Irp 3.3 Completions & Well Servicing
Irp 3.3 Completions & Well Servicing
Irp 3.3 Completions & Well Servicing
Note to Reviewers:
This is third chapter of six in IRP 3.
This is the second industry review for this chapter. Modifications based on comments from
the first industry review have been incorporated in consultation with the original
Completions and Well Servicing Working Group.
Modifications are noted as follows:
TABLE OF CONTENTS
3.3. Completions & Well Servicing ................................................... 5
3.3.1
Introduction ......................................................................5
3.3.2
3.3.3
3.3.4
3|Page
3.3.3.1
3.3.3.2
3.3.3.3
3.3.3.4
3.3.3.5
May
2012
Draft
3.3.5
3.3.6
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Deformation Classifications ................................................................. 24
Table 2. Wall Loss Classes ............................................................................... 25
4|Page
May
2012
Draft
3.3.
3.3.1 INTRODUCTION
Completions and well servicing reviews concerns specific to in situ heavy oil
operations and includes those situations common to the heavy oil industry with a
primary focus on worker safety.
The content presented here is intended for production engineers, completions
superintendents, wellsite supervisors, and those in planning from an integrated
approach.
This chapter emphasizes key regulations in several REG statements. IRP statements
are phrased with both shall and should throughout the chapter. Appendices A
and B illustrate spacing diagrams that are also provided in a larger format for
reproduction in the Doghouse package available on the IRP 3 landing page.
Central topics covered in completions and well servicing include:
Coiled tubing
Wireline
Snubbing units
Flush-by units
3.3.1.1
Definitions
5|Page
May
2012
Draft
6|Page
May
2012
Draft
IRP
3.3.3.1
Offset production
IRP
BHP,
7|Page
May
2012
Draft
A thorough individual well history is important to assess the potential for well
servicing problems. Well history data gathering should consider, but not be limited
to, the following:
3.3.3.2
Review BHP casing, wellhead, sand content, fluid viscosity, fluid density,
and regulatory requirements.
Ensure wellhead design includes full bore access and tool access to casing
weights.
Ensure communication and synergy with drilling for conditions and final
design of the well (e.g., cement, deviations, doglegs, trouble spots, etc.)
Refer to 3.1.2 Operational Integrity.
Design well pads and patterns to maximize service and completion work.
Design well pads and patterns that efficiently accommodate service and
completion work (see 3.1.1.2 Multi-Operational Pad Planning).
REG
REG
8|Page
May
2012
Draft
above require written approval from the Ministry of Energy & Resources
Regional office to have surface casing bowls removed.
To prepare a well for primary production, it is important to follow established
procedures during wellhead installation. For in situ heavy oil operations, conduct
wellhead installation procedures with particular attention to:
back welding,
pressure testing,
IRP
3.3.3.3
REG
9|Page
May
2012
Draft
3.3.3.4
All primary BOP configurations are considered Class IIA in accordance with ID 91-3
Heavy Oil/Oil Sands Operations. 1 Class IIA Primary refers to a well having a
sandface reservoir pressure equal to or less than the hydrostatic pressure that would
be exerted at the sandface if the well were filled with formation fluids.
REG
Since ID 91-03 was originally published in 1991, it refers to Class IIA. All current ERCB documentation
now has dropped the A and refers to Class II only.
10 | P a g e
May
2012
Draft
REG
Determine operations to be carried out (e.g., coil tubing [see IRP Vol. 21 Coiled Tubing Operations], wireline, continuous rod, flush-by operations,
etc.).
Ensure appropriate cutters are on the floor for capillary tubes and Electric
Submersible Pump (ESP) power cables.
Tubing strings too small for the existing pipe ram size(s) may be pulled
either with an annular BOP and variable type ram, or alternatively an
annular BOP and rod ratigans.
3.3.3.5
REG
11 | P a g e
May
2012
Draft
REG
REG
c. Foaming
Operators may choose to foam for cleanout. The IRP 3 Committee acknowledges
there are other cleanout methods as effective as foaming. The IRP 3 Committee
does NOT endorse, or recommend, any single method of cleanout. Cleanout
methods are selected at the Operators discretion.
If an Operator does choose to foam, it is recommended to foam with a Regulator
approved stable foam blend and follow Operator approved procedures. For
information regarding foaming considerations see the supporting document Foam
Cleanouts for guidelines pertaining to foaming.
d. Swabbing
Always swab as directed in Operator approved procedures.
REG
REG
3.3.3.6
Primary production can cause casing damage or failures to occur in the region of the
producing zone. A casing inspection program should be developed as required.
The following topics are relevant to in situ heavy oil wellbore inspections.
a. Wellbore Condition
The wellbore or casing condition inspections may seek to identify issues with
corrosion, ovality, wear, etc. Inspections may include, but not be limited to, the
following:
12 | P a g e
May
2012
Draft
pressure tests
REG
c. Remedial Cementing
Efforts should be made at the planning stages to avoid the necessity of remedial
cementing (see 3.1.2.1.1 Cement Integrity). Remedial cementing may be required:
depending on gas migration and/or vent flow test results and jurisdiction,
REG
REG
13 | P a g e
May
2012
Draft
3.3.4.1
Offset Production
Additionally the DRAFT Guidelines for Drilling Proximal to a SAGD Steam Chamber 3
is an excellent resource.
A thorough individual well history is important to assess the potential for well
servicing problems. Well history data gathering should consider, but not be limited
to, the items listed below.
drilling history of the well, noting any problems encountered while drilling
(particularly cementing problems)
Secondary well servicing should consider additional offset data including, but not
limited to, the following items listed below.
data on producing temperature, BHP, H2S content, gas to oil ratios, casing
problems, and sand issues
14 | P a g e
May
2012
Draft
current status of wells (e.g., producing, steaming, or shut in) and possible
effects that change of status could have on individual wells
Communication with other wells can cause significant impact is especially important
for secondary recovery (see 3.1.1.2.2 Offset Wells and Proximal Operations and
3.5.3.10 Managing Proximal Operations). Secondary well servicing should consider,
but not be limited to the following:
3.3.4.2
REG
Define potential H2S and CO2 concentrations (see 3.1.2.3 Surface Casing
Vent Flow and Gas Migration).
Ensure communication and synergy with drilling for conditions and final
design of the well (e.g., cement, deviations, doglegs, trouble spots, etc.).
(see 3.1.2 Operational Integrity)
Design well pads and patterns that efficiently accommodate service and
completion work (see 3.1.1.2 Multi-Operational Pad Planning).
Well completion design must accommodate a surface casing
vent (SCV) assembly in accordance with jurisdictional
regulations.
15 | P a g e
May
2012
Draft
back welding
stress-relieving
non-destructive testing
pressure testing
IRP
REG
REG
In Saskatchewan, a cement bond log may be required on a caseby-case basis. Contact the appropriate regional office.
b. Temperature
Temperature cycling in secondary recovery requires special consideration during
secondary planning.
IRP
IRP
c. Wellbore Access
It is important to design the wellhead with the ability to accommodate access to any
production or working string being serviced for the purpose of well control.
Offset access for tubular and workover strings is important for workers to effectively
and safely complete the well. Wellbore access should:
16 | P a g e
May
2012
Draft
d. Liners
It is recommended to design liner hangers to allow easy entry to RIH (run in hole)
with tools and downhole equipment (see 3.2.1.3.6 Thermal Liner). If required,
pressure test liner hanger during initial completion. During completion/workover
ensure pressure and weight does not exceed hanger specifications.
e. Packers
During completion design, consider expansion and contraction caused by BHT
change that may occur during operations and which may impact packers.
Additionally, consider placing debris seals over packers to keep slip and setting
action free of materials that could cause packers to become stuck.
f.
g. Observation Wells
Install wellheads suitable to reservoir conditions on observation wellbores. In
addition consider the following:
Note.
17 | P a g e
May
2012
Draft
3.3.4.3
evaluate the need for heavy kill procedures and develop procedures as
required; and
18 | P a g e
May
2012
Draft
3.3.4.4
All secondary BOP configurations are considered Class IIA in accordance with ID 913: Heavy Oil/Oil Sands Operations. Class IIA secondary wells have the following
characteristics due to fluid(s) injection (other than water) into the formation at
ambient temperatures:
sandface reservoir pressure greater than a Class IIA primary well or with a
bottomhole or injection pressure less than or equal to 21 MPa,
H2S release rate less than 0.001 m3/sec (see 3.1.2.3 Surface Casing Vent
Flow and Gas Migration),
includes all wells that are classified by the respective regulatory body as
an active EOR scheme and
any offset wells within 1000 m of a high pressure CSS well or within
300 m from any SAGD, fireflood, or solvent injection wellbore.
REG
REG
Ensure kill procedures and fluids consider the effects of thermal downhole
temperatures (see 3.2.2.7 Well Control Practices in Thermal Areas and
3.2.3.6 Drilling Proximal to a Steam Chamber).
19 | P a g e
May
2012
Draft
Non-routine well control procedures may be required, but not limited to,
the following circumstances:
o
if a well will not hold a column of fluid (i.e., will not circulate under
normal conditions)
Determine operations to be carried out (e.g., coil tubing [IRP Volume 21:
Coiled Tubing Operations], wireline, continuous rod, flush by operations,
etc.).
Strings too small for the existing pipe ram size may be pulled either with
an annular BOP that includes rams to accommodate each tubing string, or
a variable type ram.
a. Temperature
IRP
IRP
20 | P a g e
May
2012
Draft
c. Offset Spool
The use of offset rams is generally discouraged for tripping offset tubing strings.
An offset spool is recommended below a thermally suitable, dimensionally standard
BOP.
If multiple strings are to be handled, a back pressure valve should be available for
reconfiguring the BOP stack.
REG
d. Observation Well
Non-perforated observation wells do not require BOPs if the wellbore has been
pressure tested.
If BOPs are used, they should be installed as required for the offsetting production
wells.
e. Slant Wells
For wells slanted at surface, design consideration should ensure that loads induced
due to the moment arm and weight of the BOP will not cause a structural failure of
the near surface casing string(s) or leakage at the BOP or wellhead flanges. Support
brackets or other means of supporting the BOP stack should be designed by a
professional engineer.
3.3.4.5
21 | P a g e
May
2012
Draft
Note.
b. Temperatures
IRP
c. Stimulus Operations
REG
REG
REG
d. Foaming
Operators may choose to foam for cleanout. The IRP 3 Committee acknowledges
there are other cleanout methods as effective as foaming. The IRP 3 Committee
does NOT endorse, or recommend, any single method of cleanout. Cleanout
methods are selected at the Operators discretion.
If an Operator does choose to foam, it is recommended to foam with a Regulator
approved stable foam blend and follow Operator approved procedures. For
information regarding foaming considerations see supporting document Foam
Cleanouts for guidelines pertaining to foaming.
3.3.4.6
Secondary production techniques can increase the risk of casing damage and failure
due to thermally-induced stresses. A casing inspection program should be developed
as required.
The following topics describe wellbore inspection considerations.
a. Wellbore Condition
The wellbore or casing condition inspections may seek to identify issues with
corrosion, ovality, casing body and connections, wear, etc. Inspections may include,
but not be limited to the following
pressure tests
22 | P a g e
May
2012
Draft
cement bond quality (as per Directive 051: Injection and Disposal Wells
Well Classifications, Completions, Logging, and Testing Requirements)
temperature logs
Results of the casing inspection can identify wellbore conditions which may result in
one, or all, of the following constraints:
b. Deformation Classifications
Consider developing generic deformation classifications based on reduced ID.
Table 1 below is a guideline to develop deformation classifications.
23 | P a g e
May
2012
Draft
Deformation
Severity
Class
Amount of
Deformation
in
Connection
(mm)
Amount of
Deformation
in Pipe Body
(mm)
><3
<5
Ok to steam.
3-4
5-7
Ok to steam.
5-6
8-9
7-8
10-12
>8
>12
24 | P a g e
Standard
May
2012
Draft
Wall Loss
Class
% Wall
Loss
Standard
0-40
OK to steam.
41-50
51-70
71+
REG
REG
25 | P a g e
May
2012
Draft
f.
The potential for sulphide stress corrosion cracking and subsequent casing failure
due to the increase of H2S during production may occur. Refer to 3.2.1.3.3 Thermal
Production Casing Material Selection, b) Corrosion Considerations and c) Corrosion
Mitigations along with 3.5.3.3 Corrosion Mitigations and 3.5.3.4 Sand Management
and Erosion for more information.
g. Remedial Cementing
Remedial cementing in secondary applications is similar to primary applications in
the following circumstances:
REG
REG
26 | P a g e
May
2012
Draft
A larger version designed for 11x17 printing are available on the IRP 3 landing page
at:
http://enform.ca/publications/irps/heavyoilandoilsandsoperations.aspx
Note. Locate production POP tanks no closer than 7 m from well. Tanks must be
empty at all times and disconnected or locked out during well servicing operations.
REG
27 | P a g e
May
2012
Draft
28 | Page
5/6/2012 11:06 AM
29 | P a g e
May
2012
Draft
30 | Page
5/6/2012 11:06 AM