Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 12 views

    United States v. Adderly, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case from 2008. It states that Lorenzo Adderly appealed a district court order that granted a reduction of his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c) but denied his motion for a further reduction. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's rulings. The appeals court also noted that in 18 U.S.C. 3582(c) resentencing hearings, the court is not authorized to reduce a sentence below the amended guideline range that was applicable at the original sentencing.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    United States v. Adderly, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    12 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case from 2008. It states that Lorenzo Adderly appealed a district court order that granted a reduction of his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c) but denied his motion for a further reduction. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's rulings. The appeals court also noted that in 18 U.S.C. 3582(c) resentencing hearings, the court is not authorized to reduce a sentence below the amended guideline range that was applicable at the original sentencing.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-03-06 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-7916

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case from 2008. It states that Lorenzo Adderly appealed a district court order that granted a reduction of his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c) but denied his motion for a further reduction. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's rulings. The appeals court also noted that in 18 U.S.C. 3582(c) resentencing hearings, the court is not authorized to reduce a sentence below the amended guideline range that was applicable at the original sentencing.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    12 views2 pages

    United States v. Adderly, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case from 2008. It states that Lorenzo Adderly appealed a district court order that granted a reduction of his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c) but denied his motion for a further reduction. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's rulings. The appeals court also noted that in 18 U.S.C. 3582(c) resentencing hearings, the court is not authorized to reduce a sentence below the amended guideline range that was applicable at the original sentencing.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    You are on page 1of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-7916

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    LORENZO ADDERLY,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior
    District Judge. (3:95-cr-00074-RLW-1)

    Submitted:

    February 26, 2009

    Decided:

    March 6, 2009

    Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Lorenzo Adderly,
    Assistant United
    Appellee.

    Appellant Pro Se.


    Stephen
    States Attorney, Richmond,

    Wiley Miller,
    Virginia, for

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Lorenzo

    Adderly

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    orders

    granting his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18


    U.S.C.

    3582(c)

    (2006)

    and

    denying

    his

    motion

    reconsideration in which Adderly sought a further reduction.


    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    for
    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    United States v. Adderly, No. 3:95-cr-00074-RLW-1 (E.D.

    Va. June 17 & Aug. 22, 2008); see United States v. Dunphy, 551
    F.3d 247, 257 (4th Cir. 2009) (When a sentence is within the
    guidelines applicable at the time of the original sentencing, in
    an 18 U.S.C. 3582(c) resentencing hearing, a district judge is
    not

    authorized

    amended

    to

    guideline

    reduce
    range.).

    defendant's
    We

    dispense

    sentence
    with

    below

    oral

    the

    argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like