 11.7 Typical situation of external transferred potential.

11-8 Electric Power Substations Engineering

Metal-to-metal touch voltage: The difference in potential between metallic objects or

structures within
the substation site that can be bridged by direct hand-to-hand or hand-to-feet contact. Note: The
metal-to-metal touch voltage between metallic objects or structures bonded to the ground grid is
assumed to be negligible in conventional substations. However, the metal-to-metal touch voltage
between metallic objects or structures bonded to the ground grid and metallic objects inside the
substation site but not bonded to the ground grid, such as an isolated fence, may be substantial.
In the case of gas-insulated substations, the metal-to-metal touch voltage between metallic
objects
or structures bonded to the ground grid may be substantial because of internal faults or induced
currents in the enclosures.
Step voltage: The difference in surface potential experienced by a person bridging a distance of
1m
with the feet without contacting any other grounded object.
Touch voltage: The potential difference between the ground potential rise (GPR) and the surface
potential at the point where a person is standing while at the same time having a hand in contact
with a grounded structure.
Transferred voltage: A special case of the touch voltage where a voltage is transferred into or
out of
the substation, from or to a remote point external to the substation site. The maximum voltage
of any accidental circuit must not exceed the limit that would produce a current flow through the
body that could cause fibrillation.
Assuming the more conservative body weight of 50 kg to determine the permissible body current
and
a body resistance of 1000 , the tolerable touch voltage is
(11.13)
and the tolerable step voltage is
(11.14)
where
Estep = step voltage, V
Etouch = touch voltage, V
Cs = determined from Figure 11.5 or Equation 11.10
s = resistivity of the surface material, -m
ts = duration of shock current, sec
Since the only resistance for the metal-to-metal touch voltage is the body resistance, the voltage
limit is
(11.15)
The shock duration is usually assumed to be equal to the fault duration. If reclosing of a circuit is
planned, the fault duration time should be the sum of the individual faults and used as the shock
duration
time ts.

11.3 Design Criteria

The design criteria for a substation grounding system are to limit the actual step and mesh
voltages to
levels below the tolerable step and touch voltages as determined by Equations 11.13 and 11.14.
The worstcase

touch voltage, as shown in Figure 11.6, is the mesh voltage.

EC
t
touch s s
s
50

1000 1 5

.
EC
t

0 116 .

step s s
s
50

1000 6

0 116
E
t

mm touch
s

50
116

Substation Grounding 11-9

11.3.1 Actual Touch and Step Voltages

The following discusses the methodology to determine the actual touch and step voltages.
11.3.1.1 Mesh Voltage (Em)
The actual mesh voltage, Em (maximum touch voltage), is the product of the soil resistivity, ; the
geometrical factor based on the configuration of the grid, Km ; a correction factor, Ki , that
accounts for
some of the error introduced by the assumptions made in deriving Km ; and the average current
per unit
of effective buried length of the conductor that makes up the grounding system (IG/LM).
(11.16)
The geometrical factor Km [2] is as follows:
(11.17)
For grids with ground rods along the perimeter, or for grids with ground rods in the grid corners,
as
well as both along the perimeter and throughout the grid area, . For grids with no ground rods
or grids with only a few ground rods, none located in the corners or on the perimeter,
(11.18)
, h0 = 1 m (grid reference depth) (11.19)
Using four grid-shape components [8], the effective number of parallel conductors in a given grid,
n,
can be made applicable to both rectangular and irregularly shaped grids that represent the
number of
parallel conductors of an equivalent rectangular grid:
(11.20)
where
(11.21)
nb = 1 for square grids
nc = 1 for square and rectangular grids
nd = 1 for square, rectangular, and L-shaped grids
Otherwise,
(11.22)
(11.23)
E
KKI
mL
miG
M


K
D
hd
Dh
Dd
h
d
K
Knm
ii
h

1
2 16
2
84
8
21
22

ln ln
Kii 1
K
n
ii
n

1
2
2

h
h

1
nnnnn
n
L
La

abcd

C
p

2
n
L
Ab
p
4
n
LL
Ac
xy
A

Lx Ly

07.

11-10 Electric Power Substations Engineering

(11.24)
where
Lc = total length of the conductor in the horizontal grid, m
Lp = peripheral length of the grid, m
A = area of the grid, m2
Lx = maximum length of the grid in the x direction, m
Ly = maximum length of the grid in the y direction, m
Dm = maximum distance between any two points on the grid, m
D = spacing between parallel conductors, m
h = depth of the ground grid conductors, m
d = diameter of the grid conductor, m
IG = maximum grid current, A
The irregularity factor, Ki , used in conjunction with the above-defined n, is
(11.25)
For grids with no ground rods, or grids with only a few ground rods scattered throughout the grid,
but none located in the corners or along the perimeter of the grid, the effective buried length, LM ,
is
(11.26)
where LR = total length of all ground rods, in meters.
For grids with ground rods in the corners, as well as along the perimeter and throughout the grid,
the effective buried length, LM, is
(11.27)
where Lr = length of each ground rod, m.
11.3.1.2 Step Voltage (Es)
The maximum step voltage is assumed to occur over a distance of 1 m, beginning at and
extending
outside of the perimeter conductor at the angle bisecting the most extreme corner of the grid.
The step

voltage values are obtained as a product of the soil resistivity (), the geometrical factor Ks , the
corrective
factor Ki , and the average current per unit of buried length of grounding system conductor (IG/LS):
(11.28)
For the usual burial depth of 0.25 m < h < 2.5 m [2], Ks is defined as
(11.29)
and Ki as defined in Equation 11.25.
For grids with or without ground rods, the effective buried conductor length, LS , is defined as
(11.30)
n
D
LL
d
m
xy

2 2
K n i 0.644 0.148
L L L MCR
LL
L
LL
L MC
r
xy

1 55 1 22
R

22

..
E
KKI
sL
siG
S

K
hDhD
n

11
2

11
1 05 2

.
L L L S C R 0.75 0.85

Substation Grounding 11-11

11.3.1.3 Evaluation of the Actual Touch- and Step-Voltage Equations

It is essential to determine the soil resistivity and maximum grid currents to design a substation
grounding
system. The touch and step voltages are directly proportional to these values. Overly
conservative values
of soil resistivity and grid current will increase the cost dramatically. Underestimating them may
cause
the design to be unsafe.

11.3.2 Soil Resistivity

Soil resistivity investigations are necessary to determine the soil structure. There are a number of
tables
in the literature showing the ranges of resistivity based on soil types (clay, loam, sand, shale,
etc.) [911].
These tables give only very rough estimates. The soil resistivity can change dramatically with
changes in
moisture, temperature, and chemical content. To determine the soil resistivity of a particular site,
soil
resistivity measurements need to be taken. Soil resistivity can vary both horizontally and
vertically, making
it necessary to take more than one set of measurements. A number of measuring techniques are
described
in detail in IEEE Std. 81-1983, Guide for Measuring Earth Resistivity, Ground Impedance, and
Earth
Surface Potential of a Ground System [12]. The most widely used test for determining soil
resistivity data
was developed by Wenner and is called either the Wenner or four-pin method. Using four pins or
electrodes driven into the earth along a straight line at equal distances of a, to a depth of b,
current is
passed through the outer pins while a voltage reading is taken with the two inside pins. Based on
the
resistance, R, as determined by the voltage and current, the apparent resistivity can be
calculated using
the following equation, assuming b is small compared with a:
(11.31)
where it is assumed the apparent resistivity, a, at depth a is given by the equation.
Interpretation of the apparent soil resistivity based on field measurements is difficult. Uniform
and
two-layer soil models are the most commonly used soil resistivity models. The objective of the
soil model
is to provide a good approximation of the actual soil conditions. Interpretation can be done either
manually or by the use of computer analysis. There are commercially available computer
programs that
take the soil data and mathematically calculate the soil resistivity and give a confidence level
based on
the test. Sunde developed a graphical method to interpret the test results.
The equations in IEEE Std. 80 require a uniform soil resistivity. Engineering judgment is required
to
interpret the soil resistivity measurements to determine the value of the soil resistivity, , to use
in the
equations. IEEE Std. 80 presents equations to calculate the apparent soil resistivity based on field
measurements

as well as examples of Sundes graphical method. Although the equations and graphical method
are estimates, they provide the engineer with guidelines of the uniform soil resistivity to use in
the ground
grid design.

11.3.3 Grid Resistance

The grid resistance, i.e., the resistance of the ground grid to remote earth without other metallic
conductors
connected, can be calculated based on the following Sverak [2] equation:
(11.32)
where
Rg = substation ground resistance,
= soil resistivity, -m
A = area occupied by the ground grid, m2
h = depth of the grid, m
LT = total buried length of conductors, m
a 2aR
R
LAhAg
T

11
20
1
1
1 20/

11-12 Electric Power Substations Engineering

11.3.4 Grid Current

The maximum grid current must be determined, since it is this current that will produce the
greatest
ground potential rise (GPR) and the largest local surface potential gradients in and around the
substation
area. It is the flow of the current from the ground grid system to remote earth that determines
the GPR.
There are many types of faults that can occur on an electrical system. Therefore, it is difficult to
determine what condition will produce the maximum fault current. In practice, single-line-toground
and line-to-line-to-ground faults will produce the maximum grid current. Figure 11.8 through
Figure 11.11 show the maximum grid current, IG, for various fault locations and system
configurations.
Overhead ground wires, neutral conductors, and directly buried pipes and cables conduct a
portion
of the ground fault current away from the substation ground grid and need to be considered when
determining the maximum grid current. The effect of these other current paths in parallel with
the
ground grid is difficult to determine because of the complexities and uncertainties in the current
flow.
Computer programs are available to determine the split between the various current paths. There
are

many papers available to determine the effective impedance of a static wire as seen from the
fault point.
FIGURE 11.8 Fault within local substation; local neutral grounded.
FIGURE 11.9 Fault within local substation; neutral grounded at remote location.

Substation Grounding 11-13

The fault current division factor, or split factor, represents the inverse of a ratio of the
symmetrical fault
current to that portion of the current that flows between the grounding grid and the surrounding
earth.
(11.33)
where
Sf = fault current division factor
Ig = rms symmetrical grid current, A
I0 = zero-sequence fault current, A
The process of computing the split factor, Sf , consists of deriving an equivalent representation of
the
overhead ground wires, neutrals, etc., connected to the grid and then solving the equivalent to
determine
what fraction of the total fault current flows between the grid and earth, and what fraction flows
through
the ground wires or neutrals. Sf is dependent on many parameters, some of which are:
FIGURE 11.10 Fault in substation; system grounded at local station and also at other points.
FIGURE 11.11 Typical current division for a fault on high side of distribution substation.

S
I
If
g
o

11-14 Electric Power Substations Engineering

1. Location of the fault

2. Magnitude of substation ground grid resistance
3. Buried pipes and cables in the vicinity of or directly connected to the substation ground system
4. Overhead ground wires, neutrals, or other ground return paths
Because of Sf , the symmetrical grid current Ig and maximum grid current IG are closely related to
the
location of the fault. If the additional ground paths of items 3 and 4 above are neglected, the
current
division ratio (based on remote vs. local current contributions) can be computed using traditional
symmetrical components. However, the current Ig computed using such a method may be overly
pessimistic,
even if the future system expansion is taken into consideration.
IEEE Std. 80 presents a series of curves based on computer simulations for various values of
ground
grid resistance and system conditions to determine the grid current. These split-current curves
can be
used to determine the maximum grid current. Using the maximum grid current instead of the
maximum
fault current will reduce the overall cost of the ground grid system.

11.3.5 Use of the Design Equations

The design equations above are limited to a uniform soil resistivity, equal grid spacing, specific
buried
depths, and relatively simple geometric layouts of the grid system. It may be necessary to use
more
sophisticated computer techniques to design a substation ground grid system for nonuniform
soils or

complex geometric layouts. Commercially available computer programs can be used to optimize
the
layout and provide for unequal grid spacing and maximum grid current based on the actual
system
configuration, including overhead wires, neutral conductors, underground facilities, etc. Computer
programs
can also handle special problems associated with fences, interconnected substation grounding
systems at power plants, customer substations, and other unique situations.

11.3.6 Selection of Conductors

11.3.6.1 Materials
Each element of the grounding system, including grid conductors, connections, connecting leads,
and
all primary electrodes, should be designed so that for the expected design life of the installation,
the
element will:
Have sufficient conductivity, so that it will not contribute substantially to local voltage
differences
Resist fusing and mechanical deterioration under the most adverse combination of a fault
current
magnitude and duration
Be mechanically reliable and rugged to a high degree
Be able to maintain its function even when exposed to corrosion or physical abuse
Copper is a common material used for grounding. Copper conductors, in addition to their high
conductivity,
have the advantage of being resistant to most underground corrosion because copper is cathodic
with
respect to most other metals that are likely to be buried in the vicinity. Copper-clad steel is
usually used for
underground rods and occasionally for grid conductors, especially where theft is a problem. Use
of copper,
or to a lesser degree copper-clad steel, therefore assures that the integrity of an underground
network will
be maintained for years, so long as the conductors are of an adequate size and not damaged and
the soil
conditions are not corrosive to the material used. Aluminum is used for ground grids less
frequently. Though
at first glance the use of aluminum would be a natural choice for GIS equipment with enclosures
made of
aluminum or aluminum alloys, there are several disadvantages to consider:
Aluminum can corrode in certain soils. The layer of corroded aluminum material is
nonconductive
for all practical grounding purposes.
Gradual corrosion caused by alternating currents can also be a problem under certain
conditions.

Substation Grounding 11-15

Thus, aluminum should be used only after full investigation of all circumstances, despite the fact
that,
like steel, it would alleviate the problem of contributing to the corrosion of other buried objects.
However,
it is anodic to many other metals, including steel and, if interconnected to one of these metals in
the
presence of an electrolyte, the aluminum will sacrifice itself to protect the other metal. If
aluminum is
used, the high-purity electric-conductor grades are recommended as being more suitable than
most
alloys. Steel can be used for ground grid conductors and rods. Of course, such a design requires
that

attention be paid to the corrosion of the steel. Use of a galvanized or corrosion-resistant steel, in
combination with cathodic protection, is typical for steel grounding systems.
A grid of copper or copper-clad steel forms a galvanic cell with buried steel structures, pipes, and
any
of the lead-based alloys that might be present in cable sheaths. This galvanic cell can hasten
corrosion
of the latter. Tinning the copper has been tried by some utilities because tinning reduces the cell
potential
with respect to steel and zinc by about 50% and practically eliminates this potential with respect
to lead
(tin being slightly sacrificial to lead). The disadvantage of using tinned copper conductor is that it
accelerates and concentrates the natural corrosion, caused by the chemicals in the soil, of the
copper in
any small bare area. Other often-used methods are:
Insulation of the sacrificial metal surfaces with a coating such as plastic tape, asphalt
compound,
or both.
Routing of buried metal elements so that any copper-based conductor will cross water pipe
lines
or similar objects made of other uncoated metals as nearly as possible at right angles, and then
applying an insulated coating to one metal or the other where they are in proximity. The insulated
coating is usually applied to the pipe.
Cathodic protection using sacrificial anodes or impressed current systems.
Use of nonmetallic pipes and conduit.
11.3.6.2 Conductor Sizing Factors
Conductor sizing factors include the symmetrical currents, asymmetrical currents, limitation of
temperatures
to values that will not cause harm to other equipment, mechanical reliability, exposure to
corrosive
environments, and future growth causing higher grounding-system currents. The following
provides
information concerning symmetrical and asymmetrical currents.
11.3.6.3 Symmetrical Currents
The short-time temperature rise in a ground conductor, or the required conductor size as a
function of
conductor current, can be obtained from Equations 11.34 and 11.35, which are taken from the
derivation
by Sverak [13]. These equations evaluate the ampacity of any conductor for which the material
constants
are known. Equations 11.34 and 11.35 are derived for symmetrical currents (with no dc offset).
(11.34)
where
I = rms current, kA
Amm
2 = conductor cross section, mm2
Tm = maximum allowable temperature, C
Ta = ambient temperature, C
Tr = reference temperature for material constants, C
0 = thermal coefficient of resistivity at 0C, 1/C
r = thermal coefficient of resistivity at reference temperature Tr , 1/C
r = resistivity of the ground conductor at reference temperature Tr , -cm
K0 = 1/0 or (1/r) Tr , C
tc = duration of current, sec
TCAP = thermal capacity per unit volume, J/(cm3C)
IA
TCAP
t
KT

mm K
crr
om
oa

10 4

ln

11-16 Electric Power Substations Engineering

Note that r and r are both to be found at the same reference temperature of Tr degrees Celsius.
If
the conductor size is given in kcmils (mm2 1.974 = kcmils), Equation 11.34 becomes
(11.35)
11.3.6.4 Asymmetrical Currents: Decrement Factor
In cases where accounting for a possible dc offset component in the fault current is desired, an
equivalent
value of the symmetrical current, IF , representing the rms value of an asymmetrical current
integrated
over the entire fault duration, tc , can be determined as a function of X/R by using the decrement
factor
Df , Equation 11.35, prior to the application of Equation 11.34 and Equation 11.35.
(11.36)
(11.37)
The resulting value of IF is always larger than If because the decrement factor is based on a very
conservative assumption that the ac component does not decay with time but remains constant
at its
initial subtransient value.
The decrement factor is dependent on both the system X/R ratio at the fault location for a given
fault
type and the duration of the fault. The decrement factor is larger for higher X/R ratios and shorter
fault
durations. The effects of the dc offset are negligible if the X/R ratio is less than five and the
duration of
the fault is greater than 1 sec.

11.3.7 Selection of Connections

All connections made in a grounding network above and below ground should be evaluated to
meet the
same general requirements of the conductor used, namely electrical conductivity, corrosion
resistance,
current-carrying capacity, and mechanical strength. These connections should be massive
enough to
maintain a temperature rise below that of the conductor and to withstand the effect of heating,
be strong
enough to withstand the mechanical forces caused by the electromagnetic forces of maximum
expected
fault currents, and be able to resist corrosion for the intended life of the installation.
IEEE Std. 837, Qualifying Permanent Connections Used in Substation Grounding [14], provides

detailed information on the application and testing of permanent connections for use in
substation
grounding. Grounding connections that pass IEEE Std. 837 for a particular conductor size range
and
material should satisfy all the criteria outlined above for that same conductor size, range, and
material.

11.3.8 Grounding of Substation Fence

Fence grounding is of major importance, since the fence is usually accessible to the general
public, children
and adults. The substation grounding system design should be such that the touch potential on
the fence
is within the calculated tolerable limit of touch potential. Step potential is usually not a concern at
the
fence perimeter, but this should be checked to verify that a problem does not exist. There are
various
ways to ground the substation fence. The fence can be within and attached to the ground grid,
outside
and attached to the ground grid, outside and not attached to the ground grid, or separately
grounded
such as through the fence post. IEEE Std. 80 provides a very detailed analysis of the different
grounding
situations. There are many safety considerations associated with the different fence-grounding
options.
IA
TCAP
t
KT
K T kcmil
crr
om
oa

5 07 103 . ln

I I D Fff
D
T
t
ef
a
f
t
T
f

11
2

Substation Grounding 11-17

11.3.9 Other Design Considerations

There are other elements of substation grounding system design that have not been discussed
here. These
elements include the refinement of the design, effects of directly buried pipes and cables, special
areas
of concern including control- and power-cable grounding, surge arrester grounding, transferred
potentials,
and installation considerations.

References

1. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, IEEE Guide for Safety in AC Substation
Grounding,
IEEE Std. 80-2000, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 2000.
2. Sverak, J.G., Simplified analysis of electrical gradients above a ground grid: part I how good
is
the present IEEE method? IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Systems, 103, 725, 1984.
3. Thapar, B., Gerez, V., and Kejriwal, H., Reduction factor for the ground resistance of the foot in
substation yards, IEEE Trans. Power Delivery, 9, 360368, 1994.
4. Dalziel, C.F. and Lee, W.R., Lethal electric currents, IEEE Spectrum, 4450, Feb. 1969.
5. Dalziel, C.F., Threshold 60-cycle fibrillating currents, AIEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst., 79, 667
673,
1960.
6. Dalziel, C.F. and Lee, R.W., Reevaluation of lethal electric currents, IEEE Trans. Ind. Gen. Applic.,
4, 467476, 1968.
7. Biegelmeier, U.G. and Lee, W.R., New considerations on the threshold of ventricular fibrillation
for AC shocks at 5060 Hz, Proc. IEEE, 127, 103110, 1980.
8. Thapar, B., Gerez, V., Balakrishnan, A., and Blank, D., Simplified equations for mesh and step
voltages in an AC substation, IEEE Trans. Power Delivery, 6, 601607, 1991.
9. Rdenberg, R., Basic considerations concerning systems, Electrotechnische Zeitschrift, 11 and
12,
1926.
10. Sunde, E.D., Earth Conduction Effects in Transmission Systems, Macmillan, New York, 1968.
11. Wenner, F., A method of measuring earth resistances, Rep. 258, Bull. Bur. Stand., 12, 469
482, 1916.
12. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, IEEE Guide for Measuring Earth Resistivity,
Ground Impedance, and Earth Surface Potentials of a Ground System, IEEE Std. 81-1983, IEEE,
Piscataway, NJ, 1983.
13. Sverak, J.G., Sizing of ground conductors against fusing, IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst., 100,
5159,
1981.
14. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, IEEE Standard for Qualifying Permanent
Connections
Used in Substation Grounding, IEEE Std. 837-1989 (reaffirmed 1996), IEEE, Piscataway,
NJ, 1996.