Ufc 3 201 01
Ufc 3 201 01
Ufc 3 201 01
1 June 2013
CIVIL ENGINEERING
UFC 3-201-01
1 June 2013
Date
Location
This UFC supersedes UFC 3-200-10N (Final Draft), dated July 2006, UFC 3-21001A, dated January 2004, UFC 3-210-02, dated January 2004, UFC 3-210-03A,
dated January 2004, UFC 3-210-06A, dated January 2006, UFC 3-230-17-FA, dated
January 2004 and UFC 3-250-18FA, dated January 2006.
UFC 3-201-01
1 June 2013
FOREWORD
The Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) system is prescribed by MIL-STD 3007 and provides
planning, design, construction, sustainment, restoration, and modernization criteria, and applies
to the Military Departments, the Defense Agencies, and the DoD Field Activities in accordance
with USD (AT&L) Memorandum dated 29 May 2002. UFC will be used for all DoD projects and
work for other customers where appropriate. All construction outside of the United States is
also governed by Status of Forces Agreements (SOFA), Host Nation Funded Construction
Agreements (HNFA), and in some instances, Bilateral Infrastructure Agreements (BIA.)
Therefore, the acquisition team must ensure compliance with the most stringent of the UFC, the
SOFA, the HNFA, and the BIA, as applicable.
UFC are living documents and will be periodically reviewed, updated, and made available to
users as part of the Services responsibility for providing technical criteria for military
construction. Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (HQUSACE), Naval Facilities
Engineering Command (NAVFAC), and Air Force Civil Engineer Center (AFCEC) are
responsible for administration of the UFC system. Defense agencies should contact the
preparing service for document interpretation and improvements. Technical content of UFC is
the responsibility of the cognizant DoD working group. Recommended changes with supporting
rationale should be sent to the respective service proponent office by the following electronic
form: Criteria Change Request. The form is also accessible from the Internet sites listed below.
UFC are effective upon issuance and are distributed only in electronic media from the following
source:
Whole Building Design Guide web site http://dod.wbdg.org/.
Hard copies of UFC printed from electronic media should be checked against the current
electronic version prior to use to ensure that they are current.
AUTHORIZED BY:
Chief Engineer
Naval Facilities Engineering Command
MICHAEL McANDREW
UFC 3-201-01
1 June 2013
UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA (UFC)
NEW REVISION SUMMARY SHEET
Document: UFC 3-201-01, Civil Engineering
Superseding: UFC 3-200-10N, UFC 3-210-01A, UFC 3-210-02, UFC 3-210-03A, UFC 3-21006A, UFC 3-230-17FA, and UFC 3-250-18FA.
Description: This new UFC 3-201-01 consolidates into one Tri-Service document the civil
engineering criteria applicable to site development, grading, storm drainage and pavements that
were formerly in the superseded documents. This UFC through succinct reference to industry
and government standards, codes and references makes possible the replacement and/or
consolidation of numerous criteria documents.
The complete list of civil engineering documents referenced in this UFC can be found in
Appendices A and B.
Reasons for Document:
The new UFC updates the guidance and requirements for site development, grading,
storm drainage and pavements contained in several existing civil engineering documents
and efficiently consolidates them into a single UFC.
The superseded UFC documents included requirements that were not consistent with
industry standards or utilized different industry standards.
Impact:
This unification effort will result in the more effective use of DoD funds, in the following ways:
By significantly improving the design process for DoD projects and facilities, through a
more efficient application of facilities criteria and enabling more efficient maintenance of
facilities criteria.
The consolidation of the UFC 3-201-01 will positively impact the project costs incurred,
as a result of the following direct benefits:
o
Reduction in the number of civil references used for military construction provides
more clear and efficient guidance for the design and construction of DoD facilities.
Reduction in ambiguity and the need for interpretation reduces the potential for
design and construction conflicts.
The reduction in the number of documents and the use of industry standards
improves the ease of updating and revising this reference document as better
information becomes available.
For design of drainage systems for apron pavements, use a minimum 2 year storm
frequency for Army and Air Force projects and use a minimum 5 year storm frequency
for Navy projects.
UFC 3-201-01
1 June 2013
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................... 1
1-1
1-2
APPLICABILITY. ....................................................................................... 1
1-3
1-3.1
1-3.2
1-3.3
1-4
REFERENCES. ......................................................................................... 2
1-5
BEST PRACTICES.................................................................................... 2
2-2
EXISTING CONDITIONS........................................................................... 3
2-2.1
2-2.2
Surveying. .............................................................................................. 3
2-2.2.1
2-3
2-4
2-5
SITE DEVELOPMENT............................................................................... 4
2-5.1
2-5.2
2-5.2.1
2-5.2.2
2-5.2.3
Design Traffic......................................................................................... 6
2-5.2.4
2-5.2.4.1
2-5.2.5
2-5.2.5.1
2-5.2.5.2
2-5.2.5.3
2-5.2.5.4
2-5.3
UFC 3-201-01
1 June 2013
2-5.4
2-5.4.1
2-6
SITE APPURTENANCES.......................................................................... 8
2-6.1
2-6.2
2-6.3
Wheelstops. ........................................................................................... 9
2-6.4
Bollards. ................................................................................................. 9
2-6.4.1
2-6.4.2
2-6.5
2-6.6
2-7
UTILITIES. ............................................................................................... 10
2-7.1
2-7.2
2-7.3
2-8
LIGHTING................................................................................................ 10
2-9
LANDSCAPE. ......................................................................................... 10
3-1.1
3-1.2
3-2
3-3
3-3.1
Grading. ............................................................................................... 12
3-3.2
3-4
3-4.1
3-4.2
3-4.3
3-4.4
3-4.5
3-4.6
3-4.7
UFC 3-201-01
1 June 2013
3-5
3-6
3-6.1
3-7
3-8
3-9
3-9.1
3-9.2
3-9.2.1
Grading. ............................................................................................... 18
3-9.2.2
3-9.2.3
3-9.3
3-9.3.1
3-9.3.2
3-9.3.3
3-9.4
Safety .................................................................................................. 19
4-1.1
Frost Conditions................................................................................... 21
4-1.2
4-1.3
4-1.3.1
4-1.4
Rigid Pavements.................................................................................. 21
4-1.4.1
4-1.4.1.1
4-1.4.2
Joints. .................................................................................................. 22
4-1.5
4-1.6
4-2
UFC 3-201-01
1 June 2013
B-2
B-2.1
B-2.2
B-2.2.1
B-2.2.2
B-2.2.3
B-2.2.4
B-2.2.5
Buffers ................................................................................................. 30
B-2.2.6
B-2.2.7
B-2.2.8
Dumpsters. .......................................................................................... 31
B-2.2.9
B-2.3
B-3
iv
UFC 3-201-01
1 June 2013
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
1-1
This UFC provides civil engineering requirements for all new and renovated
government-owned facilities for the Department of Defense (DoD). Where other criteria,
statutory or regulatory requirements are referenced in the contract, the more stringent
requirement must be met.
1-2
APPLICABILITY.
This UFC applies to all service elements and contractors involved in the planning,
design and construction of DoD facilities worldwide. It is applicable to all methods of
project delivery and levels of construction, but is not applicable to public-private
ventures (PPV). All design and construction outside of the United States and United
States territories is governed by international agreements, such as the Status of Forces
Agreements (SOFA), Host Nation-Funded Construction Agreements (HNFA), and in
some instances, Bilateral Infrastructure Agreements (BIA), and country-specific Final
Environmental Governing Standards (FGS) or the DoD Overseas Environmental
Baseline Guidance Document (OEBGD), DoD 4715.05-G. The OEBGD applies when
there are no FGS in place. Therefore, in foreign countries this UFC will be used for
DoD projects to the extent that it is allowed by and does not conflict with the applicable
international agreements and the applicable FGS or OEBGD.
This UFC assumes that appropriate National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) action
has been accomplished prior to committing resources to any proposed activity.
1-3
OTHER CRITERIA.
1-3.1
Use UFC 3-210-10 for LID criteria. UFC 3-210-10 was developed to meet the
requirements of Section 438 of the Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA).
1-3.3
UFC 4-020-01 supports the planning of DoD facilities that include requirements for
security and antiterrorism. Use UFC 4-020-01 in conjunction with UFC 4-010-01 to
establish the security and antiterrorism design criteria that will be the basis for DoD
facility designs. All DoD facilities must also comply with Geographic Combatant
Commander antiterrorism construction standards for antiterrorism requirements.
1
UFC 3-201-01
1 June 2013
1-4
REFERENCES.
Appendix A contains the list of references used in this document. The publications,
standards, and technical data referenced herein form a part of these criteria to the
extent referenced.
1-5
BEST PRACTICES.
UFC 3-201-01
1 June 2013
CHAPTER 2 SITE DEVELOPMENT
2-1
Use UFC 2-100-01 to develop a preliminary approach appropriate to the site and
adjacent facilities and integrates sustainable strategies, utilizing a holistic design
approach. Conduct a preliminary site visit and obtain photographs of the site.
Research and obtain Installations master plan, utility maps and as-built record drawings
for information related to topography, utility and storm drainage availability, including
design approaches used in the project vicinity. Evaluate the potential for abandoned or
unmapped utilities. Research and review available subsurface investigation data and
reports in order to evaluate subsurface conditions. Identify flood hazard areas in
accordance with the IBC Section 1612, Flood Loads. Research and obtain explosive
safety requirements. Consult with the Government Project Manager to establish contact
with the Installations Environmental personnel to determine if the site has
environmental concerns, such as radon, pesticides, or known contamination. If
required, provide radon mitigation system design in accordance with UFC 3-101-01.
Evaluate the need for additional analysis based on project requirements and site
conditions.
Conduct detailed consultations with the Government in order to clearly define
requirements and preferences.
2-2
EXISTING CONDITIONS.
2-2.1
Surveying.
UFC 3-201-01
1 June 2013
Consult with the Government Project Manager to establish contact with the Installations
real estate personnel prior to entering property not owned by the Government. Notify
and obtain authorization from all public and private landowners for a right of entry and
trespass, over, across and through all lands necessary to perform required field survey
work. Coordinate with the Installations Security section for approval to enter controlled
or restricted areas (e.g. airfield, ranges, munition storage, etc.). Consult with
Government Project Manager to establish contact with the Installations Environmental
personnel before entering the area with regards to any restrictions concerning
vegetation cutting/clearing, natural resources, endangered species, etc.
2-2.2.1
Topographic Surveys.
Provide a topographic survey of the project site in accordance with each services
requirements as well as the requirements of the state or Host nation equivalent in which
the site is located. If state or Host nation equivalent requirements are not available, use
the National Society of Professional Surveyors (NSPS) Model Standards for
Topographic Surveys.
2-3
The DoR must identify, assist and provide, as applicable, all permits, approvals and
fees required for the design and construction of the proposed project from federal, state
and local regulatory authorities or overseas equivalent. The Civil Engineering DoR
must be a Professional Civil Engineer experienced and licensed; licensure in the state
where the project is located may be required to obtain permits and approvals. Seek out
the project NEPA documentation, as applicable, for project specific requirements. In
CONUS locations the Government will review for acceptability site improvement plans.
In OCONUS locations with Host nation agreements, follow design approval procedure
as directed in project scope and by the Government Project Manager. In OCONUS
locations without Host nation agreements, the Government will review and approve site
improvement plans.
Consult with the Government Project Manager to determine the appropriate signatories
for permit applications.
2-4
SITE DEVELOPMENT.
4
UFC 3-201-01
1 June 2013
Base location and orientation of DOD facilities on an analysis of activities to be
accommodated and on specific requirements for each project, to include all functional,
technical and economic factors. Use UFC 3-101-01 for building function, size and
orientation criteria
Incorporate the following into site design, as applicable:
a. Land Use (existing and future)
b. Circulation (vehicle and pedestrian)
c. Orientation and Location to integrate green space. Provide adequate grading
and drainage while preserving natural topographic features to minimize cut
and fill, impact on existing drainage patterns and tree removal.
d. Operational and natural constraints
1. Maintain mandated buffers:
(a) Airfield and helipad clearances.
(b) Explosives safety clearances.
(c) Noise abatement.
(d) Antiterrorism/physical security clearances.
(e) Storage and handling hazardous material clearances.
(f) Separation of incompatible land use or functions.
(g) Building setbacks (if established).
(h) Fire separation zones per building and fire codes.
2. Eliminate or minimize construction activities requiring permits, for areas
such as archaeological sites, wetlands, utilities, and stormwater
management.
3. Minimize site or utility maintenance and operating costs.
4. Accommodate site constructability and security requirements.
5. Minimize distance to existing utility connections.
2-5.1
Project sites located in flood hazard areas must be designed in accordance with IBC
1612. Ensure proper correlation between vertical datums.
5
UFC 3-201-01
1 June 2013
2-5.2
Vehicle Circulation.
For design of streets and parking for DoD facilities, the DoR must address unique
aspects of military facilities. For example, roads on military installations are typically
designed for lower speeds while addressing movement of specialized military vehicles.
Provide vehicle circulation and parking systems in accordance with Military Surface
Deployment and Distribution Command, Transportation Engineering Agencys
(SDDCTEAs) Pamphlet 55-17 Better Military Traffic Engineering, American Association
of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTOs) A Policy on Geometric
Design of Highways and Streets; and AASHTOs Roadside Design Guide. Design
streets and parking areas (i.e., site entrances and exits, service drives, parking lots and
other areas with special requirements (e.g., drive up drop off areas or loading docks)) to
accommodate the largest vehicle that will use the facility. The design must also
address the turning and reverse movements for the vehicles using the facility. Streets,
parking areas and structures must conform to current antiterrorism and handicap
accessibility requirements. Use Best Practices document, AASHTOs Guidelines for
Geometric Design of Very Low-Volume Local Roads (ADT 400) as applicable.
2-5.2.1
Traffic Studies.
Provide traffic studies and analysis in accordance with SDDCTEAs Pamphlet 55-17
which references SDDCTEAs Pamphlet 55-8, Traffic Engineering Study Reference.
2-5.2.2
Design Vehicles.
Design Traffic.
Single-lane streets may be provided for fire lanes and approach drives to buildings
within built-up areas. Access roads to unmanned facilities may also be single-lane
roads. Where shoulders are not sufficiently stable to permit all-weather use and the
6
UFC 3-201-01
1 June 2013
distance between intersections is greater than -mile (805 m), turnouts must be
provided at 1/4-mile (402 m) intervals along single lane roads for use by occasional
passing or meeting vehicles.
2-5.2.4.1
Fire lanes and emergency vehicle access must comply with UFC 3-600-01.
2-5.2.5
Parking Areas.
Parking areas include on-street parking, off-street parking lots, and parking structures.
Conform to existing topography to the greatest extent possible. Refer to scope of work
for total parking requirement of number of spaces. If the number of parking spaces is
not identified in the project scope of work, utilize Table B-1 in Appendix B to calculate
parking requirements. Provide parking spaces primarily by off-street parking areas or
structures. Design parking areas in accordance with SDDCTEA Pamphlet 55-17 Better
Military Traffic Engineering, Chapter 17.
The design must allow for all types of traffic that may be associated with the facility,
including deliveries, emergencies and garbage pick-up. However, the design must
discourage through traffic.
2-5.2.5.1
On-Street Parking.
The use of on-street parking is discouraged. On-street parking will not be allowed
within 20 feet (6.10 m) of an intersection. The minimum length for the first and last stall
is 18 feet (5.49 m). The minimum length for each interior stall is 22 feet (6.71 m).
Exception to SDDCTEA Pamphlet 55-17: The minimum width for all stalls is 8 feet (2.44
m).
2-5.2.5.2
Off-Street Parking.
Typically 90 degree parking is preferred for off-street parking for ease of traffic flow. If
90 degree parking is not used, the designer must be able to justify by showing that the
minimum functional and technical requirements are met while providing an economic
benefit to the Government. Provide minimum 9 feet (2.74 m) wide and 18.5 feet (5.64
m) long parking spaces for 90 degree parking.
Exception to SDDCTEA Pamphlet 55-17: In areas of limited space, provide a minimum
buffer strip of 8 feet (2.44 m).
2-5.2.5.3
Motorcycle Parking.
UFC 3-201-01
1 June 2013
Use UFC 3-460-01 for POL criteria.
2-5.3
Circulation areas for other than normal passenger car traffic have special requirements
to maintain traffic safety. These areas require additional space to accommodate
unusual traffic patterns and greater turning radii for maneuverability. Special circulation
areas include areas such as drop off areas, delivery and service zones, dumpsters,
drive-in facilities, emergency vehicle access, and entry control facilities.
2-5.4.1
Use UFC 4-022-01 and SDDCTEA Pamphlet 55-15, Traffic and Safety Engineering for
Better Entry Control Facilities for entry control facility criteria.
2-6
SITE APPURTENANCES.
Provide site appurtenances in accordance with State or local standards where project is
located.
2-6.1
Pedestrian Circulation.
UFC 3-201-01
1 June 2013
2-6.2
Use concrete curb and gutter when overland flow cannot be achieved; to extend
curb/curb and gutter from an adjacent facility; or to confine traffic. Asphalt-type curbs
are only allowed in remote areas where approved by the Installation.
2-6.3
Wheelstops.
Provide 6 feet (1.83 m) long wheelstops anchored to the pavement at parking spaces
adjacent to sidewalks, buildings, stormwater management facilities, areas of extreme
slope, and other areas without curb where a vehicle would likely cause property
damage. Locate the front face of the wheelstop 30 inches (762 mm) from the edge of
the pavement or sidewalk.
Where snow removal equipment is used, wheelstops may not be allowed by the
Installation; coordinate with Government Project Manager.
2-6.4
Bollards.
2-6.4.1
Provide bollards around any structures subject to damage from vehicular traffic by
incidental contact; such bollards must be at minimum 4 feet (1.22 m) high. For steel
bollards, provide minimum 4 inch (100 mm) diameter filled with concrete and painted.
Bollards on aircraft aprons protecting fire hydrants may not exceed 30 inches (762 mm)
aboveground and 24 inches (610 mm) above load bearing paving.
2-6.4.2
For vehicular barrier and crash rated applications, use UFC 4-022-02.
2-6.5
Provide signs and associated pavement markings to facilitate proper utilization of the
project site. Provide new traffic control devices (i.e. signs, markings, etc.) in
accordance with SDDCTEAs Pamphlet 55-17 Better Military Traffic Engineering and
Pamphlet 55-14, Traffic Engineering for Better Signs and Markings. Also use Federal
Highway Administrations (FHWAs) Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
(MUTCD) and Standard Highway Signs and Markings (SHSM).
Provide non-reflectorized pavement markings for paved parking areas, reflectorized
pavement markings for paved roads and streets, and fire access markings in
accordance with State DOT or local governing authoritys requirements.
2-6.6
Where dumpster pads are required in a project, provide a dumpster pad with an
enclosure conforming to the Installation Appearance Plan. For airfield projects locate
dumpsters in locations approved by Airfield Operations (AIROPS) to avoid a Bird/Animal
9
UFC 3-201-01
1 June 2013
Aircraft Strike Hazard (BASH) issue. Provide a concrete pavement pad to support and
accommodate the dumpster(s) and front wheels of the service truck.
2-7
UTILITIES.
Use UFC 3-301-01 for frost penetration criteria to determine cover over underground
utilities. Locate utilities to minimize connection costs. New underground utilities must
be at least 10 feet (3.05 m) from proposed structures, except for building connections.
Minimize underground utilities located beneath pavements, except where crossings are
required. Locate required crossings to minimize traffic interference with future
maintenance.
Obstructions including signs and poles for overhead utilities must be located outside the
limits of usable shoulder on roads designed without barrier curbs. Where practicable,
roads designed with barrier curbs must have the desirable lateral clearances to
obstructions as indicated in AASHTOs, A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and
Streets except that fire hydrant clearances must be in accordance with UFC 3-600-01.
2-7.1
Use UFC 3-230-01 for water distribution system criteria. Use UFC 3-230-03 to establish
water demand.
2-7.2
Use UFC 3-240-01 for wastewater collection system criteria. Use UFC 3-240-02 to
establish wastewater flows.
2-7.3
LIGHTING.
LANDSCAPE.
Use UFC 3-201-02 for landscape criteria. Coordinate building location and orientation,
vehicular and pedestrian circulation, parking, lighting, and utilities.
10
UFC 3-201-01
1 June 2013
CHAPTER 3 STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEMS
3-1
DESIGN CRITERIA.
Design Methods.
UFC 3-201-01
1 June 2013
For design of the drainage system, use a minimum 10-year storm frequency, the facility
type minimum, or the minimum required by the local governing authority, whichever is
more stringent. Maximum spread for DoD roads is driving lane using a minimum 5year storm frequency.
3-2
ROOF DRAINAGE.
3-3.1
Grading.
Use UFC 1-200-01 and the criteria in this UFC to determine the appropriate
requirements for site grading and accessibility. UFC 1-200-01 implements grading
requirements from the IBC and provides supplements to IBC criteria. Ensure that the
grading and associated stormwater runoff do not adversely affect surrounding sites.
Acceptable ranges of transverse and longitudinal slopes are indicated in Table 3-1.
Grading criteria is also indicated in AASHTOs A Policy on Geometric Design of
Highways and Streets.
12
UFC 3-201-01
1 June 2013
Table 3.1: Grading
Item
No.
1
Item Description
Requirement
Best Practices
Min. 0.3%
Min. 0.5%
Longitudinal grades of
roadways
Transverse grades of
roadways
Concrete pavement in
parking areas
Curb & Gutter
Valley Gutter
Bituminous pavement in
parking areas
Permeable Pavements in
parking areas*
Walks, Transverse
Walks, longitudinal
Concrete Landings
2
3
4
5
6
Min. 2.0%
Min. 1.0%
Min. 0.3%
Min. 1.5%
Min. 1.0%
Min. 1.5%
Max. 5.0%
Min. 0.5%
Min. 2.0%
Max. 5.0%
Max. 5.0%
Max. 2.0%
Max. 5.0%
Max. 2.0%
10
Design erosion and sediment controls that minimize the discharge of pollutants from
earth disturbing activities in conformance with the applicable requirements of the
regulatory agency with jurisdiction over the Installation regarding erosion and sediment
control. Where requirements do not exist, provide an erosion and sediment control plan
in accordance with the requirements of Environmental Protection Agencys (EPAs)
2003 Construction General Permit (which is also the referenced standard for LEED
Sustainable Site Prerequisite 1).
3-4
For drainage system design comply with the documents referenced in the paragraph
entitled, Design Criteria in Chapter 3, or the following criteria, whichever is more
stringent.
a. Provide straight alignments for piping between storm drainage structures.
Use of curvilinear alignment is not allowed for pipes with a diameter of 48
13
UFC 3-201-01
1 June 2013
inches (1200 mm) or less. For pipes with a diameter greater than 48 inches
(1200 mm) use of curvilinear alignment may be allowed with explicit
authorization by the Government. Deflection at structures must not be less
than 90 degrees for main line flows and not less than 60 degrees for
contributory flows, as measured from the centerline of the mainline discharge.
b. Storm drainage piping must not pass under buildings and must be a parallel
distance of at least 10 feet (3.05 m) from building foundations.
c. Avoid conflicts with other utilities.
d. Conflict structures will not be allowed without Government approval.
e. Comply with state or applicable regulatory agencys requirements for
separation distances between utilities and other public health and safety
issues.
f. Provide a structure at collection and inlet points, at changes in horizontal or
vertical alignment, at pipe junctions and with minimum spacing of a pipe run
according to Table 3-2. Provide a discharge structure wherever flow changes
from piped to open channel flow.
Table 3.2: Storm Structure Spacing Criteria
Pipe Diameter
Maximum Spacing
inches
mm
feet
meters
12 24
300 - 600
300
91.44
27 - 36
675 - 900
400
121.92
42 - 54
1050 - 1350
500
152.4
60 and up
1500 and up
1000
304.8
g. In the design of culverts and storm drains, consider headwater and tailwater
and their effects on hydraulic grade line and capacity. The following
upstream controls may limit the headwater elevation:
1. Not higher than an elevation that is 18 inches (450 mm) below the outer
edge of the shoulder at its lowest point in the grade.
2. Upstream property damage.
3. Elevations established to delineate National Flood Insurance Program or
other floodplain zoning.
4. HW/D is at least 1.0 and not to exceed 1.5 or the local requirement where
HW is the headwater depth from the culvert inlet invert and D is the height
of the barrel.
14
UFC 3-201-01
1 June 2013
5. Low point in the road grade which is not necessarily at the culvert location.
6. Elevation of terrain and ditches that will permit flow to divert around the
culvert.
The tailwater elevation in the storm drain outfall must be either the average of
the critical depth and the height of the storm drain conduit, (dc + D)/2, or the
mean high tide if tidal conditions are present, whichever is greater. Storm
drains must be designed for open channel flow. The hydraulic grade line for
the storm sewer system must not exceed the pipe crown elevation unless the
outfall is submerged. If the controlling tailwater elevation is above the crown
elevation of the outfall, the hydraulic grade line for the storm sewer system
must not exceed one foot (300 mm) above the crown, or one foot (300 mm)
below the structure rim or gutter flow line at inlets, whichever is the lower
elevation at each structure.
At structures, consider setting the inlet pipe crown elevation equal to or
greater than the outlet pipe crown elevation to minimize the hydraulic
turbulence at the junction. Consider setting the invert elevation of the outflow
pipe at least 0.1 feet (30 mm) lower than the lowest inflow pipe invert
elevation to accommodate the hydraulic losses through the structure.
h. The downstream pipe configuration, slope and size must have capacity for
the upstream hydraulic peak flow. The pipe size must not decrease
downstream in the direction of flow.
3-4.1
i.
j.
During design evaluate the potential for infiltration of fine soils into drainage
pipe joints and if it is a known maintenance issue at the Installation, specify
watertight joints to mitigate the possibility.
Minimum Pipe Size.
Use a minimum inside diameter of 12 inches (300 mm) for storm drainage piping (not
including roof drainage piping) for runs 50 feet (15.2 m) or less and where the existing
downstream pipe is a 12-inch (300 mm) inside diameter with sufficient capacity;
otherwise, use a minimum inside diameter of 15 inches (375 mm).
3-4.2
Provide minimum cover for all pipes sufficient to support imposed dead and live loads
for the pipe materials used, 24 inches (600 mm), of the pipe diameter, or greater than
frost penetration according to UFC 3-301-01, whichever is greater. For pipe in nonpaved areas, account for loads from expected maintenance equipment. Increase depth
of cover, pipe material strength, or bedding requirements to accommodate the imposed
loads during and after construction. For pipe under rigid pavement minimum cover may
15
UFC 3-201-01
1 June 2013
be reduced to 12 inches (300 mm) from the top of pipe to the finished grade and to 6
inches (150 mm) from the top of the pipe to the bottom of concrete pavement if:
a. Reinforced concrete pipe (ASTM C76, Class V) is used.
b. Design assumptions and calculations are approved by the Government Civil
Engineer.
Determine maximum cover for all individual pipe and culvert installations underlying
roads, streets, and open storage areas subject to H-20 live loads. See Chapter 9 of the
FAA document AC 150/5320-5C for additional design guidance on minimum and
maximum cover.
3-4.3
Design Velocity.
Provide a minimum full flow velocity as indicated in Table 3.3. Determine full flow
velocity using the Manning equation under no surcharge at peak flow conditions.
Consider a minimum slope of 0.2 percent for constructability.
Table 3.3: Design Velocity
3-4.4
Item Description
Requirement
Best Practices
Min. 2 ft/sec
(0.61 m/sec)
Min. 3 ft/sec
(0.914 m/sec)
Use Mannings roughness coefficient, n of 0.013 for smooth concrete pipe. For other
drainage materials see state or local regulatory agencys requirement.
3-4.5
Material Selection.
Provide storm drain system materials in conformance with the UFGS to meet specific
site conditions and soil characteristics. Consider thermal expansion of pipe material
based on pipe location and temperatures of stormwater.
3-4.6
Culverts and outfalls must have headwalls, endwalls, wingwalls, flared or mitered end
sections at free outlets. In areas of seasonal freezing, the structure must also be
designed to preclude detrimental heave or lateral displacement caused by frost action.
The most satisfactory method of preventing such damage is to restrict frost penetration
beneath and behind the wall to non-frost-susceptible materials. Positive drainage
behind the wall is also essential. Outlets and endwalls must be protected against
undermining, bottom scour, damaging lateral erosion, and degradation of the
downstream channel.
16
UFC 3-201-01
1 June 2013
3-4.7
Storm Structures.
Storm structures for roads and site drainage must be in accordance with the UFGS,
State Department of Transportations (DOT) Standards and Specifications where the
project is located or the requirements of the applicable local regulatory agency that
governs stormwater management, whichever is more stringent. Structures must
provide access for maintenance. Internal dimensions must not be less than 2 feet (600
mm) in any one direction. Ensure that catch basins, curb inlets, and manholes are of
adequate size to accommodate inlet and outlet pipes.
Provide structures of cast-in-place or precast concrete. Masonry structures are allowed
for shallow installations less than 5 feet (1.52 m) in depth. Design structure frames,
covers and grates to withstand traffic loadings and meet any additional requirements set
forth in the using agency criteria for the particular application. Select grate type based
on such factors as hydraulic efficiency, debris handling characteristics, pedestrian and
bicycle safety, and loading conditions. Grates in traffic areas must be able to withstand
traffic loads. DoD projects require fixed ladders on all structures over 12 feet (3.66 m)
in depth.
3-5
Use of stormwater pump stations is not allowed except with explicit authorization by the
Government. Design stormwater pump stations in accordance with the criteria
referenced in the paragraph entitled, Design Criteria in Chapter 3.
3-6.1
Existing pump stations may be upgraded where a complete hydraulic analysis shows
that the pump station can operate at the proposed capacity in conformance with the
jurisdictional requirements for a new pump station of equal capacity. Include effects on
the existing force main to its point of discharge in the hydraulic analysis, and if
networked, the effects on all other pump stations connected to the system. This
analysis is required whenever additional flow is added to a pump station, even if
physical changes to the station are not proposed.
3-7
UFC 3-201-01
1 June 2013
surrounding the facility. When provided, fence must be at a minimum 4 feet (1.22 m)
high with locking access gates.
3-8
Provide security barriers at all locations where security fences must cross drainage
ditches or swales to ensure that intruders are prevented from passing under the fence.
Pipes larger than 10 inches (250 mm) in diameter that cross under security fences
require protective measures. Designs must comply with the physical security criteria
referenced in the earlier paragraph entitled Antiterrorism and Security in Chapter 1.
3-9
AIRFIELD DRAINAGE
3-9.1
For design of drainage systems for DoD airfields and heliports, use the minimum
required by the local governing authority for DoD airfield and heliports or the minimum
required as follows, whichever is more stringent:
a. Runways and Taxiway Pavements 2 year storm frequency.
b. Apron Pavements - for Army and Air Force projects, 2 year storm frequency;
for Navy and Marine Corps projects, 5 year storm frequency.
Ponding is not allowed on taxiway and runway pavements including paved shoulders.
Ponding around apron inlets must not exceed 4 inches (100 mm). Center 50 percent of
runways; center 50 percent of taxiways serving these runways; and helipad surfaces
along the centerline must be free from ponding resulting from storms of a 10-year
frequency.
3-9.2
3-9.2.1
Grading.
Curbs and gutters are not permitted to interrupt surface runoff along a taxiway or
runway. The runoff must be allowed unimpeded travel transversely off the runway and
then directed to the area inlets. Inlets spaced throughout the paved apron construction
must be placed at proper intervals and in well-drained depressed locations.
3-9.2.3
Open Channels
Open channels or natural water courses are permitted only at the periphery of an airfield
or heliport facility and must be well removed from the landing strips and traffic areas.
3-9.3
UFC 3-201-01
1 June 2013
Avoid drainage patterns consisting of closely spaced interior inlets in pavements with
intervening ridges for airfields. Such grading may cause taxiing problems, including
bumping or scraping of wing tanks. Crowned sections are the standard cross sections
for roadways, runways, taxiways, and safety areas. Crowned sections generally slope
each way from the center line of the runway on a transverse grade to the pavement.
If there is a long, gradually sloping swale between a runway and its parallel taxiway (in
which the longitudinal grade, for instance, is all in one direction), additional inlets should
be placed at regular intervals down this swale. Should this be required, ridges may be
provided to protect the area around the inlet, prevent bypassing, and facilitate the entry
of the water into the structure. If the ridge area is within the runway safety area, the
grades and grade changes will need to conform to the limitations established for runway
safety areas in other pertinent publications.
Watertight joints are recommended under airfield pavements.
3-9.3.1
The use of plastic pipe is not approved for use under any type of airfield pavement
except for subsurface water collection and disposal.
3-9.3.3
Design structure frames, covers and grates to withstand airfield traffic loadings and
meet any additional requirements set forth in the using agency criteria. Isolate airfield
structures from the pavement section. Provide structures of cast-in-place or precast
concrete; do not use masonry structures in airfield construction.
Use ductile iron or steel grates and covers. Inlet grating and frames must be designed
to withstand maximum aircraft wheel loads, considering the gear configuration, of the
largest aircraft using or expected to use the facility. Commercially manufactured grates
and frames have been designed specifically for airport loadings. Provide hold-down
devices to prevent grate displacement by aircraft traffic. If manufactured grates are
used, the vendor must certify the design load capacity.
For structures that will be required to support both in-line and directional traffic lanes
such as diagonal taxiways or apron taxi routes, do not consider load transfer at
expansion joints in the design process; however, if specific knowledge about the longterm load transfer characteristics of a particular feature supports the use of load transfer
in the design of a particular drainage structure, then an exception can be allowed and
load transfer considered.
3-9.4
Safety
19
UFC 3-201-01
1 June 2013
Avoid attracting wildlife to the facility; avoid a Bird/Animal Aircraft Strike Hazard (BASH)
issue.
20
UFC 3-201-01
1 June 2013
CHAPTER 4 PAVEMENTS
4-1
SURFACED AND UNSURFACED ROADWAYS AND SITE
PAVEMENTS.
Provide geometric design of vehicular roads and streets in accordance with Chapter 2
of this UFC. Unless specified otherwise in project specific requirements, design
pavement based upon anticipated vehicles and loadings for a 25 year life; however,
sections shall not be less than the minimums indicated below. Use pavement design
criteria and procedures recognized by the Department of Transportation (DOT) in the
state in which the project is located or UFC 3-250-01 for roads and parking areas not
trafficked by any special military vehicles. When state design criteria and procedures
are used, the entire pavement section must conform in every detail to the applicable
state criteria and materials must conform to the DOT material specifications.
The use of UFC 3-250-01 is mandatory for design of roads and parking areas trafficked
by special military vehicles and in OCONUS locations. Special military vehicles include,
but are not limited to: cranes, aircraft tow tractors, forklifts, container handling vehicles,
tracked vehicles, heavy military cargo trucks (greater than 10,000 pounds (4535 kg) (,
i.e. HEMTT), heavy equipment transport systems (HET), palletized load systems (i.e.
M1074, M1075, etc), mine resistant ambush protected vehicles (MRAP), and Stryker
vehicles.
4-1.1
Frost Conditions
The design must address seasonal frost conditions per State DOT. For overseas
locations or locations where the State DOT does not address seasonal frost conditions
use UFC 3-250-01.
4-1.2
Recycled Materials
Flexible Pavements.
4-1.3.1
Provide a minimum thickness of granular base of 4 inches (100 mm). Provide a thicker
aggregate base or subbase(s) if required to protect weak subgrade soils or to reduce
frost penetration into the subgrade.
4-1.4
Rigid Pavements.
The minimum flexural strength for portland cement concrete pavements at 28 days is
650 psi (4.48 MPa). No reduction in thickness will be allowed for increased flexural
strength. The minimum compressive strength for portland cement concrete sidewalks,
curbs and gutters is 3500 psi (25 MPa). Provide air entrainment in all exterior concrete
21
UFC 3-201-01
1 June 2013
pavements in areas subject to freezing temperatures. Use plain (non-reinforced)
concrete for rigid pavements for roads, streets and open storage areas at military
installations; use reinforced concrete for odd-shaped slabs or mismatched joints. An
odd-shaped slab has a length to width ratio greater than 1.25. Clearly indicate on the
drawings the specific individual slabs requiring reinforcement.
During design evaluate the potential for ASR and specify requirements for aggregates
and cementitious materials to mitigate the possibility of ASR occurring in the concrete
job mix formula for the project.
4-1.4.1
Concrete Pavement.
4-1.4.1.1
Plain Concrete.
The minimum thickness of plain concrete for any military road, street, or open storage
area is 6 inches (150 mm).
4-1.4.2
Joints.
Provide joints in a manner to form a regular rectangular pattern and to prevent random
or uncontrolled cracking. Do not allow the use of insertable forms for contraction joints.
The use of keyed joints are discouraged, but may be used subject to evaluation of
subgrade strength, loadings, pavement thickness, and details in UFC 3-250-01 and
UFC 3-250-04. Dowels and tie-bars shall not be placed closer than 0.6 times the dowel
or tie-bar length from the planned joint line.
4-1.5
Permeable Pavements.
Aggregate Pavements.
Use UFC 3-260-01 and UFC 3-260-02. Key joints for rigid pavements are not allowed
for airfields.
22
UFC 3-201-01
1 June 2013
APPENDIX A REFERENCES
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION
OFFICIALS (AASHTO)
http://www.transportation.org
A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets
Roadside Design Guide
Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges
AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE
http://www.concrete.org
ACI 522R, Report on Pervious Concrete
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
http://www.tea.army.mil
SDDCTEA Pamphlet 55-8, Traffic Engineering Study Reference
SDDCTEA Pamphlet 55-14, Traffic Engineering for Better Signs and Markings
SDDCTEA Pamphlet 55-15, Traffic and Safety Engineering for Better Entry Control
Facilities
SDCCTEA Pamphlet 55-17, Better Military Traffic Engineering
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
http://www.wbdg.org/ccb/browse_cat.php?o=29&c=76
DoD 4715.5-G Overseas Environmental Baseline Guidance Document
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA PROGRAM
http://www.wbdg.org/
Consult active UFCs for all aspects of design, including but not limited to:
UFC 1-200-01, General Building Requirements
UFC 2-100-01, Installation Master Planning
UFC 3-101-01, Architecture
UFC 3-201-02, Landscape Architecture
23
UFC 3-201-01
1 June 2013
UFC 3-210-10, Low Impact Development
UFC 3-220-01, Geotechnical Engineering
UFC 3-230-01, Water Storage, Distribution, and Transmission
UFC 3-230-03, Water Treatment
UFC 3-240-01, Wastewater Collection
UFC 3-240-02, Domestic Wastewater Treatment
UFC 3-250-01, Pavement Design for Roads, Streets, Walks, and Open Storage Areas,
target publication date DECEMBER 2013. Use UFC 3-250-01FA, Pavement
Design for Roads, Streets, Walks, and Open Storage Areas, and 3-230-06A,
Subsurface Drainage, as interim criteria until publication of UFC 3-250-01.
UFC 3-250-04, Standard Practice for Concrete Pavements
UFC 3-260-01, Airfield and Heliport Planning and Design
UFC 3-260-02, Pavement Design for Airfields
UFC 3-301-01, Structural Engineering
UFC 3-460-01, Design: Petroleum Fuel Facilities
UFC 3-530-01, Design: Interior and Exterior Lighting and Controls
UFC 3-600-01, Fire Protection Engineering for Facilities
UFC 4-010-01, DoD Minimum Antiterrorism Standards for Buildings
UFC 4-020-01, DoD Security Engineering: Facilities Planning Manual
UFC 4-022-01, Security Engineering: Entry Control Facilities/Access Control Points
UFC 4-022-02, Selection and Application of Vehicle Barriers
UFC 4-510-01, Design: Medical Military Facilities
UFC 4-860-01FA, Railroad Design and Rehabilitation
24
UFC 3-201-01
1 June 2013
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
(FAA)
AC 150/5320-5C, Surface Drainage Design 1,
http://www.faa.gov/airports/resources/advisory_circulars/index.cfm/go/document.curr
ent/documentNumber/150_5320-5
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
(FHWA)
Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, (MUTCD) and supplement, Standard
Highway Signs and Markings (SHSM), http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/
FEDERAL GEODETIC CONTROL COMMITTEE (FGCC)
Standards and Specifications for Geodetic Control Networks,
http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/FGCS/tech_pub/1984-stds-specs-geodetic-controlnetworks.htm
INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL (ICC)
http://www.iccsafe.org
International Building Code (IBC)
International Plumbing Code (IPC)
NATIONAL SOCIETY OF PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS (NSPS)
http://www.nspsmo.org
Model Standards for Topographic Surveys
NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL, TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD (TRB)
http://www.trb.org
Highway Capacity Manual
25
UFC 3-201-01
1 June 2013
26
UFC 3-201-01
1 June 2013
APPENDIX B BEST PRACTICES
This appendix identifies background information and practices for accomplishing certain
civil design and engineering services. The Designer of Record (DoR) is expected to
review and interpret this guidance and apply the information according to the needs of
the project. If a Best Practices document has guidelines or requirements that differ from
the UFGS or UFC, the UFGS and the UFC must prevail. If a Best Practices document
has guidelines or requirements that are not discussed in the UFGS or UFC, the DoR
must submit a list of the guidelines or requirements being used for the project with
sufficient documentation to the Government Civil Engineer for review and approval prior
to completing design.
B-1
The Whole Building Design Guide (www.wbdg.org) provides additional information and
discussion on practice and facility design, including a holistic approach to integrated
design of facilities.
The WBDG provides access to Construction Criteria Base (CCB) criteria, standards and
codes for the DoD Military Departments, National Aeronautics and Space Administration
(NASA), and others. These include, UFC, UFGS, Performance Technical Specifications
(PTS), design manuals, and specifications. For approved Government employees, it
also provides access to non-government standards.
B-2
Functional relationships.
Operational efficiency.
Future expansion.
Open space passive and active.
A buildings relationships to its support facilities and to other primary facilities influence
its location. Proximity to access roads, existing utility lines, and other compatible
functions (especially if they share facilities or have interdependent activities) also
influence location. When a building is a shared facility, it should be centrally located and
within a reasonable distance from all participating users. Buildings which depend upon a
shared facility should orient either the front building face or a doorway area towards the
shared facility.
B-2.2 Street and Parking Area Design.
Consider bicycle lanes and pedestrian corridors to reduce vehicle traffic.
B-2.2.1
UFC 3-201-01
1 June 2013
Consider the following in locating access drives:
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
Spacing.
Corner Clearances.
Sight Distances.
Left Turns.
Entrances.
Grading and Drainage.
Traffic Controls.
When a safe sight distance cannot be met, consider the following alternatives:
a. Removal of sight obstructions.
b. Relocation of the access drive to a more favorable location along the access
road.
c. Prohibition of critical movements at the access drive.
d. Relocation of the access drive to another access road.
B-2.2.2
Parking Areas.
Refer to scope of work or planning document for total parking space requirement. If the
number of parking spaces is not identified, use parking space guidelines in Table B-1.
Where slopes are steep provide more than one level of parking.
Table B-1: Parking Space Guidelines for Non-Organizational Vehicles
Facility
Administration, Headquarters, and Office
Buildings
Bakeries
Bank and Credit Union, when not included
in a Community Shopping Center
Cafeteria, Civilian, when not included in a
Community Shopping Center
Central Food Preparation Facilities
Chapels
Commissary Stores, Food Sales, when not Contact DeCA for parking requirements
included in a Community Shopping Center
Community Shopping Center, including
4 percent of authorized customers served
such elements as Main Exchange,
Miscellaneous Shops, Restaurant,
28
UFC 3-201-01
1 June 2013
Facility
Commissary Stores, Food Sales, Bank,
Theater, Post Office
Dormitories
Enlisted Personnel Dining Facilities
Family Housing
Libraries
Central
Branch
Maintenance Shops
Medical Facilities
Officers Quarters
Schools, Dependent
Without Auditorium
With Auditorium
Security Offices (at gates) for military
installations of:
100 to 2,000 population
2,001 to 4,000 population
4,001 to 6,000 population
6,001 to 10,000 population
10,001 and over
Service Clubs
5 spaces
10 spaces
15 spaces
20 spaces
To be based on a special study
2 percent of enlisted personnel or officer
29
UFC 3-201-01
1 June 2013
Facility
Swimming Pools
Temporary Lodging Facilities
Theaters, when not included in a
Community Shopping Center
Warehouses
B-2.2.3
Off-Street Parking.
b. Islands and Medians. Locate islands at the ends of parking stalls and at the
intersections of parking aisles. The islands establish turning radii for vehicular
movement and protect end stalls. Consider the 52 inches (1.3 m) motorist eye
level viewing height when providing shrubs and small trees.
B-2.2.4
Motorcycle Parking.
Buffers
Provide a 20 feet (6.10 m) wide buffer strip to separate parking areas from adjacent
streets.
B-2.2.6
30
UFC 3-201-01
1 June 2013
Design considerations for drop-off areas include adequate width and length to
accommodate the safe movement of vehicles in and out of the flow of traffic.
B-2.2.7
Delivery and service trucks need to access service doors in buildings. Delivery may
require dock facilities, which need to accommodate the necessary maneuvering into
and out of the dock. Design considerations for delivery zones include:
a. Separate service access drives from parking circulation because these
functions are incompatible. Service access that is required through a parking
area goes straight to and straight out of the service area.
b. On a dead-end service drive, provide the necessary turning movements.
c. Provide for visual screening with walls, fences or plant material.
B-2.2.8
Dumpsters.
The design of garbage and trash removal areas is controlled by the size and location of
the dumpster and is coordinated with the local management company. Design
considerations for dumpster pads include:
a. Maintain a forward movement for dumpster trucks through the site. Design for
dumpster trucks to approach the pad in a straightforward manner, align with
the dumpster, reverse away from the pad and exit forward from the site.
b. Screen the pad with fences, walls or plant material.
B-2.2.9
Facilities with drive thru lane(s), such as banks, pharmacies, and fastfood restaurants,
require careful and clear establishment of traffic patterns and a continuous traffic flow.
The standard configuration for a single or double-service position facility does not lend
itself to a twolane approach and departure design. It usually relies on some form of
loop system. Average stacking distance is recommended as 180 feet (55 m). Stacking
space is determined by subtracting the number served (serving time averages 2-3
minutes per customer) from the expected arrivals per 15-minute period (4-14 minutes is
the average) and multiplying the difference times 20 feet (6.10 m). Recommended
parking for facilities with drive thru lane(s) is 17.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. feet (93.0
square meters) of building area. Design considerations for facilities with drive thru
lane(s) include:
a. Maintain traffic lanes into and out of the drive thru windows while working with
other on-site vehicular traffic flow including parking.
b. Minimize interference with pedestrian traffic flow.
c. Provide the recommended average stacking distance in the drive-thru lanes.
d. Provide the recommended average stacking distance on-site to prevent traffic
safety conflicts with access roads.
31
UFC 3-201-01
1 June 2013
e. Use curb and planting islands for vehicle control.
f. Provide adequate pavement markings.
B-2.3 Airfield Pavements.
For additional guidance on design and construction of airfield pavements see Innovative
Pavement Research Foundation (IPRF) IPRF-01-G-002-1 (ACPA JP007P), Best
Practices for Airport Portland Cement Concrete Pavement Construction (Rigid Airport
Pavement).
B-3
UFC 3-201-01
1 June 2013
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Low-Water Crossings: Geomorphic, Biological, and Engineering Design Considerations,
http://www.fs.fed.us/t-d//php/library_card.php?p_num=0625%201808P
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
Through WBDG, consult active Air Force publications, including manuals and
engineering technical letters.
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Through WBDG, consult active Army publications, including engineering manuals, and
engineer technical letters.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
(FAA)
AC 150/5320-5C, Surface Drainage Design 2,
http://www.faa.gov/airports/resources/advisory_circulars/index.cfm/go/document.curr
ent/documentNumber/150_5320-5
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
(FHWA)
Hydraulic Design of Highway Culverts (HDS-5) (FHWA-NHI-01-020),
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/resourcecenter/teams/geotech/geo_042006_3.cfm
Urban Drainage Design Manual (HEC-22) (FHWA-NHI-01-021),
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/hydraulics/pubs/10009/page00.cfm
INNOVATIVE PAVEMENT RESEARCH FOUNDATION (IPRF)
http://www.iprf.org
IPRF-01-G-002-1, Best Practices for Airport Portland Cement Concrete Pavement
Construction (Rigid Airport Pavement)
INTERLOCKING CONCRETE PAVEMENT INSTITUTE (ICPI)
http://www.icpi.org
Permeable Interlocking Concrete Pavements Manual - Design, Specification,
Construction, Maintenance
For Chapter 3, Sections 3-1 through 3-8: Best Practice for Storm Drainage Systems
33
UFC 3-201-01
1 June 2013
http://www.trb.org
Access Management Manual
UNI-BELL PVC PIPE ASSOCIATION
http://www.uni-bell.org
Handbook of PVC Pipe: Design and Construction
UNI-TR-6-97, PVC Force Main Design
WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION (WEF)
http://www.wef.org
Design of Wastewater and Stormwater Pumping Stations, Manual of Practice FD-4
34