1753 Hvac R WP High Pressure Control
1753 Hvac R WP High Pressure Control
1753 Hvac R WP High Pressure Control
equipment :
Summary
Executive summary
Introduction
II
High Pressure
HP control modes
Generic application
Conclusion
Executive summary
Introduction
HP control is a paradoxical solution for energy saving. It might be the best
known among energy saving solution, but it is unknown in its operation
constraints and limits.
Technological implementation of HP control is relatively easy. However
adjustments and adaptation of the installation to maximize energy savings
are more critical and are seldom implemented. Some HP control installed on
refrigerating units does not generate any energy savings, because they are
poorly adjusted or not adjusted at all. Others lead to technical problems and,
instead of solving these problems, they were abandoned.
This white paper overviews the components of a commercial refrigeration
system participating in the HP flow control. An explanation is given on the
HP and by what means it is regulated.
Traditional HP regulation is presented, then the HP control. Physical
implementation will be discussed.
Reasons why HP control creates energy savings are explained and illustrated
by two examples.
In a little more technical annex we will explain malfunctions which may occur
due to improper implementation of HP control.
II
Condenser
Compressor
Expansion
Evaporator
Compressors
The compressor is the heart of the circuit,
as it compresses the gas generating the
flow necessary for the cycle. Generally the
compressor consumes the major portion of
the energy. Its consumption is not constant
and depends on several variables, most
important are the low and high pressures. Some
compressors are equipped with a mechanical
device to reduce cooling capacity. The use of
these partial load devices affects the compressor
efficiency.
In terms of energy consumption, the most useful
is the COP (Coefficient Of Performance). The
COP takes into account variation of internal
compressor efficiencies and the refrigeration
cycle status. It is therefore necessary to have the
operating status associated with the COP to be
able to judge. (Example: -10 C / +35 C).
COP is the ratio of the cooling capacity produced
(or useful) to the consumed electrical power. The
COP operates in the same direction as efficiency.
There are several types of the compressors,
most representative are:
@@recriprocating compressors,
@@scroll compressors,
@@screw compressors.
The following explanation is applicable to these 3
types of compressors.
Condensers
- evaporative condensers,
- adiabatic condensers,
- hybrid condensers.
@@Water-cooled condensers
High pressure
cooling capability
HP balance
Text = HP
High Pressure
cooling capability
Text = HP
High Pressure
HP control modes
The implementation of the HP modes is not identical with all condensers. It is understandable that
the control is not implemented or controlled in the same way with a dry condenser or a cooling tower.
However, the methods described below are applicable with some modifications.
High Pressure
Fig.4 HP variation according to the number of fans
HP control
Reducing HP is interesting in terms of energy consumption: when HP decreases the compressor COP
increases, and vice versa. Figure 5 shows the COP as a function of the condensation temperature for
a screw compressor, COP variation is clearly visible. In the example, it jumps from 1.9 at -10 C / +50
C to 4.7 at -10 C / +20 C i.e. a variation of 62%.
7
6
Compressor COP
5
4
3
2
LP=0C
LP=5C
20
25
30
35
LP=-10C
40
45
50
Figure 6 gives the percentage gain (or loss) on COP for variations of one degree of condensation
temperature (given in Kelvin) according to the HP and for various evaporation temperatures. All
compressors do not react the same way, it is therefore necessary to use the characteristics of the
actual compressors to correctly assess the energy savings.
4.5%
4.0%
3.5%
3.0%
2.5%
LP=5C
LP=0C
LP=-10C
2.0%
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
HP control modes
However, to reduce HP, it is mandatory to
operate more fans. Energy savings is thus less
than those calculated for the compressor.
It is necessary to calculate the COP on the
compressor and condenser as a whole to specify
HP control.
Optimum
T
Refrigerate
piping
HP at 40C
HP control
Saving
300kW
300kW
40C
40C
129kW
129kW
22kW
22kW
151kW
151kW
HP value
Total power
0%
240kW
240kW
40C
25C
103kW
62kW
7kW
15kW
110kW
77kW
30%
Generic application
This example will help to show the impact of two factors - the outside
temperature and the load of the installation - which influences the performance
of installation and those of the HP control.
This nstallation, produces 500 kW of cold when running at its maximum
speed, i.e. a Low Pressure (LP) at -10 C and a HP at 50 C. Compressors
have a COP rated 3.4 at -10 / +30 C. The condenser ventilation power is 40
kW; which dissipates 685 kW with a differential of 10 C. The minimum HP
temperature is limited to 20 C for technical constraints.
280
260
240
220
200
180
160
140
120
100
Tout =30C
5
Tout =20C
9
10
Tout =10C
11
12
13
14
15
120
110
Temperature differential
for optimum HP
100
90
Overco
nsump
80
Saving
tion
70
60
50
40
Tout =30C
5
Tout =20C
8
10
Tout =10C
11
12
13
14
15
Conclusion
In todays climate, energy saving solutions are a must. Environmental aspect is sometimes not sufficient
to justify the huge required investments. Solutions as HP control have the benefit of reducing the
environmental impact not to mention the financial aspect.
HP control remains an effective and current solution for energy savings. There may be differences
between solutions and their implementations..
To improve the return on investment, good commissioning must not be forgotten.
This solution, according to the installations, is not very expensive; however it can have very significant
energy savings, exceeding 30%. HP control is the solution with the best return on investment for
refrigeration.
Today, all new installations must have an effective HP control.
Schneider Electric SA