Introduction To Managed Services WP
Introduction To Managed Services WP
Introduction To Managed Services WP
Introduction
to Managed Services
A Publication of the CA Nimsoft MSP Center of Excellence
Table of Contents
Executive Summary
8
11
Executive Summary
The primary
benet MSPs
provide to the
customer is
third-party
monitoring and
maintenance,
which is designed
to prevent
unexpected
interruptions in
system availability
Today, the managed services business model presents a huge opportunity, one that enables valueadded resellers (VARs) and system integrators to offset shrinking margins on product sales, and to
address increased customer demand for outsourced IT services. However, end-user anxiety, reseller
uncertainty and lack of experience, and the tepid economic recovery are preventing solutions providers
from taking full advantage of the opportunity. Further, as technologies continue to evolve with
increasing rapidity, it can grow even more difficult for organizations to capitalize on the managed
services opportunity.
Figure A.
A key difference between a VAR and an MSP is that the VARs emphasis is on selling the system; the
MSPs emphasis is on selling the service needed to keep the system running once it is installed.
Customers are
wary about
entrusting
critical operations
to a third party,
especially since
its difficult to
vet a service
providers quality.
Comparing
todays computing
power, storage
capacity and
software
sophistication
to those early days
is like comparing
cosmonaut Yuri
Gargarins
108-minute
orbit of Earth
to the creation of
the International
Space Station.
The success of service arrangements, CompTIA found, was the specicity of the service level
agreements (SLAs) in place. The most critical SLA elements are response times, 24/7 support, and data
and systems security.
its almost impossible to comprehend that one event led eventually to the other. Just as the world of
space exploration has evolved from an individual rocket carrying one man into space for less than two
hours, the world of technology has developed into a universe of its own, demanding eets of experts to
not only maintain the systems but to exploit them to full advantage. Thats why companies need
managed services.
The following sections outline a few trends that are fueling increased demand for managed services.
Business complexity
The days when technology could be compartmentalized as a distinct function or department within a
business are over. Technology is a foundational layer of operations, regardless of the type of business.
Every business functionwhether billing, record-keeping, payroll or resource managementis
dependent on technology. Those are just the support systems. Revenue- generating activities are also
tied into technology. Most industries rely on increasingly complex dashboards, tracking a matrix of
business elements, such as manufacturing, inventory, shipping and sales. Productivity depends on
real-time capability to maintain precise reporting and coordination between those functions. Even a
minimal disruption in service results in operating losses.
Erosion
As technology evolves, technological relevance erodes. The half-life of todays new technology is
ever-shrinking. In other words, the IT system installed today loses value almost as quickly as a new car
driven off the sales lot. Technology morphs so quickly
that corporate IT departments are hard-pressed to keep up with the latest permutations, even as the
technologies grow more indispensable to daily business. This has become one of the many drivers for
cloud services.
Accessibility
At the same time that technology and business functions have become ever more enmeshed, modes
of access are rapidly evolving. Technology is no longer tethered to a deskor even a computer. Analyst
rm Gartner predicts that, by 2016, at least half of enterprise email users will rely primarily on
browser, tablet or mobile clients, rather than their desktops. At the same time, application
development projects for smartphones and tablets will outnumber PC projects by a ratio of four to one.
Mobility increases the demand for 24/7, worldwide accessibility and support services.
Look around the next time you exit an airplane. How many fellow passengers have pulled out their
smartphones to check their emails, respond to text messagesor merely check the time, because they
no longer wear a wristwatch? How many are uploading les created during their ve-hour cross-country
journey? In fact, with wireless Internet available on many airlines, how many were online and
collaborating with their peers while ying?
As always, youth is a leading indicator. Check with any university student. Most no longer use email,
barely know how to connect by telephone, and generally live by their smartphonesusing them for
morning alarms, directions to the hot band in town, downloading research, updating their Facebook
status, tweeting their locations and posting video to YouTube. They make a dozen phone calls in a
billing period, but rack up thousands of text messages or data downloads each month. This is not
merely a comment on youthful habits. Executives are only slightly less dependent on mobile
applications than todays adolescents and, on a larger scale, so are the companies that employ them.
Regulatory compliance
Even Vanna White, the letter-ipping star of TVs Wheel of Fortune, would shrink from the onslaught
of alphabet-and-acronyms soup that characterizes todays regulatory compliance atmosphere. HIPPA,
GLBA, PCI-DSS, SOX and the SEC, FOIA and FISMAit makes an IT staff just want to go AWOL.
When President George W. Bush signed the Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Act in 2002, he called it the most
far-reaching reform of American business practices since the time of Franklin D. Roosevelt. SOX
regulates corporate governance, nancial disclosure and public accounting practices, with hundreds
of highly specic rules covering every aspect of business that could possibly generate a transaction
or a record.
SOX is an IT nightmare. And SOX is just the king of the Gang of Three, a troika of laws requiring
stringent corporate record- keeping and reporting procedures. The other two are HIPAA (Health
Insurance Portability and Accountability Act), passed by Congress in 1996, and GLBA (Gramm-LeachBliley Act), passed in 1999. There are dozens of other laws governing the creation, storage and reporting
of computerized records. Research and drug development in the pharmaceutical industry, is regulated
by the FDA. The records of nancial transactions in the credit card industry are governed by the
Payment Card Industry (PCI).
The regulatory requirements are so sweeping, SMBs need sweeping solutions, including network, data
and device security; and protection from intrusion, theft or disclosure. These electronic records all need
to be analyzed, archived and made available for audit on an annual basis. Most companies do not have
the IT staff, tools or training to meet the data storage and security responsibilities these regulations
impose. Even if they could develop the expertise and hire appropriate staff, the costs are prohibitive
and disproportionately higher for small to medium businesses.
However, according to CompTIA, while many organizations need security solutions, fear of turning over
sensitive information to an outside entity makes many decision makers hesitant to outsource security
and reporting functions.
Financial considerations
Saving money is the number one reason customers turn to managed services, according to CompTIAs
2011 report, Trends in Managed Services. The next three reasons all relate to costs: freeing up staff
to focus on revenue-generating activities, gaining access to the newest technologies and improving
security. Hardware, maintenance, continual certication of staff for new technologies and compliance
mandates make keeping up with technological change incredibly expensive. These are all areas in
which a managed service contract can reduce the customers cost of doing business.
If you tie in those factors with the benets of cloud computing, which transforms technology from
a capital expenditure (CapEx) to an operating expense (OpEx), the benets are even larger. Computing
capacity is expanded, allowing the in-house IT department to concentrate on strategic projects.
Support functions are scaled as necessary through the MSP. The combination creates a perfect storm of
nancial benets.
The City of Asheville, N.C., for example, took bids on a document management program that saves
$100,000 over the cost of replacing its own, hardware-based system with something similar. The
outsourced program accommodates twice as many users and provides more than double the storage
capacity of the city-owned system. It will cost $12,000 a year more than maintenance of the existing
systembut it would take almost nine years for that expense to eat up the $100,000 in capital savings.
Half the respondents in CompTIAs 2011 survey reported saving between 1 and 24 percent in IT costs
annually with managed services; more than a third saved between 25 and 49 percent, and another 13
percent cut their IT costs by more than half. Ironically, one of the biggest obstacles keeping companies
from using managed services more heavily is confusion about how service agreements are priced.
Creating clear and detailed service agreements is one of the key challenges facing MSPs today.
In the short and mid-term, a mix richer in services yields net prots that average 15 percent, rather
than the 6 percent typical of a reseller with a 90 percent hardware/10 percent services mix.
Financing is easier to obtain for companies that can demonstrate recurring revenues.
Labor costs for MSPs are lower, as are long-term inventory costs.
Growth is more protable for MSPs, whose net income increases with growth, than it is for resellers,
whose net percentage is eroded by higher operating costs.
The average net income for a typical hardware focused reseller is 6 percent. Typically, that reseller
relies on big hardware sales plus installationswhich are sporadic. There are two problems with this
model: The prot margin on hardware is low and the expertise needed for installation is high, meaning
the reseller pays for technicians with multiple certications who may be idle in the intervals between
installations.
Compare that scenario to this one: The MSP with contracts that include monitoring, maintenance,
security, telephony, email hosting and help desk response is receiving regular monthly checks. It costs
less to deliver services than it costs to deliver equipment. Most of those services are not labor-intensive,
nor do they require highly skilled technicians. The MSPs net income average is 15 percent.
The monthly sums may be relatively low at rst, but they arrive on the rst of the month. Bankers love
recurring income. MSPs have less need for outside nancing (which eats into prots) but when nancing
is necessary, its easier to obtain. Plus, its hard to put a numeric value on the reduced stress level that
comes from nancial stability.
The MSP also has the advantage of continual interaction with the customer. When a problem comes up,
Who ya gonna call? Not the reseller who stops in every three to ve years to sell a new system. No,
the customer is going to call Jane at MSP, Inc., who they talk to on a regular basis as part of their
ongoing service relationship. Even if the problem isnt Janes problem, shes going to know how to
solve itor will call someone who can. When its time to upgrade, Jane has the customers ear.
Time to sell or retire?
As a well-run MSP, your company will be more attractive to potential buyers or merger partners. Thats
particularly true if you have a strong portfolio of recurring services contracts.
Private equity rms want to invest in companies with at least 6 percent net income and annual growth
of between 15 to 20 percent. MSPs are likely to have a higher net income and can afford the expenses
that go along with that growth rate. A hardware-centric business struggles with that growth rate,
becauseunlike a services businessexpenses rise when a reseller grows. In fact, growth often erodes
the resellers net income percentage.
Investors use a formula to determine a companys value. Taking into account various factors, they
come up with a multiplier based on the companys earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization (EBITDA). That EBITDA multiplier is applied to the companys net income to determine its
value. A strong services company benets on both sides of the formula: rst, its likely to have a higher
net income. And if it has a signicant amount of recurring contractsincome thats locked in for two to
three years, for examplethe EBITDA factor will be higher.
Heres a simplied example: Two companies have annual gross revenues of $5 million. The hardware
reseller nets $300,000 (6 percent). The MSP has a net of $750,000 (15 percent). The investor multiplies
the resellers income by a EBITDA factor of 4 (which is typical) and values the company at $1.2 million.
Because the MSP has a portfolio of recurring service contractswhich means lower operating costs and
higher protthe investor bumps the EBITDA factor up to 6. The value of the company is $4.5 million
more than triple the value of the reseller.
Figure B.
Conclusion
The ever-changing computing climate is both creating demand for managed services, as well as
anxiety for both resellers and their customers.
Factors inuencing customers desire for managed services include:
Increased complexity of the technology universe, including rapid development of new mobile devices
and applications that quickly erode the relevance of their current technology.
The desire to save money by transforming capital expenditures (CapEX) into operating expenses
(OpEx), which also provides more exibility for nimble system upgrades.
Federal laws and regulations with stringent record keeping and reporting requirements, which are
beyond the capacity of most in- house IT staff.
Concern over security from theft, intrusion or exposure of sensitive data, especially when so many
devices used to access the information are mobile.
A preference for putting in-house IT experts to work on revenue- producing functions, rather than
business-supporting functions.
Benets of the managed services model for resellers include:
The ability to compete in a market in which hardware is becoming less relevant than software
applications.
The ability to offer a product and services mix that sets them apart from the competition.
Higher prot margins and increased revenues, due to a richer mix of services and products. Lower
costs related to growth.
Easier availability of nancing; bankers love recurring services contracts.
The potential for higher value when its time to sell the company or merge.
Predictability and consistency of revenues, as well as better utilization of technicians time.
Factors holding back customers and/or resellers from creating managed services contracts include:
Fear of security breaches on the part of end users.
A wait-and-see attitude by both parties regarding developments, especially in cloud computing, that
might positively or negatively affect managed services agreements.
Anxiety or uncertainty by resellers about what the managed service business model is, what it might
cost to implement and whether they have the skills necessary to carry it off successfully.
For more information, please visit ca.com/nimsoft
11
Copyright 2012 CA. All Rights Reserved. One CA Plaza, Islandia, N.Y. 11749. Nimsoft is a trademark or registered trademark of CA. All other
trademarks, trade names, service marks, and logos referenced herein belong to their respective companies.
aCS2986_1112