193 The Pogroms in Kyrgyzstan

THE POGROMS IN KYRGYZSTAN
Asia Report N193 23 August 2010
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................. i

I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1
II. JUNE 1990 .......................................................................................................................... 3
III.2010 ..................................................................................................................................... 4
A. REGIME CHANGE .........................................................................................................................4
B. THE SECURITY ORGANS: NEUTRAL OR HOSTILE? ........................................................................5
C. THE MAYOR OF OSH: A QUITE DIFFICULT MAN.......................................................................6
IV.MAY 2010 IN JALALABAD: THE WATERSHED ...................................................... 7

A. BATYROV AND RODINA ...............................................................................................................8
B. THE TEYIT BURNINGS: A RUBICON IN ETHNIC RELATIONS ......................................................9
C. THE SECURITY ORGANS DID NOT FORGIVE HIM .....................................................................10
V. POGROMS ...................................................................................................................... 11
A. BEGINNINGS ..............................................................................................................................11
B. A WELL-ORGANISED MOB ........................................................................................................11
C. CHEREMUSHKI ...........................................................................................................................12
D. THE USE OF ARMOURED VEHICLES............................................................................................13
E. WEAPONS SEIZURES AND DISTRIBUTION ...................................................................................14
F. EXPLAINING THE VIOLENCE .......................................................................................................14
1. The official version ....................................................................................................................14
2. Two narratives ...........................................................................................................................15
VI.UNANSWERED QUESTIONS ...................................................................................... 17

A. THE BAKIYEV FAMILY ROLE .....................................................................................................17
B. WERE THE UZBEKS ARMED?......................................................................................................18
VII. AFTERMATH ............................................................................................................... 18

A. THE HUMAN COST .....................................................................................................................18
1. Death toll....................................................................................................................................18
2. Destruction .................................................................................................................................18
3. Refugees.....................................................................................................................................19
B. REFERENDUM ............................................................................................................................19
VIII.THE INTERNATIONAL MOOD: SHADES OF PESSIMISM ............................... 20

A. THE U.S. AND RUSSIA: GRIM AND GRIMMER .............................................................................20
B. UZBEKISTAN: KARIMOV AS A MODERATE ..................................................................................22
C. AN OPENING FOR JIHAD? ...........................................................................................................23
IX.POLITICAL FALLOUT ................................................................................................ 24

A. THE BAKIYEV FAMILY: CRISIS MANAGEMENT ..........................................................................24
B. WINNERS ...................................................................................................................................25
C. TWO DAYS IN AUGUST: HUMILIATION FOR THE GOVERNMENT ..................................................26
X. CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................ 27
APPENDICES
A. MAP OF KYRGYZSTAN .....................................................................................................................29
B. ABOUT THE INTERNATIONAL CRISIS GROUP ....................................................................................30
C. CRISIS GROUP REPORTS AND BRIEFINGS ON ASIA SINCE 2007 .........................................................31
D. CRISIS GROUP BOARD OF TRUSTEES ................................................................................................33
Asia Report N193
23 August 2010

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
An explosion of violence, destruction and looting in
southern Kyrgyzstan on 11-14 June 2010 killed many
hundreds of people, mostly Uzbeks, destroyed over 2000
buildings, mostly homes, and deepened the gulf between
the countrys ethnic Kyrgyz and Uzbeks. It was further
proof of the near total ineffectiveness of the provisional
government that overthrew President Kurmanbek Bakiyev in April 2010, and is now trying to guide the country
to general elections in October. Given the governments
slowness to address the causes and consequences of the
violence, the danger of another explosion is high. Even
without one, the aftershocks of the looting, murder and
arson could seriously damage Kyrgyzstans ailing economy, cause a significant outflow of ethnic Uzbeks and
other minorities, and further destabilise the already fragile
situation in Central Asia in general. The route back to
stability will be long and difficult, not least because no
reliable security or even monitoring force has been deployed
in the affected area. It should start with an internationally
supported investigation into the pogroms, as visible an
international police and diplomatic presence as possible
to discourage their recurrence, and close coordination on
effective rebuilding of towns and communities.
The most disturbing and dangerous consequence of the
violence is that the central government has now lost de
facto control of the south. Melis Myrzakmatov, the mayor
of Osh, a ruthless and resolute young nationalist leader,
has emerged from the bloodshed with his political
strength, and his extremist credentials, stronger than ever,
and is now the souths pivotal political figure. Given this,
there is a strong risk that any attempt at investigation or
even reconciliation will be subordinated to many politicians desire to enlist his support for the October elections.
The government seems reluctant to challenge this nationalist mood, which it clearly feels is popular within the
majority Kyrgyz community. If the south remains outside
of central control, there is a strong risk that the narcotics
trade, already an important factor, could extend its power
still further, and that the region could quickly become a
welcoming environment for Islamist guerrillas.
Though the government blames external elements, including Islamic militants, the pogroms in fact involved many
forces, from the remnants of the Bakiyev political machine to prominent mainstream politicians and organised
crime, especially the narcotics trade.
Most of the violence took place in Osh, Kyrgyzstans
southern capital, with a less bloody outburst in and around
the regions other main city, Jalalabad. The forces that
stand behind the violence have not yet been fully identified. This is unlikely to happen without an exhaustive and
professional international investigation. Certain things
are, however, clear. Although the profound belief in the
Uzbek community that the pogroms were a state-planned
attack on them is not borne out by the facts, there are
strong indications that prominent political figures, particularly in Osh city, were actively, perhaps decisively,
involved. Most security forces in the region, who in Osh
currently answer to local leaders rather than the capital,
were slow to act or complicit in the violence. The pattern
of violence in Osh moreover suggests a coordinated strategy; it is unlikely the marauders were spontaneously
responding to events. The criterion that guided looters in
all the districts attacked was ethnic, not economic. Junes
violence had been prefigured by serious ethnic and political tension in Jalalabad in May. At the time, however,
this was largely ignored by the central government and
the international community.
Successive governments have failed to address ethnic
tensions in the south, or even admit their existence. Many
features of the 2010 violence strongly resemble the last
round of bloody ethnic clashes, in 1990. At that time
there was no attempt to address the root causes of the
problem, and the same phenomena burst to the surface in
an even more virulent form twenty years on. During the
intervening two decades, state neglect and economic decline have deepened social deprivation, increasing the
pool of poorly educated and mostly unemployed young
men who, in 2010 as in 1990, proved particularly susceptible to destructive rhetoric.
The Pogroms in Kyrgyzstan

Crisis Group Asia Report N193, 23 August 2010
One of the most striking differences between 1990 and

2010 was that twenty years ago a large number of elite
Soviet troops were deployed in the region for six months
to normalise the situation. This time, a weaker government facing a greater challenge has refused any external
help, arguing that it can handle the situation itself. Even
the token and already delayed deployment of 52 police
advisers by the Organization for Security and Co-operation
in Europe (OSCE) has been the target of repeated protests
by nationalist demonstrators who seek to weaken the central government. Few international observers or foreign
governments believe that the government is capable of
assuring the bare minimum of governance in coming
months; an embarrassingly unsuccessful attempt to remove Myrzakmatov has weakened the government, and
the president, even further. It has also reinforced Myrzakmatov's hold on the south.
The international communitys response to the crisis was
inglorious. Most countries deferred to Russia, which declined to send peacekeepers and has since predicted the
countrys disintegration. The UN Security Council did
nothing. The International Committee of the Red Cross
(ICRC) deployed with laudable speed, while key UN
agencies were initially frustrated by internal security rules
that even some senior UN officials felt were excessively
constricting and which played into the hands of local
officials in Osh who appeared keen to limit the number of
outsiders in the area. Looting of aid convoys was a serious
problem for some time after the Osh authorities announced
that order had been restored.
The situation throughout the country remains tense. In the
south, however, it is explosive. The government tries to
maintain a facade that the situation is returning to normal.
In fact the Osh authorities are pursuing a punitive antiUzbek policy that could well trigger more violence and
in the view of many observers, Kyrgyz and international,
may be intended to do just that. Moderate ethnic Kyrgyz
are aggrieved at sweeping foreign allegations that have
made them the villains of the crisis. Meanwhile, there is
already talk within the Uzbek areas of Osh largely secular and middle class, a long way from the Islamists core
constituency in the south of the welcome that the jihadi
guerrillas would receive if they stepped up their activities
in the south. The conversations are so far restricted to a
tiny segment of the Uzbek community. Without prompt,
genuine and exhaustive measures to address the damage
done by the pogroms, however, the country risks, sooner
or later, another round of terrible violence.
Page ii
RECOMMENDATIONS
To the Government of Kyrgyzstan:
1. Support a full, open and internationally backed enquiry
into the events in May 2010 in Jalalabad, and June in
Osh and Jalalabad.
2. Take a strong public stand against positions of
extreme nationalism and ethnic exclusivity put forward
by prominent national and regional politicians.
3. Cooperate with and support immediate deployment of
OSCE police mission to Osh, international humanitarian
organisations and diplomatic presence to reduce the
likelihood of new violence.
To the International Community:

4. Call for and support a thorough enquiry into the
events of May-June 2010, with central roles assigned
to international organisations with expertise in this
field such as the United Nations High Commissioner
for Human Rights and the OSCE High Commissioner
on National Minorities. Make it clear that further aid
to the Kyrgyz government will be conditional upon
such an investigation.
5. Elaborate a unified strategy for the reconstruction of
the south, involving extensive on-ground monitoring
including the early deployment to Osh of the OSCE
police mission and other international humanitarian
and diplomatic observers the recognition of cultural
sensitivities and the need to avoid worsening conflict
risks.
6. Ensure that no international aid funds go to the Osh
government as long as it advocates an exclusionary
ethnic policy and refuses to submit to the authority of
the central government.
7. Engage in a long-term program of police reform and
training, sweeping reforms of the judiciary and legal
system.
8. Start the process of seeking a framework for the
equitable coexistence of all ethnic groups in Kyrgyzstan.
To the Members of the UN Security Council,

in particular the U.S. and Russia:
9. Undertake active contingency planning on a priority
basis, jointly and severally as appropriate, so that in
the event of another explosion in the south threatening
lives and the stability of Kyrgyzstan and the Central
Asia region, the international community or key members and institutions will be in a position to respond
in a timely and effective manner.
Bishkek/Brussels, 23 August 2010
Asia Report N193
23 August 2010

I. INTRODUCTION
It is little coincidence that the latest outburst of intercommunal violence took place at a time when Kyrgyzstans
central government was seriously weakened. History was
in fact repeating itself.1 In 1990, when at least 600 died in
ethnic violence according to official estimates, the Soviet
Union was moving rapidly towards disintegration, and
local political forces were manoeuvring to fill the power
vacuum. Twenty years on, a weak and tentative provisional government was struggling to present a semblance
of leadership and steer the country through to elections in
October.
By 2010 Uzbeks had replaced Russians as the second
largest ethnic group in Kyrgyzstan. According to the
2009 census, there were 768,000 Uzbeks, many employed in agriculture and commerce, and 419,000 Russians.2 Inspired by the democratic claims of the regime
that overthrew Kurmanbek Bakiyev in April 2010, and by
the fact that many provisional government leaders were
from the north and thus traditionally more sympathetic to
the Uzbek minority, Uzbeks once again were tempted to
propose greater linguistic and political representation.
They underestimated a strong feeling within Kyrgyz society that any concessions on linguistic and cultural
grounds to the Uzbeks threaten Kyrgyzstans own cultural survival. They also underestimated the readiness of
many Kyrgyz politicians to make an anti-Uzbek position
part of their political platform.
At 27.8 million, the population of Uzbekistan dwarfs

Kyrgyzstans 5.3 million inhabitants. Even moderate
Kyrgyz note with dismay that Russian is more widely
heard in Bishkek, and Uzbek in Osh, than their own language. As of July 2010, all except some 30,000 of Kyrgyzstans Uzbeks live in the southern part of the country.
They constitute the majority in a number of major districts,
including Karasuu and Uzgen, just outside Osh city, and
make up over 40 per cent of that citys population.3
Osh and Jalalabad oblasts (regions) account for 44 per
cent of Kyrgyzstans population, some 2.1 million people.4
Their history since the collapse of the Soviet Union has
been one of diminishing options in education, health and
employment. With the disappearance of major Soviet industrial and agricultural enterprises that had provided tens
of thousands of jobs, the region slipped into an increasing
reliance on subsistence farming and labour migration,
cross-border trade and narcotics smuggling. If Kyrgyzstan
is one of the poorest countries in Asia, Osh and Jalalabad
are at the bottom of most national economic, social or
demographic indicators.
Half the population of Osh region and 40 per cent of Jalalabad region is classified by the government as poor, that
is, earning less than $38 a month.5 While ethnic Kyrgyz
view the Uzbeks as perceptibly wealthier, slightly more
Uzbeks are in fact classified as poor. Just under 47 per
cent of the Kyrgyz household heads were so described in
For further reading see Asia Briefing N102, Kyrgyzstan: A

Hollow Regime Collapses, 27 April 2010; Asia Briefing N97,
Central Asia: Islamists in Prison, 15 December 2009; Asia
Report N150, Kyrgyzstan: The Challenge of Judicial Reform,
10 April 2008; Asia Briefing N79, Kyrgyzstan: A Deceptive
Calm, 14 August 2008; Asia Report N118, Kyrgyzstans
Prison System Nightmare, 16 August 2006; Asia Report N109,
Kyrgyzstan: A Faltering State, 16 December 2005; Asia Report
N97, Kyrgyzstan: After the Revolution, 4 May 2005; and Asia
Report N42, Central Asia: The Politics of Police Reform, 10
December 2002.
2
In 1990 Uzbeks numbered 550,096, Russians 916,558.
Crisis Group communication, National Statistical Committee,

July 2010; Kyrgyzstan: Delicate Ethnic Balance, IRIN, UN
Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, 15 August
2010, www.irinnews.org/Report.aspx?ReportId=89526.
4

2009 [The Census of the Population and
Housing of the Kyrgyz Republic in 2009], National Statistical
Committee of the Kyrgyz Republic, vol. 1;
-
[Major Socio-demographic
Characteristics of the Population and Housing Units], 2009,
pp. 63-64.
5
Poverty data provided to Crisis Group by the National Statistical Committee of Kyrgyz Republic on 8 July 2010.

a 2007 study, as opposed to 55.5 per cent of Uzbeks.6 The

two regions have the highest population growth rates, the
lowest rates of contraception use, and, other than the
capital, Bishkek, the greatest population density.7 School
drop-out rates are the countrys highest, class sizes are
among the largest, nationwide scores in basic mathematics, science and reading skills are the lowest.8 Osh region
has the lowest average salary half the national monthly
average of $141 (6,049 som) and the highest official
unemployment rate.9 While official figures are massively
underestimated, a former governor of Osh estimates that
the real rate is over 20 per cent. Health care delivery is
among the countrys worst. The area is almost completely
ignored by foreign investors. Osh region had the lowest
amount ($700,000) in foreign direct investment nationwide
in 2008, the last year for which such data are available.10
Approximately 30 per cent of the population are young
people between fifteen and 25, usually unemployed and
given the minimal level of education of many, barely employable.11 Young people, both urban and rural, formed
the bulk of the marauders on the streets in June.
Kyrgyzstan: Poverty Assessment Report (2007), World

Bank, vol. I, p. 15, www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/
WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2007/10/31/000020439_2007
1031085518/Rendered/PDF/408641KG0v1.pdf.
7
The Census, National Statistical Committee, op. cit., pp. 61,
79; -
: - 2009 [The Socio-Economic
Situation of the Kyrgyz Republic: January-December 2009],
2009, p. 120;
2004-2008 [Living standards of the Population
of the Kyrgyz Republic 2004-2008], 2009, p. 36.
8
Out of School Children in the Kyrgyz Republic, UNICEF,
2008, p. 15, www.unicef.org/kyrgyzstan/OUT-OF-SCHOOLEng.pdf; :

15- PISA-2006 [Learning for life: outcomes of the international comparative study on functional
literacy among 15-year old students PISA-2006], Centre for
Educational Assessment and Teaching Methods, 2008, pp. 131,
132, 128-129, www.testing.kg/files/pdf/PISA06_NatRep_KGZ.pdf.
9
The Socio-Economic Situation of the Kyrgyz Republic:
January-December 2009, National Statistical Committee, op.
cit., pp. 97-98. The official figures are massively underestimated:
a former governor of Osh estimates that the real rate is over 20
per cent. For more, see
[The Annual Statistical Hand
Book of the Kyrgyz Republic], National Statistical Committee,
2009, p. 376.
10
The Annual Statistical Hand Book of the Kyrgyz Republic,
National Statistical Committee, op. cit., p. 412.
11
The Census, National Statistical Committee, op. cit., p. 86;
Suiunbek Syrdybaev, Zaure Sydykova and Gulnara Kudabaeva,
Youth: A Strategic Resource for Kyrgyzstan, UNV-UNDP
White Paper, 2008, www.un.org.kg/en/publications/publications/
Page 2
Research for this report was carried out in Osh and Jalalabad between 29 June and 13 July 2010. As is often the
case after episodes of extreme violence, many witnesses
were still in shock, confused or unsure about dates and
details. With this in mind, key interviews were where
possible carried out twice. Although many videos of the
events are available, few are of much use. Most are circulating anonymously, without dates or times for the images.
Some are edited in such a way as to compromise the narrative; others, especially the so-called confessions of
mercenaries, usually scared young looters, were obviously made under conditions in which the subjects feared
for their lives. Many videos of atrocities are being distributed by mobile phone, perpetuating fear and anger
rather than shedding light on events.
All official studies of the 1990 ethnic violence were classified, and no attempt was made to address its root causes,
thus laying the groundwork for the violence of 2010. This
time, the government again seems hesitant to endorse a
thorough investigation, obviously fearful that this could
further exacerbate political and social tensions. The
causes, organisation, participants and the consequences of
the pogroms can only adequately be assessed by an exhaustive and impartial enquiry. Given the political and
ethnic polarisation in Kyrgyz today, this will be a serious
challenge.
article/5-publications/3454-youth-a-strategic-resource-forkyrgyzstan.

II. JUNE 1990

In 1990, the Soviet Union began its final descent into disintegration. The Baltic states were loosening their ties
with Moscow and May 1990 had seen the unprecedented
spectacle of anti-perestroika demonstrators hijacking the
May Day celebrations on Red Square. Centrifugal tendencies had even reached Central Asia, the far edge of the
Soviet Union. That March, a group of ethnic Uzbek
members of the Kyrgyz Communist Party called for an
Autonomous Soviet Republic to be formed within the
confines of the Kyrgyz Soviet Socialist Republic, to answer
the needs of the Uzbek minority.12 So-called informal
groups (), activists often with a strongly
ethnic-based program, emerged in both Kyrgyz and
Uzbek communities.
Violence in June 1990 was triggered by a land dispute in
Osh involving two such groups. Kyrgyz activists from
Osh Aymagi, demanded that authorities hand over land
belonging to a kolkhoz (collective farm), whose workers
and residents were predominantly Uzbek. The activists
aim, according to a contemporary KGB account, was to
create a purely Kyrgyz settlement.13 Uzbek activists
protested, and after six demonstrators were killed, went
on a rampage, attacking police and Kyrgyz communities.
There was looting and depredation on both sides. Most
accounts agree that during the first days of the unrest, the
Uzbeks had the upper hand, then groups of Kyrgyz arrived from the surrounding countryside, inflicting serious
casualties on them.14
Page 3
The violence was finally halted by the deployment of

over 2,000 members of the Soviet airborne. It was six
months before Moscow felt the situation had normalised
to the point that the troops could be withdrawn.15 Asked
in a June 2010 newspaper interview to compare the 1990
violence with the events of 2010, Colonel-General
Vyacheslav Achalov, who had commanded the airborne
deployment, said the situation in 2010 was worse. The
new Kyrgyz government cannot get [the situation] under
control, he said. The provisional government does not
have capable people, everyone is scared of taking responsibility. The police are scared, and so is the military.16
KGB17 reports written immediately after the 1990 unrest
noted a number of factors that had contributed to the
bloodshed. These included a perception among poorer
ethnic Kyrgyz that Uzbeks were becoming more prosperous, too free and easy in their behaviour and controlling
the markets. Uzbek demands for autonomy also caused
friction. Uzbeks claimed that predominantly ethnic Kyrgyz police and political officials sided with ethnic Kyrgyz
protesters.18 The KGB reported that Kyrgyz villages in
the mountain area of Alay sent groups to the city to fight
the Uzbeks, and that ethnic Kyrgyz demanded that police
and local authorities arm them. KGB investigators also
recorded that someone had marked the walls of many
homes with the words Uzbek or Kyrgyz to identify the
residents.19
15
12

, , ,
.-, [A Declaration to the Chairman of the Council of Nationalities from
a group of members of the CPSU, veterans of the Great Patriotic War, Labour, residing in the city of Jalalabad, Osh Oblast
of the Kirgiz SSR]. Available at www.nlobooks.ru/rus/
magazines/nlo/196/328/378. The letter raised many issues that
continue to concern the Uzbek community, including underrepresentation in administrative bodies, and tension between
Uzbeks and Kyrgyz, especially youth on both sides.
13

. [Secret reportnote by the head of the KGB Directorate for Osh oblast to the
secretary of the Osh oblast committee of the Communist Party
of Kirghiziya, U. Sydykov], 24 June 1990.
14
Crisis Group interview, Kyrgyz academic, Bishkek, 15 July
2010. The interviewee noted that, as 70 per cent of the casualties were Uzbeks, the Soviet prosecutor-generals office blamed
the Kyrgyz for the unrest. In fact, he added, it was Uzbeks
who started it all, just like this time.
: [Violence in
a recurrent form], Moskovskiy Komsomolets, 17 June 2010,
www.mk.ru/politics/interview/2010/06/17/510606-kirgiziyanasilie-v-vozvraschennoy-forme.html.
16
Ibid.
17
These are (1)
.
[Report-note by the Chairman of the KGB of the
Kirghiz SSR D Asankulov on events in Osh oblast], compiled
for the First Secretary of the Communist Party of Kirgiziya A.
Masaliyev, 14 June 1990; and (2)
[Secret report note], op. cit.
18
Following the unrest ethnic Uzbeks called inter alia for the
resignation of all members of the city and oblast party committees. One KGB note remarked that a significant part of the
population, including a number of officials, succumbed to provocative rumours. Such a veiled remark nonetheless represented unusual criticism at the time of Soviet state and communist functionaries. KGB notes, op. cit. The addressee of one of
the KGB reports, Osh Party Chief Usen Sydykov, was widely
accused of responsibility for the 1990 unrest. He went on to
become a close Bakiyev associate, and in May 2010 was accused of helping organise anti-government demonstrations. See
Section IV.
19
In 1990 homes of KGB officials were also identified.

The Kyrgyz authorities produced several studies on the

unrest, distribution of which was limited to a few top
leaders. There was little public discussion of the events,
and few efforts to dispel any of the myths that emerged
during the violence, an academic involved in the reports
recalled. It was better this way, the academic added. Ethnic relations are not appropriate for public discussion. He
continued, people are very primitive and do not understand the nuances of such issues.20 Most of the factors
and features noted by the KGB in 1990 were to resurface
in 2010.
Page 4
III. 2010
A. REGIME CHANGE
On 7 April 2010, following several months of intensifying anti-government protests, President Kurmanbek
Bakiyev was overthrown after street clashes in Bishkek
that left 86 people dead. A few weeks earlier, a group of
opposition leaders had formed the Central Executive
Committee (CEC) of the Peoples Kurultay (assembly) to
coordinate the protests. On 7 April the CEC assumed
power, with Roza Otunbayeva as president, declaring that
it would stay in office for six months to oversee a new
constitution and both parliamentary and presidential elections planned for October 2010.21 Popular expectations
were low, as many new leaders had previously served the
old regime, and the opposition has long been bedevilled
by infighting.22
The provisional government indeed turned out to be unruly
and disunited. Leaders took unilateral decisions. One
deputy premier remarked that she sometimes heard about
government personnel changes from the media.23 Another
senior leader arbitrarily suspended the operations of a
bank paying state pensions and salaries.24 Otunbayevas
first deputy, Almaz Atambayev, occasionally surprised
foreign visitors with his erratic behaviour, and during the
10-14 June crisis disappeared completely from the public
eye. When he resurfaced, he caused more alarm by announcing that the unrest in the south was so well planned
that similar problems could be expected in the capital and
elsewhere.25
21
20
Crisis Group interview, academic, Bishkek, 15 July 2010.
For further details, see Crisis Group Report, Kyrgyzstan: A

Hollow Regime Collapses, op. cit. Subsequently the decision
was taken to delay presidential elections until December 2011,
with Roza Otunbayeva remaining in office until then. She was
inaugurated on 3 July 2010.
22
For the situation in 2004-2005, see Crisis Group Report, Kyrgyzstan: After the Revolution, op. cit.
23
. ,
[E.Ibraimova
admits that the Provisional Government has problems regarding
a clear personnel policy], Akipress news service, 22 April 2010,
www1.kg.akipress.org/news:197701.
24
The decision was only reversed, by presidential decree, after
a senior member of the National Bank complained of political
sabotage in the build-up to the 27 June referendum on the new
constitution.
[NBKR
calls on Provisional Government to restore the legal framework
of AUB nationalisation], Akipress news service, 18 June
2010, http://business.akipress.org/news:89471.
25

,

While the economic and social situation deteriorated, and

the new government stumbled from crisis to crisis, one of
its dominant figures, Omurbek Tekebayev, pushed
through a hastily drafted constitution, replacing the presidential system of government with a parliamentary one.
The new constitution was passed in a nation-wide referendum on 27 June. Despite frequent waves of anxiety fed
by rumours of further violence, the government failed
signally to reassure the population that it was in charge
and to maintain the regular dialogue with its people that
the situation required. As weeks went on, insecurity worsened, with waves of panic passing through Bishkek and
northern towns.
Meanwhile measures that the new government promised
would be priority issues dropped off the agenda. There
was no word of an investigation into the violence of 7
April. There was no indication of an investigation into
fuel deliveries to the U.S. airbase at Manas International
Airport, which had allegedly channelled millions of dollars
to the Bakiyev regime. Instead there were increasing
complaints of corruption on the part of those close to the
government. These included the seizure of private businesses a phenomenon long associated with the Bakiyev
regime. In the business world threats, grabs and raiding
have become the norm, said Ravshan Jeenbekov, deputy
chair of the main pro-government party, Ata-Meken.26
B. THE SECURITY ORGANS: NEUTRAL

OR HOSTILE?
A particular source of anxiety, both inside the government and generally in Kyrgyz society, was the strong
suspicion that the countrys security services, army and
especially the interior ministry were not fully loyal to the
new regime. Some leading politicians, a number of whom
were targeted by police or security services during the
Bakiyev years, avoided relying on them. We are not sure
what side they will come down on if we call for their assistance, said one party leader who was protected by
burly, body armour-clad young men with automatic rifles,
[Almazbek Atambayev, events in the

south were so well planned that we expect provocations in
Bishkek and Chui Oblast], 24.kg news service, 15 June 2010,
www.24.kg/politic/76502-almazbek-atambaev-sobytiya-nayuge-kyrgyzstana.html. This time we are ready, he told journalists. We have already deployed an APC (armoured personnel
carrier) at a checkpoint outside of the capital. If necessary, we
will put a second one there.
26
,
[Investment exodus. Russian and
Kazakh businessmen are leaving Kirgizya], Nezavisimaya
Gazeta Daily, 16 August 2010, www.ng.ru/cis/2010-08-16/6_
invest.html.
Page 5
provided by a relative who is in the private security business.27 The government seemed to prefer to call on volunteers druzhinniki some paid by private benefactors, to
keep the peace. Members of the opposition with strong
links to the security services, like Felix Kulov, a former
prime minister and interior minister, or police general
Omurbek Suvanaliyev, say the security services were
demoralised after the events of 7 April when police and
other forces were attacked and badly mauled by antigovernment demonstrators.28 Foreign observers and some
Kyrgyz officials believe the malaise goes deeper.
After a visit to Bishkek in May, one senior Western official remarked that the security organs and the police
seemed to be observing the political situation with interest, waiting to see who would win.29 Senior Kyrgyz government officials agree. After 7 April few changes were
made in the top levels of the so-called power ministries:
defence, interior, the state security committee, emergency
situations and the state prosecutors office. The Kyrgyz
government was unable to provide Crisis Group with the
number of such changes, but one senior security official
conceded that these rarely went lower than deputy minister.30 Given the previous regimes placement of Bakiyev
loyalists in all key security positions, this situation presents
the government with a dilemma: risk unrest by replacing
disloyal security officials or risk subversion by allowing
them to remain.
Loyalty to the previous regime was based on personal
interest, not ideology. The Bakiyev regime developed a
system which, in exchange for unquestioning loyalty, allowed key players near total impunity, and thus boundless
opportunities for corruption. Especially in the power ministries, a senior security official said, all aspects of state
power are corrupt police, military, state security, border
guards, the prosecutors, the courts, everything.31 This
problem is even more pronounced in the south, the heartland of the previous regime, where Bakiyev and his influential brothers took care to appoint security officials who
were loyal to them and who in turn benefited handsomely
from their largesse.
27
Crisis Group interview, Bishkek, 7 June 2010.

Crisis Group interview, Felix Kulov, Bishkek, 16 June 2010;
Omurbek Suvanaliyev, Bishkek, 5 July 2010.
29
Crisis Group interview, senior Western official, June 2010.
30
Crisis Group interview, Bishkek, 29 July 2010.
31
28

The president and his brothers had established a family

empire in the south that controlled most aspects of the
economy, both legal and shadow. A key element of this,
Western officials, Russian parliamentarians and members
of the current government say, was the drug trade, allegedly overseen by Janyshbek Bakiyev, the presidents
brother and chief bodyguard. The familys business interests in general, meanwhile, were supervised by Akhmat
Bakiyev, long described as the shadow governor-general
of the south (see below, section IX). In late May 2010,
the secretary of the National Security Council, General
Alik Orozov, told a newspaper that some police and security officials were still being paid by the Bakiyev family:
in the daytime law enforcement officers search for the
Bakiyev brothers, and in the evening take them food.32
As one very high-ranking official explained, in the south
all law enforcement organisations and security services
are sick with a disease. If they are not personally loyal to
Bakiyev, a lot came to power under him. Generals and
high [security] officials feel very vulnerable. Most senior security officials and politicians are very saddened
that power has left the south, and passed to a predominantly northern Kyrgyz political leadership. This causes
the new government a lot of difficulties.33 Following
the president's unsuccessful effort in August to remove
the mayor of Osh, the city's police chief joined a rally in
support of the mayor.34
C. THE MAYOR OF OSH:

A QUITE DIFFICULT MAN35
When a regime changes in Kyrgyzstan, a whole system of
patronage has to be restructured. This covers not only
politics but business and usually the criminal world, as the
three elements are tightly connected and often overlapping.36 A nimble politician can take advantage of the
32
-
... [Someone in Kyrgyzstans security structures even now is taking a salary from
the Bakiyevs], Kyrgyznews website, 24 May 2010, reprinting
article from Delo newspaper, 19 May 2010, www.kyrgyznews.
com/readarticle.php?article_id=3353.
33
Crisis Group interview, high-level official, Bishkek, 22 July
2010.
34
Southern Kyrgyz mayor challenges gov't authority, Associated Press, 20 August 2010.
35
2010.
36
For linkages between crime and the political elite under two
previous presidents, see Asia Report N81, Political Transition
in Kyrgyzstan: Problems and Prospects, 11 August 2004; and
Crisis Group Report, Kyrgyzstan: After the Revolution, op. cit.
The latter report noted that the term businessman covers a
Page 6
transition and breakdown of the old patronage systems to

fill the political vacuum.
Melis Myrzakmatov moved fast to consolidate his position
in Osh. A businessman and former member of parliament
from the Bakiyev-era ruling Ak Zhol party, Myrzakmatov
was appointed mayor in January 2009. After Bakiyevs
overthrow, Myrzakmatov briefly positioned himself as a
loyalist of the deposed president and, according to two
sources, met Bakiyev when he fled south. Sensing that
Bakiyevs position was weakening, he quickly threw his
weight behind the new government.37
A rally in central Osh on 15 April offered a telling illustration of his organising techniques. Myrzakmatov called
the meeting in support of the provisional government.
While the provisional government is free-wheeling to the
point of dysfunction, press accounts say the organisation
of the mayors rally left nothing to chance. Local government employees and students were ordered to turn up
and bussed in. And when former President Bakiyev and
his security appeared on the edge of the square, trying to
stage a demonstration of their own, a group of young
guys in sports costumes38 peeled off from the mayors
group. They charged at the former president and his security, attacking their cars. Bakiyev left in some haste, by
one account jumping into a vehicle as it pulled away.39
This was Bakiyevs last attempt to appeal to his people
before he left the country, fleeing first to Kazakhstan and
then to Belarus.40
By June 2010, Myrzakmatov was the unchallenged leader
in Osh, both city and region, and a major political force
throughout the south. The power agencies, police, security and others, took their orders from him, not Bishkek.41
And, despite so unceremoniously chasing his former pa-
range from effectively criminal authority figures to fairly well

respected entrepreneurs.
37
Crisis Group interview, long-term political observer, Osh,
July 2010; senior government official, Bishkek, 26 July 2010.
38
The reference to sports costumes carries a specific connotation in post-Soviet politics and points to the nexus of politics,
crime and business in the city. It suggests an informal security
team hired by businessmen, politicians or other figures of authority, recruited from sport-clubs martial arts specialists and
similar. Among those who said that the mayor has such a detail
are a senior government minister, a long-time observer of Osh
politics quoted, and former Osh police chief General Suvanaliyev.
39

[In Osh opponents and supporters of Kurmanbek
Bakiyev clash], Kloop.kg, 15 April 2010.
40
Ria-Novosti news service, Moscow, 16 April 2010,
www.rian.ru/politics/20100416/223076124.html.
41
Crisis Group interview, high official, 22 July 2010; senior
Western diplomats, July 2010.

tron from Oshs main square, he was careful not to lose

contact with the family, numerous sources maintain.42
As a veteran observer of Osh politics put it, he keeps a
foot in each camp the provisional government and the
Bakiyev clan but answers to neither.43
Page 7
IV. MAY 2010 IN JALALABAD:

THE WATERSHED
In mid-May a wave of political unrest hit Jalalabad city,
about one hours drive from Osh, and the home of former
President Bakiyev and his family. At the time the complicated skein of events, with their back and forth of allegation
and counter-allegation, were ignored by most observers
inside and outside Kyrgyzstan. This was deeply unfortunate. May in Jalalabad prefigured June in Osh: the unreliability of the police and state security structures; the
passivity or impotence of central government; Kyrgyz
fears of resurgent Uzbek assertiveness; the dominant role
played by individual political parties, groups or individuals; and the sharply differing, confusing and highly partisan accounts of events. Had these issues been addressed
firmly in May by the central government and had the
international community, Crisis Group included, paid
enough attention to press the government to do so
events in Osh might have been mitigated or prevented.
After fleeing Bishkek on 7 April, Bakiyev and close relatives
took refuge in their home village of Teyit ( in Russian), 8km from Jalalabad, from where they launched
desultory efforts to seize back power in various southern
localities, including the failed rally in Osh. When they
could not mobilise serious opposition to the new regime,
Bakiyev fled the country on 15 April. Other family members,
notably his brother Akhmat, remained in hiding in the
area and continued, the government says, to organise protests. Janysh Bakiyev reportedly took refuge in GornoBakakhshan, Tajikistan.44
The Bakiyev family launched their most serious challenge to the new regime on 13 May. Bakiyev loyalists,
allegedly funded by one of the presidents brothers, and
organised by a close aide, Usen Sydykov, briefly seized
the regional administrative headquarters in Batken, in the
far south west of the country, along with those in Osh and
Jalalabad. The first two takeovers quickly fizzled, but a
stand-off ensued in Jalalabad, compounded by the reluctance of state security and police to intervene. Two political parties in the forefront of support for the provisional
government stepped in to restore order. One was Ata-Meken,
led by Omurbek Tekebayev, at the time a deputy president
and one of the most influential politicians in post-Bakiyev
44
42
Crisis Group interviews, southern Kyrgyzstan, 13 July 2010;

high-level official, Bishkek, 22 July 2010; opposition politician, Bishkek, 25 July 2010; senior official, Bishkek, 27 July
2010.
43
Crisis Group interview, long-term political observer, Osh, 2
July 2010.
Kyrgyz officials claim that he is being hidden by colleagues

in the drug business. See for example: . : .
- [A. Orozov: J.
Bakiyev is with the narco-barons in Gornobadakhshan],
Kyrgyz News website, 19 May 2010, www.kyrgyznews.com/
readarticle.php?article_id=3331. A. Orozov is secretary of the
National Security Council.

Kyrgyzstan. The other was Rodina, a southern, predominantly Uzbek party headed by an Uzbek businessman,
Kadyrjan Batyrov, a bitter enemy of the Bakiyev family.
A. BATYROV AND RODINA

Rodina in particular and secular Uzbeks in general were
enthusiastic supporters of the new government, a rarity in
post-7 April politics. Most Kyrgyz citizens welcomed
Bakiyevs overthrow, but were discouraged by the paucity of new faces in the provisional government. Rodina
on the other hand, had suffered serious setbacks under
Bakiyev and was energised by the presidents ouster. In
late 2007, Bakiyevs advisers had decided to abolish the
unspoken political agreement whereby opposition parties
were allowed a modest number of parliamentary seats if
they were not too persistent in protesting against electoral
fraud.45 The party, founded in January 2007 in anticipation of parliamentary elections, found itself excluded
from both the national parliament and local legislatures,
and was largely quiescent until 7 April.46
Batyrov, Rodinas leader, had made a swift, substantial
fortune in the wild capitalism that followed the USSRs
collapse. A shop manager in Soviet times, he was one of
the first post-Soviet tycoons lumber merchant, broker in
Russias first post-communist stock exchange, owner of a
number of factories in Russia and elsewhere, as well as
an airline, Batyr Avia.47 In the late 1990s he founded a
university and other educational institutions in Jalalabad
catering to Uzbeks, thus assuring himself considerable
support among Uzbeks who otherwise wondered about
the origins of his wealth. Unlike some key figures in the
new provisional government, Batyrov actually favoured
the shift to a parliamentary system, something that Tekebayev, an ethnic Kyrgyz from the Jalalabad area, passionately advocated.48 Despite some doubts among educated
Uzbeks, in 2010 he remained the most influential leader
in the Uzbek community.
On 8 April, the day after Bakiyevs overthrow, Batyrov
addressed a celebratory rally of some 5,000 Uzbeks. He
called on the new government to pursue a policy of
45
See Crisis Group Briefing, Kyrgyzstan: A Deceptive Calm,

op. cit.
46
Batyrov had been active in southern politics since the late
1990s, when he was a prominent member of the Party of Peoples Unity and Concord, which was founded in 1998 and
formed the basis of Rodina.
47
Summary bio-date can be found on
, http://who.ca-news.org/people/462.
48
See for example his comments in atamekenkg.com/index.
php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2732:2010-05-1910-5915&catid=99:politic&Itemid=29.
Page 8
equality and justice.49 He stressed that Uzbeks wanted to

play a role in this new phase of the countrys history.
Kyrgyzstans Uzbek citizens would no longer be observers of events. As tension mounted a few weeks later,
Batyrov emphasised the moderation of Uzbek demands,
denying any interest in an autonomous Uzbek region in
the south a demand that in 1990 had inflamed tensions
between the two communities and noting that he had
proposed to a commission discussing a new constitution
that the Uzbek language be given legal status in majority
ethnic Uzbek areas of the south.50
The seizure by Bakiyev supporters of the Jalalabad regional administrative building on 13 May gave Batyrov
the chance to prove his support for the provisional government and his movements muscle. Rodina, along with
Tekebayevs party, Ata-Meken, fielded some 3,000
activists, armed with staves, blunt instruments and some
firearms.51 Slightly more than half came from Rodina,
according to an eye-witness.52 They converged on the
building and after clashes in the centre of the city accompanied by intense gunfire, forced Bakiyevs supporters
from it. Two people were killed and 49 injured, according
to official figures.53 A number of Kyrgyz media reports
played down Rodinas role in ending the seizure. A freshlycreated Committee for the Defence of Kurmanbek Bakiyev on the other hand declared indignantly that Batyrov
49
[Jalalabad in the centre of world attention], 24.kg news site, 9

April 2010, www.24.kg/investigation/79031-v-aksyjskomrajone-dzhalal-abadskoj-oblasti.html. The report specifically
notes that the demonstrators were Uzbeks.
50
Ata-Meken news service, 19 May 2010, www.atamekenkg.
com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2732:
2010-05-19-10-5915&catid=99:politic&Itemid=29. Interestingly the interview was published at a time when anger at Batyrov
was reaching fever pitch. The press service did not criticise or
express any reservations about the opinions expressed. The
constitutional proposal on Uzbek language disappeared without
trace.
51
Crisis Group interview, Osh journalist who filmed the scene,
Osh, 30 June 2010; Jalalabad journalist who covered events,
Jalalabad, 3 July 2010.
52
Crisis Group interview, Osh journalist who filmed the scene,
Osh, 30 June 2010. Batyrov later claimed that Ata-Meken activists out-numbered Rodina supporters, but his remarks closer
to the events, in speeches on 14-15 May, imply the opposite.
Transcript of speeches in Jalalabad, made available by a Kyrgyz
NGO, Citizens against Corruption. Internal evidence indicates
that the speeches were made on 14-15 May 2010.
53
Azimbek Beknazarov, Summary of 3 months activities of
the general prosecutors office, Kabar news service, 7 July
2010, http://kabar.kg/index.php?option=com_content&task=
view&id=2984&Itemid=3607/07/2010 14:49. Beknazarov was
deputy chair of the provisional government with responsibility
for prosecutors and the judicial system.

who is protecting the provisional government, used

weapons against the supporters of Kurmanbek Bakiyev.54
B. THE TEYIT BURNINGS:

A RUBICON IN ETHNIC RELATIONS
That night an event took place that, in the view of many
observers, galvanised Kyrgyz suspicions of a resurgent
Uzbek menace. A mob burned houses belonging to former President Bakiyev and his relatives in Teyit. Most
accounts hold Batyrov responsible. He denied the accusations, insisting he had wanted to seize the houses, which
he described as the Bakiyev familys general staff, but
that the buildings were torched by others, possibly Bakiyev supporters who wanted to destroy evidence. He also
complained that Ata-Meken leaders had joined him on the
march to Teyit, and called on them to give their version
of events.55
Few ethnic Kyrgyz believe the denials. The incident was,
in the words of a very high-level Kyrgyz government official, a rubicon in ethnic relations.56 The Kyrgyz reaction, the official said, was how do you Uzbeks dare to
burn houses on our territory?57 The incident was crucial
in forming a Kyrgyz aggressive mass among the population
as a whole, the official noted.58 This led to demonstrations in Jalalabad, demands for the governors resignation
and Batyrovs arrest. On 19 May, Batyrovs university,
now viewed by ethnic Kyrgyz as the bastion of evil, the
words of the official quoted above, was ransacked. Three
were killed in an exchange of fire.59 This was likely not a
spontaneous event. A university employee told a Kyrgyz
media site that the Jalalabad education authorities had
informed school principals before the attack that Baty54
: -

[The ex-deputy of the
Kyrgyz parliament Kadyrjan Batyrov used weapons against the
supporters of Kurmanbek Bakiyev], 24.kg news site, 14 May
2010, www.24.kg/community/74074-zhanara-moldokulovayeks-deputat-parlamenta.html.
55
:
[Kadyrjan Batyrov: Address to the people of Kyrgyzstan],
YouTube, uploaded 24 May 2010, www.youtube.com/watch?
v=4uTHSdWQ0i4-.
56
2010.
57
Ibid.
58
Ibid.
59
.
[A. Beknazarov reported on work carried out over the
past three months], Kabar news service. 7 July 2010, http://kabar.
kg/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2984&
Itemid=3607/07/2010. Batyrov has cited a call to protect the
revolution by Beknazarov, like him a Jalalabad native, as his
justification for taking his supporters into the city on 14 May.
Page 9
rovs property would be taken away from him and he

would be arrested.60 Batyrov was in fact charged with a
number of offences connected to the burning of the Bakiyev houses,61 and is now believed to be living abroad, by
some reports in Dubai. In Jalalabad a curfew was declared on 19 May. On 1 June it was lifted.
Batyrovs treatment contrasts sharply with that of Usen
Sydykov, Bakiyevs former close aide and the man accused
of fomenting the unrest in Jalalabad on 13-14 May. On
the evening of 13 May, the provisional governments
State Security Committee made public a number of taped
phone conversations in which, they said, Sydykov discussed
plans for unrest in Osh and Jalalabad. State Security described Sydykov as the direct organiser and coordinator
of all anti-government actions in the south.62 He was later
reported to be in the square in the centre of Jalalabad during the clashes on 13 May, but fled the scene.63
On 14 May he was arrested by Osh police who stopped

two cars carrying him and other associates. In the second
vehicle they found two automatic rifles and ammunition,
along with two-way radios.64 When the prosecutors
office filed charges connected to the 13-14 May events
including murder and the organisation of mass unrest
Sydykov was not named.65 He was, however, subsequently charged with an attempted coup and seizure by
force of state power.66 In early July, however, he was
60
: [Chronicle of a siege:
the view from the inside], 24.kg news service, 20 May 2010,
www.24.kg/community/74521-xronika-osady-vzglyad-iznutri.html.
On 12 June, the first day of unrest in Jalalabad, the university
was torched.
61
A. Beknazarov reported on work carried out over the past
three months, Kabar news service, op. cit.
62
:

[Wiretaps have been made public of phone conversations of
Usen Sydykov, the main organiser of Bakiyev-oriented antigovernment actions], Ferghana.ru news service, 14 May 2010,
www.ferghana.ru/news.php?id=14718&mode=snews. The article also published a copy of a state security document, dated
12 May, approving a wire tap on Sydykov. This referred to
possible widespread unrest in the capital and in the south between 12 and 17 May.
63
Transcript of speeches in Jalalabad, 14-15 May, speech of
Bektur Asanov, Governor of Jalalabad.
64
-

[Osh oblast directorate of internal affairs makes public details
of the detention of Usen Sydykov], Ferghana-Akipress news
service, 15 May 2010, http://fergana.akipress.org/news:80581.
65
Summary of 3 months prosecutor activity, op. cit.
66
[Usen
Sydykov released to house arrest], Azattyk news site (RFE/RL

transferred from prison to house arrest, in view of his advanced age and poor health.67 A senior security official
says he is now advising a number of major political parties from his home.68
The Teyit burnings may well mark the beginning of a
narrative of Uzbek revenge that has now become well-rooted
in large parts of the Kyrgyz community. As one welleducated Kyrgyz professional from Jalalabad recalled,
the incident convinced him of the truth of stories that had
long been circulating that the Uzbeks had been planning their revenge since 1990, hiding weapons in their
mosques, just waiting for the time to strike.69 In the days
to come, a number of Kyrgyz politicians including the
mayor of Osh and senior government officials repeatedly asserted that Batyrov made a series of inflammatory
speeches on Uzbek-language TV stations in Osh. One
frequently repeated version cited Batyrov calling for retribution for 1990.70 In the transcript of the speeches by
Batyrov and others, no such statements can be found.
C. THE SECURITY ORGANS DID

NOT FORGIVE HIM
A moderate Uzbek still in a senior government position in
the south describes such allegations as rubbish. Batyrovs real offence, the official averred, was to criticise the
political and security forces that had, in May 2010 as in
May 1990, been passive in the face of a threat to the state.
This had bred a sense of impunity ()
among enemies of the regime, and had led to the May
disturbances. Batyrovs problem was that he said it in a
very blunt manner, the official recalled. The security
organs did not forgive him.71
Batyrov did, in the course of an adrenalin-infused meeting on 14 May, criticise bitingly and at length the state
security and the police for their loyalty to the Bakiyev
regime. The police and the SNB (State Security), whom
we trusted, today did not justify our trust. And they will
not justify it, he said, according to a transcript of his
speech. He called for the creation of a peoples militia
of 100 Uzbeks and 100 Kyrgyz to help hunt down the
Bakiyev supporters the criminals who were jeopardising stability in Jalalabad. He also belittled the Kyrgyz activists who had joined the assault on the provincial
administration building. Other speakers in the meetings
used language like equal rights for Uzbeks that could,
Kyrgyz language service), 3 July 2010, www.azattyk.kg/content/
news/2089687.html.
67
Ibid.
68
69
Crisis Group interview, Jalalabad oblast, 3 July 2010.
70
Ibid.
71
Crisis Group interview, southern Kyrgyzstan, 13 July 2010.
Page 10
given Kyrgyz hypersensitivity to signs of an Uzbek political revival, have deepened suspicions.72
At a time when the central government was once again
hesitating, perhaps hoping to cut a deal, perhaps unable to
do anything because of the unreliability of the countrys
security services, Batyrov was in essence preparing to
take the law into his own hands. He went too far, commented an official in Bishkek. Mobilising the Uzbek
community increased Kyrgyz nationalist paranoia;
moreover the idea of a Batyrov-backed popular militia
in a major southern city may have been viewed as a challenge to other ambitious politician-businessmen who were
seeking to move into the vacuum left by the fall of the
Bakiyev clan.73
Prominent Kyrgyz leaders, in particular Tekebayev, distanced themselves from Batyrov. Tekebayev denied that
he and Batyrov had ever enjoyed more than distant professional contacts.74 One long-time observer of Central
Asian affairs suggested that the central government had
simply abandoned Batyrov in the hope of avoiding further
violence.75 A senior security official, meanwhile, believes
that those who wanted to incite ethnic tension in the south
set Batyrov up, inciting him to a level of activism that
would provoke many Kyrgyz nationalists.76 With hindsight, another official remarked later, after Jalalabad, the
danger of a pre-emptive strike against Uzbeks by someone or other on the nationalist end of the political spectrum
was very high.77
72
Transcript of speeches in Jalalabad, op. cit.

Crisis Group interview, Bishkek, 27 July 2010; telephone
interview, Kyrgyz politician, 27 July 2010.
74
-
,

[In Kyrgyzstan the leader of the Atat-Meken party, Omurbek
Tekebayev, rejected information that he had friendly relations
with the far from unknown Kadyrjan Batyrov], 24.kg news
service, 13 July 2010, www.24.kg/politic/78676-v-kyrgyzstanelider-partii-laquoata-mekenraquo.html. Tekebayev claimed not
even to have Batyrovs phone number.
75
Sanobar Shermatova,
[The Kyrgyz south and the Uzbek question], Ferghana.ru
news site, 8 June 2010, www.ferghana.ru/article.php?id=6602.
76
Crisis Group interview, senior security official, Bishkek, 29
July 2010.
77
73

V. POGROMS
A. BEGINNINGS
Violence erupted late in the evening of 10 June in the
centre of Osh. Most accounts say that an argument between young Uzbeks and Kyrgyz, inside or near a hall
with gambling machines, flared out of control a little after
11pm. Whether the fight was spontaneous or provoked
remains one of the most important unanswered questions
in the events of June. Several Osh residents said the town
centre had been tense in the days before, but some noted
this was not uncommon in the summer, when groups of
young people from both communities lingered on the
streets. One inhabitant recalled seeing a large group of
aggressive Uzbek and Kyrgyz youth in the centre of
town on the evening of 10 June, as he went to evening
prayers. At that point he was merely irritated that so
many unemployed youth were hanging around.78
When the fight started young men from both communities
phoned friends to come and help.79 Police converged on
the area, as did local politicians trying to calm the situation. At some point there was either an attempt to inflame
the mood or a clumsy effort to stop the fighting: two
eyewitnesses interviewed separately said people in a car
or cars started to shoot into the air, adding to the tension.
One witness noticed a single car, a BMW 735 model without plates;80 the other says the shooting came from two
vehicles.81 The fighting escalated. By one in the morning,
the majority of Osh residents were probably aware that
something terrible was happening. Around that time an
Uzbek newspaper editor, roused by phone calls from the
centre of town, went outside to see what was happening.
Her part of town, known locally as Eastern district, is on
high ground overlooking the city. She could hear gunshots and see smoke over the centre. The streets around
her house were packed with people, she recalled, who
were watching and listening to the events.82
In the early hours of the unrest a large group of young
Uzbeks reportedly broke shop windows and smashed cars
in the centre of Osh, and attacked Kyrgyz. The rumour
78
Crisis Group interview, Osh, 2 July 2010.

Crisis Group interview, Uzbek resident of Vostochny, Osh, 4
July 2010; Kyrgyz student, Osh, 11 July 2010.
80
81
Crisis Group interview, Uzbek resident of Navoi street area,
Osh, 3 July 2010.
82
Crisis Group interview, Barno Isakova, Vostochny district, 2
July and 7 July 2010. She says Vostochny was later attacked by
marauders, gunmen in civilian clothing and an APC. She
counted 21 bodies after the attack, and said that the local clinic
confirmed 61 dead.
79
Page 11
spread that Uzbeks had attacked a university dormitory,

raping, mutilating and killing young Kyrgyz women. This
was quickly transmitted by mobile phone around the city
and to surrounding villages, and proved to be one of the
most tenacious atrocity myths of the pogroms. It still receives wide currency on some websites that have sprung
up in defence of one or the other ethnic group.83
The incident almost certainly did not happen. The security guard on duty at the dormitory that night said that a
crowd had thrown stones, but had not entered.84 Other
researchers were told the same thing, and in July Azimbek Beknazarov, the provisional government deputy
chairman in charge of the judiciary and prosecutors office,
told a Russian newspaper that the incident had never
taken place.85 Later that night, around 3-4am, Oshs former police chief estimates, young Kyrgyz had appeared
on the streets.86 Soon after daylight on 11 June, rioting
was in full swing. The main market, where the bulk of the
traders were ethnic Uzbeks, was ablaze.
Unrest spread from Osh to Jalalabad on 12 June, with
violence and destruction in Bazar-Kurgon and Jalalabad
city itself. Though brutal and destructive, there were considerably fewer deaths 54, two thirds of them Uzbek,
according to local officials.87
B. A WELL-ORGANISED MOB
For the next few days, rampaging bands, almost exclusively ethnic Kyrgyz, had the streets to themselves. They
moved confidently around the city and were rarely, if
ever, impeded by security forces. In the first hours, most
local residents say, they seemed to be urban youth in their
late teens, including students. Later reinforcements came
from villages north of the city, like Kurshab, and as in
1990, in particular from the mountain district of Alay,
80km, or 90 minutes drive from Osh. A resident of Kurshab, a predominantly ethnic Kyrgyz village 45 minutes
by car from Osh, recalled that his village learnt of the unrest by early morning on 11 June. Everyone here has a
cell phone, and a relative there, he explained. They were
told that their brothers were under attack by Uzbeks in
83
For example, Osh Reality: www.osh-reality.info/.

Crisis Group interview, dormitory security guard, Osh, 6 July
2010.
85
, , [Of course, it will be a cockup], Kommersant, 12 July 2010, http://kommersant.ru/doc.
aspx?fromsearch=fd555cd5-fe52-4580-8d23-1d991dfc01dd&
docsid=1412452. Other officials have since confirmed that the
incident did not take place.
86
Crisis Group interview, General Omurbek Suvanaliyev,
Bishkek, 5 July 2010.
87
Crisis Group interview, Jalalabad, mid-July 2010.
84

Osh and that young Kyrgyz women had been raped. They
were told the Kyrgyz were outnumbered, he said, we
had to redress the balance. Two people from his village
were killed in the fighting.88
The mobs that roamed Osh were not for the most part
mindlessly set on random destruction. They were well
organised and often well supplied. As they stayed in some
Uzbek districts for a day or more, residents had the opportunity to observe them closely. Many witnesses say
that small groups of ten to fifteen young marauders answered to one person, usually a somewhat older male,
dressed in casual or sports clothes.89 A Russian resident
of one of the worst damaged districts, Cheremushki, was
able to observe events with relatively little risk because of
his ethnicity. He noted that supplies drinking water,
vodka, flammable liquids were periodically brought to
the marauders near his apartment block. One area, he
said, seemed to be an assembly point, where 30 to 40
people would clump together and discuss things. Close
by was a small kitchen. The witness said firearms were
handed out from the back of a BMW 735 without number
plates.90
Attacks on many Uzbek districts followed a similar pattern. Gunmen armed with automatic rifles led the way.
They were usually described as being older than the looters, sometimes dressed in black, at other times in sports
clothing or camouflage. (The latter does not necessarily
indicate members of the military; camouflage pants and
jackets are often worn by anyone doing manual labour.)
The gunmen would fire at any defenders, forcing them
back from defensive barricades. The smallest number of
gunmen mentioned in any incident was five or six, the
largest twenty to thirty. The choice of homes or businesses destroyed was made on the basis of ethnicity, not
financial gain. The next stage, burning and then looting,
went on for several days and was meticulous in its execution.
Page 12
VIDEO TESTIMONY OF THE EARLY HOURS

During the night and early morning of 11 June, a witness
surreptitiously filmed looters gathered near his home, in
the centre of Osh at the intersection of Kurmanjan Datka
and Aravanskaya Street. Young men, mostly armed with
metal bars and staves, assemble on a street corner in the
centre of the city. A uniformed policeman as well as a
small group of heavy set men in their 30s or 40s, dressed
in track suit tops and casual jackets, are with the younger
men, and seem to be playing a consultative or leadership
role. The older men are deliberate and unhurried in their
movements. Several come in cars, which they leave casually on the street.
A later sequence shows some of the same group thick
set men and young marauders, greeting a military column
moving past. The marauders lift their sticks and bars in
salute. A few soldiers wave. One man in a track suit, with
an automatic rifle hanging from his shoulder, trots across
the road, between two armoured personnel carriers
(APCs) in the military column, and at least two gunmen
stand at the roadside, waving and making no attempt to
hide their weapons. The source of the footage says that
the military column returned later, this time with young
civilians on the trucks alongside the soldiers. On a number of occasions, he added, the older men seemed to be
despatching groups in various directions.91
C. CHEREMUSHKI
Cheremushki, a predominantly Uzbek district, was the
target of extensive looting and arson. The attack started
during afternoon prayers on Friday 11 June.92 The looters
stayed on for several days. Kyrgyz-owned shops and a gas
station some 400 metres from the area under attack continued to function during the pogroms and were untouched. Residents said that local officials appealed for
assistance, but no one came.93 At one point an ethnic
91
88
Crisis Group interview, Kurshab, Osh oblast, 13 July 2010. In

1990 the news also spread quickly into surrounding communities, carried by long-distance bus drivers.
89
Crisis Group interview, local official in one district who gathered testimonies from numerous residents, early July 2010. A
similar description was given by a Russian resident of Cheremushki, a resident of Vostochny district and a resident of the
Uvamskaya street area, the site of later violent clashes.
90
Crisis Group interview, Cheremushki district, 30 June 2010,
reinterviewed 12 July 2010.
The video was made available to Crisis Group in Bishkek on

29 June 2010.
92
Crisis Group interviews, residents, 29 June-13 July 2010.
93
Just after 3pm on Friday afternoon, Cheremushki residents
told journalists that the district was blocked by APCs and
troops. Firing was taking place, armed civilians had already
entered the area, but troops stayed round the edge of the district,
not intervening. :

[Eyewitness: In Cheremushki district, Osh, the government
and security forces do not control the situation], 24.kg news
service, 11 June 2010, www.24.kg/community/75847-ochevidcyv-gorode-oshe-v-mikrorajone.html.

Russian resident went out on the street, unmolested by the

looters. It was as if I wasnt there, he said.94 One looter
told him he had come to help our Kyrgyz brothers who
were under attack. They were looting because the Uzbeks
had started to live too wealthily. When he asked why
they were burning houses as well as looting them, another
looter told him not to ask questions: the attacks had nothing to do with him.95 The Russian lived in one of the
apartment blocks scattered through the district. These are
usually inhabited by non-Uzbeks Slavs, Tatars or Kyrgyz and were mostly untouched, in Cheremushki as in
other affected areas of the city.
Most of the Cheremushki mahalla, or district, consisted of
single storey houses that open onto a courtyard where
flowers, fruit and grapes usually grew. Out of 277 houses
destroyed in Cheremushki, according to figures reported to
the mayors office, six or seven were Kyrgyz, the rest
Uzbek. Three apartments were also damaged.96 The
words Uzbek or Kyrgyz were scrawled on the walls of
many homes. Occasionally houses were marked as Russian or Tatar; some had anti-Uzbek slogans written on
them. Most non-Uzbek houses were untouched, even in
extensively damaged areas. On one section of a badly
destroyed street, the home of a representative of the Tajik
diaspora was unharmed. On a side street the comfortable
home of a retired senior police officer was not attacked,
while others around it had been burned. Elsewhere large
houses said to be owned by Kyrgyz were left alone. The
pattern was similar in most other areas destroyed during
the pogroms.
D. THE USE OF ARMOURED VEHICLES
Page 13
during the violence, usually in support of the marauders.

APCs, some tracked, some wheeled, served specific functions, according to witnesses in numerous parts of the
city. A witness in Osh district, in the centre of the city,
said that one was used on 11 June to clear barricades in
the area, facilitating the looting and destruction of 128
homes.98 Also on 11 June, a group of Uzbek residents
who lived close to the regional hospital watched an APC
approach the barricade they had built. They thought it
was coming to help. Instead the APC, which had a mixture of civilians and men in uniform on it, destroyed the
barricade, opened fire and torched the area.99 On other
occasions an APC was deployed to regain the advantage
for the looters. In Cheremushki, a witness recalls, whenever the marauders encountered serious resistance they
called up an APC. This happened several times, the witness added.100
In Vostochny district an APC opened fire with a large
calibre cannon on a bulldozer that was helping build a
barricade.101 On 12 June an APC flying a large Kyrgyz
flag led a small column of looters, travelling in pickups,
along the main street; the column stopped frequently to
check the ethnicity of shopkeepers and caf owners.102 On
12 June a crowd led by an APC was reported to have
burned 23 houses on Navoi street.103
APCs were also used in the Uvamskaya street area, in the
eastern part of the city, where there were intense clashes
during the latter part of the pogroms. One APC was
rammed by a Kamaz heavy truck; another was said to
have become stuck in a large hole dug by the defenders
using an excavator.104 Residents estimate 43 people were
killed there, and 487 houses destroyed.105
The provisional government admitted that two of its

APCs were seized by marauders in Osh. One broke down,
while the other was quickly recaptured by Kyrgyz special
forces, officials maintain.97 The number of APCs seen
across the city, however, indicates that several were active
98

Crisis Group interview, Uzbeks living next to the provincial
hospital, Osh, 2 July 2010.
100
Crisis Group interview, Cheremushki, 2 July 2010.
101
Crisis Group interview, Uzbek resident of Furkat, Osh, 5
July 2010. The barricade was being built between Furkat and
Vostochny districts.
102
Crisis Group interview, restauranteur, Osh, 7 July 2010. He
was able to convince the marauders that he was not Uzbek and
his house was spared. During the pogroms, however, his Uzbek
son-in-law was killed in Vostochny district. Officials later demanded a 10,000 som (about $220) bribe for a death certificate.
103
Crisis Group interview, Uzbek resident of Navoi street area,
Osh, 4 July 2010.
104
Crisis Group interview, Osh, 9 July 2010, reinterviewed 11
July 2010.
105
Personal communication, 29 July 2010.
99
94
Crisis Group interview, Cheremushki resident, 30 June 2010,

reinterviewed 12 July 2010.
95
Residents of other areas report similar conversations with
looters. In Tuleiken district on Friday 11 June, a car without
plates drew up to a barricade in an ethnically mixed area. A
Kyrgyz resident asked the occupants what they wanted. One
told him to relax, saying in bureaucratically-couched words of
reassurance that their area was not subject to a sweep ().
Crisis Group interview, Kyrgyz resident of Tuleiken neighborhood, 1 July 2010. In another part of the city a Russian resident
asked for one of the weapons being handed out. He was told to
go away, this was not his struggle. Crisis Group interview, July
2010.
96
Crisis Group interview, Cheremushki, 2 July 2010.
97
Crisis Group interview, high-ranking official, 22 July 2010.

E. WEAPONS SEIZURES AND DISTRIBUTION

There are numerous reports that police, military and border forces surrendered weapons or voluntarily handed them
over to the crowd during the unrest.106 Strangely enough
(troops and police) parted with their weapons practically
without a fight or a regret. I will say more: the surrender
of a military arsenal often happened voluntarily, said
Omurbek Suvanaliyev, Osh chief of police during the
pogroms.107 An ethnic Russian member of the Afghan
veterans unit, mobilised by the government to help keep
order, criticised the Kyrgyz army and police for their lack
of discipline and training, as well as their fraternisation
with the looters and those intent on what he called genocide.108
Weapons were also handed out by unidentified civilians
and politicians. Crisis Group was told of weapons being
delivered to marauders and Kyrgyz civilians in Cheremushki and Southeast district.109 Senior Bishkek politicians with southern connections may have also distributed
weapons. A government minister asserted that a senior
opposition politician did so during the unrest.110 A southern regional government official read from what was
probably a police report, describing how the son of a
leading member of the provisional government had raided
the Nooken police station, some 25km from Jalalabad,
during the violence. The politicians son and his accomplices seized seven automatic weapons and several handguns, which they then used for an attack on the nearby
village of Bazar Korgon, during which several people
were killed.111 A prominent opposition politician admitted
that a member of his party in the south had with the
Page 14
permission of the [local] mayor and in his presence received weapons in June, during the events, and had distributed them to people for their protection. Afterwards
he returned them all.112
A local Kyrgyz politician in Osh said, approvingly, that
city officials had also distributed weapons.113 After the
pogroms, officials tried to retrieve the weapons. In one
such instance, a witness said an army major appeared at
his door with a printed list of automatic weapons. The
witness recalled that there were about twenty items on the
sheet of paper, with serial numbers and recipients addresses. Someone had received a weapon and given the
witnesss address. The major was discomfited to learn
that the address was false.114
F. EXPLAINING THE VIOLENCE

1. The official version
In late June the State National Security Service issued
what is essentially the official version of the Osh and
Jalalabad pogroms. By their account, three groups had
been involved: the Bakiyev family; representatives of
national cultural centres Uzbek organisations in this
instance and a broad alliance of Islamic terrorists, including the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan (IMU), the
Islamic Jihad Union, the Taliban and the United Tajik
Opposition. By this account the Bakiyev family had met
twice with Islamists: the presidents younger son Maxim
negotiating with them in Dubai in April, and two unnamed Bakiyev family representatives finalising a $30
million deal in Gorno-Badakhshan, Tajikistan, the next
month, in the personal presence of Mullo Abdullo.115
106

July 2010. As is the case with all statistics connected to the
violence, officials and politicians offer wildly differing estimates of the number of automatic weapons seized. These range
from about 160, according to the security official cited in this
footnote, to 2000, in the opinion of several leading politicians.
107

[I do not want to be an accomplice in a disastrous policy],
Kommersant, 22 June 2010, http://kommersant.ru/doc.aspx?
DocsID=1390360&NodesID=5; and Crisis Group interview,
108
Crisis Group interview, Osh, 30 June 2010. The Afghan veterans
were widely praised as the most disciplined unit on the streets
after the violence. Ethnic Uzbek veterans of Afghanistan also
volunteered, but their assistance was declined.
109
In Southeast district, the weapons were distributed by young
men in a black BMW 5 series, as usual without plates. Crisis
Group interview, July 2010.
110
Crisis Group interview, Bishkek, 21 July 2010; a senior security official later made the same allegation; Crisis Group interview, 29 July 2010.
111
Crisis Group interview, southern Kyrgyzstan, 13 July 2010.
112
Crisis Group interview, Bishkek, 28 July 2010. The politician complained that the party official is now being threatened
with prosecution.
113
114
Crisis Group interview, Osh, 30 July 2010, reinterviewed 12
July 2010.
115
,

[Kyrgyzstans special services assert that people
close to former president Kurmanbek Bakiyev involved international terrorist organisations in the disorder in the south of the
republic], 24.kg news site, 24 June 2010, www.24.kg/osh/
77409-specsluzhby-kyrgyzstana-utverzhdayut-chto-k.html;
: ,

[Keneshbek Dushebayev:
we have proof that the Bakiyevs sought an agreement with international terrorist organizations] 24.kg news service, 24 June
2010, www.24.kg/osh/77418-keneshbek-dushebaev-u-nas-estdokazatelstva-chto.

Page 15
Certain leaders of national cultural centres had aided

and abetted the unrest with their demands for an additional state language and other concessions. One had also
put up $100,000 to organise unrest in Osh. The mention
of national cultural centres and their demands is a clear
reference to Batyrov and his supporters, a number of
whom were subsequently arrested, some of them on
weapons offences.116
ever, and former comrades in arms claim that serious

drug problems have long ruled out his participation in
military operations. There was, finally, no explanation of
why the national cultural centre leaders who, the previous month, had led attacks on the Bakiyev family would
now side with them, directly or indirectly.
Some senior officials distanced themselves from this

sweeping conspiracy. A deputy head of the provisional
government, Azimbek Beknazarov, declared soon after
the fighting subsided that the third force had come from
inside the country. I am convinced that those around
Kurmanbek Bakiyev and Kadyrjan Batyrov were the third
force, he declared.117 Oshs chief of police during the
violence, meanwhile dismissed the idea of outside provocation out of hand. There was no third force, Omurbek
Suvanaliyev told a Russian newspaper.118
Private conversations with Kyrgyz officials, including

very high level ones, tend to focus on local factors in explaining the pogroms. There are two dominant narratives.
One suggests premeditated Uzbek malice, the other an
almost accidental flare up. Both adhere to the so far unproven assertion that the Uzbeks were heavily armed, and
depict the Kyrgyz as responding spontaneously to a perceived threat. In summary, they run as follows:
The government did not explain why the Taliban would

be interested in pogroms in Osh; the IMU and Islamic
Jihad Union do not see eye to eye on jihadist tactics, and,
as organisations with a strong ethnic Uzbek component,
would seem to have little reason to kill their own people
especially in an area which is thought to provide sanctuary to fighters from both organisations. The United Tajik
Opposition ceased to exist with the end of the Tajik civil
war in 1997, and is viewed by the IMU as apostate for
betraying the jihad by negotiating a peace agreement with
the Tajik government. Mullo Abdullo, a former Tajik
guerrilla leader with strong Taliban connections, was accused in 2009 of leading an incursion into the Tavildara
region of Tajikistan. He was never located there, howhtml. One of the reports warned that the Islamic Jihad Union
had reinforced its fighters and were planning attacks on government buildings and other targets. None were subsequently
reported. The second figure in the government, Almazbek Atambayev, had previously claimed unnamed counter-revolutionaries
had paid $10 million for the Osh pogrom. See footnote 25.
116

[The involvement of Islamic extremists in events in southern Kyrgyzstan has been established], Kabar news service, 24 June 2010, http://kabar.kg/
index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2091&
Itemid=77.
117
: ,
, ,
[Azimbek Beknazarov: the third force behind the
conflict in the south of Kyrgyzstan was internal, not external],
24.kg news service, 26 June, 2010, www.24.kg/osh/77186azimbek-beknazarov-tretya-sila-stoyavshaya-za.html
118

[I do not want to be an accomplice in a disastrous policy],
Kommersant, 22 June 2010, http://kommersant.ru/doc.aspx?Docs
ID=1390360&NodesID=5.
2. Two narratives
1. The Uzbeks were heavily armed and had carefully

planned their uprising. An increasingly hard-line
narrative, common in the Kyrgyz political establishment and adopted by some leaders, states or implies
that the Uzbeks had conspired to launch a coup de
main to strengthen their political position in the country. Numerous officials and observers, including a
senior security official, say that Uzbeks had, since
1990, been creating arms caches in their mosques,
waiting for the right time to strike.119
2. A more moderate account, encountered less often but
voiced by some very senior figures, also holds that
the Uzbeks were armed. I am sure of it, said one
high-level official. The police are [ethnic] Kyrgyz,
the courts are Kyrgyz, the prosecutors are Kyrgyz.
The truth is that every official is on the side of the
Kyrgyz. It was therefore natural that Uzbeks would
acquire weapons to protect themselves. To further
complicate matters, Kadyrjan Batyrov started to
work very loudly. Northern Kyrgyz had come to
power. We are much more liberal; the Uzbeks felt
good with them [sic]. They felt freedom had come.120
The official who enunciated the second narrative tried to
explain the cultural background to the violence again
deviating from external force theory. Referring to reports,
from international organisations and others, that a prominent politician, Kamchibek Tashiyev, and deputy government chairman Azimbek Beknazarov had both been
involved in anti-Uzbek violence, the official explained:
Tashiyev and Beknazarov are very southern people.
Their mentality is that [ethnic] Kyrgyz should be protected. They blame the Uzbeks, and say they do not
respect our culture. If we were not in power, they [the
119
120
Crisis Group interniew, Bishkek, 29 July 2010.

Crisis Group interview, high official, 22 July 2010.

Uzbeks] would crush us. Look how Kyrgyz are treated in

Uzbekistan. The official added that there had been reports that Tashiyev was involved in bloody events, but
doubted Beknazarov was, though he might have been
biased in some way.121
Page 16
war with us, said one demoralised local official, showing

visitors round a destroyed mahalla in Osh. The local
government is.126
Barring detailed evidence from the security organs, neither

the theory of a third hand nor the different narratives of
an armed Uzbek uprising seem convincing. They do not
explain the use of APCs, for example, the presence of
gunmen who are usually described as ethnic Kyrgyz, and
the crisp coordination between the crowd and older
Kyrgyz men, or the ease with which the marauders and
gunmen moved through the streets of Osh, unchallenged
by the authorities.
These issues need to play a central role in any serious
enquiry, national or international, into the events. Another
issue that frequently emerges in conversation with officials and requires further investigation is the alleged role of
Osh city authorities in the violence, including the
mayor.122 As noted earlier, city officials were seen distributing weapons, which military officers tried to retrieve
after the violence ended. An official in Jalalabad, asked to
explain why the casualties in that city had been so much
less than Osh, replied: because the local authorities were
not involved.123 While rejecting allegations of organising
the June pogroms, the mayor offered in August his own
analysis of the events, during his confrontation with the
central government. Asked by a Russian newspaper about
the June violence, he answered: I know just one thing.
The Uzbeks were encroaching on Kirgiziya's sovereignty. We repulsed them.124 Soon after his victorious confrontation with the government, his new ally, deputy
prime minister Azimbek Beknazarov, reportedly praised
him as the central player during the June crisis: When in
June all the generals ran and hid, only Myrzakmatov was
able to deal with the situation.125 The Kyrgyz arent at
121
Ibid. Tashiyev had in fact been publicly accused by the head

of the State Security Service on 24 June.
? [So who organised the slaughter in the south?],
Delo newspaper, 1 July 2010 http://delo.kg/index2.php?option=
com_docman&task=doc_view&gid=108&Itemid=77.
122
Crisis Group interview, senior government minister, July
2010; Crisis Group interview, high-level official, Bishkek, 22
July 2010.
123
Crisis Group interview, Jalalabad, 13 July 2010.
124

[Government directives do not have juridical force in the South], Kommersant Daily newspaper, 19
August 2010, http://kommersant.ru/doc.aspx?DocsID=1489447&
NodesID=5
125
,
[Melis Myrzakmatov annouced he is remaining as mayor
of Osh ] fergana.akipress.org news site, 20 August 2010,

http://fergana.akipress.org/news:92251/
126
Crisis Group interview, Osh, July 2010. The local authorities
told mahalla officials in early July not to speak to foreigners.
One of those who received these instructions says he was led to
believe his family would suffer if he disobeyed the order.

VI. UNANSWERED QUESTIONS

A. THE BAKIYEV FAMILY ROLE
Although there was considerable speculation that the
Bakiyev family would mount a determined effort to win
back power, and while it is quite clear they have enough
money to bankroll such an effort, it is doubtful that Kurmanbek Bakiyev himself would have much of a stomach
for a fight. Some who worked with him said he was one
of the more passive members of the family, often pressured by his younger son, Maxim, and his brother and
chief bodyguard Janysh. Both were ambitious and ruthless, and harboured presidential pretensions. They had
little love for each other, which may have made the presidents life even more difficult. The president, meanwhile,
stayed out of sight for large periods of time in the last
years of his rule, and seemed to have a diminishing interest
in politics. His absences were variously attributed to poor
health, a drinking problem, or a new young and unofficial
family. It was no great surprise, therefore, when he left
the country a little over a week after his overthrow. His
departure undermined the familys efforts to bring him
back to office.127
Despite the clumsiness of their attempts to establish a
power base in the south, the Bakiyevs continued to preoccupy the provisional government. Frankly, they [the
provisional government] became rather obsessed with
[the Bakiyevs], said a government adviser.128 After the
debacle in Osh in April, it was logical for the Bakiyev
clan to focus on Jalalabad, the family home base. Yet
here as well they suffered setbacks. The government
nonetheless remains convinced that the Bakiyevs could
bring them down. To buttress this fear, they usually cite a
35-minute obscenity-packed conversation that was posted
on YouTube on 19 May.129 In it Maxim and Janysh Bakiyev discuss plans to take back power. One idea has stuck
in the minds of many officials: plans to hire 500 well-
127
For more on Bakiyev family dynamics, see Crisis Group

Briefing, Kyrgyzstan: A Deceptive Calm; and Crisis Group Report, Kyrgyzstan: A Hollow Regime Collapses, both op. cit.
128
129
The conversation is in four parts on YouTube: www.youtube.
com/watch?v=6KB8GAnNM78&feature=related; www.
youtube.com/watchv=UTeKQRMYmSA&feature=related;
www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZolZJUA8B80&NR=1;www.
youtube.com/watch?v=biR2qlMqc88&feature=related. English
subtitles were added to the recording at some point. These are
partial, inaccurate and were not produced by a native speaker.
Maxim Bakiyevs abundant use of obscenities seems in particular to have bewildered the translator.
Page 17
trained thugs130 to overthrow the government. Officials

have mentioned this frequently in discussions of the pogroms, in their claims that snipers were firing indiscriminately at both sides to inflame inter-ethnic rage.
The tape makes it clear that the 500 thugs were to carry
out a coup in Bishkek. This was to happen before the 27
June referendum, and would take just a few hours, the
two men agreed. Four or five buildings would be seized,
including the parliament, defence ministry, security headquarters and television stations. They anticipated no resistance: the governments credibility was at rock bottom.
The two men agree that they need just the gunmen no
under-aged [kids], they insist, presumably a reference to
the crowds they had used unsuccessfully in the south.
They also admit that all their plans suffer from a major
disadvantage. The Boss who would be the legal and
legitimate leader of all this, was not interested. Maxim
says that he discussed the coup plans with the Boss. He
said I don't want to. Various references in different
contexts to the Boss leave no doubt it is the former president. The conversation implies that Kurmanbek Bakiyev
had been traumatised by an earlier attempted show of
force that had turned menacing. Janysh agreed, he wont
go through with it. There has been no confirmed sighting
of the 500 Bakiyev-hired thugs. Instead of the coup, the
family tried, with no success whatsoever, a powerplay in
their own home area on 13-14 May by seizing regional
administrative buildings. The failure of this suggests that
their plans considerably exceeded their ability to execute
them. The real limits of their skills as conspirators are
caught by Maxims first words on the tape: he remarks
with a self-congratulatory laugh that he and his uncle can
talk freely. No-one, he says, would have had time to
detect the new phone number they were using for this
conversation.
This is not to say that the pogroms did not involve any
members of the clan or, perhaps, former Bakiyev officials
now looking to burnish their nationalist credentials. It
seems likely, however, that the government is overemphasising the extent of the Bakiyev conspiracy to justify
its own impotence in the face of the Osh tragedy. It is
especially noteworthy that Mayor Myrzakmatov told a
journalist on 16 June that there was no evidence that the
Bakiyev clan was behind the pogrom.131 No marauders or
130
The term used was the untranslatable , which implies

someone whose mental functions are in deep freeze.
131
:
! [Osh Mayor Melis Myrzakmatov: I will not leave
my post], Ferghana.ru website, 16 June 2010, www.ferghana.
ru/article.php?id=6614.

demonstrators apparently expressed support for the deposed president during the pogroms.
B. WERE THE UZBEKS ARMED?

Despite frequent government claims throughout the fighting that the Uzbeks were heavily armed assertions
quoted by international media and other groups, including
Crisis Group, in the first days of the violence there is no
indication that the Uzbeks had any significant arsenal. No
video evidence has been found, and no reliable outside
testimonies have surfaced. The Uzbeks put up a furious
resistance in many places, with stones, blunt instruments,
molotov cocktails and some hunting rifles. As the pogroms continued, Uzbeks in several mahallas concluded
they should try to seize automatic weapons from attackers, even at the cost of their own lives. Discussions like
this were reported in the Uvamskaya street area and in the
centre of Osh.132 In some districts under attack, people
were reportedly phoning desperately, and unsuccessfully,
to acquire weapons. As this is clearly one of the key elements in the government narrative of events, the Kyrgyz
authorities need to provide independently verifiable evidence for their claims.
Page 18
VII. AFTERMATH
A. THE HUMAN COST
1. Death toll
On 18 June 2010, as the official death toll reached 191,
President Roza Otunbayeva warned that the real total was
likely to be ten times the official figure.133 Many victims,
she explained, would be buried immediately as local
custom demands, and not officially registered. From that
point on there were conflicting statistics. President
Otunbayevas formula was neither amended nor rescinded.
On 12 July a provisional government deputy chair,
Azimbek Beknazarov, told a Russian paper that 893 had
died.134 The official count, meanwhile, reached 393 by 19
August 2010.135
2. Destruction
Data assembled from satellite imagery by the UN indicate
that 2,677 buildings were totally destroyed: of these 1,977
in Osh city, 401 in Bazar Kurgon, to the north west of
Jalalabad, and 261 in Jalalabad city itself.136 By early
August 75,000 people were still displaced, half without
homes to return to. The priority should be providing shelter to those who need it before the onset of winter at the
end of October. At the moment, however, there is a sharp
difference of opinion between the city government and
international organisations. The latter stress the need to
restore the houses destroyed or damaged, and to provide
133
132
Crisis Group interview, Uvamskaya street, Osh, 9 July 2010.

Two weapons were seized in this way, with several of those
trying to seize the weapons reportedly killed in the process.
Vladimir Solovyov, : ,
[Roza Otunbayeva, God
willing, we will get a positive answer from Russia], Kommersant, 18 June 2010, www.kommersant.ru/doc.aspx?fromsearch=
a2bb7dfe-3fb2-4f1f-b95d-54539e989d0b&docsid=1387772.
134
Azimbek Beknazarov, Of course it will be a cock-up, op. cit.
135
Official death toll climbs to 393 in Osh and Jalal-Abad,
24.kg news site, 19 August 2010, http://eng.24.kg/community/
2010/08/19/13188.html
136
Damage analysis summary for the affected cities of Osh,
Jalal-abad and Bazar-Kurgan, Kyrgyzstan, damage analysis
based on post-crisis satellite imagery recorded on 18 and 21
June 2010, UNOSAT, 9 July 2010, www.reliefweb.int/rw/fullmaps_
sa.nsf/luFullMap/A9691155069208E6C12577620032B74E/$
File/Map.pdf?OpenElement. For a government estimate, see
.: , ,

[J.
Satybaldiyev: The damaged inflicted on Kyrgyzstan, all our
people from the moral and political viewpoint is enormous and
cannot be measured quantitatively], Belyi Parus, 27 July 2010,
www.paruskg.info/2010/07/27/29243#more-29243.

Page 19
temporary housing facilities as soon as possible.137 The

Osh authorities, on the other hand, speak of building high
rise housing for those who have lost their homes. This
represents a profound break with the traditional Uzbek
way of life in the mahallas. Construction would be slow,
and in Kyrgyzstan is likely to be derailed by corruption,
as building contracts are determined by political relationships rather than skill or probity.
close to their ruined homes, in tents provided by international organisations. One woman who returned, reluctantly by her own account, recalled being told by a visiting
Kyrgyz official that if she did not return, she would be
sent to a camp in Batken, far from Osh, and would not see
her family again for a long time.142
3. Refugees
Despite the bloodshed in Osh and Jalalabad, the provisional government went ahead with a referendum on a
new constitution on 27 June, insisting that this would be a
much needed validation of their legitimacy. The referendum passed peacefully, with the state of emergency and
curfew lifted for one day while voting took place. The
government claimed a turnout of 72.2 per cent, of which
90.5 per cent voted yes to the one question on the ballot.143 The turnout was also reported to be high in the south.
About 120,000 refugees, mostly Uzbek women, children

and elderly, fled across the border into Uzbekistan during
the violence. There they were housed in a well-organised,
tightly-controlled series of camps administered by the
Uzbek government. International officials noted that their
visits to the camps were closely monitored and sometimes
impeded by Uzbek officials.138 The refugees, many of
them located in and around Andijan, were not allowed out
of the camps, where they stayed for about two weeks.
As the 27 June referendum approached, they were urged
to return by both visiting Kyrgyz officials and representatives of the Uzbek government.139 The Office of the
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees
(UNHCR) expressed concern that they were being compelled to go back,140 which the government denied. The
fact that about 80,000 refugees left the camps spontaneously according to the Kyrgyz government, in the space
of a few days did not dispel doubts.141 They returned to
destroyed homes, staying with friends and relatives, or
salvaging what they could and taking up residence, usually
137
Kyrgyzstan: UNHCR calls for better return conditions, appeals for more funds before winter, UNCHR, 27 July 2010,
www.unhcr.org/4c4ea5a89.html; Crisis Group interview, international official, August 2010.
138
UNHCR starts aid distribution as number of refugees in Uzbekistan tops 100,000, UNHCR, 22 June 2010, www.unhcr.
org/4c20bc759.html; for access being impeded, Crisis Group
interview, senior international official, 26 June 2010.
139
[On the
Return of Refugees from Kyrgyzstan], Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Uzbekistan, 1 July 2010, http://mfa.uz/
rus/pressa_i_media_servis/news/o_vozvrashenii_bejenev_iz_
kirgizstana.mgr; :
[Refugees from Kyrgyzstan in Uzbekistan:
exodus and return], Ferghana.ru, 30 June 2010, www.ferghana.
ru/article.php?id=6638.
140
UNHCR cautions that returns in Kyrgyzstan must be sustainable, UNHCR, 23 June 2010, www.unhcr.org/4c230b759.
html.
141

78 675 [78,675 refugees returned to Kyrgyzstan after the tragic June events], 24.kg news
site, 27 June 2010, www.24.kg/osh/77632-v-kyrgyzstan-posleiyunskix-tragicheskix-sobytij.html.
B. REFERENDUM
The vote was monitored by a reduced team of OSCE observers security concerns led the OSCE to withdraw
long-term observers from Osh and Jalalabad and not to
deploy 300 short-term monitors.144 The OSCE declared
that the government established the necessary conditions
for the conduct of a peaceful constitutional referendum,
but expressed mild reservations about the inconsistent
legal framework and convoluted wording of the question.
It also noted that an atmosphere of fear and the prevailing security conditions in the Osh and Jalal-Abad oblasts
hampered possibilities for campaigning in the last two
weeks before the referendum.145 The turnout in Osh was
142

The ballot asked Kyrgyz citizens to vote yes or no to accept
the Constitution of the Kyrgyz Republic and the Law of the
Kyrgyz Republic On Implementing the Constitution of the
Kyrgyz Republic, the drafts of which are proposed by the Provisional Government for a referendum, www.shailoo.gov.kg/
postanovleniya-cik-kr/ob-utverzhdenii-teksta-byulletenya-dlyagolosovaniya-na-referendume-kyrgyzskoj-respubliki-27-iyunya2010-goda-ob-utverzhdenii-teksta-byulletenya-dlya-golosovaniyana-referendume-kyrgyzskoj-respub/. See On Approving the
Text of the Voting Ballot at the Referendum of the Kyrgyz Republic on 27 June 2010, Decree of the Central Election and
Referendum Commission of the Kyrgyz Republic. The referendum results are available from the Central Election and Referendum Commission of the Kyrgyz Republic, http://cec.shailoo.
gov.kg/i-election.asp?ElectionID=132&DistrictID=1470.
144
300
,
[Darya Podolskaya, OSCE will not send 300 people to Kyrgyzstan who were supposed to observe the referendum], 24.kg
news site, 22 June 2010, www.24.kg/politic/77199-obseotozvala-300-chelovek-prizvannyx-nablyudat.html.
145
Statement of Preliminary Findings and Conclusions,
OSCE/ODIHR, Limited Referendum Observation Mission, 28
143

the lowest nationwide, 51.05 per cent.146 Given the social

disruption, and the climate of fear which the OSCE itself
noted, this figure has been greeted with scepticism.
Before the vote some opposition figures claimed that the
results would be falsified, and threatened radical measures to defend their vote. Prominent among these was
Omurbek Suvanaliyev, who was Osh chief of police for
eight days during the unrest, and then resigned, ostensibly
in protest at what he claimed were indications the referendum would be fixed.147 After the vote, opposition
members did not protest.148
The government viewed the referendum as a crucial confirmation of its legitimacy. Some of those who voted yes
in the south, however, say they did so without fully understanding the issues at stake, or because they did not
want to the government to assume Uzbeks were in the
opposition. A Kyrgyz villager in Kurshab, on the other
hand, said categorically that no one in his area wanted
anything to do with the vote, while journalists in Jalalabad and Osh reported a mixed turn-out, good in some
districts, low in others. I did not vote for the referendum,
commented one of the journalists, I voted for peace.149
Since the referendum, a number of senior provisional
government figures, as planned, have resigned in order to
concentrate on the parliamentary elections in October.
Some senior government members continue to doubt the
wisdom of a parliamentary system. Of course it will be a
cock up, deputy premier Azimbek Beknazarov remarked.150 The provisional government had planned to
wind up its operations in the first week of July. Its first
attempt to dissolve itself was unsuccessful, as it failed to
assemble a quorum.151 Finally a new government of technocrats took its place. There is no sign this government
will be any more effective.
June 2010, www.osce.org/documents/odihr/2010/06/44868_

en.pdf.
146
Ibid.
147
He was appointed 12 June and resigned 20 June.
148
In late June Suvanaliyev was named head of Ata-Jurt, a radically inclined political party whose leadership includes former
Bakiyev-era senior security officials. On 20 July he resigned to
join another of the 57 parties expected to contest the elections.
Sources close to the presidential staff say he recently approached Otunbayeva for a government position.
149
Crisis Group interview, Jalalabad region, 3 July 2010.
150
Well, of course it will be a cock-up, Kommersant, op. cit.
151
Ibid.
Page 20
VIII. THE INTERNATIONAL MOOD:

SHADES OF PESSIMISM
When Russian government officials met their counterparts from a major Western country in May to discuss
Kyrgyzstan, both sides struggled to find the right word to
characterise the situation. They came up with the same
one, which translates, euphemistically, as complete
mess.152 This was before the Osh tragedy.
The pogroms further damaged the already sinking credibility of the Kyrgyz government. Since it took power in
April, the provisional government has failed to allay
doubts harboured by most foreign governments and international organisations regarding its effectiveness and
ability to focus on major problems. A sense of fatalism
about the countrys future seems to be setting in. In private the majority of foreign diplomats, international officials and other observers are dismayed at what most view
as the governments failure to stamp its authority on the
country, or make even modest headway in addressing the
daunting array of problems facing it. They believe the
president is largely in denial about the gravity of the
situation, and the causes of violence in the south. Although the government is elated that a donors conference
came up with over $1 billion in pledges, most foreign
officials say the leadership does not understand that the
chance of receiving even half this amount is very slender.153
A. THE U.S. AND RUSSIA:

GRIM AND GRIMMER
Washington and Moscow are if anything more pessimistic than others. U.S. officials view the Otunbayeva government as less than coherent and far from capable, but
the only available option. U.S. interests in Kyrgyzstan
revolve around the airbase at Manas International Airport
outside the capital, a major transit point for troops going
to or leaving Afghanistan about 50,000 pass through
each month. While Washington continues to place high
priority on the base, significant high-ranking officials in
the National Security Council, State Department and even
the Pentagon, at least acknowledge that past failures to rein
in corruption within the Bakiyev regime were counter-
152
Crisis Group interview, Western official, May 2010.

Crisis Group interviews, diplomats, international officials,
June-July 2010. The donors conference was held in Bishkek on
27 July and produced promised of $1.1 billion, to be allocated
over 30 months. International officials cautioned that no more
than one-third of the full amount is likely to be disbursed, given
normal donor patterns, and the subsequent humanitarian crisis
in Pakistan. Crisis Group interviews, Bishkek, 7, 14 August 2010.
153

productive. In particular they stress their belief that the

new fuel contract for Manas will be transparent, and will
serve to underline their determination to break with any
appearance of corruption. There are indications in Bishkek, however, that the contract will once again be awarded
to a number of local counterparts who have strong links
with both the current elite and the previous regime.154
The U.S. also actively pressed for the OSCE police mission and has agreed both to finance the largest percentage
of that cost and to provide some police, which the U.S.
hopes will increase its ability to detect and respond to any
renewal of ethnic conflict.155 Many Kyrgyz political activists, however, maintain that any foreign presence, including the police mission, will be biased towards the Uzbek,
and view the OSCE deployment with hostility. As a result,
it is unlikely the mission will spend any useful length of
time in the south. Western officials who are tracking the
issue closely believe that most powerful opposition to the
police mission comes from prominent organised crime
and narcotics figures in the south. They are said to be
pressing their political contacts hard to ensure the deployment never happens.156
Russia has long viewed Central Asia as a zone of special
interest. Kyrgyzstan, however, is now viewed as the
weakest link. On 12 June, when Otunbayeva admitted
that the situation in the south was out of control and said
she was engaged in intensive discussion with Russia,157
Moscow pulled back. There was little sign of urgency
from the Russian side. Instead of troops, Bishkek received a steady stream of discouraging advice. In a phone
conversation with Otunbayeva on 13 June, Russian
President Dmitry Medvedev stressed that it is necessary
to restore order with the maximum speed and put an end
to inter-ethnic conflict.158 On 14 June, Nikolay
Patrushev, a Putin intimate and secretary of the National
Security Council, declared that the situation in Kyrgyzstan was exceedingly complex, adding that measures
154
Crisis Group interviews, U.S. officials, Washington DC,

May-July 2010.
155
Crisis Group interview, senior State Department official,
Washington DC, 3 August 2010.
156
Crisis Group interview, senior Western official, Kyrgyzstan,
August 2010.
157

[Roza
Otunbayeva has made a press statement on the situation in the
south of the country], Kyrgyz government press service, 12
June 2010, www.kyrgyz-el.kg/index.php?option=com_content
&task=view&id=389&Itemid=1.
158

[Dmitry Medvedev spoke to Roza Otunbayeva], Ural KP
website, 13 June 2010, http://ural.kp.ru/online/news/684675/.
Page 21
taken by the government in Bishkek were inadequate.159

Russias special representative for Kyrgyzstan, Vladimir
Rushailo, called on Kyrgyzstans population to demonstrate civil maturity and realise the threat of the countrys
disintegration.160
Medvedev placed the matter in the hands of the Collective Security Treaty Organisation (CSTO), composed of
seven former Soviet states,161 and intended to be Russias
answer to NATO. While on paper ideally suited for
peacekeeping, CSTOs charter only permits intervention
in the case of aggression by an external government or
non-government entity; and several members, including
Uzbekistan and Belarus, would have been reluctant to
sanction a deployment that could set a precedent for Russian intervention in their countries.
In an interview a few days after the fighting subsided, Medvedev painted a bleak picture of Kyrgyzstans plight, but
hastened to add that Russian peacekeepers were not
needed. The problem was, he said, an internal matter. He
voiced concern that continuing chaos could lead to a
radical takeover and an Afghan scenario of the type
that prevailed during the Taliban years, and this would
be, in my view, extremely deplorable and exceedingly
dangerous for our country and the other countries of
Central Asia.162
The Kyrgyz government, meanwhile, views the lack of
Russian and U.S. military equipment support during the
unrest with wry bewilderment. Kyrgyzstan is home to
both Russian and U.S. bases, a high official remarked.
Neither gave us anything.163 During the crisis, the Kyrgyz leadership asked for armoured vehicles from the U.S.
to enable officials to travel into Osh from the city airport.
159
,

[The situation in Kyrgyzstan is exceedingly complex, and the
measures taken by the Provisional Government have proven
inadequate], 24.kg news service, 14 June 2010, www.24.kg/osh/
76405-nikolaj-patrushev-situaciya-v-kyrgyzstane-krajne.html.
160

[The inhabitants
of Kyrgyzstan must show civic maturity and realise the threat
of the countrys disintegration] 24.kg news site, 18 June 2010,
www.24.kg/osh/76939-vladimir-rushajlo-zhitelyam-kyrgyzstana.
html.
161
Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan.
162
Interview with Dmitry Medvedev, Wall Street Journal, 18
June 2010, available at www.kremlin.ru/transcripts/8082.
163
2010. Political support was vocal and reflected in visits to Bishkek by senior National Security Council, Pentagon and State
Department officials, including the deputy secretary of state.

These never materialised.164 On 23 June, CSTO announced plans to provide Kyrgyzstan will a modest number of helicopters, APCs, fuel and other assistance. The
aid would really be coming from Moscow, a security official in Bishkek noted, CSTO is just paper. Nothing
had arrived by mid-August. The reason was clear, the
security official remarked, Moscow does not trust this
government.165 Meanwhile, the high official remarked,
the Chinese from then till now have been silent.166
In private the Russians seemed embarrassed that they
were expected to play a major role. Rushailo asked visiting officials several times why everyone was looking to
Russia to take a lead in Kyrgyzstan.167 Russian officials
emphasised their concern that Kyrgyzstan would become
a quagmire, saying they feared finding themselves in a
situation where they would have to use lethal force, and
thus become a warring party.168 Russias reluctance to
intervene should, however, come as no surprise. Russian
specialists have long viewed Kyrgyzstan as one of several
Central Asian countries along with Tajikistan and Uzbekistan that may not survive in the long term. Russia
has few strong political or economic interests in Kyrgyzstan, which lacks the oil, gas and other resources of
some neighbours. Moreover, Russian officials say, the
current government is a debacle, and the Kremlin fears
that disorder will increase when the country becomes a
parliamentary republic after the October elections.169
The Manas airbase is a constant subject of debate among
Kyrgyz politicians, leaving some U.S. officials pessimistic that it will remain a hub much longer. If it does, however, it will continue to figure prominently in U.S. policy
on Afghanistan. Yet if Washingtons interest in Kyrgyzstan is predominantly linked to the existence of its
airbase, the disintegration of state power in Kyrgyzstan
could force Moscow, albeit reluctantly, to make the country a priority. A fragmented Kyrgyzstan would facilitate
the flow of Islamic insurgents from Afghanistan to
Russias borders; most of the narcotics for Russias growing drug problem already pass through Kyrgyzstan. If
state power weakens further, the flow would probably
164
Diplomatic sources later said that the request was for the
Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicle, an advanced
all terrain vehicle much in demand in Afghanistan. A single
vehicle costs well over $500,000. Sources said the government
seemed to have hit on the idea after an internet search. Crisis
Group interview, Bishkek, August 2010.
165
166
Crisis Group interview, high official, 22 July 2010.
167
Crisis Group interview, Western diplomat, Bishkek, 19 June
2010; senior international official, Bishkek, 20 June 2010.
168
Crisis Group interview, high Kyrgyz official, 22 July 2010;
senior UN official, 12 July 2010, and other similar.
169
Page 22
grow. Perhaps most worrying for Moscow would be a

semi-autonomous, semi-criminal entity in southern Kyrgyzstan, bordering and perhaps gradually infecting, three
other strategically or economically important countries
with its brand of chaos.
The UN, meanwhile, remained little more than an embarrassed bystander, in the words of one senior official.170 In New York, the UN Security Council appeared
to be waiting for Russia to intervene. The UN Secretariat
informally briefed the Security Council on 14 and 24
June. On 14 June, Under-Secretary General for Political
Affairs B. Lynn Pascoe called for urgent action by the
international community. On 24 June, Assistant SecretaryGeneral for Political Affairs Oscar Fernandez-Taranco
reported on continuing tensions and concerns of future
violence.171 On neither occasion did the Council take any
action, mainly influenced by Russias position and to the
intense frustration of UN officials on the ground. Political
pressure from the non-governmental sector also produced
no result.172
B. UZBEKISTAN: KARIMOV AS A MODERATE

One major surprise of the Osh crisis was the response of
Uzbekistans irascible and mercurial leader, Islam Karimov,
whose usual role in the region is to roil relations with his
neighbours over energy supplies, water policy or border
disputes. His view of the neighbouring presidents is less
than flattering. There was therefore considerable concern
as the crisis unfolded that Karimov might intervene or
take other steps that would exacerbate the situation.
Anxiety was further heightened on several occasions during the violence by rumours that Uzbek special forces
were marching on Osh to restore order. In fact, senior
officials in Bishkek said, at no point was there such a
risk. Karimov was the epitome of caution. Refugees were
allowed briefly onto Uzbek territory and housed in well
prepared and tightly controlled camps.
170
Crisis Group interview, international agency official, Bishkek, July 2010.

171
UN official warns Security Council that ethnic tensions
remain high in Kyrgyzstan, UN News Centre, 24 June 2010,
www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=35136&Cr=
Kyrgyz&Cr1=.
172
Crisis Group and Human Rights Watch called on the Security Council for an international stabilisation mission to help
provide security and ensure humanitarian access. Crisis Group
also signed a letter by the International Coalition for the Responsibility to Protect calling for an international response to
the situation. Council members declined to take further action
on the situation in Kyrgyzstan.

Karimovs behaviour was motivated by self interest: the

desire to ensure at all cost that events in the south of Kyrgyzstan did not undermine his tightly controlled but brittle regime. Western officials say he deployed security
forces to prevent any attacks on Kyrgyz communities in
Uzbekistan.173 The Uzbek government also reportedly
took measures to ensure that no unofficial volunteers
from his country could cross the border to assist their fellow Uzbeks.174 And Karimov, according to senior Kyrgyz
officials, discreetly expressed his opposition to the calls
advanced by Uzbeks in southern Kyrgyzstan for linguistic
or cultural recognition. Uzbekistan has substantial minorities, notably a very large Tajik population. None of them
enjoy such privileges, and Karimov is clearly not keen to
see a dangerous precedent emerge in Kyrgyzstan.
C. AN OPENING FOR JIHAD?

Angrier members of the Uzbek community are seeking
protectors. In the past, few middle class, urban Uzbeks
looked favourably on the Islamic guerrillas of the Islamic
Movement of Uzbekistan (IMU) or the Islamic Jihad
Union (IJU). Now, some Uzbeks say, they would be welcome. Southern Kyrgyzstan is an established part of the
IMU and IJU trail from Afghanistan to Uzbekistan or
further on to Europe. Small but regular movements from
northern Afghanistan, up through Tajikistan, to the Kyrgyz border region of Batken and then Osh and Jalalabad
take place every summer, when the high mountain passes
open. Western and regional security organisations have
long believed that both Osh and Jalalabad regions have
been used by both groups as safe havens.
The IMU suffered crippling losses during the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan. Most Western intelligence sources
now believe that it has restored its fighting capacity.
Their estimates, likely little more than a guess, usually
place IMU fighters in the low thousands. The IMU seems
to have become a trans-regional force, composed of Tajik, Kyrgyz, Tatar and Kazakh, as well as Chechens and
other fighters from the Caucasus. The IMU and the IJU,
which broke away from the IMU in the early 2000s, are
both reported to be active in combat in northern Afghanistan, predominantly along the border with Tajikistan.
So far, however, Kyrgyzstan has been fortunate. For most
of the past decade, insurgents who have passed through
the south have usually had another destination more
often than not Uzbekistan. Central Asia as a whole has,
173
Crisis Group communication, Western official, July 2010.

One senior Kyrgyz official said he believes Karimovs real
concern was that any spontaneous march towards the border
could easily wheel and head instead for Tashkent, to confront
Karimov himself. Crisis Group interview, 29 July 2010.
174
Page 23
moreover, played a subordinate role in the IMUs strategic plans. The movements principal objective, a late 2009
statement noted, was the defence of the shariat state in
Afghanistan. Once that is achieved, we will enter Central Asia as victors.175 In response to the pogroms, the
IJU stressed the need for greater faith, and offered no sign
they were preparing to intervene in support of southern
Kyrgyzstans Uzbeks. It seemed, in fact, somewhat embarrassed by the outbreak of Muslim upon Muslim violence.176
The IMU promised its Islamic fraternal assistance would
be at some point extended to the oppressed Muslims of
Central Asia if that is Allahs will.177
Shortly after that, the IMUs new leader, Usmon Odil,
described the bloodshed in Osh as the sort of low, evil
intrigues organised against Muslims by heretic governments.178 He called on Allah to ensure that Muslims
draw the correct conclusions and choose the path of
Jihad, the path of glory and honour, he added. Should
the IMU decide on a shift of strategy, however, Russia
and Uzbekistan might be obliged to abandon their handsoff position, and the U.S. may have to consider its longterm plans for the region. Kyrgyzstans security forces
were badly demoralised during the April 2010 uprising.
Morale suffered further blows during the pogroms, later
by government prosecution of senior commanders, and
finally by the disastrous attempt in August to remove
Osh's mayor. Kyrgyzstans ability to withstand a serious
insurgent push has always been questionable. It is even
more so now.
175
. ,
,
. ( 1.) [Interview with the late
Takhir Yuldashev. On the IMUs aims, tasks and plans in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Central Asia], [East
Time] website, 5 November 2009, www.easttime.ru/reganalitic/
1/231.htm.l. The statement is believed to reflect the IMU position, even though it is part of what is described as an interview
with Yuldashev, the IMU leader who was killed in August
2009 by a drone strike. The IMU only confirmed his death on
17 August 2010. Until then they had continued to put out
statements in his name.
176
The IJU statement, dated 11 July can be found on:
http://chavandoz.byethost5.com/index.php?newsid=162.
177
The IMU statement, dated 15 July, can be found on:
www.furqon.com/Maqolalar/ahmadiy06.2010.html. Hizb-ut Tahrir,
an Islamic group which avowedly rejects the armed struggle,
has an active presence in the south. It has, however, been
largely silent during the recent violence.
178
:
[The Islamic
Moverment of Uzbekistan: given the death of Takhir Yuldashev a new emir has been named], Ferghana.ru. website, 17
August 2010, quoting the IMU website furqon.com.

Page 24
IX. POLITICAL FALLOUT
$40 million.181 Narcotics brought in much more, officials

and diplomats believe.182
A. THE BAKIYEV FAMILY: CRISIS

MANAGEMENT
The family knows they have missed the boat, as far as

orchestrating a return to power is concerned, the security
official remarked in late July. Instead, they will now be
working on ways to keep control of as much of their
holdings as possible. This will be difficult, he added, as
many will be registered in other peoples names. In the
short term, he and others suggest, they will try to maintain
loyal security officials in place, particularly in the
south.183 The Bakiyev family will have to seek a deal with
any new strong man who emerges in the south. In the
longer term they will try to establish discreet alliances
with former officials who are now carving out for themselves an independent political future.
On 21 July 2010, Akhmat Bakiyev, one of former president Bakiyevs brothers and a key member of the clan,
was arrested in Jalalabad. The details of how he had
avoided arrest until then reinforced doubts about the loyalty of the security forces and undercut the governments
claim that the Bakiyevs had created a sophisticated underground movement. Akhmat had in fact been living
with relatives in the centre of the city, disguising himself
with a false beard and wig. Relatives of a prominent
businessman allegedly murdered in 2005 at the Bakiyev
familys instigation claim that they turned him in to the
authorities.179
Several days after the capture of Akhmat Bakiyev, a
young nephew of the former president, Sanjar Bakiyev,
was arrested and accused of taking part in the June violence in Jalalabad. Judging from the paucity of media
references before his arrest in late June, he does not seem
to have been part of the Bakiyev inner circle. Since their
arrests, both men were reported to have admitted participating in the pogroms and to be cooperating with
investigators.
Akhmats arrest has deprived the Bakiyev clan of an authority figure capable of conducting the delicate negotiations needed to ensure that the family retains part of its
fortune and avoids wholesale persecution. During his
brothers presidency, Akhmat was widely described as
the shadow governor-general of the south, and the
Bakiyev familys main business manager. The family
established a near monopoly on business and financial
activities in the south, both legal and illegal.180 A senior
security official said that the familys monthly turnover
of non-drug related businesses was probably around $30-
179
: -
[Akhmat Bakiyev, the brother of the
former president, has been detained in Jalalabad], Ferghana.ru
website, 22 July 2010, www.ferghana.ru/news.php?id=15239
&mode=snews.
180
In the north, the former presidents younger son, Maxim,
played a controversial and aggressive role in the economy. See
Crisis Group Report, Kyrgyzstan: A Hollow Regime Collapses,
op. cit.
At least two parties with strong Bakiyev links are planning to run in the October elections. One is Butun Kyrgyzstan, headed by Adakhan Madumarov, a former head
of the National Security Council under Bakiyev. A southerner, he still seems to retain a following within the Bakiyev
heartland, in and around Jalalabad.184 A senior member of
another new party, Azattyk, founded by the provisional
governments former defence minister, Ismail Isakov,
says his party is considering an alliance with Madumarov.185 A number of leaders of a high-profile new party,
Ata-Jurt, are former Bakiyev siloviki, or senior members
of the security military and law enforcement agencies.
Among its leaders is Kamchibek Tashiyev, who was accused
in late June by the chief of the State National Security
Service of involvement in the pogroms. Tashiyev denied
the allegations, and demanded a retraction and apologies
from the head of State Security.186 There are also indica-
181

July 2010. Like all statistics in Kyrgyzstan, these sums are at
best approximations.
182
July 2010.
183
: ,

[Keneshbek Dushebayev:
we have proof that the Bakiyevs sought an agreement with international terrorist organizations], 24.kg news service, 24 June
2010, www.24.kg/osh/77418-keneshbek-dushebaev-u-nas-estdokazatelstva-chto.html.
184
Madumarov is in fact from Kurshab village, see footnote 87,
op. cit.
185
Crisis Group interview, Bakyt Amanbayev, Azattyk Party,
186
: ,

, ,
[Kamchybek Tashiyev: I demand that Keneshbek Dushebayev personally apologises to me and repu-

tions that Maxim Bakiyev is developing business relations with important political leaders including some of
those who were active in his fathers downfall.187
There is, however, general agreement that the family will
not be able to hold on to their narcotics interests. Transit
of narcotics through the area requires a level of control
beyond even the richest private businessman. State patronage is needed, at the very least from a major regional
leader. Kyrgyzstan is a key link in the so-called northern
drug route, leading from Afghanistans poppy fields
through Tajikistan and onwards, to Russia and increasingly to China. The UN calls Osh a regional hub of
trafficking activity.188
Western officials have long said privately that narcotics
shipments in both Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan were controlled by very senior officials, in the case of Kyrgyzstan,
the Bakiyev family. A Kyrgyz security official, a career
intelligence specialist, says that under Bakiyev all arms of
the security services were involved, on the presidents
instructions, in ensuring the safe passage of heroin and
other opiates through the country. Two members of the
Bakiyev family, the presidents brother Janysh and his
elder son Marat, were senior figures in Kyrgyz state security. Drugs came through in large convoys, the official
said. The word came down: these are not to be touched.
Officials would salute the convoys and let them through.189
The Bakiyev family received between one third and one
half of the value of heroin and other opiates passing
through their country every month, the official claimed.190
The UN Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) estimates
that 95 metric tonnes of narcotics pass through Central
diates his statements, otherwise I will not be able to restrain the

people who have assembled to protect me], 24.kg news site,
24 June 2010, www.24.kg/osh/77456-kamchybek-tashiev-yatrebuyu-chtoby-keneshbek.html.
187
Crisis Group interview, Bishkek, 18 August 2010.
188
World Drug Report 2010, United Nations Office on Drugs
and Crime (UNODC), www.unodc.org/documents/wdr/WDR_
2010/World_Drug_Report_2010_lo-res.pdf.
189
The presidents younger son, Maxim Bakiyev, once recalled
that soon after his father took power in 2005, the family was
approached by representatives of the drug trade who offered
well over $50 million to keep the trade flowing without mishap.
He said that the offer had been rejected. Crisis Group interview,
Bishkek, February 2008.
190
Soon after presidential elections in mid 2009, President Bakiyev closed down the Drug Control Agency, to the considerable dismay of Western governments that had supported it. A
Western military official remarked at the time that the DCA
had started to work well, and had got too close to ruling circles in doing so. See Crisis Group Briefing, Kyrgyzstan: A Hollow Regime Collapses, op. cit.
Page 25
Asian states on their way to Russia every year.191 A significant amount stays in the region, however. This has
resulted in a growing incidence of addiction in Kyrgyzstan; and, as most users inject drugs intravenously, a
significant increase in HIV/AIDS. With the overthrow of
the president, the immensely profitable narcotics operation is looking for a new patron.
B. WINNERS
Well-informed Kyrgyz observers believe that one of the
big winners from the pogroms is organised crime, especially narcotics. The narcotics business, one wellplaced official remarked, loves smuta ( chaos,
confusion). Some officials maintain that the drug flow
through Kyrgyzstan increased perceptibly during the
chaos that began in April and continued through June.192
This has given rise to considerable speculation that the
gunmen who played such a prominent role in the pogroms
were supplied in part by organised crime and narcotics
figures, and that smugglers used the chaos to increase the
flow of narcotics through the country.
The main political winner to emerge from the crisis is
without a doubt Melis Myrzakmatov. After the pogroms,
senior government officials admitted, he froze the central
government out of the southern capital. He does not allow us to work in the city, said a high official;193 a senior
minister in the security bloc admitted to a foreign visitor
in July that he was not able to control his forces in the
south. They answer to the mayor.194 Myrzakmatov ostentatiously underlined his independence and nationalist credentials when President Roza Otunbayeva visited Osh on
29 July. In an interview to a leading Kyrgyz internet news
organisation on the day of her visit, he declared that we
have people power in Kyrgyzstan: only the people can
decide whether I resign or not.195 If anyone tried to dismiss him, he added, he would call a kurultay, a traditional
assembly and let them decide. In fact, Myrzakmatov was
appointed by the Bakiyev government, not by a tradi-
191
World Drug Report 2010, UNODC, op. cit.

For one example of this line: Crisis Group interview, senior
security official, Bishkek, 29 July 2010. It might also be argued
that an authoritarian but complicit ruler like Bakiyev served
them even better, however.
193
Crisis Group interview, high-level official, 22 July 2010.
194
Crisis Group interview, Bishkek, July 2010.
195
:
,
[Melis Myrzakmatov: Peoples power is functioning in Kyrgyzstan, and the question of my resignation will
be decided only by the people], 24.kg news site, 29 July 2010,
http://24.kg/osh/79670-melis-myrzakmatov-v-kyrgyzstanedejstvuet.html.
192

Page 26
tional assembly. Myrzakmatov also declared himself a

nationalist and declared I love my nation and will
work exclusively in its interests.196 The term nation
and nationalist clearly referred to ethnic Kyrgyz.197
however, Myrzakmatov accepted neither a forced resignation nor reported offers of important ministerial portfolios in exchange for a voluntary resignation. For its part,
the government clearly did not feel strong enough to arrest him when he refused to cooperate.
C. TWO DAYS IN AUGUST:

HUMILIATION FOR THE GOVERNMENT
The timetable for the presidents ultimatum came and

went. Government officials in Bishkek offered increasingly confused explanations of what was happening,
while in Osh demonstrators gathered in front of the
mayors office; by the morning of 20 August the crowd in
Osh was calling for Myrzakmatovs return and the presidents resignation.202 Until the last, senior government
officials demonstrated their unfailing capability to embarrass themselves. Thus, well after demonstrators in Osh
had been told that the mayor would remain in office and
was already heading back to Osh, the Secretary of the
National Security Council, Alik Orozov, broke a news
blackout to tell journalists the mayor had decided to resign.203 He wanted out of politics, Orozov explained, and
planned to go abroad for medical treatment.204 By then
the president had left the country to attend an informal
CSTO summit.
Exasperated by Myrzakmatovs defiance, and probably

influenced by increasingly international concern about the
mayor, the president decided to act. It was a disastrous
decision. Late on Wednesday 18 August she alerted senior international organisations and officials, both inside
and outside the country, that she was about to remove
Myrzakmatov; she seemed quite determined, according to
one of them.198 She probably had two aims: remove the
major threat to the countrys sovereignty, and prove to the
sceptical international donor community that she was truly in charge and capable of resolute action. She informed
her interlocutors that she would tell Myrzakmatov to resign by the end of 19 August, or be fired.199 At some
point on 18 August Myrzakmatov arrived in Bishkek for
meetings. A Russian newspaper reported that an elite police paramilitary unit attempted to detain him, but was
foiled by the mayors bodyguard.200
Before entering negotiations with the central government,
the mayor gave a newspaper interview, further escalating
the confrontation by declaring that the governments
directives have no juridical force in the south.201 He then
disappeared for a day and a half; he claimed he was held
against his will by the government. During that time,
196
, .
[I love my
nation and will work exclusively in its interests], 24.kg news
site, 29 July 2010; :

(),
[The entities in charge of the Jayma market do not
like me because I do not take bribes and do not follow anyones
lead], 24.kg news site, 29 July 2010, www.24.kg/community/
79669-melis-myrzakmatov-ya-ne-nravlyus.html.
197
The inter-communal violence of 10-14 June is often described
in Russian-language media as
clashes between natsiya ().
198
Crisis Group interview, Bishkek, senior Western official, 20
August 2010.
199
Crisis Group interview, Bishkek, international officials,
Western diplomats, 19 August 2010.
200

" [Government directives do not have
juridical force in the South], Kommersant Daily newspaper,
19 August 2010, http://kommersant.ru/doc.aspx?DocsID=
1489447&NodesID=5.
201
Ibid.
Myrzakmatov flew into Osh on Friday afternoon accompanied by one of the most powerful and controversial
members of the provisional government, Azim Beknazarov, a deputy prime minister. They tried to make him
give up his position, but Melis stood firm to the end,
Beknazarov told the crowd. I was one of the people who
supported him.205
The damage to the government in general and the president in particular is incalculable. Myrzakmatovs victory
underlined the governments impotence and incompetence, as well as the presidents dwindling authority.
Beknazarovs presence showed that even the mayors
explicit rejection of the governments directives was not
202
.,
[Demonstrators in Osh
demand the resignation of R. Otunbayeva, horsemen appear on
the square] Fergana.aki news site, 20 August 2010,
http://fergana.akipress.org/news:92131/.
203
: ()

, [Alik
Orozov: The Mayor of Osh has promised to go to his supporters and explain that he has decided to retire] 24.kg news site,
20 August 2010, www.24.kg/community/81038-alik-orozovmyer-goroda-osha-kyrgyzstan-melis.html.
204
Ibid.
205
.:
, [A. Beknazarov:they
tried to make Myrzakmatov give up his position, but he remains mayor], Fergana.aki news site, August 2010.

enough to ensure a united government front against him.

The incident has intensified many observers fears that
the worst-case scenarios for this country are the most
likely ones. Very powerful before 10 June, Myrzakmatov
is now the undisputed leader in the city and region of
Osh, and has considerable clout in other parts of the south
likely including Batken, on the border with Tajikistan.
With the consolidation of political power, businesspeople
in Osh say, comes power over the business sector.
After the August disaster, however, the presidents ability
to influence events is in serious doubt. Myrzakmatovs
national influence, on the other hand, is growing daily. At
a time of intense Kyrgyz nationalist ferment, Myrzakmatov
is, many government officials admit, viewed as a national
hero and the standard bearer of hard-line nationalism.206
His alliance with Beknazarov gives him an influential
voice and a ruthless ally in the capital. His remark reported by the government press service during his 20 August victory rally indicated that his ambitions extended
well beyond local government. We will transfer the
capital to Osh, he declared.207
Page 27
X. CONCLUSION
The violence and pogroms of June 2010 have further
deepened the gulf between ethnic Kyrgyz and Uzbeks. If
this problem remains unaddressed, it will not take twenty
years for another explosion to occur. It could happen five
years from now or, if the slide towards extreme nationalism continues unchecked, much sooner than that. Next
time the victimised party could look to Islamic radicals
for help, or violence could spread to other ethnic groups
Russians, Uighur, Tatar or Dungan.
Yet in the two months since the pogroms, the position of
the government and president have weakened further.
There is no indication that either can impose its will on
the country or the political elite. Given this, and the fact
that leading politicians and even some members of the
provisional government may well have been directly or
indirectly involved in the violence, there is a real risk that
official Bishkek will choose denial over a determined
effort to investigate, redress and reconcile. In any case,
the Kyrgyz government does not have the capacity to
carry out a serious investigation. The government itself
has doubts about the loyalty of its security forces, and
admits that police, courts and prosecutors are crippled by
top-to-bottom corruption. The coming parliamentary elections will make the government even more cautious.
The responsibility for trying to turn around the disastrous
situation in the south will therefore fall on the shoulders
of the international community almost by default, given
the outside worlds studied unwillingness to become involved while the pogroms were happening. It is a task
that will need coordination, a single strategy and a clear
vision, all attributes that have been conspicuously absent
so far. The international community will also need to deploy strenuous efforts to persuade a deeply reluctant Kyrgyz government to support such measures. The early deployment of the OSCE police mission to Osh would indicate that the international community understands that a
conflict prevention strategy requires a range of forceful
international diplomatic and other mechanisms.
206
Crisis Group interview, high-level government official, 22

July 2010.
207
... ( )
[This is how the meeting in Osh ended (no comments)]
Kabar news site, 20 August 2010, http://kabar.kg/index.php?
option=com_content&task=view&id=5592&Itemid=1.
It will need to push for a full-fledged, exhaustive investigation, with a leading role given to the Office of the
United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights or
another body with experience and capacity in this field.
The investigation will need to examine thoroughly all
violence, and all allegations made by both communities.
Without an authoritative and convincing investigation
into the violence, its causes and perpetrators, reconciliation will be impossible.

The international community should push for culturally

sensitive reconstruction, not ill-considered and inflammatory plans, such as those of the Osh government to build
high rise housing. The temperature will start to drop in
the south by October, long before even the foundations
have been dug for any apartment block. If those who lost
their homes do not want to move into apartments, they
should not be forced. If Uzbeks want to see their traditional mahallas restored, the international community
should respect that.
In particular, donors will need to ensure that no money
goes to the Osh regional government whose preeminent
leader Melis Myrzakmatov has already declared his determination to work exclusively for his Kyrgyz nation
(). Any donor putting money into the reconstruction
of the south should have an effective on-the-ground monitoring capacity, work closely with other organisations engaged in similar activities, and have a clear game-plan for
its dealings with the Osh government. Reconstruction of
the south should not be used for local leaders personal
gain. Even more importantly, reconstruction should not
become a means to reinforce the position of an extreme
nationalist politician who has already ceased to obey the
government in Bishkek.
The international community will also need to work on a
blueprint for establishing a long-term modus vivendi
between the majority Kyrgyz and ethnic minorities,
Uzbeks and others. The current approach that any recognition of Uzbek identity is a threat to Kyrgyz identity
leads only to a dead-end. The forces that were involved in
the well planned and executed attacks on Uzbek mahallas
are a threat to Kyrgyz democracy and development, not
just to ethnic minorities.
These are enormous challenges. The Kyrgyz government,
profoundly aware of its weakness and the dangers inherent
in examining too closely the tragedy of June 2010, can be
expected to resist these changes at every turn. Yet the
alternatives are very grim. The country is de facto split in
two. If this continues, a criminal state could well emerge
in the south, backed by narcotics dealers and providing
safe haven to Islamic radical guerrillas. A few years ago,
Kyrgyzstan was viewed, not completely implausibly, as
Central Asias outpost of democracy and tolerance. If it
continues on its present path, it risks at worst disintegration,
at best the reputation of being the sick man of Central Asia.
Brussels/Bishkek, 23 August 2010
Page 28

Page 29
APPENDIX A
MAP OF KYRGYZSTAN

Page 30
APPENDIX B
ABOUT THE INTERNATIONAL CRISIS GROUP
The International Crisis Group (Crisis Group) is an independent, non-profit, non-governmental organisation, with some
130 staff members on five continents, working through
field-based analysis and high-level advocacy to prevent and
resolve deadly conflict.
Crisis Groups approach is grounded in field research. Teams
of political analysts are located within or close by countries
at risk of outbreak, escalation or recurrence of violent conflict.
Based on information and assessments from the field, it produces analytical reports containing practical recommendations targeted at key international decision-takers. Crisis
Group also publishes CrisisWatch, a twelve-page monthly
bulletin, providing a succinct regular update on the state of
play in all the most significant situations of conflict or
potential conflict around the world.
Crisis Groups reports and briefing papers are distributed
widely by email and made available simultaneously on the
website, www.crisisgroup.org. Crisis Group works closely
with governments and those who influence them, including
the media, to highlight its crisis analyses and to generate
support for its policy prescriptions.
The Crisis Group Board which includes prominent figures
from the fields of politics, diplomacy, business and the
media is directly involved in helping to bring the reports
and recommendations to the attention of senior policy-makers
around the world. Crisis Group is co-chaired by the former
European Commissioner for External Relations Christopher
Patten and former U.S. Ambassador Thomas Pickering. Its
President and Chief Executive since July 2009 has been
Louise Arbour, former UN High Commissioner for Human
Rights and Chief Prosecutor for the International Criminal
Tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and for Rwanda.
Crisis Groups international headquarters are in Brussels,
with major advocacy offices in Washington DC (where it is
based as a legal entity) and New York, a smaller one in
London and liaison presences in Moscow and Beijing.
The organisation currently operates nine regional offices
(in Bishkek, Bogot, Dakar, Islamabad, Istanbul, Jakarta,
Nairobi, Pristina and Tbilisi) and has local field representation in fourteen additional locations (Baku, Bangkok,
Beirut, Bujumbura, Damascus, Dili, Jerusalem, Kabul,
Kathmandu, Kinshasa, Port-au-Prince, Pretoria, Sarajevo
and Seoul). Crisis Group currently covers some 60 areas of
actual or potential conflict across four continents. In Africa,
this includes Burundi, Cameroon, Central African Republic,
Chad, Cte dIvoire, Democratic Republic of the Congo,
Eritrea, Ethiopia, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Kenya, Liberia,
Madagascar, Nigeria, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Sudan,
Uganda and Zimbabwe; in Asia, Afghanistan, Bangladesh,
Burma/Myanmar, Indonesia, Kashmir, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Nepal, North Korea, Pakistan, Philippines, Sri Lanka,
Taiwan Strait, Tajikistan, Thailand, Timor-Leste, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan; in Europe, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bosnia
and Herzegovina, Cyprus, Georgia, Kosovo, Macedonia,
Russia (North Caucasus), Serbia and Turkey; in the Middle
East and North Africa, Algeria, Egypt, Gulf States, Iran,
Iraq, Israel-Palestine, Lebanon, Morocco, Saudi Arabia, Syria
and Yemen; and in Latin America and the Caribbean, Bolivia,
Colombia, Ecuador, Guatemala, Haiti and Venezuela.
Crisis Group receives financial support from a wide range of
governments, institutional foundations, and private sources.
The following governmental departments and agencies have
provided funding in recent years: Australian Agency for
International Development, Australian Department of Foreign
Affairs and Trade, Austrian Development Agency, Belgian
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Canadian International Development Agency, Canadian International Development and
Research Centre, Foreign Affairs and International Trade
Canada, Czech Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Royal Danish
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Dutch Ministry of Foreign
Affairs, European Commission, Finnish Ministry of Foreign
Affairs, French Ministry of Foreign Affairs, German Federal
Foreign Office, Irish Aid, Japan International Cooperation
Agency, Principality of Liechtenstein, Luxembourg Ministry
of Foreign Affairs, New Zealand Agency for International
Development, Royal Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs,
Swedish International Development Agency, Swedish
Ministry for Foreign Affairs, Swiss Federal Department of
Foreign Affairs, Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs, United
Arab Emirates Ministry of Foreign Affairs, United Kingdom
Department for International Development, United Kingdom
Economic and Social Research Council, U.S. Agency for
International Development.
The following institutional and private foundations have provided funding in recent years: Carnegie Corporation of New
York, The Charitable Foundation, Clifford Chance Foundation, Connect U.S. Fund, The Elders Foundation, William &
Flora Hewlett Foundation, Humanity United, Hunt Alternatives Fund, Jewish World Watch, Korea Foundation, John
D. & Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, Open Society
Institute, Victor Pinchuk Foundation, Ploughshares Fund,
Radcliffe Foundation, Sigrid Rausing Trust, Rockefeller
Brothers Fund and VIVA Trust.
August 2010

Page 31
APPENDIX C
CRISIS GROUP REPORTS AND BRIEFINGS ON ASIA SINCE 2007
Central Asia
Turkmenistan after Niyazov, Asia Briefing
N60, 12 February 2007.
Central Asias Energy Risks, Asia Report
N133, 24 May 2007 (also available in
Russian).
Uzbekistan: Stagnation and Uncertainty,
Asia Briefing N67, 22 August 2007.
Political Murder in Central Asia: No Time
to End Uzbekistans Isolation, Asia
Briefing N76, 13 February 2008.
Kyrgyzstan: The Challenge of Judicial
Reform, Asia Report N150, 10 April
2008 (also available in Russian).
Kyrgyzstan: A Deceptive Calm, Asia
Briefing N79, 14 August 2008 (also
available in Russian).
Tajikistan: On the Road to Failure, Asia
Report N162, 12 February 2009.
Women and Radicalisation in Kyrgyzstan,
Asia Report N176, 3 September 2009.
Central Asia: Islamists in Prison, Asia
Briefing N97, 15 December 2009.
Central Asia: Migrants and the Economic
Crisis, Asia Report N183, 5 January
2010.
Kyrgyzstan: A Hollow Regime Collapses,
Asia Briefing N102, 27 April 2010.
North East Asia

After the North Korean Nuclear Breakthrough: Compliance or Confrontation?,
Asia Briefing N62, 30 April 2007 (also
available in Korean and Russian).
North Korea-Russia Relations: A Strained
Friendship, Asia Briefing N71, 4
December 2007 (also available in
Russian).
South Koreas Election: What to Expect
from President Lee, Asia Briefing N73,
21 December 2007.
Chinas Thirst for Oil, Asia Report N153,
9 June 2008 (also available in Chinese).
South Koreas Elections: A Shift to the
Right, Asia Briefing N77, 30 June 2008.
North Koreas Missile Launch: The Risks
of Overreaction, Asia Briefing N91,
31 March 2009.
Chinas Growing Role in UN Peacekeeping, Asia Report N166, 17 April
2009 (also available in Chinese).
North Koreas Chemical and Biological
Weapons Programs, Asia Report N167,
18 June 2009.
North Koreas Nuclear and Missile Programs, Asia Report N168, 18 June
2009.
North Korea: Getting Back to Talks, Asia
Report N169, 18 June 2009.
Chinas Myanmar Dilemma, Asia Report
N177, 14 September 2009 (also available in Chinese).
Shades of Red: Chinas Debate over North
Korea, Asia Report N179, 2 November
2009 (also available in Chinese).
The Iran Nuclear Issue: The View from
Beijing, Asia Briefing N100, 17 February 2010 (also available in Chinese).
North Korea under Tightening Sanctions,
Asia Briefing N101, 15 March 2010.
South Asia
Afghanistans Endangered Compact, Asia
Briefing N59, 29 January 2007.
Nepals Constitutional Process, Asia Report
N128, 26 February 2007 (also available
in Nepali).
Pakistan: Karachis Madrasas and Violent
Extremism, Asia Report N130, 29
March 2007.
Discord in Pakistans Northern Areas, Asia
Report N131, 2 April 2007.
Nepals Maoists: Purists or Pragmatists?,
Asia Report N132, 18 May 2007 (also
available in Nepali).
Sri Lankas Muslims: Caught in the Crossfire, Asia Report N134, 29 May 2007.
Sri Lankas Human Rights Crisis, Asia
Nepals Troubled Tarai Region, Asia
Report N136, 9 July 2007 (also available in Nepali).
Elections, Democracy and Stability in Pakistan, Asia Report N137, 31 July 2007.
Reforming Afghanistans Police, Asia
Report N138, 30 August 2007.
Nepals Fragile Peace Process, Asia
Briefing N68, 28 September 2007 (also
Pakistan: The Forgotten Conflict in
Balochistan, Asia Briefing N69, 22
October 2007.
Sri Lanka: Sinhala Nationalism and the
Elusive Southern Consensus, Asia
Report N141, 7 November 2007.
Winding Back Martial Law in Pakistan,
Asia Briefing N70, 12 November 2007.
Nepal: Peace Postponed, Asia Briefing

N72, 18 December 2007 (also available
in Nepali).
After Bhuttos Murder: A Way Forward for
Pakistan, Asia Briefing N74, 2 January
2008,
Afghanistan: The Need for International
Resolve, Asia Report N145, 6 February
2008.
Sri Lankas Return to War: Limiting the
Damage, Asia Report N146, 20
February 2008.
Nepals Election and Beyond, Asia Report
N149, 2 April 2008 (also available in
Nepali).
Restoring Democracy in Bangladesh, Asia
Nepals Election: A Peaceful Revolution?,
Asia Report N155, 3 July 2008 (also
Nepals New Political Landscape, Asia
Report N156, 3 July 2008 (also available in Nepali).
Reforming Pakistans Police, Asia Report
N157, 14 July 2008.
Taliban Propaganda: Winning the War of
Words?, Asia Report N158, 24 July
2008.
Sri Lankas Eastern Province: Land,
Development, Conflict, Asia Report
N159, 15 October 2008.
Reforming the Judiciary in Pakistan, Asia
Report N160, 16 October 2008.
Bangladesh: Elections and Beyond, Asia
Briefing N84, 11 December 2008.
Policing in Afghanistan: Still Searching for
a Strategy, Asia Briefing N85, 18
December 2008.
Nepals Faltering Peace Process, Asia
Report N163, 19 February 2009 (also
Afghanistan: New U.S. Administration,
New Directions, Asia Briefing N89,
13 March 2009.
Pakistan: The Militant Jihadi Challenge,
Asia Report N164, 13 March 2009.
Development Assistance and Conflict in Sri
Lanka: Lessons from the Eastern Province, Asia Report N165, 16 April 2009.
Pakistans IDP Crisis: Challenges and
Opportunities, Asia Briefing N93, 3
June 2009.
Afghanistans Election Challenges, Asia

Sri Lankas Judiciary: Politicised Courts,

Compromised Rights, Asia Report
N172, 30 June 2009.
Nepals Future: In Whose Hands?, Asia
Report N173, 13 August 2009 (also
Afghanistan: What Now for Refugees?,
Asia Report N175, 31 August 2009.
Pakistan: Countering Militancy in FATA,
Asia Report N178, 21 October 2009.
Afghanistan: Elections and the Crisis of
Governance, Asia Briefing N96, 25
November 2009.
Bangladesh: Getting Police Reform on
Track, Asia Report N182, 11 December
2009.
Sri Lanka: A Bitter Peace, Asia Briefing
N99, 11 January 2010.
Nepal: Peace and Justice, Asia Report
N184, 14 January 2010.
Reforming Pakistans Civil Service, Asia
Report N185, 16 February 2010.
The Sri Lankan Tamil Diaspora after the
LTTE, Asia Report N186, 23 February
2010.
The Threat from Jamaat-ul Mujahideen
Bangladesh, Asia Report N187, 1
March 2010.
A Force in Fragments: Reconstituting the
Afghan National Army, Asia Report
N190, 12 May 2010.
War Crimes in Sri Lanka, Asia Report
N191, 17 May 2010.
Steps Towards Peace: Putting Kashmiris
First, Asia Briefing N106, 3 June 2010.
South East Asia

Jihadism in Indonesia: Poso on the Edge,
Asia Report N127, 24 January 2007
(also available in Indonesian).
Southern Thailand: The Impact of the
Coup, Asia Report N129, 15 March
2007 (also available in Thai).
Indonesia: How GAM Won in Aceh, Asia
Briefing N61, 22 March 2007.
Indonesia: Jemaah Islamiyahs Current
Status, Asia Briefing N63, 3 May 2007.
Indonesia: Decentralisation and Local
Power Struggles in Maluku, Asia
Briefing N64, 22 May 2007.
Timor-Lestes Parliamentary Elections,
Asia Briefing N65, 12 June 2007.
Indonesian Papua: A Local Perspective on
the Conflict, Asia Briefing N66, 19 July
2007 (also available in Indonesian).
Aceh: Post-Conflict Complications, Asia
Report N139, 4 October 2007 (also
available in Indonesian).
Southern Thailand: The Problem with

Paramilitaries, Asia Report N140, 23
October 2007 (also available in Thai).
Deradicalisation and Indonesian
Prisons, Asia Report N142, 19
November 2007 (also available in
Indonesian).
Timor-Leste: Security Sector Reform, Asia
Report N143, 17 January 2008 (also
available in Tetum).
Indonesia: Tackling Radicalism in Poso,
Asia Briefing N75, 22 January 2008.
Burma/Myanmar: After the Crackdown,
Asia Report N144, 31 January 2008.
Indonesia: Jemaah Islamiyahs Publishing
Industry, Asia Report N147, 28 February 2008 (also available in Indonesian).
Timor-Lestes Displacement Crisis, Asia
Report N148, 31 March 2008.
The Philippines: Counter-insurgency vs.
Counter-terrorism in Mindanao, Asia
Report N152, 14 May 2008.
Indonesia: Communal Tensions in Papua,
Asia Report N154, 16 June 2008 (also
available in Indonesian).
Indonesia: Implications of the Ahmadiyah
Decree, Asia Briefing N78, 7 July 2008
Thailand: Political Turmoil and the Southern Insurgency, Asia Briefing N80, 28
August 2008 (also available in Thai).
Indonesia: Pre-election Anxieties in Aceh,
Asia Briefing N81, 9 September 2008
Thailand: Calming the Political Turmoil,
Asia Briefing N82, 22 September 2008
(also available in Thai).
Burma/Myanmar After Nargis: Time to
Normalise Aid Relations, Asia Report
N161, 20 October 2008 (also available
in Chinese).
The Philippines: The Collapse of Peace in
Mindanao, Asia Briefing N83, 23
October 2008.
Local Election Disputes in Indonesia: The
Case of North Maluku, Asia Briefing
N86, 22 January 2009.
Timor-Leste: No Time for Complacency,
Asia Briefing N87, 09 February 2009.
The Philippines: Running in Place in
Mindanao, Asia Briefing N88, 16
February 2009.
Indonesia: Deep Distrust in Aceh as Elections Approach, Asia Briefing N90, 23
March 2009.
Indonesia: Radicalisation of the Palembang Group, Asia Briefing N92, 20
May 2009.
Recruiting Militants in Southern Thailand,
Asia Report N170, 22 June 2009 (also
available in Thai).
Page 32
Indonesia: The Hotel Bombings, Asia
Briefing N94, 24 July 2009 (also available in Indonesian).
Myanmar: Towards the Elections, Asia
Report N174, 20 August 2009.
Indonesia: Noordin Tops Support Base,
Handing Back Responsibility to TimorLestes Police, Asia Report N180, 3
December 2009.
Southern Thailand: Moving towards Political Solutions?, Asia Report N181, 8
December 2009 (also available in Thai).
The Philippines: After the Maguindanao
Massacre, Asia Briefing N98, 21
December 2009.
Radicalisation and Dialogue in Papua,
Asia Report N188, 11 March 2010.
Indonesia: Jihadi Surprise in Aceh, Asia
Philippines: Pre-election Tensions in
Central Mindanao, Asia Briefing N103,
4 May 2010.
Timor-Leste: Oecusse and the Indonesian
Border, Asia Briefing N104, 20 May
2010.
The Myanmar Elections, Asia Briefing
N105, 27 May 2010 (also available in
Chinese).
Bridging Thailands Deep Divide, Asia
Report N192, 5 July 2010.
Indonesia: The Dark Side of Jamaah
Ansharut Tauhid (JAT), Asia Briefing
N107, 6 July 2010.
Indonesia: The Deepening Impasse in Papua,

Page 33
APPENDIX D
INTERNATIONAL CRISIS GROUP BOARD OF TRUSTEES
CO-CHAIRS
OTHER BOARD MEMBERS
Carla Hills
Lord (Christopher) Patten
Adnan Abu-Odeh
Former European Commissioner for External

Relations, Governor of Hong Kong and UK
Cabinet Minister; Chancellor of Oxford University
Former Political Adviser to King Abdullah II

and to King Hussein, and Jordan Permanent
Representative to the UN
Former U.S. Secretary of Housing and U.S.

Trade Representative
Thomas R Pickering
Kenneth Adelman
Former U.S. Ambassador to the UN, Russia,

India, Israel, Jordan, El Salvador and Nigeria;
Vice Chairman of Hills & Company
Former U.S. Ambassador and Director of the

Arms Control and Disarmament Agency
Kofi Annan
PRESIDENT & CEO
Former Secretary-General of the United Nations;

Nobel Peace Prize (2001)
Louise Arbour
Nahum Barnea
Former UN High Commissioner for Human

Rights and Chief Prosecutor for the International
Criminal Tribunals for the former Yugoslavia
and Rwanda
Samuel Berger
Chief Columnist for Yedioth Ahronoth, Israel
Chair, Albright Stonebridge Group LLC; Former

U.S. National Security Advisor
Emma Bonino
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Morton Abramowitz
Former U.S. Assistant Secretary of State and
Ambassador to Turkey
Vice President of the Senate; Former Minister

of International Trade and European Affairs
of Italy and European Commissioner for
Humanitarian Aid
Lena Hjelm-Walln
Former Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign
Affairs Minister of Sweden
Swanee Hunt
Former U.S. Ambassador to Austria;
Chair, Institute for Inclusive Security; President,
Hunt Alternatives Fund
Mo Ibrahim
Founder and Chair, Mo Ibrahim Foundation;
Founder, Celtel International
Igor Ivanov
Former Foreign Affairs Minister of the Russian
Federation
Asma Jahangir
UN Special Rapporteur on the Freedom of
Religion or Belief; Chairperson, Human Rights
Commission of Pakistan
Wim Kok
Wesley Clark
Former Prime Minister of the Netherlands
Former NATO Supreme Allied Commander,

Europe
Ricardo Lagos
Sheila Coronel
Joanne Leedom-Ackerman
Member of the Board, Petroplus Holdings,

Switzerland
Toni Stabile, Professor of Practice in Investigative

Journalism; Director, Toni Stabile Center for Investigative Journalism, Columbia University, U.S.
Former International Secretary of International

PEN; Novelist and journalist, U.S.
Yoichi Funabashi
Jan Egeland
Cheryl Carolus
Former South African High Commissioner to
the UK and Secretary General of the ANC
Maria Livanos Cattaui
Editor in Chief, The Asahi Shimbun, Japan
Frank Giustra
President & CEO, Fiore Capital
Ghassan Salam
Dean, Paris School of International Affairs,
Sciences Po
Stephen Solarz
Former U.S. Congressman
George Soros
Chairman, Open Society Institute
Pr Stenbck
Former Foreign Minister of Finland
Director, Norwegian Institute of International

Affairs; Former UN Under-Secretary-General for
Humanitarian Affairs and Emergency Relief
Coordinator
Former President of Chile
Lord (Mark) Malloch-Brown

Former Administrator of the United Nations
Development Programme (UNDP) and UN
Deputy Secretary-General
Lalit Mansingh
Mohamed ElBaradei
Former Foreign Secretary of India, Ambassador

to the U.S. and High Commissioner to the UK
Director-General Emeritus, International Atomic

Energy Agency (IAEA); Nobel Peace Prize (2005)
Jessica Tuchman Mathews
Uffe Ellemann-Jensen
President, Carnegie Endowment for

International Peace, U.S.
Former Foreign Minister of Denmark
Gareth Evans
Benjamin Mkapa
Former President of Tanzania
President Emeritus of Crisis Group; Former

Foreign Affairs Minister of Australia
Moiss Nam
Mark Eyskens
Former Prime Minister of Belgium
Senior Associate, International Economics

Program, Carnegie Endowment for International
Peace; former Editor in Chief, Foreign Policy
Joschka Fischer
Ayo Obe
Former Foreign Minister of Germany
Legal Practitioner, Lagos, Nigeria
Dewi Fortuna Anwar
Gler Sabanc
Director for Program and Research, The Habibie

Center, Jakarta; Former Assistant Minister/State
Secretary for Foreign Affairs, Indonesia
Chairperson, Sabanc Holding, Turkey
Jean-Marie Guhenno
Arnold Saltzman Professor of Professional
Practice in International and Public Affairs,
Columbia University; Former UN UnderSecretary-General for Peacekeeping Operations
Javier Solana
Former EU High Representative for the Common
Foreign and Security Policy, NATO SecretaryGeneral and Foreign Affairs Minister of Spain

Page 34
PRESIDENTS COUNCIL
Crisis Groups Presidents Council is a distinguished group of major individual and corporate donors providing
essential support, time and expertise to Crisis Group in delivering its core mission.
Canaccord Adams Limited
Neil & Sandy DeFeo
Fares I. Fares
Mala Gaonkar
Alan Griffiths
Iara Lee & George Gund III

Foundation
Frank Holmes
Steve Killelea
George Landegger
Ford Nicholson
Statoil ASA
Ian Telfer
Neil Woodyer
INTERNATIONAL ADVISORY COUNCIL

Crisis Groups International Advisory Council comprises significant individual and corporate donors who contribute
their advice and experience to Crisis Group on a regular basis.
Rita E. Hauser
John Chapman Chester
H.J. Keilman
Co-Chair
Chevron
John Ehara
Equinox Partners
George Kellner
Amed Khan
Zelmira Koch
Neemat Frem
Seth Ginns
Paul Hoag
Liquidnet
Jean Manas
Elliott Kulick
Co-Chair
Anglo American PLC

APCO Worldwide Inc.
Ed Bachrach
Stanley Bergman & Edward
Bergman
Harry Bookey & Pamela
Bass-Bookey
Joseph Hotung
International Council of
Swedish Industry
McKinsey & Company

Najib Mikati
Harriet Mouchly-Weiss
Yves Oltramare
Anna Luisa Ponti &

Geoffrey Hoguet
Michael Riordan
Shell
Belinda Stronach
Talisman Energy
Tilleke & Gibbins
Kevin Torudag
VIVATrust
Yap Merkezi Construction
and Industry Inc.
SENIOR ADVISERS
Crisis Groups Senior Advisers are former Board Members who maintain an association with Crisis Group, and whose advice
and support are called on from time to time (to the extent consistent with any other office they may be holding at the time).
Mong Joon Chung
Pat Cox
Timothy Ong
Olara Otunnu
Gianfranco DellAlba
Jacques Delors
Alain Destexhe
Mou-Shih Ding
Shimon Peres
Victor Pinchuk
Gernot Erler
Marika Fahln
Stanley Fischer
Fidel V. Ramos
George Robertson
Christoph Bertram
Malcolm Fraser
I.K. Gujral
Max Jakobson
James V. Kimsey
Volker Rhe
Mohamed Sahnoun
Salim A. Salim
Douglas Schoen
Alan Blinken
Lakhdar Brahimi
Zbigniew Brzezinski
Aleksander Kwaniewski
Todung Mulya Lubis
Allan J. MacEachen
Christian Schwarz-Schilling
Michael Sohlman
Thorvald Stoltenberg
Martti Ahtisaari
Chairman Emeritus
George Mitchell
Chairman Emeritus
HRH Prince Turki al-Faisal

Shlomo Ben-Ami
Hushang Ansary
Richard Armitage
Ersin Arolu
scar Arias
Diego Arria
Zainab Bangura
Kim Campbell
Jorge Castaeda
Naresh Chandra
Eugene Chien
Joaquim Alberto Chissano
Victor Chu
Graa Machel
Barbara McDougall
Matthew McHugh
Nobuo Matsunaga
Mikls Nmeth
Christine Ockrent
Surin Pitsuwan
Cyril Ramaphosa
Michel Rocard
William O. Taylor
Leo Tindemans
Ed van Thijn
Simone Veil
Shirley Williams
Grigory Yavlinski
Uta Zapf
Ernesto Zedillo

193 The Pogroms in Kyrgyzstan

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

193 The Pogroms in Kyrgyzstan

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

193 The Pogroms in Kyrgyzstan

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

THE POGROMS IN KYRGYZSTAN

Asia Report N193 23 August 2010

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................. i

IV.MAY 2010 IN JALALABAD: THE WATERSHED ...................................................... 7

VI.UNANSWERED QUESTIONS ...................................................................................... 17

VII. AFTERMATH ............................................................................................................... 18

VIII.THE INTERNATIONAL MOOD: SHADES OF PESSIMISM ............................... 20

IX.POLITICAL FALLOUT ................................................................................................ 24

Asia Report N193

THE POGROMS IN KYRGYZSTAN

The Pogroms in Kyrgyzstan

One of the most striking differences between 1990 and

To the International Community:

To the Members of the UN Security Council,

Bishkek/Brussels, 23 August 2010

Asia Report N193

THE POGROMS IN KYRGYZSTAN

At 27.8 million, the population of Uzbekistan dwarfs

For further reading see Asia Briefing N102, Kyrgyzstan: A

Crisis Group communication, National Statistical Committee,

The Pogroms in Kyrgyzstan

a 2007 study, as opposed to 55.5 per cent of Uzbeks.6 The

Kyrgyzstan: Poverty Assessment Report (2007), World

The Pogroms in Kyrgyzstan

II. JUNE 1990

The violence was finally halted by the deployment of

The Pogroms in Kyrgyzstan

The Kyrgyz authorities produced several studies on the

Crisis Group interview, academic, Bishkek, 15 July 2010.

For further details, see Crisis Group Report, Kyrgyzstan: A

The Pogroms in Kyrgyzstan

While the economic and social situation deteriorated, and

B. THE SECURITY ORGANS: NEUTRAL

[Almazbek Atambayev, events in the

Crisis Group interview, Bishkek, 7 June 2010.

The Pogroms in Kyrgyzstan

The president and his brothers had established a family

C. THE MAYOR OF OSH:

transition and breakdown of the old patronage systems to

range from effectively criminal authority figures to fairly well

The Pogroms in Kyrgyzstan

tron from Oshs main square, he was careful not to lose

IV. MAY 2010 IN JALALABAD:

Crisis Group interviews, southern Kyrgyzstan, 13 July 2010;

Kyrgyz officials claim that he is being hidden by colleagues

The Pogroms in Kyrgyzstan

A. BATYROV AND RODINA

See Crisis Group Briefing, Kyrgyzstan: A Deceptive Calm,

equality and justice.49 He stressed that Uzbeks wanted to

[Jalalabad in the centre of world attention], 24.kg news site, 9

The Pogroms in Kyrgyzstan

who is protecting the provisional government, used

B. THE TEYIT BURNINGS:

rovs property would be taken away from him and he

On 14 May he was arrested by Osh police who stopped

The Pogroms in Kyrgyzstan

C. THE SECURITY ORGANS DID

Transcript of speeches in Jalalabad, op. cit.

The Pogroms in Kyrgyzstan