Broadband Antennas and Traveling Wave
Broadband Antennas and Traveling Wave
Broadband Antennas and Traveling Wave
BROADBAND ANTENNAS
Veli YILDIRIM
2004513039
Broadband Antennas……………………………………………………………………..18
Helical Antenna ................................................................................................ 19
Normal(Broadside) mode .................................................................................................................. 21
Axial (end-fire) Mode ........................................................................................................................ 24
Design Procedure .......................................................................................................................... 25
Feed Design ................................................................................................................................... 28
1
Traveling Wave Antennas
Antennas with open-ended wires where the current must go to
zero (dipoles, monopoles, etc.) can be characterized as standing wave
antennas or resonant antennas. The current on these antennas can be
written as a sum of waves traveling in opposite directions (waves
which travel toward the end of the wire and are reflected in the
opposite direction). For example, the current on a dipole of length l is
given by
2
Traveling wave antennas are characterized by matched
terminations (not open circuits) so that the current is defined in terms
of waves traveling in only one direction (a complex exponential as
opposed to a sine or cosine). A traveling wave antenna can be formed
by a single wire transmission line (single wire over ground) which is
terminated with a matched load (no reflection). Typically, the length
of the transmission line is several wavelengths.
3
If the losses for the antenna are negligible (ohmic loss in the
conductors, loss due to imperfect ground, etc.), then the current can be
written as
4
5
Calculation of radiation resistance
The far fields in terms of the far field vector potential are
Given the far field of the traveling wave segment, we may determine
the time-average radiated power density according to the definition of
the Poynting vector such that
6
The total power radiated by the traveling wave segment is found
by integrating the Poynting vector.
7
The radiation resistance of the traveling wave antenna is much
more uniform than that seen in resonant antennas. Thus, the traveling
wave antenna is classified as a broadband antenna.
Pattern function of traveling wave segments
The pattern function of the traveling wave antenna segment is
given by
8
As the electrical length of the traveling wave segment increases,
the main beam becomes slightly sharper while the angle of the main
beam moves slightly toward the axis of the antenna.
Note that the pattern function of the traveling wave segment
always has a null at θ = 0 . Also note that with l >> λ, the sine
o
9
nulls) than the cotangent function. The approximate angle of the main
lobe for the traveling wave segment is found by determining the first
peak of the sine function in the normalized pattern function.
10
The maximum directivity can be approximated by
11
function of position. In either case, image theory may be employed to
determine the overall performance characteristics of the traveling
wave antenna.
12
13
Vee Traveling Wave Antenna
The main beam of a single electrically long wire guiding waves in
one direction (traveling wave segment) was found to be inclined at an
angle relative to the axis of the wire. Traveling wave antennas are
typically formed by multiple traveling wave segments. These traveling
wave segments can be oriented such that the main beams of the
component wires combine to enhance the directivity of the overall
antenna. A vee traveling wave antenna is formed by connecting two
matched traveling wave segments to the end of a transmission line
feed at an angle of 2θ relative to each other.
o
The beam angle of a traveling wave segment relative to the axis of the
wire (θmax) has been shown to be dependent on the length of the wire.
Given the length of the wires in the vee traveling wave antenna, the
angle 2θo may be chosen such that the main beams of the two tilted
wires combine to form an antenna with increased directivity over that
of a single wire.
14
A complete analysis which takes into account the spatial
separation effects of the antenna arms (the two wires are not co-
located) reveals that by choosing θo≈ 0.8 θmax, the total directivity of
the vee traveling wave antenna is approximately twice that of a single
conductor. Note that the overall pattern of the vee antenna is
essentially unidirectional given matched conductors.
If, on the other hand, the conductors of the vee traveling wave
antenna are resonant conductors (vee dipole antenna), there are
reflected waves which produce significant beams in the opposite
direction. Thus, traveling wave antennas, in general, have the
advantage of essentially unidirectional patterns when compared to the
patterns of most resonant antennas.
15
Rhombic Antenna
A rhombic antenna is formed by connecting two vee traveling
wave antennas at their open ends. The antenna feed is located at one
end of the rhombus and a matched termination is located at the
opposite end. As with all traveling wave antennas, we assume that the
reflections from the load are negligible. Typically, all four conductors
of the rhombic antenna are assumed to be the same length. Note that
the rhombic antenna is an example of a non-uniform transmission line.
16
To produce an single antenna main lobe along the axis of the
rhombic antenna, the individual conductors of the rhombic antenna
should be aligned such that the components lobes numbered 2, 3, 5
and 8 are aligned (accounting for spatial separation effects). Beam
pairs (1, 7) and (4,6) combine to form significant sidelobes but at a
level smaller than the main lobe.
17
Broadband Antennas
Wideband antennas refer to a category of antennas with a
relatively constant performance over a wide frequency band.
Historically, this referred to an octave or more. However, this is a
general statement as an antenna has several electrical parameters like
the input impedance, gain, polarization, sidelobe level, loss, and
aperture efficiencies. This is due to the fact that an antenna can have
very diverse applications and its desirable parameters can vary
significantly. Even the size of its bandwidth can depend on the
application and the term broadband can mean a different frequency
range for different applications. Similar difficulties can also be
experienced in considering a specific antenna type, where the
bandwidth can depend on the design goals. For instance, a microstrip
antenna can be narrowband in one design and wideband in another.
Thus the antenna bandwidth definition, and classification of antennas
using the bandwidth.
A helical antenna is a quasi-broadband antenna, since its
geometry is angular dependent, which is the main requirement for
frequency-independent antennas. However, it has a finite length that
limits its bandwidth.
It is shown that the antenna has two distinct parts. One part is its
input end, the first couple of turns, which acts as a transducer and
converts the input electrical power to radiated wave. For this reason,
this section is known as the launcher section. The remaining turns
act as the directors and guide the wave energy. As one might expect,
the launcher section primarily influences the antenna input parameters
and its impedance bandwidth. The director section mostly controls the
radiation characteristics. This knowledge facilitates the antenna design
and optimization. The rotational nature of the helix geometry can also
be used to generate multifilar helices, which offers additional benefits
in both input impedance and radiation characteristics. These antennas
are also discussed, and we show that they can be designed for better
performance or geometrical simplicity. The special case is the
quadrifilar helix design, which can provide diverse performance
ranges and thus is used in many applications. It is discussed only
briefly, as historically it was not a wideband antenna.
Yagi–Uda antenna is shown that its operation is very similar to
the helix antenna and can also be viewed as having two distinct parts,
18
the launcher and the director sections. Because this antenna does not
enjoy an angular geometrical character, its bandwidth is not high,
especially in high gain applications. The gain optimization further
reduces its effective bandwidth.
Helical Antennas
Helical antennas consist of a conducting wire wound into a helix.
Its cross section, or view from its axis, can be circular, elliptical,
square, or any other shape, but the circular helix is the most common
antenna type. Its concept was established experimentally by Kraus
who also developed empirical rules for its design, also described by
others. It is one of the most important circularly polarized antennas
and relatively easy to design or fabricate. In addition, the simple
geometry of the helix also makes it convenient for numerical
investigation and optimization. Consequently, it is extensively
investigated and practically utilized.
19
Ln= the total length of the wire
D= Diameter
A helix has an interesting geometry and in the limit can be a loop
antenna (for S = 0) or dipole antenna (for D = d). As such, it enjoys
their properties but avoids some of their limitations. A circular loop
has a rotational symmetry and can support infinite azimuthal modes.
However, because of its finite size, it is a resonant structure and has a
narrow impedance bandwidth for each mode. The helix, on the other
hand, has many turns N and the mode currents can run along its length
as they radiate. Thus it behaves more like a traveling-wave antenna
than a resonant one and is significantly more wideband. In fact, as will
be shown later, it can be designed to have almost constant input
impedance for its modes. Another difference between the two
antennas is due to the pitch angle or the spacing between turns of the
helix. Because of this axial length, the helix current has an axial
component and can radiate a wideband circularly polarized wave with
a single feed. In this respect, the helix behaves as a combination of
loop and dipole antennas, fed in phase quadrature. The
interrelationship between the circular and axial components of the
current also provides the ability for beam shaping. This property
becomes an important tool for designing multifilar helices with shaped
conical beams.
For a uniform helical antenna, the conducting wire is wound
over a cylinder of constant diameter and its current distribution has
both axial and circumferential components. Thus, in general, its
components can be written
20
can be related to the propagation constant along the helix wire by its
geometry. As is known in loop antennas, the nth azimuthal mode
resonates, when the circumference of the loop becomes about nλ,
where λ is the wavelength of the signal propagating through the helix
wire. In reality, the nth mode excites within a bandwidth around nλ,
the size of which depends on the antenna type. Since the loop antenna
is generally narrowband, the mode excitation is restricted to a small
frequency band around its resonance. These modes are well separated
from each other and provide appropriate modal radiation patterns and
characteristics. The situation, however, is different for a helical
antenna. Its bandwidth is wider, and adjacent modes can be excited
simultaneously, which will affect its performance, especially in
shaping its radiation pattern and causing large sidelobes.
In both loop and microstrip antennas, only the n = 1 mode
radiates axially. Other modes generate a boresight null. However, this
is not necessarily the case for helical antennas, as multifilar helices
can be used effectively to generate conical beams with the n = 1 mode,
with much smaller diameters. Since they are more compact and
simpler in design, they are preferred in communication applications,
especially in mobile communications. The geometry of the helix also
detrimentally affects the radiation beam of the higher order modes. Its
consecutive turns act as an endfire array and force the antenna beam
toward the axis, which counters the design goal of generating a
conical beam. Thus higher order modes of helix have not seen
widespread applications. The zero-order mode, known as the normal
mode, is different because it requires small helix dimensions in
wavelength and is an ideal antenna for circular polarization.
21
can be described interms of Eθ and Eφ components of the dipole and
loop, respectively.
In the normal mode, the helix can be simulated approximately by
N small loops and N short dipoles connected together in series
22
where D/2 is substituted for a. The ratio of the magnitudes of the Eθ
and Eφ components is defined here as the axial ratio (AR), and it is
given by
23
characteristics on its geometrical dimensions, which must be very
small compared to the wavelength, this mode of operation is very
narrow in bandwidth and its radiation efficiency is very small.
Practically this mode of operationis limited, and it is seldom utilized.
24
A monofilar helix, with mode index n = 1, radiates in the axial
direction, similar to other antennas supporting such a mode like a
loop, microstrip, or horn antenna. In its simplest form, it is a constant
diameter helix, having a circumference of about one wavelength,
C ≈ λ, wound in either right-hand or left-hand, similar to a screw.
When placed over a ground plane, it can be fed easily by a coaxial
input connector or microstrip line. An axial feeding maintains the
symmetry and can facilitate rotation, and microstrip feding can be
useful for impedance matching. In either case, the current induced on
the helix conductor radiates as it rotates and progresses along its
length, with the polarization being controlled by the direction of its
winding.
Design Procedure
The terminal impedance of a helix radiating in the axial mode is
nearly resistive with values between 100 and 200 ohms. Smaller
values, even near 50 ohms, can be obtained by properly designing the
feed. Empirical expressions, based on a large number of
25
measurements, have been derived, and they are used to determine a
number of parameters. The input impedance (purely resistive) is
obtained by
the directivity by
Where
26
All these relations are approximately valid provided 12◦ < α <
14◦, 3/4 < C/λ0 < 4/3, and N >3.
The cos θ term in represents the field pattern of a single turn, and
the last term in is the array factor of a uniform array of N elements.
The total field is obtained by multiplying the field from one turn with
the array factor (pattern multiplication ).
The value of p in is the ratio of the velocity with which the wave
travels along the helix wire to that in free space, and it is selected
according to for ordinary end-fire radiation or for Hansen-Woodyard
end-fire radiation. These are derived as follows.
For ordinary end-fire the relative phase ψ among the various turns of
the helix (elements of the array) is given by
27
Feed Design
The nominal impedance of a helical antenna operating in the
axial mode, computed using, is 100–200 ohms. However, many
practical transmission lines (such as a coax) have characteristic
impedance of about 50 ohms. In order to provide a beter match, the
input impedance of the helix must be reduced to near that value. There
may be a number of ways by which this can be accomplished. One
way to effectively control the input impedance of the helix is to
properly design the first 1/4 turn of the helix which is next to the feed.
To bring the input impedance of the helix from nearly 150 ohms
downto 50 ohms, the wire of the first 1/4 turnshould be flat in the
form of a strip and the transition into a helix should be very gradual.
This is accomplished by making the wire from the feed, at the
beginning of the formation of the helix, inthe form of a strip of width
w by flattening it and nearly touching the ground plane which is
covered with a dielectric slab of height
where
w = width of strip conductor of the helix starting at the feed
Ir = dielectric constant of the dielectric slab covering the ground plane
Z0 = characteristic impedance of the input transmission line
Typically the strip configuration of the helix transitions from the
strip to the regular circular wire and the designed pitch angle of the
helix very gradually within the first 1/4–1/2 turn.
This modification decreases the characteristic impedance of the
conductor-ground plane effective transmission line, and it provides a
lower impedance over a substantial but reduced bandwidth. For
example, a 50-ohm helix has a VSWR of less than 2:1 over a 40%
bandwidth compared to a 70% bandwidth for a 140-ohm helix. In
28
addition, the 50-ohm helix has a VSWR of less than 1.2:1 over a 12%
bandwidth as contrasted to a 20% bandwidth for one of 140 ohms.
A simple and effective way of increasing the thickness of the
conductor near the feed point will be to bond a thin metal strip to the
helix conductor. For example, a metal strip 70-mm wide was used to
provide a 50-ohm impedance in a helix whose conducting wire was
13-mm in diameter and it was operating at 230.77 MHz.
Yagi-Uda
History of Yagi-Uda
The original design and operating principles of this radiator were
first described inJapan ese inarticles published inthe Journal of I.E.E.
of Japan by S. Uda of the Tohoku Imperial University in Japan. In a
later, but more widely circulated and read article, one of Professor
Uda’s colleagues, H. Yagi, described the operation of the same
radiator in English. This paper has been considered a classic, and it
was reprinted in1984 inits original form inthe Proceedings of the
IEEE, as part of IEEE’s centennial celebration. Despite the fact that
Yagi in his English written paper acknowledged the work of Professor
Uda on beam radiators at a wavelength of 4.4 m, it became customary
throughout the world to refer to this radiator as a Yagi antenna, a
generic term in the antenna dictionary. However, in order for the name
29
to reflect more appropriately the contributions of both inventors, it
should be called a Yagi-Uda antenna, a name that will be adopted in
this book. Although the work of Uda and Yagi was done in the early
1920s and published in the middle 1920s, full acclaim in the United
States was not received until 1928 when Yagi visited the United States
and presented papers at meetings of the Institute of Radio Engineers
(IRE) in New York, Washington, and Hartford. In addition, his work
was published in the Proceedings of IRE, June 1928, where J. H.
Dellinger, Chief of Radio Division, Bureau of Standards, Washington,
D.C., and himself a pioneer of radio waves, characterized it as
“exceptionally fundamental” and wrote “I have never listened to a
paper that I felt so sure was destined to be a classic.”
In 1984, IEEE celebrated its centennial year (1884–1984).
Actually, IEEE was formed in 1963 when the IRE and AIEE united to
form IEEE. During 1984, the Proceedings of the IEEE republished
some classic papers, intheir original form, in the different areas of
electrical engineering that had appeared previously either in the
Proceeding of the IRE or IEEE. In antennas, the only paper that was
republished was that by Yagi. Not only that, in 1997, the Proceedings
of the IEEE republished for the second time the original paper by
Yagi. That in itself tells us something of the impact this particular
classic antenna design had on the electrical engineering profession.
Effects of Elements
Another very practical radiator in the HF (3–30 MHz), VHF
(30–300 MHz), and UHF (300–3,000 MHz) ranges is the Yagi-Uda
antenna. This antenna consists of a number of linear dipole elements,
one of which is energized directly by a feed transmission line while
the others act as parasitic radiators whose currents are induced by
mutual coupling. A common feed element for a Yagi-Uda antenna is
a folded dipole. This radiator is exclusively designed to operate as an
end-fire array, and it is accomplished by having the parasitic elements
in the forward beam act as directors while those inthe rear act as
reflectors. Yagi designated the row of directors as a “wave canal.” The
Yagi-Uda array has been widely used as a home TV antenna
30
All of the elements in the array were assumed to be driven with
some source. A Yagi-Uda array is an example of a parasitic array.
Any element in an array which is not connected to the source (in the
case of a transmitting antenna) or the receiver (in the case of a
receiving antenna) is defined as a parasitic element. A parasitic array
is any array which employs parasitic elements.
Driven element - usually a resonant dipole or folded dipole.
Reflector - slightly longer than the driven element so that it is
inductive (its current lags that of the driven element).
Director - slightly shorter than the driven element so that it is
capacitive (its current leads that of the driven element).
Yagi-Uda Array Advantages
_ Lightweight
_ Low cost
_ Simple construction
_ Unidirectional beam (front-to-back ratio)
_ Increased directivity over other simple wire antennas
_ Practical for use at HF (3-30 MHz), VHF (30-300 MHz), and
UHF (300 MHz - 3 GHz)
31
Typical Yagi-Uda Array Parameters
Driven element - half-wave resonant dipole or folded dipole,
(Length = 0.45λ to 0.49λ, dependent on radius), folded dipoles are
employed as driven elements to increase the array input impedance.
Director - Length = 0.4λ to 0.45λ (approximately 10 to 20 %
shorter than the driven element), not necessarily uniform.
Reflector - Length ≈ 0.5λ (approximately 5 to 10 % longer than
the driven element).
Director spacing - approximately 0.2 to 0.4λ, not necessarily
uniform.
Reflector spacing - 0.1 to 0.25λ
Since the length of each director is smaller than its
corresponding resonant length, the impedance of each is capacitive
and its current leads the induced emf. Similarly the impedances of the
reflectors is inductive and the phases of the currents lag those of the
induced emfs. The total phase of the currents in the directors and
reflectors is not determined solely by their lengths but also by their
spacing to the adjacent elements. Thus, properly spaced elements with
lengths slightly less than their corresponding resonant lengths (less
than λ/2) act as directors because they form anarray with currents
approximately equal in magnitude and with equal progressive phase
shifts which will reinforce the field of the energized element toward
the directors. Similarly, a properly spaced element with a length of λ/2
or slightly greater will act as a reflector. Thus a Yagi-Uda array may
be regarded as a structure supporting a traveling wave whose
performance is determined by the current distribution in each element
and the phase velocity of the traveling wave. It should be noted that
the previous discussion on the lengths of the directors, reflectors, and
driven elements is based on the first resonance. Higher resonances are
available near lengths of λ, 3λ/2, and so forth, but are seldom used.
The radiation characteristics that are usually of interest in a
Yagi-Uda antenna are the forward and backward gains, input
impedance, bandwidth, front-to-back ratio, and magnitude of minor
lobes. The lengths and diameters of the directors and reflectors, as
well as their respective spacings, determine the optimum
characteristics. For a number of years optimum designs were
accomplished experimentally. However, with the advent of high-speed
32
computers many different numerical techniques, based on analytical
formulations, have been utilized to derive the geometrical dimensions
of the array for optimum operational performance. Usually Yagi-Uda
arrays have low input impedance and relatively narrow bandwidth (on
the order of about 2%). Improvements in both can be achieved at the
expense of others (such as gain, magnitude of minor lobes, etc.).
Usually a compromise is made, and it depends on the particular
design. One way to increase the input impedance without affecting the
performance of other parameters is to use an impedance step-up
element as a feed (such as a two-element folded dipole with a step-up
ratio of about 4). Front-toback ratios of about 30 (≈15 dB) can be
achieved at wider than optimum element spacings, but they usually
are compromised somewhat to improve other desirable characteristics.
Optimization
The radiation characteristics of the array can be adjusted by
controlling the geometrical parameters of the array. for the 15-element
array using uniform lengths and making uniform variations in
spacings. However, these and other array characteristics can be
optimized by using nonuniform director lengths and spacings between
the directors. For example, the spacing between the directors can be
varied while holding the reflector–exciter spacing and the lengths of
all elements constant. Such a procedure was used by Cheng and Chen
to optimize the directivity of a six-element (four-director, reflector,
exciter) array using a perturbational technique. The results of the
initial and the optimized (perturbed) array are showninT able 10.1. For
the same array, they allowed all the spacings to vary while
maintaining constant all other parameters.
33
Another optimization procedure is to maintain the spacings
between all the elements constant and vary the lengths so as to
optimize the directivity.
34
antenna is typically 30–70 ohms the Gamma-match is the most
prudent matching technique to use. This has been widely used in
commercial designs where a clamp is usually employed to vary the
positionof the short to achieve a best match.
Gamma Match
35
Omega Match
T-Match
36
Design Procedure
The basis of the designis the data included in
1. Table 10.6 which represents optimized antenna parameters for
six different lengths and for a d/λ = 0.0085
2.Uncompansated director and reflector lengths for 0.001 ≤ d/λ ≤
0.04
3. compensation length increase for all the parasitic elements
(directors and reflectors) as a function of boom-to-wavelength ratio
0.001 ≤ D/λ ≤ 0.04
The specified information is usually the center frequency,
antenna directivity, d/λ and D/λ ratios, and it is required to find the
optimum parasitic element lengths (directors and reflectors). The
spacing between the directors is uniform but not the same for all
designs. However, there is only one reflector and its spacing is s =
0.2λ for all designs.
37
38
REFERENCES:
39