l8 Deflection Calculations
l8 Deflection Calculations
l8 Deflection Calculations
CONCRETE
STRUCTURES
Deflection Calculations
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in
any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written
permission of the European Concrete Platform: BIBM (International Bureau for Precast Concrete);
CEMBUREAU, The European Cement Association; EFCA (European Federation of Concrete Admixtures
Associations); ERMCO (European Ready Mixed Concrete Organisation).
8. Deflection Calculations
Introduction
This should be redrafted as appropriate
in each country
Overview
In the past structures tended to be stiff with relatively short spans. As
technology and practice have advanced, more flexible structures have
resulted. There are a number of reasons for this, including:
Note
Tensile strength
The tensile strength of concrete is an important
property because the slab will crack when the tensile
stress in the extreme fibre is exceeded. In Eurocode 2
the concrete tensile strength, fctm, is a mean value
(which is appropriate for deflection calculations) and
increases as the compressive strength increases.
The degree of restraint to shrinkage movements will
influence the effective tensile strength of the concrete.
A layout of walls with high restraint will decrease the
effective tensile strength. Typical examples of wall
layouts are given in Figure 1. For a low restraint layout
the following expression may be used for the concrete
tensile strength:
fctm,fl = (1.6 h/1000) fctm > fctm
where
fctm,fl = Mean flexural tensile strength of reinforced
concrete
fctm = Mean tensile strength of concrete
Creep
Creep is the time-dependant increase in compressive
strain in a concrete element under constant
compressive stress. Creep is usually considered in the
design by modifying the elastic modulus using a creep
coefficient, , which depends on the age at loading,
size of the member and ambient conditions, in
particular relative humidity. Eurocode 2 gives advice on
the calculation of creep coefficients in detail in Annex B.
It also advises on the appropriate relative humidity to
use in Figure 3.1.
The cement strength class is required in the
assessment of creep, however, at the design stage it is
often not clear which class should be used. Generally,
Class R should be assumed. Where the ground
granulated blastfurnace slag (ggbs) content exceeds
35% of the cement combination or where fly ash (pfa)
exceeds 20% of the cement combination, Class N may
be assumed. Where ggbs exceeds 65% or where pfa
exceeds 35% Class S may be assumed.
Elastic modulus
The elastic modulus of concrete is influenced by
aggregate type, workmanship and curing conditions.
The effective elastic modulus under sustained loading
will be reduced over time due to the effect of creep.
These factors mean that some judgement is required to
determine an appropriate elastic modulus. Eurocode 2
gives recommended values for the 28-day secant
modulus, Ecm, (in Table 3.1) and makes
recommendations for adjustments to these values to
account for different types of aggregate. The long-term
elastic modulus should be taken as:
Ec,LT = Ec28/(1 + )
where
Ec28 = 28-day tangent modulus = 1.05 Ecm
Loading sequence
The loading sequence and timing may be critical in
determining the deflection of a suspended slab
because it will influence the point at which the slab will
crack (if at all) and is used to calculate the creep factors
for the slab. A loading sequence is shown in Figure 2,
which shows that in the early stages relatively high
loads are imposed while casting the slab above. The
loading sequence may vary, depending on the
construction method.
Smaller loads are imposed when further slabs are cast
above. The loads are then increased permanently by
the application of the floor finishes and erection of the
partitions. Finally, the variable actions are applied to the
structure and, for the purpose of deflection calculation,
the quasi-permanent combination should be used. (See
How to design concrete structures using Eurocode 2:
Introduction to Eurocodes5 for further information on
combinations of actions.) However, it is likely that the
quasi-permanent combination will be exceeded during
the lifetime of the building and, for the purpose of
determining whether the slab might have cracked, the
frequent combination may be critical.
Cracking
Deflection of concrete sections is closely linked to the
extent of cracking and the degree to which cracking
capacity is exceeded. The point at which cracking
occurs is determined by the moments induced in the
slab and the tensile strength of the concrete, which
increases with age. Often the critical situation is when
the slab is struck, or when the load of the slab above is
applied. Once the slab has cracked its stiffness is
permanently reduced.
It is therefore necessary to find the critical loading stage
at which cracking first occurs. This critical loading stage
corresponds with the minimum value of K, where:
where
W
fctm
Figure 3
Outline of rigorous method for calculating deflection
Shrinkage curvature
Shrinkage depends on the water/cement ratio, relative
humidity and the size and shape of the member. The
effect of shrinkage in an asymmetrically reinforced
section is to induce a curvature that can lead to
significant deflection in shallow members. This effect
should be considered in the deflection calculations.
Rigorous method
Simplified method
Figure 5
Precamber
A slab or beam can be precambered to reduce the effect
of deflection below the horizontal (see Figure 8).
However, in practice too much precamber is generally
used and the slab remains permanently cambered. This
is because of the difficulty in accurately calculating
deflection. A precamber of up to half the quasipermanent combination deflection could be used, but a
lower figure is recommended. Precamber does not
reduce the deflections affecting partitions or cladding.
Flat slabs
Flat slabs are very popular and efficient floor systems.
However, because they span in two directions, it can be
difficult to calculate their deflection. TR588 gives several
suitable methods for assessing flat slab deflection. Of
these, a popular method is to take the average deflection
of two parallel column strips and to add the deflection of
the middle strip spanning orthogonally to get an
approximation of the maximum deflection in the centre of
the slab.
The recommended acceptance criteria for a flat slab are
shown in Figure 9.
Accuracy
The calculation of deflection in Eurocode 2 using the
rigorous method presented here is advanced. It can be
used to take account of early-age construction loading
by considering reduced early concrete tensile strengths.
However, the following influences on deflections cannot
be accurately assessed:
Construction loading.
Elastic modulus.
Therefore any calculation of deflection is only an
estimate, and even the most sophisticated analysis can
still result in +15% to -30% error. It is advisable to give a
suitable caveat with any estimate of deflection that
others are relying on.
Cladding tolerances
References
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
EN 199211, Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures. General rules and rules for building.
MOSS, R M & BROOKER, O. How to design concrete structures using Eurocode 2: Beams. The Concrete
Centre, 2006.
MOSS, R M & BROOKER, O. How to design concrete structures using Eurocode 2: Slabs. The Concrete Centre,
2006.
MOSS, R M & BROOKER, O. How to design concrete structures using Eurocode 2: Flat slabs. The Concrete
Centre, 2006. .
NARAYANAN, R S & BROOKER, O. How to design concrete structures using Eurocode 2: Introduction to
Eurocodes. The Concrete Centre, 2005
BRITISH CEMENT ASSOCIATION. Early striking and improved backpropping. BCA, 2001. (Available from
www.concretecentre.com)
PALLETT, P. Guide to flat slab formwork and falsework. Construct, 2003
THE CONCRETE SOCIETY. Technical report No. 58 Deflections in concrete slabs and beams. The Concrete
Society, 2005.
Acknowledgements
This guide was originally published by BCA and The Concrete Centre in the UK. The authors of the original publication
were R Webster CEng, FIStructE and O Brooker BEng, CEng, MICE, MIStructE