United States v. Pingley, 4th Cir. (2001)

Download as pdf
Download as pdf
You are on page 1of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6809

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
DAVID J. PINGLEY,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, Senior
District Judge. (CR-94-39)

Submitted:

July 12, 2001

Decided:

July 20, 2001

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


David J. Pingley, Appellant Pro Se. Sherry L. Muncy, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Elkins, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:
David J. Pingley seeks to appeal the district courts order
denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp.
2000).

We have reviewed the record and the district courts opin-

ion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal substantially on the


reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Pingley, No.
CR-94-39 (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 9, 2001). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

DISMISSED

You might also like